Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

What's that beautiful blue glow around a nuclear reactor core? Cherenkov radiation, charged particles from fission racing faster than light through water, creating an electromagnetic "sonic boom" of light. Fun fact: It's the same effect that makes spent fuel pools glow blue and was key to discovering neutrinos. Writer: Lucas

Mario Nawfal

3,667,256 subscribers

31,762 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Can particles move faster than light? Nobel Prize employee Olof is here to explain more about how that's possible in Cherenkov radiation – the discovery that received the 1958 physics prize. Learn more about this effect: Reactor Video Credits: Sandia National Laboratories; IAEA Office of Public Information and Communication

Can particles move faster than light? Nobel Prize employee Olof is here to explain more about how that's possible in Cherenkov radiation – the discovery that received the 1958 physics prize. Learn more about this effect: Reactor Video Credits: Sandia National Laboratories; IAEA Office of Public Information and Communication

The Nobel Prize

37,429 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Good luck trying to get more of Australia’s uranium Narendra Modi. Last time India requested Australia’s uranium, Albanese opposed then PM Gillard and spoke against exporting. In 2007, he said on a uranium mining motion “the light on the hill is not the glow of radiation from a nuclear waste dump”. And in the recent nuclear fear campaign he posted that scenic Aussie locations were “under threat” from nuclear power plants. Hopefully our Prime Minister wakes up to the fact Australia is one of the only advanced economies not investing in nuclear soon…

Good luck trying to get more of Australia’s uranium Narendra Modi. Last time India requested Australia’s uranium, Albanese opposed then PM Gillard and spoke against exporting. In 2007, he said on a uranium mining motion “the light on the hill is not the glow of radiation from a nuclear waste dump”. And in the recent nuclear fear campaign he posted that scenic Aussie locations were “under threat” from nuclear power plants. Hopefully our Prime Minister wakes up to the fact Australia is one of the only advanced economies not investing in nuclear soon…

Will Shackel

17,447 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 TOILET PAPER CAUSES CANCER — MAN’S UV LIGHT TEST HAS PEOPLE FREAKING OUT A guy just held ordinary toilet paper under a UV light and what showed up is pure nightmare fuel... bright blue glowing spots that look straight out of a nuclear waste dump. He tore a piece off, got it wet, and the creepy blue substance started coming right off onto his hands. He even claims the same chemical glow is showing up in women’s tampons. The comment section went nuclear as people begged him to test every brand. Some toilet papers lit up like a Christmas tree while a few barely glowed, and now viewers are already talking about stealing the single-ply rolls from public bathrooms just to survive. Would you keep wiping with this after seeing it glow like toxic waste… or are you switching to leaves?

HustleBitch

297,012 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Engravings from the 19th century depicting the so-called 'phenomena' of BALL LIGHTNING... Some have claimed the video here is 'fake'... Yet many have observed these erratically moving glowing ORBS during severe thunderstorms, and there are many 'theories'... Russian scientist Vladimir Torchigin contends the phenomenon isn't lightning but a BUBBLE OF LIGHT that becomes trapped inside a 'sphere of air.' Particles can be absorbed and emit electromagnetic radiation during a storm. He theorised that this LIGHT in a pressurised sphere was a 'billion times' more potent than light moving in a straight line... Another explanation it's claimed is that these spheres of FIERY LIGHT are formed from the 'electrical charge' a LIGHTNING STRIKE generates. SILICON in the soil combines with CARBON and OXYGEN. The oxygen and carbon form SILICON VAPOUR that cools and creates a cloud of 'fine dust'. Could this be PLASMA DUST? What do you know of it?...

Engravings from the 19th century depicting the so-called 'phenomena' of BALL LIGHTNING... Some have claimed the video here is 'fake'... Yet many have observed these erratically moving glowing ORBS during severe thunderstorms, and there are many 'theories'... Russian scientist Vladimir Torchigin contends the phenomenon isn't lightning but a BUBBLE OF LIGHT that becomes trapped inside a 'sphere of air.' Particles can be absorbed and emit electromagnetic radiation during a storm. He theorised that this LIGHT in a pressurised sphere was a 'billion times' more potent than light moving in a straight line... Another explanation it's claimed is that these spheres of FIERY LIGHT are formed from the 'electrical charge' a LIGHTNING STRIKE generates. SILICON in the soil combines with CARBON and OXYGEN. The oxygen and carbon form SILICON VAPOUR that cools and creates a cloud of 'fine dust'. Could this be PLASMA DUST? What do you know of it?...

WhatdoIknow

22,873 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Dr. Jack Kruse just revealed how blue light causes skin cancer. He says the proof is in how we treat people with severe burns. Kruse is a neurosurgeon who says when burn surgeons or doctors treat burn victims, they use blue light directly on the wound. "You put blue light on a burn victim, you know what it does? It stimulates the skin to grow faster." That same mechanism is exactly what makes blue light dangerous under normal conditions. Cancer is uncontrolled cell growth. Blue light triggers rapid cell division. On a burn wound that's helpful. On healthy skin every day for years, it's a problem. • Your laptop emits blue light • Your phone screen emits blue light • The LED bulbs in your ceiling emit blue light Kruse says incandescent bulbs naturally offset this because they contain UV and red light alongside the blue. Those bulbs are being banned completely by 2028. The frequency that causes cancer is in every room you enter. The frequency that counteracted it is being legislated out of existence. — Dr. Jack Kruse (☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆) on the Danny Jones (Danny Jones) podcast PS: If interested in content like this, follow me as I continue sharing unconventional health insights you won't find anywhere else on X.

Dr. Jack Kruse just revealed how blue light causes skin cancer. He says the proof is in how we treat people with severe burns. Kruse is a neurosurgeon who says when burn surgeons or doctors treat burn victims, they use blue light directly on the wound. "You put blue light on a burn victim, you know what it does? It stimulates the skin to grow faster." That same mechanism is exactly what makes blue light dangerous under normal conditions. Cancer is uncontrolled cell growth. Blue light triggers rapid cell division. On a burn wound that's helpful. On healthy skin every day for years, it's a problem. • Your laptop emits blue light • Your phone screen emits blue light • The LED bulbs in your ceiling emit blue light Kruse says incandescent bulbs naturally offset this because they contain UV and red light alongside the blue. Those bulbs are being banned completely by 2028. The frequency that causes cancer is in every room you enter. The frequency that counteracted it is being legislated out of existence. — Dr. Jack Kruse (☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆) on the Danny Jones (Danny Jones) podcast PS: If interested in content like this, follow me as I continue sharing unconventional health insights you won't find anywhere else on X.

Goku

70,187 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Nothing like a little cosmic glow to brighten your orbit. ✨ This timelapse from the International International Space Station captures vibrant green aurora ribbons sweeping across Earth’s curve as station hardware drifts into view. Aboard this shared home in low Earth orbit, astronauts from around the world live and work side‑by‑side, a daily reminder that exploration is strongest when nations do it together. Auroras form when charged particles from the Sun interact with Earth’s magnetic field and atmosphere, creating waves of light that ripple across the sky. Science, perspective, and global partnership — all in one pass.

Nothing like a little cosmic glow to brighten your orbit. ✨ This timelapse from the International International Space Station captures vibrant green aurora ribbons sweeping across Earth’s curve as station hardware drifts into view. Aboard this shared home in low Earth orbit, astronauts from around the world live and work side‑by‑side, a daily reminder that exploration is strongest when nations do it together. Auroras form when charged particles from the Sun interact with Earth’s magnetic field and atmosphere, creating waves of light that ripple across the sky. Science, perspective, and global partnership — all in one pass.

NASA's Johnson Space Center

25,576 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

KIMMEL DEFENDS THE JOKE: "I said, 'our first lady Melania's here, look at her, so beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow. Which, obviously, was a joke about their age difference- and the look of joy we see on her face every time they're together. It was a very light roast joke about the fact that he's almost 80 and she's younger than I am. It was not by any stretch of the definition a call to assassination."

KIMMEL DEFENDS THE JOKE: "I said, 'our first lady Melania's here, look at her, so beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow. Which, obviously, was a joke about their age difference- and the look of joy we see on her face every time they're together. It was a very light roast joke about the fact that he's almost 80 and she's younger than I am. It was not by any stretch of the definition a call to assassination."

Jorge Bonilla

2,023,864 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

We asked Standard Nuclear CEO Kurt Terrani about the nuclear myth that bothers him most: "There is radiation going through me right now, and there's radiation going through you right now. That's called natural background radiation. We all get it." "When you go take a flight, you get a little bit more. When you go to the dentist or the chest X-ray, you get a lot more. A lot more certainly than I experience day-to-day at a nuclear fuel plant." "Take arsenic. Below 200 parts per billion is safe. So 250 parts per billion is toxic. You pour a little clean water into it, bring it down below 200. We're hydrated, we're high-fiving, we're happy." "But with radiation, no, no, no. It's the only thing that somehow anything above zero is bad, and we ignore the fact that it's naturally all around us. It's not just archaic, it's wrong."

We asked Standard Nuclear CEO Kurt Terrani about the nuclear myth that bothers him most: "There is radiation going through me right now, and there's radiation going through you right now. That's called natural background radiation. We all get it." "When you go take a flight, you get a little bit more. When you go to the dentist or the chest X-ray, you get a lot more. A lot more certainly than I experience day-to-day at a nuclear fuel plant." "Take arsenic. Below 200 parts per billion is safe. So 250 parts per billion is toxic. You pour a little clean water into it, bring it down below 200. We're hydrated, we're high-fiving, we're happy." "But with radiation, no, no, no. It's the only thing that somehow anything above zero is bad, and we ignore the fact that it's naturally all around us. It's not just archaic, it's wrong."

MTS

47,174 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Dr. Jack Kruse just revealed how blue light hijacks the dopamine reward pathways in your brain. Your phone, laptop, and TV are all running on a light that keeps your dopamine low by design. He says this was engineered on purpose. Kruse is a neurosurgeon who traced where this blue light display technology came from: 1) In the 1950s, DARPA funded IBM to develop liquid crystal displays using blue light. Side note: DARPA is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. They build military technology. The internet started there. 2) In 1995, DARPA gave the search algorithm to two Stanford students who founded Google along with this technology 3) Today, Meta and Google own the patents on how this light is delivered through every screen you use. Kruse asked one question no one in tech has answered. Why does every screen on Earth default to blue light? You need third-party software just to get red light on your own device. Kruse says the reason is simple. Blue light at specific frequencies makes screens addictive. It lowers dopamine over time. It makes users more compliant and easier to influence. DARPA wants it sticky so people can be programmed through the content they consume. He says 55% of the American population has already been affected by screen technology in exactly this way. The blue glow on your face right now isn't accidental. According to Kruse, it never was. — Jack Kruse (☣️ Jack Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩 ☀️) on the Danny Jones (Danny Jones) Podcast

Dr. Jack Kruse just revealed how blue light hijacks the dopamine reward pathways in your brain. Your phone, laptop, and TV are all running on a light that keeps your dopamine low by design. He says this was engineered on purpose. Kruse is a neurosurgeon who traced where this blue light display technology came from: 1) In the 1950s, DARPA funded IBM to develop liquid crystal displays using blue light. Side note: DARPA is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. They build military technology. The internet started there. 2) In 1995, DARPA gave the search algorithm to two Stanford students who founded Google along with this technology 3) Today, Meta and Google own the patents on how this light is delivered through every screen you use. Kruse asked one question no one in tech has answered. Why does every screen on Earth default to blue light? You need third-party software just to get red light on your own device. Kruse says the reason is simple. Blue light at specific frequencies makes screens addictive. It lowers dopamine over time. It makes users more compliant and easier to influence. DARPA wants it sticky so people can be programmed through the content they consume. He says 55% of the American population has already been affected by screen technology in exactly this way. The blue glow on your face right now isn't accidental. According to Kruse, it never was. — Jack Kruse (☣️ Jack Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩 ☀️) on the Danny Jones (Danny Jones) Podcast

Goku

4,675,926 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 NEW SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH COULD REVEAL PLASMATE INTELLIGENCE & COMMUNICATION LANGUAGE THROUGH LIGHT What if the luminescence we see in plasma orbs, or Plasmates, is not simply a glow, but information? And what if we could test whether they are communicating, responding to their environment, and even displaying inorganic (non-human) intelligence? A new scientific paper I found, put alongside the paper I looked at last week from Michael Levin on intelligence and consciousness, has given me an exciting new hypothesis, a testable one!? In 'Assouline & Capua, “Faraday effects emerging from the optical magnetic field,” they discovered that the magnetic component of light itself can directly influence matter. And that led me to an extraordinary possibility. Plasma is made from electrically charged particles. It naturally produces electric and magnetic fields, and their own visible light. Until now, we have generally treated that glow as a by-product — simply energy escaping from the plasma. But what if the light is actually part of the system, the network architecture of intelligence and possibly communication? Have a listen to my thoughts in more detail and you will also see images from the paper referred to as part of the video Now all I need to do is find a plasma physicist with some funding to go and test it out... 🤔 #plasma #electromagnetics Nathaniel Hanks J2 HōloÇyphâ ALIENPROTOCOLS

🚨 NEW SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH COULD REVEAL PLASMATE INTELLIGENCE & COMMUNICATION LANGUAGE THROUGH LIGHT What if the luminescence we see in plasma orbs, or Plasmates, is not simply a glow, but information? And what if we could test whether they are communicating, responding to their environment, and even displaying inorganic (non-human) intelligence? A new scientific paper I found, put alongside the paper I looked at last week from Michael Levin on intelligence and consciousness, has given me an exciting new hypothesis, a testable one!? In 'Assouline & Capua, “Faraday effects emerging from the optical magnetic field,” they discovered that the magnetic component of light itself can directly influence matter. And that led me to an extraordinary possibility. Plasma is made from electrically charged particles. It naturally produces electric and magnetic fields, and their own visible light. Until now, we have generally treated that glow as a by-product — simply energy escaping from the plasma. But what if the light is actually part of the system, the network architecture of intelligence and possibly communication? Have a listen to my thoughts in more detail and you will also see images from the paper referred to as part of the video Now all I need to do is find a plasma physicist with some funding to go and test it out... 🤔 #plasma #electromagnetics Nathaniel Hanks J2 HōloÇyphâ ALIENPROTOCOLS

Moneypenny

11,586 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

$Earth is an enclosed system, covered by a firmament dome that separates us from the waters above. The Sun and Moon are local, following an electromagnetic circular track around Polaris. Next time you watch a sunset, note how the Sun drifts to the right as it approaches the horizon. This is because from our perspective on the ground, the Sun's clockwise motion (if looking DOWN on the system from above), appears from a ground observer to be a rightward drift. When you look at stars through a traditional, powerful zoom lens (NOT the new A.I.-manipulated telescopes that literally falsify cosmic imagery to show you what NASA wants), you can actually see the stars shimmering, exactly like light does in water. Because that's what stars are...lights in water. "Sun dogs" and rainbows take the shape they do due to the crystalline dome acting as a prism that refracts the Sun's light. This is easy to test at home - you can see the exact same phenomenon if you shine a light into a glass dome-shaped bowl. You will also only ever see rainbows creating a dome shape outdoors, not indoors, as that shape is a direct result of the firmament's prism encapsulating the entire outdoor environment on Earth.$

Earth is an enclosed system, covered by a firmament dome that separates us from the waters above. The Sun and Moon are local, following an electromagnetic circular track around Polaris. Next time you watch a sunset, note how the Sun drifts to the right as it approaches the horizon. This is because from our perspective on the ground, the Sun's clockwise motion (if looking DOWN on the system from above), appears from a ground observer to be a rightward drift. When you look at stars through a traditional, powerful zoom lens (NOT the new A.I.-manipulated telescopes that literally falsify cosmic imagery to show you what NASA wants), you can actually see the stars shimmering, exactly like light does in water. Because that's what stars are...lights in water. "Sun dogs" and rainbows take the shape they do due to the crystalline dome acting as a prism that refracts the Sun's light. This is easy to test at home - you can see the exact same phenomenon if you shine a light into a glass dome-shaped bowl. You will also only ever see rainbows creating a dome shape outdoors, not indoors, as that shape is a direct result of the firmament's prism encapsulating the entire outdoor environment on Earth.

Ben Wehrman

37,989 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

👀 Filmed by me outside on our balcony. This is why LED light is dangerous to our mitochondria. First, let’s understand what we are seeing. Here it is -19°C = -2.2°F . Very different from the coast. The countryside is colder, darker, and holds ice in the air. What we’re seeing is artificial light from street lamps reflecting off ice crystals suspended in very cold air. At around -19°C (from my outdoor thermometer), the air can hold flat, plate-shaped ice crystals that float and slowly fall, almost like microscopic mirrors. 🤔 So why does the light go straight up? Because these ice crystals orient themselves horizontally as they fall. When light from a streetlamp hits them, it reflects vertically, creating straight columns that look like beams shooting into the sky. Our brains expect light to scatter. They are not designed to see perfectly straight columns of light at night. Cold air + ice crystals + modern LED streetlights (highly directional, extremely bright) creates an effect most of us never experienced historically. Older sodium lamps produced soft, diffuse glows. Modern LEDs produce sharp, aggressive pillars, especially in extreme cold. This combination produces light pillars regularly in winter. And this means something worse: Blue light is now being scattered above us and reflected back down, contaminating the night sky from every direction. That is why I call Norway a blue hell zone in winter. Cold should heal mitochondria. Darkness should protect them. LEDs destroy both.

👀 Filmed by me outside on our balcony. This is why LED light is dangerous to our mitochondria. First, let’s understand what we are seeing. Here it is -19°C = -2.2°F . Very different from the coast. The countryside is colder, darker, and holds ice in the air. What we’re seeing is artificial light from street lamps reflecting off ice crystals suspended in very cold air. At around -19°C (from my outdoor thermometer), the air can hold flat, plate-shaped ice crystals that float and slowly fall, almost like microscopic mirrors. 🤔 So why does the light go straight up? Because these ice crystals orient themselves horizontally as they fall. When light from a streetlamp hits them, it reflects vertically, creating straight columns that look like beams shooting into the sky. Our brains expect light to scatter. They are not designed to see perfectly straight columns of light at night. Cold air + ice crystals + modern LED streetlights (highly directional, extremely bright) creates an effect most of us never experienced historically. Older sodium lamps produced soft, diffuse glows. Modern LEDs produce sharp, aggressive pillars, especially in extreme cold. This combination produces light pillars regularly in winter. And this means something worse: Blue light is now being scattered above us and reflected back down, contaminating the night sky from every direction. That is why I call Norway a blue hell zone in winter. Cold should heal mitochondria. Darkness should protect them. LEDs destroy both.

Light Me Away ☀️

50,928 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Universities teach many erroneous models. One example of a misleading teaching is the Newtonian model of the prism. A man named Johann Goethe corrected and complimented Newton's model about 100 years after Newton. It is not the same light passing through the prism and distributing. It is a brand-new light with each beam of color. The primary light hitting the prism is extinguished by the electrons making up the glass of the prism itself. Those same electrons re-emit a brand new light from each angle. That process happens at the rate of c. Serving the illusion that the original white light came it... separated and exited to continue on. Most people rely on outdated text books or the Pink Floyd album cover "Dark Side of the Moon" to get their information about light and color and prisms. The depictions of light "splitting" and "bending" through a prism based on their color is false. (See first comments for attached images and substantiation) I filmed these videos playing around with prisms, lasers, magnifying glasses, mirrors, slits, and colored filters. I've gained my own perspectives on light and color over the years from real world, hands-on experimentation and observation. Most people have never held a real glass prism their own hands and done the tests to see for themselves. 2 prisms for $10 Harmonics of Light and Sound: This guy said his units were confiscated by the FBI and he was threatened not to pursue manufacturing them. The unit is simply a light with a magnifying glass and colored filters to isolate the light. Like burning an ant with a focal point... but with a specific color. The lens can spin and create a stroboscopic effect in an isolated band. The inventor claimed it healed stuff. Dinshah Spectro-Chrome Machine - Tour and Explanation Magenta monochromatic ray of shadow - Pehr Sahlstrom: Color and Physics, Newton versus Goethe - Pehr Sahlstrom: Thomas Joseph Brown Color Theory: Clay Taylor Color Theory: Testing the "Rightness" of relativity. The impossibility of proving something through experiments. Laser and Mirror observation: It's never the same light. Re-emission Example: I put this interactive page together going back and forth with ChatGPT to code using Javascript. Here is a video playing with the slide controls to show 3 different sinewaves (3 different lights/emissions). The packets are ALWAYS in phase from medium to medium. The frequency shifts BECAUSE the velocity of light shifts. NOT a Doppler shift of "the same light" distorting within the same frame of reference. It's a brand new light at each point. The incoming light is a different frame of reference. All the light you ever see is the re-emitted light from the electrons making up yourself. Propagation and Re-Emission of Light: Dr. Edward Dowdye Slides - LOTS of math and context. E.H. Dowdye, Can Stars BEND LIGHT? General Relativity and Gravity with Dr. Edward Dowdye Challenges to Gravitational Lensing and More: 71 Part Video Series (Each vid is 1 min - 1 and a hafl min) The Rebirth of Classical Physics - Time, Light & Gravity Classical Physics vs Relativity - History, Examples and Alternatives: Illusions of Relativity: Space-Time vs Real-Time The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity - Article Packed with Info & Links Thought Experiment for Light and Absolute Time. (This scenario got me banned from talking on a Podcast.) "Too off the rails."

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

44,361 просмотров • 1 год назад

Ever hear Albert Einstein’s voice? He’s him explaining his formula, E=mc² It is probably the most famous formula in the world, but what exactly does it mean? Let's start by defining each letter in the formula: E = Energy M = Mass C = Speed of light (a very large number) If we were to read the formula, we would say, "Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared." The formula itself is rather simple in that it essentially says that energy and mass are different forms of the same thing; they are interchangeable. So are you saying a beam of light and a banana are different forms of the same thing? Yes, in our head, this may not make sense, but it does in nature. This discovery was groundbreaking at the time because people had previously believed that energy could only be created by kinetic or potential energy. You can increase kinetic energy by accelerating your car. You can increase potential energy by stretching a rubber band. Einstein demonstrated that there was a third form, which is that things have energy because they simply exist. Ok, so why is mass multiplied by the speed of light? Whenever you are converting mass to pure energy, it is by nature moving at the speed of light. Pure energy is an electromagnetic radiation, which travels at 186,000 miles/sec (300,000 km/sec). Ok, cool, but why is the speed of light squared? This again has to do with the nature of energy. If an object is moving twice as fast as another object, it does not have twice as much energy. Rather, it has four times as much energy. Hence, the speed of light is squared, which comes out to a very big number. C^2 is the conversion factor from mass to energy. The bottom line is that even small objects have an immense amount of energy. Through the process of nuclear fusion/fission via nuclear power plants, we can harness some of this energy. In the atomic bomb that destroyed the city of Hiroshima, there was about 700 milligrams (equivalent to the weight of 1/3 of a dime) of uranium which was converted to energy that destroyed everything within a 1-mile (1.6 km) blast radius.

Ever hear Albert Einstein’s voice? He’s him explaining his formula, E=mc² It is probably the most famous formula in the world, but what exactly does it mean? Let's start by defining each letter in the formula: E = Energy M = Mass C = Speed of light (a very large number) If we were to read the formula, we would say, "Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared." The formula itself is rather simple in that it essentially says that energy and mass are different forms of the same thing; they are interchangeable. So are you saying a beam of light and a banana are different forms of the same thing? Yes, in our head, this may not make sense, but it does in nature. This discovery was groundbreaking at the time because people had previously believed that energy could only be created by kinetic or potential energy. You can increase kinetic energy by accelerating your car. You can increase potential energy by stretching a rubber band. Einstein demonstrated that there was a third form, which is that things have energy because they simply exist. Ok, so why is mass multiplied by the speed of light? Whenever you are converting mass to pure energy, it is by nature moving at the speed of light. Pure energy is an electromagnetic radiation, which travels at 186,000 miles/sec (300,000 km/sec). Ok, cool, but why is the speed of light squared? This again has to do with the nature of energy. If an object is moving twice as fast as another object, it does not have twice as much energy. Rather, it has four times as much energy. Hence, the speed of light is squared, which comes out to a very big number. C^2 is the conversion factor from mass to energy. The bottom line is that even small objects have an immense amount of energy. Through the process of nuclear fusion/fission via nuclear power plants, we can harness some of this energy. In the atomic bomb that destroyed the city of Hiroshima, there was about 700 milligrams (equivalent to the weight of 1/3 of a dime) of uranium which was converted to energy that destroyed everything within a 1-mile (1.6 km) blast radius.

Historic Vids

2,424,303 просмотров • 3 лет назад

🚨Thorium Reactors: China Just Did What Everyone Else Talked About for 50 Years China has just crossed a line the rest of the world never managed to step over. Their experimental thorium molten salt reactor has successfully converted thorium into uranium-233 and sustained nuclear fission inside a working system. This matters more than most people realize. Thorium has always been the nuclear fuel that sounded great in theory and died in practice. It is more abundant than uranium. It produces less long lived waste. It is also harder to weaponize. The physics have been understood since the Cold War, but the problem was always execution, materials, corrosion and chemistry. Control. China solved enough of those problems to make the fuel cycle work. The reactor in question is small, producing only two megawatts so it's not powering cities or feeding the grid, but that is not the point. This was a proof of capability, not a commercial rollout. They demonstrated something no other country has publicly demonstrated. Breeding uranium-233 from thorium inside a molten salt reactor and using it to sustain fission. That single step unlocks the entire thorium fuel cycle. They did it with a reactor that operates at atmospheric pressure, uses liquid fuel, and can be designed to shut itself down passively if things go wrong. No danger of high pressure steam explosions, no fuel rods to melt and no water cooling dependency. China has large domestic thorium reserves. Uranium supply chains are global, fragile, and politically exposed. Thorium changes that equation. It also changes waste profiles and long term fuel availability. In theory, it allows centuries of base load power from material that was previously treated as a curiosity. The United States, Europe, and others studied molten salt reactors decades ago and walked away. Not because they were impossible, but because conventional uranium reactors were already entrenched, regulated, and profitable. Thorium was disruptive before disruption was fashionable. China stayed with it and built materials science programs around it. They accepted slow progress. They ran experiments without promising headlines, and now they are the only country that can point to an operating thorium molten salt reactor that actually does what the textbooks said it should. This does not mean commercial thorium power is around the corner. Scaling this is hard and so is licensing it. Operating molten salt systems for decades is hard. But the breakthrough is real. If the technology that could redefine nuclear safety, fuel independence, and long term energy stability just matured outside the West, what else are we assuming is impossible simply because we stopped trying? #Thorium #NuclearEnergy #China #EnergySecurity #MoltenSaltReactor #CleanEnergy #AdvancedNuclear Video clip source:

🚨Thorium Reactors: China Just Did What Everyone Else Talked About for 50 Years China has just crossed a line the rest of the world never managed to step over. Their experimental thorium molten salt reactor has successfully converted thorium into uranium-233 and sustained nuclear fission inside a working system. This matters more than most people realize. Thorium has always been the nuclear fuel that sounded great in theory and died in practice. It is more abundant than uranium. It produces less long lived waste. It is also harder to weaponize. The physics have been understood since the Cold War, but the problem was always execution, materials, corrosion and chemistry. Control. China solved enough of those problems to make the fuel cycle work. The reactor in question is small, producing only two megawatts so it's not powering cities or feeding the grid, but that is not the point. This was a proof of capability, not a commercial rollout. They demonstrated something no other country has publicly demonstrated. Breeding uranium-233 from thorium inside a molten salt reactor and using it to sustain fission. That single step unlocks the entire thorium fuel cycle. They did it with a reactor that operates at atmospheric pressure, uses liquid fuel, and can be designed to shut itself down passively if things go wrong. No danger of high pressure steam explosions, no fuel rods to melt and no water cooling dependency. China has large domestic thorium reserves. Uranium supply chains are global, fragile, and politically exposed. Thorium changes that equation. It also changes waste profiles and long term fuel availability. In theory, it allows centuries of base load power from material that was previously treated as a curiosity. The United States, Europe, and others studied molten salt reactors decades ago and walked away. Not because they were impossible, but because conventional uranium reactors were already entrenched, regulated, and profitable. Thorium was disruptive before disruption was fashionable. China stayed with it and built materials science programs around it. They accepted slow progress. They ran experiments without promising headlines, and now they are the only country that can point to an operating thorium molten salt reactor that actually does what the textbooks said it should. This does not mean commercial thorium power is around the corner. Scaling this is hard and so is licensing it. Operating molten salt systems for decades is hard. But the breakthrough is real. If the technology that could redefine nuclear safety, fuel independence, and long term energy stability just matured outside the West, what else are we assuming is impossible simply because we stopped trying? #Thorium #NuclearEnergy #China #EnergySecurity #MoltenSaltReactor #CleanEnergy #AdvancedNuclear Video clip source:

Skywatch Signal

148,292 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Last week, we were treated to the most incredible aurora borealis I have ever seen. There was a major coronal mass ejection from the Sun, and as those particles reach Earth, they interact with our magnetic field and our upper atmosphere to create the green, red, and blue/purple hues that we see. I spent most of the evening just staring out of the Cupola windows – it was as if we were surrounded by a glowing fog of red. I tried to capture it in a timelapse video. Sergey Kud-Sverchkov also got a great picture of me as we were all enjoying the light show!

Last week, we were treated to the most incredible aurora borealis I have ever seen. There was a major coronal mass ejection from the Sun, and as those particles reach Earth, they interact with our magnetic field and our upper atmosphere to create the green, red, and blue/purple hues that we see. I spent most of the evening just staring out of the Cupola windows – it was as if we were surrounded by a glowing fog of red. I tried to capture it in a timelapse video. Sergey Kud-Sverchkov also got a great picture of me as we were all enjoying the light show!

Chris Williams

34,133 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Valar Atomics CEO Isaiah Taylor - making nuclear reactors says he doesn't need a technical edge to win. "We want this reactor to be as simple as possible. If we could just staple this thing together from Ikea, then this would be a trillion-dollar company much faster." "There are two philosophies that we use in building the reactors. We either try to buy things that are completely off the shelf or we make it ourselves." "We're trying to go 100x faster than the nuclear industry has ever gone before. So if we're plugging too deeply into the existing network, it's not going to work that well. We want to use off-the-shelf things and make things ourselves when we can't buy something off the shelf." "The nuclear industry is full of very smart people. It's full of physics people, PhDs, and people who have spent their life doing complex analysis, and they actually want something that is a little bit complicated. It's an ego thing to design something that is complicated and looks very sophisticated... It's our preference that [our reactors] are so simple that somebody with a nuclear PhD looks at it and says, 'That's like a toy,' and it's great because people make toys in the millions."

Valar Atomics CEO Isaiah Taylor - making nuclear reactors says he doesn't need a technical edge to win. "We want this reactor to be as simple as possible. If we could just staple this thing together from Ikea, then this would be a trillion-dollar company much faster." "There are two philosophies that we use in building the reactors. We either try to buy things that are completely off the shelf or we make it ourselves." "We're trying to go 100x faster than the nuclear industry has ever gone before. So if we're plugging too deeply into the existing network, it's not going to work that well. We want to use off-the-shelf things and make things ourselves when we can't buy something off the shelf." "The nuclear industry is full of very smart people. It's full of physics people, PhDs, and people who have spent their life doing complex analysis, and they actually want something that is a little bit complicated. It's an ego thing to design something that is complicated and looks very sophisticated... It's our preference that [our reactors] are so simple that somebody with a nuclear PhD looks at it and says, 'That's like a toy,' and it's great because people make toys in the millions."

TBPN

118,332 просмотров • 17 дней назад

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference. 2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording… then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3. Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

16,608 просмотров • 1 год назад