Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

What makes Rwanda different is the work behind the scenes: the preparation. "Rwanda is the country that has spent the last five years sending students to be trained, and today we have a critical mass of nuclear scientists." This is the blueprint. We need a critical mass of African...

13,797 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇮🇷☢️| Imam Khamenei on Nuclear Weapons & 60% HEU “Today, we are at a high level in uranium enrichment. Of course, countries that want to build nuclear weapons raise enrichment to 90% purity. Since we have no need for weapons and have decided against nuclear arms, we have not gone that far. We raised enrichment to 60%, which is very high, a very good figure, and necessary for some of our domestic needs. We have managed to advance this far. Out of more than 200 countries in the world, only 10 have this capability, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is one of them. The other 9 countries all possess nuclear bombs. We are the only one without a nuclear weapon — and we will not have one, since we do not intend to use nuclear weapons. But we do have enrichment and will keep using it. Among these 10 countries, we are considered one of the leaders in this industry. And, as I said, the scientists who laid the foundation for this work not only advanced it greatly but, more importantly, trained many people in this field. Today, in our country there are dozens of distinguished scientists and professors — this is a verified and reliable report given to us by those directly involved — as well as hundreds of researchers and thousands trained in nuclear-related fields who are active right now. Now, they (the enemy) have bombed such and such facilities. That’s an issue. But knowledge cannot be destroyed. Knowledge cannot be wiped out with bombs, threats, or such things. It remains forever.

Arya - آریا

12,340 views • 10 months ago

President Kagame had warned that Kinshasa might delay the implementation of the Washington peace deal precisely because Tshisekedi and his backers did not get everything they wanted. While Kinshasa tried to portray the conflict as purely economic, which was a misleading interpretation of the crisis, President Kagame thanked the Trump administration for consistently working to address the three key issues: security, political, and economic. Today, Kinshasa and some of its Western allies continue to insist that Rwanda lift its defensive measures before its security concerns are addressed, a suggestion that Rwandan UN Ambassador MartinNgoga firmly rejected: “We listened to preachers once and were slaughtered like cows. It will never happen again.” Once again, Kinshasa is using economic leverage to try to persuade Washington to disavow its own peace deal and turn against Rwanda and the AFC/M23. Congolese officials are doing this for domestic political consumption, but the effort will be in vain. Rwanda’s security concerns must be addressed. The AFC/M23 is growing stronger by the day. And if the war continues, Kinshasa will find itself increasingly isolated and nothing will stop the AFC/M23 from marching on the capital, just as they have warned. Cc: President Donald J. Trump Donald J. Trump U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs Sophie Mokoena Rutendo Matinyarare African Albert Rudatsimburwa 🇷🇼 Robert Cyubahiro McKenna Lawrence Rugwiro Florentine Kabasinga 🇷🇼✊🏾 Dr. Dash Tito Hare Michaela Agasaro Steve Wembi BOLA Frédéric Bertrand Bisimwa Bojana Coulibaly, Ph.D. Ellen Kampire Tristan Ngamije Rugamban'engwe Rwangeyo Rukaka Florentine Kabasinga 🇷🇼✊🏾 Nadia Kabalira Andrew M. Mwenda F. Golooba-Mutebi @Mumbogo_V_S Charles Onyango-Obbo Larry Madowo Mario Nawfal Kayinamura Joseph Sugira Mireille🇨🇩

Isabelle Karake

73,282 views • 9 months ago

I rise to oppose the Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India (SHANTI) Bill 2025. 👉 The government has brought the present bill to open up the civilian nuclear sector to private participation. There's speculation that the government wants to bring in 49% to 100% foreign direct investment into the sector. What strikes me as very strange is that the Adani group of companies announced its intent to participate in the civilian nuclear sector in November, and within a month, we have this bill in the House. 👉 I did not find a single clause or a single word which says anything about supplier liability. The supplier liability has been completely removed. God forbid if a nuclear accident or a nuclear incident were to take place. And since we are going to be dependent upon foreign suppliers, shouldn't the supplier be liable? 👉 There are concerns if the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board is really autonomous. Or is it an extension of the Department of Atomic Energy? If we are opening up India's nuclear energy sector to private participation, what you require is an autonomous, independent regulator who can be a neutral umpire. 👉 In matters of disposal of radioactive waste, the spent fuel—uranium and plutonium—remains toxic for thousands and thousands of years. Most countries store this in the facility itself. The Bill does not provide a robust framework as to how radioactive waste needs to be dealt with. It cannot be a function of delegated legislation, left to rules and regulations. : Listen to Manish Tewari ji as he elaborates on the shortcomings of the SHANTI Bill and urges that it be sent to a JPC for serious scrutiny, as nuclear energy is a serious matter.

Congress

12,285 views • 7 months ago