Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

What if your Trading App could automatically mark up Chart Patterns for you? Would that be magical? :) This is possible only because we built our tech stack inhouse, rather than rely on 3rd party charting components. It took time to get these components built out in a modular...

5,195,601 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

13 Kommentare

Profilbild von Saurabh
Saurabhvor 1 Monat

Try adding automation feature like buy when supertrend breaks and exit when it breaks down something basic like this

Profilbild von Madeactual
Madeactualvor 1 Monat

Owning the charting layer is the unglamorous part that makes the fun part possible. Third-party components are fine until the feature you actually want lives one layer below the API they expose, and then you are filing a ticket instead of shipping. The tradeoff is real though: you now own the rendering bugs forever. Worth it when the component is the product, not worth it when it is decoration.

Profilbild von Marjorie
Marjorievor 1 Monat

Built in-house? Chef's kiss 🤌 Takes guts + cash. Risky but worth it if it slaps. #TradingTech

Profilbild von notsosure
notsosurevor 1 Monat

Lol, perfect example of a solution trying to find a problem. Believe me it literally takes 5 seconds to draw these trendlines or channels. Whereas - 10-15 seconds for prompt and another 20 seconds for the AI to analyse and then draw it.

Profilbild von Happyk
Happykvor 1 Monat

Thank you .one of the best platform .amazing UI ,speed ,chart don’t stuck . Congratulations to your team .Best platform.

Profilbild von Bruce
Brucevor 1 Monat

Agar @Sahi_HQ me equity delivery free hoti to ye industry ka best broker hota...

Profilbild von Charting Ninja
Charting Ninjavor 1 Monat

This is interesting. We will try it out today. Hopefully, the indicator issue is solved soon.

Profilbild von Allu Saleem 37
Allu Saleem 37vor 1 Monat

What is growth

Profilbild von Mr.Dag🧢
Mr.Dag🧢vor 1 Monat

Follow ✅ 🔁get follow back ✅

Profilbild von Amit Nikhade
Amit Nikhadevor 1 Monat

The in-house call is the interesting part. Most teams take the third-party component to ship faster and then can't do exactly this kind of thing three years later. Slow decision that only pays off once.

Profilbild von Web3 Storm 🌐
Web3 Storm 🌐vor 1 Monat

Let’s talk🗣️ DM Us ✨

Profilbild von Farooqui Sen
Farooqui Senvor 1 Monat

.

Profilbild von Tanmay mandal
Tanmay mandalvor 1 Monat

i want to contribute

Ähnliche Videos

jensen spitting bars "So, China is the largest contributor to open source software in the world. Fact. Right? China's the largest contributor to open models in the world. Fact. Today it's built on the American tech stack Nvidia. Fact. All five layers of the tech stack for AI is important. United States ought to go win all five of them. They're all important. The one that is the most important, of course, is the AI application layer. The layer that diffuses into society, the one that uses it most will benefit from this industrial revolution most. But my point is that every layer has to succeed. If we scare this country into thinking that AI is somehow a nuclear bomb so that everybody hates AI and everybody's afraid of AI, I don't know how you're helping the United States. You're doing a disservice. If we scare everybody out of doing software engineering jobs because it's going to kill every software engineering job and we don't have any software engineers as a result of that, we're doing a disservice to United States. If we scare everybody out of radiology so nobody wants to be a radiologist because computer vision is completely free and no AI is going to do a worse job than radiologists and we misunderstand the difference between a job and a task. The job of a radiologist, patient care, task to read a scan. If we misunderstand that so profoundly and we scare everybody out of going to radiology school, we're not going to have enough radiologists and good enough healthcare. So I'm making the case that when you make a premise that is so extreme, everything goes from zero or infinity. We end up scaring people in a way that's just not true. Life is not like that. Do we want United States to be first? Of course we do. Do we need to be a leader in every layer of that stack? Of course we do. Of course we do. Is today you're talking about Mythos because Mythos is important? Sure, that's fantastic, but in a few years time, I'm making you the prediction that when we want the American tech stack, when we want American technology to be diffused around the world, out to India, out to the Middle East, out to Africa, out to Southeast Asia, when our country would like to export because we would like to export our technology, we would like to export our standards. On that day, I want you and I to have that same conversation again, and I will tell you exactly about today's conversation, about how your policy and what you imagined literally caused the United States to concede the second largest market in the world for no good reason at all. We shouldn't concede it. If we lose it, we lose it, but why do we concede it? Now nobody is advocating, nobody is advocating an all or nothing. Nobody is advocating all or nothing, meaning we ship everything to China at all times. Nobody's advocating that. We should always have the best technology here. We should always have the most technology here and the first, but we should also try to compete and win around the world. Both of those things can simultaneously happen. It requires some amount of nuance, some amount of maturity instead of absolutes. The world is just not absolutes."

mark erdmann

13,279 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten