Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Who can take it this rough? #squashing #bigbeartop #chaser4chubs #chaser4chubby #chubbybear #chubbychaser #chub4chaser #chubbygay #gaybears #gaychaser #chubbyforchaser #daddybear #chubtop #chub #gaychubchaser #chasers #domchub

ChubTopia's profile picture

ChubTOPia 20K ($6.99 OF and JFF)

20,613 subscribers

67,859 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#squashing#bigbeartop#chaser4chubs#chaser4chubby#chubbybear#chubbychaser#chub4chaser#chubbygay#gaybears#gaychaser#chubbyforchaser#daddybear#chubtop#chub#gaychubchaser#chasers#domchub
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

/ hugs & kisses 😘 / #gaychubby #gaybear #gaychub #chubbygay #gayart #gayman #beargay #gaybeard #chub #gaybears #bear #chubbybear #daddybear #chubby #gaydaddy #gaychaser #gayporn #porn #bearporn #chubbyporn
0:31

Sensitive content

/ hugs & kisses 😘 / #gaychubby #gaybear #gaychub #chubbygay #gayart #gayman #beargay #gaybeard #chub #gaybears #bear #chubbybear #daddybear #chubby #gaydaddy #gaychaser #gayporn #porn #bearporn #chubbyporn

fur.post

12,324 просмотров • 1 год назад

Welcome To My Twitter! 🐻🇺🇸🎉 BPapi. 😉❤️ #Retweet #chaser #chaser4chub #chaser4bear #chubby_chaser #chub #bear #bigbear #hairy #hairygay #chubchaser #chubbychaser #beardedgay #gaybears #gaychaser #GayChub #GayChubChaser #ChubbyGay #BiggerCity
0:24

Sensitive content

Welcome To My Twitter! 🐻🇺🇸🎉 BPapi. 😉❤️ #Retweet #chaser #chaser4chub #chaser4bear #chubby_chaser #chub #bear #bigbear #hairy #hairygay #chubchaser #chubbychaser #beardedgay #gaybears #gaychaser #GayChub #GayChubChaser #ChubbyGay #BiggerCity

BPapi Rob 🐻🇺🇸

38,630 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Qullamaggie on Taking Breaks From Trading, You’re Not Gonna Make It “And I don’t think these people who feel like they need breaks from trading because they had a few bad days — I don’t think they’ll ever make it. No, I really don’t. I think you know, if you need to take a break as soon as things get tough, you’re never gonna make it, because things get rough like all the time. Everything can be perfect and a few days later you know things are super rough. You just need to get your shit together and not act like a drama queen. It happens — get over it. And if it gets you more than one night’s sleep to get over it, you know, I think you’re just gonna have a hard time doing this consistently over the long term. That’s my personal opinion — I have no data on it, just my personal opinion.”
0:58

Qullamaggie on Taking Breaks From Trading, You’re Not Gonna Make It “And I don’t think these people who feel like they need breaks from trading because they had a few bad days — I don’t think they’ll ever make it. No, I really don’t. I think you know, if you need to take a break as soon as things get tough, you’re never gonna make it, because things get rough like all the time. Everything can be perfect and a few days later you know things are super rough. You just need to get your shit together and not act like a drama queen. It happens — get over it. And if it gets you more than one night’s sleep to get over it, you know, I think you’re just gonna have a hard time doing this consistently over the long term. That’s my personal opinion — I have no data on it, just my personal opinion.”

Lone

15,626 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

#TheCloudXLinglingKwong #Linglingkwong‌ #หลิงหลิงคอง‌ : And during the period when you already had work but ppl still didn’t know you yet like you hadn’t blown up yet. How did you spend that period of your life? How did you work? Ling: Tbh, that period of my life was a different kind of happiness. I felt like I had work, acting jobs kept coming in steadily. Maybe it wasn’t flashy - no ads, no events, but it was a peaceful and happy life. I felt like this was already enough, already ok : It was like you’ve come so far now? Ling: Actually, that period wasn’t easy/comfortable either. I mean, when I went to set, I went by myself. Sometimes I’d take a Grab, a taxi, or a motorcycle taxi to work. But I was happy. I felt like it wasn’t that rough at all. I felt like it was fun. And I’m someone who doesn’t need anyone looking after me, I can handle myself, so I wasn’t really afraid. I’m the kind of person who just goes for it once I’ve decided
1:03

#TheCloudXLinglingKwong #Linglingkwong‌ #หลิงหลิงคอง‌ : And during the period when you already had work but ppl still didn’t know you yet like you hadn’t blown up yet. How did you spend that period of your life? How did you work? Ling: Tbh, that period of my life was a different kind of happiness. I felt like I had work, acting jobs kept coming in steadily. Maybe it wasn’t flashy - no ads, no events, but it was a peaceful and happy life. I felt like this was already enough, already ok : It was like you’ve come so far now? Ling: Actually, that period wasn’t easy/comfortable either. I mean, when I went to set, I went by myself. Sometimes I’d take a Grab, a taxi, or a motorcycle taxi to work. But I was happy. I felt like it wasn’t that rough at all. I felt like it was fun. And I’m someone who doesn’t need anyone looking after me, I can handle myself, so I wasn’t really afraid. I’m the kind of person who just goes for it once I’ve decided

lingdenn. — busy

19,901 просмотров • 23 дней назад

🐺: i'm sending encouragement to anyone who's going through a rough patch or feeling lost, these are just periods; when it happens, take a little time to rest and reflect on why you feel this way: "do i need a break, or do i need to switch to something else that i want to do?" we must ask for advice 🐺: actually, it's not like i don't trust my own thoughts or anything like that, but as we keep growing up, we can always listen to other people's thoughts and share ideas with one another. It becomes something for us to reflect on; because at the end of the day, we're the ones who get to choose which path we'll take, what we like, and what we want to do; it's just about seeing new perspectives from others and applying them to our lives // He doesn't know, but i needed these words so much #ZeePruk ♡
0:58

🐺: i'm sending encouragement to anyone who's going through a rough patch or feeling lost, these are just periods; when it happens, take a little time to rest and reflect on why you feel this way: "do i need a break, or do i need to switch to something else that i want to do?" we must ask for advice 🐺: actually, it's not like i don't trust my own thoughts or anything like that, but as we keep growing up, we can always listen to other people's thoughts and share ideas with one another. It becomes something for us to reflect on; because at the end of the day, we're the ones who get to choose which path we'll take, what we like, and what we want to do; it's just about seeing new perspectives from others and applying them to our lives // He doesn't know, but i needed these words so much #ZeePruk ♡

🍁

14,846 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This is one answer. 1/2 REPORTER: Mr. President, Tulsi Gabbard has submitted a criminal referral to the Department of Justice. From your perspective, who should the DOJ target as part of their investigation? What specific figures in the Obama administration? TRUMP: Well, based on what I read, and I read pretty much what you read, it would be President Obama, he started it, and Biden was there with him, and Comey was there, and Clapper the whole whole group was there. Brennan, they were all there, in a room. Right here, this was the room. This is much more beautiful than it was then, but that's okay. I have nice pictures up, they came out of the vaults, they were in there for 100 years, this is much more beautiful. We have the Declaration of Independence now in the room, which wasn't here. I guess people didn't feel too good about putting it here, but I do. But you know what, if you look at those papers, they have a stone cold, and it was President Obama. It wasn't lots of people all over the place, it was them too. But the leader of the gang was President Obama, Barack Hussein Obama, have you heard of him? And except for the fact that he gets shielded by the press for his entire life, that's the one they, look, he's guilty. It's not a question. You know, I like to say, let's give it time. It's there, he's guilty. This was treason. This was every word you can think of. They tried to steal the election. They tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever even imagined, even in other countries. You've seen some pretty rough countries. This man has seen some pretty rough countries, but you've never seen anything like that. And we have all of the documents. And from what Tulsi told me, she's got thousands of additional documents coming. So President Obama, it was his concept, his idea, but he also got it from crooked Hillary Clinton. Crooked is a $3 bill. Hillary Clinton and her group, the Democrats, spent $12 million to Christopher Steele to write up a report that was a total fake report. Took two years to figure that out, but it came out that it was a total fake report. It was made up fiction. And they used that. The one thing they weren't able to do was to, and probably the only thing I respect about the press in years is the press refused to write it before the election. They refused to put it in. The Steele report was a disaster. All lies, all fabrication, all admitted, and admitted fraud. She paid $12 million and the Democrats for that report to a wise guy named Christopher Steele. He wrote a phony report, and they wanted to get that report in before the election. And I'll tell you what, I talk about all the time the fake news, how bad it is. But in this case, they wouldn't do it. They saw it. They read it. And they said, "We don't believe it." And it was only after, substantially, like a month and a half after the election that it got printed, and it was a big wisp, it was just like a bang, nothing, because the election had ended. If that report had gotten published by the New York Times or somebody, and I respect the Times for maybe only this, because they're crooked as you can be. They're a terrible paper, a crooked, corrupt paper. But for this one moment, they said, "This is bullshit. We can't put this in." And neither could any other paper. Wall Street Journal's a lousy paper, very, very dishonest paper. As you see, I'm suing them for a lot of money, because they do things very badly. It's a really, it's got a nice name, but it's really, in my opinion, it's a terrible paper, and it can be corrupt. But just so you know, they didn't take the steel report. It was the dossier. Remember the famous dossier? I called it the fake news dossier. The news wouldn't publish it. And I'm amazed.
6:18

This is one answer. 1/2 REPORTER: Mr. President, Tulsi Gabbard has submitted a criminal referral to the Department of Justice. From your perspective, who should the DOJ target as part of their investigation? What specific figures in the Obama administration? TRUMP: Well, based on what I read, and I read pretty much what you read, it would be President Obama, he started it, and Biden was there with him, and Comey was there, and Clapper the whole whole group was there. Brennan, they were all there, in a room. Right here, this was the room. This is much more beautiful than it was then, but that's okay. I have nice pictures up, they came out of the vaults, they were in there for 100 years, this is much more beautiful. We have the Declaration of Independence now in the room, which wasn't here. I guess people didn't feel too good about putting it here, but I do. But you know what, if you look at those papers, they have a stone cold, and it was President Obama. It wasn't lots of people all over the place, it was them too. But the leader of the gang was President Obama, Barack Hussein Obama, have you heard of him? And except for the fact that he gets shielded by the press for his entire life, that's the one they, look, he's guilty. It's not a question. You know, I like to say, let's give it time. It's there, he's guilty. This was treason. This was every word you can think of. They tried to steal the election. They tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever even imagined, even in other countries. You've seen some pretty rough countries. This man has seen some pretty rough countries, but you've never seen anything like that. And we have all of the documents. And from what Tulsi told me, she's got thousands of additional documents coming. So President Obama, it was his concept, his idea, but he also got it from crooked Hillary Clinton. Crooked is a $3 bill. Hillary Clinton and her group, the Democrats, spent $12 million to Christopher Steele to write up a report that was a total fake report. Took two years to figure that out, but it came out that it was a total fake report. It was made up fiction. And they used that. The one thing they weren't able to do was to, and probably the only thing I respect about the press in years is the press refused to write it before the election. They refused to put it in. The Steele report was a disaster. All lies, all fabrication, all admitted, and admitted fraud. She paid $12 million and the Democrats for that report to a wise guy named Christopher Steele. He wrote a phony report, and they wanted to get that report in before the election. And I'll tell you what, I talk about all the time the fake news, how bad it is. But in this case, they wouldn't do it. They saw it. They read it. And they said, "We don't believe it." And it was only after, substantially, like a month and a half after the election that it got printed, and it was a big wisp, it was just like a bang, nothing, because the election had ended. If that report had gotten published by the New York Times or somebody, and I respect the Times for maybe only this, because they're crooked as you can be. They're a terrible paper, a crooked, corrupt paper. But for this one moment, they said, "This is bullshit. We can't put this in." And neither could any other paper. Wall Street Journal's a lousy paper, very, very dishonest paper. As you see, I'm suing them for a lot of money, because they do things very badly. It's a really, it's got a nice name, but it's really, in my opinion, it's a terrible paper, and it can be corrupt. But just so you know, they didn't take the steel report. It was the dossier. Remember the famous dossier? I called it the fake news dossier. The news wouldn't publish it. And I'm amazed.

Jim Stewartson, Antifascist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🏴‍☠️🇺🇸

36,593 просмотров • 1 год назад

Jeff Bezos on why stress is almost always a sign that you're avoiding action: When times are rough, Bezos doesn't talk about willpower or pushing through. He reframes where stress actually comes from. "I find if I'm stressed about something, it's usually because I'm not doing anything about it," he says. For Bezos, stress is information. He treats it as a physical signal worth paying attention to: "If I'm stressed about something, I'm trying to figure out why am I stressed? I'm listening to my body as a signal that something is awry." And the relief comes from simply starting to move on it: "The stress goes away the second I take the first step of identifying the source of the stress. Why am I stressed about this? What's going on?" The next step is to stop carrying it alone. Bezos talks to someone, and more specifically, he looks for allies: "If you can find friends who are interested in similar things or want to help you solve a problem, problem solving is inspiring for me all by itself." This is where the shift happens. Once Jeff Bezos has people around him, the same situation that once felt heavy becomes something he enjoys: "There's nothing more fun than getting in a room with a group of inventors and saying, 'Look, here's the problem. Let's invent a solution to it.' And as soon as you start doing that, I find that it turns from something that might create stress into something that creates fun."
1:20

Jeff Bezos on why stress is almost always a sign that you're avoiding action: When times are rough, Bezos doesn't talk about willpower or pushing through. He reframes where stress actually comes from. "I find if I'm stressed about something, it's usually because I'm not doing anything about it," he says. For Bezos, stress is information. He treats it as a physical signal worth paying attention to: "If I'm stressed about something, I'm trying to figure out why am I stressed? I'm listening to my body as a signal that something is awry." And the relief comes from simply starting to move on it: "The stress goes away the second I take the first step of identifying the source of the stress. Why am I stressed about this? What's going on?" The next step is to stop carrying it alone. Bezos talks to someone, and more specifically, he looks for allies: "If you can find friends who are interested in similar things or want to help you solve a problem, problem solving is inspiring for me all by itself." This is where the shift happens. Once Jeff Bezos has people around him, the same situation that once felt heavy becomes something he enjoys: "There's nothing more fun than getting in a room with a group of inventors and saying, 'Look, here's the problem. Let's invent a solution to it.' And as soon as you start doing that, I find that it turns from something that might create stress into something that creates fun."

Big Brain Business

43,146 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

250715 #ATEEZ #Mingi TOKTOQ pop live (rough translation): 🐥 I’ve never injured my toenail… It was my toe that got hurt. 💬 How’s your toe? 🐥Well, it probably healed on its own. I’ve been treating it while taking care of it. But it seems like it’s getting better. 💬 How do you run like that? (at the concerts) 🐥 Well, you just get through it. There’s something like that, you know. The ticket prices are expensive. The ticket prices are obviously expensive, and my body, just like everyone else’s, is the most important thing, and my body is the most important to me too. But, anyway, even though my toe hurts a bit or something else hurts, I can’t rest. So, I just have to do my best within what I can do. But if I think like, ‘Oh, my toe hurts, so I’ll skip this show, or skip this city,’ it’s not like I’ve never thought like that. But when you’re too realistic, you only focus on the things you want to do, and instead of putting your best into every moment, you think more about having fun and enjoying it. So, for every performance, no matter what, I have to perform with the same energy, with the same intensity, even if it’s not about working hard or doing my best. When I look at the fans, I don’t want to feel embarrassed. That’s what’s important, I think. Yeah, I have to take good care of myself because I can’t afford to get hurt. But this isn’t like using a phone. It’s not like paying 1,000 won or 500 won. That’s still expensive, but it’s not like that. It’s 100,000, 200,000, 300,000, 400,000, 1,000,000 won - big amounts of money. It’s not something I can just do. Of course, there are people who come with a lot of difficulty. Why are you suddenly talking about insurance? (in the comments). Of course, I have health insurance.
2:59

250715 #ATEEZ #Mingi TOKTOQ pop live (rough translation): 🐥 I’ve never injured my toenail… It was my toe that got hurt. 💬 How’s your toe? 🐥Well, it probably healed on its own. I’ve been treating it while taking care of it. But it seems like it’s getting better. 💬 How do you run like that? (at the concerts) 🐥 Well, you just get through it. There’s something like that, you know. The ticket prices are expensive. The ticket prices are obviously expensive, and my body, just like everyone else’s, is the most important thing, and my body is the most important to me too. But, anyway, even though my toe hurts a bit or something else hurts, I can’t rest. So, I just have to do my best within what I can do. But if I think like, ‘Oh, my toe hurts, so I’ll skip this show, or skip this city,’ it’s not like I’ve never thought like that. But when you’re too realistic, you only focus on the things you want to do, and instead of putting your best into every moment, you think more about having fun and enjoying it. So, for every performance, no matter what, I have to perform with the same energy, with the same intensity, even if it’s not about working hard or doing my best. When I look at the fans, I don’t want to feel embarrassed. That’s what’s important, I think. Yeah, I have to take good care of myself because I can’t afford to get hurt. But this isn’t like using a phone. It’s not like paying 1,000 won or 500 won. That’s still expensive, but it’s not like that. It’s 100,000, 200,000, 300,000, 400,000, 1,000,000 won - big amounts of money. It’s not something I can just do. Of course, there are people who come with a lot of difficulty. Why are you suddenly talking about insurance? (in the comments). Of course, I have health insurance.

Irene | AhgaTiny

18,605 просмотров • 1 год назад

Today, we’re announcing Kosmos, our newest AI Scientist, available to use now. Users estimate Kosmos does 6 months of work in a single day. One run can read 1,500 papers and write 42,000 lines of code. At least 79% of its findings are reproducible. Kosmos has made 7 discoveries so far, which we are releasing today, in areas ranging from neuroscience to material science and clinical genetics, in collaboration with our academic beta testers. Three of these discoveries reproduced unpublished findings; four are net new, validated contributions to the scientific literature. AI-accelerated science is here. Our core innovation in Kosmos is the use of a structured, continuously-updated world model. As described in our technical report, Kosmos’ world model allows it to process orders of magnitude more information than could fit into the context of even the longest-context language models, allowing it to synthesize more information and pursue coherent goals over longer time horizons than Robin or any of our other prior agents. In this respect, we believe Kosmos is the most compute-intensive language agent released so far in any field, and by far the most capable AI Scientist available today. The use of a persistent world model also enables single Kosmos trajectories to produce highly complex outputs that require multiple significant logical leaps. As with all of our systems, Kosmos is designed with transparency and verifiability in mind: every conclusion in a Kosmos report can be traced through our platform to the specific lines of code or the specific passages in the scientific literature that inspired it, ensuring that Kosmos’ findings are fully auditable at all times. We are also using this opportunity to announce the launch of Edison Scientific, a new commercial spinout of FutureHouse, which will be focused on commercializing our agents and applying them to automate scientific research in drug discovery and beyond. Edison will be taking over management of the FutureHouse platform, where you can access Kosmos alongside our Literature, Molecules, and Precedent agents (previously Crow, Phoenix, and Owl). Edison will continue to offer free tier usage for casual users and academics, while also offering higher rate limits and additional features for users who need them. You can read more about this spinout on our blog, below. A few important notes if you’re going to try Kosmos. Firstly, Kosmos is different from many other AI tools you might have played with, including our other agents. It is more similar to a Deep Research tool than it is to a chatbot: it takes some time to figure out how to prompt it effectively, and we have tried to include guidelines on this to help (see below). It costs $200/run right now (200 credits per run, and $1/credit), with some free tier usage for academics. This is heavily discounted; people who sign up for Founding Subscriptions now can lock in the $1/credit price indefinitely, but the price ultimately will probably be higher. Again, this is less chatbot and more research tool, something you run on high-value targets as needed. Some caveats are also warranted. Firstly, we find that 80% of Kosmos findings are reproducible, which also means 20% are not -- some things it says will be wrong. Also, Kosmos certainly does produce outputs that are the equivalent to several months of human labor, but it also often goes down rabbit holes or chases statistically significant yet scientifically irrelevant findings. We often run Kosmos multiple times on the same objective in order to sample the various research avenues it can take. There are still a bunch of rough edges on the UI and such, which we are working on. Finally, we are aware that the 6 month figure is much greater than estimates by other AI labs, like METR, about the length of tasks that AI Agents can currently perform. You can read discussion about this in our blog post. Huge congratulations to our team that put this together, led by Ludovico Mitchener and Michaela Hinks: Angela Yiu, Benjamin Chang, Sid Narayanan, Edwin Melville-Green, Albert Bou, Arvis Sulovari, Oz Wassie, Jon Laurent. A particular shout out to Michael Skarlinski and his team that rebuilt the platform for this launch, especially Andy Cai Andy Cai, Richard Magness, Remo Storni, Tyler Nadolski Tyler Nadolski, Mayk Caldas Mayk Caldas, Sam Cox Sam Cox and more. This work would not have been possible without significant contributions from academic collaborators Mathieu Bourdenx, Eric Landsness, Dániel Barabási, Nicky Evans, Tonio Buonassisi, Bruna Gomes, Shriya Reddy, Martha Foiani, and Randall Bateman. We also want to thank our numerous supporters, especially Eric Schmidt, who has been a tremendous ally. We will have more to say about our supporters soon!
0:44

Today, we’re announcing Kosmos, our newest AI Scientist, available to use now. Users estimate Kosmos does 6 months of work in a single day. One run can read 1,500 papers and write 42,000 lines of code. At least 79% of its findings are reproducible. Kosmos has made 7 discoveries so far, which we are releasing today, in areas ranging from neuroscience to material science and clinical genetics, in collaboration with our academic beta testers. Three of these discoveries reproduced unpublished findings; four are net new, validated contributions to the scientific literature. AI-accelerated science is here. Our core innovation in Kosmos is the use of a structured, continuously-updated world model. As described in our technical report, Kosmos’ world model allows it to process orders of magnitude more information than could fit into the context of even the longest-context language models, allowing it to synthesize more information and pursue coherent goals over longer time horizons than Robin or any of our other prior agents. In this respect, we believe Kosmos is the most compute-intensive language agent released so far in any field, and by far the most capable AI Scientist available today. The use of a persistent world model also enables single Kosmos trajectories to produce highly complex outputs that require multiple significant logical leaps. As with all of our systems, Kosmos is designed with transparency and verifiability in mind: every conclusion in a Kosmos report can be traced through our platform to the specific lines of code or the specific passages in the scientific literature that inspired it, ensuring that Kosmos’ findings are fully auditable at all times. We are also using this opportunity to announce the launch of Edison Scientific, a new commercial spinout of FutureHouse, which will be focused on commercializing our agents and applying them to automate scientific research in drug discovery and beyond. Edison will be taking over management of the FutureHouse platform, where you can access Kosmos alongside our Literature, Molecules, and Precedent agents (previously Crow, Phoenix, and Owl). Edison will continue to offer free tier usage for casual users and academics, while also offering higher rate limits and additional features for users who need them. You can read more about this spinout on our blog, below. A few important notes if you’re going to try Kosmos. Firstly, Kosmos is different from many other AI tools you might have played with, including our other agents. It is more similar to a Deep Research tool than it is to a chatbot: it takes some time to figure out how to prompt it effectively, and we have tried to include guidelines on this to help (see below). It costs $200/run right now (200 credits per run, and $1/credit), with some free tier usage for academics. This is heavily discounted; people who sign up for Founding Subscriptions now can lock in the $1/credit price indefinitely, but the price ultimately will probably be higher. Again, this is less chatbot and more research tool, something you run on high-value targets as needed. Some caveats are also warranted. Firstly, we find that 80% of Kosmos findings are reproducible, which also means 20% are not -- some things it says will be wrong. Also, Kosmos certainly does produce outputs that are the equivalent to several months of human labor, but it also often goes down rabbit holes or chases statistically significant yet scientifically irrelevant findings. We often run Kosmos multiple times on the same objective in order to sample the various research avenues it can take. There are still a bunch of rough edges on the UI and such, which we are working on. Finally, we are aware that the 6 month figure is much greater than estimates by other AI labs, like METR, about the length of tasks that AI Agents can currently perform. You can read discussion about this in our blog post. Huge congratulations to our team that put this together, led by Ludovico Mitchener and Michaela Hinks: Angela Yiu, Benjamin Chang, Sid Narayanan, Edwin Melville-Green, Albert Bou, Arvis Sulovari, Oz Wassie, Jon Laurent. A particular shout out to Michael Skarlinski and his team that rebuilt the platform for this launch, especially Andy Cai Andy Cai, Richard Magness, Remo Storni, Tyler Nadolski Tyler Nadolski, Mayk Caldas Mayk Caldas, Sam Cox Sam Cox and more. This work would not have been possible without significant contributions from academic collaborators Mathieu Bourdenx, Eric Landsness, Dániel Barabási, Nicky Evans, Tonio Buonassisi, Bruna Gomes, Shriya Reddy, Martha Foiani, and Randall Bateman. We also want to thank our numerous supporters, especially Eric Schmidt, who has been a tremendous ally. We will have more to say about our supporters soon!

Sam Rodriques

732,394 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

We’re not all Americans! When a group of supposed “Americans” marches through the streets of New York and chants “we support Hezbollah here” and “we support Hamas here,” not to mention their overt, clear, and unequivocal support of the fascistic Islamic Republic of Iran’s regime, we’ve reached a point where it is critical, however uncomfortable and controversial, to make explicit declarations and take clear stances. Clueless Americans, including “paper Americans” who are Americans in name only and are mere extensions of their backwards and violent native homelands, insist that celebrating terrorists and Jihadis, are not actually American. Being an American entails much more than merely being a U.S. citizen; Americanism is a spirit, a way of life, an ethos, a willingness to reject what is harmful, unjust, regressive, backward, and despicable. You can disagree with U.S. and Israeli actions all you want, and I certainly do in numerous instances. However, such disagreements should never translate to overt support for terrorists like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Ayatollah’s regime. Such disagreements should never justify ceaseless attacks on Jews, synagogues, and Israeli-Americans, while hiding behind the fake guise of “Islamophobia.” It is time that Americans begin the messy journey of cleaning house, recognizing the failure of endless immigration, boundaryless multiculturalism, and suicidal tolerance of the inherently intolerable. It is time to make access to freedom and Western privilege available to individuals who will actually enhance and bolster our societies, not to those who seek to destroy them from within. It’s time to reject Islamism, political correctness, fascism, and “Third-Worldism”, which is a disease that seeks to import the ills and disasters of developing nations, not their strengths and unique characteristics. This does not at all mean endorsement of hate, violence, bigotry, racism, xenophobia, or anti-immigrant sentiments, for multiple things can be true at once. Immigrants are and have been the backbone of American ingenuity, especially those coming from rough backgrounds and struggling nations. Plus, many of the most toxic, horrendous ideas are promoted by natives, often white, far leftists, who have no real appreciation for their privilege, and endorse the most destructive ideas and proclamations using academia, journalism, or “social justice” activism.
4:17

We’re not all Americans! When a group of supposed “Americans” marches through the streets of New York and chants “we support Hezbollah here” and “we support Hamas here,” not to mention their overt, clear, and unequivocal support of the fascistic Islamic Republic of Iran’s regime, we’ve reached a point where it is critical, however uncomfortable and controversial, to make explicit declarations and take clear stances. Clueless Americans, including “paper Americans” who are Americans in name only and are mere extensions of their backwards and violent native homelands, insist that celebrating terrorists and Jihadis, are not actually American. Being an American entails much more than merely being a U.S. citizen; Americanism is a spirit, a way of life, an ethos, a willingness to reject what is harmful, unjust, regressive, backward, and despicable. You can disagree with U.S. and Israeli actions all you want, and I certainly do in numerous instances. However, such disagreements should never translate to overt support for terrorists like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Ayatollah’s regime. Such disagreements should never justify ceaseless attacks on Jews, synagogues, and Israeli-Americans, while hiding behind the fake guise of “Islamophobia.” It is time that Americans begin the messy journey of cleaning house, recognizing the failure of endless immigration, boundaryless multiculturalism, and suicidal tolerance of the inherently intolerable. It is time to make access to freedom and Western privilege available to individuals who will actually enhance and bolster our societies, not to those who seek to destroy them from within. It’s time to reject Islamism, political correctness, fascism, and “Third-Worldism”, which is a disease that seeks to import the ills and disasters of developing nations, not their strengths and unique characteristics. This does not at all mean endorsement of hate, violence, bigotry, racism, xenophobia, or anti-immigrant sentiments, for multiple things can be true at once. Immigrants are and have been the backbone of American ingenuity, especially those coming from rough backgrounds and struggling nations. Plus, many of the most toxic, horrendous ideas are promoted by natives, often white, far leftists, who have no real appreciation for their privilege, and endorse the most destructive ideas and proclamations using academia, journalism, or “social justice” activism.

Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib

33,838 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

It’s been great out here. One of the best things I could have done is come out here. Take my lumps by facing older pitching from elite Juco players to awesome D1 players. First week and a half to two weeks were rough. Almost felt lost. Seeing pitching that has very good movement and run, high velo or guys who just have a really good mix of pitches. Make some adjustments, gain some confidence and get after it. Sometimes they get you- sometimes I get them. That’s the beauty of baseball Shout out to Old Hickory for the amazing wood this summer the TC42 bat that I swing will be available in the next few days go check it out!! You know I’ve been using Bruce Bolt batting gloves since the company literally started. Be looking for a complete refresh on the TC42 batting glove. Time to change things up from the black and red and get some serious pop going. You can see the leg guard, elbow guard, sliding mitt and batting gloves are all Bruce Bolt. Awesome protection, style and function. Grateful to the Marshal Gates Foundation that every year brings some of the best players from around the nation to Utah to train and intersquad all summer long. Can’t say enough great things about this foundation and the amazing things they do. And how can you not just love the play by play announcer Michael Goodkind. He crushes every one of the events he covers. What a summer!! ⚾️😎⚾️ #baseball #homerun Old Hickory Bat Company BRUCE BOLT Texas State Baseball Steven Trout
0:44

It’s been great out here. One of the best things I could have done is come out here. Take my lumps by facing older pitching from elite Juco players to awesome D1 players. First week and a half to two weeks were rough. Almost felt lost. Seeing pitching that has very good movement and run, high velo or guys who just have a really good mix of pitches. Make some adjustments, gain some confidence and get after it. Sometimes they get you- sometimes I get them. That’s the beauty of baseball Shout out to Old Hickory for the amazing wood this summer the TC42 bat that I swing will be available in the next few days go check it out!! You know I’ve been using Bruce Bolt batting gloves since the company literally started. Be looking for a complete refresh on the TC42 batting glove. Time to change things up from the black and red and get some serious pop going. You can see the leg guard, elbow guard, sliding mitt and batting gloves are all Bruce Bolt. Awesome protection, style and function. Grateful to the Marshal Gates Foundation that every year brings some of the best players from around the nation to Utah to train and intersquad all summer long. Can’t say enough great things about this foundation and the amazing things they do. And how can you not just love the play by play announcer Michael Goodkind. He crushes every one of the events he covers. What a summer!! ⚾️😎⚾️ #baseball #homerun Old Hickory Bat Company BRUCE BOLT Texas State Baseball Steven Trout

Tanner Carson

34,187 просмотров • 1 год назад

During the Oxford-style debate at the "Interpreting Europe Conference 2025," I persuaded many professional interpreters to reject the motion: "AI-powered interpretation will never replace human interpretation." Before the debate, the audience was 60-40 in favor of the motion; after, it was about 50-50. The full video is on Youtube. Here is a rough transcript of my speech: Thanks to Gry Gry Hasselbalch for her thoughtful presentation. She argued that AI-supported interpretation will never replace human interpretation. I can't believe that. Today's automatic translators are based on algorithmic methods that my team published at TUM in 1990-1991. Back then, compute was about 10 million times more expensive than it is today, and there wasn't much you could do with our methods - automatic translators at the time could do almost nothing. But since 1941, when the first general-purpose computer was completed, compute has become 10 times cheaper every 5 years. In 2011, compute was already 10,000 times cheaper than in 1991, but the automatic translators still sucked. The Chinese laughed at the automatic translations from Google and other providers. But just five years later, in November 2016, they were no longer laughing, because compute was now 100,000 times cheaper than in 1991, and that was enough: Google suddenly achieved a huge improvement in translation quality through our neural network called LSTM. A year later, everyone was doing it: in 2017, Facebook was using our LSTM to translate 4 billion messages every day. The translations were still not perfect, but now they were getting significantly better every year. Today, a decade after the breakthrough, we have gained another factor of 100, and the translations are already much better than those of 2016. They are certainly better than my own. That's why I also used an AI to translate this text :-) Of course, AI interpreters are already superhuman in some respects, as they can translate for thousands of people simultaneously in dozens of different languages. No human can do that. But when it comes to translation quality, the best human interpreters are still better than the best AIs. But for how much longer? The aforementioned trend will not stop in the coming decades, because the known physical limits of computing are still a long way off. In the next 30 years, compute will again become a million of times cheaper. Everything that seems impressive to us today will seem trivial in retrospect. For this reason alone, no one can seriously believe that AI-supported interpretation will _never_ replace human interpretation. What about the most outstanding of all translations? My favorite example is “The Catcher in the Rye” by Nobel Prize winner J.D. Salinger. Who translated it congenially into German? It was another winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature, Heinrich Böll. One might now hope that such congenial translations are only possible for true people who really know through personal experience what it means to walk barefoot through a field and have all the profoundly human experiences that befall the protagonist of the story. But even in this area, human dominance is not assured. I suspect that the best machine translators will be those who have not only read all the world's literature, who are not just encoders and decoders of sentences, but also have experience in controlling complex humanoid agents that not only have cameras and microphones, but also millions upon millions of touch and pain sensors, and can act in the real world and in principle experience much of what humans experience, interacting with real humans, and learning to better predict their behaviors. These do not yet exist today, but at least simple variants of them have been around for a long time and the prototypes are getting better and better: artificial agents whose main purpose in life is to learn from experience, avoid pain and maximize reward, just like humans. When such agents combine their experience in the real world with the art of expressing themselves like a typical Nobel Prize winner in literature, which can already be acquired today through diligent reading, it seems absurd to assume that AI-supported high quality interpretation will never replace human interpretation. “Never” is such a bold, presumptuous word! Just a few decades ago, many believed that AI would never pass the Turing test, never play chess superhumanly well, never solve difficult math problems formulated in natural language, and so on. All this proved to be a misconception. Consider again that AI gets a million times better per euro every 30 years. It seems inevitable: soon, interpreting AIs will eclipse almost all human interpreters in every important way. Thank you. Final remark: "Unfortunately, Juergen didn't have time to participate in this debate, so he sent me, his avatar." The debate led the charming moderator Andrea Grosso to accept the possibility that AIs will eclipse human interpreters. However, he pointed out that this will take a very long time. My avatar said: "I agree that it will take a long time. This could take months, if not years.”
7:48

During the Oxford-style debate at the "Interpreting Europe Conference 2025," I persuaded many professional interpreters to reject the motion: "AI-powered interpretation will never replace human interpretation." Before the debate, the audience was 60-40 in favor of the motion; after, it was about 50-50. The full video is on Youtube. Here is a rough transcript of my speech: Thanks to Gry Gry Hasselbalch for her thoughtful presentation. She argued that AI-supported interpretation will never replace human interpretation. I can't believe that. Today's automatic translators are based on algorithmic methods that my team published at TUM in 1990-1991. Back then, compute was about 10 million times more expensive than it is today, and there wasn't much you could do with our methods - automatic translators at the time could do almost nothing. But since 1941, when the first general-purpose computer was completed, compute has become 10 times cheaper every 5 years. In 2011, compute was already 10,000 times cheaper than in 1991, but the automatic translators still sucked. The Chinese laughed at the automatic translations from Google and other providers. But just five years later, in November 2016, they were no longer laughing, because compute was now 100,000 times cheaper than in 1991, and that was enough: Google suddenly achieved a huge improvement in translation quality through our neural network called LSTM. A year later, everyone was doing it: in 2017, Facebook was using our LSTM to translate 4 billion messages every day. The translations were still not perfect, but now they were getting significantly better every year. Today, a decade after the breakthrough, we have gained another factor of 100, and the translations are already much better than those of 2016. They are certainly better than my own. That's why I also used an AI to translate this text :-) Of course, AI interpreters are already superhuman in some respects, as they can translate for thousands of people simultaneously in dozens of different languages. No human can do that. But when it comes to translation quality, the best human interpreters are still better than the best AIs. But for how much longer? The aforementioned trend will not stop in the coming decades, because the known physical limits of computing are still a long way off. In the next 30 years, compute will again become a million of times cheaper. Everything that seems impressive to us today will seem trivial in retrospect. For this reason alone, no one can seriously believe that AI-supported interpretation will _never_ replace human interpretation. What about the most outstanding of all translations? My favorite example is “The Catcher in the Rye” by Nobel Prize winner J.D. Salinger. Who translated it congenially into German? It was another winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature, Heinrich Böll. One might now hope that such congenial translations are only possible for true people who really know through personal experience what it means to walk barefoot through a field and have all the profoundly human experiences that befall the protagonist of the story. But even in this area, human dominance is not assured. I suspect that the best machine translators will be those who have not only read all the world's literature, who are not just encoders and decoders of sentences, but also have experience in controlling complex humanoid agents that not only have cameras and microphones, but also millions upon millions of touch and pain sensors, and can act in the real world and in principle experience much of what humans experience, interacting with real humans, and learning to better predict their behaviors. These do not yet exist today, but at least simple variants of them have been around for a long time and the prototypes are getting better and better: artificial agents whose main purpose in life is to learn from experience, avoid pain and maximize reward, just like humans. When such agents combine their experience in the real world with the art of expressing themselves like a typical Nobel Prize winner in literature, which can already be acquired today through diligent reading, it seems absurd to assume that AI-supported high quality interpretation will never replace human interpretation. “Never” is such a bold, presumptuous word! Just a few decades ago, many believed that AI would never pass the Turing test, never play chess superhumanly well, never solve difficult math problems formulated in natural language, and so on. All this proved to be a misconception. Consider again that AI gets a million times better per euro every 30 years. It seems inevitable: soon, interpreting AIs will eclipse almost all human interpreters in every important way. Thank you. Final remark: "Unfortunately, Juergen didn't have time to participate in this debate, so he sent me, his avatar." The debate led the charming moderator Andrea Grosso to accept the possibility that AIs will eclipse human interpreters. However, he pointed out that this will take a very long time. My avatar said: "I agree that it will take a long time. This could take months, if not years.”

Jürgen Schmidhuber

36,279 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sorry to talk more about this, but I felt it was important to discuss. Also, I am sorry I also sound so garbage, the flu is hitting hard. Scripted Captions: Hey. I need to talk about what happened yesterday, and honestly what’s been happening for a bit now, because it’s not only inaccurate… it’s starting to affect my ability to create. Also, I caught the flu, so if I sound rough, that’s why. Bare with me. And yes, this is scripted, because my brain is running on fumes and I want to say this clearly. First, thank you, seriously. To everyone who reached out, commented, sent dms, and just… reminded me I’m not crazy for feeling stressed, thank you. I’ve been trying to keep it together behind the scenes, and your kindness genuinely helped. Here’s what’s going on, as plainly as I can put it, my newer posts on Twitter are being reported for sexual content. My profile pictures on IRIAM are being reported and my IRIAM account has been getting reported. And the reason people keep circling is basically, my vtuber model has boobs and cleavage, and there’s a wardrobe detail on the model that is showing underwear lines. I want to be really, really clear here, I am a seiso creator. I don’t post explicit content. I don’t make sexual content. My streams and posts are not sexual. And yes, I understand that IRIAM’s current review guidelines can flag things like visible underwear details and certain levels of chest exposure, and that profile icons get reviewed even more conservatively. My honest take is I don’t personally agree with how strict that is, especially when the model I’m using is one IRIAM provided me through their system, but I’m not here to wage war with platform rules. I’m here to create so I’m adapting. I’m changing how I crop images. I’m changing what I use for icons. And I’m already working on my 2.0 so it’s clearly safe under the current standards, even if that means my 2.0 ends up less showy than I originally wanted. That part is frustrating. But I’m doing it anyway. What this feels like on the back end is targeted harassment. It’s exhausting, it’s time consuming, and it creates this constant anxiety of “is my account going to get hit again today?” “Am I going to get suspended?” Etc. And on top of that, there’s been misinformation being spread about me as a creator, and that part has honestly been the most draining. I’m not going to name names. I’m not here to start a dogpile. That’s not who I am, and it’s not what I want my community to do. But I am going to say this, using report tools as a weapon to punish someone you don’t like is not “protecting the platform.” It’s bullying. So here’s my boundary and my ask, if you don’t like my design, my vibe, my content, that’s okay. You can mute, block, scroll, disengage. No hard feelings. But please stop trying to take away someone’s platform because you personally don’t approve of their body type or character design. If you genuinely believe something violates guidelines, report it once and let moderation do their job. Don’t turn it into a campaign. That’s not accountability. That’s not “keeping things safe.” That’s just trying to control other creators. I’m going to be honest: this has made me pull back. I had plans to connect people, collaborate more openly, and build more bridges, I’ve even paused any work I had planned to do for the Unofficial IRIAM zine… and I’ve been more cautious lately because I’ve needed to protect my mental health. So if I seem a bit more skittish to work openly with creators going forward, this is the reason why. I still want all of us to succeed. I still want creators to support creators. But I can’t keep putting myself in situations where I’m constantly being targeted. Right now, I’m handling things through the proper channels and documenting everything on my end. I’m going to keep creating, I’m going to keep being me, and I’m not going to let bad-faith reporting rewrite who I am as a creator. To everyone who’s been supportive, I appreciate you more than I can say. And I want to say this clearly one more time; you can disagree with a creator’s design and still behave like an adult. Bodies aren’t automatically sexual. And using reports as a weapon helps nobody, it just makes people afraid to exist. Please be kind to each other. Please don’t use TOS or report tools as a battering ram. It doesn’t make the community safer, it just makes people afraid to create. I’m going to rest, drink something hot, and try to kick this flu. Thank you for hearing me out. I love you guys. See you soon. And as always, Be Kind. p.s. Shoutout to my protect goat. Thank you for always having my back girly.
5:05

Sorry to talk more about this, but I felt it was important to discuss. Also, I am sorry I also sound so garbage, the flu is hitting hard. Scripted Captions: Hey. I need to talk about what happened yesterday, and honestly what’s been happening for a bit now, because it’s not only inaccurate… it’s starting to affect my ability to create. Also, I caught the flu, so if I sound rough, that’s why. Bare with me. And yes, this is scripted, because my brain is running on fumes and I want to say this clearly. First, thank you, seriously. To everyone who reached out, commented, sent dms, and just… reminded me I’m not crazy for feeling stressed, thank you. I’ve been trying to keep it together behind the scenes, and your kindness genuinely helped. Here’s what’s going on, as plainly as I can put it, my newer posts on Twitter are being reported for sexual content. My profile pictures on IRIAM are being reported and my IRIAM account has been getting reported. And the reason people keep circling is basically, my vtuber model has boobs and cleavage, and there’s a wardrobe detail on the model that is showing underwear lines. I want to be really, really clear here, I am a seiso creator. I don’t post explicit content. I don’t make sexual content. My streams and posts are not sexual. And yes, I understand that IRIAM’s current review guidelines can flag things like visible underwear details and certain levels of chest exposure, and that profile icons get reviewed even more conservatively. My honest take is I don’t personally agree with how strict that is, especially when the model I’m using is one IRIAM provided me through their system, but I’m not here to wage war with platform rules. I’m here to create so I’m adapting. I’m changing how I crop images. I’m changing what I use for icons. And I’m already working on my 2.0 so it’s clearly safe under the current standards, even if that means my 2.0 ends up less showy than I originally wanted. That part is frustrating. But I’m doing it anyway. What this feels like on the back end is targeted harassment. It’s exhausting, it’s time consuming, and it creates this constant anxiety of “is my account going to get hit again today?” “Am I going to get suspended?” Etc. And on top of that, there’s been misinformation being spread about me as a creator, and that part has honestly been the most draining. I’m not going to name names. I’m not here to start a dogpile. That’s not who I am, and it’s not what I want my community to do. But I am going to say this, using report tools as a weapon to punish someone you don’t like is not “protecting the platform.” It’s bullying. So here’s my boundary and my ask, if you don’t like my design, my vibe, my content, that’s okay. You can mute, block, scroll, disengage. No hard feelings. But please stop trying to take away someone’s platform because you personally don’t approve of their body type or character design. If you genuinely believe something violates guidelines, report it once and let moderation do their job. Don’t turn it into a campaign. That’s not accountability. That’s not “keeping things safe.” That’s just trying to control other creators. I’m going to be honest: this has made me pull back. I had plans to connect people, collaborate more openly, and build more bridges, I’ve even paused any work I had planned to do for the Unofficial IRIAM zine… and I’ve been more cautious lately because I’ve needed to protect my mental health. So if I seem a bit more skittish to work openly with creators going forward, this is the reason why. I still want all of us to succeed. I still want creators to support creators. But I can’t keep putting myself in situations where I’m constantly being targeted. Right now, I’m handling things through the proper channels and documenting everything on my end. I’m going to keep creating, I’m going to keep being me, and I’m not going to let bad-faith reporting rewrite who I am as a creator. To everyone who’s been supportive, I appreciate you more than I can say. And I want to say this clearly one more time; you can disagree with a creator’s design and still behave like an adult. Bodies aren’t automatically sexual. And using reports as a weapon helps nobody, it just makes people afraid to exist. Please be kind to each other. Please don’t use TOS or report tools as a battering ram. It doesn’t make the community safer, it just makes people afraid to create. I’m going to rest, drink something hot, and try to kick this flu. Thank you for hearing me out. I love you guys. See you soon. And as always, Be Kind. p.s. Shoutout to my protect goat. Thank you for always having my back girly.

Celes Aurion 🐾🎧

28,569 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Moneytaur study blueprint 🗺️ The process I used to go from not knowing what an order block is to pulling cash from the crypto markets in under 6 months using 🎯 Master concepts. Proof of performance, past 120 days👇 Start date: 09/03/2025 Requirements: - A PC/laptop - Wifi - A basic understanding of trading. ( What candlesticks are, how to actually place trades , etc ) - A free mind - Time or the ability to free up time. Starting: - Structure and routine - Stick to that routine + Pre mortem plan. - Notion / Obsidian setup. The first thing you need to create is a clear routine moulded around how you intend to approach this very large and complex task. This will not be linear and you will naturally adapt it as you progress but especially in the beginning some resemblance of structure each day is vital. This is an individual process but it is important to understand from the beginning that this will require a majority of your free time assuming you work a full time Job or study as a student. For me in the beginning this looked like: - Wake up at 6:30. - Shower - Study/work for 1h 45m before leaving for work. - 09:00 -> 17:00 work - 17:30 Exercise / Train - Eat - 19:00 resume study/work - 22:30 Start to wind down and get ready to sleep. It changed several times over the months and especially now I am full time but this is irrelevant, the only thing that matters is sticking with what you choose. Whatever your own routine may look like, it is important to understand it will inevitably require sacrifice. --- The next thing once you have established a draft framework of your routine is ensuring you will actually stick to that routine. Something I implemented which I found particularly beneficial was the concept of a Pre-Mortem plan. This involves creating several scenarios of a future in which you have failed and working backwards from each of these to find where it went wrong. Here is a video which explains it fully: When I did this I came up with 3 scenarios as well as prevention and cure for each. In the 6 months that followed each scenario presented at some point but I was able to catch them early due to having done this. The last thing is to not over complicate this, don't hyper focus on systems and loose momentum optimizing each detail. Just ensure you do the fucking work. I was a little guilty of the above at times, trying to craft the perfect routine. In reality the person who just gets up, drinks too much coffee and works his ass off out performs the workflow perfectionist who visualizes and repeats affirmations, any day of the week. --- Next you need somewhere to store your notes, journal your trades and build your knowledge. For me this was Obsidian but I have also used Notion before and it is an equally viable option. Whichever one of these you choose be warned you will inevitably want to bang your head against a wall trying to use them for the first few days, but they will both click pretty quick and are 100% better options the word document or paper alternative. Here is my full obsidian setup tutorial: Here is a link to MisterPA 's notion Journal: Here is how I create "Meta-Notes" using obsidian: The process: - How I did it. - How I would do it if doing it again. Now I did things the "hard way" and manually worked my way back through each of MT's tweets starting in 2021, reading every one and logging those that I felt where relevant. You can see in my first post: the very first system I used to do this. I quickly adapted though after about a week and focused less on just logging each relevant tweet but trying to find and focusing on those which contained the most information. There where a lot of charts I looked at then skipped over because especially at the start of his timeline they contained little useful information and my time was better spent finding those where there was something to decode. Now this does not mean skip out on "work" just use your time efficiently. -- If however if I was to start from the beginning again with the goal of levelling up technical understanding as quickly as possible I would take a different approach. To start with I would familiarise myself with all relevant SMC concepts, I have linked the best free recourses for this below 👇 CryptoChase beginner friendly index: Barncore's "The Moneytaur Way" series: Gian's Trading bootcamp playlist: Following this I would then work through all of Taur's subscription posts working backwards, recreating his charts and taking notes on his logic. The subscription feed has the highest value density and least noise. Video example of my notes from his subscription posts 👇: --- Okay so now once you have a basic understanding of concepts and can re-recreate them on charts of your own it is time to put this in to practice. The next step is vigorous backtesting, you can use the trading view tool but I think trade Zella offers a more use friendly option if you pay for the subscription. Especially as it allows you to change timeframes without skipping ahead to candle close time of the timeframe you change too ( like Trading view does ) *my only note would be that their LTF/Micro TF data feed with be different to brokerage charts you will use on Trading view, to start with though you should not be going low enough that this is an issue. When you backtest in this context, treat it like real trading. That means journal and logging like you would if real cash was on the line. Take time, do not rush and focus on quality. Stick to BTC, ETH, Major FX pairs or indices as these assets are less reliant on confluence, backtesting a shitcoin is near useless as whether levels work or not will be highly dependent on Majors PA. Go on HTF, scroll back a couple years and try not too look at chart while doing so and then begin. Start with HTF analysis and work down to 2H or wherever you feel comfortable, chart it fully and then identify setups. Make rough notes / plans and then press play, execute the setups as they hit, log and journal trade management as well as observations and key notes. It is very important to not cheat when you do this, do not skip back and adjust your stoploss because it hit by 0.1%, do not skip back and adjust plan because you missed a block and your TP got frontrun. Instead these are the things you journal, embrace these mistakes because they are the cheapest mistakes you are going to make. Grind this, do it for hours, put some music on and enjoy. To start with focus on HTF's, as you get better and start netting $ on paper you can drop the timeframes and increase the difficulty. HTF = Normal, MTF = Medium, LTF = Hard. Even if you do not intend to day trade, learning how to read the lower TF's that force you to think faster, harder and prepare you for lower win rates / loss streaks can greatly improve your ability on higher TF's. While you are doing this as you start to have concepts click you now want to build up your real trading experience, take a sum of money that you care about but will be okay loosing and dedicate this to live trading. Start taking real trades and expect net losses in the beginning. This is where you will make you 2nd cheapest mistakes. This is also where you can begin to learn about your psychology. You may encounter some elements already in backtesting but the real market is where true colours really start to show. Mental issues are inevitable and part of the game, get used to them and start working to identify and fix them. Reading and applying books like Trading in the Zone and Mental Game of Trading are important and will help a lot but there is no easy fix, for some stuff you I believe you just have to get used to it and it goes away with experience. Losses suck at the beginning but after you loose 100 times you starting getting pretty numb to it, same goes for the winners. To accelerate the learning process, build connections and get advice there is also always the option of private groups, while I never personally chose this route and committed to learning everything through my own endeavours there is no denying that having nearly all the information you need structured and compiled in one place is valuable and can save time. Beyond this having access to real time thoughts and opinions of profitable traders can accelerate performance, however it carries the risk of being a double edged sword if not used properly, if relying on it like a crutch and using it as a substitute for real work you will not succeed. With that said if you take it for what it is, a learning opportunity then I believe it can be very beneficial. I am not a member of, nor affiliated with any paid group. There are now many options available within the community, all run by different people with different styles, tailored to different needs. If I was to make a recommendation though, as a non-member, it would be Albert & Co's 618'ers simply due to the diversity in styles of the traders running it and results I have seen from members I know personally. It is important that as you start to trade with real capital you reduce noise in your social feeds or eliminate it all together. You do not need 5 different opinions, you also do not need 2 people telling you the same thing in their own way so you feel re-assured. What you do need is to develop your independent thinking as a trader and be comfortable making different decisions to others, even traders ahead of yourself if it fits with your system or understanding of market. Taur here is perhaps an exception as this is who you are learning from but down the line a real test of your own ability and independence will be being able to stick with your own plan even when it differs from his. Don't get me wrong, counter trading him is retarded but you must learn to adapt his gift to your own style. This will make sense at some point. The next stage is taking your understanding of specific concepts to higher level as you simultaneously snowball experience. Look back through your journal and review where you lost money and made money, do not over extrapolate from a small sample but start to take notes and observe if trends in performance emerge. This is the beginning of the transition to self reliance, you now understand the strategy but must learn for yourself when and where it works. Here you can also learn more nuanced secondary concepts such as VSA, orderflow etc and add these to your game where appropriate. Do NOT get lost in the sauce though and remember mastery of basics is key. IMO a big focus should be understanding correlation thoroughly but especially on HTF's this is the most important thing and what triggers the majority of large swings where most of your cash will be made and losses recovered. Some people will disagree with me here but IMO you should also not be *focusing* on Odd TF's. These are secondary at best and most people overweight their significance leading to avoidable losses while wondering why price did not care about their 327minute Breaker Block which they think is the key to the market. Study Taurs feed and take note of how he mostly uses: 3M, 1M, 3W, 2W, 1W, 5D, 4D, 3D, 2D, 1D, 12H, 8H, 6H, 4H, 2H, 1H, 30m, 15m + micro time frames. The only thing left is time and repetition, you must show up each day and really do this, for months. Maybe you start to see result's, you catch your first key swing and where able to trade where others froze. Congratulations. Learn from these winners and repeat the actions. Find what assets work best for you, find your style, refine and grow. --- The last thing I will include is a short list of tools or links that can be helpful. - Trading view tutorial: - Dictionary: - Market news Calendar: --- Thank you too all those who have read this, I hope this has been helpful for the beginners who want to start but are just not sure how. 🫶 Don't just bookmark this and move on, start 🙃
0:38

Moneytaur study blueprint 🗺️ The process I used to go from not knowing what an order block is to pulling cash from the crypto markets in under 6 months using 🎯 Master concepts. Proof of performance, past 120 days👇 Start date: 09/03/2025 Requirements: - A PC/laptop - Wifi - A basic understanding of trading. ( What candlesticks are, how to actually place trades , etc ) - A free mind - Time or the ability to free up time. Starting: - Structure and routine - Stick to that routine + Pre mortem plan. - Notion / Obsidian setup. The first thing you need to create is a clear routine moulded around how you intend to approach this very large and complex task. This will not be linear and you will naturally adapt it as you progress but especially in the beginning some resemblance of structure each day is vital. This is an individual process but it is important to understand from the beginning that this will require a majority of your free time assuming you work a full time Job or study as a student. For me in the beginning this looked like: - Wake up at 6:30. - Shower - Study/work for 1h 45m before leaving for work. - 09:00 -> 17:00 work - 17:30 Exercise / Train - Eat - 19:00 resume study/work - 22:30 Start to wind down and get ready to sleep. It changed several times over the months and especially now I am full time but this is irrelevant, the only thing that matters is sticking with what you choose. Whatever your own routine may look like, it is important to understand it will inevitably require sacrifice. --- The next thing once you have established a draft framework of your routine is ensuring you will actually stick to that routine. Something I implemented which I found particularly beneficial was the concept of a Pre-Mortem plan. This involves creating several scenarios of a future in which you have failed and working backwards from each of these to find where it went wrong. Here is a video which explains it fully: When I did this I came up with 3 scenarios as well as prevention and cure for each. In the 6 months that followed each scenario presented at some point but I was able to catch them early due to having done this. The last thing is to not over complicate this, don't hyper focus on systems and loose momentum optimizing each detail. Just ensure you do the fucking work. I was a little guilty of the above at times, trying to craft the perfect routine. In reality the person who just gets up, drinks too much coffee and works his ass off out performs the workflow perfectionist who visualizes and repeats affirmations, any day of the week. --- Next you need somewhere to store your notes, journal your trades and build your knowledge. For me this was Obsidian but I have also used Notion before and it is an equally viable option. Whichever one of these you choose be warned you will inevitably want to bang your head against a wall trying to use them for the first few days, but they will both click pretty quick and are 100% better options the word document or paper alternative. Here is my full obsidian setup tutorial: Here is a link to MisterPA 's notion Journal: Here is how I create "Meta-Notes" using obsidian: The process: - How I did it. - How I would do it if doing it again. Now I did things the "hard way" and manually worked my way back through each of MT's tweets starting in 2021, reading every one and logging those that I felt where relevant. You can see in my first post: the very first system I used to do this. I quickly adapted though after about a week and focused less on just logging each relevant tweet but trying to find and focusing on those which contained the most information. There where a lot of charts I looked at then skipped over because especially at the start of his timeline they contained little useful information and my time was better spent finding those where there was something to decode. Now this does not mean skip out on "work" just use your time efficiently. -- If however if I was to start from the beginning again with the goal of levelling up technical understanding as quickly as possible I would take a different approach. To start with I would familiarise myself with all relevant SMC concepts, I have linked the best free recourses for this below 👇 CryptoChase beginner friendly index: Barncore's "The Moneytaur Way" series: Gian's Trading bootcamp playlist: Following this I would then work through all of Taur's subscription posts working backwards, recreating his charts and taking notes on his logic. The subscription feed has the highest value density and least noise. Video example of my notes from his subscription posts 👇: --- Okay so now once you have a basic understanding of concepts and can re-recreate them on charts of your own it is time to put this in to practice. The next step is vigorous backtesting, you can use the trading view tool but I think trade Zella offers a more use friendly option if you pay for the subscription. Especially as it allows you to change timeframes without skipping ahead to candle close time of the timeframe you change too ( like Trading view does ) *my only note would be that their LTF/Micro TF data feed with be different to brokerage charts you will use on Trading view, to start with though you should not be going low enough that this is an issue. When you backtest in this context, treat it like real trading. That means journal and logging like you would if real cash was on the line. Take time, do not rush and focus on quality. Stick to BTC, ETH, Major FX pairs or indices as these assets are less reliant on confluence, backtesting a shitcoin is near useless as whether levels work or not will be highly dependent on Majors PA. Go on HTF, scroll back a couple years and try not too look at chart while doing so and then begin. Start with HTF analysis and work down to 2H or wherever you feel comfortable, chart it fully and then identify setups. Make rough notes / plans and then press play, execute the setups as they hit, log and journal trade management as well as observations and key notes. It is very important to not cheat when you do this, do not skip back and adjust your stoploss because it hit by 0.1%, do not skip back and adjust plan because you missed a block and your TP got frontrun. Instead these are the things you journal, embrace these mistakes because they are the cheapest mistakes you are going to make. Grind this, do it for hours, put some music on and enjoy. To start with focus on HTF's, as you get better and start netting $ on paper you can drop the timeframes and increase the difficulty. HTF = Normal, MTF = Medium, LTF = Hard. Even if you do not intend to day trade, learning how to read the lower TF's that force you to think faster, harder and prepare you for lower win rates / loss streaks can greatly improve your ability on higher TF's. While you are doing this as you start to have concepts click you now want to build up your real trading experience, take a sum of money that you care about but will be okay loosing and dedicate this to live trading. Start taking real trades and expect net losses in the beginning. This is where you will make you 2nd cheapest mistakes. This is also where you can begin to learn about your psychology. You may encounter some elements already in backtesting but the real market is where true colours really start to show. Mental issues are inevitable and part of the game, get used to them and start working to identify and fix them. Reading and applying books like Trading in the Zone and Mental Game of Trading are important and will help a lot but there is no easy fix, for some stuff you I believe you just have to get used to it and it goes away with experience. Losses suck at the beginning but after you loose 100 times you starting getting pretty numb to it, same goes for the winners. To accelerate the learning process, build connections and get advice there is also always the option of private groups, while I never personally chose this route and committed to learning everything through my own endeavours there is no denying that having nearly all the information you need structured and compiled in one place is valuable and can save time. Beyond this having access to real time thoughts and opinions of profitable traders can accelerate performance, however it carries the risk of being a double edged sword if not used properly, if relying on it like a crutch and using it as a substitute for real work you will not succeed. With that said if you take it for what it is, a learning opportunity then I believe it can be very beneficial. I am not a member of, nor affiliated with any paid group. There are now many options available within the community, all run by different people with different styles, tailored to different needs. If I was to make a recommendation though, as a non-member, it would be Albert & Co's 618'ers simply due to the diversity in styles of the traders running it and results I have seen from members I know personally. It is important that as you start to trade with real capital you reduce noise in your social feeds or eliminate it all together. You do not need 5 different opinions, you also do not need 2 people telling you the same thing in their own way so you feel re-assured. What you do need is to develop your independent thinking as a trader and be comfortable making different decisions to others, even traders ahead of yourself if it fits with your system or understanding of market. Taur here is perhaps an exception as this is who you are learning from but down the line a real test of your own ability and independence will be being able to stick with your own plan even when it differs from his. Don't get me wrong, counter trading him is retarded but you must learn to adapt his gift to your own style. This will make sense at some point. The next stage is taking your understanding of specific concepts to higher level as you simultaneously snowball experience. Look back through your journal and review where you lost money and made money, do not over extrapolate from a small sample but start to take notes and observe if trends in performance emerge. This is the beginning of the transition to self reliance, you now understand the strategy but must learn for yourself when and where it works. Here you can also learn more nuanced secondary concepts such as VSA, orderflow etc and add these to your game where appropriate. Do NOT get lost in the sauce though and remember mastery of basics is key. IMO a big focus should be understanding correlation thoroughly but especially on HTF's this is the most important thing and what triggers the majority of large swings where most of your cash will be made and losses recovered. Some people will disagree with me here but IMO you should also not be *focusing* on Odd TF's. These are secondary at best and most people overweight their significance leading to avoidable losses while wondering why price did not care about their 327minute Breaker Block which they think is the key to the market. Study Taurs feed and take note of how he mostly uses: 3M, 1M, 3W, 2W, 1W, 5D, 4D, 3D, 2D, 1D, 12H, 8H, 6H, 4H, 2H, 1H, 30m, 15m + micro time frames. The only thing left is time and repetition, you must show up each day and really do this, for months. Maybe you start to see result's, you catch your first key swing and where able to trade where others froze. Congratulations. Learn from these winners and repeat the actions. Find what assets work best for you, find your style, refine and grow. --- The last thing I will include is a short list of tools or links that can be helpful. - Trading view tutorial: - Dictionary: - Market news Calendar: --- Thank you too all those who have read this, I hope this has been helpful for the beginners who want to start but are just not sure how. 🫶 Don't just bookmark this and move on, start 🙃

Ace

45,185 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Hard to believe it’s been five years since Mark Cook (Mark Cook), longtime Bucs and PewterReport 🏴‍☠️ beat writer, left us suddenly and unexpectedly at the age of 50. Seeing Mark live out his dream of covering the Bucs for over a decade was truly special. He did it with unrivaled enthusiasm and a flair all his own. You could feel this in every piece he wrote, every “What’s Cooking with Mark Cook” video he did, on every Pewter Report podcast and when he took the mic on 98.7 The Fan radio. But what I hold onto most: the way he made everyone around him feel a sense of belonging, and his care for others. Getting into this business (and staying there) can be rough. But Mark was always the first to extend his hand and introduce himself. I can remember so many times he’d stay late into the evenings at One Buc helping a young reporter with a notebook or giving an ear to someone who simply needed it. I was so excited for him when he began working as a teacher at Connecticut School of Broadcasting and honored when he asked a few of us to come speak to his class. Mark genuinely cared about the people around him and not just the surface-level things. He wanted to really know how you were doing and how your family was doing. He spoke proudly of his son Douglas and so lovingly of his partner Daisey Charlotte. And he put together some legendary Thanksgiving BBQ celebrations. The Bucs honored him with a special video board tribute and reserved this seat for him, including his chef’s hat 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺. Bruce Arians called him a “dear friend and a hell of a professional. Mike Evans said, “We loved him in the locker room. I loved him.” Pro Football Writers Tampa chapter renamed our annual “Good Guy Award” in his honor. Thank you to Greg Auman for so thoughtfully doing this. It’s presented to the player who is most helpful and cooperative with local media. We’ve gotten to a point where the guys now winning this award, like Tristan Wirfs, never had the chance to sit down and talk to him. Gosh he would have loved that. That saddens me, but it also gives me and others a chance to speak of how truly special he was, how much pride he took in this job and how he didn’t take a single moment on this earth for granted. His final good deed on this earth was that in lieu of flowers, his family requested donations be made to the Arians Foundation to help foster children, a cause very dear to his heart.
0:45

Hard to believe it’s been five years since Mark Cook (Mark Cook), longtime Bucs and PewterReport 🏴‍☠️ beat writer, left us suddenly and unexpectedly at the age of 50. Seeing Mark live out his dream of covering the Bucs for over a decade was truly special. He did it with unrivaled enthusiasm and a flair all his own. You could feel this in every piece he wrote, every “What’s Cooking with Mark Cook” video he did, on every Pewter Report podcast and when he took the mic on 98.7 The Fan radio. But what I hold onto most: the way he made everyone around him feel a sense of belonging, and his care for others. Getting into this business (and staying there) can be rough. But Mark was always the first to extend his hand and introduce himself. I can remember so many times he’d stay late into the evenings at One Buc helping a young reporter with a notebook or giving an ear to someone who simply needed it. I was so excited for him when he began working as a teacher at Connecticut School of Broadcasting and honored when he asked a few of us to come speak to his class. Mark genuinely cared about the people around him and not just the surface-level things. He wanted to really know how you were doing and how your family was doing. He spoke proudly of his son Douglas and so lovingly of his partner Daisey Charlotte. And he put together some legendary Thanksgiving BBQ celebrations. The Bucs honored him with a special video board tribute and reserved this seat for him, including his chef’s hat 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺. Bruce Arians called him a “dear friend and a hell of a professional. Mike Evans said, “We loved him in the locker room. I loved him.” Pro Football Writers Tampa chapter renamed our annual “Good Guy Award” in his honor. Thank you to Greg Auman for so thoughtfully doing this. It’s presented to the player who is most helpful and cooperative with local media. We’ve gotten to a point where the guys now winning this award, like Tristan Wirfs, never had the chance to sit down and talk to him. Gosh he would have loved that. That saddens me, but it also gives me and others a chance to speak of how truly special he was, how much pride he took in this job and how he didn’t take a single moment on this earth for granted. His final good deed on this earth was that in lieu of flowers, his family requested donations be made to the Arians Foundation to help foster children, a cause very dear to his heart.

JennaLaineESPN

19,049 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Woot woot! THE BIG DAY IS HERE. Eddie AI v2! Download it: It’s been a sprint pace to cover a marathon distance. We launched Eddie AI v1 in October last year. Thousands of new users. Lots of feature requests. Learned a ton. (Yes, Paul Graham is right: ship early and often!) Eddie AI v2 releases three big advancements. And underpinning those decisions are the learnings baked in. 1. Eddie now runs locally on Macs and Windows. Our native apps are out of beta and available to everyone. Video is large. The video files used by video professionals are even larger. No one wants to wait around uploading. Native applications make it MUCH MUCH faster to import and thus much faster to get on with editing. One of the challenges with Eddie is how do we *quickly* get the user to aha – that moment where they can see the magic of this assistant AI video editor – if it takes awhile to upload files. These native applications are a big step towards getting to aha, swiftly, and help deliver on our promise to save customers time. 2. Analyze raw footage, aka logging interviews and B-rolls. Eddie v1 only created edits. But users were asking for a step before the edit too. They want their footage logged – what happened in this shot, who said what, etc – and grouped logically with this metadata back in their video editing application. We released a test of this a month ago. Users were blown away by the accuracy of the AI, the rich descriptions, and how the metadata seamlessly is sent to their video editing application where they can find the right shot when they need. We were blown away by the usage of this feature. Logging is now updated and released to all in v2. 3. Rough cut mode. This is the big dream: Eddie is the AI assistant video editor. There’s a lot of tedious work in video editing. Eddie takes it on. And helps you get to a great story faster. Sorting through hours of interviews and finding great soundbites that can be cut together to form a coherent story is a big step toward this dream. We attempted to do this in v1. But the prompt box was too open ended. People were typing in things like “Cut me a great story” and the subjectivity of the statement led to variable results. So we re-thought the story crafting process. We added friction. YES you read that correctly. We added friction into the product that slows the customer down. BUT they get much better results, reliably. And that trade-off is well worth it. Eddie now takes a step-by-step approach with you on crafting your story. It aligns with you on the story framework and then cuts chapter by chapter with your feedback. What used to take days, now takes minutes. We spent months hacking at LLMs to make them able to provide coherent edits over a longer duration and handle a large amount of source material (aka context-window problem). It’s ready for release. Version 2.0 is here. Download Eddie at
3:48

Woot woot! THE BIG DAY IS HERE. Eddie AI v2! Download it: It’s been a sprint pace to cover a marathon distance. We launched Eddie AI v1 in October last year. Thousands of new users. Lots of feature requests. Learned a ton. (Yes, Paul Graham is right: ship early and often!) Eddie AI v2 releases three big advancements. And underpinning those decisions are the learnings baked in. 1. Eddie now runs locally on Macs and Windows. Our native apps are out of beta and available to everyone. Video is large. The video files used by video professionals are even larger. No one wants to wait around uploading. Native applications make it MUCH MUCH faster to import and thus much faster to get on with editing. One of the challenges with Eddie is how do we *quickly* get the user to aha – that moment where they can see the magic of this assistant AI video editor – if it takes awhile to upload files. These native applications are a big step towards getting to aha, swiftly, and help deliver on our promise to save customers time. 2. Analyze raw footage, aka logging interviews and B-rolls. Eddie v1 only created edits. But users were asking for a step before the edit too. They want their footage logged – what happened in this shot, who said what, etc – and grouped logically with this metadata back in their video editing application. We released a test of this a month ago. Users were blown away by the accuracy of the AI, the rich descriptions, and how the metadata seamlessly is sent to their video editing application where they can find the right shot when they need. We were blown away by the usage of this feature. Logging is now updated and released to all in v2. 3. Rough cut mode. This is the big dream: Eddie is the AI assistant video editor. There’s a lot of tedious work in video editing. Eddie takes it on. And helps you get to a great story faster. Sorting through hours of interviews and finding great soundbites that can be cut together to form a coherent story is a big step toward this dream. We attempted to do this in v1. But the prompt box was too open ended. People were typing in things like “Cut me a great story” and the subjectivity of the statement led to variable results. So we re-thought the story crafting process. We added friction. YES you read that correctly. We added friction into the product that slows the customer down. BUT they get much better results, reliably. And that trade-off is well worth it. Eddie now takes a step-by-step approach with you on crafting your story. It aligns with you on the story framework and then cuts chapter by chapter with your feedback. What used to take days, now takes minutes. We spent months hacking at LLMs to make them able to provide coherent edits over a longer duration and handle a large amount of source material (aka context-window problem). It’s ready for release. Version 2.0 is here. Download Eddie at

Shamir Allibhai

57,672 просмотров • 1 год назад

Google just confirmed the first case of hackers using AI to build a zero-day exploit from scratch. An actual zero-day vulnerability that no human had EVER found before, discovered by an AI model, turned into a working weapon, and aimed at a mass exploitation campaign targeting thousands of systems simultaneously. Google's Threat Intelligence Group caught it yesterday and killed the operation before it scaled. But the details of how it worked are genuinely scary: The AI found a flaw in a popular two-factor authentication system that traditional security tools had missed entirely. The vulnerability was a logic error buried deep in the authentication flow where a developer had hard-coded a trust exception years ago. No human security researcher or automated scanner had caught it. The flaw was invisible to EVERY tool the cybersecurity industry has built over the past two decades. But the AI spotted it immediately. Then it wrote a full Python exploit script to weaponize it. Google's analysts could tell the code was AI-generated because it had textbook formatting, educational comments explaining every function, and even a hallucinated severity score that doesn't exist in any real database. The AI literally graded its own attack with a fake rating. So the code had MISTAKES in it. The criminals' implementation was clumsy enough that it probably interfered with the actual deployment. This was the sloppy first attempt by people who are still learning how to use these tools. And it still found a vulnerability that the entire cybersecurity industry missed. Google's chief threat analyst John Hultquist said: "There's a misconception that the AI vulnerability race is imminent. The reality is that it's already begun. For every zero-day we can trace back to AI, there are probably many more out there." But here's where it gets truly insane... This wasn't even a sophisticated operation. North Korea's APT45 hacking unit is sending thousands of repetitive prompts to AI models, recursively analyzing known vulnerabilities and building an entire exploit arsenal that would be physically impossible for human hackers to assemble at the same speed. They're essentially industrializing cyberattacks. A Chinese state-linked group jailbroke Google's own Gemini by simply asking it to "pretend to be a network security expert" and then used that persona to research how to hack TP-Link routers and corporate file transfer systems. Another Chinese group deployed autonomous AI agents that probed a Japanese tech firm with minimal human oversight, deciding on their own which tools to use and pivoting between targets based on internal reasoning. And then there's PROMPTSPY, an Android backdoor that calls Google's Gemini API to read your phone screen in real time, navigate your interface autonomously, capture your biometric data, replay your lock screen PIN, and block you from uninstalling it by placing an invisible overlay over the uninstall button. It literally OPERATES your phone using commercial AI tools anyone can access. Everyone spent the last 3 years arguing about whether AI would take people's jobs. Meanwhile AI is making every password, every firewall, and every two-factor authentication system on Earth fundamentally less secure. The entire $190 billion cybersecurity industry was built on one assumption: that finding vulnerabilities is hard and requires deep expertise. But AI just removed that assumption from the equation. And the scariest part is that Google said the criminals made errors this time. The implementation was rough and the campaign probably didn't fully work. These were amateurs, now imagine what professionals are able to do. There's a reason Sam Altman predicted an inevitable massive cyberattack THIS year. What do you think?
1:45

Google just confirmed the first case of hackers using AI to build a zero-day exploit from scratch. An actual zero-day vulnerability that no human had EVER found before, discovered by an AI model, turned into a working weapon, and aimed at a mass exploitation campaign targeting thousands of systems simultaneously. Google's Threat Intelligence Group caught it yesterday and killed the operation before it scaled. But the details of how it worked are genuinely scary: The AI found a flaw in a popular two-factor authentication system that traditional security tools had missed entirely. The vulnerability was a logic error buried deep in the authentication flow where a developer had hard-coded a trust exception years ago. No human security researcher or automated scanner had caught it. The flaw was invisible to EVERY tool the cybersecurity industry has built over the past two decades. But the AI spotted it immediately. Then it wrote a full Python exploit script to weaponize it. Google's analysts could tell the code was AI-generated because it had textbook formatting, educational comments explaining every function, and even a hallucinated severity score that doesn't exist in any real database. The AI literally graded its own attack with a fake rating. So the code had MISTAKES in it. The criminals' implementation was clumsy enough that it probably interfered with the actual deployment. This was the sloppy first attempt by people who are still learning how to use these tools. And it still found a vulnerability that the entire cybersecurity industry missed. Google's chief threat analyst John Hultquist said: "There's a misconception that the AI vulnerability race is imminent. The reality is that it's already begun. For every zero-day we can trace back to AI, there are probably many more out there." But here's where it gets truly insane... This wasn't even a sophisticated operation. North Korea's APT45 hacking unit is sending thousands of repetitive prompts to AI models, recursively analyzing known vulnerabilities and building an entire exploit arsenal that would be physically impossible for human hackers to assemble at the same speed. They're essentially industrializing cyberattacks. A Chinese state-linked group jailbroke Google's own Gemini by simply asking it to "pretend to be a network security expert" and then used that persona to research how to hack TP-Link routers and corporate file transfer systems. Another Chinese group deployed autonomous AI agents that probed a Japanese tech firm with minimal human oversight, deciding on their own which tools to use and pivoting between targets based on internal reasoning. And then there's PROMPTSPY, an Android backdoor that calls Google's Gemini API to read your phone screen in real time, navigate your interface autonomously, capture your biometric data, replay your lock screen PIN, and block you from uninstalling it by placing an invisible overlay over the uninstall button. It literally OPERATES your phone using commercial AI tools anyone can access. Everyone spent the last 3 years arguing about whether AI would take people's jobs. Meanwhile AI is making every password, every firewall, and every two-factor authentication system on Earth fundamentally less secure. The entire $190 billion cybersecurity industry was built on one assumption: that finding vulnerabilities is hard and requires deep expertise. But AI just removed that assumption from the equation. And the scariest part is that Google said the criminals made errors this time. The implementation was rough and the campaign probably didn't fully work. These were amateurs, now imagine what professionals are able to do. There's a reason Sam Altman predicted an inevitable massive cyberattack THIS year. What do you think?

Ricardo

50,564 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

And there we have it. Tomorrow Andy Burnham will become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, having blazed a singular trail to No. 10 that avoided ever having to defend, let alone stand on the Labour manifesto of the 2024 general election. Already, the total unfitness of the man for high office is beginning to be noticed, with a particularly striking online meme comparing his cringe-Dad antics to those of David Brent. Just how quickly his twee and cloying bonhomie falls apart on contact with the realities of political power we'll find out from next week. For my guest this week, Michael Murphy , Burnham is an even more dangerous figure to put in charge of the country than Sir Keir Starmer. The two represent either side of the same coin: while Starmer's dour legalism represented the underlying mechanics of the British state in all its brute force (the man was never more at home than when clamping down furiously on dissenting speech), Burnham is the smiling, matey facade that that state presents to the public; the tie-less, "call me Andy" school teacher who sits on a chair backwards to explain how he "gets it". But while Starmer included in his team some people who did recognise the priorities of the British working class, for example Morgan McSweeney, Burnham has swept to power on the back of the worst instincts of the already spectacularly inept Parliamentary Labour Party; a gang of charity-sector charlatans so clueless about the real world that they'd be more at home in a playschool. We must prepare for a very rough couple of years with this man at the helm. The world is rapidly becoming more dangerous, Britain is exposed and our enemies know it. The one possible silver lining we can take is that when Andy Burnham fails, perhaps the public will finally realise that that failure will not just be his own, but the failure of the entire Labour Party.
50:46

And there we have it. Tomorrow Andy Burnham will become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, having blazed a singular trail to No. 10 that avoided ever having to defend, let alone stand on the Labour manifesto of the 2024 general election. Already, the total unfitness of the man for high office is beginning to be noticed, with a particularly striking online meme comparing his cringe-Dad antics to those of David Brent. Just how quickly his twee and cloying bonhomie falls apart on contact with the realities of political power we'll find out from next week. For my guest this week, Michael Murphy , Burnham is an even more dangerous figure to put in charge of the country than Sir Keir Starmer. The two represent either side of the same coin: while Starmer's dour legalism represented the underlying mechanics of the British state in all its brute force (the man was never more at home than when clamping down furiously on dissenting speech), Burnham is the smiling, matey facade that that state presents to the public; the tie-less, "call me Andy" school teacher who sits on a chair backwards to explain how he "gets it". But while Starmer included in his team some people who did recognise the priorities of the British working class, for example Morgan McSweeney, Burnham has swept to power on the back of the worst instincts of the already spectacularly inept Parliamentary Labour Party; a gang of charity-sector charlatans so clueless about the real world that they'd be more at home in a playschool. We must prepare for a very rough couple of years with this man at the helm. The world is rapidly becoming more dangerous, Britain is exposed and our enemies know it. The one possible silver lining we can take is that when Andy Burnham fails, perhaps the public will finally realise that that failure will not just be his own, but the failure of the entire Labour Party.

David Starkey

204,766 просмотров • 29 дней назад