正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

What if the BBC and other mainstream broadcasters had challenged trans ideology instead of affirming it? This exchange between Vanessa Feltz and Andrew Gold offers a glimpse of the conversations audiences should have heard years ago. What does “be kind” mean for women losing single-sex spaces? For employees compelled...

JournalismSEEN's profile picture

SEEN in Journalism

23,897 subscribers

16,446 次观看 • 3 天前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Andrew Gold and Vanessa Feltz clash over gender identity, pronouns, and whether someone who transitions should be considered a woman. Andrew Gold: “It’s false and it’s a lie.” Vanessa Feltz: “Why is it wrong?” Andrew Gold: “Because they’re not women.” Vanessa Feltz: “What does that even mean that they’re not women?” Andrew Gold: “Because they’re not women. You know that.” Vanessa Feltz: “Well, what are they? If they’ve had the operation and they have fully transitioned?” Andrew Gold: “They’re men who’ve cut off their penises.” Vanessa Feltz: “Well, that’s a whole different subject.” Andrew Gold: “How is that a whole different subject?” Vanessa Feltz: “To make you use any pronouns, use their name. Don’t use it. Don’t use a pronoun that is unacceptable. Don’t use it at all. Call them something. If you have to refer to them, call them by their name. How about that?” Andrew Gold: “Well, I can talk as well. Let me talk as well. Can I talk as well?” Vanessa Feltz: “You’re talking plenty.” “Also, you’re a very nice fellow and you’re just being nasty just for the sake of it.”
4:47

Andrew Gold and Vanessa Feltz clash over gender identity, pronouns, and whether someone who transitions should be considered a woman. Andrew Gold: “It’s false and it’s a lie.” Vanessa Feltz: “Why is it wrong?” Andrew Gold: “Because they’re not women.” Vanessa Feltz: “What does that even mean that they’re not women?” Andrew Gold: “Because they’re not women. You know that.” Vanessa Feltz: “Well, what are they? If they’ve had the operation and they have fully transitioned?” Andrew Gold: “They’re men who’ve cut off their penises.” Vanessa Feltz: “Well, that’s a whole different subject.” Andrew Gold: “How is that a whole different subject?” Vanessa Feltz: “To make you use any pronouns, use their name. Don’t use it. Don’t use a pronoun that is unacceptable. Don’t use it at all. Call them something. If you have to refer to them, call them by their name. How about that?” Andrew Gold: “Well, I can talk as well. Let me talk as well. Can I talk as well?” Vanessa Feltz: “You’re talking plenty.” “Also, you’re a very nice fellow and you’re just being nasty just for the sake of it.”

‏ً

115,524 次观看 • 3 天前

🚨 WHEN THE NARRATIVE IS CHALLENGED... THE CONVERSATION IS SHUT DOWN. An Irish nurse confronted RTÉ over what she believes has been the broadcaster's failure to properly examine the consequences of the COVID response. She said she is now treating patients she believes have been harmed and criticised RTÉ's coverage, telling the audience: "I'm now one of these nurses who's picking up the pieces of the damage that's been done by the vaccine... and all of this is not being reported on RTÉ." Rather than exploring her concerns, the presenter replied: "That's a whole other night programme..." ...and quickly moved on. For years, many critics have argued that state broadcasters and much of the mainstream media have too often decided which debates are acceptable, while giving limited attention to viewpoints they regard as outside the mainstream—including concerns over the pandemic response, immigration and other contentious public policy issues. Whether you agree with the nurse or not, dismissing difficult questions instead of examining them does little to build public trust. Journalism shouldn't fear scrutiny. It should welcome it.
1:21

🚨 WHEN THE NARRATIVE IS CHALLENGED... THE CONVERSATION IS SHUT DOWN. An Irish nurse confronted RTÉ over what she believes has been the broadcaster's failure to properly examine the consequences of the COVID response. She said she is now treating patients she believes have been harmed and criticised RTÉ's coverage, telling the audience: "I'm now one of these nurses who's picking up the pieces of the damage that's been done by the vaccine... and all of this is not being reported on RTÉ." Rather than exploring her concerns, the presenter replied: "That's a whole other night programme..." ...and quickly moved on. For years, many critics have argued that state broadcasters and much of the mainstream media have too often decided which debates are acceptable, while giving limited attention to viewpoints they regard as outside the mainstream—including concerns over the pandemic response, immigration and other contentious public policy issues. Whether you agree with the nurse or not, dismissing difficult questions instead of examining them does little to build public trust. Journalism shouldn't fear scrutiny. It should welcome it.

Jim Ferguson

29,869 次观看 • 1 个月前

At today's FTC event on the harms of so-called "gender-affirming care," Andrew Ferguson opens with remarks detailing the lack of evidence for child sex change interventions along with their various harms, and explains why the FTC is taking action. "If a medical claim is false or misleading, it is the commission's sworn duty to protect American citizens from that claim, no differently than it would for any other false or misleading claim. Refusing to investigate these health claims and the potential consumer harm to parents and children merely because one political party supports those claims as a matter of its ideology would be the politicized choice."
19:11

At today's FTC event on the harms of so-called "gender-affirming care," Andrew Ferguson opens with remarks detailing the lack of evidence for child sex change interventions along with their various harms, and explains why the FTC is taking action. "If a medical claim is false or misleading, it is the commission's sworn duty to protect American citizens from that claim, no differently than it would for any other false or misleading claim. Refusing to investigate these health claims and the potential consumer harm to parents and children merely because one political party supports those claims as a matter of its ideology would be the politicized choice."

Do No Harm

27,560 次观看 • 1 年前

“The support we saw of trans rights… was sort of a mirage…” Yes, Congresswoman Sarah McBride, is correct that the initial support for the trans rights movement wasn’t real or sustainable & that the support came from people not understanding what they were supporting. But, and this is the really important part, the moment it was understood what trans rights truly means the support evaporated for very good reasons. This is because, trans rights always meant: • Women are a class of people that men can identify into, thereby destroying women’s sex based rights; • Men claiming to be women can destroy lesbian rights & communities due to the fetishes of heterosexual men; • Gay men are, at the very least, are shamed for not accepting women who claim to be men as gay men; • Children are lied to about the very clear reality of biological sex and the utter nonsense of gender identity; • Vulnerable children & young adults are sterilized via completely experimental yet unnecessary medical intervention based on the utter nonsense; • EVERYONE’S right to freedom of speech & belief is upended by ridiculousness such as, but not limited to, “preferred pronouns” & acknowledging correctly what one sees with their own eyes, destroying careers & lives for simply perceiving the world correctly & telling the truth. Had this been explained upfront, in 2016/2017, support for “trans rights” would have been nonexistent from the very beginning. And I suspect a lot of leaders of the moment were aware of that, so they obfuscated as much as possible until the reality of the situation couldn’t be hidden anymore. As is the case in 2025. Trans rights were never analogous with gay rights, gay marriage or any other civil rights movement because “trans rights” were always about taking what other groups already had, not gaining what other groups had. People already have the same rights as everyone else, and that’s following sex based rules/laws when they are applicable. The most embarrassing part is that, in 2025, journalists like Ezra Klein don’t accurately highlight the reality of the situation & instead indulge the lie that is “trans rights”, thus trying to keep the conversation in 2016 while the audience are listening in the present day. There is absolutely no way for the “trans rights” demands to coexist in a society where everyone else also has rights and that was their mistake. Turns out, other people like having rights.
1:29

“The support we saw of trans rights… was sort of a mirage…” Yes, Congresswoman Sarah McBride, is correct that the initial support for the trans rights movement wasn’t real or sustainable & that the support came from people not understanding what they were supporting. But, and this is the really important part, the moment it was understood what trans rights truly means the support evaporated for very good reasons. This is because, trans rights always meant: • Women are a class of people that men can identify into, thereby destroying women’s sex based rights; • Men claiming to be women can destroy lesbian rights & communities due to the fetishes of heterosexual men; • Gay men are, at the very least, are shamed for not accepting women who claim to be men as gay men; • Children are lied to about the very clear reality of biological sex and the utter nonsense of gender identity; • Vulnerable children & young adults are sterilized via completely experimental yet unnecessary medical intervention based on the utter nonsense; • EVERYONE’S right to freedom of speech & belief is upended by ridiculousness such as, but not limited to, “preferred pronouns” & acknowledging correctly what one sees with their own eyes, destroying careers & lives for simply perceiving the world correctly & telling the truth. Had this been explained upfront, in 2016/2017, support for “trans rights” would have been nonexistent from the very beginning. And I suspect a lot of leaders of the moment were aware of that, so they obfuscated as much as possible until the reality of the situation couldn’t be hidden anymore. As is the case in 2025. Trans rights were never analogous with gay rights, gay marriage or any other civil rights movement because “trans rights” were always about taking what other groups already had, not gaining what other groups had. People already have the same rights as everyone else, and that’s following sex based rules/laws when they are applicable. The most embarrassing part is that, in 2025, journalists like Ezra Klein don’t accurately highlight the reality of the situation & instead indulge the lie that is “trans rights”, thus trying to keep the conversation in 2016 while the audience are listening in the present day. There is absolutely no way for the “trans rights” demands to coexist in a society where everyone else also has rights and that was their mistake. Turns out, other people like having rights.

Sall Grover

59,133 次观看 • 1 年前

These were some good lads, and I’d like to think I won them over in the end! 🇬🇧 So many young people have been indoctrinated throughout the entire education system and taught what to think instead of how to think. Most have never even been exposed to opposing views or had their ideas properly challenged. That’s why grassroots conversations and public debates matter so much. It’s up to those of us in the know to break things down, ask difficult questions, challenge narratives, and undo the brainwashing that so many young people have been subjected to for years. Respect to these lads for actually engaging, listening, and having a respectful conversation. That alone puts them ahead of most young people!
2:59

These were some good lads, and I’d like to think I won them over in the end! 🇬🇧 So many young people have been indoctrinated throughout the entire education system and taught what to think instead of how to think. Most have never even been exposed to opposing views or had their ideas properly challenged. That’s why grassroots conversations and public debates matter so much. It’s up to those of us in the know to break things down, ask difficult questions, challenge narratives, and undo the brainwashing that so many young people have been subjected to for years. Respect to these lads for actually engaging, listening, and having a respectful conversation. That alone puts them ahead of most young people!

Montgomery Toms

56,234 次观看 • 3 个月前

John Major, "Our links to Europe and America may be loser now than once they were and that is a loss" "The loss of trade with Europe alone costs us £100 billion of lost trade every year" "That's a tax yield of £40 billion" "How useful would that have been in recent months to the Chancellor?" "With the many decisions that she took, which she ought not have taken, and would not have needed to take, had we not left the European Union" "We are told we should get over it and move on" "That is of course exactly what a burglar would say to the ransacked home owner when they finally confront one another" "That's not a view I have taken" "If you suffer a loss, you must look at a way of recovering much of the ground you have lost" "And the sooner we do that the better it will be for our economic standing and our reputation in many parts of the world"
1:05

John Major, "Our links to Europe and America may be loser now than once they were and that is a loss" "The loss of trade with Europe alone costs us £100 billion of lost trade every year" "That's a tax yield of £40 billion" "How useful would that have been in recent months to the Chancellor?" "With the many decisions that she took, which she ought not have taken, and would not have needed to take, had we not left the European Union" "We are told we should get over it and move on" "That is of course exactly what a burglar would say to the ransacked home owner when they finally confront one another" "That's not a view I have taken" "If you suffer a loss, you must look at a way of recovering much of the ground you have lost" "And the sooner we do that the better it will be for our economic standing and our reputation in many parts of the world"

Farrukh

130,272 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨🇦🇫 IMPORTANT TWEET: Afghanistan Times rejects Taliban decision to get Special aid from Israel and India. It is fine that we have good relations with India, but that does not mean we are part of any alliance between India and Israel. The Taliban should be ashamed of these actions. They should not be misleading the Afghan people or making their lives miserable. The reality is that many ordinary Afghans have suffered because of Taliban policies. A serious question will arise: how can the Taliban claim to stand for Muslim causes while supporting or aligning with Israel? If that is the case, then they are exposed in front of the Muslim world. It would be better for them to focus on peace and stability instead of creating more conflict and confusion.
1:12

🚨🇦🇫 IMPORTANT TWEET: Afghanistan Times rejects Taliban decision to get Special aid from Israel and India. It is fine that we have good relations with India, but that does not mean we are part of any alliance between India and Israel. The Taliban should be ashamed of these actions. They should not be misleading the Afghan people or making their lives miserable. The reality is that many ordinary Afghans have suffered because of Taliban policies. A serious question will arise: how can the Taliban claim to stand for Muslim causes while supporting or aligning with Israel? If that is the case, then they are exposed in front of the Muslim world. It would be better for them to focus on peace and stability instead of creating more conflict and confusion.

Afghan Times

34,053 次观看 • 6 个月前

Yesterday, I questioned the Chair of the EHRC about the new Code of Practice, and the harm it poses to trans people and others who do not conform to gender stereotypes. The Code suggests employees of a business or a service should enforce restrictions based on evidence such as “the individual’s physique or physical appearance, behaviour or concerns raised by other service users.” When asked to specify what these would be, the Chair couldn't answer and instead spoke about “common sense”. The truth is that people would be relying on gender stereotypes, which are harmful not only for trans people but for others as well.
3:40

Yesterday, I questioned the Chair of the EHRC about the new Code of Practice, and the harm it poses to trans people and others who do not conform to gender stereotypes. The Code suggests employees of a business or a service should enforce restrictions based on evidence such as “the individual’s physique or physical appearance, behaviour or concerns raised by other service users.” When asked to specify what these would be, the Chair couldn't answer and instead spoke about “common sense”. The truth is that people would be relying on gender stereotypes, which are harmful not only for trans people but for others as well.

Nadia Whittome MP

446,145 次观看 • 2 个月前

The attached video is an interesting clip from a news article just before the referendum vote. Make no mistake, the black population was ready for a fight and if the vote was NO, that we would have had a full on civil war on our hands. The question that I have to ask myself, after seeing with my own eyes many, many times how the mobs scatter after the first bullet flies, is how they would have stood up to the Armed Forces of the Republic. Should it have resulted in an outright war and the gloves were completely off, my personal feelings are that the numerical advantages of the enemy would have been neutralised by artillery and airstrikes into the townships. Not that I would have ever hoped for this, but this is the reality of war. With water, power and supplies cut off and disease spreading, I do not think that the 'majority' could have held out forever. Wouter Basson could have been properly unleashed and entire townships wiped out with poisoned water supplies and other nefarious means. Let's not even talk about our nuclear weapons, which would have most certainly drawn other nuclear powers into the war, some with us and some against us. Nukes aside, we would have had our work cut out for us with communist reinforcements arriving from neighbouring countries. SWAPO were formidable opponents and with them now well equipped, we could have faced some indiscriminate artillery shelling of our own cities and population areas. The Mozambicans were battle hardened by that stage and also a formidable enemy. As always, we would have had to deal with traitors and sympathisers from our own people. As an officer, I would have been responsible for executing traitors and deserters which would not have been nice, or that nice depending on how one looks at it. The whole country would have definitely come to a standstill, possibly for decades, the losses would have been devastating on both sides, and we would not have gotten to enjoy the 1995 World Cup victory, the wonderful 1990's or any day as we know it since then. Every single day from then until now would have been different. Some of my children would not have been born and I would have most certainly lost many loved family members, friends and brother comrades-in-arms, if not my own life. My best friend through my service lives down the road from me and I see him at least a couple of times a week. For that I am blessed. I am not saying that we could not have won, I am just asking if it would have been worth it. Come to think about it. I am glad that peace prevailed, in whatever iteration of peace that we call this. It hurts real bad to think that we laid down our arms and handed over governance of our beloved South Africa to an organised crime syndicate masquerading as a political party. Ultimately true intentions are judged by results and there is nobody alive that can not see plain as day, that the intention of the ANC all along was just to loot the country for themselves without a care in the world for anybody else. They took it all and threw everybody else the scraps. A tear runs down my face when I think of what we could have become and how those wonderful late 90's could have gone on forever. How do we fix this?
1:46

The attached video is an interesting clip from a news article just before the referendum vote. Make no mistake, the black population was ready for a fight and if the vote was NO, that we would have had a full on civil war on our hands. The question that I have to ask myself, after seeing with my own eyes many, many times how the mobs scatter after the first bullet flies, is how they would have stood up to the Armed Forces of the Republic. Should it have resulted in an outright war and the gloves were completely off, my personal feelings are that the numerical advantages of the enemy would have been neutralised by artillery and airstrikes into the townships. Not that I would have ever hoped for this, but this is the reality of war. With water, power and supplies cut off and disease spreading, I do not think that the 'majority' could have held out forever. Wouter Basson could have been properly unleashed and entire townships wiped out with poisoned water supplies and other nefarious means. Let's not even talk about our nuclear weapons, which would have most certainly drawn other nuclear powers into the war, some with us and some against us. Nukes aside, we would have had our work cut out for us with communist reinforcements arriving from neighbouring countries. SWAPO were formidable opponents and with them now well equipped, we could have faced some indiscriminate artillery shelling of our own cities and population areas. The Mozambicans were battle hardened by that stage and also a formidable enemy. As always, we would have had to deal with traitors and sympathisers from our own people. As an officer, I would have been responsible for executing traitors and deserters which would not have been nice, or that nice depending on how one looks at it. The whole country would have definitely come to a standstill, possibly for decades, the losses would have been devastating on both sides, and we would not have gotten to enjoy the 1995 World Cup victory, the wonderful 1990's or any day as we know it since then. Every single day from then until now would have been different. Some of my children would not have been born and I would have most certainly lost many loved family members, friends and brother comrades-in-arms, if not my own life. My best friend through my service lives down the road from me and I see him at least a couple of times a week. For that I am blessed. I am not saying that we could not have won, I am just asking if it would have been worth it. Come to think about it. I am glad that peace prevailed, in whatever iteration of peace that we call this. It hurts real bad to think that we laid down our arms and handed over governance of our beloved South Africa to an organised crime syndicate masquerading as a political party. Ultimately true intentions are judged by results and there is nobody alive that can not see plain as day, that the intention of the ANC all along was just to loot the country for themselves without a care in the world for anybody else. They took it all and threw everybody else the scraps. A tear runs down my face when I think of what we could have become and how those wonderful late 90's could have gone on forever. How do we fix this?

Pookie's Polls & Opinions

13,374 次观看 • 6 个月前

My name is Chris Elston, and I’m here to speak for children being irreversibly harmed by health professionals practicing what is falsely referred to as gender-affirming care. It is not caring to stop the development of children with puberty blockers. These are repurposed chemical castration and cancer drugs. It is not caring to alter their development with opposite-sex hormones. Every systematic review of the scientific literature shows that children are being harmed, and that scientific rigour is non-existent. Activist organizations pushing ideology have hijacked the medical community, and what is being done is nothing more than a live, unregulated experiment on kids. It is one of the great deceptions of our time to teach children that they might have been born in the wrong bodies! Affirming care would be to tell them that they are beautiful just as they are. No drugs or scalpels needed! Instead, children are being sterilized, and are having healthy body parts cut off. Overwhelmingly, these kids are autistic, have other mental health comorbidities, and many have suffered trauma or abuse. Girls as young as 12 are having their breasts removed, and 16-year-old boys are being castrated. State encroachment on parental rights is worsening outcomes. Here in Geneva, a child was taken from her parents because they refuse to transition her. Children have the human right to grow up with their bodies intact. It is time the Member States of the United Nations use the resolutions, procedures, and other tools at their disposal to stop this child abuse!
1:39

My name is Chris Elston, and I’m here to speak for children being irreversibly harmed by health professionals practicing what is falsely referred to as gender-affirming care. It is not caring to stop the development of children with puberty blockers. These are repurposed chemical castration and cancer drugs. It is not caring to alter their development with opposite-sex hormones. Every systematic review of the scientific literature shows that children are being harmed, and that scientific rigour is non-existent. Activist organizations pushing ideology have hijacked the medical community, and what is being done is nothing more than a live, unregulated experiment on kids. It is one of the great deceptions of our time to teach children that they might have been born in the wrong bodies! Affirming care would be to tell them that they are beautiful just as they are. No drugs or scalpels needed! Instead, children are being sterilized, and are having healthy body parts cut off. Overwhelmingly, these kids are autistic, have other mental health comorbidities, and many have suffered trauma or abuse. Girls as young as 12 are having their breasts removed, and 16-year-old boys are being castrated. State encroachment on parental rights is worsening outcomes. Here in Geneva, a child was taken from her parents because they refuse to transition her. Children have the human right to grow up with their bodies intact. It is time the Member States of the United Nations use the resolutions, procedures, and other tools at their disposal to stop this child abuse!

Billboard Chris 🌎

46,073 次观看 • 5 个月前

On this Transgender Day of Remembrance, we remember my speech at the United Nations Human Rights Council. My name is Chris Elston, and I am to here to speak for children being irreversibly harmed by health professionals practicing what is falsely referred to as gender-affirming care. It is not caring to stop the development of children with puberty blockers. These are repurposed chemical castration and cancer drugs. It is not caring to alter their development with opposite-sex hormones. Every systematic review of the scientific literature shows that children are being harmed, and that scientific rigour is non-existent. Activist organizations pushing ideology have hijacked the medical community, and what is being done is nothing more than a live, unregulated experiment on kids. It is one of the great deceptions of our time to teach children that they might have been born in the wrong bodies! Affirming care would be to tell them that they are beautiful just as they are. No drugs or scalpels needed! Instead, children are being sterilized, and are having healthy body parts cut off. Overwhelmingly, these kids are autistic, have other mental health comorbidities, and many have suffered trauma or abuse. Girls as young as 12 are having their breasts removed, and 16-year-old boys are being castrated. State encroachment on parental rights is worsening outcomes. Here in Geneva, a child was taken from her parents because they refuse to transition her. Children have the human right to grow up with their bodies intact. It is time the Member States of the United Nations use the resolutions, procedures, and other tools at their disposal to stop this child abuse!
1:39

On this Transgender Day of Remembrance, we remember my speech at the United Nations Human Rights Council. My name is Chris Elston, and I am to here to speak for children being irreversibly harmed by health professionals practicing what is falsely referred to as gender-affirming care. It is not caring to stop the development of children with puberty blockers. These are repurposed chemical castration and cancer drugs. It is not caring to alter their development with opposite-sex hormones. Every systematic review of the scientific literature shows that children are being harmed, and that scientific rigour is non-existent. Activist organizations pushing ideology have hijacked the medical community, and what is being done is nothing more than a live, unregulated experiment on kids. It is one of the great deceptions of our time to teach children that they might have been born in the wrong bodies! Affirming care would be to tell them that they are beautiful just as they are. No drugs or scalpels needed! Instead, children are being sterilized, and are having healthy body parts cut off. Overwhelmingly, these kids are autistic, have other mental health comorbidities, and many have suffered trauma or abuse. Girls as young as 12 are having their breasts removed, and 16-year-old boys are being castrated. State encroachment on parental rights is worsening outcomes. Here in Geneva, a child was taken from her parents because they refuse to transition her. Children have the human right to grow up with their bodies intact. It is time the Member States of the United Nations use the resolutions, procedures, and other tools at their disposal to stop this child abuse!

Billboard Chris 🌎

46,511 次观看 • 9 个月前

One thing I've had a hard time understanding is how and why so many people on the left have gone from respecting Elon Musk to seemingly hating him over the course of just 2 years. Hear me out please and provide your thoughts below... Musk definitely has some conservative views, and he most definitely has said some controversial and inappropriate things, but we must remember that Elon is also a huge proponent of what many Democrats have been pushing so hard for when it comes to climate change and the environment (example: see clip from a TED interview below). Tesla and Space X have so much potential for the planet and for humanity, as do Elon's concerns and visions of the future. Elon has his own beliefs, just like we all do. And just like I disagree whole-heartedly with so many opinions that my Republican friends' have, that doesn't mean I can't be friends with them and I can't share my thoughts with them. When we work together on finding common ground, and on discussing opinions and facts, that's when we as a people make progress. Isn't that what most of those on the left want? This doesn't mean we should stop calling out misinformation or begin accepting conspiracy theories as facts. It merely means working with humanity to make the human experience better and freer for us all.
0:53

One thing I've had a hard time understanding is how and why so many people on the left have gone from respecting Elon Musk to seemingly hating him over the course of just 2 years. Hear me out please and provide your thoughts below... Musk definitely has some conservative views, and he most definitely has said some controversial and inappropriate things, but we must remember that Elon is also a huge proponent of what many Democrats have been pushing so hard for when it comes to climate change and the environment (example: see clip from a TED interview below). Tesla and Space X have so much potential for the planet and for humanity, as do Elon's concerns and visions of the future. Elon has his own beliefs, just like we all do. And just like I disagree whole-heartedly with so many opinions that my Republican friends' have, that doesn't mean I can't be friends with them and I can't share my thoughts with them. When we work together on finding common ground, and on discussing opinions and facts, that's when we as a people make progress. Isn't that what most of those on the left want? This doesn't mean we should stop calling out misinformation or begin accepting conspiracy theories as facts. It merely means working with humanity to make the human experience better and freer for us all.

Ed Krassenstein

10,041,800 次观看 • 3 年前

One year ago, I was about to go to sleep but was looking at my phone when I started seeing photos of Anas Al Sharif. Like so many millions of people, I had been watching him report from Gaza. Every time I saw his posts, I felt relief that he was still alive and still fighting to share with the world the horrors of the terrorist state’s ge@@@@ide. We had seen so many journalists hunted and murdered so many brave young men and women, and I prayed often that he would not be one of them. I had seen the videos and photos of the joy in his face when he reunited with his small children, I remember him and his fellow journalist who had since been killed celebrating the first “cease-fire” and I wanted to believe that there would be more to celebrate for him and journalists like him. Seeing the photos, I knew what they meant. When I saw that Anas had been killed, I burst into tears. I think of his children often. I think of his courage and I think of so many people who call themselves “journalists” who are just scribes for empire and megalomaniacs. He entrusted us with his beloved homeland, what have we done?
0:45

One year ago, I was about to go to sleep but was looking at my phone when I started seeing photos of Anas Al Sharif. Like so many millions of people, I had been watching him report from Gaza. Every time I saw his posts, I felt relief that he was still alive and still fighting to share with the world the horrors of the terrorist state’s ge@@@@ide. We had seen so many journalists hunted and murdered so many brave young men and women, and I prayed often that he would not be one of them. I had seen the videos and photos of the joy in his face when he reunited with his small children, I remember him and his fellow journalist who had since been killed celebrating the first “cease-fire” and I wanted to believe that there would be more to celebrate for him and journalists like him. Seeing the photos, I knew what they meant. When I saw that Anas had been killed, I burst into tears. I think of his children often. I think of his courage and I think of so many people who call themselves “journalists” who are just scribes for empire and megalomaniacs. He entrusted us with his beloved homeland, what have we done?

fatima bhutto 🇵🇸🇱🇧🇮🇷

19,742 次观看 • 21 天前

Donald Trump, in response to the question if there is a deal that is acceptable that only covers nuclear: That would be acceptable. But the one thing and right up front, no nuclear weapons. If you could have made the deal two years ago, we would have made the deal. But they weren't willing to do that. Now they are willing to do it. So they're willing to do much more than they would have a year and a half ago or even a year ago when we've heard. Don't forget we've only been doing this for exactly one year. And we've started this with them a few months after the beginning of this term. This term has been amazing. But the results could very, they could surprise people. If they would have offered this deal originally when we first started, it would have been accepted immediately. We'll see what happens now.
0:53

Donald Trump, in response to the question if there is a deal that is acceptable that only covers nuclear: That would be acceptable. But the one thing and right up front, no nuclear weapons. If you could have made the deal two years ago, we would have made the deal. But they weren't willing to do that. Now they are willing to do it. So they're willing to do much more than they would have a year and a half ago or even a year ago when we've heard. Don't forget we've only been doing this for exactly one year. And we've started this with them a few months after the beginning of this term. This term has been amazing. But the results could very, they could surprise people. If they would have offered this deal originally when we first started, it would have been accepted immediately. We'll see what happens now.

Alireza Talakoubnejad

14,611 次观看 • 6 个月前

We are praying for this nation. We're people of the Book, and the Book tells us to pray for our leaders, even if we don't agree with them. And Trump is one of our leaders. He was a president. And Joe Biden is one of our leaders. He is the current sitting president. There aren’t many things that President Biden does that I agree with, but it is my job to pray for him anyway. And certainly to not bring him harm. I can disagree with him and still honor the office and still honor the person. And certainly not engage in any kind of stupidity like some of the rhetoric that has gone on in the last 48 hours—and really has gone on for the last several years. Some of you are really too serious about what happens in the White House. If you'd concentrate half as much on what happens in your house, you’d be in a whole lot better shape. That's really the common denominator of success. It hasn't got anything to do with those guys up there. Yes, they do some things that affect our lives, but I've had several of them try to ruin my life, and they hadn't pulled it off. And I've had several of them try to make my life better, and they haven’t pulled that off. I'm old, and I've seen presidents that were going to be the end of democracy, and they weren't. And I've seen presidents that were going to be the second coming of Jesus, and they were not even close. I think the problem is that the level of anger has to do with the expectations of what the office can provide. Treat these people like people—they have families, they have children, they have friends. I've got friends who are congressmen, friends who are senators, and the stuff that they have to put up with… Some of you are just out of control, and you should not spend your money on Financial Peace University—You should spend it on counseling. Concentrate on fighting for or against ideas. When you have to vilify or destroy a person because you disagree with their idea, you've already lost the argument, because you've lost the high ground. You don't have to destroy people for your idea to win.
1:14

We are praying for this nation. We're people of the Book, and the Book tells us to pray for our leaders, even if we don't agree with them. And Trump is one of our leaders. He was a president. And Joe Biden is one of our leaders. He is the current sitting president. There aren’t many things that President Biden does that I agree with, but it is my job to pray for him anyway. And certainly to not bring him harm. I can disagree with him and still honor the office and still honor the person. And certainly not engage in any kind of stupidity like some of the rhetoric that has gone on in the last 48 hours—and really has gone on for the last several years. Some of you are really too serious about what happens in the White House. If you'd concentrate half as much on what happens in your house, you’d be in a whole lot better shape. That's really the common denominator of success. It hasn't got anything to do with those guys up there. Yes, they do some things that affect our lives, but I've had several of them try to ruin my life, and they hadn't pulled it off. And I've had several of them try to make my life better, and they haven’t pulled that off. I'm old, and I've seen presidents that were going to be the end of democracy, and they weren't. And I've seen presidents that were going to be the second coming of Jesus, and they were not even close. I think the problem is that the level of anger has to do with the expectations of what the office can provide. Treat these people like people—they have families, they have children, they have friends. I've got friends who are congressmen, friends who are senators, and the stuff that they have to put up with… Some of you are just out of control, and you should not spend your money on Financial Peace University—You should spend it on counseling. Concentrate on fighting for or against ideas. When you have to vilify or destroy a person because you disagree with their idea, you've already lost the argument, because you've lost the high ground. You don't have to destroy people for your idea to win.

Dave Ramsey

213,276 次观看 • 2 年前

Guys, I found a new Abby Phillip gaslight: kids released into the interior to the custody of adults of indeterminate relation is not the same as "lost kids" and what is Tom Homan even talking about Lydia Moynihan: And one thing that Tom Homan highlighted today is that in Minnesota, they have found 3003- 364 children that the Biden administration lost, and instead 93% of the media coverage has been negative on ICE, according to Media Research Center. ABBY PHILLIP: I know Tom Homan has been big on this lost children thing, but the idea that these children were lost or missing has never been true. There are- some of them were released into the custody of relatives or other caretakers, which is part of the process over many years. MOYNIHAN: They often were released to adults who weren't verified. PHILLIP: Listen. I'm not- all I'm saying is that his characterization of them as being lost has never been accurate. And it wasn't accurate when he started saying it a year ago, Iit's still not accurate today. There are a lot of different reasons why those children were released into the custody of adults in the interior of the United States. That is not the same thing as those children being lost.
1:02

Guys, I found a new Abby Phillip gaslight: kids released into the interior to the custody of adults of indeterminate relation is not the same as "lost kids" and what is Tom Homan even talking about Lydia Moynihan: And one thing that Tom Homan highlighted today is that in Minnesota, they have found 3003- 364 children that the Biden administration lost, and instead 93% of the media coverage has been negative on ICE, according to Media Research Center. ABBY PHILLIP: I know Tom Homan has been big on this lost children thing, but the idea that these children were lost or missing has never been true. There are- some of them were released into the custody of relatives or other caretakers, which is part of the process over many years. MOYNIHAN: They often were released to adults who weren't verified. PHILLIP: Listen. I'm not- all I'm saying is that his characterization of them as being lost has never been accurate. And it wasn't accurate when he started saying it a year ago, Iit's still not accurate today. There are a lot of different reasons why those children were released into the custody of adults in the interior of the United States. That is not the same thing as those children being lost.

Jorge Bonilla

63,853 次观看 • 6 个月前

Really is a must read and watch 👇👇 'I am a lion of England, and I have served in the regiment of lions for England. I know exactly what is going on' 'In 2010 I served in Afghanistan where children would come up asking for water and shot my friend point blank in the face and ran away' That was 15 years ago. He would be the same age now as the people coming over on dingies today. What kind of government brings them over because they are sometimes on private flights to put them in hotels whilst putting the British and those who served in on the streets?
6:43

Really is a must read and watch 👇👇 'I am a lion of England, and I have served in the regiment of lions for England. I know exactly what is going on' 'In 2010 I served in Afghanistan where children would come up asking for water and shot my friend point blank in the face and ran away' That was 15 years ago. He would be the same age now as the people coming over on dingies today. What kind of government brings them over because they are sometimes on private flights to put them in hotels whilst putting the British and those who served in on the streets?

StarmerOut

131,576 次观看 • 8 个月前