Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
What’s the difference between #NetZero & Zero emissions? “#NetZero implies we won’t be able to eliminate everything”, says #IPCC Lead Author @oliver_geden. So, what happens to those emissions we can’t eliminate? Find out more from the WGIII Fact Sheet➡️
10 Comments

@JimSkeaIPCC @Oliver_Geden I’ve watched this several times trying to escape my initial view that, in isolation, this is a dangerous clip to distribute. It is reminiscent of a Hollywood trailer for a dystopian movie where the little people are assured by the elites they have everything under control.

@Oliver_Geden This is effed up guys. When are u going to hit the panic button 🤔 #HowWeGetThere Sharp impossible cuts needed by Western nations yesterday 🤔 "it is too late for Canada to do its fair share to avoid 1.5°C of global warming" Simon Donner @ubc

@Oliver_Geden Translation: Efforts to achieve anti-gravity are proceeding. We have successfully thrown balls in the air and are awaiting results.

@Oliver_Geden There is no climate emergency. Anthropogenic climate change is a monumental fraud.

@Oliver_Geden What's the difference? None! There is no difference. They're both scams.

@Oliver_Geden Trees remove 2bn tonnes per year. Technologies 200 million. Last year we emitted 36 billion. The total is 1600 billion. Natural carbon sinks are shrinking. Technologies - with FFs to build maybe get to 1 billion. Maybe. Can someone buy the IPCC a calculator?

@Oliver_Geden Such a dumb way to phrase it…yeah that’s why there is a NET preceding it. Sustainability, constantly pissing in the wind.

@Oliver_Geden Quick question on whether the IPCC report generated enough discussion?

@Oliver_Geden #climatescam

@Oliver_Geden Sorry but your supposidly scientists no mention of hemp, bamboo to closed loop manufacturing which makes ccs obsolete, steel, cement should be moving to polymer based to metals all from non liner extraction, where's the talk for these scenarios, u all just to appease the corps

