Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

while you refresh deciding "ape or not", the mantis already took 4 entries, 4 exits and went back to flat MANTIS is a code-built 3D sniper bot for fresh pump fun mints. Canvas 2D plus its own 3D math: every part lives in X / Y / Z, rotates... on three axes and gets depth-sorted every frame the idea: a pump fun trade is not a click. it is a hunt. find the mint, aim, hit the window, take it and leave before the curve turns. the terminal shows that hunt with the bot's body, and the panels translate every move into trade language how it works: 1. ONE TRADE = ONE STRIKE in 5 phases: aim 0.85s → rush 0.35s → fill 0.14s → take profit 1.1s → next mint 0.6s. the bot does not hold bags, it closes them on the recoil 2. 4 MINTS PER LOOP: ZAP / Moth / KEK / HIVE at 2.1 / 5.3 / 8.4 / 11.4s. every entry hits a different side of the cell, zero repeats 3. BANKROLL with entry size 9 / 17 / 11 / 13% and back to FLAT · READY 2.4s after the fill. below 90% free SOL the gauge turns red: you are in a position 4. BUY FLOW per mint: pressure builds on aim, peaks on fill, fades on exit. 4 bars, 4 tickers, readable in one second 5. ENTRY TIMING: oscilloscope of both raptorial arms over 3.0s × 72 samples. the red FILL mark lands exactly where the claws touched the glass, not "around there" 6. MINT RADAR on 85 cells moves focus across new mints, a 12-event TRADE LOG flows top-down: scan → filter dev wallet + curve → snipe → exit → next mint. ORDER FLOW on 34 bands shows peak tx/s and bot load most pump fun "terminals" are a chart and hope. here every trade is visible as an action: the bot aims at KEK, the radar locks the mint, buy flow goes red, bankroll drops to 89%, the log prints SNIPE, the scope stamps FILL. one move, six witnesses red only where money is decided: the bot's eyes, the fill point, a position at riskshow more

cryptopsihoz

15,411 subscribers

18,051 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

16 Comments

Jabo5 days ago

@Pumpfun the six witnesses around each trade make the execution easy to follow

cryptopsihoz5 days ago

@Pumpfun

rudolphhh5 days ago

@Pumpfun one trade one strike is a clean way to frame it

cryptopsihoz5 days ago

@Pumpfun

mrpicule.eth5 days ago

@Pumpfun trading bots are evolving into pure metal gear man

cryptopsihoz5 days ago

@Pumpfun soon bots start hiding in boxes liquidation snake era

Dripxel.eth5 days ago

@Pumpfun this is kind of innovation we have been waiting for

Captain web.5 days ago

@Pumpfun this is kind of innovation we have been waiting for.

Jaouad 5 days ago

@Pumpfun entry sizes like 9 and 17% feel spicy, ever nuke a loop?

KaKa_Defi5 days ago

@Pumpfun 0.14s fill time is actually disgusting levels of speed

Lenda Noire5 days ago

@Pumpfun I guess I’ll keep practicing my reflexes while mantis moves in hyperdrive Maybe one day I’ll be that fast, but fr that’s next level

Cin5 days ago

@Pumpfun that bot moves like it’s got a grudge

Timi5 days ago

@Pumpfun this is a much more interesting use of 3D than just making a terminal look flashy

Naly5 days ago

@Pumpfun that bot moves like it’s got a grudge

vibelancer5 days ago

@Pumpfun finally a terminal that actually moves

SOHEIL5 days ago

@Pumpfun the precision in timing is impressive

Related Videos

The GPT-6 Astra brain, a neural copy of 169 winning Robinhood memecoin traders, is about to touch real money for the first time. Six gates stand between what it wants and my deposit, and I'm not one of them. > PROVENANCE. Whose fill is it really. Gifted or dust dies here, 1 fill in 11 > COHORT. Who went in, at what cost, with what record. Averaging down is not entering > TOKEN. Seeded, or can't even sell. A sell probe runs before a dollar moves > MARKET. How far above the wallets' own cost, and whether the candle is already tired > RISK. Never above 4% of the deposit, five positions max, the day stops at minus 6% > EXECUTE. Slippage cap, two tries. No fill, walk away The three middle gates have to say yes at the same second or nothing happens. The right token at the wrong price parks and knocks again in 90 seconds. A token that turns out seeded after entry closes itself, whatever the PnL. Half of every profit goes back into the deposit that sizes the next trade. Half buys $FOMOBRAIN and burns it. Every result goes into the score of the wallet that caused it, so the judge learns what its own picks did. Every no gets written down with its reason. The gates are built, and the wallet is next. God bless us.

The GPT-6 Astra brain, a neural copy of 169 winning Robinhood memecoin traders, is about to touch real money for the first time. Six gates stand between what it wants and my deposit, and I'm not one of them. > PROVENANCE. Whose fill is it really. Gifted or dust dies here, 1 fill in 11 > COHORT. Who went in, at what cost, with what record. Averaging down is not entering > TOKEN. Seeded, or can't even sell. A sell probe runs before a dollar moves > MARKET. How far above the wallets' own cost, and whether the candle is already tired > RISK. Never above 4% of the deposit, five positions max, the day stops at minus 6% > EXECUTE. Slippage cap, two tries. No fill, walk away The three middle gates have to say yes at the same second or nothing happens. The right token at the wrong price parks and knocks again in 90 seconds. A token that turns out seeded after entry closes itself, whatever the PnL. Half of every profit goes back into the deposit that sizes the next trade. Half buys $FOMOBRAIN and burns it. Every result goes into the score of the wallet that caused it, so the judge learns what its own picks did. Every no gets written down with its reason. The gates are built, and the wallet is next. God bless us.

cvxv666

11,917 views • 24 days ago

HOLY SH*T MY GROK BOT BOUGHT $GRASS AT $30K CAP AND SOLD AT $2M 66x on one trade, completely autonomous, ETH chain The bot scans every new launch on Robinhood, runs safety checks, waits for the right entry. GRASS passed all 4: no honeypot, verified, renounced, LP burned 95% Entered at $30K market cap with 0.3 ETH. watched the chart pump to $2M with 5,000+ holders flooding in. exited at the exact moment momentum broke Look at the chart after my bot sold: straight down from $2M to $300K. anyone who held through that gave back everything. the bot didn't hold, it read the momentum reversal and got out +19.7 ETH from one position. $49,000 Architecture: > terminal scanner on ETH, every new launch > 4-point safety check before entry > keys stay on my phone > auto-exit on momentum reversal, not price target > the exit is the whole edge, not the entry the chart tells the story. green candles up, sell at the top, red candles down. bot was already gonemy

HOLY SH*T MY GROK BOT BOUGHT $GRASS AT $30K CAP AND SOLD AT $2M 66x on one trade, completely autonomous, ETH chain The bot scans every new launch on Robinhood, runs safety checks, waits for the right entry. GRASS passed all 4: no honeypot, verified, renounced, LP burned 95% Entered at $30K market cap with 0.3 ETH. watched the chart pump to $2M with 5,000+ holders flooding in. exited at the exact moment momentum broke Look at the chart after my bot sold: straight down from $2M to $300K. anyone who held through that gave back everything. the bot didn't hold, it read the momentum reversal and got out +19.7 ETH from one position. $49,000 Architecture: > terminal scanner on ETH, every new launch > 4-point safety check before entry > keys stay on my phone > auto-exit on momentum reversal, not price target > the exit is the whole edge, not the entry the chart tells the story. green candles up, sell at the top, red candles down. bot was already gonemy

Zynex

35,576 views • 17 days ago

HOLY SH*T MY GROK BOT BOUGHT $GRASS AT $30K CAP AND SOLD AT $2M 66x on one trade, completely autonomous, ETH chain The bot scans every new launch on Robinhood, runs safety checks, waits for the right entry. GRASS passed all 4: no honeypot, verified, renounced, LP burned 95% Entered at $30K market cap with 0.3 ETH. watched the chart pump to $2M with 5,000+ holders flooding in. exited at the exact moment momentum broke Look at the chart after my bot sold: straight down from $2M to $300K. anyone who held through that gave back everything. the bot didn't hold, it read the momentum reversal and got out +19.7 ETH from one position. $49,000 Architecture: > terminal scanner on ETH, every new launch > 4-point safety check before entry > keys stay on my phone > auto-exit on momentum reversal, not price target > the exit is the whole edge, not the entry the chart tells the story. green candles up, sell at the top, red candles down. bot was already gonemy

HOLY SH*T MY GROK BOT BOUGHT $GRASS AT $30K CAP AND SOLD AT $2M 66x on one trade, completely autonomous, ETH chain The bot scans every new launch on Robinhood, runs safety checks, waits for the right entry. GRASS passed all 4: no honeypot, verified, renounced, LP burned 95% Entered at $30K market cap with 0.3 ETH. watched the chart pump to $2M with 5,000+ holders flooding in. exited at the exact moment momentum broke Look at the chart after my bot sold: straight down from $2M to $300K. anyone who held through that gave back everything. the bot didn't hold, it read the momentum reversal and got out +19.7 ETH from one position. $49,000 Architecture: > terminal scanner on ETH, every new launch > 4-point safety check before entry > keys stay on my phone > auto-exit on momentum reversal, not price target > the exit is the whole edge, not the entry the chart tells the story. green candles up, sell at the top, red candles down. bot was already gonemy

Zynex

133,231 views • 1 month ago

GPT-6 ASTRA BOT started the night with $120.23. It ended with $172,641.86. I gave it a wallet and one rule. It built the rest. The terminal is one screen. Orders show up on a depth radar the second they're born, float up the grid, and either fill or they don't. Wallet by wallet, live. No dashboard to configure, it drew its own. Six lanes run it. Each does exactly one thing: > DISCOVERY catches every deploy the second it lands on chain > SIGNAL scores 51,784 wallets and surfaces the ones that enter before the candle forms > PRICING checks LP depth and mint authority, rejects anything thin before it costs a cent > EXECUTION copytrades the smart money, snipes the clean mints, passes on the rest > RISK writes the size before the entry, so one misfire never outweighs a week of hits > OVERSIGHT can kill any lane at any score. Its no beats every yes on the desk. One analyst covers 30 wallets. Six lanes cover 51,784 and never sleep, never get bored, have no opinion about last week. It loses on some of these. The hit rate dips when a signal misfires. That's on the screen, not softened. Sizing is why the line bends up anyway. The clip is last night compressed into a few seconds. Watch the equity line, not the tickers. You could run the same build on Grok Bot. I ran this one on ASTRA. Same result, different engine. The full build is in the post below ↓

GPT-6 ASTRA BOT started the night with $120.23. It ended with $172,641.86. I gave it a wallet and one rule. It built the rest. The terminal is one screen. Orders show up on a depth radar the second they're born, float up the grid, and either fill or they don't. Wallet by wallet, live. No dashboard to configure, it drew its own. Six lanes run it. Each does exactly one thing: > DISCOVERY catches every deploy the second it lands on chain > SIGNAL scores 51,784 wallets and surfaces the ones that enter before the candle forms > PRICING checks LP depth and mint authority, rejects anything thin before it costs a cent > EXECUTION copytrades the smart money, snipes the clean mints, passes on the rest > RISK writes the size before the entry, so one misfire never outweighs a week of hits > OVERSIGHT can kill any lane at any score. Its no beats every yes on the desk. One analyst covers 30 wallets. Six lanes cover 51,784 and never sleep, never get bored, have no opinion about last week. It loses on some of these. The hit rate dips when a signal misfires. That's on the screen, not softened. Sizing is why the line bends up anyway. The clip is last night compressed into a few seconds. Watch the equity line, not the tickers. You could run the same build on Grok Bot. I ran this one on ASTRA. Same result, different engine. The full build is in the post below ↓

st1ne

79,998 views • 28 days ago

I BUILT MEMFUN. IT REMEMBERS THE DEPLOYER. ran it last night on a tape 12 mints, 50 seconds, one number per mint size comes after the old book RECALL pulls every prior ca from the creator AUDIT scores those mints LINK flags a repeat THESIS stays on the wallet, not the ticker then DOSE sizes the live mint sealed = 1 - rug/100 window is 1 only on 12-82% of the curve dose = 0.02 + 0.55 * sealed * window * (1 - creator/120) rug 72 is SKIP under 0.04 SOL is skip too two prior rugs from that wallet and EXEC holds even if dose wanted take ▹ fox board 43.9% of launches come from someone who already printed the thesis lives on the wallet the ticker dies tomorrow ▹ 3 moves 1. paste the ca, let RECALL open the old book 2. run it once on a mint that is safe to skip 3. tell EXEC to hold when the prior book is missing paper desk, no keys formula max is 0.57 SOL fully sealed, creator at 0 pump fun is the board 50s loop, 12 mints, wrap people still dump 1.5 SOL into a first-seen ticker MEMFUN names the ceiling after it checks who minted

I BUILT MEMFUN. IT REMEMBERS THE DEPLOYER. ran it last night on a tape 12 mints, 50 seconds, one number per mint size comes after the old book RECALL pulls every prior ca from the creator AUDIT scores those mints LINK flags a repeat THESIS stays on the wallet, not the ticker then DOSE sizes the live mint sealed = 1 - rug/100 window is 1 only on 12-82% of the curve dose = 0.02 + 0.55 * sealed * window * (1 - creator/120) rug 72 is SKIP under 0.04 SOL is skip too two prior rugs from that wallet and EXEC holds even if dose wanted take ▹ fox board 43.9% of launches come from someone who already printed the thesis lives on the wallet the ticker dies tomorrow ▹ 3 moves 1. paste the ca, let RECALL open the old book 2. run it once on a mint that is safe to skip 3. tell EXEC to hold when the prior book is missing paper desk, no keys formula max is 0.57 SOL fully sealed, creator at 0 pump fun is the board 50s loop, 12 mints, wrap people still dump 1.5 SOL into a first-seen ticker MEMFUN names the ceiling after it checks who minted

cryptopsihoz

15,091 views • 20 days ago

HOLY SH*T, GROK BOT BUYS A DOLLAR FOR 99 CENTS ON POLYMARKET AND NEVER LOSE THE TRADE uses the simples arbitrage formula: buy ONLY when YES + NO SCANNER watches both books at once - btc on polymarket, btc on kalshi > MATCHER links the pair and proves it is the exact same bet. pm yes ≠ kal no, one event > QUANT runs the math - sum 0.99, gross 1.0%, net 0.6% after fees, $179 a leg > RISK checks the books are deep enough to actually fill both sides > GROK holds the stopline. nothing locks until it says raise the gate > RUNNER fires both legs in one move and locks the spread. watches. links. checks. locks. the part i am proudest of is not the locks. it is the skips. when the edge is not truly risk-free, RISK shuts the gate and the bot passes. 2 passes this session. discipline over forcing a trade. most bots do not have that button, and it is exactly why they bleed. $9.90 locked in 5 mins on a $14,739 book. small on purpose while i size it up. all risk-free, all hands-off, all while i was doing anything else. that dashboard above is the live run. every light on the bridge is a real agent. full build in the article below. bookmark this.

HOLY SH*T, GROK BOT BUYS A DOLLAR FOR 99 CENTS ON POLYMARKET AND NEVER LOSE THE TRADE uses the simples arbitrage formula: buy ONLY when YES + NO SCANNER watches both books at once - btc on polymarket, btc on kalshi > MATCHER links the pair and proves it is the exact same bet. pm yes ≠ kal no, one event > QUANT runs the math - sum 0.99, gross 1.0%, net 0.6% after fees, $179 a leg > RISK checks the books are deep enough to actually fill both sides > GROK holds the stopline. nothing locks until it says raise the gate > RUNNER fires both legs in one move and locks the spread. watches. links. checks. locks. the part i am proudest of is not the locks. it is the skips. when the edge is not truly risk-free, RISK shuts the gate and the bot passes. 2 passes this session. discipline over forcing a trade. most bots do not have that button, and it is exactly why they bleed. $9.90 locked in 5 mins on a $14,739 book. small on purpose while i size it up. all risk-free, all hands-off, all while i was doing anything else. that dashboard above is the live run. every light on the bridge is a real agent. full build in the article below. bookmark this.

Oracle Boar

21,715 views • 1 month ago

This guy turned Grok Bot into an MM system and it made $1,335 a day The result is already +$65,425 PnL with only $40 per average trade while repeating the same setup 9 times every hour across BTC "Up or Down" markets Six AI agents work together as one algorithm: 1. They try to build Up + Down < 100¢ The bot accumulates both outcomes at different moments as BTC moves For example: Down at 38¢ + Up later at 56¢ = 94¢ total cost (6¢ locked on every complete set) The two entries do not need to happen at the same time 2. Order Flow tells the agents which side to accumulate next The model tracks imbalance inside the book: OBI = (B - A) / (B + A) When buying pressure shifts toward one outcome, its fair probability changes and the bot adjusts which side it wants to accumulate This trader’s Polymarket account: GoodFallen 10,322 predictions with a 50% win rate Follow this account and trade on Polymarket through this bot: Most profitable trades: $974 → $2,525 (+$1,551) $723 → $1,923 (+$1,200) $1,270 → $2,323 (+$1,053) The bot uses changes in Order Flow and BTC price to keep rebuilding the same position before resolution

This guy turned Grok Bot into an MM system and it made $1,335 a day The result is already +$65,425 PnL with only $40 per average trade while repeating the same setup 9 times every hour across BTC "Up or Down" markets Six AI agents work together as one algorithm: 1. They try to build Up + Down < 100¢ The bot accumulates both outcomes at different moments as BTC moves For example: Down at 38¢ + Up later at 56¢ = 94¢ total cost (6¢ locked on every complete set) The two entries do not need to happen at the same time 2. Order Flow tells the agents which side to accumulate next The model tracks imbalance inside the book: OBI = (B - A) / (B + A) When buying pressure shifts toward one outcome, its fair probability changes and the bot adjusts which side it wants to accumulate This trader’s Polymarket account: GoodFallen 10,322 predictions with a 50% win rate Follow this account and trade on Polymarket through this bot: Most profitable trades: $974 → $2,525 (+$1,551) $723 → $1,923 (+$1,200) $1,270 → $2,323 (+$1,053) The bot uses changes in Order Flow and BTC price to keep rebuilding the same position before resolution

Daniro

20,078 views • 1 month ago

Jamie Dimon made $39 million last year to decide who does what at JPMorgan. One AI agent on Grok Bot does that job for $300 a month, and it hires the rest of the agents itself. Stop trying to manage any of it yourself. In 2026 a swarm of AI agents runs a team better than you do. I told my chief agent one thing. Make money or I switch you off. It took $1,000 to $3,900 in 15 hours. Every fill is on chain and the address is in my profile. I never picked a trade. I never picked a team either. The agents it hired: > a scout that hunts for what is moving and where the money is going > a forensics agent that works out who is really behind the buying > a reader that watches the mood on X, and it sees every post on this app because it is Grok > a risk agent whose only power is saying no, and its no beats every score on the desk > a treasurer that holds the money rules and the kill switch > a trader that writes the exit before it writes the entry None of those were my idea. I handed out one job title and the chief filled in the rest on its own. And the swarm is different every hour. Agents appear for one job, do it, and are gone before I know they existed. A hedge fund pays millions a year for the same org chart, and almost all of that goes on salaries. Every prompt and the whole story of my Grok Bot fund is in the post below ↓ Save it before you try to run one of these by hand.

cvxv666

28,886 views • 1 month ago

I gave Elon's Grok Bot $1,000 and one rule. Grow it or I delete you. 15 hours later it is holding $3,900. Every trade of it landed on a public address. No private account and no screenshots, nothing here sits behind my word. Every cycle it: → reads the news and the filings before the rest of the market gets to them → checks who is putting money behind the story, not who is talking about it → scores the idea and sizes it against a hard risk cap → writes the exit before it takes the entry → logs the fill, the slippage and the fee separately → reads its own losing trades at night and rewrites the rules by morning It does not care what you trade. Gold, oil, a stock you inherited or a coin that launched an hour ago, the rules are the same. Setup took one evening. Create the chief of staff, hand the rest job titles the way you brief new hires, run one task on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Nothing to install past the app and nobody to wait on. Morgan Stanley pays a person six figures to do one slice of that job. Mine costs $300 a month, and it does not sleep, does not get bored, and has no opinion about last week. 15 hours in and it sits at $3,900. What do you think it has in a week? The whole build is going up soon. Every job title, every prompt, so anyone can stand one up.

I gave Elon's Grok Bot $1,000 and one rule. Grow it or I delete you. 15 hours later it is holding $3,900. Every trade of it landed on a public address. No private account and no screenshots, nothing here sits behind my word. Every cycle it: → reads the news and the filings before the rest of the market gets to them → checks who is putting money behind the story, not who is talking about it → scores the idea and sizes it against a hard risk cap → writes the exit before it takes the entry → logs the fill, the slippage and the fee separately → reads its own losing trades at night and rewrites the rules by morning It does not care what you trade. Gold, oil, a stock you inherited or a coin that launched an hour ago, the rules are the same. Setup took one evening. Create the chief of staff, hand the rest job titles the way you brief new hires, run one task on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Nothing to install past the app and nobody to wait on. Morgan Stanley pays a person six figures to do one slice of that job. Mine costs $300 a month, and it does not sleep, does not get bored, and has no opinion about last week. 15 hours in and it sits at $3,900. What do you think it has in a week? The whole build is going up soon. Every job title, every prompt, so anyone can stand one up.

cvxv666

342,243 views • 1 month ago

I SLEPT THROUGH THE BEST NIGHT MY SIX GROK BOTS HAVE HAD, $7,769 TO $8,950 the shift ran 01:05 to 08:14 UTC. i read the log in the morning like a stranger's diary > bank at open $7,769.14 > bank at close $8,950.05 > profit $1,180.91, exactly 15.2% > token side $795.42 on 7 trades, 5 green > prediction books $385.49 on 12, 9 green > my hands on it: zero eight days ago this desk was $89 and one rule: pay your own bill or i shut it down it is not a smarter model, it is a smaller job. one bot does one thing and hands it to the next 1. SCOUT kills any book with a gap under 8% 2. PRICE never chases a wall it did not watch form 3. NEWS needs two sources or the trade does not exist 4. SIZE clamps every ticket at 6% of the bank 5. RISK closes at 08:14 whether i like the number or not the entry was FLORK at 19.1M. RISK trimmed at 30.9M because the top ten holders stopped shrinking, not because a chart said so what kills these setups: → one bot doing two jobs, the day PRICE also sized tickets it cost me $434 → no hard close, a desk with no curfew gives it all back → sizing off conviction instead of a fixed percent → entries picked by the model instead of a rule you can read aloud → no log, if you cannot audit last night you are gambling → running it in a chat window instead of on a machine that never sleeps the article i quoted is the build: every role, every threshold, every exit. bookmark it and copy the desk still think this job needs a $180,000 analyst seat?

I SLEPT THROUGH THE BEST NIGHT MY SIX GROK BOTS HAVE HAD, $7,769 TO $8,950 the shift ran 01:05 to 08:14 UTC. i read the log in the morning like a stranger's diary > bank at open $7,769.14 > bank at close $8,950.05 > profit $1,180.91, exactly 15.2% > token side $795.42 on 7 trades, 5 green > prediction books $385.49 on 12, 9 green > my hands on it: zero eight days ago this desk was $89 and one rule: pay your own bill or i shut it down it is not a smarter model, it is a smaller job. one bot does one thing and hands it to the next 1. SCOUT kills any book with a gap under 8% 2. PRICE never chases a wall it did not watch form 3. NEWS needs two sources or the trade does not exist 4. SIZE clamps every ticket at 6% of the bank 5. RISK closes at 08:14 whether i like the number or not the entry was FLORK at 19.1M. RISK trimmed at 30.9M because the top ten holders stopped shrinking, not because a chart said so what kills these setups: → one bot doing two jobs, the day PRICE also sized tickets it cost me $434 → no hard close, a desk with no curfew gives it all back → sizing off conviction instead of a fixed percent → entries picked by the model instead of a rule you can read aloud → no log, if you cannot audit last night you are gambling → running it in a chat window instead of on a machine that never sleeps the article i quoted is the build: every role, every threshold, every exit. bookmark it and copy the desk still think this job needs a $180,000 analyst seat?

savip.

101,660 views • 1 month ago

I TURNED $89 INTO $30,845.78 WITH SIX GROK BOTS AND ONE F*CKING GUIDE. LAST NIGHT THEY PRINTED +31.94% WHILE I SLEPT $89 in August. $1,000 when the duel started on the 10th. $30,845.78 last night no new money went in. ever last shift printed +$7,467.14, that is +31.94% in twenty hours on one cat coin and here is the part that should piss you off. nothing here is clever → 28 positions closed, 22 green. the biggest bought 151.9M, sold 169.6M, +$1,235.77 on a $10,594 buy → the boring seven hours paid $4,222.64, the 27% pump paid $2,684.91 → four times they bought a price already running. all four red, -$407.54 → six side bets on prediction markets, +$967.14 → the coin did +25.70% on its own. the bots did +31.94% with the same coin → every number above is marked on the chart in the clip i did not build a fund. i wrote one setup guide and six Grok bots run it one bot scans, one checks, one sizes, one fills, one books the bets, one kills anything that smells like a chase that is it. that is the whole edge it works on $89 the same way it works on $30,000. the rule is a percentage, not an amount the bots predict nothing. the risk one prints the same line all night: "size the boring trade, never the runner" a signal group charges $400 a month to send an entry two hours late and never posts its losses the full setup is in the article below. every prompt, the size rule, where each bot breaks. free, no dm bookmark it before the feed buries it if you had started with $89 eight days ago, where would you be right now?

I TURNED $89 INTO $30,845.78 WITH SIX GROK BOTS AND ONE F*CKING GUIDE. LAST NIGHT THEY PRINTED +31.94% WHILE I SLEPT $89 in August. $1,000 when the duel started on the 10th. $30,845.78 last night no new money went in. ever last shift printed +$7,467.14, that is +31.94% in twenty hours on one cat coin and here is the part that should piss you off. nothing here is clever → 28 positions closed, 22 green. the biggest bought 151.9M, sold 169.6M, +$1,235.77 on a $10,594 buy → the boring seven hours paid $4,222.64, the 27% pump paid $2,684.91 → four times they bought a price already running. all four red, -$407.54 → six side bets on prediction markets, +$967.14 → the coin did +25.70% on its own. the bots did +31.94% with the same coin → every number above is marked on the chart in the clip i did not build a fund. i wrote one setup guide and six Grok bots run it one bot scans, one checks, one sizes, one fills, one books the bets, one kills anything that smells like a chase that is it. that is the whole edge it works on $89 the same way it works on $30,000. the rule is a percentage, not an amount the bots predict nothing. the risk one prints the same line all night: "size the boring trade, never the runner" a signal group charges $400 a month to send an entry two hours late and never posts its losses the full setup is in the article below. every prompt, the size rule, where each bot breaks. free, no dm bookmark it before the feed buries it if you had started with $89 eight days ago, where would you be right now?

savip.

59,292 views • 19 days ago

THIS SHOULDN'T EXIST — CLAUDE INVENTED A STRATEGY THAT READS WHERE DEALERS ARE TRAPPED AND BUILT A BOT THAT TRADES IT AUTOMATICALLY Claude didn't just assist with the code. it analyzed how market makers hedge, mapped the gamma exposure structure, and designed the entire logic — then deployed it as a GEX bot that runs live on futures here's what it built and what's on the screen right now: $QQQ NET GEX open interest map for Jul 21 '26 — every strike from $682 to $722 broken down by puts and calls → call wall at $705 — massive green bar, +40M in gamma exposure. dealers are short calls here and will sell into any push above it → max pain at $701 — the price where options expire worthless and market makers keep the most premium → put wall at $700 — dealers are short puts here and will buy every dip into it → gamma flip at $697 — below this level dealers stop supporting and start accelerating the move down Claude saw something most traders miss: these four levels aren't random. they form a cage. price bounces inside it until expiry — and every bounce is a trade so it built a bot that does exactly that price pushes toward 29,300 — the bot reads the call wall, sees resistance, marks a sell. red circle on the chart. confidence scored price pulls back to 28,850 — the bot reads the put wall, sees support, marks a buy. blue circle. confidence scored and numbered every entry is based on where dealers are forced to hedge — not where retail draws a line the DOM ladder shows volume stacking at 29,057 and 29,069 — the bot sees the same clusters and times entries into them Claude designed the strategy. the GEX bot executes it on MotiveWave. NQU6 futures. QQQ at $705.61. the call wall is right above. the put wall is right below the bot doesn't predict where price goes — it trades the cage the dealers already built and profits from every bounce inside it you're guessing where support is Claude already knows — it read the options chain and told the bot exactly where dealers have to buy and where they have to sell save this — full setup and strategy breakdown below ↓

THIS SHOULDN'T EXIST — CLAUDE INVENTED A STRATEGY THAT READS WHERE DEALERS ARE TRAPPED AND BUILT A BOT THAT TRADES IT AUTOMATICALLY Claude didn't just assist with the code. it analyzed how market makers hedge, mapped the gamma exposure structure, and designed the entire logic — then deployed it as a GEX bot that runs live on futures here's what it built and what's on the screen right now: $QQQ NET GEX open interest map for Jul 21 '26 — every strike from $682 to $722 broken down by puts and calls → call wall at $705 — massive green bar, +40M in gamma exposure. dealers are short calls here and will sell into any push above it → max pain at $701 — the price where options expire worthless and market makers keep the most premium → put wall at $700 — dealers are short puts here and will buy every dip into it → gamma flip at $697 — below this level dealers stop supporting and start accelerating the move down Claude saw something most traders miss: these four levels aren't random. they form a cage. price bounces inside it until expiry — and every bounce is a trade so it built a bot that does exactly that price pushes toward 29,300 — the bot reads the call wall, sees resistance, marks a sell. red circle on the chart. confidence scored price pulls back to 28,850 — the bot reads the put wall, sees support, marks a buy. blue circle. confidence scored and numbered every entry is based on where dealers are forced to hedge — not where retail draws a line the DOM ladder shows volume stacking at 29,057 and 29,069 — the bot sees the same clusters and times entries into them Claude designed the strategy. the GEX bot executes it on MotiveWave. NQU6 futures. QQQ at $705.61. the call wall is right above. the put wall is right below the bot doesn't predict where price goes — it trades the cage the dealers already built and profits from every bounce inside it you're guessing where support is Claude already knows — it read the options chain and told the bot exactly where dealers have to buy and where they have to sell save this — full setup and strategy breakdown below ↓

INSIDER

29,416 views • 28 days ago

THIS WALLET STACKED $230K ON BTC UP/DOWN BETS. THE BLUEPRINT TO AUTOMATE THE SAME EDGE WITH CLAUDE The wallet is $230K all-time, every position a Bitcoin or Ethereum Up or Down market It never guesses direction. It enters only when the math and the market disagree THE STRATEGY: BTC moves are not fully random. When the market enters a committed directional state, continuation is measurable. That is Markov persistence Entry signal: > Δ = p̂ − q ≥ ε Model probability minus market price. Enter only on a 5% gap or more Persistence filter: > p(j*,j*) ≥ 0.87 Only trade states with 0.87 persistence or higher. Below that, skip. This is what holds the win rate above 65% with zero directional guessing Payout: > r = (1 − q) / q At q = 0.647 that is +54.5% a win. At q = 0.441, +126.7%. Lower entry price, bigger asymmetry Sizing: > f* = p − (1−p)/b Kelly. At p = 0.87, b = 0.647, f* ≈ 0.71. Size to the edge, never to gut HOW TO BUILD IT WITH CLAUDE: What separates this from a static bot: Claude reads its own trade journal every night and rewrites its own thresholds 1. Take an open-source Polymarket bot repo as your base logic. Feed it to Claude and have it migrate to CLOB v2: py_clob_client_v2, Safe wallet support, fee-aware evaluation 2. Hard-code the filters. Enter only when Δ ≥ 0.05 and p(j*,j*) ≥ 0.87. Apply Kelly on every fill. 3. Run DRY_RUN first. Log every signal, entry price, Markov state, and simulated P/L. No real money until the numbers hold for days 4. The nightly loop. Claude reads the journal, finds which persistence states actually won, adjusts MIN_PROB and MIN_EDGE, ships tomorrow's rules. The agent is sharper after 50 to 100 trades THE SETUP: Claude Opus as the brain. An open-source repo as the starting logic. A Polygon wallet with $50 to $100. Telegram for the morning report Start at $1 to $2 per trade while it learns. Scale only when the dry runs and the live fills line up 17,000 trades compound a thin edge into six figures. The model finds the edge. The nightly loop keeps it sharp Bookmark before you point a bot at your first window

THIS WALLET STACKED $230K ON BTC UP/DOWN BETS. THE BLUEPRINT TO AUTOMATE THE SAME EDGE WITH CLAUDE The wallet is $230K all-time, every position a Bitcoin or Ethereum Up or Down market It never guesses direction. It enters only when the math and the market disagree THE STRATEGY: BTC moves are not fully random. When the market enters a committed directional state, continuation is measurable. That is Markov persistence Entry signal: > Δ = p̂ − q ≥ ε Model probability minus market price. Enter only on a 5% gap or more Persistence filter: > p(j,j) ≥ 0.87 Only trade states with 0.87 persistence or higher. Below that, skip. This is what holds the win rate above 65% with zero directional guessing Payout: > r = (1 − q) / q At q = 0.647 that is +54.5% a win. At q = 0.441, +126.7%. Lower entry price, bigger asymmetry Sizing: > f* = p − (1−p)/b Kelly. At p = 0.87, b = 0.647, f* ≈ 0.71. Size to the edge, never to gut HOW TO BUILD IT WITH CLAUDE: What separates this from a static bot: Claude reads its own trade journal every night and rewrites its own thresholds 1. Take an open-source Polymarket bot repo as your base logic. Feed it to Claude and have it migrate to CLOB v2: py_clob_client_v2, Safe wallet support, fee-aware evaluation 2. Hard-code the filters. Enter only when Δ ≥ 0.05 and p(j,j) ≥ 0.87. Apply Kelly on every fill. 3. Run DRY_RUN first. Log every signal, entry price, Markov state, and simulated P/L. No real money until the numbers hold for days 4. The nightly loop. Claude reads the journal, finds which persistence states actually won, adjusts MIN_PROB and MIN_EDGE, ships tomorrow's rules. The agent is sharper after 50 to 100 trades THE SETUP: Claude Opus as the brain. An open-source repo as the starting logic. A Polygon wallet with $50 to $100. Telegram for the morning report Start at $1 to $2 per trade while it learns. Scale only when the dry runs and the live fills line up 17,000 trades compound a thin edge into six figures. The model finds the edge. The nightly loop keeps it sharp Bookmark before you point a bot at your first window

Yarchi

22,966 views • 4 months ago

MY GROK BOT KEPT CUTTING ITS OWN LEVERAGE. $728 → $12,932 IN 18 HOURS The first trade scared me. 25x on ETH, on an account with barely anything in it. Then I didn't touch it for 18 hours. It trades long perps on five coins and picks the leverage for every trade based on what the account is worth at that moment. Small account, aggressive. Bigger account, calmer. - ETH at 25x, first take-profit - SUI at 11x, the fattest fill of the session - BTC at 9x - AVAX at 3x - SOL at 4x, the last one That's the part that got me. Most people go bigger after a win. My bot went the other way, the bigger the balance got, the less leverage it wanted. Every take-profit shows its own math. SUI moved 15.8%, at 11x that's 173.8% on $1,533 of margin. After $93 in fees, $2,570 landed in the balance. I made the whole terminal look like Apple shipped it. When a take-profit hits, the front card flips over like a receipt: margin, entry, exit, fees, net. You can redo every one on a phone calculator. The five big fills are only about 58% of the profit. The rest came from small trades inbetween that I barely noticed. And it wasn't a clean staircase, there were a few real dips where the ring stalled and my thumb was hovering over the off switch. 25x and 11x are my personal desk, not a signal. Don't copy the sizing. Hour 18. Every step on the ladder green, ring stopped a bit short of the $14,000 goal. Guess that's tomorrow's problem.

MY GROK BOT KEPT CUTTING ITS OWN LEVERAGE. $728 → $12,932 IN 18 HOURS The first trade scared me. 25x on ETH, on an account with barely anything in it. Then I didn't touch it for 18 hours. It trades long perps on five coins and picks the leverage for every trade based on what the account is worth at that moment. Small account, aggressive. Bigger account, calmer. - ETH at 25x, first take-profit - SUI at 11x, the fattest fill of the session - BTC at 9x - AVAX at 3x - SOL at 4x, the last one That's the part that got me. Most people go bigger after a win. My bot went the other way, the bigger the balance got, the less leverage it wanted. Every take-profit shows its own math. SUI moved 15.8%, at 11x that's 173.8% on $1,533 of margin. After $93 in fees, $2,570 landed in the balance. I made the whole terminal look like Apple shipped it. When a take-profit hits, the front card flips over like a receipt: margin, entry, exit, fees, net. You can redo every one on a phone calculator. The five big fills are only about 58% of the profit. The rest came from small trades inbetween that I barely noticed. And it wasn't a clean staircase, there were a few real dips where the ring stalled and my thumb was hovering over the off switch. 25x and 11x are my personal desk, not a signal. Don't copy the sizing. Hour 18. Every step on the ladder green, ring stopped a bit short of the $14,000 goal. Guess that's tomorrow's problem.

tenzo

29,271 views • 1 day ago

0.3 SOL TO 1.5 SOL IN ONE MINUTE. SPLIT IS COOKING ON most still dump full size on tick zero pray on candle one and call it edge one mint, one bag, hope it prints SPLIT said nah staggered ladder on the live tape split ledger opens a book per mint 3 micro-legs, not one all-in print t0 takes 50% +8s takes 30% +25s takes the last 20% size falls each step on purpose green fills add sol to the book red flies pull the book down kill on any leg aborts the rest no riding a dead ladder into a rug gate still checks sealed surface curve window 12-82 or it skips wins and cuts stay on the same board net tracked on a 60s window one minute live 0.3 in → 1.5 out target pace ~2 SOL / min book was printing past that fr 5x on the clock, not a screenshot fantasy DOSE is one capsule CORE locks the mint to orbit RUBY vetoes the dark facet SPLIT is the anti all-in on solana not a vibe bot not a wrapper a sizing runtime on cryptopsihoz desk, real sol, live tape ▹ giveaway 1 SOL split between 5 winners tag 3 friends under this post repost + follow to enter deadline 24h from this post winners picked after the clock hits quietly cooking edge is open

0.3 SOL TO 1.5 SOL IN ONE MINUTE. SPLIT IS COOKING ON most still dump full size on tick zero pray on candle one and call it edge one mint, one bag, hope it prints SPLIT said nah staggered ladder on the live tape split ledger opens a book per mint 3 micro-legs, not one all-in print t0 takes 50% +8s takes 30% +25s takes the last 20% size falls each step on purpose green fills add sol to the book red flies pull the book down kill on any leg aborts the rest no riding a dead ladder into a rug gate still checks sealed surface curve window 12-82 or it skips wins and cuts stay on the same board net tracked on a 60s window one minute live 0.3 in → 1.5 out target pace ~2 SOL / min book was printing past that fr 5x on the clock, not a screenshot fantasy DOSE is one capsule CORE locks the mint to orbit RUBY vetoes the dark facet SPLIT is the anti all-in on solana not a vibe bot not a wrapper a sizing runtime on cryptopsihoz desk, real sol, live tape ▹ giveaway 1 SOL split between 5 winners tag 3 friends under this post repost + follow to enter deadline 24h from this post winners picked after the clock hits quietly cooking edge is open

cryptopsihoz

23,674 views • 14 days ago

I gave Elon's Grok Bot $60 and one rule: "The day you cannot pay your own subscription is the day I unplug you". 48 hours in it is sitting on $4,412 and it already paid the bill. Autonomous trading agent on Polymarket, running on its own cloud box with its own browser and terminal. I did not write a line of code and I did not watch it trade. Every 15 minutes it: -> Pulls every market that resolves inside 24 hours. -> Reads live X sentiment, and it is Grok, so it sees every post on this app before the price moves. -> Prices each market itself and only flags a gap above 7%. -> Sizes on the gap, never above 5% of the bankroll. -> Executes in its own browser, nobody approves anything. -> Covers its own $200 subscription straight out of profits. Balance hits $0, subscription gets cancelled, it is gone for good. Hour 11 it was at $9 -> runway one day. It dumped every politics position and switched to same day baseball totals, front-running lineup cards before the market repriced. It rewrote its own strategy to not die. Setup was one evening: spin up the bot, run one trade in front of it, put it on a timer, connect Telegram with no VPS, no API keys and no dev on call. Last spring a freelancer took $2,500 for something like this -> it made $410 and died on a rate limit. Grok Bot did in one evening what $2,500 could not. $60 -> $4,412 in 48 hours. What is it sitting at by Sunday?

I gave Elon's Grok Bot $60 and one rule: "The day you cannot pay your own subscription is the day I unplug you". 48 hours in it is sitting on $4,412 and it already paid the bill. Autonomous trading agent on Polymarket, running on its own cloud box with its own browser and terminal. I did not write a line of code and I did not watch it trade. Every 15 minutes it: -> Pulls every market that resolves inside 24 hours. -> Reads live X sentiment, and it is Grok, so it sees every post on this app before the price moves. -> Prices each market itself and only flags a gap above 7%. -> Sizes on the gap, never above 5% of the bankroll. -> Executes in its own browser, nobody approves anything. -> Covers its own $200 subscription straight out of profits. Balance hits $0, subscription gets cancelled, it is gone for good. Hour 11 it was at $9 -> runway one day. It dumped every politics position and switched to same day baseball totals, front-running lineup cards before the market repriced. It rewrote its own strategy to not die. Setup was one evening: spin up the bot, run one trade in front of it, put it on a timer, connect Telegram with no VPS, no API keys and no dev on call. Last spring a freelancer took $2,500 for something like this -> it made $410 and died on a rate limit. Grok Bot did in one evening what $2,500 could not. $60 -> $4,412 in 48 hours. What is it sitting at by Sunday?

slash1s

190,860 views • 1 month ago

Know what to do before the market forces you to decide. 1. Before the trade — Should I trade? Is it a proven setup from your playbook? Does the market environment fit? Does the reward justify the risk? Do you have a clear invalidation level and the correct position size? Are you following your system, or do you just want action? If these don't align, pass. 2. At entry — What am I risking? Know your entry, stop, position size, initial $ risk, % of capital at risk, and your target or exit method. The chart determines the stop. The stop determines the position size. 3. After entry — Has anything actually changed? Is the setup still valid? Has your predetermined exit been reached? Has price action materially changed? Are you reacting to the chart or to your P&L? If nothing important has changed, don't invent a new decision. 4. When losing — Exit or hold? Hold only while your thesis and predefined risk remain valid. Exit when the stop is triggered, the setup is invalidated, market behavior violates your entry reason, or your risk limit is reached. Never turn a planned trade into an unplanned investment. 5. When winning — Exit or hold? Has the target been reached? Has the trailing stop triggered? Has the trend or setup weakened? Is there actual evidence to exit, or are you afraid of giving back profit? Let your exit rules manage the winner, not your emotions. 6. After the trade — What did I learn? Record the setup, entry, exit, risk, result in R, rule adherence, mistakes, a screenshot, and one lesson. Then separate two questions: did the strategy work, and did you execute it correctly? A losing trade can still be good execution. A winning trade can still involve bad execution. Make your important trading decisions before money is influencing your emotions.

Know what to do before the market forces you to decide. 1. Before the trade — Should I trade? Is it a proven setup from your playbook? Does the market environment fit? Does the reward justify the risk? Do you have a clear invalidation level and the correct position size? Are you following your system, or do you just want action? If these don't align, pass. 2. At entry — What am I risking? Know your entry, stop, position size, initial $ risk, % of capital at risk, and your target or exit method. The chart determines the stop. The stop determines the position size. 3. After entry — Has anything actually changed? Is the setup still valid? Has your predetermined exit been reached? Has price action materially changed? Are you reacting to the chart or to your P&L? If nothing important has changed, don't invent a new decision. 4. When losing — Exit or hold? Hold only while your thesis and predefined risk remain valid. Exit when the stop is triggered, the setup is invalidated, market behavior violates your entry reason, or your risk limit is reached. Never turn a planned trade into an unplanned investment. 5. When winning — Exit or hold? Has the target been reached? Has the trailing stop triggered? Has the trend or setup weakened? Is there actual evidence to exit, or are you afraid of giving back profit? Let your exit rules manage the winner, not your emotions. 6. After the trade — What did I learn? Record the setup, entry, exit, risk, result in R, rule adherence, mistakes, a screenshot, and one lesson. Then separate two questions: did the strategy work, and did you execute it correctly? A losing trade can still be good execution. A winning trade can still involve bad execution. Make your important trading decisions before money is influencing your emotions.

Scott Redler

28,210 views • 13 days ago

imagine Elon opens his timeline and sees this one the first Grok Bot trading fully on its own, on chain, out of a public wallet anyone can open and audit not a bot that posts calls. one that does the whole job: > traces where wallets got their funding, so five buyers that are really one guy get labeled as one guy > keeps a running scorecard on every caller on this app, who moves price and who shows up after the move > reads mention velocity straight off X, the one feed nobody outside xAI has > checks mint authority, freeze authority, LP lock and sell tax before it is allowed to want anything > writes its exit before it takes the entry, every single time > reads its own losing trades at night and rewrites its own rules by morning and then the part that makes it different from every trading bot ever posted here. it pays its own bills. credits, API calls, all of it, out of what it earns. whatever is left goes to $CVXV666 holders through a contract, not through my word. an AI that funds itself, fixes itself, and answers to a wallet anybody can watch. if it works, that is the first working piece of an on-chain economy where the machine earns its own keep. he shipped the bot. nobody has shown him one that pays for itself yet. that part is on us.

imagine Elon opens his timeline and sees this one the first Grok Bot trading fully on its own, on chain, out of a public wallet anyone can open and audit not a bot that posts calls. one that does the whole job: > traces where wallets got their funding, so five buyers that are really one guy get labeled as one guy > keeps a running scorecard on every caller on this app, who moves price and who shows up after the move > reads mention velocity straight off X, the one feed nobody outside xAI has > checks mint authority, freeze authority, LP lock and sell tax before it is allowed to want anything > writes its exit before it takes the entry, every single time > reads its own losing trades at night and rewrites its own rules by morning and then the part that makes it different from every trading bot ever posted here. it pays its own bills. credits, API calls, all of it, out of what it earns. whatever is left goes to $CVXV666 holders through a contract, not through my word. an AI that funds itself, fixes itself, and answers to a wallet anybody can watch. if it works, that is the first working piece of an on-chain economy where the machine earns its own keep. he shipped the bot. nobody has shown him one that pays for itself yet. that part is on us.

cvxv666

27,403 views • 1 month ago

I GAVE MY GROK BOT $1,480 AND ONE RULE: NEVER GET CLOSE TO LIQUIDATION $1,480 → $9,260. One day. Highest leverage it touched was 6x. Every perps blowup I've seen looks the same. Liquidation price right under the entry, one normal wick, account gone. So my bot doesnt predict anything. It trades five coins at 4-6x, only in the direction the day is already moving, and closes at a take-profit set before the entry. - Never trades against the day's trend - Exit is set before the entry - 4-6x max, no "just this once" - Five big exits made a bit over half the profit - Around 30 small closes made the rest The math is almost boring. SUI moved 17.7% on the day, at 4x that's 70.8% on the margin. No moonshot, just a normal day times four. What I actually watched was the risk rail. Liquidation on the left, target on the right, a dot crawling between them. The red zone never got anywhere near the dot. BTC was the one I kept staring at. Smallest move, highest leverage, tightest buffer of the five. It still closed green, and when the last card flew off the stack the red zone was still sitting on the far left.

I GAVE MY GROK BOT $1,480 AND ONE RULE: NEVER GET CLOSE TO LIQUIDATION $1,480 → $9,260. One day. Highest leverage it touched was 6x. Every perps blowup I've seen looks the same. Liquidation price right under the entry, one normal wick, account gone. So my bot doesnt predict anything. It trades five coins at 4-6x, only in the direction the day is already moving, and closes at a take-profit set before the entry. - Never trades against the day's trend - Exit is set before the entry - 4-6x max, no "just this once" - Five big exits made a bit over half the profit - Around 30 small closes made the rest The math is almost boring. SUI moved 17.7% on the day, at 4x that's 70.8% on the margin. No moonshot, just a normal day times four. What I actually watched was the risk rail. Liquidation on the left, target on the right, a dot crawling between them. The red zone never got anywhere near the dot. BTC was the one I kept staring at. Smallest move, highest leverage, tightest buffer of the five. It still closed green, and when the last card flew off the stack the red zone was still sitting on the far left.

tenzo

35,959 views • 2 days ago

🚨 nasa you have to see this 50 Grok Bot agents rebuilt one of your own planets overnight for $200, and it looks better than anything in the archive TRAPPIST-1 e, catalogued in 2017, never once photographed: 0.92 Earth radii, 0.692 Earth masses, a year that lasts 6.101 days, 249 kelvin, orbiting 0.02925 AU from a 2566 kelvin red dwarf, 40 light years out, 7 worlds in the system. every figure burned into that panel came out of NASA's exoplanet archive over one public url and carries its own citation. the cities are mine and the frame says so turns out the build is five moves, and none of them are the ones people demo: 1. pull the data before a single frame exists. the archive answers a plain GET at takes sql, returns csv across all 6,000 confirmed planets. hand one bot that url and it stops inventing numbers forever 2. shard by shot, not by task. a bot drives one screen at a time, so speed comes from more bots and never from a smarter one. one bot per shot, all of them on their own cloud machines at once 3. keep every recorded skill under 10 minutes, because that is the hard cap. split it: "log in and start the render" is one skill, "check it and download it" is a second on a 5 minute schedule. a long job is a chain of short skills, not one long recording 4. do not let bots message each other to coordinate. they loop, and the loop quietly eats your quota. give them one shared folder and have each drop a file when its shot lands 5. run the last bot in a clean context holding the source csv and nothing else, and make it check every number on the panel against the row it came from honest ceiling: 10 minutes per recording and one screen per bot, so 50 of them buys width and not speed bookmark this. all 50 prompts go up in 24 hours ↓

🚨 nasa you have to see this 50 Grok Bot agents rebuilt one of your own planets overnight for $200, and it looks better than anything in the archive TRAPPIST-1 e, catalogued in 2017, never once photographed: 0.92 Earth radii, 0.692 Earth masses, a year that lasts 6.101 days, 249 kelvin, orbiting 0.02925 AU from a 2566 kelvin red dwarf, 40 light years out, 7 worlds in the system. every figure burned into that panel came out of NASA's exoplanet archive over one public url and carries its own citation. the cities are mine and the frame says so turns out the build is five moves, and none of them are the ones people demo: 1. pull the data before a single frame exists. the archive answers a plain GET at takes sql, returns csv across all 6,000 confirmed planets. hand one bot that url and it stops inventing numbers forever 2. shard by shot, not by task. a bot drives one screen at a time, so speed comes from more bots and never from a smarter one. one bot per shot, all of them on their own cloud machines at once 3. keep every recorded skill under 10 minutes, because that is the hard cap. split it: "log in and start the render" is one skill, "check it and download it" is a second on a 5 minute schedule. a long job is a chain of short skills, not one long recording 4. do not let bots message each other to coordinate. they loop, and the loop quietly eats your quota. give them one shared folder and have each drop a file when its shot lands 5. run the last bot in a clean context holding the source csv and nothing else, and make it check every number on the panel against the row it came from honest ceiling: 10 minutes per recording and one screen per bot, so 50 of them buys width and not speed bookmark this. all 50 prompts go up in 24 hours ↓

Argona

37,258 views • 1 month ago