Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

What is the Spacetime Aether? Conventional physics would claim that space is an empty vacuum. It discounts the 'Zero-Point Energy' (ZPE) constantly fluctuating in and out of existence. The Casimir force shows us there is a latent negative energy pressure when we put two parallel plates close to one...

92,416 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

Mo₿erg 'Mo' 𐤊's profile picture
Mo₿erg 'Mo' 𐤊2 years ago

If you are digging so much into aether, you surely know that all these old world buildings were in fact harvesting the energy. It's since then been taken from us, but you probably knew that already. @88marciaramalho did an eye opening on documentary on the topic. Never will you see the old world in the same light.

Ashton Forbes's profile picture
Ashton Forbes2 years ago

@88marciaramalho Like the pyramids? I feel like the power plant theory is practically the leading theory now. No way was that thing a tomb.

🐰's profile picture
🐰2 years ago

This is the most sensible theory and explanation I've heard in years. It could basically still preserve the current laws of thermodynamics, but additionally there could be a new way to draw from a virtually infinite energy source which is the vast 'emptiness' of space...

Ashton Forbes's profile picture
Ashton Forbes2 years ago

Precisely. We don’t even have to completely rewrite the laws of thermodynamics. Just reinterpret them.

Pacman vs's profile picture
Pacman vs2 years ago

Don’t you find it mind boggling that you started this denouncing a weird state crime… and now you’re what? The loudest voice in modern physics globally? Any chance they eventually make you pick who you’ll end up being?

Shelnutt's profile picture
Shelnutt2 years ago

Is this similar to what Terrence Howard was explaining to Rogan?

Ashton Forbes's profile picture
Ashton Forbes2 years ago

Yes. I almost reference Terrence Howard but decided to keep it more brief. When he's talking about the in-folded/out-folded geometry I think he's talking about the interaction of the Aether with what we see (mass). I'll probably do another video on Phase Conjugation and radars.

𝓡𝓮𝓭𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓣𝓱𝓮𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓽's profile picture
𝓡𝓮𝓭𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓣𝓱𝓮𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓽2 years ago

Exotic particles might as well be the modern Æther, just with additional complexities😅

Ashton Forbes's profile picture
Ashton Forbes2 years ago

Aether with extra steps. Rick and Morty is predictive programming.

DualitySync's profile picture
DualitySync2 years ago

Great Explanation

Ashton Forbes's profile picture
Ashton Forbes2 years ago

Thanks! 🙏I hope it made sense. I'm getting bolder the more science I learn.

Related Videos

David Kipping on why building AI megastructures might be the strongest evidence that we're alone in the universe: The argument starts with something we can already observe: how much energy AI consumes. "One thing we see already with these AI models is how energy hungry they are." P(David|Kipping) ∝ P(Kipping|David) P(David) extrapolates from there. If the only purpose of these data centers is to compute as much as possible as fast as possible, then they'll demand vast amounts of energy. And the orbital data centers that billionaires are getting excited about wouldn't be invisible to us. He explains that such structures would leave a detectable signature: "We should probably see that in James Webb. We could probably already put limits on the existence of essentially artificial rings... emitting a lot of infrared because they're warm." Then comes the unsettling turn. If humanity can build these machines, so could anyone else. And that carries a dark implication. "But if we make that breakthrough, I think the biggest point is it seems to imply that we are alone. Because if we can do it, surely someone else could have done it." This connects to what he refers to as Hart's Fact A. The strange observation that everything we look at in the cosmos appears completely natural: "Everything about the universe: we see stars, galaxies, clouds of plasma. Everything is consistent with nature. There's no hint anywhere of anything artificial, no engineering, nothing in the whole universe. As far as we can see, that's true. That is weird." The more powerful the technology we can imagine, the worse that silence looks. Dyson spheres everywhere, colonising wherever they want, faster-than-light spaceships if any of that is achievable, the sky should be full of evidence. It isn't. "It just massively exacerbates the Fermi paradox to the point where you'd probably conclude this is it." His honest conclusion: "It would make me even more pessimistic about the probabilities of intelligent life in the universe."

High Signal AI

10,431 views • 3 months ago

Ever hear Albert Einstein’s voice? He’s him explaining his formula, E=mc² It is probably the most famous formula in the world, but what exactly does it mean? Let's start by defining each letter in the formula: E = Energy M = Mass C = Speed of light (a very large number) If we were to read the formula, we would say, "Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared." The formula itself is rather simple in that it essentially says that energy and mass are different forms of the same thing; they are interchangeable. So are you saying a beam of light and a banana are different forms of the same thing? Yes, in our head, this may not make sense, but it does in nature. This discovery was groundbreaking at the time because people had previously believed that energy could only be created by kinetic or potential energy. You can increase kinetic energy by accelerating your car. You can increase potential energy by stretching a rubber band. Einstein demonstrated that there was a third form, which is that things have energy because they simply exist. Ok, so why is mass multiplied by the speed of light? Whenever you are converting mass to pure energy, it is by nature moving at the speed of light. Pure energy is an electromagnetic radiation, which travels at 186,000 miles/sec (300,000 km/sec). Ok, cool, but why is the speed of light squared? This again has to do with the nature of energy. If an object is moving twice as fast as another object, it does not have twice as much energy. Rather, it has four times as much energy. Hence, the speed of light is squared, which comes out to a very big number. C^2 is the conversion factor from mass to energy. The bottom line is that even small objects have an immense amount of energy. Through the process of nuclear fusion/fission via nuclear power plants, we can harness some of this energy. In the atomic bomb that destroyed the city of Hiroshima, there was about 700 milligrams (equivalent to the weight of 1/3 of a dime) of uranium which was converted to energy that destroyed everything within a 1-mile (1.6 km) blast radius.

Historic Vids

2,424,303 views • 3 years ago