Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

What's more nerve-racking than making your #TeamIndia Debut ๐Ÿค” Addressing the post-match press conference ๐Ÿ˜ Presenting PC tales ft. Vaishnavi Sharma ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ #INDvSL | IDFC FIRST Bank

289,843 views โ€ข 8 months ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

๐Ÿ’ฅSimple guide on Node Delegator Program & 50 WL ๐Ÿ’ฐFunding - $9M ๐Ÿ’ต$35 - $175 ๐Ÿค”What is Node Delegator Program? โœ…U can buy node licenses & delegate it to supported Node Infra project ๐Ÿค”How is it different โš ๏ธOther licenses u need to buy & run Node in VPS or your PC โœ…In Mira, u just buy & delegate the license to earn rewards โŒNo node setup โŒNo vps cost โŒNo maintenance, updates etc โœ…Just buy & delegate ๐Ÿค”What's the price โœ…U can contribute anywhere between $35 - $175 ๐Ÿ‘‡Steps to join 1๏ธโƒฃWallet Whitelist ๐Ÿ”— โœ…U need WL code to join ๐ŸŽŸ๏ธExclusive code for first 50 Members - CTELU โœ…Paste ur address & WL โš ๏ธThis code works only for first 50 โš ๏ธThis is not Referal code, I don't get any Referal earnings โœ…U can join project Discord for more codes 2๏ธโƒฃBuying the license โœ…This week project might drop a link for licenses purchase โœ…Only whitelisted address can join this โš ๏ธExact date & time not announced, so be active to grab those licenses 3๏ธโƒฃOther details โœ…One license per wallet โœ…Only limited slots available โœ…I am expecting around 3000-5000 slots in first phase โœ…There might be few more phases, so if u missed this one u might get chance in next one ๐Ÿ˜More details r covered in my yesterday's YouTube video, links in bio ๐Ÿ“ธPost your screenshot if u were one of those first 50 Members to grab the WL ๐Ÿ’™Like ๐Ÿ”RT

CryptoTelugu

95,853 views โ€ข 1 year ago

On this day, 90 years ago, Charlie Chaplin's "Modern Times" (1936) premiered at the Rivoli Theatre, New York City, USA. Charles Chaplin on how the Critics and the International audience reacted to 'Modern Times' (1936): "Before the opening of 'Modern Times' (1936), a few columnists wrote that they had heard rumours the picture was communistic. I suppose this was because of a summary of the story that had already appeared in the Press. However, the liberal reviewers wrote that it was neither for nor against communism and that metaphorically I had sat on the fence. Nothing is more nerve-racking than to receive bulletins informing one that the first weekโ€™s attendance broke all records and that the second week fell off slightly. Therefore, after the premiรจres in New York and Los Angeles, my one desire was to get as far away as possible from any news of the picture; so I decided to go to Honolulu, taking Paulette and her mother with me, leaving instructions with the office not to send messages of any kind. We embarked at Los Angeles, arriving in San Francisco in pouring rain. However, nothing dampened our spirits; we had time for a little shopping, then returned to the boat. Passing by warehouses, I saw stamped on some of the freight the word โ€˜Chinaโ€™. โ€˜Letโ€™s go there!โ€™ โ€˜Where?โ€™ said Paulette. โ€˜China.โ€™ โ€˜Are you kidding?โ€™ โ€˜Letโ€™s do it now or we never will,โ€™ I said. โ€˜But I havenโ€™t any clothes.โ€™ โ€˜You can buy all you want in Honolulu,โ€™ I said. All boats should be called Panacea, for nothing is more recuperative than a sea-voyage. Your worries are adjourned, the boat adopts you, and cures you and, when finally she enters port, reluctantly gives you back again to the humdrum world. But when we arrived in Honolulu, to my horror I saw large posters advertising 'Modern Times', and the Press waiting on the dock ready to devour me. There was no escape." ('My Autobiography', Charles Chaplin, 1964)

DepressedBergman

15,872 views โ€ข 7 months ago

Annie Duke (Annie Duke) is a decision-making expert, former professional poker player, special partner at First Round, and the author of Thinking in Bets (a national bestseller) and Quit: The Power of Knowing When to Walk Away. She also co-founded Alliance for Decision Education, a nonprofit whose mission is to improve lives by empowering students through decision skills education. In our conversation, Annie shares: ๐Ÿ”ธ Her biggest lessons from the late Daniel Kahneman ๐Ÿ”ธ How to use pre-mortems and โ€œkill criteriaโ€ ๐Ÿ”ธ The power of โ€œmental time travelโ€ ๐Ÿ”ธ The relationship between money and happiness ๐Ÿ”ธ The nominal group technique for better decisions ๐Ÿ”ธ How First Round improved their decision-making process using her techniques ๐Ÿ”ธ A ton of tactical decision-making frameworks ๐Ÿ”ธ Much more Listen now ๐Ÿ‘‡ - YouTube: - Spotify: - Apple: Some key takeaways: 1. Use the โ€œ3Dsโ€ framework to make better decisions for your org: a. Discover: Collect individual opinions independently before group discussion and then share these with everybody prior to the meeting. b. Discuss: Compare perspectives within the group, focusing on understanding points of disagreement rather than building consensus. c. Decide: Make decisions independently post-discussion to minimize group influence. 2. Incorporate the word โ€œneverthelessโ€ into discussions, especially when making decisions or addressing disagreements. It acknowledges the other personโ€™s perspective while affirming your decision or stance. 3. Replace confrontational language like โ€œI disagreeโ€ or โ€œyouโ€™re wrongโ€ with phrases like โ€œI donโ€™t understandโ€ so everyone feels heard and valued. If people feel heard, they are more likely to feel like they contributed to the decision, even when they disagree. 4. Use pre-mortems to set kill criteria. Before starting a project, imagine failure and what early warning signs might have predicted it. Commit in advance to reassess or pivot if you notice those red flags later on. This makes it easier to walk away when sunk costs and overconfidence bias loom large. 5. Know that if youโ€™re considering quitting, itโ€™s likely overdue. Uncertainty, sunk costs, identity, and ownership effects conspire to make us persist with failing efforts longer than we should. We wait for incontrovertible proof to quit. If quitting crosses your mind, examine if youโ€™d start the project today given what you now know.

Lenny Rachitsky

74,746 views โ€ข 2 years ago

Grateful. Thatโ€™s the first word that came to mind as I left Dick Vitaleโ€™s home in Florida after presenting him with the Society of Professional Journalistsโ€™ โ€œFellow of the Societyโ€ honor, the highest recognition our organization bestows. Dickie V is unable to attend our national conference in October, so we spent today recording an acceptance video and taking photos to commemorate the occasion. He also loved the seven-page feature Q&A I did with him for SPJโ€™s Quill magazine. Grateful to have grown up in an era when Dick Vitale was redefining basketball broadcasting. His unmatched energy, larger-than-life personality and unmistakable charisma informed, engaged and entertained millions of fans while helping shape the modern sports television landscape. Grateful to Dick and his wonderful wife, Lorraine, for welcoming me into their beautiful home. I found myself just as captivated by the lifetime of memories displayed on their walls, photos, awards and keepsakes, as I was by the conversation we shared. He also asked her to record the video on this post and posted it before I did! Grateful to serve as National President of the Society of Professional Journalists and to advocate every day for press freedom, ethical journalism, impactful storytelling and the values this historic organization has championed for more than a century. As my presidency comes to a close on October 1, Iโ€™m cherishing every meeting, lecture, event, phone call and email that allows me to serve our incredible members and this important mission. Thereโ€™s much more Iโ€™d love to share about my visit with Dickie V, but Iโ€™ll save those for my next SPJ Quill blog. Awesome, baby! โค๏ธ๐Ÿ€ ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿป

Chris R. Vaccaro

31,930 views โ€ข 1 month ago

VIDEO | Twisha Sharma Death Case: During a press conference, Twisha Sharmaโ€™s brother Major Harshit Sharma says, โ€œWe are here to question the process. The first call made to the police was made by us, not by them. They claimed that they were in a hurry trying to save her. However, the video that has resurfaced clearly shows Girbala Singh moving around very calmly, walking up and down the stairs as if she had all the time in the world. Being fully aware of the judicial system, she had complete access and the ability to call the police station, which was only 30 seconds away from her home. Why did she not make that call? It took us more than three days to get the FIR registered. Our FIR was finally lodged on the 15th at 2:30 in the morning. Even before that, their anticipatory bail application had already been filed. It all appears to be a well-orchestrated effort from their side. The fact that she was granted bail on the grounds that she is a 63-year-old woman of repute and considered a non-threat does not justify her actions, which clearly reflect the opposite of how she is being portrayed. A so-called โ€˜non-threatโ€™ is sending people to threaten my 61-year-old father inside the court premises. A โ€˜non-threatโ€™ is sending people to threaten my family, saying that 30 men would beat us up. How is a 63-year-old threatening a 61-year-old justified? Who gave her the authority to make such remarks about my deceased sister? Why are we not asking where Samarth Singh is? Why is he absconding? Why are these questions not being asked? Why are they not asking for a second post-mortem?โ€ (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

312,084 views โ€ข 3 months ago

This has been the favorite story on the left in the past 24 hours. CNBC's Ross Sorkin (Andrew Ross Sorkin) has been going from network to network, telling viewers that many of the 80 CEOs who met with Trump were shocked by his meandering, with some questioning his mental fitness. Others said he could not even explain why he wants to lower their taxes from 21 percent to 20 percent and that he was jumping from one topic to another without any direction. Most importantly, those who came into the room as Trump supporters left the room being less supportive of him. Some of my followers say, "Simon, do not show us what is being said on the other side, including to millions of independent voters; we already know they are just about propaganda." But that means you're following the wrong account! First, you cannot dictate what I post. I post what I find important. I cannot dictate what you post, as you post what you find important. Second, I would rather hear what all sides are saying about Trump's DC visit on June 13 rather than just one side. So, let's recap: Trump arrives in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, June 13, 2024. He meets with GOP lawmakers and 80 CEOs at a Business Roundtable. He addresses the media after the meeting. We bring you all of that, including his remarks praising what has happened and the unity in the party. Other GOP leaders hold a press conference, stating that everything was so good and Trump is the next president. Pictures are released, and we shared all of those with you. But we move to the other side; what are they saying? Nancy Pelosi, Hakeem Jeffries, and the other usual suspects attack Trump and Republicans and condemn the visit. The MSM condemns the visit. Others begin to say how Trump was so bad privately when he met with the CEOs and why he should not be elected again. Now, my followers go on the attack, attacking me, forgetting that it's just a developing story. Truth is often in-between. It's not left-wing or right-wing; it's in-between. You become more informed when you hear all sides and are smart enough to make up your mind. By following me, you become more balanced and more informed, rather than just living in a bubble!

Simon Ateba

443,136 views โ€ข 2 years ago

The More You Look For The Lahaina, Maui, Hawaii Fires โ€˜Coincidencesโ€™, The More You Find LEGISLATION WAS PASSED PRIOR TO FIRES ALLOWING THE POLICE CHIEF (aka Coroner) TO CREMATE BODIES IN A NEW WAY ๐Ÿšจ Please take the time to read or watch this post โ€œI met the Maui Police Department's forensic facility in Wailuku where morgue operations specialists are actually loading mats in containers with bodies right now. So why is our police chief also our coroner? He admitted that on a press conference just the other day. Legislation was passed that allowed the sheriff, AKA the coroner, I'll go ahead and include the link so you can go ahead and look at those legislation bills. โ€Œ But in doing so, not only are there no descendants there to look for lost loved ones, such as where are the parents to the missing children? They're not there. Not only has this whole operation completely just annihilated the indigenous people of Lahaina, but in doing what they've done, they've also completely disintegrated all traces of DNA. โ€Œ So yeah, if the math ain't math, then let me help you out here. Not only is the coroner's office, aka the sheriff, making $800 for each and every person, he stuffs in one of those containers that very well is one of these alkaline, hydrolysis, decomposing chambers. He's not only making $800 per person, but by eliminating all DNA, any surviving ancestors to those that perished in this... fire. โ€Œ Any surviving ancestors that live abroad say in the mainland they can never return home and state claim to their land because it's surrendered over to the coroner's office. It's given to, it's given back to the state. So because there's no trace of evidence of the DNA. This is disgusting you guys. This is disgusting and I hope this helps somebody. โ€Œ We're at the end and if you don't know Christ Jesus, now is the time to turn and repent to him. And I'm talking to you elites more than anything. You might want to stop what you're doing because Christ Jesus is coming back and it ain't gonna end well for you. If you think what you've done to these people is just, oh, you just wait until you find yourself sitting in a lake of fire. Because that's what's coming for you if you all don't turn from your bulldog and repent of your evil in wicked ways.โ€ DEWs, Direct Energy Weapons #Hawaii #Maui #MauiFires #Lahaina #LahainaFires #DEWs #DirectedEnergyWeapons

Wall Street Apes

766,982 views โ€ข 3 years ago

You can be a great team with resources that rank in the middle of your conference. You can take a job and have success at a school in which the administration has higher expectations than they give you resources. The reality is, it is difficult to get any head coaching position, especially for those looking for their first. First time head coaches usually arenโ€™t getting max resourced jobs in high school, college, or in the pros. The resource excuse is often a crutch for coaches: โ€œWe didnโ€™t beat them because they have more.โ€ โ€œHow are we suppose to win with our facilities?โ€ โ€œWe travel in vans. They travel charter; they are more well-rested and prepared.โ€ When deciding whether to apply for, go through the hiring process, and ultimately, making the decision to accept a new position, coaches should ask themselves three questions: 1. โ€œIs my new administration open-minded to finding creative solutions to bridging the resource gaps so we can provide the best experience for our student-athletes?โ€ -Creating revenue: My current athletic director David Spafford has taught me a lot about revenue creation in athletics. There are a lot of ways to bridge the budget gap including fundraising, corporate sponsorships, ticket sales, facility rentals, camps, and much more. The possibilities are endless. If you are looking at a position where the allocated resources arenโ€™t where they need to be to compete then ask yourself if youโ€™re the right person to help create revenue. Youโ€™ll see a job where the previous 10 years yielded multiple coaches and no success. Then one coach comes in and turns everything around without a change to the allocated resources. Chances are, the new coach is a better fit for the job than prior coaches. They usually arrive with a bag full of creative solutions and positive energy to move the program forward. If you donโ€™t have budget money for post-workout nutrition for your student-athletes then go raise money. If you need a new weight room then go talk to corporate sponsors around the community about giving X amount of dollars annually for the next 10 years. Get an architectural rendering. Go out and show the community what is needed, why it benefits them and others. Remember, actual coaching is a small percentage of the job. Building a program is so much more. 2. โ€œWhat do I need as a coach for success, what are my non-negotiables, and does this position provide them so I can help the school, program, and student-athletes achieve success?โ€ -Every coach needs talented players, but itโ€™s more than that. Style of play is really important for each coach. Does the job youโ€™re considering allow you to work with and develop the type of athlete you need to be successful. Some coaches are flexible in working with different leadership styles, many are not. Can you handle an athletic director who micro-manages or who can and will blow up on you? Do you prefer a more hands-off AD? What kind of boss do you need and does the job provide it? Make a list of 3-5 non-negotiables. Does the job have them? If they donโ€™t then you already know your answer. The job has to line up with your core values. 3. โ€œCan we compete towards the top third of the conference if I am the head coach at this job?โ€ -The quality of every job is ultimately on a sliding scale based on how good the conference is. Maybe the job you are considering is poorly-resourced but itโ€™s also in a weak conference. This is the type of job you should consider taking. The jobs you need to avoid are the worst jobs within the best leagues. You can take and find success in a low-resourced positions if the league is just ok. However, there is minimal pathway to success if youโ€™re in the best league and at an under-resourced school. If you do catch lighting in a bottle, there wonโ€™t be sustainability with this set up.

Craig Doty

276,614 views โ€ข 2 years ago

๐Ÿšจ EXCLUSIVE โ€” Tucker Carlson promoted a "Jews control the U.S." conspiracy theory the DAY AFTER it was widely debunked. Worse, Tucker used the trope to malign the Detroit-area Sheriff who was the public face of the terrorist attack against a Jewish preschool last month. On March 23, Shadow of Ezra โ€” which peddles dark (and typically false) tales about Jews & Israel โ€” first floated the bogus theory, alongside a clip from a press conference three days prior by Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard. The post took something true โ€” that someone had posted an anti-Semitic meme featuring Sheriff Bouchard โ€” and wrapped it inside a lie: claiming that the sheriff had ordered the meme's author arrested "to teach the public a lesson." During the press conference, Sheriff Bouchard noted that the meme's author had been arrested in Wisconsin, but without any suggestion that it was related to the meme. Less than 24 hours after the Shadow of Ezra post, early morning on March 24, Oakland County Sheriffโ€™s Office issued a statement in its own viral post confirming that the meme's author was arrested for an unrelated, outstanding felony warrant. Various major news outlets picked up the story. By that evening, it would have taken less than 30 seconds on Google to see that the conspiracy theory had been debunked. Enter Tucker Carlson. Long after the truth was clear, on the evening of March 25, Tucker spent several minutes of his monologue ranting as if the debunked trope were actually real. Tucker bellowed, "Sheriff Bouchard from Michigan has decided that heโ€™s going to arrest and imprison people who make memes mocking him." He then got firmly on his high horse, declaring that Bouchard "should be the subject of a federal investigation, like in about one minute after that hits the Internet." But Tucker didn't just want the full weight of the FBI on Bouchard; he wanted riots. "How is this not leading to mass protests? Why did they not shut your sheriffโ€™s department down," he asked incredulously. Of course, the reason is that the entire premise for his performative outrage was a loopy conspiracy theory that could have been easily debunked in 30 seconds or less. Just in case someone might want to give Tucker the benefit of the doubt, he doubled down on the flimsy falsehood two days later, reposting specifically this segment in a standalone video on March 27 โ€” three days after it had been widely reported as bogus. But this is par for Tucker's course these days. As long as a supposed "fact" makes Israel or Jews look deceitful, sinister or secretly pulling the strings to screw over "ordinary" Americans, Tucker will enthusiastically run with it โ€” no matter how outlandish or how easily the "fact" can be debunked. And this example gives lie to the myth โ€” peddled most often by Megyn Kelly โ€” that Tucker is merely criticizing "Israel." There was not even a possible tangential connection between the Sheriff Bouchard conspiracy and Israel. It was done strictly to spread the poisonous narrative that Jews are secretly controlling America and desescrating key pillars of our society, including the Constitution. For Tucker, that was all he needed to gleefully push the falsehood like the carnival barker he has become.

Joel Mowbray

51,268 views โ€ข 5 months ago

๐Ÿšจ๐ŸŽฅ Full post-match interview with Bruno Fernandes and Harry Maguire after the 5-2 victory over Ipswich Town! ๐Ÿ”ด๐Ÿ”ฅ โ€ข Reaction after the disappointing opening game! โ€ข Regaining control and showing courage in the second half! โ€ข Brunoโ€™s third hat-trick at Old Trafford! ๐ŸŽฉ ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Interviewer: โ€œCongratulations on the win. It looks like a very big victory and your first of the season. How are you feeling?โ€ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Bruno Fernandes: โ€œIt was definitely a very important and big win for us. We knew we had dropped three points last week, so the aim was to get the three points and put in a great performance for our fans at home in our first game here for a long time. We canโ€™t make up for last week because you canโ€™t get six points from one game, but we wanted to start the game on the front foot and with intensity. We controlled the game even when we conceded, and in the second half we were really excellent.โ€ ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Interviewer: โ€œThe game felt like a real statement of the teamโ€™s strength. Harry, what did the team do particularly well?โ€ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Harry Maguire: โ€œI think we started the game really well, but their goal unsettled us a lot. Last weekโ€™s defeat was difficult, and when you lose at this club, thereโ€™s a lot of noise and it feels like youโ€™re in a crisis again after just one game! After conceding, we lost control for five to ten minutes, but we spoke at half-time, came out and took control again. We know weโ€™re capable of scoring at any moment, and we showed that today. We could have scored even more goals.โ€ ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Interviewer: โ€œBruno, how important was your equaliser right before half-time in maintaining that belief?โ€ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Bruno Fernandes: โ€œScoring before half-time is always important, whether itโ€™s to take the lead or to equalise, because it gives you the belief that what you were doing wasnโ€™t completely wrong. As Harry said, we were controlling the game and lost control for five to ten minutes after the goal, but we got back on track. In the second half, after making a few adjustments, we were really excellent.โ€ ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Interviewer: โ€œHarry, you were involved in the second goal, and there was some debate over whether it was your goal or a handball. What do you think happened?โ€ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Harry Maguire: โ€œTo be honest, I havenโ€™t watched the replay, so I canโ€™t comment accurately. I know it was a close call, and it certainly wasnโ€™t an intentional handball. I donโ€™t know if the ball actually hit my fingers. My shot was slightly off target, so I think it will unfortunately be given as an own goal! Maybe thatโ€™s why it was awarded, because if it had been my goal, they would have ruled it out under the current rules. Luckily, luck was on our side today, and we deserved the win and deserved that bit of fortune.โ€ ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Interviewer: โ€œBruno, this is your third hat-trick in a Manchester United shirt. How amazing does it feel?โ€ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Bruno Fernandes: โ€œScoring goals is definitely the best feeling in football, and scoring a hat-trick at Old Trafford in front of our fans is incredible. Iโ€™m very proud of it. But the most important thing is always to score to help the team win. I did that today, and hopefully I can score more and help my teammates score as well.โ€ ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Interviewer: โ€œHow important is a result like this as a response to what happened on the opening day?โ€ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Harry Maguire: โ€œItโ€™s a very important win. Last week was frustrating; we had prepared throughout pre-season to win against Hull City, but unfortunately we conceded two goals from set pieces and lost. We knew how important todayโ€™s game was in front of our fans after being away from Old Trafford for such a long time, and luckily we got the three points. In the end, itโ€™s three points and we move forward. The season is long, and weโ€™ll focus on the next game.โ€ ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Interviewer: โ€œHarry, would you like to present the award? Bruno is the Player of the Match.โ€ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Harry Maguire (jokingly handing over the award): โ€œAnother award!โ€ ๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ˜… ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Bruno Fernandes: โ€œThank you very much, mate.โ€ ๐Ÿคโค๏ธ

The Final Whistle

17,089 views โ€ข 4 days ago

A TRUST FUND FOR EVERYONE: How to create a Monetary Commons that socialises money and funds a basic dividend without new taxes or debt [At a time Donald Trump, Big Tech and Wall Street deploy stablecoins to privatise the dollar, usurping the decentralising power of blockchain to enrich themselves at everyone elseโ€™s expense, here is an alternative use of blockchain that harnesses its decentralising powers to benefit everyone equally โ€“ to pay everyone a substantial, non-inflationary, basic dividend โ€“ without the need to tax or borrow. Read on and/or watch the video] Here is an idea that can make a real, urgently needed, difference to our awfully divided, exploitative societies. Imagine a trust fund for everyone paying a personal dividend to each. Now imagine a common, a public digital platform, letโ€™s call it a Monetary Commons, that harnesses our collective capacity to create the money needed to fund this personal dividend for all. The idea of a personal or basic income is not new, of course. People have sung its praises for decades. But they were stifled. The majority doesnโ€™t want to pay higher taxes, or the higher interest rates more public debt would bring, to deliver a personal payment to others, including to the already stinking rich. But what if it is now possible to pay a decent personal dividend without new taxes or new public debt. How? Not by magic or hocus pocus economics but by reclaiming from private bankers our societyโ€™s power to create money. Today, we have the digital tools to take back the power to create money, use that power to create a common trust fund, and pay each a personal dividend. These tools are here already. And if we do not use them for benefitting everyone, the bankers and Big Tech will use them to print more money for themselves. So, letโ€™s get cracking! Letโ€™s build a new Monetary Commons to pay a personal dividend to each! How would it work? Technically, it is ever so simple. You download an app, letโ€™s call it Monetary Commons Pay (or MCPay). MCPay is provided by your central bank (the Fed in the US, the ECB in Europe, the Bank of England in Britain etc.). Essentially, the central bank has opened a digital account for you which you can use to receive and pay money, the way you use your normal bank account app. How is this MCPay app helpful? In three fabulous ways, which I shall present in ascending order of importance. First, because with MCPay you can send and receive money for free, avoiding the terrible, inexcusable, fees charged by private banks โ€“ even the โ€˜fuel feesโ€™ of crypto. The second, even greater, benefit is that the money you keep in your MCPay grows at the central bank interest rate โ€“ which is always higher than the measly rate private banks pay for your savings. Free transactions and higher interest on your savings would be good enough reasons to have the MCPay app. But, the truly mesmerising, hugely exciting benefit is the third one: The new app makes it possible for the Central Bank to pay you, and everyone else, a substantial personal dividend. Pay attention to see where this money will come from, why it is not inflationary, why it requires no new taxes, no new debt and no magic: You have heard of how private banks create loans from thin air, right? How they can turn, on average, $3 of new deposits into a new $100 loan? [Yes, lest we forget, only 3% of the money in our advanced economies come from the central bank โ€“ the rest is conjured up by private banks.] But this works in reverse as well! If bankers turn $3 into $100, were you to transfer $3 from your normal bank to your MCPay, to take advantage of free transactions and the higher interest rate, you will have annulled your bankerโ€™s opportunity to create $100. In other words, as you transfer $3 from your bank to your new MCPay account, the total quantity of money in the economy would fall by, $100 minus $3, $97. Would this not be bad for the economy? It sure would be if nothing was done about it. But wait. Suppose the central bank were to create $97 for every $3 transferred to someoneโ€™s MCPay and credit that extra $97, equally, to everyoneโ€™s MCPay account. Bingo! Do you see now how a personal dividend was made possible without new taxes, new debt or potentially inflationary increases in the quantity of money? Now, please do not think that this a theoretical discussion. Yes, our governments, in the pockets of financiers as they are, are not interested in giving you the option of an MCPay app. But, with Donald Trump at the helm and his GENIUS Act on the statutes, they are busily handing over this incredible power to create money not to society, not to a Monetary Commons, but to Big Tech and Wall Street. How? By shunning the MCPay app that would benefit you, everyone, equally, and pushing instead for so-called stablecoins issued by privateers, mainly Big Tech and Wall Street, for their benefit. But how much money could we expect to receive as a personal dividend if we were to create a monetary commons? The answer is: a lot! The US Treasury recently predicted that around worth $6.6 trillion of US bank deposits will be transferred to stablecoins - the private version of MCPay from which you will benefit not at all. Yes, $6.6 trillion, that is more than six thousand billion dollars. If such a sum were to be transferred to the monetary commons, to our MCPay accounts, keeping the quantity of money in the US constant would require that the Fed credits $213 trillion to everyoneโ€™s MCPay accounts. Thatโ€™s considerably more than $600 thousand for each woman, man and child resident in the US! And similarly in Britain, Europe, Japan etc. A sizeable trust fund for everyone. This is a remarkable opportunity for making a difference to our awfully divided societies. We must seize it. For the benefit of the many, not the few. Of course, the few โ€“ beginning with the bankers โ€“ will scream blue murder. They will do their utmost to stop this from happening. They will fearmonger like crazy, eager as they are to usurp the lionโ€™s share of the money that society generates collectively. They will try to terrorise you with tales of calamities that will befall you if this Monetary Commons were to be created. They will prognosticate cataclysmic inflation โ€“ even though the whole point of the personal dividend is to keep the money supply constant. They will terrorise you with the prospect of new taxation and new public debt โ€“ even though they understand that there is no need for new taxes or new public debt to pay you a substantial personal dividend. To appeal to your social conscience, they will tell you that a Monetary Commons is Elon Muskโ€™s and the libertariansโ€™ way to dismantle social security โ€“ even though there is no reason to cut social security in any way to fund everyoneโ€™s personal dividend. They will bombard you with the spectre of Big Brother, likening the Monetary Commons to a Chinese Communist Party ploy to have the central bank follow your every transaction โ€“ even though they know that MCPay can easily be built on distributed ledger technology that guarantees privacy to each while preventing the authorities from manipulating the money supply without the public noticing. As they scream and shout and terrorise you, you will know: Bankers just hate the idea of going back to the role of intermediaries, of borrowing from Jack to lend to Jill. They are only interested in maintaining their monopoly over the money system โ€“ and to extend it now that digital money enhances societyโ€™s capacity to create even more new money, a capacity that they want to privatise when we should want to share equally. So, let us ignore the shrieks of the moneymen and let us use new tech to share better the benefits from our collective capacity to create money. Letโ€™s make building a Monetary Commons our common goal. It wonโ€™t cure all of our deeply exploitative societyโ€™s ills. But it will go a long way to cure many and, perhaps more importantly, it will give the many a sense of their power. FOR MORE ON THE MONETARY COMMONS, VISIT Raphael Arar Hirad Sab DiEM25

Yanis Varoufakis

29,468 views โ€ข 10 months ago

Made $530,000 with Ai Bot that started with $313. Didn't know how to code. Now this bots run 24/7 printing money while sleeping. I've made the exact step-by-step guide to build this Claude Code Polymarket trading bot. Prompts. Code. Risk settings. Paper trading checklist. Everything from zero to running bot. It's free. For 24 hours. After that I'm charging $499 for it. To grab it right now: 1. Comment "Claude Bot" 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar ( I can't send DMs to non-followers ) I'm DMing everyone who Complete the 3 steps. I spent hundreds of thousands hiring developers because he was too scared to learn. Then learned Claude Code. Built algorithmic trading systems. $313 โ†’ $530,000. You have the same tools available right now. And you're using them to ask ChatGPT for Instagram captions. This attached video is a goldmine. Full live walkthrough. Claude Code building actual Polymarket trading bots. From zero. Every line of code. Every decision explained. Now let me break down why everything you're doing in trading is wrong and exactly how to fix it. Save this post. You'll hate yourself if you lose it. โ†“ Let's start with why you keep losing money. You already know the answer. You just won't admit it. You overtrade. Every. Single. Day. You see a candle move. You feel something. You enter. No plan. No edge. No reason. Just feelings. Then it goes against you. You feel something else. Panic. Anger. Denial. You move your stop loss. Or you didn't set one at all. "It'll come back." It doesn't come back. So you take another trade. A revenge trade. Bigger size this time. Because you need to "make it back." That one fails too. Now you're emotional. Now you're tilted. Now you're using leverage you have no business touching. 40x. 50x. 100x. On a trade you entered because a candle looked "bullish" and some guy on Twitter said "send it." You get liquidated. Close the laptop. Punch something. Tell yourself you'll be "more disciplined" tomorrow. Tomorrow comes. Same cycle. Same result. Same liquidation. You've been doing this for months. Maybe years. And you still think the problem is your strategy. The problem isn't your strategy. The problem is you. Save this post right now. What I'm about to show you is the only way to remove yourself from the equation. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss any of this. โ†“ Here's what's actually killing your account. It's not the market. The market doesn't care about you. It's not your indicators. RSI works fine. MACD works fine. They all "work." It's not your timeframe. It's not your broker. It's not the "manipulation." It's four things: 1. Emotions. You hold losers because hope feels better than loss. You cut winners because fear feels stronger than greed. You size up when angry. You skip trades when scared. Your emotional state determines your position size. That's insane. And you know it's insane. But you keep doing it. 2. Overtrading. You take 15 trades a day. Maybe 5 of them had actual setups. The other 10 were boredom. Boredom trades are the most expensive hobby in human history. 3. Leverage. You use 20x-50x on trades where you're not even sure about the direction. That's not trading. That's a casino with a nicer interface. 4. Fees. You're smashing market orders. Paying spread. Paying commission. On 15 trades a day. Your broker makes more money from your account than you do. Think about that. Your broker is profitable on your account. You're not. You're the product. Not the trader. These four things are why 90% of traders lose. Not bad luck. Not the market. You. Save this post and follow Himanshu Kumar because the solution is coming next. โ†“ The solution is painfully obvious. Remove yourself from the equation. Not partially. Not "I'll be more disciplined." Not "I'll journal my trades." Not "I'll meditate before trading." Completely remove yourself. Build a bot. Let the bot trade. You go live your life. The bot doesn't feel emotions. The bot doesn't overtrade. The bot doesn't use reckless leverage. The bot doesn't smash market orders and bleed fees. The bot follows the rules. Every single time. Without exception. Without "just this once." Without "I have a feeling about this one." Rules in. Execution out. No human in the middle to mess everything up. That's algorithmic trading. And before your ego jumps in with "but I'm different, I have discipline" โ€” No you don't. Your account balance proves you don't. If you had discipline, your account would be green. It's not. So you don't. Accept it. Automate it. Move on. This is the hardest truth in trading. Your discipline will always fail. A bot's won't. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the exact bot setup that removes your emotions permanently. โ†“ "But I don't know how to code." Neither did he. The guy in this video didn't know how to code for most of his life. Got held back in 7th grade. People counted him out early. Spent years building apps and SaaS businesses without writing a single line of code. Hired developers on Upwork instead. Spent hundreds of thousands of dollars paying other people to build what he could have built himself. Because he was scared to learn. That fear cost him years. And hundreds of thousands of dollars. Sound familiar? You're doing the same thing right now. Not with developers. But with your time. You're spending thousands of hours trading manually because you're scared to learn the thing that would make trading automatic. The fear of learning to code is costing you more than any bad trade ever did. Because every month you trade manually is a month of emotional decisions, overleveraged entries, and unnecessary losses that a bot would never make. And here's the thing that should really frustrate you: AI does the hard parts now. You don't need a computer science degree. You don't need to work at a hedge fund. You don't need to be "good at math." Claude Code writes the code for you. You just need to think clearly about trading ideas. That's it. If you can describe a strategy in English, Claude can build it in Python. "I don't know how to code" stopped being a valid excuse in 2024. It's 2026. You're 2 years late on that excuse. Find a new one. Or stop making excuses entirely. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm showing you how people with zero coding experience are building profitable bots. โ†“ The process that actually makes money. Three letters. R. B. I. Research. Backtest. Implement. That's it. That's the entire process. Every single day. Research: Find an idea. A pattern. A market inefficiency. Don't trade it yet. Don't even think about trading it yet. Just research it. Backtest: Test the idea against historical data. Does it work? Not "does it look good on one chart." Does it work across thousands of trades? Across different market conditions? Across in-sample AND out-of-sample data? If no, kill it. Find another idea. If yes, move to step 3. Implement: Build the bot. Deploy it. Paper trade first. Then live with small size. Scale only on evidence. Research. Backtest. Implement. Every day. No exceptions. You know what your current process is? Feel. Enter. Pray. F. E. P. Feel bullish. Enter a trade. Pray it works. That's not a process. That's gambling with a TradingView subscription. RBI is the only process that works. Save this post. Tattoo it on your forearm. Follow Himanshu Kumar for daily RBI breakdowns. โ†“ What Claude Code actually does that your manual process can't. You can maybe test 3-5 strategy ideas per week. Manually adjusting parameters. Manually checking results. Manually writing code (badly). Claude Code tests 50-100 ideas per week. With parallel agents running simultaneously. Multiple strategies being built, tested, and validated at the same time. While you sleep. The guy in this video spends 4-8 hours a day building systems with Claude Code. Not trading. Building. Research. Backtest. Implement. Then iterate. Improve. Optimize. Every day the systems get better. Every day the edge compounds. Every day the bots get smarter. While you? You spend 4-8 hours a day staring at charts making the same mistakes you made last month. Same indicators. Same patterns. Same entries. Same losses. He's iterating forward. You're running in circles. Same 8 hours per day. Completely different outcomes. Because he's building systems. And you're feeding a casino. Stop feeding the casino. Start building the machine. Save this post and follow Himanshu Kumar for the Claude Code workflow that iterates strategies while you sleep. โ†“ Jim Simons. That's the benchmark. You probably don't know who Jim Simons is. And that tells me everything about how seriously you take trading. Jim Simons. Mathematician. Founded Renaissance Technologies. Built a net worth of $31 billion. 100% from algorithmic trading. Not one single manual trade. Not one "gut feeling" entry. Not one RSI divergence. Not one "smart money concept." Algorithms. Bots. Systems. Data. $31 billion. His fund averaged 66% annual returns for over 30 years. While you're excited about making $200 on a trade that you'll give back tomorrow. The best trader in human history never placed a manual trade in his life. And you think your edge is staring at a 5-minute chart with bloodshot eyes at 2 AM? Your edge is building the system. Not being inside it. Jim Simons is the benchmark. Everything else is noise. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm building toward the same goal and showing every step publicly. โ†“ What you need to understand about patience. This is not get-rich-overnight. The guy in this video says it directly: "This channel is not for people looking to get rich overnight. It's not plug and play. There are no shortcuts. If you're impatient, this probably isn't for you." And that's exactly why most people will fail at this. Because you want results now. Today. This trade. You don't want to spend a week building a bot. You don't want to paper trade for 2 weeks. You don't want to test 50 ideas to find 1 that works. You want to copy someone's bot, run it live with your rent money, and be rich by Friday. That's why you'll be broke by Friday. The guy making $2.3M spent months iterating. Testing. Failing. Rebuilding. Testing again. He was patient when you would have quit. He was calm when you would have panicked. He was consistent when you would have given up. Patience isn't just a virtue in trading. It's the only virtue. Without it, everything else fails. Impatience is the most expensive personality trait in trading. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar and learn to build systems with the patience that actually pays. โ†“ The live streams where the real learning happens. The YouTube video is the trailer. The live streams are the movie. Real-time bot building. Real-time questions answered. Real code shown. Real mistakes made and fixed. Not polished highlight reels where everything works perfectly. Actual development. Where things break. Where strategies fail. Where code doesn't compile. Where the fix takes 2 hours. Because that's what real development looks like. And seeing the messy parts is more valuable than any polished tutorial. Because when your bot breaks at 3 AM, you need to know how to fix it. Not just how to celebrate when it works. The streams mix beginner and advanced. Start with how to automate trading. How to use AI for code generation. Then dive into the daily work. Claude Code. Parallel agents. Constant iteration. Live debugging. 4-8 hours of real algorithmic trading development. Live. Uncut. No filter. Most "trading education" shows you the wins. This shows you the work. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the stream schedules and breakdowns. โ†“ The belief that changes everything. Code is the greatest equalizer. Not money. Not connections. Not a degree. Not where you grew up. Not what school you went to. Code. Once you can build systems, you can build anything. For the rest of your life. A trading bot today. A SaaS product tomorrow. An automation business next month. A completely different life next year. The skill isn't "algorithmic trading." The skill is building systems. And that skill transfers to everything. The guy who can build a trading bot can also build a lead gen tool. Can also build a content pipeline. Can also build a SaaS product. Can also build literally anything that runs on logic and code. One skill. Infinite applications. And AI makes learning it 100x easier than it was 5 years ago. You don't need to be smart. You don't need talent. You need Claude Code and the willingness to sit down and build something instead of consuming content about building something. Building is the skill. Everything else is entertainment disguised as education. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm showing you how to build, not just how to watch. โ†“ If any of this applies to you, pay attention. If you've lost money from overtrading. If you've been liquidated. If you know trading is the vehicle but manual execution keeps crashing you. If you've tried "being more disciplined" and it never lasted more than a week. If you keep saying "next month I'll start automating." If you've spent more money on courses than you've made from trading. There is a better way. It's not a magic indicator. It's not a signal group. It's not a $997 mentorship from a guy who makes money teaching, not trading. It's building your own system. A system that trades without emotion. A system that follows rules without exception. A system that runs while you sleep. A system that compounds while you live your life. That's the answer. It's always been the answer. You've just been too scared to accept that the solution requires building something instead of buying something. โ†“ What the next 30 days look like if you actually commit. Week 1: Watch the video. Learn Claude Code basics. Build your first simple strategy. Run your first backtest. Week 2: Iterate. Let Claude improve the strategy. Run Monte Carlo validation. Paper trade. Week 3: Go live with $50-100. Tiny positions. Watch every trade. Compare to paper results. Week 4: Scale based on evidence. Not based on excitement. Not based on one good day. Based on data. 30 days from now you either have a running bot that trades without your emotions destroying every position. Or you're exactly where you are right now. Reading another post. Making another promise. Breaking it by Tuesday. Same 30 days either way. Different actions. Different results. Different life. โ†“ Full video tutorial attached. Live bot building with Claude Code. From zero to running Polymarket trading bot. Every line of code. Every decision explained. The video is free. Claude Code is available now. The market is open 24/7. The only thing standing between you and a profitable trading bot is the same thing that's been standing there for months. You. Get out of your own way. Follow Himanshu Kumar for daily AI trading bot breakdowns, live build sessions, and the full RBI process. Save this post. Watch the video. Build the bot. Or keep trading manually and keep losing. The choice has never been easier. And you've never been more stubborn about making the wrong one.

Himanshu Kumar

38,045 views โ€ข 5 months ago