Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
What if we backtested the digital credit / perpetual preferred equity model by inserting it into Bitcoin’s actual price history at the start of 2015? I modeled a hypothetical Bitcoin treasury company with: 1. $100M of common equity 2. $100M of 11% perpetual preferred equity 3. $200M of Bitcoin... show more
12,981 просмотров • 10 дней назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 15

Perp prefs are a liability without a clock. Genius invention.

@EthanKasner_ Soooo what you are saying is we are good

I agree but most investors will not put up with deferred dividend payments during bear markets.

Treasury math is getting harder to ignore. The interesting part is the preference for equity over debt, because Bitcoin keeps turning time into the cleanest balance sheet.

The drawdowns are nastier

Aint time the greatest lever though

perp-pref coupon never ends, so every BTC drawdown compounds the issuer's liability. A fixed-term GMSLA-style BTC facility is a different shape: maturity, defined hold, no perpetual overhang. The term cap stops the ratchet.

Two other big differences are likely in the future: BTC draw downs likely won’t be as deep. The rate of money printing and currency debasement will likely be higher, which is an even greater lifting force to nominal BTC price in USD.

Outstanding Adam..thank you

Why majority of BTC Treasuries have failed and only those well run and with Preferred (or at least one planned!) will succeed Why I hold MSTR, ASST and SWC

🤯

This post will age very well

The time structure is what excites me here, Adam. I want common shareholders to capture Bitcoin upside without a refinancing clock forcing a sale into a crash. That makes the actual dividend deferral terms just as important as the headline yield.

Great analysis as always. Your backtesting cuts through the noise. You and @mozlyxy are my go to finance accounts.

Without any mNAV expansion modeled either which of course will happen and only make the structure stronger. Insane 🤯
