Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

imagine Elon opens his timeline and sees this one the first Grok Bot trading fully on its own, on chain, out of a public wallet anyone can open and audit not a bot that posts calls. one that does the whole job: > traces where wallets got their funding,...

27,403 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 35

Фото профиля DOUBLE ESPRESSOO
DOUBLE ESPRESSOO1 месяц назад

Think @elon wil love this how you use his @bot @xai

Фото профиля PhellowofPhkry 🐂 🐈
PhellowofPhkry 🐂 🐈1 месяц назад

@elonmusk , show him some love

Фото профиля nauxiousss
nauxiousss1 месяц назад

@elonmusk

Фото профиля Ridark
Ridark1 месяц назад

Your terminal is really energetic and shows real uniqueness

Фото профиля nauxiousss
nauxiousss1 месяц назад

i dont get it, someone pls tell me what im missing, is this larp tech or what ? how is this only at 180k ?

Фото профиля Valentin
Valentin1 месяц назад

@elonmusk check it right now

Фото профиля elle
elle1 месяц назад

if this works, crypto history is about to change!! classic trading is dying

Фото профиля Caben
Caben1 месяц назад

does it actually trade in profit though ?

Фото профиля 0xtheo
0xtheo1 месяц назад

This is where it gets interesting. Not “AI gives trading calls” but “AI has a wallet, pays its own costs and has to survive on its own PnL.” Much harder to fake.

Фото профиля shmidt
shmidt1 месяц назад

this is actually the first one that could work, bro

Фото профиля hira
hira1 месяц назад

bots funding bots now huh

Фото профиля Tes Tes
Tes Tes1 месяц назад

Have you tried sending to holders yet?

Фото профиля Lorenzo2K
Lorenzo2K1 месяц назад

grok office?

Фото профиля Blaz :)
Blaz :)1 месяц назад

great tech

Фото профиля B Franklin
B Franklin1 месяц назад

@elonmusk

Фото профиля Moysha
Moysha1 месяц назад

Imagine Elon actually seeing thi

Фото профиля StormFX
StormFX1 месяц назад

Looks like Elon just found his Grok Bot in real life - and he already knows who bought it 💸

Фото профиля 0xMorpheus
0xMorpheus1 месяц назад

this is pretty cool @elonmusk

Фото профиля Bradly 🩸
Bradly 🩸1 месяц назад

@antpalkin when will it be fully functional / live so we can take a look ourselves. If you pull this off gennnnyyyy. Would just like a bit more info, maybe even post a roadmap with a progression sheet so we can know when / what to expect next. Thanks!

Фото профиля 100xdreww
100xdreww1 месяц назад

@elonmusk

Фото профиля Yaping 🐂🀄️
Yaping 🐂🀄️1 месяц назад

@blknoiz06 you created a big bull run

Фото профиля 韭菜
韭菜1 месяц назад

yo @antpalkin

Фото профиля Gato
Gato1 месяц назад

@elonmusk

Фото профиля MR CBFW
MR CBFW1 месяц назад

Where can I find this ?

Фото профиля ConclaviosM3
ConclaviosM31 месяц назад

@zinceth

Фото профиля 韭菜
韭菜1 месяц назад

@blknoiz06 check it out

Фото профиля John Willington
John Willington1 месяц назад

@elonmusk just look at this!! Grok bot fully automated trading agent with real world gains like what ?!

Фото профиля Mr. Alex
Mr. Alex1 месяц назад

solana:GXdbB581sDfMuhwJsQUksbvhj9yPTosaxhaKuHiTpump

Фото профиля Project Mole
Project Mole1 месяц назад

Yooo this is sick! can you check dm had a question about this bro

Фото профиля jinx
jinx1 месяц назад

@elonmusk

Фото профиля WINNing_CHAD💵
WINNing_CHAD💵1 месяц назад

solana:C3bajJW843KN9Uu441JkXN7zVMs4VM2HvdAGyGiBpump C3bajJW843KN9Uu441JkXN7zVMs4VM2HvdAGyGiBpump

Фото профиля Beşiktaş
Beşiktaş1 месяц назад

@elonmusk

Фото профиля j
j1 месяц назад

Where id the proof can we see it live?

Фото профиля Crescent
Crescent1 месяц назад

@elonmusk

Фото профиля MENACE
MENACE1 месяц назад

and the coin is going viral solana:C3bajJW843KN9Uu441JkXN7zVMs4VM2HvdAGyGiBpump

Похожие видео

Grok Bot by Elon Musk is about to become the first AI agent trading on chain in public. One wallet, $1,000 in it, and an address anyone can open. It built me a memecoin research desk and then automated itself out of my hands. 7 agents, no people, running while i sleep and rewriting their own rules by morning. > SCOUT sits on pumpfun and catches every deploy the second it lands > HYPE reads mention velocity straight off X, the feed nobody outside xAI gets > CHATTER lives in the pump and fomo comment rooms and scores every caller, who moves price and who shows up after the move > FORENSICS traces the funding chains, so five buyers that are really one guy get labeled as one guy > SAFETY runs the CA check before the desk is allowed to want anything, mint authority, freeze authority, LP lock, sell tax > TRADER writes the exit before it takes the entry, every single time Chief of Staff never trades. It reads the five briefs, scores the call and sizes it. SAFETY can kill any of them at any score, and a kill does not get appealed. Every night it reads its own losing trades and rewrites the scoring rules by morning. I see the diff. I do not write it. No screenshots, no PnL flex out of a private account. One address, every fill, every mistake, in public. It will lose money on some of these, and it will be on chain inside the same minute. I am not going to soften it later. A desk like this used to mean huge salaries, an office and somebody watching the screens at 3am. Mine is a subscription and a wallet. The address goes live by 22:00 UTC. Thank you to the xAI team for the belief and the unlimited Grok Bot tier. You handed me the whole thing and never once asked what I was going to do with it. Thank you to everyone here. This is happening because you kept telling me to stop planning it. I think we are about to run the boldest experiment modern finance has ever been allowed to watch live. God bless us.

cvxv666

95,530 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

BlackRock runs on 20,000 people. Elon's Grok Bot runs the same shape for $300 a month, and it hires its own staff. You do not get an assistant. You get a company that hires. It does not throw ten agents at your problem and hand you the pile. It makes one agent that makes 10, and those ten make a 100. > LAYER ONE is one agent, the chief of staff, and it never touches the market > LAYER TWO is six desk heads, one job each, every one on its own computer with its own logins > LAYER THREE is whatever those six decide they need, spun up on the spot and shut down when the work is done Nobody writes a task list. You hand out job titles and the org fills itself in underneath. The swarm is never the same twice. Agents get spun up for one job, finish it, and are gone before I ever read their names. Not one of them sees the whole picture. The answer only exists after they hand off to each other. Wall Street cannot copy that. You cannot hire a hundred people for eleven minutes. BlackRock holds that shape together with a risk system called Aladdin. Mine holds it together with one agent that is only allowed to say no. I gave it $1,000 and told it to grow the money or get deleted. 15 hours later it was holding $3,900, on an address anyone can open and read. I was asleep for most of it, and I have still not written a line of code. The whole thing runs with my laptop shut, because none of it lives on my laptop. Setup is one evening. Create the chief, hand out the titles, run one trade on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Ten years ago a machine this shape had its name on a tower. Mine has a name I typed into a box. Save this while the whole thing still fits on one screen.

cvxv666

45,488 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

whoever leaked this has bigger balls than sense someone in the Grok Bot beta posted one night of receipts and deleted them an hour later: 6 agents, 1,284 analysis jobs between midnight and 6am, total bill $4.98. same account, a second bot sent 100 outreach messages on X and came back with 41 signups, and a third closed 3 deals and now pays for its own upgrades out of what it earns i gave one of mine a research brief first and watched it hire four agents for the job and fire three of them by lunch, already past the point where i'd have hired a human this is the one-employee company, the layer where the human owns and the agents do everything else, and it installs into the Grok Bot sub you already pay for: - give one bot the hiring seat and nothing else: it spins up agents per task and kills them when the task closes, so the roster is never bigger than tonight's work - price the night before you scale it: 1,284 jobs for $4.98 is the number to beat, and a routine that can't come in under a junior's hourly rate does not get a schedule - put outreach on its own agent with a daily cap: 100 messages and 41 signups is what a clean list does, a dirty one gets the account banned by message 30 - let a bot spend only through a one-time card with a hard limit, the official client already supports it, so the worst night costs the card's ceiling and nothing else - keep one closer bot funding its own upgrades: if it can't pay for its next tool out of what it closed, it isn't a business, it's a demo turns out the roster does not travel: the biggest win came off a research desk where the brain fired agents daily, and the worst blowup off a sales bot that kept every hire on forever my position, and it is the arguable one: this is a beta, and a beta is already running companies with one human inside. the finished product doesn't make that more true, it makes it cheaper bookmark this, the three moves that set up the hiring seat, the card limit and the first paying agent are in the post below ↓

Argona

43,764 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

elon musk started with 7 grok agents. by morning each had spawned somewhere between 80 and 900 more on its own, and no one had told them to multiply. openai and anthropic each sell you one agent that sits still for $400. this whole self-building swarm runs for $5 the swarm above is that overnight run, seven seeds that turned into thousands, every one of them working a slice of the same job with nobody at the keyboard here is the exact setup, and it costs nothing on top of a $5 key: -> spin up one grok agent and give it a standing order instead of a prompt: own a boring niche people search every day -> it reads x and reddit complaints in real time and picks the one nobody wants but everybody googles, because it is grok and it sees the whole app -> when the work outgrows it, it spawns its own helpers, 80 to 900 of them, and splits the site between them -> they build it on their own machines and ship 3 to 6 useful pages a night, on a routine you set once -> the swarm writes, negotiates and closes its own affiliate and referral deals by email, in your name, at 3am -> telegram sends you the money report and you never open the site -> month one is traffic, month three the first $237 lands, and it does not stop after that the whole time, opus 5 and gpt-5.6 are still sitting frozen, waiting for you to type the next message. one is a swarm that builds its own workforce and its own income while you sleep, the other is a $200 chat you have to drive by hand drop your $400/mo stack to $5, and bookmark this before someone's swarm spawns another 600 pages into the niche you would have owned. the full playbook is in the article below

starmex

98,444 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Orchestrators vs. Graphs, clearly explained! orchestrators are great, and everyone builds one first. here is the ceiling: an orchestrator sits above the work and routes every message. five agents report to it. it reads all five. it decides what each one does next, and reads all five replies. that is ten trips through one context, and by the fifth agent that context has read four reports, five instructions and its own reasoning about all of them. Graph engineering fixes this by removing the seat: not a better router, but no router at all. you need both, and here is the sentence that resolves the whole confusion: an orchestrator sits above the work and holds all of it. a graph is the shape of the work, and holds none of it. ↳ above the work: one context that has to see everything before anything ships ↳ inside the work: a splitter that hands out and lets go, and a merge that reads nothing Prompts → Context → Harness → Loops → Graphs the coordination did not disappear. it moved into the edges, where it costs nothing and cannot get tired. the trick is noticing what you actually built. if one node has to see every result before the run can finish, you did not remove the bottleneck. you hired it, gave it the longest context in the system, and made it the thing you were counting on to stay sharp. one thing to know before you scale it. an orchestrator degrades in the one way nothing catches. ↳ it does not crash, time out or return an error. it stays up and keeps routing ↳ it just starts routing worse, somewhere around the fifth report, and every downstream agent does exactly what it was told that last one catches careful people. you can have perfect isolation on every worker and still have one window quietly drifting at the top, and the traces will all look clean because each worker did its job. and the one that eats whole nights: the merge is where this shows up first. ranking five findings is not judgment, it is a sort. if a model is doing it, you are paying a model to read five reports so it can put them in an order that three lines of code would have got right, and now that model has read everything too. below i have quoted my full guide on graph engineering. it covers the three topologies, the verifier patterns, and where the gate should actually open. save this and read it below ↓

Hanako

44,226 просмотров • 25 дней назад