正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

While Congress debates Clarity, the SEC just went ahead and wrote a rule "Congress has spent years now debating crypto Clarity. So the SEC did something really crazy and radical, they decided to actually write a rule. So maybe we're in an environment now where the legislative process is... show more

The Wolf Of All Streets

1,084,288 subscribers

38,538 次观看 • 7 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

SEC Chair: Will issue crypto market rules if the Clarity Act fails to pass On July 27, 2026, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins Paul Atkins discussed the Clarity Act and the regulation of the U.S. crypto market structure during a CNBC interview. He stated that he is optimistic about Congress passing the bill, with the SEC actively assisting by answering questions and providing technical support. If Congress ultimately fails to act, the SEC is ready, willing, and able to issue rules to address the issues involved in the Clarity Act and improve regulation in other areas of the crypto market. However, Atkins believed that SEC rulemaking cannot replace congressional legislation. The crypto market ultimately still needs a statute to provide more lasting certainty and establish clear safeguards for future regulatory direction and market development.

SEC Chair: Will issue crypto market rules if the Clarity Act fails to pass On July 27, 2026, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins Paul Atkins discussed the Clarity Act and the regulation of the U.S. crypto market structure during a CNBC interview. He stated that he is optimistic about Congress passing the bill, with the SEC actively assisting by answering questions and providing technical support. If Congress ultimately fails to act, the SEC is ready, willing, and able to issue rules to address the issues involved in the Clarity Act and improve regulation in other areas of the crypto market. However, Atkins believed that SEC rulemaking cannot replace congressional legislation. The crypto market ultimately still needs a statute to provide more lasting certainty and establish clear safeguards for future regulatory direction and market development.

Wu Blockchain

18,081 次观看 • 19 天前

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna reveals the two rules every new member of Congress is handed the week they arrive, and Stephen A. Smith can hardly believe what he’s hearing. LUNA: "Every Congress, every two years, the House will come together and kind of come up with the rules of the game." "A lot of members of Congress don't learn that when you first get elected, they just kind of bring you up here and they tell you two things: Never vote against the party and never take down a rule." SMITH: "They actually say that?! Hold on, hold on, Representative. They actually say to you? 'Never vote against the party.' They actually say that to you?!" LUNA: "Yeah, but it's not just us. The Democrats do it too, which is why you see the inner-party fighting. I'd say that Congress is more like a parliament than anything." "And then they'll tell you, 'Don't use the rules and techniques that you're given, because then you're not going back to normal order. We need to make sure that normal order is given.'" "Well, that just means that they want you to shut up and color."

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna reveals the two rules every new member of Congress is handed the week they arrive, and Stephen A. Smith can hardly believe what he’s hearing. LUNA: "Every Congress, every two years, the House will come together and kind of come up with the rules of the game." "A lot of members of Congress don't learn that when you first get elected, they just kind of bring you up here and they tell you two things: Never vote against the party and never take down a rule." SMITH: "They actually say that?! Hold on, hold on, Representative. They actually say to you? 'Never vote against the party.' They actually say that to you?!" LUNA: "Yeah, but it's not just us. The Democrats do it too, which is why you see the inner-party fighting. I'd say that Congress is more like a parliament than anything." "And then they'll tell you, 'Don't use the rules and techniques that you're given, because then you're not going back to normal order. We need to make sure that normal order is given.'" "Well, that just means that they want you to shut up and color."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

674,550 次观看 • 1 个月前

Mamdani: There are neighborhoods today where you can feel the absence of those who do not feel as if they can leave their homes any longer. And now, if New Yorkers want a leader like the governor that we have, who can look at that cruelty and name it for what it is, then they know that the choice is Governor Hochul. If they want a leader who looks at the cruelty of ICE and sees a playbook of what to deliver at an even greater extent in New York State, then that’s Bruce Blakeman. And I know what choice I would make, and I know that New Yorkers feel the same, and we are all standing here because we believe in the values and ideals that make us so proud to be New Yorkers. And then there are those who are willing to traffic in fearmongering, even if it means trampling upon those very ideals, and we will not stand for that.

Mamdani: There are neighborhoods today where you can feel the absence of those who do not feel as if they can leave their homes any longer. And now, if New Yorkers want a leader like the governor that we have, who can look at that cruelty and name it for what it is, then they know that the choice is Governor Hochul. If they want a leader who looks at the cruelty of ICE and sees a playbook of what to deliver at an even greater extent in New York State, then that’s Bruce Blakeman. And I know what choice I would make, and I know that New Yorkers feel the same, and we are all standing here because we believe in the values and ideals that make us so proud to be New Yorkers. And then there are those who are willing to traffic in fearmongering, even if it means trampling upon those very ideals, and we will not stand for that.

Acyn

97,786 次观看 • 6 天前

WATCH: Congressman Andy Barr questions Paul Atkins on the CLARITY Act's impact on market innovation, to which he answers: “Well, as you know, the President has set out the challenge that the U.S. should be the crypto capital of the world. And I feel strongly that we can and should do that and achieve it. So to do that, we have to have a framework that makes sense, that is fit for purpose. Unfortunately, traditional rules that the SEC has, you know, are not really fit for purpose here and have created a lot of uncertainty in the marketplace. Thus the CLARITY Act, and thus the true importance of the SEC, to work very much hand in glove with the CFTC in order that there be no gaps in the oversight, but that also innovators have surety as to what they're doing.” 📺⬇️

WATCH: Congressman Andy Barr questions Paul Atkins on the CLARITY Act's impact on market innovation, to which he answers: “Well, as you know, the President has set out the challenge that the U.S. should be the crypto capital of the world. And I feel strongly that we can and should do that and achieve it. So to do that, we have to have a framework that makes sense, that is fit for purpose. Unfortunately, traditional rules that the SEC has, you know, are not really fit for purpose here and have created a lot of uncertainty in the marketplace. Thus the CLARITY Act, and thus the true importance of the SEC, to work very much hand in glove with the CFTC in order that there be no gaps in the oversight, but that also innovators have surety as to what they're doing.” 📺⬇️

Financial Services GOP

16,788 次观看 • 6 个月前

Reporter: What do you make of Republicans saying that Virginia— AOC: Wah wah wah. We have asked Republicans for 10 years to ban partisan gerrymandering. And for 10 years, Republicans have said no. Republicans have fought for partisan gerrymanders across the United States of America. And these are the rules that they have set. And so if the Republican Party wanted to start this, they did this in North Carolina. They drew out three Democratic members of Congress in North Carolina. They did it in Texas. What they’re just mad at is that they have been accustomed to a Democratic Party that rolls over, doesn’t fight, and takes everything sitting down. And what they’re mad at right now is that we are here in a new day. And we have been asking the Democratic Party to stand up and fight, and now they did—and now the Republican Party doesn’t like the fact that they are fighting against someone who actually will stand up for the American people. So if Republicans decide that they would like to revisit a ban on partisan gerrymandering, I welcome them. We have the bill right here to end this all today. But they don’t want to, because they like pursuing and continuing to enact an unfair electoral landscape. And so we have an obligation to defend ourselves.

Reporter: What do you make of Republicans saying that Virginia— AOC: Wah wah wah. We have asked Republicans for 10 years to ban partisan gerrymandering. And for 10 years, Republicans have said no. Republicans have fought for partisan gerrymanders across the United States of America. And these are the rules that they have set. And so if the Republican Party wanted to start this, they did this in North Carolina. They drew out three Democratic members of Congress in North Carolina. They did it in Texas. What they’re just mad at is that they have been accustomed to a Democratic Party that rolls over, doesn’t fight, and takes everything sitting down. And what they’re mad at right now is that we are here in a new day. And we have been asking the Democratic Party to stand up and fight, and now they did—and now the Republican Party doesn’t like the fact that they are fighting against someone who actually will stand up for the American people. So if Republicans decide that they would like to revisit a ban on partisan gerrymandering, I welcome them. We have the bill right here to end this all today. But they don’t want to, because they like pursuing and continuing to enact an unfair electoral landscape. And so we have an obligation to defend ourselves.

Acyn

2,321,364 次观看 • 3 个月前

Few people are actually paying attention to the fact we are on the edge of a generational bull run in Bitcoin and crypto that will be spearheaded by the Clarity act and Market Structure bill. There is going to be insatiable demand for digital assets once the market digests this.

Few people are actually paying attention to the fact we are on the edge of a generational bull run in Bitcoin and crypto that will be spearheaded by the Clarity act and Market Structure bill. There is going to be insatiable demand for digital assets once the market digests this.

The ₿itcoin Therapist

38,770 次观看 • 6 个月前

BREAKING: The SEC just said crypto rules are coming with or without Congress. Chair Atkins on CNBC. "Ready, willing and able" to write market structure rules itself. Days after the Senate shelved the CLARITY Act until after recess. Passage odds dropped to 27%. Down from 82% in February. Here's what that fallback actually costs. SEC rulemaking typically takes 12 to 15 months. Final rules wouldn't land until late 2027 at the earliest. Compare that to a signed statute today. Atkins still prefers legislation. His own words: "Statute is the way to future-proof something." Congress can shift majorities every two years. SEC rules can get challenged in court, or rewritten by the next administration. Congress can delay the vote. It can't delay the outcome forever. But the SEC's Plan B isn't fast. It's just certain.

BREAKING: The SEC just said crypto rules are coming with or without Congress. Chair Atkins on CNBC. "Ready, willing and able" to write market structure rules itself. Days after the Senate shelved the CLARITY Act until after recess. Passage odds dropped to 27%. Down from 82% in February. Here's what that fallback actually costs. SEC rulemaking typically takes 12 to 15 months. Final rules wouldn't land until late 2027 at the earliest. Compare that to a signed statute today. Atkins still prefers legislation. His own words: "Statute is the way to future-proof something." Congress can shift majorities every two years. SEC rules can get challenged in court, or rewritten by the next administration. Congress can delay the vote. It can't delay the outcome forever. But the SEC's Plan B isn't fast. It's just certain.

Crypto Tice

22,078 次观看 • 17 天前

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,719 次观看 • 3 个月前

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

696,635 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”

DogeDesigner

63,600 次观看 • 7 天前

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 SENATOR ELIZABETH WARREN JUST ACCUSED THE CRYPTO INDUSTRY IS BRIBING THE SENATE TO PASS THE CLARITY ACT 🤯 "THEY THINK THEY CAN BUY CONGRESS AND THAT IT WILL DO WHATEVER THEY WANT" "THIS BILL HELPS DONALD TRUMP MAKE HIS NEXT $1.4 BILLION ON CRYPTO SCAMS" "THIS IS NOT GOOD LEGISLATION" DEMOCRATS ARE NOW TRYING TO KILL THIS BILL

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 SENATOR ELIZABETH WARREN JUST ACCUSED THE CRYPTO INDUSTRY IS BRIBING THE SENATE TO PASS THE CLARITY ACT 🤯 "THEY THINK THEY CAN BUY CONGRESS AND THAT IT WILL DO WHATEVER THEY WANT" "THIS BILL HELPS DONALD TRUMP MAKE HIS NEXT $1.4 BILLION ON CRYPTO SCAMS" "THIS IS NOT GOOD LEGISLATION" DEMOCRATS ARE NOW TRYING TO KILL THIS BILL

Vivek Sen

77,170 次观看 • 12 天前

🚨 CLARITY ACT NEWS UPDATE: THE PRESSURE IS MOVING FROM TALK TO IMPLEMENTATION. 🚨 The White House just pushed back on claims that it is blocking Democratic seats at the SEC and CFTC, saying it asked for names and has not received them. Why does this matter for $XRP? Because CLARITY is not only about passing a bill. It is about having regulators ready to enforce the new rulebook after it passes. The SEC and CFTC are the referees. If digital assets finally get clear lanes, those agencies need people in the seats to define securities, commodities, and market rules. That is why this fight matters. Washington is no longer debating whether crypto exists. They are debating who runs the system once the rules arrive. For XRP holders, that is the shift. A real framework means institutions can stop guessing and start building around settlement, liquidity and tokenized value.

🚨 CLARITY ACT NEWS UPDATE: THE PRESSURE IS MOVING FROM TALK TO IMPLEMENTATION. 🚨 The White House just pushed back on claims that it is blocking Democratic seats at the SEC and CFTC, saying it asked for names and has not received them. Why does this matter for $XRP? Because CLARITY is not only about passing a bill. It is about having regulators ready to enforce the new rulebook after it passes. The SEC and CFTC are the referees. If digital assets finally get clear lanes, those agencies need people in the seats to define securities, commodities, and market rules. That is why this fight matters. Washington is no longer debating whether crypto exists. They are debating who runs the system once the rules arrive. For XRP holders, that is the shift. A real framework means institutions can stop guessing and start building around settlement, liquidity and tokenized value.

X Finance Bull

44,710 次观看 • 1 个月前

#BREAKING: Lina Khan: “In our constitutional system, it is Congress that writes the laws and I think this is a really important point because it’s important to recognize that both of these decisions are part of an ongoing attack by the Supreme Court on the ability of Congress to govern. This has been a trend that we’ve now seen for several years where the Supreme Court is systematically undermining Congress, and what that means is you have our least accountable branch of government undercutting our most accountable branch of government, and that’s a real recipe for entrenched minority rule and effectively oligarchy and so it’s important to understand this decision against that backdrop and as part of a broader power grab by the Supreme Court itself.” 😳

#BREAKING: Lina Khan: “In our constitutional system, it is Congress that writes the laws and I think this is a really important point because it’s important to recognize that both of these decisions are part of an ongoing attack by the Supreme Court on the ability of Congress to govern. This has been a trend that we’ve now seen for several years where the Supreme Court is systematically undermining Congress, and what that means is you have our least accountable branch of government undercutting our most accountable branch of government, and that’s a real recipe for entrenched minority rule and effectively oligarchy and so it’s important to understand this decision against that backdrop and as part of a broader power grab by the Supreme Court itself.” 😳

Emoluments Clause

35,308 次观看 • 1 个月前

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸: "The person who writes down the thing has tremendous power." "There are so few people who will just like write down the thing. And so we see this at companies all the time, which is, one of the ways you find the up-and-comers at a tech company is just, okay, who wrote down the plan? And, you know, that doesn't mean they came up with everything. And that doesn't mean that they had all the ideas, but they're actually able to organize their thoughts and then actually have the energy and the motivation and the skill to be able to communicate in a written form. That actually stands out." With David Perell

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸: "The person who writes down the thing has tremendous power." "There are so few people who will just like write down the thing. And so we see this at companies all the time, which is, one of the ways you find the up-and-comers at a tech company is just, okay, who wrote down the plan? And, you know, that doesn't mean they came up with everything. And that doesn't mean that they had all the ideas, but they're actually able to organize their thoughts and then actually have the energy and the motivation and the skill to be able to communicate in a written form. That actually stands out." With David Perell

a16z

167,057 次观看 • 4 个月前

TMZ flips the script and does real reporting. They finally call out Democrats and say EVERYONE in congress needs to be voted out They have evidence of Congress partying like they’re on Spring Break while everyone else has to deal with the shutdown “It's not the other party, it's both parties and we are kind of sick of the way they are patronizing us and that's why we're doing this. Something has to change” “We have talked about what we call the outer movement, OWTA out with their asses, voting everybody out, even the ones you like to reset things and make it clear to the next group. Here is our expectation that you will keep the government open, that federal workers will get paid. And if you don't do that, we're gonna throw you out. Like we threw your predecessors out. So that seems to be the only maybe last resort of regaining some power”

TMZ flips the script and does real reporting. They finally call out Democrats and say EVERYONE in congress needs to be voted out They have evidence of Congress partying like they’re on Spring Break while everyone else has to deal with the shutdown “It's not the other party, it's both parties and we are kind of sick of the way they are patronizing us and that's why we're doing this. Something has to change” “We have talked about what we call the outer movement, OWTA out with their asses, voting everybody out, even the ones you like to reset things and make it clear to the next group. Here is our expectation that you will keep the government open, that federal workers will get paid. And if you don't do that, we're gonna throw you out. Like we threw your predecessors out. So that seems to be the only maybe last resort of regaining some power”

Wall Street Apes

831,134 次观看 • 4 个月前