正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

When she “wasn’t using her voice”. #MeghanMarkle is insufferable. So she decisively wore things to promote female owned small businesses? When? Because going thru the archives in 2018-2020 she wore jewelry by estavlblushes jewelers and designers clothes & shoes. Burberry, Altuzarra, Givenchy, Dior, Alexander Wang, Ralph Lauren, Carolina Herrera,...

25,310 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The Extraordinary Grandiosity of Meghan Markle. The disconnect in this interview is astonishing. Meghan says she already had influence during her time on Suits. She talks about people monetising what she wore and how intentional she was in using fashion to elevate brands and designers, almost presenting herself as someone uniquely thoughtful about the opportunities clothing gave her. And somehow, throughout all of it, there is barely any acknowledgement that marrying into one of the most famous institutions in the world might have had something to do with the level of attention she received. Instead, the story becomes: Meghan had the influence. Meghan elevated brands. People monetised Meghan. Meghan used fashion strategically. Meghan was the phenomenon all along. She genuinely believes the influence was always hers. The sheer narcissism of it is astonishing. The constant rewriting of the narrative so that Meghan is always the benefactor rather than the beneficiary, always the one elevating others rather than the one being elevated, is frankly laughable. Royal women have long understood that what they wear sends a message. They have used fashion to champion homegrown talent, support local businesses on tours and bring attention to causes bigger than themselves. They recognised that the platform wasn’t about them. It was about how they could use it in service of something greater. Meghan, on the other hand, often appeared far more interested in established luxury labels and big fashion houses. Yet listening to this interview, she speaks as though she was the one intentionally elevating others, as though this level of thoughtfulness and strategy began with Meghan Markle. To understand the disconnect, if Meghan Markle already had that level of influence from Suits onwards, where were the sell outs? Which brands couldn’t keep stock because Rachel Zane wore a blouse? Where were the websites dedicated to tracking Meghan Markle’s outfits before she became a working royal? And if the influence truly belonged to her alone, where is that same level of impact today? There seems to be no gratitude for the extraordinary platform she was given. No recognition that she stepped into an institution that amplified everything she touched. Just the conviction that she was the gift. Everything is always about Meghan. The influence was hers. The generosity was hers. The strategy was hers. The impact was hers. It’s an astonishing level of self importance to walk away from one of the biggest platforms in the world genuinely believing that everyone else was benefiting from you, rather than recognising just how much you had benefited from them.

Queen Esther

100,702 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Princess of Wales's £1,340 gorgeous Trouser suit from Victoria Beckham did not just make wave; It sold Out within 24 hours, in every colour and sizes🔥🤩👌 VB restocked but even that sold out. It is also sold out in most stores still holding the suit. Truly that suit was magnificent on her, the tailoring incredible😍 This is the Incredible influence of Catherine known as "The Kate Effect". Every designer knows, If Catherine is wearing it, it is selling out within 24 hours no matter the price; and this is exactly what Harriet Walker, fashion editor for the Times covered in her brilliant article. She wrote: "Her fashion choices boost the economy by £1 billion a year. Yesterday’s look was particularly well picked. Then again, over the almost two decades I have been a fashion journalist, one name has dominated my beat more than any other. How long did I have to wait yesterday for the woman whose influence on the British retail economy is known as “the Kate effect”? Reader, she arrived 15 minutes early. You can’t buy that sort of class."🤩👌 "There is a veritable Kate economy and, in this fiscal microclimate at least, Britain is booming.[...] Whether wearing Burberry, McQueen, Reiss or Whistles (which even named the blouse she wore soon after her engagement in homage), the Princess of Wales is British fashion’s most patriotic shopper and successful export — especially important given the Brexit red tape and potential tariffs the industry is grappling with."🔥 An insider at a luxury label the princess has worn in the past chimed in: "Everything she wears sells out regardless of the price, sometimes before the pictures are even on the internet. I’ve never seen it with anyone else"😍 Harriet then proceeds to list examples of the "Kate effect" impact on the economy: • In 2021 copycat sales of the Princess of Wales’s wardrobe were found to have boosted the British fashion industry by about £1 billion each year since her engagement to Prince William in 2010."🔥 • The princess’s 2011 McQueen wedding dress increased sales at the label by almost a third that year to £42 million, and entered the bridal design pantheon alongside Grace Kelly’s🔥 • Meanwhile, her appearance at the Platinum Jubilee in a yellow Emilia Wickstead coat was estimated to be worth £3.8 million to the brand.👌 • When she wore the British shoe brand Camilla Elphick’s £270 Alicia pumps to a polo match in 2022, not only did they sell out but one client in Dubai bought them in every colour available🤭 •When the princess teamed the brand’s £280 Lucia slingbacks in tan with a purple dress from the British label Safiyaa to last year’s Wimbledon men’s final, she generated £3.6 million in “media exposure” an industry way of quantifying publicity."👌 All this to say that EACH YEAR, Princess Catherine's fashion boost the UK economy by £1 Billion. That is not including the Money she makes to photographers, magazines and papers selling her pictures. When you understand how many millions of Pound Catherine generates just by appearing, you understand why the press went bonkers in 2024 and viciously attacked Prince William for shielding her from the spotlight. You also understand why they get so upset that she rewears her clothes: A lot of people lose a LOT of Money when they do not see Catherine or when she rewears the same clothes😏 📹Hello Mag

Canellecitadelle

384,140 次观看 • 1 年前

Why is it that I’m never there when all the fun things happen at the airport. Most of the time I only see entitled passengers or screaming kids. I would be hilariously entertained if I saw a woman ducking and dodging security while wearing running shoes like she’s was in the NFL. This woman was having an argument with the airline, she felt they were being unreasonable, that was the only explanation she gave. So she jumped behind the counter and said what she needed to say only to be met by security and she gave them a run for their money. Imagine being the guard who took a dive trying to catch her, I bet all his coworkers never let that down. Closest thing I ever seen to this was a teenager who “accidentally” picked up the wrong bag on the floor got up and left. The woman who owned it noticed moments later and saw the girl casually walking with the bag. She took off after her, when she finally caught up to her they left all common sense at the door because the woman started screaming at her and calling her a thief while trying to get the attention of security. The teen kept saying it was her bag. It wasn’t until security got there that they realized she did grab the wrong bag and that hers was kicked under the seat. The odd thing is, her bag looked nothing liked the one she took so it was hard to say if it was intentional because she did after all left her own bag with her stuff in it too. What about you, have you ever seen anything happen at the airport? I must take the boring airlines, I always miss out on the fun incidents.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

3,286,431 次观看 • 28 天前

Lady narrates how she left home dressing all nice going to a friend’s proposal to using rapper to cover herself at Agege. According to the lady, her friend’s fiancée invited her to the proposal because her friend was not aware of the proposal. So she left her house to the park to enter bus from to Agege and from Agege to her destination. She enter a bus like a small bus, she wanted to sit in the front but people were there already so she had to sit on the next sir behind the driver and a young lady with two kids, backing one and lapping the other one who is about 8 years old. 4 Minutes after the journey started she suddenly she felt something warm on her head only to find out that the little boy sitting behind her already vømitted on her head. The driver had to park everyone alighted at their destination and it was just her, the mother and the driver. She just sat there crying that everyone was questioning her if she was robbed or something then she later stood up to go meet a woman across then the woman asked her to go to a store after she explained everything to her then later asked someone to come call her back. The woman described another place for her and when she got there she was crying so everyone was questioning her while some were running from her because of the vömit on her. Then some women gathered around her and cleaned her up. She got herself clothes to cover up and ordered a ride which took her to the destination. All dressed nice without looking like anything just happened. She really went through a lot in one night😧💔

MEDIA BLOG

21,132 次观看 • 3 个月前

Howard Hawks on working with Marilyn Monroe: "Marilyn Monroe was the most frightened little girl who had no confidence in her ability. She was afraid to come on the screen. Very strange girl. And yet she had this strange effect when she was photographed. Nobody dated her, nobody took her out, nobody paid any attention to her. She’d sit on the set with practically nothing on, and a pretty extra girl would walk by and everybody’d whistle. But she got out in front of the camera, and the camera liked her, and all of a sudden she was a great sex symbol. Fortunately, I had her in a couple of the first pictures that she did 'Monkey Business' (1952) and 'Gentlemen Prefer Blondes' (1953), when she wasn’t worried. And also I had Jane Russell’s help in making 'Gentlemen Prefer Blondes'. We had a lot of fun doing the picture, but there were a lot of times when I was ready to give up the ghost. Jane Russell would say, “Look at me—all he wants you to do is such-and-such a thing.” And Marilyn would say to her, “Why didn’t you tell me?” But I had an easy time compared to some of the directors who worked with her afterward. Because after she got very important she became more and more frightened, and she just didn’t want to come out and do a scene. She didn’t think she was good enough to do the things that she did. She was always better in fantastic material, wasn’t she? Like in 'Gentlemen Prefer Blondes'? There wasn’t a real thing about her. Everything was completely unreal. They tried to make her play real parts in a couple of pictures, and the pictures were disasters. 'Gentlemen Prefer Blondes' was the first one where she really went good, and then they had no sense to stick with that." ("Hawks on Hawks", Joseph McBride, 1982) P.S: Remembering Marilyn Monroe on her 100th birthday!

DepressedBergman

170,417 次观看 • 1 个月前