Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Whitney Webb exposes the climate movement's shocking truth. Groups like "Just Stop Oil" are funded by oil dynasties—Rockefeller, Getty. Why? They've shifted the focus from real pollution to CO2, making you the villain, not the corporate or military polluters. The goal? Control. Control energy, and you control a family's...

180,141 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Why is the mainstream climate solution exclusively technological & financial, while the simplest, most proven method—mass reforestation—is dismissed? Whitney Webb dissects the glaring contradiction. She notes that figures like Bill Gates, the largest private US landowner, actively "pooh-pooh" planting trees despite the climate emergency they proclaim. Instead, the mandated path is a dystopian shift to electric vehicles and complex carbon markets—solutions engineered by and for Wall Street. This path necessitates mass mining on an unprecedented scale, Webb argues, unleashing environmental destruction and human rights abuses, including child labor, upon the developing world. This eviscerates the very communities the left claims to protect. Webb posits that the true goal is not salvation, but control. Controlling household energy usage is the ultimate lever to control economic activity, prosperity, and even family size. The narrative of impending cataclysm is a fear-based tool to make the public accept this unprecedented centralization of power. The most alarming part? The architects are not scientists but financiers. Larry Fink (BlackRock), Michael Bloomberg, and Mark Carney are coalescing around initiatives like the GFANZ, which seeks to hand Wall Street direct control of the IMF and World Bank under the guise of climate action. The critical question: How can anyone genuinely concerned with people and the planet sign onto a future where the same forces that caused the crisis are granted total control over the solution?

Camus

158,028 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC) was not created by a group of scientists in the late-1980s with the intention of studying both natural and man-made impacts on the global climate system. That did not happen. Period. Why would the IPCC be needed on the scientific front when there were already government agencies like the BoM, Met Office, NASA, NCAR and NOAA working on this? The IPCC was created by bureaucrats with a vested financial and political interest to use the scientific community to build a case to regulate oil companies and control energy, in hopes they could convince the public that consumption of coal, oil and natural gas were causing harmful anthropogenic climate change. Climate change became the Goldilocks issue to move that agenda along, as it would otherwise have little support. Dr. Judith Curry (Judith Curry) explains this in her interview with John Stossel from October. 🎙️ Here’s a snippet. ✂️ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . The origins go back to the 1980s, and the U.N. environmental program had this big environmental agenda, anti-capitalism. They hated the oil companies and they seized on the climate change issue as one to move their policies along. . . the policy cart was way out in front of the scientific horse from the very beginning. So, the IPCC’s mandate was to look for dangerous human-caused climate change. The IPCC wasn’t supposed to focus on any benefits of warming. They weren’t supposed to focus on natural climate variability. They were just supposed to look for the signal of dangerous human-caused climate change.” 🔗 You can watch the full interview here:

Chris Martz

88,087 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren