Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

What if the biggest breakthrough of 2026 isn’t AI, quantum computing, blockchain or digital currency? What if those are just tools? What if the breakthrough is an idea humanity understood thousands of years ago: HONEST MEASURES. What does a waitress earning $200 in tips have in common with a...

KuwlShow's profile picture

Rob Cunningham

92,429 subscribers

23,985 views • 24 days ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

THE CASTLE, THE KINGDOM & THE FLAG The Hidden War for Money, Truth & Human Freedom ⏱️11 Minutes to Explain the Plan What if the greatest story of our lifetime was never really about politics? What if it was about money? And what if the battle over money was never really about money either - … but about who gets to measure the value of your time, your labor, your property, your freedom…and ultimately, your life? For generations, we inherited a financial kingdom we did not design. We were born inside its walls. We learned its rules. Worked for its currency. Borrowed its debt. Trusted its institutions. Fought its wars. Watched its screens. And rarely asked the simplest question of all: Who built the castle? Now ask another. What if Bitcoin was the Phoenix signaling that the old monetary age was destined to burn? What if gold represents something civilization once understood about honest weights and measures? What if blockchain wasn’t created merely to give us another asset to speculate upon - … but to challenge the very architecture through which value moves? What if XRP, XRPL and ILP represent pieces of an entirely different possibility: not another king… … but a bridge? And what if the strange symbols, breadcrumbs, battles, technologies and political upheavals of the past 100 years are inviting us to examine a much larger story hiding in plain sight? Maybe you believe you already know the answer. Maybe you think the entire proposition is impossible. Good. Because this film isn’t asking you to surrender your judgment. It’s asking you to use it. Come inside the castle. Meet the King. Find the Phoenix. Follow the Bear. Watch the Knight. Study the puppet strings. Find the Purple Flag. And then confront the question that changes everything: What happens to The King’s Castle when humanity discovers it never needed the throne? This is a story about money. And… Power. Gold. Bitcoin. XRP. America. Faith. Technology. Sovereignty. And the ancient struggle between control and human freedom. Don’t watch because I tell you what to believe. Watch because somewhere between what you’ve been told, what you’ve witnessed and what you can independently discover… … there may be a question you haven’t asked yet. And sometimes one question is enough to pull a thread. One thread can unravel an illusion. One truth can change a life. And enough awakened human beings exercising knowledge, understanding, wisdom and free will … … can change the world. Welcome to - THE CASTLE, THE KINGDOM & THE FLAG Enter curious. {Q}uestion everything. Leave sovereign. X President Donald J. Trump #BTC #XRP #USD Treasury Department Ripple Federal Reserve City of London
11:27

THE CASTLE, THE KINGDOM & THE FLAG The Hidden War for Money, Truth & Human Freedom ⏱️11 Minutes to Explain the Plan What if the greatest story of our lifetime was never really about politics? What if it was about money? And what if the battle over money was never really about money either - … but about who gets to measure the value of your time, your labor, your property, your freedom…and ultimately, your life? For generations, we inherited a financial kingdom we did not design. We were born inside its walls. We learned its rules. Worked for its currency. Borrowed its debt. Trusted its institutions. Fought its wars. Watched its screens. And rarely asked the simplest question of all: Who built the castle? Now ask another. What if Bitcoin was the Phoenix signaling that the old monetary age was destined to burn? What if gold represents something civilization once understood about honest weights and measures? What if blockchain wasn’t created merely to give us another asset to speculate upon - … but to challenge the very architecture through which value moves? What if XRP, XRPL and ILP represent pieces of an entirely different possibility: not another king… … but a bridge? And what if the strange symbols, breadcrumbs, battles, technologies and political upheavals of the past 100 years are inviting us to examine a much larger story hiding in plain sight? Maybe you believe you already know the answer. Maybe you think the entire proposition is impossible. Good. Because this film isn’t asking you to surrender your judgment. It’s asking you to use it. Come inside the castle. Meet the King. Find the Phoenix. Follow the Bear. Watch the Knight. Study the puppet strings. Find the Purple Flag. And then confront the question that changes everything: What happens to The King’s Castle when humanity discovers it never needed the throne? This is a story about money. And… Power. Gold. Bitcoin. XRP. America. Faith. Technology. Sovereignty. And the ancient struggle between control and human freedom. Don’t watch because I tell you what to believe. Watch because somewhere between what you’ve been told, what you’ve witnessed and what you can independently discover… … there may be a question you haven’t asked yet. And sometimes one question is enough to pull a thread. One thread can unravel an illusion. One truth can change a life. And enough awakened human beings exercising knowledge, understanding, wisdom and free will … … can change the world. Welcome to - THE CASTLE, THE KINGDOM & THE FLAG Enter curious. {Q}uestion everything. Leave sovereign. X President Donald J. Trump #BTC #XRP #USD Treasury Department Ripple Federal Reserve City of London

Rob Cunningham

33,842 views • 22 days ago

AI isn’t just changing tools, it’s widening the wealth gap. Most people interact with AI every day without realizing how much value their work, data, and behavior create behind the scenes for billion-dollar tech companies. As automation scales, the real question isn’t whether AI will affect jobs. It’s who controls the systems that shape that impact. Something has to change. Action Model is exploring what happens when that value is pooled, shared, and owned collectively instead of concentrated at the top. Strength in numbers isn’t a slogan, it’s a system design choice. Join the resistance and sign up to Action Model today. Link is in our bio.
0:53

AI isn’t just changing tools, it’s widening the wealth gap. Most people interact with AI every day without realizing how much value their work, data, and behavior create behind the scenes for billion-dollar tech companies. As automation scales, the real question isn’t whether AI will affect jobs. It’s who controls the systems that shape that impact. Something has to change. Action Model is exploring what happens when that value is pooled, shared, and owned collectively instead of concentrated at the top. Strength in numbers isn’t a slogan, it’s a system design choice. Join the resistance and sign up to Action Model today. Link is in our bio.

Action Model

14,090 views • 7 months ago

🧵“What underpins a world order is always the financial system." Pippa Malmgren, World Government Summit Dubai, 2022. This is from my new article: "We are on the brink of a dramatic change where we are about to abandon the traditional system of money and accounting and introduce a new one. And the new one is what we call blockchain. It means digital. It means having an almost perfect record of every single transaction that happens in the economy, which will give us far greater clarity over what's going on. It also raises huge dangers in terms of the balance of power between states and citizens. In my opinion, we're going to need a digital constitution of human rights if we're going to have digital money. Most people think that digital money is crypto and private, but what I see are superpowers introducing digital currency. The Chinese were the first. The US is on the brink of moving in the same direction. The Europeans have committed to that as well.” >>
1:43

🧵“What underpins a world order is always the financial system." Pippa Malmgren, World Government Summit Dubai, 2022. This is from my new article: "We are on the brink of a dramatic change where we are about to abandon the traditional system of money and accounting and introduce a new one. And the new one is what we call blockchain. It means digital. It means having an almost perfect record of every single transaction that happens in the economy, which will give us far greater clarity over what's going on. It also raises huge dangers in terms of the balance of power between states and citizens. In my opinion, we're going to need a digital constitution of human rights if we're going to have digital money. Most people think that digital money is crypto and private, but what I see are superpowers introducing digital currency. The Chinese were the first. The US is on the brink of moving in the same direction. The Europeans have committed to that as well.” >>

Efrat Fenigson

32,585 views • 2 years ago

63% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck. And as AI begins changing the way we work, millions of people are asking the same question: Will this technology create more opportunity, or make the divide even bigger? David Friedberg believes the answer depends on how we understand and use AI and that history gives us a reason to be optimistic. David is a scientist-entrepreneur who built a $1.1 billion company by combining science, technology and business. He has spent his career trying to understand how innovation can solve some of humanity’s biggest problems. After founding The Climate Corporation, a company that transformed farming technology before being acquired by Bayer, he’s now focused on the future of AI, biology and the technologies that could define the next era of human progress. We discussed things like: - How a wave of socialism could come to America by 2028 - Why AI might create more opportunity instead of destroying work - Previous technology revolutions that changed jobs rather than eliminating humans - How AI could transform healthcare, food and science. - Why he believes we underestimate what humans are capable of - What happens when technology becomes cheaper and available to everyone David doesn’t look at AI through fear or hype. He looks at it through the lens of history, economics and human potential. And one thing became clear during this conversation: AI isn’t just going to change the jobs we do - it could change the way we think about work, wealth and opportunity. If technology creates more abundance than ever before, the biggest question becomes: who benefits from it? David offers a perspective on AI that challenges one of the biggest fears surrounding the future of work. Out now on all platforms 👊🏾❤️
1:30

63% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck. And as AI begins changing the way we work, millions of people are asking the same question: Will this technology create more opportunity, or make the divide even bigger? David Friedberg believes the answer depends on how we understand and use AI and that history gives us a reason to be optimistic. David is a scientist-entrepreneur who built a $1.1 billion company by combining science, technology and business. He has spent his career trying to understand how innovation can solve some of humanity’s biggest problems. After founding The Climate Corporation, a company that transformed farming technology before being acquired by Bayer, he’s now focused on the future of AI, biology and the technologies that could define the next era of human progress. We discussed things like: - How a wave of socialism could come to America by 2028 - Why AI might create more opportunity instead of destroying work - Previous technology revolutions that changed jobs rather than eliminating humans - How AI could transform healthcare, food and science. - Why he believes we underestimate what humans are capable of - What happens when technology becomes cheaper and available to everyone David doesn’t look at AI through fear or hype. He looks at it through the lens of history, economics and human potential. And one thing became clear during this conversation: AI isn’t just going to change the jobs we do - it could change the way we think about work, wealth and opportunity. If technology creates more abundance than ever before, the biggest question becomes: who benefits from it? David offers a perspective on AI that challenges one of the biggest fears surrounding the future of work. Out now on all platforms 👊🏾❤️

Steven Bartlett

18,690 views • 11 days ago

AI progress is outpacing our ability to control it… because control ISN’T keeping up with capability. One of the people raising that concern is Yoshua Bengio. He’s one of the founding figures of artificial intelligence, a Turing Award winner, and one of the most-cited scientists in the world. His work helped lay the foundations for the deep-learning systems now powering today’s AI boom. AI is moving fast (faster than regulation and public understanding). What worries Yoshua isn’t progress itself. It’s how quickly powerful systems are being deployed without a clear way to align them with human values, or to control what happens when they behave in unexpected ways.
1:28

AI progress is outpacing our ability to control it… because control ISN’T keeping up with capability. One of the people raising that concern is Yoshua Bengio. He’s one of the founding figures of artificial intelligence, a Turing Award winner, and one of the most-cited scientists in the world. His work helped lay the foundations for the deep-learning systems now powering today’s AI boom. AI is moving fast (faster than regulation and public understanding). What worries Yoshua isn’t progress itself. It’s how quickly powerful systems are being deployed without a clear way to align them with human values, or to control what happens when they behave in unexpected ways.

Steven Bartlett

26,577 views • 8 months ago

Zohran Mamdani on his vision for the future of the Democratic Party: “When we think about the New Deal, when we think about what we could deliver and the scale of what we deliver for working people, that’s what we have to bring back to our politics because for too long it’s felt as if politics is a hobby for those who can afford to have it not something that could deliver a better life for those who are being priced out of one today”
0:49

Zohran Mamdani on his vision for the future of the Democratic Party: “When we think about the New Deal, when we think about what we could deliver and the scale of what we deliver for working people, that’s what we have to bring back to our politics because for too long it’s felt as if politics is a hobby for those who can afford to have it not something that could deliver a better life for those who are being priced out of one today”

Really American 🇺🇸

19,386 views • 29 days ago

"If we are to master our machines, rather than be mastered by them, we must recognise 'identity' for what it is—the dead byproduct of applying our technologies to ourselves." People say technology is driving identity politics and that AI is giving humanity an identity crisis. But in the age of digital avatars and augmented reality, Mary Harrington asks whether the concept of identity is useful at all. Maybe the time has come to acknowledge that there is more to being human… to remember the soul…
17:50

"If we are to master our machines, rather than be mastered by them, we must recognise 'identity' for what it is—the dead byproduct of applying our technologies to ourselves." People say technology is driving identity politics and that AI is giving humanity an identity crisis. But in the age of digital avatars and augmented reality, Mary Harrington asks whether the concept of identity is useful at all. Maybe the time has come to acknowledge that there is more to being human… to remember the soul…

The Alliance for Responsible Citizenship

13,234 views • 1 year ago

Zack Polanski, "The problem is chaining yourself to an economic system that is so fundamentally broken" "You don't get marks or points for just being good, a gold star for doing the basics, or even just under the necessary" "We are at this urgent moment in our history where the only thing that is acceptable is what is required" "What is required is to reduce our emissions, to invest in climate adaptation, to protect nature in one of the most nature depleted countries in the world" "And to make sure we're reinvigorating communities with the truth and putting them in charge" "What is the biggest tool we have?" "It is our shared humanity" "Tackling the cost of living crisis is the same solution as tackling the climate crisis" "It's so vital at this budget that we're cutting bills and taxing billionaires" "There's an implication that all of this is transactional, and the only thing people care about is the money in their pockets" "If you're struggling, that probably is the only thing you care about" "But for so many people, they care about the future of this planet. About clean air. Green spaces" "That when people go to work they have a shared sense of purpose, that it is meaningful and that they are contributing something to society" "We are in a crisis. Climate. Equality. Air pollution. Identity. All of these problems are all interlinked" "And it all comes down to our communities and our humanity"
3:20

Zack Polanski, "The problem is chaining yourself to an economic system that is so fundamentally broken" "You don't get marks or points for just being good, a gold star for doing the basics, or even just under the necessary" "We are at this urgent moment in our history where the only thing that is acceptable is what is required" "What is required is to reduce our emissions, to invest in climate adaptation, to protect nature in one of the most nature depleted countries in the world" "And to make sure we're reinvigorating communities with the truth and putting them in charge" "What is the biggest tool we have?" "It is our shared humanity" "Tackling the cost of living crisis is the same solution as tackling the climate crisis" "It's so vital at this budget that we're cutting bills and taxing billionaires" "There's an implication that all of this is transactional, and the only thing people care about is the money in their pockets" "If you're struggling, that probably is the only thing you care about" "But for so many people, they care about the future of this planet. About clean air. Green spaces" "That when people go to work they have a shared sense of purpose, that it is meaningful and that they are contributing something to society" "We are in a crisis. Climate. Equality. Air pollution. Identity. All of these problems are all interlinked" "And it all comes down to our communities and our humanity"

Farrukh

205,138 views • 9 months ago

We all know AI is the future of technology. But almost nobody will OWN the technology shaping that future. The AI race is already underway. Billions are being invested. Companies are moving fast. AI is already reshaping entire industries. But when all this value gets created…Who actually benefits? Right now, mostly a handful of billionaires and Big Tech companies. We don’t think that’s fair. If AI is being built on the data, behavior, and contributions of ordinary people… Then ordinary people should share in the value it creates. That’s exactly what we’re building at Action Model: A future where AI is owned by the people, not just the few at the top.
0:25

We all know AI is the future of technology. But almost nobody will OWN the technology shaping that future. The AI race is already underway. Billions are being invested. Companies are moving fast. AI is already reshaping entire industries. But when all this value gets created…Who actually benefits? Right now, mostly a handful of billionaires and Big Tech companies. We don’t think that’s fair. If AI is being built on the data, behavior, and contributions of ordinary people… Then ordinary people should share in the value it creates. That’s exactly what we’re building at Action Model: A future where AI is owned by the people, not just the few at the top.

Action Model

21,354 views • 3 months ago

When I say that Bitcoin is a currency of distrust, I'm just repeating what Bitcoin fans themselves say. There may be good reasons not to trust the banks and governments that create dollars, yens, and other currencies – but that doesn’t change the fact that the preference for Bitcoin is based on distrust of human institutions. Why is this an alarming development? Because the whole purpose of money is to create trust between strangers. Financial devices like currencies, bonds and shares – 90% of which are just data in computers – build trust between millions of strangers, who can then pool their knowledge and resources together, and cooperate. Humans control the world because we learned to do this. If we now lose trust in human institutions, this will limit the amount of money and handicap economic activity and cooperation. I hope that humanity finds a way to build trustworthy human institutions, instead of adopting technologies of distrust. #bitcoin #trust #distrust #crypto #currency #humanity #institutions #money #finance
2:34

When I say that Bitcoin is a currency of distrust, I'm just repeating what Bitcoin fans themselves say. There may be good reasons not to trust the banks and governments that create dollars, yens, and other currencies – but that doesn’t change the fact that the preference for Bitcoin is based on distrust of human institutions. Why is this an alarming development? Because the whole purpose of money is to create trust between strangers. Financial devices like currencies, bonds and shares – 90% of which are just data in computers – build trust between millions of strangers, who can then pool their knowledge and resources together, and cooperate. Humans control the world because we learned to do this. If we now lose trust in human institutions, this will limit the amount of money and handicap economic activity and cooperation. I hope that humanity finds a way to build trustworthy human institutions, instead of adopting technologies of distrust. #bitcoin #trust #distrust #crypto #currency #humanity #institutions #money #finance

Yuval Noah Harari

1,508,826 views • 2 years ago

"Internally, we don't set ARR metrics." - Replit CEO Amjad Masad Amjad says focusing on ARR is "optimizing for the wrong thing." Instead, they look at metrics like sentiment and how much money their customers are making: "In the age of AI, I don't think about ARR the same way a SaaS business does, because you're selling tokens. You can push a bug and get better ARR because [customers] are spending more tokens." "We're increasingly looking at how much money people are generating when they're building a business with Replit, because now you can hook in Stripe and other payment providers." "When people get angry, they'll tell the agents they're angry. We look at that a lot." "It's really about what you measure. We're trying to measure the quality of the output, as opposed to whatever ARR metric there is."
1:16

"Internally, we don't set ARR metrics." - Replit CEO Amjad Masad Amjad says focusing on ARR is "optimizing for the wrong thing." Instead, they look at metrics like sentiment and how much money their customers are making: "In the age of AI, I don't think about ARR the same way a SaaS business does, because you're selling tokens. You can push a bug and get better ARR because [customers] are spending more tokens." "We're increasingly looking at how much money people are generating when they're building a business with Replit, because now you can hook in Stripe and other payment providers." "When people get angry, they'll tell the agents they're angry. We look at that a lot." "It's really about what you measure. We're trying to measure the quality of the output, as opposed to whatever ARR metric there is."

TBPN

48,232 views • 6 months ago

Sequoia's Ravi Gupta and Pat Grady on potential layoffs and why the AI doomers are wrong: "Technology is neither good nor bad, it's what we do with it. The same technology that powers a nuclear bomb can power a nuclear power plant." "A lot of what people are doing when they go and talk about the technology is they talk about all the things that might happen. I would rather us talk about the fact that it's going to get more and more powerful, and it's more and more incumbent on all of us to make sure we use it for something great." "If I could give my kids one thing, it wouldn't be kindness. It wouldn't be curiosity. It would be agency. The technology is going to be what all of us make of it."
2:04

Sequoia's Ravi Gupta and Pat Grady on potential layoffs and why the AI doomers are wrong: "Technology is neither good nor bad, it's what we do with it. The same technology that powers a nuclear bomb can power a nuclear power plant." "A lot of what people are doing when they go and talk about the technology is they talk about all the things that might happen. I would rather us talk about the fact that it's going to get more and more powerful, and it's more and more incumbent on all of us to make sure we use it for something great." "If I could give my kids one thing, it wouldn't be kindness. It wouldn't be curiosity. It would be agency. The technology is going to be what all of us make of it."

TBPN

21,055 views • 8 months ago

VanEck CEO Jan van Eck on CNBC: “There’s something else going on within the Bitcoin community that non-crypto people need to know about. And that is: ultimately, VanEck has been around before Bitcoin. We will walk away from Bitcoin if we think the thesis is fundamentally broken. We don’t right now, but you always have to look at the underlying technology and the crypto. What the Bitcoin community has been asking itself is: Is there enough encryption in Bitcoin, because quantum computing is coming? And secondly: Is there enough privacy in Bitcoin? And so a lot of Bitcoin OGs or maxis have been looking at Zcash. Zcash is a token. It’s sort of related to Bitcoin with a lot more privacy. The kind of garbage that we got about Bitcoin four years ago was: ‘It’s used for all bad illicit behavior.’ But now everyone kind of realizes that when you move money around on the Bitcoin blockchain, you can see it. You can see it move from one wallet to another. And a lot of people are looking for more privacy.”
1:00

VanEck CEO Jan van Eck on CNBC: “There’s something else going on within the Bitcoin community that non-crypto people need to know about. And that is: ultimately, VanEck has been around before Bitcoin. We will walk away from Bitcoin if we think the thesis is fundamentally broken. We don’t right now, but you always have to look at the underlying technology and the crypto. What the Bitcoin community has been asking itself is: Is there enough encryption in Bitcoin, because quantum computing is coming? And secondly: Is there enough privacy in Bitcoin? And so a lot of Bitcoin OGs or maxis have been looking at Zcash. Zcash is a token. It’s sort of related to Bitcoin with a lot more privacy. The kind of garbage that we got about Bitcoin four years ago was: ‘It’s used for all bad illicit behavior.’ But now everyone kind of realizes that when you move money around on the Bitcoin blockchain, you can see it. You can see it move from one wallet to another. And a lot of people are looking for more privacy.”

Arjun Khemani

590,523 views • 9 months ago

THE LAST OBJECT Every scene was done only with AI tools! The entire workflow can be found in the comments The short film explores one of humanity’s deepest contemporary challenges: the risk of losing what makes us human in a world increasingly shaped by artificial logic and automated systems. In a post-human, frozen landscape, the most human gesture — the transmission of memory, affection, and sacrifice — is carried out by a machine. This is not just a story about artificial intelligence, but about consciousness, identity, and empathy in the absence of humanity. At a time when technology evolves faster than our emotional understanding of it, the film asks: Can we teach machines what it means to be alive, or are they the ones reminding us? Kling AI Midjourney #AIWorkflow #aivideos
3:57

THE LAST OBJECT Every scene was done only with AI tools! The entire workflow can be found in the comments The short film explores one of humanity’s deepest contemporary challenges: the risk of losing what makes us human in a world increasingly shaped by artificial logic and automated systems. In a post-human, frozen landscape, the most human gesture — the transmission of memory, affection, and sacrifice — is carried out by a machine. This is not just a story about artificial intelligence, but about consciousness, identity, and empathy in the absence of humanity. At a time when technology evolves faster than our emotional understanding of it, the film asks: Can we teach machines what it means to be alive, or are they the ones reminding us? Kling AI Midjourney #AIWorkflow #aivideos

Alessandro Risuleo

13,497 views • 1 year ago

Here is a video that challenges our understanding of human intelligence and progress. Judging by the ancient images, it seems that we are not so unique when it comes to technology. The poses of people reminiscent of using tablets and the drawings depicting car-like vehicles and aeroplanes suggest that all this existed in the past? We may not be the first to have achieved such technological progress. What if other civilisations had already travelled the same path of development and thinking that we are going through now? It is very likely that we are just a repeated link in an infinite chain. History, as we know, is often rewritten and we only have fragments of knowledge of the past. Think about it, what if all that we consider our own achievement was actually the path of ancient knowledge and technology undertaken by someone else, which we are rediscovering for ourselves?😉
0:44

Here is a video that challenges our understanding of human intelligence and progress. Judging by the ancient images, it seems that we are not so unique when it comes to technology. The poses of people reminiscent of using tablets and the drawings depicting car-like vehicles and aeroplanes suggest that all this existed in the past? We may not be the first to have achieved such technological progress. What if other civilisations had already travelled the same path of development and thinking that we are going through now? It is very likely that we are just a repeated link in an infinite chain. History, as we know, is often rewritten and we only have fragments of knowledge of the past. Think about it, what if all that we consider our own achievement was actually the path of ancient knowledge and technology undertaken by someone else, which we are rediscovering for ourselves?😉

Andy

61,959 views • 3 months ago

Responsible AI should not feel like the path of most resistance. That was the strongest idea from my SAS Innovate conversation with Reggie Townsend, leading Data Ethics, Governance, and Social Impact at SAS Software. Reggie framed governance not as a compliance layer, but as a way to scale human judgment. Too often, we innovate first and govern later. Model selected. Agent deployed. Process built. Then governance arrives at the end and feels like friction. Bolt it on after the fact, and resistance is guaranteed. The opportunity: design responsible AI, so it becomes intuitive, action-oriented, and useful in the flow of work. That is what Reggie meant by making responsibility "irresistible." Second point: Use cases must lead. When everyone can access the same models, differentiation will not come from the technology. It will come from how leaders define outcomes, govern applications, and connect business value to institutional trust. The risk does not live in the model. The value does not live in the model. Both live in the use case. For CEOs and boards, this is the shift: from model-first oversight to outcome-first accountability. Better questions before scaling AI: - What human decision are we shaping? - What business outcome are we improving? - What risk are we containing? - What judgment are we extending? Responsible AI becomes strategic when it helps people make better decisions, faster, with greater confidence. Most leaders can't see where governance sits inside their AI operating model. SAS AI Navigator makes it visible: Design for the human. Not only the technology.
5:12

Responsible AI should not feel like the path of most resistance. That was the strongest idea from my SAS Innovate conversation with Reggie Townsend, leading Data Ethics, Governance, and Social Impact at SAS Software. Reggie framed governance not as a compliance layer, but as a way to scale human judgment. Too often, we innovate first and govern later. Model selected. Agent deployed. Process built. Then governance arrives at the end and feels like friction. Bolt it on after the fact, and resistance is guaranteed. The opportunity: design responsible AI, so it becomes intuitive, action-oriented, and useful in the flow of work. That is what Reggie meant by making responsibility "irresistible." Second point: Use cases must lead. When everyone can access the same models, differentiation will not come from the technology. It will come from how leaders define outcomes, govern applications, and connect business value to institutional trust. The risk does not live in the model. The value does not live in the model. Both live in the use case. For CEOs and boards, this is the shift: from model-first oversight to outcome-first accountability. Better questions before scaling AI: - What human decision are we shaping? - What business outcome are we improving? - What risk are we containing? - What judgment are we extending? Responsible AI becomes strategic when it helps people make better decisions, faster, with greater confidence. Most leaders can't see where governance sits inside their AI operating model. SAS AI Navigator makes it visible: Design for the human. Not only the technology.

Sabine VanderLinden

835,838 views • 3 months ago

Tucker Carlson Warns: Endless War Is the Perfect Excuse for Total Surveillance Generation after generation of conflict makes cruelty feel normal, dulls our reaction to human suffering, and turns once-unthinkable acts into everyday policy. History shows the pattern: in wartime, governments rarely give up power. They grab more. They roll out mass surveillance, tighten controls on speech, smear dissent as “unpatriotic,” and expand police and intelligence powers in the name of security. Now, with AI and digital tech layered on top of that, those same wartime tools are being supercharged. From algorithmic monitoring to automated data tracking and new systems of social control that don’t turn off when the shooting stops. So the real question isn’t just what war does abroad, but what it does at home: how much freedom are people willing to trade for the promise of safety, and what happens when “temporary” emergency powers become the permanent operating system? We dig into all of this, and what it means for the future of civil liberties in an age of endless conflict and AI surveillance, with Tucker Carlson.
5:24

Tucker Carlson Warns: Endless War Is the Perfect Excuse for Total Surveillance Generation after generation of conflict makes cruelty feel normal, dulls our reaction to human suffering, and turns once-unthinkable acts into everyday policy. History shows the pattern: in wartime, governments rarely give up power. They grab more. They roll out mass surveillance, tighten controls on speech, smear dissent as “unpatriotic,” and expand police and intelligence powers in the name of security. Now, with AI and digital tech layered on top of that, those same wartime tools are being supercharged. From algorithmic monitoring to automated data tracking and new systems of social control that don’t turn off when the shooting stops. So the real question isn’t just what war does abroad, but what it does at home: how much freedom are people willing to trade for the promise of safety, and what happens when “temporary” emergency powers become the permanent operating system? We dig into all of this, and what it means for the future of civil liberties in an age of endless conflict and AI surveillance, with Tucker Carlson.

Redacted

34,313 views • 2 months ago

Black Mirror: It's Closer Than You Think One of the most memorable scenes in Black Mirror's “Nosedive” is that Lacie's digital social ranking isn't simply a reflection of how other people see her. It determines what she can access. When her score drops, she finds that it can affect everything from the car she can rent to whether she can get on a flight. The episode raises a very real question about what happens when digital systems become the gateway to everyday life. The more aspects of our lives depend on a single digital infrastructure, the more important it becomes to have alternatives when that system isn't available — or when we don't want to participate in it. That is part of the reason cash matters. Digital payments are convenient, but they shouldn't have to be the only way we can transact. Cash gives people another option that doesn't depend on a digital account, a payment network or a particular technology. We don't need to reject digital payments to recognise the value of keeping cash. The important thing is making sure that convenience doesn't eventually become the removal of choice. Cash is one of the few alternatives we still have, and keeping it available means keeping that choice available. Cash Freedom 2026: Subscribe to
2:52

Black Mirror: It's Closer Than You Think One of the most memorable scenes in Black Mirror's “Nosedive” is that Lacie's digital social ranking isn't simply a reflection of how other people see her. It determines what she can access. When her score drops, she finds that it can affect everything from the car she can rent to whether she can get on a flight. The episode raises a very real question about what happens when digital systems become the gateway to everyday life. The more aspects of our lives depend on a single digital infrastructure, the more important it becomes to have alternatives when that system isn't available — or when we don't want to participate in it. That is part of the reason cash matters. Digital payments are convenient, but they shouldn't have to be the only way we can transact. Cash gives people another option that doesn't depend on a digital account, a payment network or a particular technology. We don't need to reject digital payments to recognise the value of keeping cash. The important thing is making sure that convenience doesn't eventually become the removal of choice. Cash is one of the few alternatives we still have, and keeping it available means keeping that choice available. Cash Freedom 2026: Subscribe to

The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts

50,952 views • 6 days ago