When digital art is reused.

@Thebestfigen It WASN’T digital. It was hand drawn, photographed frame by frame which is why they reused the motion. I get it. I do. But, it took far more effort in those days to create these films than it does today or did even 20 years ago.

@Thebestfigen "digital art" ??

@Thebestfigen Everything was hand drawn frame by frame of course they would reuse some of the methods

@Thebestfigen So we complain about modern video game studios, but Disney has been recycling the same level, charging full price, and selling us DLCs since 1967 and we didn’t even notice.

@Thebestfigen It’s not re-used animation . It’s re-redrawn completely. They only retained the actors path and movement in the scene for perceived perspective and symmetry .

@Thebestfigen

@Thebestfigen Winnie Pegged A Pothole #Winnipeg

@Thebestfigen It always amuses me when people say copying is a new AI thing xD

@Thebestfigen That's not digital art you fucking idiot.

@Thebestfigen Oh my lord! I’ve watched those old movies but, never caught that detail.

@Thebestfigen I think you mean analog art

@Thebestfigen They are both hand animated, not digital. It isn't plagerism but rather the same studio/company re-using rotoscoped footage for different projects. A common practice in early animation. They drew every frame, by hand.

@Thebestfigen this isn't reuse, it's plagiarism with extra steps digital doesn't mean disposable. every piece has a creator who deserves credit and compensation the whole "everything's free on the internet" mentality killed respect for craft

@Thebestfigen Wow, somebody did NOT want to reinvent the wheel that day… 🤣

@Thebestfigen Wow

@Thebestfigen It's not digital and it was common to reuse hand drawn animation back then due to costs.

@Thebestfigen back when reusing ideas actually gave good results, instead of these shitty reboots

@Thebestfigen WoW! a.i. doing the same thing Lazy humans and lazy robots

@Thebestfigen did not understood but watch it fully because it was giving good vibes

@Thebestfigen Go watch animated films like “Fire and Ice” and notice how “realistic” the animation looks… because they filmed real actors and then drew to match the motion… does that take away from the art?

@Thebestfigen What, nobody’s seen the Flintstones?

@Thebestfigen No wonder I sometimes felt a sense of familiarity when watching anime in the past

@Thebestfigen Not bad

@Thebestfigen There was nothing digital about either one of those animations other than it exists now in a digital form

@Thebestfigen This was not digital. And it was just more productive to reuse character animations as they did.

@Thebestfigen ..a diferencia de la tecnología actual, esa tecnica les ahorraba días de trabajo. Además, nadie se quejaba.

@Thebestfigen Eh olga copiando a #luzu

@Thebestfigen Perfectly well

@Thebestfigen IS THIS ANYTHING LIKE : IF MY WALLET WAS STOEN IN JAPAN....

@Thebestfigen Much better than the current crap

@Thebestfigen every day of my life is reused

@Thebestfigen *analogue art

@Thebestfigen There are a lot suchs