Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

White Moms are replacing their weak Whiteboy sons with powerful BBC // #bbc #whiteboysex #trans #caption #sissy #sissycaption #cuck #joi #wbbd #sph

34,533 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The fact that Rap was a Psyop has been bugging me.. so I went back and listened to all the number one hits of 1999, almost all of which I'd never heard before. And now? Now I don't think just Rap was a psyop.. Now I think almost all popular "Black" music was. But Why? Well.. Think of it like the "Swifting" of music. It's not just all vapid and all interchangeable, in a dreamy or hypnotic quality.. but it always presents the exact same message. Like late night talk show hosts always have the exact same message. It doesn't matter who the artist is,it doesn't even matter what song they're singing.. inexorably it will politically and ideologically walk in lockstep. I'm curious to know if you can spot what the message is. Listen to the songs, really listen to them. The core message is: Black men are presented as strong, powerful, desirable. White men are weak and fragile simps. Consider, there's TWO songs by White women about just loving their men... (neither of which actually hit number 1 unlike what the video says) the rest are thinly veiled encouragements to go have sex or go out of their way to find fault with their men. "That don't impress me much." Conversely, all the Black/Latina women (with two exceptions (both involving money, interestingly enough) love their men to no end and aren't shy about saying so. Alternatively the White men positively gush over women... or whine about how hard life is. But they are never presented as strong, virile, or dominant. But the Black men are... and the Latino men are presented as sexy and fun lovers. Tell me you see it too.. I can't be the only one.

BLACK DUMPLING™

303,424 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

In the topical immigration debates taking place in South Africa, many ignorant people have been manipulated by politicians and individuals with political ambitions who are exploiting that ignorance for their own agendas. But not everyone is ignorant to the real issues at the heart of the crisis. Some voices within South African society, including from the white community, are now speaking openly and calling things for what they are. The reality is that immigration in South Africa is not simply about foreigners. It is also about failed governance across the region, corruption, unemployment, economic collapse, weak border management, and political leaders who refuse to confront the root causes driving migration. Increasingly, some South Africans are beginning to recognise that blaming migrants alone will not solve the deeper structural problems affecting the country. But who cares about facts and accurate narratives when all that is needed are emotions to drive people into doing things they have been wrongly told will mitigate their suffering and the abject poverty in which they live? The tragedy of populist politics is that it feeds on desperation, not truth. People who are struggling economically become easy targets for manipulation, especially when they are constantly told that vulnerable groups, rather than failed leadership and corruption, are responsible for their hardships. Who cares about all the corruption coming out of the Madlanga Commission? Who cares that hospitals are being looted while billions that should have been used for healthcare, schools, roads, housing, and service delivery are instead being squandered on Ferraris and lavish lifestyles for politically connected elites? Nobody cares about those facts. The public is deliberately distracted from the real criminals destroying society. Instead of confronting corruption, state capture, and political failure exposed before the Madlanga Commission, people are encouraged to direct their anger at the easiest and most vulnerable targets, foreign nationals who are themselves trying to survive poverty and economic hardship. That is how populist politics works. It protects the powerful while turning the poor against one another manipulating their ignorance.

Hopewell Chin’ono

28,263 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Binalakshmi Nepram You want to work with the mothers of Manipur who instruct their sons to rape women?? What situation did they exactly bring under control?? All I’ve heard and known about them is nothing but chaos and destruction. Remember your brothers did not shy away from publicly molesting ,groping and parading women naked because of the green light given by these mothers. By supporting these women you are endorsing and justifying the shameful act of the men who disrespect women and yet you call yourself a women activist. You should be ashamed. Also please do not compare your online attacks to that of the ordeals of our two sisters. On the other hand,the Meira Paibis are demanding the media outlets to provide video evidence of the rape if not they will file a lawsuit against them. Such a disgrace and yet BinaNepram wants to work with them. Speaks so much about herself as well. I rest my case here. #ManipurHorror #ManipurCrisis #ManipurIncident #ManipurVideo #ManipurVoilence #ShameOnBinalakhsmi #ShameOnMeiraPaibis #SeparationOnlySolution United Nations United NationsHumanRights 超级Z.Y.N 发明家 V2 European Commission BBC News (UK) UK Parliament Breaking News UK USA TODAY Amnesty International USA Judicial Watch ⚖️ Judicial Office BBC Scotland News BBC Wales News The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints The Church of England India Today NE Joe Biden President Donald J. Trump Pope Leo XIV United Nations_HRC Int'l Criminal Court ICJ Int'l Criminal Court Karim A. A. Khan KC Justice International U.S. Department of Justice - International Hague Justice Portal Karim A. A. Khan KC (In)justice International American Red Cross British Red Cross 🧡

Zoukim

16,464 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Following our previous post about Chris Buckler's BBC interview with Tristan Morrow - who spoke about leaving the Orange Order and identifying as a trans woman - we listened to another segment from the same edition of The Stephen Nolan Show. The discussion was about Féile an Phobail's decision to cancel a Women's Rights Network panel event on women's sex-based rights. Overall, it was a much more balanced discussion. Buckler challenged both guests, questioned claims from both sides and pushed back at various points. But several moments stood out. One was a claim by People Before Profit's Fiona Ferguson that organisations like the Women's Rights Network wanted "people's genitals to be checked before they're allowed to go into toilets." Buckler then asked WRN NI's Nora Calder: "Do you want people's genitals checked before they go to the toilet?" When a guest makes a highly contentious factual claim, shouldn't the first question be whether there's evidence to support it? Otherwise, an unsubstantiated allegation risks becoming the premise of the discussion - rather than something to be tested. Ferguson also invoked contested suicide statistics relating to transgender people, which also went unchallenged. But there are broader editorial questions too. Tristan Morrow - a young man who identifies as a woman - was given 21 minutes of airtime, during which his perspective was explored with relatively little challenge. Where is the equivalent long-form interview with a woman explaining why single-sex spaces matter to her? Or with someone who says they have suffered discrimination because of their lawful gender-critical beliefs? The BBC also chose to publish Morrow's interview separately on BBC Sounds as a standalone programme, giving further prominence to one side's personal testimony. And prior to introducing this segment Buckler reflected on the response to the interview with Tristan Morrow saying he'd received "lovely messages" from listeners. There is, of course, nothing wrong with telling his story. And due impartiality doesn't require every viewpoint to receive equal airtime. But it does require careful editorial judgement about which voices are amplified, how contested claims are handled, and whose experiences audiences are invited to understand. Taken together, this coverage raises legitimate questions about whether that standard was met. 🎧 We've shared a short clip here. You can listen to the full discussion from on The Stephen Nolan Show (22 July). Tristan Morrow's interview is also available separately on BBC Sounds as a standalone programme.

SEEN in Journalism

13,982 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Carol Vorderman, "Trust in politics is lower than ever" "Trust in newspapers.. Even wikipedia won't accept many, including the Daily Mail, as a reliable data source" "Trust in broadcast is in doubt" "And trust in the BBC is declining.. It's fallen 20% in the five years since 2018" "And distrust in the BBS had grown in that time from 11% to 26%" "Is it any wonder that's how so many people feel after so many controversial decisions by BBC management" "The handling of Hugh Edwards.. The ludicrous suspension of Gary Linekar after referencing a tweet by Suella Braverman, are you mad?" "Politics.. Arrogance.. Snobbery.. Leads to disillusionment" "The rich and powerful corrupted politics.. The upper middles taking broadcast for themselves" "The increasingly absurd right wing newspaper headlines being promoted by political programs" "What has this got to do with class? Everything. Literally everything" "After 14 years of austerity and lying by the privileged political class, this country is in an absolute mess" "And the TV industry must accept part of the responsibility for that too.. Including the riots" "We used to be the message makers.. How responsible have we been with those messages.. Not very.. Reckless" "The normalising and platforming of Nigel Farage on I'm a celebrity" *huge clap from the audience* "Oh Nigel is just Nigel.. Nothing to do with me.. What planet is that person on who thinks that?" "The Tufton street mob, opaquely funded right wing lobbying groups.. Appearing as so called independent voices.. So many times on BBC political programs they've probably got their own dressing rooms" "Note, the disgraced BBC Chairman, Richard Sharp had been a director of the right wing policy studies: address, 57 Tufton Street" "You so often give credibility to those who deserve none at all. And when people feel they have no voice, there is a vacuum" "And who floods in to fill the vacuum? The far right" "You cannot be an industry with the power to create the conversation and then claim tat nothing is your responsibility"

Farrukh

301,521 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren