Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Which step sis are you bussing on ? Full video 🔗 below things got sticky when we woke up 👯‍♀️🎀 ⬇️ #onlyfans #stepsis #roleplay #clips4sale #fansly #ebony #fambase #cuck #cuckold

kay kay :/

52,965 subscribers

71,620 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #onlyfans #stepsis #roleplay #clips4sale #fansly #ebony #fambase #cuck #cuckold

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

When learning a new skill, your toddler needs the same things you do: Opportunity. Practice. And an environment in which it’s safe to fail - at least initially - as you work things out. It’s why I love this video, in which mom provides all three in abundance. Would it be easier to feed the dog herself? Sure. But that’s not the path to independence. And when the going gets tough, does she step in and take over? Quite the opposite, actually. She lends a little technical assistance (two hands) and shares the most important message of all: “Don’t give up. You’ve got this.” Finally, when our hero doesn’t quite stick the landing? That’s okay too. No fuss. Just another step closer to mastery. These are the things we all need as learners. What a lucky little guy.

When learning a new skill, your toddler needs the same things you do: Opportunity. Practice. And an environment in which it’s safe to fail - at least initially - as you work things out. It’s why I love this video, in which mom provides all three in abundance. Would it be easier to feed the dog herself? Sure. But that’s not the path to independence. And when the going gets tough, does she step in and take over? Quite the opposite, actually. She lends a little technical assistance (two hands) and shares the most important message of all: “Don’t give up. You’ve got this.” Finally, when our hero doesn’t quite stick the landing? That’s okay too. No fuss. Just another step closer to mastery. These are the things we all need as learners. What a lucky little guy.

Dan Wuori

30,042 次观看 • 1 年前

He stopped trying to debate them, and that's when things got dangerous. The left thought they could out-argue him, but his secret weapon isn't logic—it's something far more savage. They are desperately trying to scrub this clip, and once you see the mirror he holds up to the movement, you’ll realize why they are so afraid. Watch the full episode on my YT channel! Link is in the comments ⬇️

He stopped trying to debate them, and that's when things got dangerous. The left thought they could out-argue him, but his secret weapon isn't logic—it's something far more savage. They are desperately trying to scrub this clip, and once you see the mirror he holds up to the movement, you’ll realize why they are so afraid. Watch the full episode on my YT channel! Link is in the comments ⬇️

Jillian Michaels

66,413 次观看 • 2 个月前

"You can either produce excellence or you can avoid criticism. But you cannot do both of those. The reason that you don't have certain excellence that you want is because you are afraid of getting criticized. You are afraid of the judgment that comes with it. You are afraid of standing out. You are afraid of being alone. You are afraid of people looking at you. You are worried about what people think of you. There are 2 categories of things in this world: 1) Things that are up to you 2) Things that are not up to you Which category does your reputation sit in? Your reputation is not up to you. I'm the one who associates your reputation with something, not you. You just do things. What's up to you? How you act. Your decisions. Your actions. That is up to you. Your reputation is not up to you. Here's how I know that: You all have a reputation about me and it's not in my control. I get to say and do whatever I say and do up here. I am in control of saying it. I am in control of doing it. The moment words leave my lips, who has control over what is done with those words? You! You are in control of what you think of me. And there's no way everybody in this room is going to think the exact same thing about me. No way. When it comes to exceptional, what we've got to understand is you can spend your whole life trying to avoid criticism and earn reputation, and it still won't be in your control. We can waste a lot of time missing out on excellence we could have been producing if we were just simply LESS trying to engineer what we wanted other people to think about us."

"You can either produce excellence or you can avoid criticism. But you cannot do both of those. The reason that you don't have certain excellence that you want is because you are afraid of getting criticized. You are afraid of the judgment that comes with it. You are afraid of standing out. You are afraid of being alone. You are afraid of people looking at you. You are worried about what people think of you. There are 2 categories of things in this world: 1) Things that are up to you 2) Things that are not up to you Which category does your reputation sit in? Your reputation is not up to you. I'm the one who associates your reputation with something, not you. You just do things. What's up to you? How you act. Your decisions. Your actions. That is up to you. Your reputation is not up to you. Here's how I know that: You all have a reputation about me and it's not in my control. I get to say and do whatever I say and do up here. I am in control of saying it. I am in control of doing it. The moment words leave my lips, who has control over what is done with those words? You! You are in control of what you think of me. And there's no way everybody in this room is going to think the exact same thing about me. No way. When it comes to exceptional, what we've got to understand is you can spend your whole life trying to avoid criticism and earn reputation, and it still won't be in your control. We can waste a lot of time missing out on excellence we could have been producing if we were just simply LESS trying to engineer what we wanted other people to think about us."

Brian Kight

308,878 次观看 • 1 年前

PK had some interesting things to say during his postgame presser after Louisville’s loss to Virginia. And honestly, this might be the first time we’ve heard Pat Kelsey use a cuss word, so you know things are getting serious. “THAT JUST CAN’T HAPPEN,…. Undisciplined Players are coached by Undisciplined Coaches!, it starts with me and it needs to CHANGE…” “Those other guys need to step up, so those other guys aren’t playing 35 mins… the greatest motivator is ASS ON BENCH…. It’s amazing how that motivates…” “We’ve got a lot of things to fix, and I’m one of those crazy people that gets excited about that, I wanna throw up when we lose but let’s freakin go…”

PK had some interesting things to say during his postgame presser after Louisville’s loss to Virginia. And honestly, this might be the first time we’ve heard Pat Kelsey use a cuss word, so you know things are getting serious. “THAT JUST CAN’T HAPPEN,…. Undisciplined Players are coached by Undisciplined Coaches!, it starts with me and it needs to CHANGE…” “Those other guys need to step up, so those other guys aren’t playing 35 mins… the greatest motivator is ASS ON BENCH…. It’s amazing how that motivates…” “We’ve got a lot of things to fix, and I’m one of those crazy people that gets excited about that, I wanna throw up when we lose but let’s freakin go…”

35KYSports

41,491 次观看 • 8 个月前

Trump’s transportation secretary says on CNN that Democrats just BLEW IT on “easy issues” when they refused to stand up — and voters noticed. Jake Tapper had no rebuttal as Sean Duffy handed Democrats a beating for a minute straight. “I think the question becomes, why doesn’t every Democrat stand up and go, ‘No, we want well-qualified drivers on American roads.’ That’s not partisan… I think those are easy issues, Jake. And I don’t think we saw Democrats stand up and support them.” “We got some applause for the U.S. Olympic hockey team, but that was probably one of the only bipartisan moments of the night, which I think is too bad.” “Again, if inflation’s down, Democrats should applaud it. If real incomes are up, Democrats should applaud it. Those are good things that we should support as Americans. “And just because Donald Trump’s in office doesn’t mean you have to sit on your hands. You should applaud that because that’s good for America.”

Trump’s transportation secretary says on CNN that Democrats just BLEW IT on “easy issues” when they refused to stand up — and voters noticed. Jake Tapper had no rebuttal as Sean Duffy handed Democrats a beating for a minute straight. “I think the question becomes, why doesn’t every Democrat stand up and go, ‘No, we want well-qualified drivers on American roads.’ That’s not partisan… I think those are easy issues, Jake. And I don’t think we saw Democrats stand up and support them.” “We got some applause for the U.S. Olympic hockey team, but that was probably one of the only bipartisan moments of the night, which I think is too bad.” “Again, if inflation’s down, Democrats should applaud it. If real incomes are up, Democrats should applaud it. Those are good things that we should support as Americans. “And just because Donald Trump’s in office doesn’t mean you have to sit on your hands. You should applaud that because that’s good for America.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

331,579 次观看 • 6 个月前

🐻 I think so, when dating, getting married and having a child.. I see why they say say man grow up then. My existence takes a step back. If we are the same when dating, I take a step back after we got married and another when the baby was born. Because the things I have to protect change.. 👤 Your son..really.. I saw a photo and he is so handsome~ it's not easy for a baby to look this handsome 👤 Who does he resemble more 🐻 I think he resembles my wife more. He was born at the same time as and recently turned 2years old 👤 It was a time you had to see him grow but you couldn't be there.. you must've done it through video calls 🐻 When there was no filming I'd always go to the postpartum care centers where my wife was at. #HYUNBIN ON ZZANBRO 🫗

🐻 I think so, when dating, getting married and having a child.. I see why they say say man grow up then. My existence takes a step back. If we are the same when dating, I take a step back after we got married and another when the baby was born. Because the things I have to protect change.. 👤 Your son..really.. I saw a photo and he is so handsome~ it's not easy for a baby to look this handsome 👤 Who does he resemble more 🐻 I think he resembles my wife more. He was born at the same time as and recently turned 2years old 👤 It was a time you had to see him grow but you couldn't be there.. you must've done it through video calls 🐻 When there was no filming I'd always go to the postpartum care centers where my wife was at. #HYUNBIN ON ZZANBRO 🫗

🧸ᩚ🥨 #madeinkorea 📺.𖥔 ݁ ˖

163,131 次观看 • 1 年前

“When you chase 5 rabbits, you catch none of them.” 🐇 Doug Lemov broke this down for us, and we can’t unhear it. He stops practice with five coaching points. All five are correct: pass on the ground with pace, receive on your back foot, eyes up, move it side to side, push higher. “Got it? Go.” Working memory holds about one thing at a time. So either the player picks one at random, and now you can’t reinforce anything, because you don’t know which one he picked, or they remember none of it and quietly get good at practicing while ignoring you. You didn’t teach five things. You taught them to tune you out. One rabbit. 🐇

“When you chase 5 rabbits, you catch none of them.” 🐇 Doug Lemov broke this down for us, and we can’t unhear it. He stops practice with five coaching points. All five are correct: pass on the ground with pace, receive on your back foot, eyes up, move it side to side, push higher. “Got it? Go.” Working memory holds about one thing at a time. So either the player picks one at random, and now you can’t reinforce anything, because you don’t know which one he picked, or they remember none of it and quietly get good at practicing while ignoring you. You didn’t teach five things. You taught them to tune you out. One rabbit. 🐇

James Purchin

23,249 次观看 • 10 天前

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "it is absolutely wild that people are talking about the same tired political issues, when we are near the end of the AI exponential" here are three things that should stop you cold: one: at Anthropic, models already do "100% of today's coding tasks" two: a country of geniuses in a datacenter, 90% likely within 10 years three: he won't even buy more compute, because AGI is already this close meanwhile the world is busy with memes, elections, celebrity beef the most important shift of your lifetime is happening quietly, and the gap is already opening the ones who start building with these tools now end up on the other side of it that's exactly why I put together a step-by-step guide on building your own AI agent agents are the part of AI moving fastest right now, the full walkthrough is in the article below

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "it is absolutely wild that people are talking about the same tired political issues, when we are near the end of the AI exponential" here are three things that should stop you cold: one: at Anthropic, models already do "100% of today's coding tasks" two: a country of geniuses in a datacenter, 90% likely within 10 years three: he won't even buy more compute, because AGI is already this close meanwhile the world is busy with memes, elections, celebrity beef the most important shift of your lifetime is happening quietly, and the gap is already opening the ones who start building with these tools now end up on the other side of it that's exactly why I put together a step-by-step guide on building your own AI agent agents are the part of AI moving fastest right now, the full walkthrough is in the article below

Anatoli Kopadze

54,246 次观看 • 3 个月前

Hong Jin kyung’s Gong bu wang Jjin cheonjae (공부왕찐천재) : Lee Soo hyuk mentions GDragon Jinkyung: Are you closest friends with GD? 🧛‍♂️: You know how it is. The longer it’s been, the more it’s like when we see each other often, we see each other a lot, but when we don’t, we don’t even talk on the phone at all, and we don’t really say much. When a conversation does start and it clicks, we end up talking a lot, but when we’re actually face to face, it’s kind of… Since we met when we were just kids who had dreams before either of us debuted, at first we fought a lot. But one day, I realized it Jinkyung: What did you realize? 🧛‍♂️: Ah, my friend… ✨️became a superstar✨️? After I acknowledged that, I honestly became a bit careful around him Jinkyung: Careful about what? 🧛‍♂️: He has his own work and things going on, so when it’s an important moment for him, I tend to step back a bit. I don’t really want to be photographed together that kind of thing. (a feeling of wanting to protect a friend’s time🥹) Jinkyung: Two people who met on the streets in their childhood and became friends one became an actor who’s great at acting, and the other became a musician who defined an era. It’s so nice to see, and when the two of you meet, I feel like there must be a sense of pride too. Like, “Hey, we really did this.” 🧛‍♂️: We can’t really say cringey things like that, and we’re both the type to be snappy with each other, but these days I think we do feel it more. Just the fact that it’s hard for even friendships to last 20 years… I’ve acknowledged it. What can I do? He’s a star Jinkyung: Respect? lol #GDRAGON #지드래곤 #权志龙 #ジヨン #GDRAGON2026 G-DRAGON ⬇️ 🔗

Hong Jin kyung’s Gong bu wang Jjin cheonjae (공부왕찐천재) : Lee Soo hyuk mentions GDragon Jinkyung: Are you closest friends with GD? 🧛‍♂️: You know how it is. The longer it’s been, the more it’s like when we see each other often, we see each other a lot, but when we don’t, we don’t even talk on the phone at all, and we don’t really say much. When a conversation does start and it clicks, we end up talking a lot, but when we’re actually face to face, it’s kind of… Since we met when we were just kids who had dreams before either of us debuted, at first we fought a lot. But one day, I realized it Jinkyung: What did you realize? 🧛‍♂️: Ah, my friend… ✨️became a superstar✨️? After I acknowledged that, I honestly became a bit careful around him Jinkyung: Careful about what? 🧛‍♂️: He has his own work and things going on, so when it’s an important moment for him, I tend to step back a bit. I don’t really want to be photographed together that kind of thing. (a feeling of wanting to protect a friend’s time🥹) Jinkyung: Two people who met on the streets in their childhood and became friends one became an actor who’s great at acting, and the other became a musician who defined an era. It’s so nice to see, and when the two of you meet, I feel like there must be a sense of pride too. Like, “Hey, we really did this.” 🧛‍♂️: We can’t really say cringey things like that, and we’re both the type to be snappy with each other, but these days I think we do feel it more. Just the fact that it’s hard for even friendships to last 20 years… I’ve acknowledged it. What can I do? He’s a star Jinkyung: Respect? lol #GDRAGON #지드래곤 #权志龙 #ジヨン #GDRAGON2026 G-DRAGON ⬇️ 🔗

GDay

51,039 次观看 • 7 个月前

Elon Musk explains his 5-step process for running companies: "First, make your requirements less dumb. Your requirements are definitely dumb. It does not matter who gave them to you. It's particularly dangerous if a smart person gave you the requirements because you might not question them enough. Everyone's wrong no matter who you are. Everyone's wrong some of the time. So make your requirements less dumb. Then try very hard to delete the part or process. This is actually very important. If you're not occasionally adding things back in, you are not deleting enough. The bias tends to be very strongly towards let's add this part or process step in case we need it. But you can basically make in-case arguments for so many things and for a rocket that is trying to be the first fully reusable rocket. There's never been a fully reusable rocket. People don't understand. This is like the holy grail of rocketry. So you've got to delete the part or process step. Super important. You can't hedge your bets. That's why the grid funds, for example, do not fall down because that's a whole extra mechanism that we don't need. Also, whatever requirement or constraint you have, it must come with a name, not a department. Because you can't ask the department. You have to ask a person. That person who's putting forward their requirement or constraint must agree that they must take responsibility for that requirement. Otherwise, you can have a requirement that basically an intern two years ago randomly came up with off the cuff and they're not even at the company anymore. These things are often just way more silly than you think. So step one, make your requirements less dumb. Step two, delete the part or process step. If you're not adding things back in 10% of the time, you're clearly not deleting enough. And then only the third step is simplify or optimize. The third step, not the first step. The reason it's the third step is because possibly the most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. Everyone's been trained in high school and college that you've got to answer the question. Convergent logic. So you can't tell the professor your question is dumb. You'll get a bad grade. You have to answer the question. So everyone's basically, without knowing it, they've got a mental straitjacket on. They'll work on optimizing the thing that should simply not exist. And then finally, you get to step four, which is accelerate cycle time. You're moving too slowly, go faster. But don't go faster until you have worked on the other three things first. You can always make things go faster. And then the final step is automate. Now, I've personally made the mistake of going backwards on all five steps multiple times. Literally, I automated, accelerated, simplified, and then deleted. One example I've talked about before is there were these fiberglass mats on top of the Model 3 battery pack that were in between the floor pan and the battery. And it was at one point choking the battery pack production line. And I was basically living on the battery pack production line trying to fix the line. It was choking the entire Model 3 production program. So the first mistake was I tried to fix the automation, like make the robot better. So automating was a mistake. Then accelerating was a mistake. Then optimizing was a mistake. And finally, I said, what the hell are these mats for? And I asked the battery safety team, what are these mats for? Are they for fire protection or something? They said, no, they're for noise and vibration. Then I asked an NVH, a noise, vibration, harshness team, what's it for? They said fire safety. So literally, it was like being in a Dilbert cartoon. Actually, I feel like I'm in a Dilbert cartoon quite frequently. So then finally, OK, great, let's try a car with the fiberglass mats and without. And they put a microphone to both and see if you can tell the difference. In fact, I was like, which one is which? So we just deleted them and just bypassed this $2 million robot cell. It was just a complete pile of nonsense."

Elon Musk explains his 5-step process for running companies: "First, make your requirements less dumb. Your requirements are definitely dumb. It does not matter who gave them to you. It's particularly dangerous if a smart person gave you the requirements because you might not question them enough. Everyone's wrong no matter who you are. Everyone's wrong some of the time. So make your requirements less dumb. Then try very hard to delete the part or process. This is actually very important. If you're not occasionally adding things back in, you are not deleting enough. The bias tends to be very strongly towards let's add this part or process step in case we need it. But you can basically make in-case arguments for so many things and for a rocket that is trying to be the first fully reusable rocket. There's never been a fully reusable rocket. People don't understand. This is like the holy grail of rocketry. So you've got to delete the part or process step. Super important. You can't hedge your bets. That's why the grid funds, for example, do not fall down because that's a whole extra mechanism that we don't need. Also, whatever requirement or constraint you have, it must come with a name, not a department. Because you can't ask the department. You have to ask a person. That person who's putting forward their requirement or constraint must agree that they must take responsibility for that requirement. Otherwise, you can have a requirement that basically an intern two years ago randomly came up with off the cuff and they're not even at the company anymore. These things are often just way more silly than you think. So step one, make your requirements less dumb. Step two, delete the part or process step. If you're not adding things back in 10% of the time, you're clearly not deleting enough. And then only the third step is simplify or optimize. The third step, not the first step. The reason it's the third step is because possibly the most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. Everyone's been trained in high school and college that you've got to answer the question. Convergent logic. So you can't tell the professor your question is dumb. You'll get a bad grade. You have to answer the question. So everyone's basically, without knowing it, they've got a mental straitjacket on. They'll work on optimizing the thing that should simply not exist. And then finally, you get to step four, which is accelerate cycle time. You're moving too slowly, go faster. But don't go faster until you have worked on the other three things first. You can always make things go faster. And then the final step is automate. Now, I've personally made the mistake of going backwards on all five steps multiple times. Literally, I automated, accelerated, simplified, and then deleted. One example I've talked about before is there were these fiberglass mats on top of the Model 3 battery pack that were in between the floor pan and the battery. And it was at one point choking the battery pack production line. And I was basically living on the battery pack production line trying to fix the line. It was choking the entire Model 3 production program. So the first mistake was I tried to fix the automation, like make the robot better. So automating was a mistake. Then accelerating was a mistake. Then optimizing was a mistake. And finally, I said, what the hell are these mats for? And I asked the battery safety team, what are these mats for? Are they for fire protection or something? They said, no, they're for noise and vibration. Then I asked an NVH, a noise, vibration, harshness team, what's it for? They said fire safety. So literally, it was like being in a Dilbert cartoon. Actually, I feel like I'm in a Dilbert cartoon quite frequently. So then finally, OK, great, let's try a car with the fiberglass mats and without. And they put a microphone to both and see if you can tell the difference. In fact, I was like, which one is which? So we just deleted them and just bypassed this $2 million robot cell. It was just a complete pile of nonsense."

Founder Mode

74,187 次观看 • 5 个月前

I'm open-sourcing the entire ComfyDeploy platform again. Yes, our entire YC company. And we are officially moving on from ComfyUI. The community will decide what's next for ComfyDeploy. Below is an abstract; for more, head to the open source repo below. Existing customers will not be affected; more details are in the repo. The service will continue to run until the last customer remains. For those who are new, ComfyDeploy is a cloud service that deploys ComfyUI, provides a simplified interface, and an API to creative teams. How did we get here? In late 2023, I started ComfyDeploy as an open source project while I was working at my previous company. We had a problem deploying ComfyUI to our production server because of the complexity involved in integrating it into a serverless environment. I posted here about this little project that I was working on as an indie hacker, and it blew up overnight. I woke up to 100k impressions on the post. I put up my cal link, and people started scheduling calls. I had the opportunity to speak with numerous individuals worldwide, including those who reached out to help or potentially utilize ComfyDeploy. We got into YC with ComfyDeploy around 2.5K MRR. Around the same timeframe, ComfyOrg was introduced, Stability collapsed, and Flux just came out. We continued building ComfyDeploy for months, keeping things going. The company was growing, but very slowly. We realized the biggest issue is that we are still really early, and it takes time for businesses and enterprises to really adopt such a niche tool. And we are not ComfyOrg. Meanwhile, closed-source models dropped, and many workflows we knew became no longer useful. Coming from a game developer background, I saw huge potential with ComfyUI at first. Still, I never would have imagined that one giant model could do precisely what you put into words, and you still need workflows to fine-tune and control the exact outputs. ComfyDeploy made it possible for teams to experiment with this. But we were stuck in the middle. First, we are not ComfyOrg; second, closed-source models were doing things way better and slowly eating up the market. As of today, ComfyDeploy is doing $29k MRR, and our last 30 days' revenue was $50k processed. Which is the highest we have ever got, but also the most depressing day I have ever had..... More in the GitHub repo.

I'm open-sourcing the entire ComfyDeploy platform again. Yes, our entire YC company. And we are officially moving on from ComfyUI. The community will decide what's next for ComfyDeploy. Below is an abstract; for more, head to the open source repo below. Existing customers will not be affected; more details are in the repo. The service will continue to run until the last customer remains. For those who are new, ComfyDeploy is a cloud service that deploys ComfyUI, provides a simplified interface, and an API to creative teams. How did we get here? In late 2023, I started ComfyDeploy as an open source project while I was working at my previous company. We had a problem deploying ComfyUI to our production server because of the complexity involved in integrating it into a serverless environment. I posted here about this little project that I was working on as an indie hacker, and it blew up overnight. I woke up to 100k impressions on the post. I put up my cal link, and people started scheduling calls. I had the opportunity to speak with numerous individuals worldwide, including those who reached out to help or potentially utilize ComfyDeploy. We got into YC with ComfyDeploy around 2.5K MRR. Around the same timeframe, ComfyOrg was introduced, Stability collapsed, and Flux just came out. We continued building ComfyDeploy for months, keeping things going. The company was growing, but very slowly. We realized the biggest issue is that we are still really early, and it takes time for businesses and enterprises to really adopt such a niche tool. And we are not ComfyOrg. Meanwhile, closed-source models dropped, and many workflows we knew became no longer useful. Coming from a game developer background, I saw huge potential with ComfyUI at first. Still, I never would have imagined that one giant model could do precisely what you put into words, and you still need workflows to fine-tune and control the exact outputs. ComfyDeploy made it possible for teams to experiment with this. But we were stuck in the middle. First, we are not ComfyOrg; second, closed-source models were doing things way better and slowly eating up the market. As of today, ComfyDeploy is doing $29k MRR, and our last 30 days' revenue was $50k processed. Which is the highest we have ever got, but also the most depressing day I have ever had..... More in the GitHub repo.

BennyKok

147,558 次观看 • 1 年前

What if one of the most important things you can give your children isn't something you buy them? Of course we want our children to be happy, but that doesn't mean we need to always prioritize their comfort. We need to help them become strong enough to handle life when things don't go their way. That doesn't mean raising children who never show emotion or teaching them to toughen up and ignore their feelings. It means teaching them that difficult things can be faced instead of avoided. Let them struggle with age appropriate challenges. Let them make mistakes. Let them experience disappointment. Give them responsibilities and expect them to follow through. Sometimes the easiest thing a parent can do is step in and fix a problem. But if we constantly remove every obstacle from a child's path, how are they ever going to learn how to deal with obstacles on their own? Children need to know that failure isn't the end of the world. They need to learn how to apologize when they're wrong, how to keep going when something is difficult, how to be responsible for their choices, and how to do things for themselves instead of always depending on somebody else. And perhaps most importantly, they need parents who believe they are capable. There is a big difference between protecting a child from every difficulty and preparing a child to face difficulty. The goal isn't to make childhood harder than it needs to be. Childhood should still be full of fun, laughter, encouragement, and love. But eventually those kids will grow up and face a world that won't always be kind or fair. They'll have setbacks, difficult decisions, broken hearts, failures, and responsibilities of their own. We won't always be able to protect them from those things. But we can give them the confidence and character to face them. Are we raising children who simply expect life to be easy, or are we preparing them to be strong when it isn't?

What if one of the most important things you can give your children isn't something you buy them? Of course we want our children to be happy, but that doesn't mean we need to always prioritize their comfort. We need to help them become strong enough to handle life when things don't go their way. That doesn't mean raising children who never show emotion or teaching them to toughen up and ignore their feelings. It means teaching them that difficult things can be faced instead of avoided. Let them struggle with age appropriate challenges. Let them make mistakes. Let them experience disappointment. Give them responsibilities and expect them to follow through. Sometimes the easiest thing a parent can do is step in and fix a problem. But if we constantly remove every obstacle from a child's path, how are they ever going to learn how to deal with obstacles on their own? Children need to know that failure isn't the end of the world. They need to learn how to apologize when they're wrong, how to keep going when something is difficult, how to be responsible for their choices, and how to do things for themselves instead of always depending on somebody else. And perhaps most importantly, they need parents who believe they are capable. There is a big difference between protecting a child from every difficulty and preparing a child to face difficulty. The goal isn't to make childhood harder than it needs to be. Childhood should still be full of fun, laughter, encouragement, and love. But eventually those kids will grow up and face a world that won't always be kind or fair. They'll have setbacks, difficult decisions, broken hearts, failures, and responsibilities of their own. We won't always be able to protect them from those things. But we can give them the confidence and character to face them. Are we raising children who simply expect life to be easy, or are we preparing them to be strong when it isn't?

Declaration of Memes

15,196 次观看 • 1 天前

. Jeremy Boreing asked me how we can help young men find meaning and purpose. Not philosophically…practically. First, I addressed what we are doing wrong. We are not meeting them where they are, on their terms, and until we do that, they won’t be receptive. Gen-Z is not proactively seeking advice, so we have to bring it to them. Second, we need to acknowledge that certain things in their life ARE hard. Too many in the “older” generations are not acknowledging this and simply telling them to “suck it up.” But…we then need to demonstrate to them that life has always been hard and we need to give them that perspective. How do we do this? Make “rites of passage” great again. Getting your driver’s license (I meet so many young people who simply Uber everywhere and thus never got a license). Making the varsity football team (so many young people gave up on sports during Covid). Asking a girl on a date: face-to-face. You become a “legal” adult on your 18th birthday. But you become an actual adult when you acquire enough life experiences that deem you mature enough to BE an adult and these come through rites of passage. Right now we have a generation of young males trying to “learn” manhood from the manosphere which is the definition of immaturity. A “rite of passage” is about triumphing through and beyond something. The manosphere’s business model is to keep young men stuck. It creates followers, not leaders. Perhaps the most important rite of passage we can provide these young men right now is to leave this nonsense and go on with building their lives on their own terms. Young men need the dirt under their fingernails that comes from REAL life experiences, not the calluses on their fingers that come from constant screen swipes.

. Jeremy Boreing asked me how we can help young men find meaning and purpose. Not philosophically…practically. First, I addressed what we are doing wrong. We are not meeting them where they are, on their terms, and until we do that, they won’t be receptive. Gen-Z is not proactively seeking advice, so we have to bring it to them. Second, we need to acknowledge that certain things in their life ARE hard. Too many in the “older” generations are not acknowledging this and simply telling them to “suck it up.” But…we then need to demonstrate to them that life has always been hard and we need to give them that perspective. How do we do this? Make “rites of passage” great again. Getting your driver’s license (I meet so many young people who simply Uber everywhere and thus never got a license). Making the varsity football team (so many young people gave up on sports during Covid). Asking a girl on a date: face-to-face. You become a “legal” adult on your 18th birthday. But you become an actual adult when you acquire enough life experiences that deem you mature enough to BE an adult and these come through rites of passage. Right now we have a generation of young males trying to “learn” manhood from the manosphere which is the definition of immaturity. A “rite of passage” is about triumphing through and beyond something. The manosphere’s business model is to keep young men stuck. It creates followers, not leaders. Perhaps the most important rite of passage we can provide these young men right now is to leave this nonsense and go on with building their lives on their own terms. Young men need the dirt under their fingernails that comes from REAL life experiences, not the calluses on their fingers that come from constant screen swipes.

Gates Garcia

16,776 次观看 • 4 个月前

David david friedberg says we need to close tax loopholes: "Literally everyone's going to hate me over this, but it's the only way." "Any time there's a loophole that lets people transfer one asset for another without paying tax on the gain, because it's called a tax-free transfer, you have to cut all that." "If you don't cut all that, then people are compounding value without paying taxes when they're realizing value along the way." "That's what's unfair about the tax code today. If you invest in a company, a startup, and it goes well, it's not really fair for you to take the money you just made in that startup and not pay your tax and go buy another stock and keep growing your value." "And for the inheritance tax, there should be a step-up." "People don't realize this, but this is another problem, which is if you die and you have a large asset base, your inheritors get to use the original, the value transfers, and they get the step-up on their basis." "So now when they ultimately sell, no one paid the delta between what you paid and what they got it at. No one paid that tax." "But none of it matters if we don't stop the wasteful spending on housing, education, and healthcare."

David david friedberg says we need to close tax loopholes: "Literally everyone's going to hate me over this, but it's the only way." "Any time there's a loophole that lets people transfer one asset for another without paying tax on the gain, because it's called a tax-free transfer, you have to cut all that." "If you don't cut all that, then people are compounding value without paying taxes when they're realizing value along the way." "That's what's unfair about the tax code today. If you invest in a company, a startup, and it goes well, it's not really fair for you to take the money you just made in that startup and not pay your tax and go buy another stock and keep growing your value." "And for the inheritance tax, there should be a step-up." "People don't realize this, but this is another problem, which is if you die and you have a large asset base, your inheritors get to use the original, the value transfers, and they get the step-up on their basis." "So now when they ultimately sell, no one paid the delta between what you paid and what they got it at. No one paid that tax." "But none of it matters if we don't stop the wasteful spending on housing, education, and healthcare."

Molly O’Shea

29,964 次观看 • 1 个月前

Elon Musk: We'll hopefully demonstrate orbital propellant transfer next year. “One of the other technologies that's key for Mars is doing orbital propellant transfer. So you can think of this like similar to aerial refueling for airplanes, but in this case it's orbital refilling of rockets, which has never been done before. But it is, you know, technically feasible. I always feel like these things are a little NSFW sort of. Listen, you've got to transfer fluid somehow. This has got to be done. The two Starships would get together and one Starship would transfer fuel and oxygen. And actually, most of the mass is oxygen. It's almost 80% oxygen that gets transferred, a little over 20% fuel. So, you send a Starship to orbit with full payload, and then you send a bunch of other Starships up and you would refill the propellant on that Starship. And once the propellant tanks are mostly full, then you can depart for Mars or the Moon. So, this is an important technology which we should hopefully demonstrate next year.” From: SpaceX Update, May 29, 2025

Sensitive content

Elon Musk: We'll hopefully demonstrate orbital propellant transfer next year. “One of the other technologies that's key for Mars is doing orbital propellant transfer. So you can think of this like similar to aerial refueling for airplanes, but in this case it's orbital refilling of rockets, which has never been done before. But it is, you know, technically feasible. I always feel like these things are a little NSFW sort of. Listen, you've got to transfer fluid somehow. This has got to be done. The two Starships would get together and one Starship would transfer fuel and oxygen. And actually, most of the mass is oxygen. It's almost 80% oxygen that gets transferred, a little over 20% fuel. So, you send a Starship to orbit with full payload, and then you send a bunch of other Starships up and you would refill the propellant on that Starship. And once the propellant tanks are mostly full, then you can depart for Mars or the Moon. So, this is an important technology which we should hopefully demonstrate next year.” From: SpaceX Update, May 29, 2025

ELON CLIPS

1,381,385 次观看 • 1 年前

WIN 10,000$ 🚀 Officially announcing the 1of10 Grant for one aspiring YouTuber wanting to go full-time! You might have your life changed forever! Here’s what you get: - 10,000$ USD CASH - For 3 months, strategy calls every 2 weeks with the 1of10 Strategy team (worked on 1B+ views) whose goal will be to help you blow up and optimize your channel by doing those 1-on-1 calls Watch the video below to see the rules more in-depth! How To Win: Step 1 In the next 48 hours, by May 24th 2024, 11:00am EST/5pm CET, you need to do the following: - Link your channel below in the replies - Retweet this post - Follow me (Richard the Youtube strategist) and 1 of 10 Youtube Strategy to make sure to receive DM if you are selected How do we choose the winner: Step 2 From all the participants that follow the instructions above, the 1of10 team will choose 10 aspiring YouTubers. How do we select the 10? We will go through recent uploads, efforts put into the channel, quality of video uploads, upload frequency, originality, production value, educational value, growth potential, overall commitment to YouTube, etc. Step 3 10 very experienced judges will vote each for their top 3 they believe have the most potential of growth, regardless of the niche. Step 4 The one with the most votes will win 10K$ USD + guidance from me and my team for the next 3 months. The other 9 will win one consulting call with the 1of10 Strategy team and lifetime access to the 1of10 platform (1500$ value). My favorite question to ask everyone is “What is your dream?”. Riad and I are hoping with this grant, we can actually fulfill someone’s dream and follow the mission of 1of10 to increase quality content on the platform!! Don’t forget to link your channel below and retweet! Tag someone who you think could be a good fit! Good luck and if this goes well, we will run it again!

WIN 10,000$ 🚀 Officially announcing the 1of10 Grant for one aspiring YouTuber wanting to go full-time! You might have your life changed forever! Here’s what you get: - 10,000$ USD CASH - For 3 months, strategy calls every 2 weeks with the 1of10 Strategy team (worked on 1B+ views) whose goal will be to help you blow up and optimize your channel by doing those 1-on-1 calls Watch the video below to see the rules more in-depth! How To Win: Step 1 In the next 48 hours, by May 24th 2024, 11:00am EST/5pm CET, you need to do the following: - Link your channel below in the replies - Retweet this post - Follow me (Richard the Youtube strategist) and 1 of 10 Youtube Strategy to make sure to receive DM if you are selected How do we choose the winner: Step 2 From all the participants that follow the instructions above, the 1of10 team will choose 10 aspiring YouTubers. How do we select the 10? We will go through recent uploads, efforts put into the channel, quality of video uploads, upload frequency, originality, production value, educational value, growth potential, overall commitment to YouTube, etc. Step 3 10 very experienced judges will vote each for their top 3 they believe have the most potential of growth, regardless of the niche. Step 4 The one with the most votes will win 10K$ USD + guidance from me and my team for the next 3 months. The other 9 will win one consulting call with the 1of10 Strategy team and lifetime access to the 1of10 platform (1500$ value). My favorite question to ask everyone is “What is your dream?”. Riad and I are hoping with this grant, we can actually fulfill someone’s dream and follow the mission of 1of10 to increase quality content on the platform!! Don’t forget to link your channel below and retweet! Tag someone who you think could be a good fit! Good luck and if this goes well, we will run it again!

Richard the Youtube strategist

132,974 次观看 • 2 年前