"While I understand calls for a ceasefire at this stage, I do not believe that it is the correct position now," Sir Keir Starmer says Labour's leader says "Hamas would be emboldened" and would "start preparing for future violence immediately"

Tony Blair 4.0

Our politicians and democracy is bought by Israel.

Cowardly and unforgivable

@Keir_Starmer is right. Ceasefire for Hamas = Reload. Anyone who wants peace should be calling for Hamas to surrender.

It’s time to bring Jeremy Corbyn back

As an advocate for a ceasefire, I firmly believe that innocent women and children are suffering the most in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Gaza. It's imperative to stop the violence immediately to prevent further civilian casualties. A ceasefire would provide an opportunity for humanitarian aid to reach those in need and for negotiations to take place in pursuit of a more lasting peace. Additionally, it could help de-escalate the situation and create an environment where a long-term solution to the conflict can be pursued without the immediate threat of violence. I contend that anyone who supports continuing the war instead of a ceasefire may be complicit in the genocide of innocent Palestinians.

"Gaza has become a graveyard for children. It's a living hell for everyone else.” - @UNICEF

Contradicting himself over and over wants a pause in the fighting for aid and hostages to be released yet doesn’t want a ceasefire? Make it make sense

Wearing a poppy while backing open-ended warfare to achieve virtually impossible war aims is quite the look.

Starmer grovelling to his Establishment masters at Chatham House, calling for Israel to continue mass murdering Gazans, and supporting the Zionist 2 state solution hoax