Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

When Marlowe’s British Kitchen opened in Leeds, Rabbi Gilbert asked the Muslim owners, Jenade Yamin and Arabaab “Paddy” Munir if they would consider making it kosher as well as halal. They did not have to. It meant change and cost. Paddy thought about it and said yes. Now there...

482,168 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Esther McVey calls for clearer labelling of halal and kosher meats in the UK She argued that consumers concerned about animal welfare particularly where pre‑stunning isn’t used - (88% of halal meat in the UK is pre-stunned) Transcript: “I beg to move, That leave be given to bring in a Bill to introduce compulsory labelling of halal and kosher meat and products containing halal and kosher meat; and for connected purposes. This is a Bill about animal welfare, transparency in meat production and consumer choice. It does not seek to ban halal or kosher meat. It seeks to ensure that it is clearly labelled. It is important that consumers have such information so that they can make an informed choice about what they are buying. Currently consumers do not have that information, and many are purchasing and consuming halal and kosher meat without their knowledge and agreement. The unique process of halal and kosher meat requires the animal to have its throat slit. In the case of halal meat, the animal is often stunned before it is killed — although it might not be — and for the shechita killing for kosher meat, there is no pre‑stunning. This lack of stunning causes the animal to experience severe pain. An individual concerned about animal welfare would want to know if the animal has been stunned prior to slaughter. Likewise, there are many religious groups who want to know what they are consuming too and whether the meat has been blessed by another religion. In all those cases clear labelling is essential to make an informed choice. Currently, the legislation that regulates animal slaughter is set out in assimilated EU regulation 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing, as well as in the Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing (England) Regulations 2015. Under these laws, animals must be stunned before they are killed, but exemptions exist for killing without stunning in accordance with specific religious rites. Added to that, there are currently no requirements for such meat to be labelled. What was once an exemption to the accepted stunning process of animals has become a growing part of the UK’s meat market. The Government’s own figures show that of the 1.035 billion animals processed in English and Welsh slaughterhouses in 2024, an estimated 214.6 million were slaughtered to produce halal meat. The analysis shows that the proportion of meat supplied by non‑stun slaughter is about four times greater than the proportion of Muslims and Jews in the UK. Although Government guidance is clear that meat that results from non‑stun slaughter “must be intended for consumption by Jews or Muslims”, production is clearly going way beyond that, so much so that the UK now exports halal meat. Between 2018 and 2019, there was an almost 700 % increase in the volume of sheep meat exported to the United Arab Emirates, all of which is required to be halal. Clearly, without compulsory labelling of non‑stunned meat, slaughterhouses have gone down the route of producing more of it. In effect, a two‑tier system has been created, whereby some slaughterhouses comply with stunning laws and others do not, citing the religious exemption, though without ever intending to focus their sale on that market. Unfortunately, a driver of the market for non‑stunned meat is the fact that a step of the process is removed, meaning that production of non‑stunned meat is cheaper. Supermarkets and food outlets can purchase that cheaper meat without ever declaring it to the customer, which is not what was intended by the legislation. We have seen many examples of this over the last 15 years; Britain’s biggest retailers — such as Sainsbury’s, Tesco, Marks & Spencer and Asda — have sold halal or kosher meat without informing the consumer, as have Domino’s, Pizza Hut and KFC. Non‑stunned produce is being used by 17 local councils in schools, the majority of which are not Islamic faith schools, without parents or children having the first idea about it. It is also being served in hospitals and local councils. In December, Labour put forward its much‑vaunted animal welfare strategy, a document lauded for its aim of “preventing animals suffering unnecessarily”, which included the banning of boiling live lobsters, banning the use of carbon dioxide to stun pigs, and steps to ensure the more humane slaughter of farmed fish. I was surprised and alarmed to see no mention of the more humane slaughter of animals and the labelling of halal and kosher meat. There was a clear opportunity to call for the labelling of halal and kosher meat, but it was missed. Nowhere in Labour’s 12,500‑word animal welfare strategy was it mentioned. We often hear in the House that the UK holds the status of a world leader in animal welfare, but such a glaring gap shows that this country can no longer make such a claim. Food and You 2, which is a biannual official statistic survey commissioned by the Food Standards Agency, found that the most common spontaneously expressed food concern in 2024 was “food production method”. In August 2022, almost 99 % of respondents to the Government’s call for evidence on labelling for animal welfare said that method‑of‑slaughter labelling should be introduced. In research from the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, 92 % of halal consumers state that clear halal certification is important, so is it not time we updated our regulations and demanded that our meat was clearly and fully labelled, so that we know what we are buying and eating? Surely that is what consumer choice is all about, and I would wager that the overwhelming majority of animal lovers in the UK expect the House of Commons to support this Bill today. This Bill will give all consumers assurance that they know how their meat was produced. I urge all Members of the House to support this measure.”

Farrukh

10,729 views • 6 months ago

🗣️"For decades, the most influential and revered Orthodox Jew in New York was Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the so-called Lubavitcher Rebbe and hereditary leader of the Chabad movement. Every politician in New York, Jew or Gentile, genuflected to the good Rabbi. Schneerson died in 1992, but Hillary and the rest still pay tribute to him, expressing admiration for his wisdom and his piety. As a matter of fact, throughout his career, Schneerson preached the hatred of all non-Jews, which is inherent in Judaism. Other Orthodox Jews, such as Joseph Lieberman, are reticent about the more invidious aspects of their religion. In fact, they will simply lie to you about it if you question them. But Rabbi Schneerson wasn't reticent at all. He spelled it out for his followers in his lectures and his writings. He taught that non-Jews are subhuman, that they are like cattle created by the Jewish god Yahweh only to serve the Jews. He taught this openly over a period of many years. (.....) Ask yourself what kind of people could be governed by such a strange religion. You'll likely come to the same conclusion both Rabbi Schneerson and I have come to. The Jews and we really are completely different species. The Jews of the New York Times and all of the other Jews covered for Schneerson, of course. No one ever denounced his teaching or called him a hater. Instead, he always was praised as a sort of living saint. And as I said, the Gentile politicians who really know better still genuflect whenever his name is mentioned. And the Jews play right along. What contempt they must have for us. How easy it is to deceive us. And how easy it is to bleed us. But there are a few of us who aren't lemmings. A few of us who can see with our own eyes, and hear with our own ears, and figure things out for ourselves. That will be today when we begin settling the score with those who have been corrupting and bleeding our people for so long." - William Pierce - Why Jews are hated

Αναγεννώμενος Φοίνιξ (Reborn Phoenix)

12,983 views • 2 months ago

UAE’s🇦🇪 Mishal Kanoo: We want all of our neighbours, including IRAN, to PROSPER, reduces chances of hostility “We live in a neighbourhood where there are people of different nationalities and different cultures. I can’t choose my neighbours, I can’t tell my neighbours to shoo and go away, and they can’t tell me to shoo and go away. So I have to live with whoever my neighbours are and however they treat us. So, for example, for the UAE, specifically for Dubai, it is walking a very tight rope. We want to make sure that everybody knows that he or she is welcome here. He or she can come and do things over here and can make a life, a prosperous life for themselves here. We’re not here necessarily to take away from our neighbours. In fact, one of the things that Dubai wants to see, and I can see that from interacting with different business people and leadership here, is a desire to see our neighbours also prosper. Because if you have a beautiful mansion and your neighbour has a horrible house, it is normal for them to get angry and jealous. They will ask why you have a wonderful mansion and they don’t, and they may start casting stones and hurting you whenever you go out. However, if they have a mansion of their own, it doesn’t have to be the same as yours, it doesn’t have to be as large or as grand. In fact, if they have a bigger mansion, even better, because then they will leave you alone. So we want all our neighbours to have their own mansion, their own idea of what that mansion is. When everyone prospers and everyone benefits, there is less likely to be conflict, envy, and aggression towards one another.” -One of the UAE’s🇦🇪 most prominent businessmen Mishal Kanoo مشعل كانو, Chairman of the The Kanoo Group, and one of Gulf Business’s Top 100 Powerful Arabs 2025. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

44,773 views • 5 months ago

SHE’S 1000% RIGHT ‼️ While this takes place in the uk 🇬🇧, we KNOW this is happening here in Canada 🇨🇦 like the entitled guy at the gym demanding to carry a knife to workout 🤦🏻‍♂️ This guy walks into a regular British supermarket and demands they expand the halal section because “it’s too small.” Her response is perfect: Go to a Muslim supermarket then. Just like Jewish families drive to kosher stores when they need specific food. But instead of accepting that, he acts like the entire country owes him special treatment in every store. That’s not immigration. That’s entitlement. We’ve seen this movie before. In the UK, schools have been pressured to go fully halal. Prisons and hospitals have had the same fights. In parts of Canada, we’re already seeing demands for halal options in public institutions while the rest of us are told to just accept it. The double standard is insane. An English person walking into a supermarket in Pakistan or Saudi Arabia and demanding they stock more bacon and beer would be laughed out of the building — or worse. But here in the West, we’re expected to bend over backwards, change our culture, and act like noticing any of this makes us the problem. She nailed it. This isn’t about food. It’s about whether we still have the right to maintain our own countries and cultures without constant demands to accommodate everyone else’s. #cdnpoli #Immigration #Assimilation #Halal #CanadaFirst #WakeUp

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

17,779 views • 1 month ago

This is a pertinent clip from Sam Harris on the moral difference between Israel and her enemies. The moral difference comes down to understanding the answer to this question: what would each side do if they had the power to do it? TRANSCRIPT: The truth is that there is an obvious, undeniable, and hugely consequential moral difference between Israel and her enemies. The Israelis are surrounded by people who have explicitly genocidal intentions towards them. The charter of Hamas is explicitly genocidal. It looks forward to a time, based on Koranic prophesy, when the earth itself will cry out for Jewish blood, where the trees and the stones will say “O Muslim, there’s a Jew hiding behind me. Come and kill him.” This is a political document. We are talking about a government that was voted into power by a majority of Palestinians. The discourse in the Muslim world about Jews is utterly shocking. Not only is there widespread Holocaust denial—there’s Holocaust denial that then asserts that we will do it for real if given the chance. The only thing more obnoxious than denying the Holocaust is to say that it should have happened; it didn’t happen, but if we get the chance, we will accomplish it. There are children’s shows in the Palestinian territories and elsewhere that teach five-year-olds about the glories of martyrdom and about the necessity of killing Jews. And this gets to the heart of the moral difference between Israel and her enemies. And this is something I discussed in The End of Faith. To see this moral difference, you have to ask what each side would do if they had the power to do it. What would the Jews do to the Palestinians if they could do anything they wanted? Well, we know the answer to that question, because they can do more or less anything they want. The Israeli army could kill everyone in Gaza tomorrow. So what does that mean? Well, it means that, when they drop a bomb on a beach and kill four Palestinian children, as happened last week, this is almost certainly an accident. They’re not targeting children. They could target as many children as they want. Every time a Palestinian child dies, Israel edges ever closer to becoming an international pariah. So the Israelis take great pains not to kill children and other noncombatants. What do we know of the Palestinians? What would the Palestinians do to the Jews in Israel if the power imbalance were reversed? Well, they have told us what they would do. For some reason, Israel’s critics just don’t want to believe the worst about a group like Hamas, even when it declares the worst of itself. We’ve already had a Holocaust and several other genocides in the 20th century. People are capable of committing genocide. When they tell us they intend to commit genocide, we should listen. There is every reason to believe that the Palestinians would kill all the Jews in Israel if they could. Would every Palestinian support genocide? Of course not. But vast numbers of them—and of Muslims throughout the world—would. Needless to say, the Palestinians in general, not just Hamas, have a history of targeting innocent noncombatants in the most shocking ways possible. They’ve blown themselves up on buses and in restaurants. They’ve massacred teenagers. They’ve murdered Olympic athletes. They now shoot rockets indiscriminately into civilian areas. And again, the charter of their government in Gaza explicitly tells us that they want to annihilate the Jews—not just in Israel but everywhere.

Colin Wright

4,195,519 views • 2 years ago

“Jews are our enemies not because they occupied Palestine. They would have been enemies even if they did not occupy a thing.” Egyptian cleric Muhammad Hussein Ya’qoub on Al-Rahma TV: “If the Jews left Palestine to us, would we start loving them? Of course not. We will never love them. Absolutely not. The Jews are infidels – not because I say so, and not because they are killing Muslims, but because Allah said: “The Jews say that Uzair is the son of Allah, and the Christians say that Christ is the son of Allah. These are the words from their mouths. They imitate the sayings of the disbelievers before. May Allah fight them. How deluded they are.” It is Allah who said that they are infidels. Your belief regarding the Jews should be, first, that they are infidels, and second, that they are enemies. They are enemies not because they occupied Palestine. They would have been enemies even if they did not occupy a thing. Allah said: “You shall find the strongest men in enmity to the disbelievers [sic] to be the Jews and the polytheists.” Third, you must believe that the Jews will never stop fighting and killing us. They [fight] not for the sake of land and security, as they claim, but for the sake of their religion: “And they will not cease fighting you until they turn you back you’re your religion, if they can.” This is it. We must believe that our fighting with the Jews is eternal, and it will not end until the final battle – and this is the fourth point. You must believe that we will fight, defeat, and annihilate them, until not a single Jew remains on the face of the Earth. It is not me who says so. The Prophet said: “Judgment Day will not come until you fight the Jews and kill them. The Jews will hide behind stones and trees, and the stones and tree will call: Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him – except for the Gharqad tree, which is the tree of the Jews.” I have heard that they are planting many of these trees now. As for you Jews – the curse of Allah upon you. The curse of Allah upon you, whose ancestors were apes and pigs. You Jews have sown hatred in our hearts, and we have bequeathed it to our children and grandchildren. You will not survive as long as a single one of us remains. Oh Jews, may the curse of Allah be upon you. Oh Jews... Oh Allah, bring Your wrath, punishment, and torment down upon them. Allah, we pray that you transform them again, and make the Muslims rejoice again in seeing them as apes and pigs. You pigs of the earth! You pigs of the earth! You kill the Muslims with that cold pig [blood] of yours.”

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

207,580 views • 1 year ago

Scottie Scheffler says they didn’t find his ball on 17 and he actually asked people to stop searching for it: “The rules official said it landed just barely left of the grandstand thing. I don't know what you call that, like a sponsor area or something. And Teddy had a beat right on where it was coming down. So when we get up there, it's past the fence that marks the TIO, so he said anything that's in there is it part of the TIO. So then we said -- we tried to figure it out. I said, if I find it, does that help me; can I drop it -- since that would be about 50 yards closer to the hole. He said, yes, you can then use that spot, but you might have to go to the other side of the TIO, which I didn't know exactly where that would be, and that's not a great angle coming across there. “So decided to stop the search and go back and drop it doing point-of-entry TIO relief. Actually I did that once this year during the Byron as well. Not something I'm proud of but I was familiar with.” He went on to say: “I stopped them. They had guys pointing from up there, like it landed right here, and I just kind of hauled up there, and I was like, guys, get out of there, stop, do not find the ball. Fortunately it was my security guy that I've had for a few years here. His name is Brucey. And then Woody was up there as well. So both those guys are pretty -- I know them quite well, so when I said, please don't look for the ball, they got out of there.” The Open

Flushing It

1,780,530 views • 1 month ago