Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 WHEN THE NARRATIVE IS CHALLENGED... THE CONVERSATION IS SHUT DOWN. An Irish nurse confronted RTÉ over what she believes has been the broadcaster's failure to properly examine the consequences of the COVID response. She said she is now treating patients she believes have been harmed and criticised RTÉ's...

JimFergusonUK's profile picture

Jim Ferguson

445,682 subscribers

29,869 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsHealth & Wellness
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Registered nurse/whistleblower Michelle Spencer: "Every time a nurse gives an injection of hepatitis B vaccine [to an infant], they are chemically assaulting that baby. They are giving 250 micrograms of aluminum when the FDA says do not give more than 18 micrograms." This clip of Spencer (Michelle Spencer) is taken from an interview with Apollo the Original (Apollo The Original) posted to YouTube on October 27, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I've been telling moms not to get the hepatitis B vaccine. So many moms have been refusing that shot that they had to have a meeting at work. And they said the nurses are giving biased information because all these moms are refusing the hep B shot. I'm like, 'That's so beautiful to hear,' because that means I've been telling all these nurses about the hepatitis B, and a lot of the nurses are even trying to get out of it now, too, because they're uncomfortable giving it because I've been pounding it into their brain. You're a nurse. You should know... what you're putting into your patient's body, especially a newborn, especially if it's not safe. "And so a couple months ago, a family member complained and said that 'This nurse, Michelle, is giving biased information. She's giving misinformation. She's talking these mothers out of giving the hepatitis B vaccine. She told my my sister, that the only way your baby can get hepatitis B is if she has sex with someone who has hepatitis B.' And so my boss called me into her office, and she told me all that right now, the complaint. "I said, 'Yes, that's true.' And I think my boss was, like, expecting me to say, 'Oh, I didn't do that,' or something. And I was like, 'Yeah, that's true.' I said, 'You know, every time a nurse gives an injection of hepatitis B vaccine, they are chemically assaulting that baby. They are giving 250 micrograms of aluminum when the FDA says do not give more than 18 micrograms.' And my boss looked at me, and she said, 'It's not about your beliefs, Michelle. It's about what's required of you per the institution.' "Every time a nurse gives that shot, they are chemically assaulting a baby. We were taught to do no harm. This is causing harm. And she said, again, 'I know you have your beliefs, Michelle, but you need to do what's required of you per the institution.' Does that not sound like follow the orders? ...She's a nurse, but of the entire women's floor, the labor and delivery floor, the antepartum and postpartum and all of women's health in there. She's the manager. The top one. And so she said, 'If you have questions, you can go to the head pediatrician and you can give her your information.' I said, 'Okay, I'll do that.' "I went to the head pediatrician and I told her exactly what I just told my boss. And she said, 'Oh, no, the aluminum in those shots isn't the same one on that paper that you just showed me. It's not a neurotoxin.' I'm sorry, but which aluminum is not a neurotoxin? I was so confused... They say it's a preservative... but it's a heavy metal. It doesn't belong in your body. It's a heavy metal. You don't need it in your brain. And to give 10 times the safe dose to every newborn that doesn't need it, it's craziness. I don't even have the words for this madness... It doesn't make sense. It will never make sense."
4:24

Registered nurse/whistleblower Michelle Spencer: "Every time a nurse gives an injection of hepatitis B vaccine [to an infant], they are chemically assaulting that baby. They are giving 250 micrograms of aluminum when the FDA says do not give more than 18 micrograms." This clip of Spencer (Michelle Spencer) is taken from an interview with Apollo the Original (Apollo The Original) posted to YouTube on October 27, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I've been telling moms not to get the hepatitis B vaccine. So many moms have been refusing that shot that they had to have a meeting at work. And they said the nurses are giving biased information because all these moms are refusing the hep B shot. I'm like, 'That's so beautiful to hear,' because that means I've been telling all these nurses about the hepatitis B, and a lot of the nurses are even trying to get out of it now, too, because they're uncomfortable giving it because I've been pounding it into their brain. You're a nurse. You should know... what you're putting into your patient's body, especially a newborn, especially if it's not safe. "And so a couple months ago, a family member complained and said that 'This nurse, Michelle, is giving biased information. She's giving misinformation. She's talking these mothers out of giving the hepatitis B vaccine. She told my my sister, that the only way your baby can get hepatitis B is if she has sex with someone who has hepatitis B.' And so my boss called me into her office, and she told me all that right now, the complaint. "I said, 'Yes, that's true.' And I think my boss was, like, expecting me to say, 'Oh, I didn't do that,' or something. And I was like, 'Yeah, that's true.' I said, 'You know, every time a nurse gives an injection of hepatitis B vaccine, they are chemically assaulting that baby. They are giving 250 micrograms of aluminum when the FDA says do not give more than 18 micrograms.' And my boss looked at me, and she said, 'It's not about your beliefs, Michelle. It's about what's required of you per the institution.' "Every time a nurse gives that shot, they are chemically assaulting a baby. We were taught to do no harm. This is causing harm. And she said, again, 'I know you have your beliefs, Michelle, but you need to do what's required of you per the institution.' Does that not sound like follow the orders? ...She's a nurse, but of the entire women's floor, the labor and delivery floor, the antepartum and postpartum and all of women's health in there. She's the manager. The top one. And so she said, 'If you have questions, you can go to the head pediatrician and you can give her your information.' I said, 'Okay, I'll do that.' "I went to the head pediatrician and I told her exactly what I just told my boss. And she said, 'Oh, no, the aluminum in those shots isn't the same one on that paper that you just showed me. It's not a neurotoxin.' I'm sorry, but which aluminum is not a neurotoxin? I was so confused... They say it's a preservative... but it's a heavy metal. It doesn't belong in your body. It's a heavy metal. You don't need it in your brain. And to give 10 times the safe dose to every newborn that doesn't need it, it's craziness. I don't even have the words for this madness... It doesn't make sense. It will never make sense."

Sense Receptor

39,469 views • 10 months ago

🎙️ DJ Akademiks appears to be sitting down with a woman who has recently gone viral after being linked to leaked footage allegedly connected to the ongoing controversy surrounding Sean Combs. 👀 Before diving into the details, Ak took a moment to ask how she has been handling the intense public attention, criticism, and scrutiny that has followed her over the last few years. 🗣️ “Everybody has talked about you. This is the first time we’re really hearing you talk.” Ak admitted that he himself had previously been critical, but wanted to give her an opportunity to speak for herself and explain how she has been navigating the backlash. 📌 During the conversation, she revealed that the attention has been overwhelming at times but says she has developed a much thicker skin through the experience. 🗣️ “I just try to be really still in the eye of the storm.” According to her, the biggest challenge hasn’t been the criticism itself, but feeling like other people are constantly trying to control her story and define who she is. 🚨 She explained that after years of being discussed online, she now wants to take ownership of her own narrative rather than allowing others to speak on her behalf. 🗣️ “I’m tired of people trying to take control of my narrative.” 👀 Ak also brought up the subject of privacy and sexuality, noting that many people may have expected her to retreat from the spotlight after private moments became public. However, he observed that she appears to be embracing who she is instead of allowing public opinion to dictate how she should respond. 📌 She acknowledged that the possibility of certain personal situations becoming public had been hanging over her for some time and said she had mentally prepared herself for that reality. 🗣️ “I just want to be myself.” Throughout the interview, she repeatedly emphasized feeling misunderstood and judged, while expressing a desire to finally speak directly to the public rather than through headlines, speculation, and online narratives. 🔥 The conversation ultimately shifted away from the controversy itself and focused more on her perspective, personal growth, and her attempt to reclaim control of her image after years of public scrutiny
5:38

🎙️ DJ Akademiks appears to be sitting down with a woman who has recently gone viral after being linked to leaked footage allegedly connected to the ongoing controversy surrounding Sean Combs. 👀 Before diving into the details, Ak took a moment to ask how she has been handling the intense public attention, criticism, and scrutiny that has followed her over the last few years. 🗣️ “Everybody has talked about you. This is the first time we’re really hearing you talk.” Ak admitted that he himself had previously been critical, but wanted to give her an opportunity to speak for herself and explain how she has been navigating the backlash. 📌 During the conversation, she revealed that the attention has been overwhelming at times but says she has developed a much thicker skin through the experience. 🗣️ “I just try to be really still in the eye of the storm.” According to her, the biggest challenge hasn’t been the criticism itself, but feeling like other people are constantly trying to control her story and define who she is. 🚨 She explained that after years of being discussed online, she now wants to take ownership of her own narrative rather than allowing others to speak on her behalf. 🗣️ “I’m tired of people trying to take control of my narrative.” 👀 Ak also brought up the subject of privacy and sexuality, noting that many people may have expected her to retreat from the spotlight after private moments became public. However, he observed that she appears to be embracing who she is instead of allowing public opinion to dictate how she should respond. 📌 She acknowledged that the possibility of certain personal situations becoming public had been hanging over her for some time and said she had mentally prepared herself for that reality. 🗣️ “I just want to be myself.” Throughout the interview, she repeatedly emphasized feeling misunderstood and judged, while expressing a desire to finally speak directly to the public rather than through headlines, speculation, and online narratives. 🔥 The conversation ultimately shifted away from the controversy itself and focused more on her perspective, personal growth, and her attempt to reclaim control of her image after years of public scrutiny

Cousin Tino ™️

41,391 views • 2 months ago

So the discourse around this Dave Ramsey clip is so mixed up that I’ve just decided to upload the whole thing. In the full context of the call, the caller makes it perfectly obvious that: 1. She has been with this man, whom she is now living with, for six years. 2. She is a nurse and can make her own money. 3. She has been out of school for two years, and in that time she has paid off $70,000 of the debt. In the course of the call, Dave never suggests that this man should have to pay for that debt. Indeed, he actively suggests that she leave him, which guarantees he will not pay for the debt. Dave also all but says that, because of her career choice, the caller will be able to pay for the debt on her own, even if she has to take extra hours. All Dave is saying—and this should have been obvious from the original clip—is that the two are not aligned on money and debt at all. It is also clear that Dave thinks the man is stringing her along, which he is. So they simply should not be married at all, because this is a fundamental failure in the relationship. I myself would add that, at this late stage in the relationship, if you do not trust a woman financially, you should simply not be with that woman. And that is perfectly fine. But what you do not do is drag her along for six years when she obviously wants to get married, and then put another two or three years of financial hoops in front of her so that maybe you will propose. It is a waste of everybody’s time.
6:16

So the discourse around this Dave Ramsey clip is so mixed up that I’ve just decided to upload the whole thing. In the full context of the call, the caller makes it perfectly obvious that: 1. She has been with this man, whom she is now living with, for six years. 2. She is a nurse and can make her own money. 3. She has been out of school for two years, and in that time she has paid off $70,000 of the debt. In the course of the call, Dave never suggests that this man should have to pay for that debt. Indeed, he actively suggests that she leave him, which guarantees he will not pay for the debt. Dave also all but says that, because of her career choice, the caller will be able to pay for the debt on her own, even if she has to take extra hours. All Dave is saying—and this should have been obvious from the original clip—is that the two are not aligned on money and debt at all. It is also clear that Dave thinks the man is stringing her along, which he is. So they simply should not be married at all, because this is a fundamental failure in the relationship. I myself would add that, at this late stage in the relationship, if you do not trust a woman financially, you should simply not be with that woman. And that is perfectly fine. But what you do not do is drag her along for six years when she obviously wants to get married, and then put another two or three years of financial hoops in front of her so that maybe you will propose. It is a waste of everybody’s time.

CTrefugees

135,314 views • 3 months ago

VIDEO: Mary Habila Was My Close Colleague, a Nurse, and We Lived Together in the Staff Quarters — Anita Baki Speaks on the Death of Her Colleague. “My name is Anita Baki, I am the colleague of Late Mary Habila. “Her death is so unfortunate and sudden and so surprising that it going viral and everywhere. I don't have much to say because I am not in a good State of mind to speak more about her death. It's a great loss to me, being a close person to her. “We were not transported from the north. I have been working with her for a very long time now. We have been working under the minister. “She is a nurse while I am the physiotherapist. The news has been spreading around that she is a physiotherapist, I am the physiotherapist here and not her. “We have been working under the minister for over three years. She has been working in the David Umahi Federal University, Uburu. “We stays together and other staff members in the quarters.”
1:52

VIDEO: Mary Habila Was My Close Colleague, a Nurse, and We Lived Together in the Staff Quarters — Anita Baki Speaks on the Death of Her Colleague. “My name is Anita Baki, I am the colleague of Late Mary Habila. “Her death is so unfortunate and sudden and so surprising that it going viral and everywhere. I don't have much to say because I am not in a good State of mind to speak more about her death. It's a great loss to me, being a close person to her. “We were not transported from the north. I have been working with her for a very long time now. We have been working under the minister. “She is a nurse while I am the physiotherapist. The news has been spreading around that she is a physiotherapist, I am the physiotherapist here and not her. “We have been working under the minister for over three years. She has been working in the David Umahi Federal University, Uburu. “We stays together and other staff members in the quarters.”

36kinniun media👑 🦁 🕊

18,760 views • 1 month ago

John Major, "Our links to Europe and America may be loser now than once they were and that is a loss" "The loss of trade with Europe alone costs us £100 billion of lost trade every year" "That's a tax yield of £40 billion" "How useful would that have been in recent months to the Chancellor?" "With the many decisions that she took, which she ought not have taken, and would not have needed to take, had we not left the European Union" "We are told we should get over it and move on" "That is of course exactly what a burglar would say to the ransacked home owner when they finally confront one another" "That's not a view I have taken" "If you suffer a loss, you must look at a way of recovering much of the ground you have lost" "And the sooner we do that the better it will be for our economic standing and our reputation in many parts of the world"
1:05

John Major, "Our links to Europe and America may be loser now than once they were and that is a loss" "The loss of trade with Europe alone costs us £100 billion of lost trade every year" "That's a tax yield of £40 billion" "How useful would that have been in recent months to the Chancellor?" "With the many decisions that she took, which she ought not have taken, and would not have needed to take, had we not left the European Union" "We are told we should get over it and move on" "That is of course exactly what a burglar would say to the ransacked home owner when they finally confront one another" "That's not a view I have taken" "If you suffer a loss, you must look at a way of recovering much of the ground you have lost" "And the sooner we do that the better it will be for our economic standing and our reputation in many parts of the world"

Farrukh

130,272 views • 9 months ago

What if the BBC and other mainstream broadcasters had challenged trans ideology instead of affirming it? This exchange between Vanessa Feltz and Andrew Gold offers a glimpse of the conversations audiences should have heard years ago. What does “be kind” mean for women losing single-sex spaces? For employees compelled to affirm beliefs they do not share? For children being medicalised? Can someone literally change sex? And what happens when one person’s identity conflicts with another person’s rights? Instead of examining those questions, much of the media adopted the language and assumptions of trans activism - while presenting those who challenged them as cruel, hateful or obsessed with other people’s lives. Had journalists subjected these claims to proper scrutiny from the beginning, would so many institutions have adopted damaging policies? Would people have lost jobs and livelihoods? Would children have been placed on medical pathways that many now regret? Journalism is supposed to test contested claims - not affirm them. Do watch the full Vanessa Feltz interview on Andrew Gold’s Heretics YouTube channel (link below) 👇
8:56

What if the BBC and other mainstream broadcasters had challenged trans ideology instead of affirming it? This exchange between Vanessa Feltz and Andrew Gold offers a glimpse of the conversations audiences should have heard years ago. What does “be kind” mean for women losing single-sex spaces? For employees compelled to affirm beliefs they do not share? For children being medicalised? Can someone literally change sex? And what happens when one person’s identity conflicts with another person’s rights? Instead of examining those questions, much of the media adopted the language and assumptions of trans activism - while presenting those who challenged them as cruel, hateful or obsessed with other people’s lives. Had journalists subjected these claims to proper scrutiny from the beginning, would so many institutions have adopted damaging policies? Would people have lost jobs and livelihoods? Would children have been placed on medical pathways that many now regret? Journalism is supposed to test contested claims - not affirm them. Do watch the full Vanessa Feltz interview on Andrew Gold’s Heretics YouTube channel (link below) 👇

SEEN in Journalism

16,446 views • 3 days ago

Registered nurse/whistleblower Michelle Spencer: "I know a sonographer who's been a sonographer for 40 years. She can look at an ultrasound of a mother, [her] placenta, and she can tell them, you got Pfizer, you got Moderna... it's in the placenta... even if the father got it, the baby is affected." This clip of Spencer (Michelle Spencer) is taken from an interview with Jodi O'Malley (Jodi O'Malley) posted to the NursesOutLoud (Nurses Out Loud) Rumble channel on November 1, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "They have not investigated the dead babies. They— They did investigate briefly after my investigation, when I said, you have an obligation to investigate. They went back and they checked, and they found that all of the fetal demises, 95% of them had Covid-vaccinated mothers. So that is a huge amount. "And the other little percent, maybe the record of the mother wasn't in there, because over here in California, they're highly vaxxed. Yes, most of them did get vaccinated because the OB doctor pushes it on them every single time. So they're highly vaxxed. "And then also I know a sonographer who's been a sonographer for 40 years. She can look at an ultrasound of a mother, a placenta, and she can tell them, you got Pfizer, you got Moderna. And if that's crazy, to be able to see that in an ultrasound. And if that patient, the mother, did not get COVID vaccine. The COVID vaccine, that means the father did, and it's in the placenta. So even if the father got it, the baby is affected. "And so there was— There's a huge correlation, it's like an obvious correlation between the COVID vaccine and these dead babies... One of my nursing friends told me a couple weeks after my investigation. She said, yeah, they went back and checked, and they found this correlation. And, she just told me to— Just by by mouth. By word of mouth. And so, now that I've been working with Greg, I've told him that. So he's gonna try to get an order for discovery to go back and check the fetal demises and the COVID-vaxxed mothers, to find the correlation, which is clearly there."
1:57

Registered nurse/whistleblower Michelle Spencer: "I know a sonographer who's been a sonographer for 40 years. She can look at an ultrasound of a mother, [her] placenta, and she can tell them, you got Pfizer, you got Moderna... it's in the placenta... even if the father got it, the baby is affected." This clip of Spencer (Michelle Spencer) is taken from an interview with Jodi O'Malley (Jodi O'Malley) posted to the NursesOutLoud (Nurses Out Loud) Rumble channel on November 1, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "They have not investigated the dead babies. They— They did investigate briefly after my investigation, when I said, you have an obligation to investigate. They went back and they checked, and they found that all of the fetal demises, 95% of them had Covid-vaccinated mothers. So that is a huge amount. "And the other little percent, maybe the record of the mother wasn't in there, because over here in California, they're highly vaxxed. Yes, most of them did get vaccinated because the OB doctor pushes it on them every single time. So they're highly vaxxed. "And then also I know a sonographer who's been a sonographer for 40 years. She can look at an ultrasound of a mother, a placenta, and she can tell them, you got Pfizer, you got Moderna. And if that's crazy, to be able to see that in an ultrasound. And if that patient, the mother, did not get COVID vaccine. The COVID vaccine, that means the father did, and it's in the placenta. So even if the father got it, the baby is affected. "And so there was— There's a huge correlation, it's like an obvious correlation between the COVID vaccine and these dead babies... One of my nursing friends told me a couple weeks after my investigation. She said, yeah, they went back and checked, and they found this correlation. And, she just told me to— Just by by mouth. By word of mouth. And so, now that I've been working with Greg, I've told him that. So he's gonna try to get an order for discovery to go back and check the fetal demises and the COVID-vaxxed mothers, to find the correlation, which is clearly there."

Sense Receptor

61,416 views • 9 months ago

Smoke, Mirrors and the “Disappearance” of Polio. A presentation by Suzanne Humphries, MD. As a nephrologist, Suzanne was treating patients and noticed several had kidney failure seemingly out of no where. They all had one thing in common, they were recently vaccinated with the flu vaccine. When she brought her concerns to her colleagues she was dismissed but she knew something was wrong and decided to look into it herself. This sent her on a journey to find out the truth about what was going on. She searched historical records, much that has been buried and she was shocked by what she discovered about the history of vaccines and infectious disease. This presentation focuses on polio but her book Dissolving Illusions outlines a hidden history of disease, an alternative to what we have all been told over and over again. That vaccines saved the modern world of the scourge of disease, a convenient story governments, scientists and pharmaceuticals love to tell in order to maintain their monopoly on the “truth” i.e. profit. Well if you haven’t figured it out yet, governments, scientists, and pharmaceuticals companies, as much as they want you to believe it, are not paragons of beneficence. In most cases, they are the source of human misery and an close examination of history proves this and that is exactly what Suzanne has done.
30:25

Smoke, Mirrors and the “Disappearance” of Polio. A presentation by Suzanne Humphries, MD. As a nephrologist, Suzanne was treating patients and noticed several had kidney failure seemingly out of no where. They all had one thing in common, they were recently vaccinated with the flu vaccine. When she brought her concerns to her colleagues she was dismissed but she knew something was wrong and decided to look into it herself. This sent her on a journey to find out the truth about what was going on. She searched historical records, much that has been buried and she was shocked by what she discovered about the history of vaccines and infectious disease. This presentation focuses on polio but her book Dissolving Illusions outlines a hidden history of disease, an alternative to what we have all been told over and over again. That vaccines saved the modern world of the scourge of disease, a convenient story governments, scientists and pharmaceuticals love to tell in order to maintain their monopoly on the “truth” i.e. profit. Well if you haven’t figured it out yet, governments, scientists, and pharmaceuticals companies, as much as they want you to believe it, are not paragons of beneficence. In most cases, they are the source of human misery and an close examination of history proves this and that is exactly what Suzanne has done.

Champagne Joshi

639,709 views • 3 years ago

Some of the media do get it. One of the reasons Pauline is getting such support at the moment is because of her authenticity. She doesn’t move with the wind like most other politicians. She has been fearless in standing up for what she believes in and saying what she thinks. None of the uniparty politicians can compete with that. What drives Pauline is a deep patriotism and love of country. At the end of the day, this is all about our great country and the action we need to take to get it back on track.
7:52

Some of the media do get it. One of the reasons Pauline is getting such support at the moment is because of her authenticity. She doesn’t move with the wind like most other politicians. She has been fearless in standing up for what she believes in and saying what she thinks. None of the uniparty politicians can compete with that. What drives Pauline is a deep patriotism and love of country. At the end of the day, this is all about our great country and the action we need to take to get it back on track.

One Nation Australia

24,955 views • 2 months ago

The most complicated challenge wasn’t stopping the migrants, or building the wall, or defunding the corrupt NGO’s. The most difficult challenge of this operation was showing the public that which has been hidden from them for many many years by a corrupt and treasonous mainstream media apparatus. ✅ The people had to see the drugs pouring over the border. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being bust all over the country. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being given privileges that even Americans don’t have ✅ The people had to see their hard earned dollars being robbed from them and given to people who came here illegally ✅ The people had to see them physically in their own cities, towns, and neighborhoods ✅ The people had to see a corrupt and treasonous judiciary system that would encourage criminal migrants to embed themselves within our country and sow chaos & crime Like it or not that is what the last four years were all about. And now you are seeing the results of the operation. Now you are seeing that public opinion, by CNN‘s own admission, is in Donald Trump‘s favor: “ no matter which way you cut it, the American public is with the Republicans, the American public is with Donald Trump to a much greater extent than they were in term number one. And it’s not just on the broad issue of immigration, it’s on the specifics as well, in which the American public is with Donald Trump and the Republicans. And that is why Donald Trump is eager to take on this fight.” 👉And that is why you are seeing the military begin to step in and clean up the mess. It is always been about manufacturing. The people‘s consent for those things which must be done. 🎥 Video Credit: @LatinosWithTrump
2:29

The most complicated challenge wasn’t stopping the migrants, or building the wall, or defunding the corrupt NGO’s. The most difficult challenge of this operation was showing the public that which has been hidden from them for many many years by a corrupt and treasonous mainstream media apparatus. ✅ The people had to see the drugs pouring over the border. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being bust all over the country. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being given privileges that even Americans don’t have ✅ The people had to see their hard earned dollars being robbed from them and given to people who came here illegally ✅ The people had to see them physically in their own cities, towns, and neighborhoods ✅ The people had to see a corrupt and treasonous judiciary system that would encourage criminal migrants to embed themselves within our country and sow chaos & crime Like it or not that is what the last four years were all about. And now you are seeing the results of the operation. Now you are seeing that public opinion, by CNN‘s own admission, is in Donald Trump‘s favor: “ no matter which way you cut it, the American public is with the Republicans, the American public is with Donald Trump to a much greater extent than they were in term number one. And it’s not just on the broad issue of immigration, it’s on the specifics as well, in which the American public is with Donald Trump and the Republicans. And that is why Donald Trump is eager to take on this fight.” 👉And that is why you are seeing the military begin to step in and clean up the mess. It is always been about manufacturing. The people‘s consent for those things which must be done. 🎥 Video Credit: @LatinosWithTrump

NewsTreason Channel 17

17,130 views • 1 year ago

COVID changed my worldview permanently. Nearly six years after COVID began, not one world leader has seriously examined what the vaccines did to the people they harmed. Not one investigation. Not one parliamentary inquiry with genuine teeth. Not one head of state who has stood at a podium and said, we owe the injured an honest accounting and we are going to provide it. The silence is universal. And it is coordinated in a way that individual negligence cannot explain. This is the observation that matters most to me, more than any document, more than any leaked communication, more than any specific piece of evidence. Because the behaviour of every major government simultaneously tells you something that the individual pieces cannot tell you alone. Genuine public health emergencies produce genuine review. What worked. What did not. Who was harmed and how. That is what accountable institutions do. What we have instead is a wall. And on the other side of that wall, the vaccine injured, still without diagnostic codes, still without compensation, still without the basic acknowledgment that what happened to them was real. While Long COVID is promoted heavily by the same governments and the same media that will not ask a single honest question about the injections. The parallel presentations. The overlapping symptoms. The convenient framing that points everywhere except at the product. The universal silence of world leaders on vaccine injury is not the behaviour of people who have nothing to hide. It is the behaviour of people who have collectively decided that the cost of honesty exceeds the cost of continued silence. That decision is itself the answer. Six years. Not one investigation. Not one independent inquiry. Not one head of state who has said: some of you were harmed, we know it, you deserve the accounting. The silence is not negligence. Negligence produces outliers. What we have is universal. And universality of this kind is decided. In just a week it’s my 5 year anniversary of being sick. After my adverse reaction to the Moderna Covid vaccine i have had many severe issues from my reaction to it and everything that followed. Please quote share for further reach and excuse the weird dubbed voice.
1:23

COVID changed my worldview permanently. Nearly six years after COVID began, not one world leader has seriously examined what the vaccines did to the people they harmed. Not one investigation. Not one parliamentary inquiry with genuine teeth. Not one head of state who has stood at a podium and said, we owe the injured an honest accounting and we are going to provide it. The silence is universal. And it is coordinated in a way that individual negligence cannot explain. This is the observation that matters most to me, more than any document, more than any leaked communication, more than any specific piece of evidence. Because the behaviour of every major government simultaneously tells you something that the individual pieces cannot tell you alone. Genuine public health emergencies produce genuine review. What worked. What did not. Who was harmed and how. That is what accountable institutions do. What we have instead is a wall. And on the other side of that wall, the vaccine injured, still without diagnostic codes, still without compensation, still without the basic acknowledgment that what happened to them was real. While Long COVID is promoted heavily by the same governments and the same media that will not ask a single honest question about the injections. The parallel presentations. The overlapping symptoms. The convenient framing that points everywhere except at the product. The universal silence of world leaders on vaccine injury is not the behaviour of people who have nothing to hide. It is the behaviour of people who have collectively decided that the cost of honesty exceeds the cost of continued silence. That decision is itself the answer. Six years. Not one investigation. Not one independent inquiry. Not one head of state who has said: some of you were harmed, we know it, you deserve the accounting. The silence is not negligence. Negligence produces outliers. What we have is universal. And universality of this kind is decided. In just a week it’s my 5 year anniversary of being sick. After my adverse reaction to the Moderna Covid vaccine i have had many severe issues from my reaction to it and everything that followed. Please quote share for further reach and excuse the weird dubbed voice.

Kenny Carmody

38,946 views • 1 month ago

“I’m the student nurse trending on social media. Someone took my video and deliberately used it to frame me for something I have not done. The girl in the circulating video is not me.” — The student nurse whose image has been linked to a viral video has clarified that she is not the woman in the video, adding that someone took her video from one of her social media accounts and used it to falsely implicate her in an incident she says she had nothing to do with.
0:51

“I’m the student nurse trending on social media. Someone took my video and deliberately used it to frame me for something I have not done. The girl in the circulating video is not me.” — The student nurse whose image has been linked to a viral video has clarified that she is not the woman in the video, adding that someone took her video from one of her social media accounts and used it to falsely implicate her in an incident she says she had nothing to do with.

𝐀𝐒𝐊

161,046 views • 20 days ago

A pretty young lady is frustrated with the dating scene and with men in general. She says men today are disrespectful and that the level of disrespect has gotten significantly worse. She blames the internet and the content guys are routinely exposed to online. She believes that to be part of the biggest driver of the problem. Is she right? Has she put her finger on what many women are feeling, or is something else at play? Are her standards for what she believes should be the proper role of a man unrealistic and could it be that her own expectations are the ones that have become tainted?
0:57

A pretty young lady is frustrated with the dating scene and with men in general. She says men today are disrespectful and that the level of disrespect has gotten significantly worse. She blames the internet and the content guys are routinely exposed to online. She believes that to be part of the biggest driver of the problem. Is she right? Has she put her finger on what many women are feeling, or is something else at play? Are her standards for what she believes should be the proper role of a man unrealistic and could it be that her own expectations are the ones that have become tainted?

AllieJade

21,133 views • 3 months ago

This is what they have been doing the whole day . Picking up the trash and segregating them with so much discipline. It pains me to think that these people are not shown any ounce of kindness by the state. #ChennaiSanitaryWorkersProtest
0:20

This is what they have been doing the whole day . Picking up the trash and segregating them with so much discipline. It pains me to think that these people are not shown any ounce of kindness by the state. #ChennaiSanitaryWorkersProtest

Shalin Maria Lawrence

151,463 views • 1 year ago

Lisa Nandy MP has said she is leaving X because it now favours misinformation over meaningful debate. In contrast, she praises the BBC as one of the "greatest defences against mistrust and misinformation." However, during the pandemic, the BBC wildly exaggerated the risk of Covid, promoted worst-case scenarios, sidelined scientific dissent, and helped create the climate of intense fear that justified lockdowns. And, of course, Prof. Devi Sridhar on BBC Newsround lied directly to the nation's children about Pfizer's experimental Covid vaccine, saying "So far the trials have shown the vaccine is 100% safe for children." What Lisa Nandy really means by "misinformation" is speech that the government disapproves of (which is, more often than not, the truth they don't want you to hear).
0:35

Lisa Nandy MP has said she is leaving X because it now favours misinformation over meaningful debate. In contrast, she praises the BBC as one of the "greatest defences against mistrust and misinformation." However, during the pandemic, the BBC wildly exaggerated the risk of Covid, promoted worst-case scenarios, sidelined scientific dissent, and helped create the climate of intense fear that justified lockdowns. And, of course, Prof. Devi Sridhar on BBC Newsround lied directly to the nation's children about Pfizer's experimental Covid vaccine, saying "So far the trials have shown the vaccine is 100% safe for children." What Lisa Nandy really means by "misinformation" is speech that the government disapproves of (which is, more often than not, the truth they don't want you to hear).

Mike Fairclough

63,829 views • 1 month ago

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Marco Rubio just got FIRED UP and obliterated the Fake News for refusing to focus on Iran's atrocities! "They would rather invest in the R*PISTS and the MURDERERS of Hamas than their OWN PEOPLE! THAT'S what you should be asking me about. THAT'S what the BBC should be covering and that's what these OTHER media outlets should be covering!" "Is how EVIL these people are in Iran and the DAMAGE they've done to people all over the world. The world's leading sponsor of terrorism is Iran and look what they're doing now." "This is an Iran that has organized the assassinations and the attempted assassinations of people all over the world, including civilians and dissidents and people that don't agree with." "There is no nation on earth that sponsors more terrorism than Iran." "They spent millions and millions of dollars sponsoring terrorism and targeting individuals all over the world and including civilians that have been caught up in them." "That's what Iran has done. They did spend their millions and millions on building roads and bridges and improving the life of their people." "That's why their people are always in the street protesting because their economy has been in shambles because they don't invest in their economy! They'd rather invest in Hezbollah!" "DESPITE all of that, the United States remains committed to finding a peaceful, a diplomatic solution to this crisis." He's so good 🔥🔥🔥
2:19

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Marco Rubio just got FIRED UP and obliterated the Fake News for refusing to focus on Iran's atrocities! "They would rather invest in the R*PISTS and the MURDERERS of Hamas than their OWN PEOPLE! THAT'S what you should be asking me about. THAT'S what the BBC should be covering and that's what these OTHER media outlets should be covering!" "Is how EVIL these people are in Iran and the DAMAGE they've done to people all over the world. The world's leading sponsor of terrorism is Iran and look what they're doing now." "This is an Iran that has organized the assassinations and the attempted assassinations of people all over the world, including civilians and dissidents and people that don't agree with." "There is no nation on earth that sponsors more terrorism than Iran." "They spent millions and millions of dollars sponsoring terrorism and targeting individuals all over the world and including civilians that have been caught up in them." "That's what Iran has done. They did spend their millions and millions on building roads and bridges and improving the life of their people." "That's why their people are always in the street protesting because their economy has been in shambles because they don't invest in their economy! They'd rather invest in Hezbollah!" "DESPITE all of that, the United States remains committed to finding a peaceful, a diplomatic solution to this crisis." He's so good 🔥🔥🔥

Eric Daugherty

125,744 views • 3 months ago

Anthony Albanese has just appointed the wrong person to head up the Fuel Taskforce. Albanese is a lifelong waste of taxpayers’ money. But much worse than that, he has been out of his depth for his entire career. He now presents an imminent danger to our nation’s prosperity, national security and strategic preparedness. Many people will suffer for his efforts as push-comes-to-shove in our latest fuel crisis. As they say in the playground “it takes one to know one”, and not to be outdone, Albanese has gone and put a lifelong climate zealot and total waste of taxpayer money, Anthea Harris, in charge of his government’s response to the fuel crisis. The clip below, is Anthea giving an address to the ANU in her capacity as the head of the Climate Change Authority back in 2015. She either believes that all of these non-solutions to the non-climate problem are really necessary - which would make her rather daft - or she knows it is all a complete scam, and she is just a scammer… A professional scammer, living on the taxpayer, and living well at that. More, the net result of her work so far has been to help destroy our energy grid and just about everything else relating to our ability to make and do things in Australia. Because cheap and reliable energy is central to everything. Everything. Whether it is coal, gas or liquid fuels, Australia needs these things to provide a first world living standard for the people. She has been an instrumental part of the war on our living standards thus far. All the while they threw our prosperity in the air, put on a blindfold and hoped to catch it in a windmill shaped glove. Now she is in charge of Albanese’s response to our critical, non-critical supply of petrochemicals that are at crisis levels, but we are not in a crisis. If you believe any of what they say… She is not an expert in logistics, or oil supply, petrochemicals or any other area that might qualify her to ensure we have enough fuel to drive critical infrastructure. Not to mention little things like food reaching the supermarket shelves. She is not the right person for the job. She probably thinks we could use this crisis as an opportunity to further destroy lives and livelihoods as they relentlessly pursue the hopeless goal of changing global temperatures. I am sure she will see it that way. She probably thinks we can all work from home and stop eating meat for the good of the planet. I have no doubt Albanese thinks she will do a great job of whatever it is he thinks he is achieving at our expense. I have no doubt we will be worse off for her best efforts. We have good cause to be very cynical of the current leadership. They won’t even admit there are problems - not in any of the areas where there are many problems - so they won’t be able to properly solve them. We have every right to be worried, and we have little cause to respect them or their leadership at this critical time in our nation’s history. I am afraid that if we don’t vote all of these absolute lightweights out of office at the next election, there won’t be a Nation left. I have no doubt there are problems in the opposition and other camps, but they could not be worse than the problems we have in government. I just want Australia back.
3:03

Anthony Albanese has just appointed the wrong person to head up the Fuel Taskforce. Albanese is a lifelong waste of taxpayers’ money. But much worse than that, he has been out of his depth for his entire career. He now presents an imminent danger to our nation’s prosperity, national security and strategic preparedness. Many people will suffer for his efforts as push-comes-to-shove in our latest fuel crisis. As they say in the playground “it takes one to know one”, and not to be outdone, Albanese has gone and put a lifelong climate zealot and total waste of taxpayer money, Anthea Harris, in charge of his government’s response to the fuel crisis. The clip below, is Anthea giving an address to the ANU in her capacity as the head of the Climate Change Authority back in 2015. She either believes that all of these non-solutions to the non-climate problem are really necessary - which would make her rather daft - or she knows it is all a complete scam, and she is just a scammer… A professional scammer, living on the taxpayer, and living well at that. More, the net result of her work so far has been to help destroy our energy grid and just about everything else relating to our ability to make and do things in Australia. Because cheap and reliable energy is central to everything. Everything. Whether it is coal, gas or liquid fuels, Australia needs these things to provide a first world living standard for the people. She has been an instrumental part of the war on our living standards thus far. All the while they threw our prosperity in the air, put on a blindfold and hoped to catch it in a windmill shaped glove. Now she is in charge of Albanese’s response to our critical, non-critical supply of petrochemicals that are at crisis levels, but we are not in a crisis. If you believe any of what they say… She is not an expert in logistics, or oil supply, petrochemicals or any other area that might qualify her to ensure we have enough fuel to drive critical infrastructure. Not to mention little things like food reaching the supermarket shelves. She is not the right person for the job. She probably thinks we could use this crisis as an opportunity to further destroy lives and livelihoods as they relentlessly pursue the hopeless goal of changing global temperatures. I am sure she will see it that way. She probably thinks we can all work from home and stop eating meat for the good of the planet. I have no doubt Albanese thinks she will do a great job of whatever it is he thinks he is achieving at our expense. I have no doubt we will be worse off for her best efforts. We have good cause to be very cynical of the current leadership. They won’t even admit there are problems - not in any of the areas where there are many problems - so they won’t be able to properly solve them. We have every right to be worried, and we have little cause to respect them or their leadership at this critical time in our nation’s history. I am afraid that if we don’t vote all of these absolute lightweights out of office at the next election, there won’t be a Nation left. I have no doubt there are problems in the opposition and other camps, but they could not be worse than the problems we have in government. I just want Australia back.

Matthew Camenzuli

12,957 views • 5 months ago