Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

When asked about his “monsters” speech, Mamdani shows he understands that be could have used more specific language to make his point clear. So why doesn’t he apologize? This vagueness is EXACTLY what Jews are so frightened by. We can disagree on policy, but not on the basic principle...

32,269 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I think the presenter is on to something big, but where I disagree with her is that she accuses African leaders and gives a subtle pass to African citizens. It is not true that African citizens were oblivious to what Trump or Epstein are. They knew, but they simply did not have the ability to think critically that when Trump talks about LGBT issues, it is not necessarily that he does not support them, but that he understood there is a group of foolish people out there who would buy into that rhetoric without interrogating why he was deploying it. Some of Trump’s best friends, like Peter Mandelson, are gay, yet some Africans were foolish enough to believe that Trump is anti-gay. He simply understood how human beings operate, that there are times when people fail to think, a tragic failure to think, and they just go with the flow. If you ask Africans today what they gained from the perceived homophobia that Trump projected, which we know was political theatre targeted at a particular audience, they will not be able to tell you. Trump might be many things to many people. I do not like him and everybody knows that, but the one thing I respect him for is that he understands his audience. He knows what to say when he is talking to foolish people. He knows what to say when he is talking to idiotic people. He knows what to say when he is talking to sycophants. He knows what to say when he is talking to people who do not understand the world of politics, and he gets away with it. And for that, I give it to him. He becomes a political superstar precisely because you then have black people in Africa supporting him. That in itself shows you the scale of political illiteracy that exists, where people rally behind rhetoric crafted to manipulate them, not to advance their interests.

Hopewell Chin’ono

20,339 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Mamdani was asked over and over whether it bothered him that an 18 person committee he personally advertised as diverse and representative of New York City contained no Jews, and he flatly refused to answer. Instead, he hid behind a rambling speech about diversity, pointed to Jewish judges he appointed elsewhere as though that had anything to do with the committee in question, and repeated the pathetic Maxwell excuse while his own chief counsel defended an admitted Al Qaeda terrorist. He even emphasized that John Leventhal “collected legal fees,” as though being paid to represent a client is some kind of moral stain when the client is a white woman, but noble constitutional advocacy when the client is a terrorist. He knows exactly what Jewish New Yorkers are asking, he knows why this looks deliberate, and he has decided that we do not deserve a straight answer. He's doubling down because he has no shame. And as a side point, Mamdani’s sudden horror at any “association” with the Epstein world is especially rich given that he attended a 2017 luncheon hosted by Peggy Siegal, whose relationship with Epstein later destroyed her standing in Hollywood, while his own mother attended an afterparty at Ghislaine Maxwell’s townhouse. Mamdani understands this perfectly well when the association reaches his own family, but suddenly treats it as disqualifying when he needs an excuse to reject a Jewish former judge from a committee with no Jews. Absolutely disgraceful behavior.

Yehuda Teitelbaum

165,698 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat