Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

While this guy is trying to pour water in a rush, another guy is making $11,970 a month selling restaurants a tool that removes the rush. The difference between them is one question. "When a customer messages you after hours, what happens?" Every owner knows the answer. Nothing. The... show more

Superior

8,788 subscribers

34,789 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Haruna the robot waiter can bring you ice coffees. She cannot answer your Instagram DM at 2am asking if there's parking nearby. Most restaurants in your city still pay $3,000/month for a human to answer the same 10 questions on repeat. A Claude chatbot answers all of them in 1.2 seconds. 24/7. For $399/month. It's embedded on the restaurant website and handles every question the staff gets 40-60 times a day hours, menu, reservations, delivery, location, dietary options. In any language. Without calling in sick. One person built this business for local restaurants. $399/month per client. 4 hours of setup. 30 clients. $11,970/month. Every restaurant in every city has this problem. Fewer than 3% have solved it. That gap is still wide open.

Haruna the robot waiter can bring you ice coffees. She cannot answer your Instagram DM at 2am asking if there's parking nearby. Most restaurants in your city still pay $3,000/month for a human to answer the same 10 questions on repeat. A Claude chatbot answers all of them in 1.2 seconds. 24/7. For $399/month. It's embedded on the restaurant website and handles every question the staff gets 40-60 times a day hours, menu, reservations, delivery, location, dietary options. In any language. Without calling in sick. One person built this business for local restaurants. $399/month per client. 4 hours of setup. 30 clients. $11,970/month. Every restaurant in every city has this problem. Fewer than 3% have solved it. That gap is still wide open.

Andrey Superior

12,427 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

He walked into a restaurant during a quiet Tuesday afternoon. He didn't pitch software. He showed the owner his phone. "Type an order like a customer would." The chatbot took the order, confirmed the table, logged it in a Google Sheet, and sent it to the kitchen in under two seconds. The owner asked how much. "$500/month. First month free. If it doesn't save your staff real time, you owe nothing." That conversation has played out 30 times. It closed 30 times. 30 clients. $500/month each. 4 hours of setup per restaurant. 93% margin. Over 1 million restaurants in the US. Fewer than 3% have this. He just keeps walking in during quiet Tuesday afternoons.

He walked into a restaurant during a quiet Tuesday afternoon. He didn't pitch software. He showed the owner his phone. "Type an order like a customer would." The chatbot took the order, confirmed the table, logged it in a Google Sheet, and sent it to the kitchen in under two seconds. The owner asked how much. "$500/month. First month free. If it doesn't save your staff real time, you owe nothing." That conversation has played out 30 times. It closed 30 times. 30 clients. $500/month each. 4 hours of setup per restaurant. 93% margin. Over 1 million restaurants in the US. Fewer than 3% have this. He just keeps walking in during quiet Tuesday afternoons.

Superior

836,689 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

A BBC interviewer asked a Nobel physicist the simplest question in the world: why do two magnets push each other apart. He refused to answer it. What he did instead is the best seven minutes on thinking ever filmed. The man is Richard Feynman, at home in 1983, no blackboard, no notes, sitting in an armchair. He does not dodge because he cannot answer. He dodges because he wants you to see what the question is actually asking. So he takes an ordinary sentence, that a woman slipped on the ice and broke her hip, and starts asking why, and every answer opens another why, until the ground gives way. Then he turns it around on the interviewer with a question about ice that sounds trivial and is not. The point he arrives at is the uncomfortable one. Every explanation is only a translation into something you already accept without explanation. Magnets have no such translation. There is nothing more familiar than magnetism to reduce magnetism to, which is why every answer you were given at school was a picture, not a reason. It matters more now than it did in 1983. Any tool will hand you a fluent answer in a second. Knowing which questions actually have a bottom is the part that is still yours. One question. Seven minutes. It is in the video.

A BBC interviewer asked a Nobel physicist the simplest question in the world: why do two magnets push each other apart. He refused to answer it. What he did instead is the best seven minutes on thinking ever filmed. The man is Richard Feynman, at home in 1983, no blackboard, no notes, sitting in an armchair. He does not dodge because he cannot answer. He dodges because he wants you to see what the question is actually asking. So he takes an ordinary sentence, that a woman slipped on the ice and broke her hip, and starts asking why, and every answer opens another why, until the ground gives way. Then he turns it around on the interviewer with a question about ice that sounds trivial and is not. The point he arrives at is the uncomfortable one. Every explanation is only a translation into something you already accept without explanation. Magnets have no such translation. There is nothing more familiar than magnetism to reduce magnetism to, which is why every answer you were given at school was a picture, not a reason. It matters more now than it did in 1983. Any tool will hand you a fluent answer in a second. Knowing which questions actually have a bottom is the part that is still yours. One question. Seven minutes. It is in the video.

Stefan.

2,894,698 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Trump was just asked whether he would use NUKES on Iran: "I would never say that but the answer is yes. There is no reason for that. What a stupid question." So he literally answered the question he said he would never answer in the same breath. The guy is a complete JOKE!

Trump was just asked whether he would use NUKES on Iran: "I would never say that but the answer is yes. There is no reason for that. What a stupid question." So he literally answered the question he said he would never answer in the same breath. The guy is a complete JOKE!

Brian Krassenstein

95,797 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

This guy describes what goes on at his neighbor's house. He claims that no matter what time it is from evening until morning, every single light in every single room is on. This happens every night. To make it even weirder, there's a car always running with nobody inside it outside. On this particular day, it has the windshield wipers on. What is going on in that house? That's the million-dollar question.

This guy describes what goes on at his neighbor's house. He claims that no matter what time it is from evening until morning, every single light in every single room is on. This happens every night. To make it even weirder, there's a car always running with nobody inside it outside. On this particular day, it has the windshield wipers on. What is going on in that house? That's the million-dollar question.

Suzee Q

447,596 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

According to the video, it seems a mother shared her 31-year-old daughter's phone number in church. One of the guys reached out to her daughter. She asked how he got her number, and he said her mother shared it in church today. Away from that, this lady in this video claimed there is no difference between a 30-year-old man and a 30-year-old woman, which the guy disagreed with and gave his reasons. My question now is, do you think there is a difference between a 30-year-old man and a 30-year-old woman?

According to the video, it seems a mother shared her 31-year-old daughter's phone number in church. One of the guys reached out to her daughter. She asked how he got her number, and he said her mother shared it in church today. Away from that, this lady in this video claimed there is no difference between a 30-year-old man and a 30-year-old woman, which the guy disagreed with and gave his reasons. My question now is, do you think there is a difference between a 30-year-old man and a 30-year-old woman?

declasiq_esmi

106,339 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

She came to buy a bottle of water but finally found true love with an unusually guy ! The crazy part is that the lady is a millionaire while the guy is a very poor guy . The lesson is massive

She came to buy a bottle of water but finally found true love with an unusually guy ! The crazy part is that the lady is a millionaire while the guy is a very poor guy . The lesson is massive

AFRICAMUSTBEFREE!!!!!!!

37,185 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This home owner gets a security cam message on his phone. When he looks, he sees somebody standing in his front walk way looking on their phone. Who would be standing there at in the dark on a Monday night, he wonders. Engaging the door cam, the owner asks: "Can I help you?" What happens next is almost comical. First the guy announces that he's working with somebody down the street, and he's their late night "bug guy" and was hoping that the home owner might have a bottled water, protein bar or a Gatorade that he can have because he didn't want to bother them. When that tactic didn't work, this stranger at the door goes into his pitch, and the real reason he's there. It's a door to door sales guy hoping to pester his way into getting the home owners to listen to his sales pitch and make a sale for his bug control job. I think the home owner was much nicer than I would be! What would be your reaction? Do you see this guy as a pain in the butt, or just some guy trying to make a living like the rest of us?

This home owner gets a security cam message on his phone. When he looks, he sees somebody standing in his front walk way looking on their phone. Who would be standing there at in the dark on a Monday night, he wonders. Engaging the door cam, the owner asks: "Can I help you?" What happens next is almost comical. First the guy announces that he's working with somebody down the street, and he's their late night "bug guy" and was hoping that the home owner might have a bottled water, protein bar or a Gatorade that he can have because he didn't want to bother them. When that tactic didn't work, this stranger at the door goes into his pitch, and the real reason he's there. It's a door to door sales guy hoping to pester his way into getting the home owners to listen to his sales pitch and make a sale for his bug control job. I think the home owner was much nicer than I would be! What would be your reaction? Do you see this guy as a pain in the butt, or just some guy trying to make a living like the rest of us?

AllieJade

864,487 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

A kid in his tshirt sold an AI receptionist to a hair salon while drinking coffee. $399 a month from the one client. 30 minutes of work. He opened vacancies. Found a salon in Bay Park about to hire someone for $3,000 a month. Copied their website. ChatGPT wrote the system prompt. He dropped it into VAPI. 20 minutes later there was a voice agent answering calls in the salon's tone. He called the salon. Said nobody picked up yesterday. The owner apologized. The kid said cool, I built you an AI receptionist that answers 24/7. Want to hear it? He played the demo on the phone. The owner thinks he spent a week on it. He charges $399 a month. They save $2,600. He has 30 clients. His full setup is below.

A kid in his tshirt sold an AI receptionist to a hair salon while drinking coffee. $399 a month from the one client. 30 minutes of work. He opened vacancies. Found a salon in Bay Park about to hire someone for $3,000 a month. Copied their website. ChatGPT wrote the system prompt. He dropped it into VAPI. 20 minutes later there was a voice agent answering calls in the salon's tone. He called the salon. Said nobody picked up yesterday. The owner apologized. The kid said cool, I built you an AI receptionist that answers 24/7. Want to hear it? He played the demo on the phone. The owner thinks he spent a week on it. He charges $399 a month. They save $2,600. He has 30 clients. His full setup is below.

Superior

47,818 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Friends! As you know, every day we show you a snapshot of our lives and there is A LOT of Shenanigans that goes on in this House. But the reality of sharing a video with you Every Single Day is that Mum has hours and hours of footage where nothing much happens other than STARING. Us Cats and Dogs stare at each other A LOT. The question is… do you want to see it? #FridayFeeling

Friends! As you know, every day we show you a snapshot of our lives and there is A LOT of Shenanigans that goes on in this House. But the reality of sharing a video with you Every Single Day is that Mum has hours and hours of footage where nothing much happens other than STARING. Us Cats and Dogs stare at each other A LOT. The question is… do you want to see it? #FridayFeeling

Malcolm & Baby Dog

15,425 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

2. What is the 86-hour water fast? This is a twist on the 7-day water fast. You start with just water for the first 24 hours, possibly adding some no-calorie electrolytes. Then, you can have bone broth for the next two days. Here's the guy that inspired Dana explaining it:

2. What is the 86-hour water fast? This is a twist on the 7-day water fast. You start with just water for the first 24 hours, possibly adding some no-calorie electrolytes. Then, you can have bone broth for the next two days. Here's the guy that inspired Dana explaining it:

Joey Yochheim

763,334 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Everything on this video about Joe Biden cheat sheet is a lie from the pit of hell. First, the person asking the question knows it's a lie. The The White House often reaches out to reporters including the person asking the question to send 'topics' that end up being 'questions' in advance. The Karoline Leavitt then prepares answers and calls on the people who have sent topics in advance and those in the front row. The entire thing is rigged, a show, a sham. Even this question and answer session is a sham. It's known by everyone covering the White House that it's all rigged.

Everything on this video about Joe Biden cheat sheet is a lie from the pit of hell. First, the person asking the question knows it's a lie. The The White House often reaches out to reporters including the person asking the question to send 'topics' that end up being 'questions' in advance. The Karoline Leavitt then prepares answers and calls on the people who have sent topics in advance and those in the front row. The entire thing is rigged, a show, a sham. Even this question and answer session is a sham. It's known by everyone covering the White House that it's all rigged.

Simon Ateba

2,128,062 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Crockett: For Trump to say Epstein is a non-factor—when we can go and find picture after picture of the two of them together—that’s a very interesting concept, right? This idea that he’s a “non-factor”—well, why were you hanging around with non-factors, Mr. President? What was that about? I think he’s making it worse now that he’s seemingly privy to everything in the files—and suddenly doesn’t want to release them. When he was on the outside, I guess he just wasn’t confident in the investigations and didn’t think there was anything that necessarily linked him. He is, overall, a creep. Like—we know he’s a creep. The question is: is he also a criminal in that way? And the fact that he’s so adamant about not releasing the Epstein files—I think that kind of answers the question.

Crockett: For Trump to say Epstein is a non-factor—when we can go and find picture after picture of the two of them together—that’s a very interesting concept, right? This idea that he’s a “non-factor”—well, why were you hanging around with non-factors, Mr. President? What was that about? I think he’s making it worse now that he’s seemingly privy to everything in the files—and suddenly doesn’t want to release them. When he was on the outside, I guess he just wasn’t confident in the investigations and didn’t think there was anything that necessarily linked him. He is, overall, a creep. Like—we know he’s a creep. The question is: is he also a criminal in that way? And the fact that he’s so adamant about not releasing the Epstein files—I think that kind of answers the question.

Acyn

51,268 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

There are thousands of Epstein files. They have names in them. Child rapists. Real ones. And nobody is touching them. Now look at where the energy is going instead. A task force. Overtime. A press conference. For a guy who touched some some water and maybe some peeling paint at the reflecting pool. Read that again. That's the whole game right there. They are counting on you to be too busy, too tired, too distracted to ask the one question that matters: why are the actual predators safe while the Ex Olympian paint guy gets the manhunt? Here's what I know. When someone shows you what they protect and what they punish, believe them. That is not a mistake. That is a choice. Every single time. So don't look away. Ask the question. Say it out loud. Because the moment enough people stop watching the wrong hand, the trick stops working. ~Mitch

There are thousands of Epstein files. They have names in them. Child rapists. Real ones. And nobody is touching them. Now look at where the energy is going instead. A task force. Overtime. A press conference. For a guy who touched some some water and maybe some peeling paint at the reflecting pool. Read that again. That's the whole game right there. They are counting on you to be too busy, too tired, too distracted to ask the one question that matters: why are the actual predators safe while the Ex Olympian paint guy gets the manhunt? Here's what I know. When someone shows you what they protect and what they punish, believe them. That is not a mistake. That is a choice. Every single time. So don't look away. Ask the question. Say it out loud. Because the moment enough people stop watching the wrong hand, the trick stops working. ~Mitch

Mitch Jackson, Esq.

67,438 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

What did Caleb Williams prove in the Bears comeback win over the Giants? Danny Parkins answers: “That he is the one. He is the one. He is the answer to all I’ve wanted my entire life as a Bears fan.”

What did Caleb Williams prove in the Bears comeback win over the Giants? Danny Parkins answers: “That he is the one. He is the one. He is the answer to all I’ve wanted my entire life as a Bears fan.”

First Things First

164,514 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

"This is not a guy who's creating a better widget that enriches people's lives... the company wins when the customer wins."⁣ ⁣ That's the difference between creating value and extracting it.

"This is not a guy who's creating a better widget that enriches people's lives... the company wins when the customer wins."⁣ ⁣ That's the difference between creating value and extracting it.

Justin Wolfers

27,241 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

the camera being in a tight close up on both ilya and shane for the entirety of this scene, except for the moment when ilya is working up the courage to say he’s in love. it’s like for the whole conversation it’s just the two of them, there’s nobody else who matters, and then for a brief moment the shot widens as ilya considers the implications of the fact he’s in love with shane. the fact that the rest of the world DOES matter and will always be a presence in their relationship. we’ve been held in this moment between the two of them and by widening the shot, that intimacy is broken just for a second as we’re reminded that there is a world beyond the two of them and ilya is still in russia. what he’s doing is incredibly dangerous. then the camera tightens back into a close up as he realises he needs to say it anyway because all that matters is that he’s on the phone with shane and he’s in love with him. it really is just the two of them in this moment and he doesn’t want to let anyone else in.

the camera being in a tight close up on both ilya and shane for the entirety of this scene, except for the moment when ilya is working up the courage to say he’s in love. it’s like for the whole conversation it’s just the two of them, there’s nobody else who matters, and then for a brief moment the shot widens as ilya considers the implications of the fact he’s in love with shane. the fact that the rest of the world DOES matter and will always be a presence in their relationship. we’ve been held in this moment between the two of them and by widening the shot, that intimacy is broken just for a second as we’re reminded that there is a world beyond the two of them and ilya is still in russia. what he’s doing is incredibly dangerous. then the camera tightens back into a close up as he realises he needs to say it anyway because all that matters is that he’s on the phone with shane and he’s in love with him. it really is just the two of them in this moment and he doesn’t want to let anyone else in.

frances 🏒

294,736 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

HE WANTED JORGE. JORGE KNEW EXACTLY WHY HE HAD TO SAY NO. David and Jorge finally get a moment alone in the elevator, and the tension is obvious. The brutal part is that this isn’t really about whether there’s attraction between them. There is. Jorge has to choose between what he feels and what he knows he shouldn’t do because David is still a student. That makes the scene hit harder than a simple romantic moment. Sometimes the most intense scene is the one where nothing happens. The looks. The hesitation. And then the decision to walk away. That says everything.

HE WANTED JORGE. JORGE KNEW EXACTLY WHY HE HAD TO SAY NO. David and Jorge finally get a moment alone in the elevator, and the tension is obvious. The brutal part is that this isn’t really about whether there’s attraction between them. There is. Jorge has to choose between what he feels and what he knows he shouldn’t do because David is still a student. That makes the scene hit harder than a simple romantic moment. Sometimes the most intense scene is the one where nothing happens. The looks. The hesitation. And then the decision to walk away. That says everything.

ADEX🕴️

508,173 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen