Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

When PK was released, several scenes became highly controversial. Many Hindu organizations, political leaders, and supporters argued that the film hurt Hindu religious sentiments and insulted Hindu deities. The controversy led to protests, public debates, and demands for accountability. Now, a recent roadshow has sparked another discussion online after...

thatindicmonk's profile picture

Based Monk 📢(#Unreserved)

18,318 subscribers

14,307 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Watch These Three Videos. In the first, the Chief Minister of Assam calls a Congress politician a Gan*u. On camera. In public. Without apology. In the second, teenage girls dance to "Unki maa ka bhos*a" with hip thrusts that mime rape. In the third, a religious procession moves, thousands of men watching while women perform explicitly sexual acts while dancing on a truck (in the name of God). If you think these three things are unrelated, you haven't understood what Hindutva actually is. This is not crudeness. This is not a culture war about manners or etiquettes. This is a deliberate project, the systematic sexualization of Indian political and religious life, where the female body becomes spectacle and territory, where the language of violation becomes the language of faith and victory, where a Chief Minister and a religious procession share the same vocabulary. And it is thought out. I grew up in India, in a Hindu society. I never saw anything like this. This is not what Hinduism is. Whether you like it or not, Hinduism is part of every Indian's life. We grew up on Sunday morning Ramayan at 9 AM. The festivals of Diwali and Holi. The idea that good wins over evil. And so much more. It was simple. It was moral. It was universal. It belonged to all of us, even those of us who weren't Hindu. We had our own religions, our own prayers, but that moral code was shared. It was in the air we breathed. This is what is being hollowed out. Not just a religion, a common inheritance. That Sunday morning feeling. The idea that there is such a thing as good, and that it wins. Hindutva has taken that and replaced it with a truck, thousands of men, and women performing a sexual dance. This is Hindutva's deep perversion. It has taken a civilization's religious life and turned it into a mob spectacle. It has taken its political language and soaked it in rape. It has handed teenage girls a rape anthem and called it a dance. The slur is not a slip. The procession is not spontaneous. The choreography is not innocent. What is being built, across platforms, campaign rallies, and now religious processions is a political vocabulary where your opponent is not defeated but penetrated, where the enemy is not wrong but he is a Gan*u. When language and ritual are both sexualized to this degree, something specific happens to the people inside it: they stop seeing clearly. The violence stops feeling like violence. The degradation stops feeling like degradation. The opponent becomes pest. The procession becomes devotion. The rape joke becomes a rally cry. This is what the normalization is for. The filth is the mechanism. Run it long enough, from the Chief Minister's mouth to the temple truck to the religious procession, and an entire society quietly crosses a threshold it can never name, only feel. This is not Hinduism. This is Hindutva in it's ugliest form. And it's all connected.
0:05

Watch These Three Videos. In the first, the Chief Minister of Assam calls a Congress politician a Gan*u. On camera. In public. Without apology. In the second, teenage girls dance to "Unki maa ka bhos*a" with hip thrusts that mime rape. In the third, a religious procession moves, thousands of men watching while women perform explicitly sexual acts while dancing on a truck (in the name of God). If you think these three things are unrelated, you haven't understood what Hindutva actually is. This is not crudeness. This is not a culture war about manners or etiquettes. This is a deliberate project, the systematic sexualization of Indian political and religious life, where the female body becomes spectacle and territory, where the language of violation becomes the language of faith and victory, where a Chief Minister and a religious procession share the same vocabulary. And it is thought out. I grew up in India, in a Hindu society. I never saw anything like this. This is not what Hinduism is. Whether you like it or not, Hinduism is part of every Indian's life. We grew up on Sunday morning Ramayan at 9 AM. The festivals of Diwali and Holi. The idea that good wins over evil. And so much more. It was simple. It was moral. It was universal. It belonged to all of us, even those of us who weren't Hindu. We had our own religions, our own prayers, but that moral code was shared. It was in the air we breathed. This is what is being hollowed out. Not just a religion, a common inheritance. That Sunday morning feeling. The idea that there is such a thing as good, and that it wins. Hindutva has taken that and replaced it with a truck, thousands of men, and women performing a sexual dance. This is Hindutva's deep perversion. It has taken a civilization's religious life and turned it into a mob spectacle. It has taken its political language and soaked it in rape. It has handed teenage girls a rape anthem and called it a dance. The slur is not a slip. The procession is not spontaneous. The choreography is not innocent. What is being built, across platforms, campaign rallies, and now religious processions is a political vocabulary where your opponent is not defeated but penetrated, where the enemy is not wrong but he is a Gan*u. When language and ritual are both sexualized to this degree, something specific happens to the people inside it: they stop seeing clearly. The violence stops feeling like violence. The degradation stops feeling like degradation. The opponent becomes pest. The procession becomes devotion. The rape joke becomes a rally cry. This is what the normalization is for. The filth is the mechanism. Run it long enough, from the Chief Minister's mouth to the temple truck to the religious procession, and an entire society quietly crosses a threshold it can never name, only feel. This is not Hinduism. This is Hindutva in it's ugliest form. And it's all connected.

Darab Farooqui

37,260 views • 4 months ago

Meet Ananya She is saying she dated a few Muslim men and realized the reality of conversion. Now she is trying to spread awareness about it among Hindu girls. She also says Hindu girls who marry Muslim men shouldn't convert. This is how women with freedom always end up destroying Dharma. Why will a Hindu woman who has married or dated outside still be considered a Hindu? Hindu women can date or marry whoever they want, but these women shouldn't remain associated with Hinduism and our culture afterward. Dharma is passed down by men. Gotra, Upnaam is passed by men. Women simply perform puja in the environment created by Hindu men. The temples are built by men, the priests and acharyas are men, the idol makers, sculptors, farmers, merchants, manufacturers, temple builders, and architects, all are men. Dharma belongs to men in every religious community. So what's with these women dating outside and still larping with the customs of Hindu men for views?
0:14

Meet Ananya She is saying she dated a few Muslim men and realized the reality of conversion. Now she is trying to spread awareness about it among Hindu girls. She also says Hindu girls who marry Muslim men shouldn't convert. This is how women with freedom always end up destroying Dharma. Why will a Hindu woman who has married or dated outside still be considered a Hindu? Hindu women can date or marry whoever they want, but these women shouldn't remain associated with Hinduism and our culture afterward. Dharma is passed down by men. Gotra, Upnaam is passed by men. Women simply perform puja in the environment created by Hindu men. The temples are built by men, the priests and acharyas are men, the idol makers, sculptors, farmers, merchants, manufacturers, temple builders, and architects, all are men. Dharma belongs to men in every religious community. So what's with these women dating outside and still larping with the customs of Hindu men for views?

Breaking Beta

79,400 views • 1 month ago

These two nincompoops, Elisha Virmani of The Wire and Kabiran, making a mockery of Electric Bus initiative of Delhi are completely unaware of DEVi. The Delhi Electric Vehicle Interconnector (DEVi) initiative is a major public transport project introduced in 2025 to boost last-mile connectivity with electric buses in the city. As of late 2025, the fleet has expanded to over 900 buses, but the only thing that has not expanded is The Wire’s knowledge who makes fun because it carries a Hindu name, DEVi… Their Hindu hatred is so much visible that they then show a radical Maulvi who preaches hate for other religions is used in their video. This Hindu hatred is the reason why The Wire has never attained credibility, despite being operational since many years, and they largely depend on donations to survive.
0:12

These two nincompoops, Elisha Virmani of The Wire and Kabiran, making a mockery of Electric Bus initiative of Delhi are completely unaware of DEVi. The Delhi Electric Vehicle Interconnector (DEVi) initiative is a major public transport project introduced in 2025 to boost last-mile connectivity with electric buses in the city. As of late 2025, the fleet has expanded to over 900 buses, but the only thing that has not expanded is The Wire’s knowledge who makes fun because it carries a Hindu name, DEVi… Their Hindu hatred is so much visible that they then show a radical Maulvi who preaches hate for other religions is used in their video. This Hindu hatred is the reason why The Wire has never attained credibility, despite being operational since many years, and they largely depend on donations to survive.

Media Expose

12,282 views • 7 months ago

Indore Shocker: Muslim Man Posing as Hindu Caught in Obscene Act, Videos with Multiple Hindu Women Uncovered Kushal Khan, who works at a cloth shop, posed as Kushal Prajapati and befriended a Hindu girl from another shop. People caught him committing an obscene act with the girl, and when Hindu organizations intervened, they found videos of Khan with several Hindu girls and women. Khan has been arrested by the police, and an investigation is underway. But blaming the boy here is not enough, but it's concerned to see what Hindu parents are teaching their daughters.
0:53

Sensitive content

Indore Shocker: Muslim Man Posing as Hindu Caught in Obscene Act, Videos with Multiple Hindu Women Uncovered Kushal Khan, who works at a cloth shop, posed as Kushal Prajapati and befriended a Hindu girl from another shop. People caught him committing an obscene act with the girl, and when Hindu organizations intervened, they found videos of Khan with several Hindu girls and women. Khan has been arrested by the police, and an investigation is underway. But blaming the boy here is not enough, but it's concerned to see what Hindu parents are teaching their daughters.

Treeni

31,258 views • 1 year ago

When History Warns Us, We Must Not Ignore It We never expected the Chief Minister of Keralam to take such a position under any circumstances. But on this issue, we need to look back at history. Because the people of Keralam have every right to ask: whose political pressure is behind this decision of the Chief Minister? When we examine the history of Vande Mataram, one thing becomes clear. This is not a political issue that emerged yesterday. During India’s freedom struggle, Vande Mataram became a symbol of national consciousness and the spirit of freedom for millions of Indians. The Muslim League was formed in 1906. During the 1930s, opposition to certain portions of Vande Mataram became increasingly prominent among sections of Muslim political leadership, including the Muslim League. In 1937, the Congress moved towards adopting the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram for official occasions. This remains an important episode in our history. But one thing must be made absolutely clear. This is not an allegation against the Muslim community. Many Muslims participated wholeheartedly in India’s freedom struggle and sang Vande Mataram as part of the national movement. Therefore, today’s debate is not against any religion. It is a debate about political positions concerning nationalism. But history also raises another important question. In 1937, political opposition emerged over the use of Vande Mataram. Subsequently, the politics demanding the partition of India became stronger, and ultimately, in 1947, the country was divided. That is why, when in 2026 a position is being taken in Keralam that Vande Mataram need not be sung, a natural question arises: Where will such political compromises take us? What will the state of Keralam’s national consciousness be ten years from now? If we begin making political compromises over one national symbol today, what will prevent similar compromises on other national symbols tomorrow? That is the question Keralam needs to debate today. We have even witnessed situations where a teacher faced serious consequences merely because a question about Veer Savarkar was included in a quiz competition. When a historical figure, an idea, or a national song becomes subject to political pressure, it should concern every democratic society. That is why the BJP is bringing Muhammad Ali Jinnah into this discussion today. This is not a discussion about one individual. It is not a discussion about one religion. Nor is it a discussion against any community. It is a discussion about the future of nationalism. If we want to ensure that history does not repeat itself, we must learn from history. Those who say today that Vande Mataram need not be sung—who can guarantee that tomorrow they will not question another national symbol? If we continue surrendering our national values to political pressure, what we ultimately stand to lose will not merely be the words of a song—it will be our sense of national unity. Therefore, our message to the Chief Minister of Keralam is very clear: Do not surrender nationalism to political pressure. No one needs anyone’s permission to sing Vande Mataram in Keralam. Every Indian has the right to embrace this national song, which inspired the freedom struggle of our country. Even if you do not sing it, Keralam will sing it. Even if you exclude it from government programmes, the BJP will ensure that Vande Mataram and the National Anthem are sung across Keralam. Because the Bharatiya Janata Party will stand at the forefront to protect the national consciousness of this land. As long as Narendra Modi leads this country, we will not allow politics opposed to India’s unity and integrity to take root on this soil. There will be no compromise on nationalism in Keralam. When history warns us, we must not ignore it. We must learn from history. We must not allow history to repeat itself. My greetings and congratulations to the Yuva Morcha for organising this programme.
0:11

When History Warns Us, We Must Not Ignore It We never expected the Chief Minister of Keralam to take such a position under any circumstances. But on this issue, we need to look back at history. Because the people of Keralam have every right to ask: whose political pressure is behind this decision of the Chief Minister? When we examine the history of Vande Mataram, one thing becomes clear. This is not a political issue that emerged yesterday. During India’s freedom struggle, Vande Mataram became a symbol of national consciousness and the spirit of freedom for millions of Indians. The Muslim League was formed in 1906. During the 1930s, opposition to certain portions of Vande Mataram became increasingly prominent among sections of Muslim political leadership, including the Muslim League. In 1937, the Congress moved towards adopting the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram for official occasions. This remains an important episode in our history. But one thing must be made absolutely clear. This is not an allegation against the Muslim community. Many Muslims participated wholeheartedly in India’s freedom struggle and sang Vande Mataram as part of the national movement. Therefore, today’s debate is not against any religion. It is a debate about political positions concerning nationalism. But history also raises another important question. In 1937, political opposition emerged over the use of Vande Mataram. Subsequently, the politics demanding the partition of India became stronger, and ultimately, in 1947, the country was divided. That is why, when in 2026 a position is being taken in Keralam that Vande Mataram need not be sung, a natural question arises: Where will such political compromises take us? What will the state of Keralam’s national consciousness be ten years from now? If we begin making political compromises over one national symbol today, what will prevent similar compromises on other national symbols tomorrow? That is the question Keralam needs to debate today. We have even witnessed situations where a teacher faced serious consequences merely because a question about Veer Savarkar was included in a quiz competition. When a historical figure, an idea, or a national song becomes subject to political pressure, it should concern every democratic society. That is why the BJP is bringing Muhammad Ali Jinnah into this discussion today. This is not a discussion about one individual. It is not a discussion about one religion. Nor is it a discussion against any community. It is a discussion about the future of nationalism. If we want to ensure that history does not repeat itself, we must learn from history. Those who say today that Vande Mataram need not be sung—who can guarantee that tomorrow they will not question another national symbol? If we continue surrendering our national values to political pressure, what we ultimately stand to lose will not merely be the words of a song—it will be our sense of national unity. Therefore, our message to the Chief Minister of Keralam is very clear: Do not surrender nationalism to political pressure. No one needs anyone’s permission to sing Vande Mataram in Keralam. Every Indian has the right to embrace this national song, which inspired the freedom struggle of our country. Even if you do not sing it, Keralam will sing it. Even if you exclude it from government programmes, the BJP will ensure that Vande Mataram and the National Anthem are sung across Keralam. Because the Bharatiya Janata Party will stand at the forefront to protect the national consciousness of this land. As long as Narendra Modi leads this country, we will not allow politics opposed to India’s unity and integrity to take root on this soil. There will be no compromise on nationalism in Keralam. When history warns us, we must not ignore it. We must learn from history. We must not allow history to repeat itself. My greetings and congratulations to the Yuva Morcha for organising this programme.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar 🇮🇳

13,916 views • 11 days ago

The blatant call to eradicate #SanathanaDharma by Thiru.V.M.S.Mustafa, Tamil Nadu Muslim League founder and MLA of CM Vijay’s party -TVK is absolutely outrageous and highly condemnable. Is this your brand of secularism? Hiding behind a secular mask only to launch targeted attacks on Hindu beliefs completely exposes your true colours. The DMK has practiced this exact same anti-Hindu politics for decades. If your party is continuing the same, what makes you any different from the DMK? Sanatana Dharma is an ancient and eternal way of life that has withstood many attacks. Politicians who try to destroy it will disappear, but no one can ever touch Sanatana. The people of Tamil Nadu will never accept this cheap vote-bank politics built on insulting the Hindu faith!
0:18

The blatant call to eradicate #SanathanaDharma by Thiru.V.M.S.Mustafa, Tamil Nadu Muslim League founder and MLA of CM Vijay’s party -TVK is absolutely outrageous and highly condemnable. Is this your brand of secularism? Hiding behind a secular mask only to launch targeted attacks on Hindu beliefs completely exposes your true colours. The DMK has practiced this exact same anti-Hindu politics for decades. If your party is continuing the same, what makes you any different from the DMK? Sanatana Dharma is an ancient and eternal way of life that has withstood many attacks. Politicians who try to destroy it will disappear, but no one can ever touch Sanatana. The people of Tamil Nadu will never accept this cheap vote-bank politics built on insulting the Hindu faith!

Dr.SG Suryah

44,944 views • 3 months ago

We have said it from day one. BJP is a tangle of poisonous snakes that does not represent the interests of any community. Not Hindus. Not Muslims. No one. And Himanta Biswa Sarma has just proved it himself. Himanta has openly accepted that Hindus, the very community BJP claims to be the custodians and protectors of, form the lion's share of deletions under SIR. And his response to that admission? He called it a "little sacrifice." Was it a little sacrifice when lakhs of Hindu Bengalis were thrown into detention camps in Assam under BJP's watch? Was it a little sacrifice when legitimate Hindu citizens were served NRC notices by Foreigners Tribunals? Was it a little sacrifice when genuine Hindu voters were forced into humiliating queues and then erased from the electoral rolls? Look at these faces. Remember these names. And remember how they betrayed the very people they claimed to protect. Your vote on 29th April is a decision about whether you live on this land with pride and dignity, or face detention and deportation at the hands of those who call your erasure a minor inconvenience. Vote for BJP at your own peril.
0:13

We have said it from day one. BJP is a tangle of poisonous snakes that does not represent the interests of any community. Not Hindus. Not Muslims. No one. And Himanta Biswa Sarma has just proved it himself. Himanta has openly accepted that Hindus, the very community BJP claims to be the custodians and protectors of, form the lion's share of deletions under SIR. And his response to that admission? He called it a "little sacrifice." Was it a little sacrifice when lakhs of Hindu Bengalis were thrown into detention camps in Assam under BJP's watch? Was it a little sacrifice when legitimate Hindu citizens were served NRC notices by Foreigners Tribunals? Was it a little sacrifice when genuine Hindu voters were forced into humiliating queues and then erased from the electoral rolls? Look at these faces. Remember these names. And remember how they betrayed the very people they claimed to protect. Your vote on 29th April is a decision about whether you live on this land with pride and dignity, or face detention and deportation at the hands of those who call your erasure a minor inconvenience. Vote for BJP at your own peril.

All India Trinamool Congress

19,323 views • 4 months ago

Delusional? When Religion Is Mocked for Politics The recent remarks made by the U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth are deeply inflammatory and deserving of serious criticism. While addressing Iran’s nuclear issue, he referred to Islamic prophecies as “delusional.” Such language is not only disrespectful to millions of Muslims worldwide, but it also dangerously shifts what is presented as a political and strategic matter into the realm of religious confrontation. If the U.S. position toward Iran is truly grounded in national security and geopolitical considerations, then invoking and mocking religious beliefs undermines that claim. Introducing theology into a political conflict exposes bias and damages credibility. It sends a troubling signal that the issue is not purely strategic, but ideologically charged. Now compare it with the statement of US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee few weeks ago when in an interview with Tucker Carlson , he expressed that Israel has a divine right to whole of Middle east from the Nile river in Egypt to Euphrates in Iraq, and "it would be fine if they take it all" as it has been promised in Genesis 15 to the descendants of Abraham. One must ask: if someone were to describe those biblical prophecies as “delusional,” would that not immediately be condemned as offensive or even antisemitic? Respect for faith cannot be selective. Even while defining "delusion" in terms of psychiatry, they exclude religious beliefs. Transforming a geopolitical conflict into a theological or ideological struggle is reckless and dangerous. It deepens divisions, fuels resentment, and risks escalating tensions far beyond diplomatic or strategic boundaries. Political disputes must remain political; once they are framed as religious battles, the consequences become far more volatile. Such statements deserve clear condemnation from Muslim leaders and from all those who believe in equal respect for religious traditions. Making a political war theological and ideological is dangerous and it shows how the 350 million Americans have been told a lie that it is a war for their security. --------------------------------------------------- Ryan Grim Mehdi Hasan Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani Murtaza Hussain Moeed Pirzada
1:30

Delusional? When Religion Is Mocked for Politics The recent remarks made by the U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth are deeply inflammatory and deserving of serious criticism. While addressing Iran’s nuclear issue, he referred to Islamic prophecies as “delusional.” Such language is not only disrespectful to millions of Muslims worldwide, but it also dangerously shifts what is presented as a political and strategic matter into the realm of religious confrontation. If the U.S. position toward Iran is truly grounded in national security and geopolitical considerations, then invoking and mocking religious beliefs undermines that claim. Introducing theology into a political conflict exposes bias and damages credibility. It sends a troubling signal that the issue is not purely strategic, but ideologically charged. Now compare it with the statement of US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee few weeks ago when in an interview with Tucker Carlson , he expressed that Israel has a divine right to whole of Middle east from the Nile river in Egypt to Euphrates in Iraq, and "it would be fine if they take it all" as it has been promised in Genesis 15 to the descendants of Abraham. One must ask: if someone were to describe those biblical prophecies as “delusional,” would that not immediately be condemned as offensive or even antisemitic? Respect for faith cannot be selective. Even while defining "delusion" in terms of psychiatry, they exclude religious beliefs. Transforming a geopolitical conflict into a theological or ideological struggle is reckless and dangerous. It deepens divisions, fuels resentment, and risks escalating tensions far beyond diplomatic or strategic boundaries. Political disputes must remain political; once they are framed as religious battles, the consequences become far more volatile. Such statements deserve clear condemnation from Muslim leaders and from all those who believe in equal respect for religious traditions. Making a political war theological and ideological is dangerous and it shows how the 350 million Americans have been told a lie that it is a war for their security. --------------------------------------------------- Ryan Grim Mehdi Hasan Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani Murtaza Hussain Moeed Pirzada

Dr Waqas Nawaz

11,357 views • 5 months ago

There is a beautiful belief about swans. 🦢 When a swan chooses its mate, it stays with them for the rest of its life. They may be separated by distance, time, or the cruel turns of life… But once the heart has chosen, it does not search for another. Perhaps that is why swans have become one of the most beautiful symbols of love: “True love is choosing the same person, again and again, for a lifetime.” 🤍
0:10

There is a beautiful belief about swans. 🦢 When a swan chooses its mate, it stays with them for the rest of its life. They may be separated by distance, time, or the cruel turns of life… But once the heart has chosen, it does not search for another. Perhaps that is why swans have become one of the most beautiful symbols of love: “True love is choosing the same person, again and again, for a lifetime.” 🤍

Knight World

60,032 views • 11 days ago

They started with 50. Now they say they’re 18,000 In 1996 there were fewer than 50 of them. Today, according to the organizers, up to 18,000 walked through Copenhagen. From Dronning Louises Bro to the Imam Ali Mosque. Look at the curve. This is how it happens. First a handful. Then a few hundred. Then it fills a bridge, a district, a capital. A little at a time, until it is no longer a little. And let me be fair, because fairness is the point. There is nothing strange about them holding this mourning procession. They have done it as part of their faith for more than a thousand years. It is theirs, and they believe in it. There is nothing strange about that at all. What should stop us is the other half. There is nothing strange about Europe allowing it either, and that is exactly the problem. Europe allows it because Europe has forgotten who it is. A people that remembers what it stands for does not need to ban anything, it simply knows where its own line runs. We have lost that. And so the issue was never them. The issue is us. Now look at what actually moved through the streets. Men in front. Women in the second row. That is not a detail, that is the whole point. It is a view of women set into a system and marched out into the public square, in a city where generations fought for women and men to stand as equals. The real question is not whether people may believe what they want. They may. The question is why our capital should cultivate a political law-religion that commemorates a 7th-century power struggle by dividing people by sex on Nørrebrogade. One of the organizers is the Imam Ali Mosque, repeatedly described as the Iranian regime’s extended arm in Denmark. The same regime that hangs women and young men from cranes. We are not importing culture. We are importing a system. And we let it grow, not because they are strong, but because we forgot why we were. First a little. Then a lot. Then too late.
0:10

They started with 50. Now they say they’re 18,000 In 1996 there were fewer than 50 of them. Today, according to the organizers, up to 18,000 walked through Copenhagen. From Dronning Louises Bro to the Imam Ali Mosque. Look at the curve. This is how it happens. First a handful. Then a few hundred. Then it fills a bridge, a district, a capital. A little at a time, until it is no longer a little. And let me be fair, because fairness is the point. There is nothing strange about them holding this mourning procession. They have done it as part of their faith for more than a thousand years. It is theirs, and they believe in it. There is nothing strange about that at all. What should stop us is the other half. There is nothing strange about Europe allowing it either, and that is exactly the problem. Europe allows it because Europe has forgotten who it is. A people that remembers what it stands for does not need to ban anything, it simply knows where its own line runs. We have lost that. And so the issue was never them. The issue is us. Now look at what actually moved through the streets. Men in front. Women in the second row. That is not a detail, that is the whole point. It is a view of women set into a system and marched out into the public square, in a city where generations fought for women and men to stand as equals. The real question is not whether people may believe what they want. They may. The question is why our capital should cultivate a political law-religion that commemorates a 7th-century power struggle by dividing people by sex on Nørrebrogade. One of the organizers is the Imam Ali Mosque, repeatedly described as the Iranian regime’s extended arm in Denmark. The same regime that hangs women and young men from cranes. We are not importing culture. We are importing a system. And we let it grow, not because they are strong, but because we forgot why we were. First a little. Then a lot. Then too late.

Krisztina Maria

38,814 views • 2 months ago

There is a concern that extremists are coming to power in West Bengal, and there is a kind of apprehension about what the relationship and border situation with Bangladesh will look like in the coming days. :-Asif Mahmud (an anti-Hindu adviser to Yunus) who called for a boycott of India in cricket & suggested not sending the BD 🇧🇩 team to the World Cup.
0:12

There is a concern that extremists are coming to power in West Bengal, and there is a kind of apprehension about what the relationship and border situation with Bangladesh will look like in the coming days. :-Asif Mahmud (an anti-Hindu adviser to Yunus) who called for a boycott of India in cricket & suggested not sending the BD 🇧🇩 team to the World Cup.

Voice Of BD Hindus 🇧🇩

33,977 views • 3 months ago

Today a group of Muslims prayed next to the Ministry of Defence, facing the Iraq and Afghanistan memorial. As I have said before, choosing to pray in this way in public is a political act. It is a social statement and, yes, it is an act of domination. Anybody who understands Islamism understands that the domination of public spaces is part of the modus operandi. It is done so Islamists can show who is in charge - and to show other Muslims and the wider public that the authorities will bend to their will. There is quite obviously no need to pray here. The decision to do so is symbolic and pointed. It is not welcome. We have freedom of religion in this country, which is why there are mosques. But we are not a Muslim country and this is not welcome. It should be stopped.
0:10

Today a group of Muslims prayed next to the Ministry of Defence, facing the Iraq and Afghanistan memorial. As I have said before, choosing to pray in this way in public is a political act. It is a social statement and, yes, it is an act of domination. Anybody who understands Islamism understands that the domination of public spaces is part of the modus operandi. It is done so Islamists can show who is in charge - and to show other Muslims and the wider public that the authorities will bend to their will. There is quite obviously no need to pray here. The decision to do so is symbolic and pointed. It is not welcome. We have freedom of religion in this country, which is why there are mosques. But we are not a Muslim country and this is not welcome. It should be stopped.

Nick Timothy MP

1,477,674 views • 2 months ago

Since when did Varmala become a Pakistani thing? This is a video of Pakistani wedding, Pakistani Cricketer Imad Wasim marries his rumoured girlfriend Nyla Rajah. Here you won't find any Burqa or Parda as they generally do in their culture. They are holding Varmala which has been part of Hindu culture, anything which aesthetically looks good is now being copied by these Pakis and being labelled as "South Asian" Everything which they hated or called "Too hindu" is now being adopted by them. The problem is not why they are copying us, the problem is about Hypocrisy. Culture so goated that even people who hate you Copy it 🔥
0:11

Since when did Varmala become a Pakistani thing? This is a video of Pakistani wedding, Pakistani Cricketer Imad Wasim marries his rumoured girlfriend Nyla Rajah. Here you won't find any Burqa or Parda as they generally do in their culture. They are holding Varmala which has been part of Hindu culture, anything which aesthetically looks good is now being copied by these Pakis and being labelled as "South Asian" Everything which they hated or called "Too hindu" is now being adopted by them. The problem is not why they are copying us, the problem is about Hypocrisy. Culture so goated that even people who hate you Copy it 🔥

Chota Don

574,304 views • 6 months ago

Barkha interviewed Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 in 2014 when she gained attention as the only Hindu in US Congress. After hearing about her faith, Barkha asked, "Is this the religion you plan to 'stay with'?" Tulsi calmly replied, "This is the motivation for my life and all that I do, and it is the only way of life for me." But what kind of question was that? Barkha wouldn't have dared ask this to anyone of another religion.
0:15

Barkha interviewed Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 in 2014 when she gained attention as the only Hindu in US Congress. After hearing about her faith, Barkha asked, "Is this the religion you plan to 'stay with'?" Tulsi calmly replied, "This is the motivation for my life and all that I do, and it is the only way of life for me." But what kind of question was that? Barkha wouldn't have dared ask this to anyone of another religion.

THE SKIN DOCTOR

640,591 views • 1 year ago

Agitation in Pune by Hindu Janajagruti Samiti ! Ban Maharaj Film for defaming Hindu saints and sects. - 🚩 Ramesh Shinde 🇮🇳 Even earlier, Aamir Khan's film ‘PK’ had shown derogatory scenes and offensive dialogues about Lord Shiva, depicting Hindu saints as gangsters. Now, his son is perpetuating this narrative in the movie #Maharaj. By referencing an incident from British rule 150 years ago, the film creates a false image of Sadhus and the Vallabh Sampradaya. This film appears to be part of a nationwide conspiracy to defame saints and the Vallabh sect. HJS also demands the implementation of an 'anti-blasphemy law' across the country to prevent the insult of deities, religion, and saints.
0:25

Agitation in Pune by Hindu Janajagruti Samiti ! Ban Maharaj Film for defaming Hindu saints and sects. - 🚩 Ramesh Shinde 🇮🇳 Even earlier, Aamir Khan's film ‘PK’ had shown derogatory scenes and offensive dialogues about Lord Shiva, depicting Hindu saints as gangsters. Now, his son is perpetuating this narrative in the movie #Maharaj. By referencing an incident from British rule 150 years ago, the film creates a false image of Sadhus and the Vallabh Sampradaya. This film appears to be part of a nationwide conspiracy to defame saints and the Vallabh sect. HJS also demands the implementation of an 'anti-blasphemy law' across the country to prevent the insult of deities, religion, and saints.

HinduJagrutiOrg

12,081 views • 2 years ago

I strongly condemn the brutal and unjustified lathi charge on our Hindu brothers who were peacefully protesting at the sacred Matha Muthyallamma Temple in Secunderabad. It is deeply disturbing that when our religious sentiments are attacked and idols desecrated, we are not even allowed to raise our voices in a peaceful manner. The real question is: who ordered this lathi charge? Those responsible for desecrating the temple should be facing action, not the devotees who seek justice. Why is it that Hindus are always taken for granted? This is a clear example of the Congress party's appeasement politics, where the concerns of the majority are consistently ignored. We demand accountability and justice for this attack on our faith, and we will not be silenced.
1:22

I strongly condemn the brutal and unjustified lathi charge on our Hindu brothers who were peacefully protesting at the sacred Matha Muthyallamma Temple in Secunderabad. It is deeply disturbing that when our religious sentiments are attacked and idols desecrated, we are not even allowed to raise our voices in a peaceful manner. The real question is: who ordered this lathi charge? Those responsible for desecrating the temple should be facing action, not the devotees who seek justice. Why is it that Hindus are always taken for granted? This is a clear example of the Congress party's appeasement politics, where the concerns of the majority are consistently ignored. We demand accountability and justice for this attack on our faith, and we will not be silenced.

Raja Singh

380,633 views • 1 year ago

🤨 “Gaza Is The ONLY Issue That Matters” Yasmin Alibhai-Brown has once again shown just how detached some public voices have become from the reality facing ordinary people in Britain. During a debate about Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s listening tour and the urgent questions of what he can and should do about the cost of living crisis and the many other huge problems crushing this country, she declared: “I know Andy and I like him but I still won’t vote for him because the ONLY issue that matters to me is what’s he’s going to do on Gaza and he hasn’t answered that.” Not the NHS. Not housing. Not energy bills. Not crime. Not immigration. Not the state of the economy. Just Gaza. This is not principled. It is obsessive. It is a textbook example of someone elevating a distant conflict, however tragic, above the actual, immediate suffering of the people who live here and pay the taxes that keep the lights on. How many more voices like this are there, treating Britain as an afterthought while demanding politicians prioritise foreign policy litmus tests over which they have almost no real control?”​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ When your own country is struggling with stagnant wages, broken public services and a genuine cost of living emergency, announcing that none of it counts unless the politician says the right words about Gaza is just insane to me. You can care about Gaza. Plenty of people do. But when you openly say it is the only thing that matters, and you would reject someone you otherwise like purely on that basis while ignoring everything else, you have stopped talking about politics and started performing purity. And that performance is coming at the expense of the country you actually live in.
0:12

🤨 “Gaza Is The ONLY Issue That Matters” Yasmin Alibhai-Brown has once again shown just how detached some public voices have become from the reality facing ordinary people in Britain. During a debate about Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s listening tour and the urgent questions of what he can and should do about the cost of living crisis and the many other huge problems crushing this country, she declared: “I know Andy and I like him but I still won’t vote for him because the ONLY issue that matters to me is what’s he’s going to do on Gaza and he hasn’t answered that.” Not the NHS. Not housing. Not energy bills. Not crime. Not immigration. Not the state of the economy. Just Gaza. This is not principled. It is obsessive. It is a textbook example of someone elevating a distant conflict, however tragic, above the actual, immediate suffering of the people who live here and pay the taxes that keep the lights on. How many more voices like this are there, treating Britain as an afterthought while demanding politicians prioritise foreign policy litmus tests over which they have almost no real control?”​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ When your own country is struggling with stagnant wages, broken public services and a genuine cost of living emergency, announcing that none of it counts unless the politician says the right words about Gaza is just insane to me. You can care about Gaza. Plenty of people do. But when you openly say it is the only thing that matters, and you would reject someone you otherwise like purely on that basis while ignoring everything else, you have stopped talking about politics and started performing purity. And that performance is coming at the expense of the country you actually live in.

J Stewart

66,722 views • 18 days ago

The problem for the gatekeepers is not that civilization has previously collapsed because of an event. The real problem is that the event is cyclical... If it were a once-in-a-million-years meteor impact that caused a reset, they would have said so. But it is not. It is the Geophysical Event... They will never confirm the event because of “national security.” They need you to keep working and grinding as if everything is going to be okay until things become unbearable. Then they will retreat into their bunkers, and you will be left alone...
0:14

The problem for the gatekeepers is not that civilization has previously collapsed because of an event. The real problem is that the event is cyclical... If it were a once-in-a-million-years meteor impact that caused a reset, they would have said so. But it is not. It is the Geophysical Event... They will never confirm the event because of “national security.” They need you to keep working and grinding as if everything is going to be okay until things become unbearable. Then they will retreat into their bunkers, and you will be left alone...

Open Minded Approach

35,982 views • 3 days ago

Due to casteism, Hindus have begun throwing out the photos and statues of great Hindu men from their homes. This is a video from yesterday in which a Dalit man throws out the photo of a Hindu God by placing his shoes on it. He says that if these people do not allow us to enter the temple, then we will not keep their gods and goddesses in our homes. #Nomore_casteism #Hindutva_terror
0:19

Due to casteism, Hindus have begun throwing out the photos and statues of great Hindu men from their homes. This is a video from yesterday in which a Dalit man throws out the photo of a Hindu God by placing his shoes on it. He says that if these people do not allow us to enter the temple, then we will not keep their gods and goddesses in our homes. #Nomore_casteism #Hindutva_terror

𝝗𝙤⃪✘𝝴𝙧⃪ ❁

31,687 views • 2 years ago

LOOK AT THESE STUDENTS…THESE ARE THE KIDS OUR TAX DOLLARS ARE PAYING FOR. WHAT DO YOU NOTICE???? Story ⤵️ At Stockton High School in California, teenagers walked out to protest ICE deportations, chanting slogans and waving signs as cameras rolled. Supporters called it bravery. But critics saw something else…not spontaneous student activism, but the predictable result of years of one-sided political messaging inside classrooms. For many on the right, this wasn’t just about immigration. It was about authority, borders, and whether public schools are educating…or indoctrinating. They argue that immigration enforcement is federal law, not oppression. That national borders aren’t “optional.” That schools should teach civics, not cultivate protest culture. They point out a simple reality: ICE exists because immigration laws exist. If laws passed by Congress are framed as immoral by default, what message does that send to the next generation about the rule of law itself? This wasn’t just a walkout. It was a flashpoint in a country already divided over sovereignty, security, and national identity. Should public schools be encouraging this kind of political activism…or should they be focused on teaching respect for the law and the Constitution?
0:16

LOOK AT THESE STUDENTS…THESE ARE THE KIDS OUR TAX DOLLARS ARE PAYING FOR. WHAT DO YOU NOTICE???? Story ⤵️ At Stockton High School in California, teenagers walked out to protest ICE deportations, chanting slogans and waving signs as cameras rolled. Supporters called it bravery. But critics saw something else…not spontaneous student activism, but the predictable result of years of one-sided political messaging inside classrooms. For many on the right, this wasn’t just about immigration. It was about authority, borders, and whether public schools are educating…or indoctrinating. They argue that immigration enforcement is federal law, not oppression. That national borders aren’t “optional.” That schools should teach civics, not cultivate protest culture. They point out a simple reality: ICE exists because immigration laws exist. If laws passed by Congress are framed as immoral by default, what message does that send to the next generation about the rule of law itself? This wasn’t just a walkout. It was a flashpoint in a country already divided over sovereignty, security, and national identity. Should public schools be encouraging this kind of political activism…or should they be focused on teaching respect for the law and the Constitution?

𝐌𝐑. 𝐖𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐄 ™

19,013 views • 6 months ago