正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨Whoa Eric Davis's Spilling The Beans, This Guy Has No Chill When Davis talks about investigating UAPs and legacy programs, he's very clear that this wasn't done from the sidelines. At NIDS he was part of the scientific core, backed by a world class advisory board that included Hal... Puthoff, Jacques Vallee, Edgar Mitchell, Jack Schmitt, senior Los Alamos physicists, and figures with deep backgrounds in nuclear engineering, psychology, and advanced technology. That puts the work in a very different category than most public UAP research. After NIDS, Davis moved directly into contract work for the Air Force Research Laboratory, specifically within advanced concepts programs. These weren't just observational roles. They were exploratory, future facing physics efforts, exactly the kind of environments where unconventional data and legacy issues surface behind the scenes, and certainly not publicly. By the mid 2000s, Davis was working directly under Hal Puthoff, while simultaneously participating in government funded and industry funded advanced physics research. That's the point where government, defense contractors, and frontier theoretical work intersect and where compartmented knowledge tends to migrate, but not disappear. When the DIA's Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) began, Davis and Puthoff were formally deputized, with DIA letters authorizing access, security credentials acknowledged, and explicit "need to know" status for UAP related classified information. Their task was to locate programs, extract technical insight, and determine whether meaningful physics had already been uncovered. While working on quantum vacuum and advanced energy concepts with Lockheed Martin's Advanced Technology Center, a senior vice president operating officially, inside a SCIF disclosed his direct involvement in a crash retrieval program spanning decades. He operated as part of a controlled, classified disclosure between cleared professionals. This is why Davis keeps emphasizing process. This information was accumulated through credentialed work, authorized access, and long term professional trust. That's also why he's careful about what he says publicly. He's not trying to persuade anyone. He's drawing a line between what he knows, how he knows it, and what can be discussed without violating classification. You don't have to accept every implication to understand the significance of this. What Davis is describing is not belief driven disclosure. It's institutional memory surfacing through people who were formally tasked to look for it. #UAP #UAPDisclosure #EricDavis #AATIP #AAWSAP #NIDS #GovernmentSecrecy #AdvancedPhysics #NationalSecurity #FollowTheData #UAPHistory #Transparency Source:show more

Skywatch Signal

103,000 subscribers

15,245 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

⾨ 🛸👽 Is Dr. Hal Puthoff a True Insider and Gatekeeper? 👽🛸 ⾨ "It SEEMS like there is that crash retrieval program." ~HP "I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program." ~HP ~ Gerb on Fresh Freedom Podcast: "At the UAPDF → Disclosure Foundation event, you (Puthoff) stated, if you revealed everything you knew about the subject, you would go to jail. So, I'm gonna take that as assuming you may have worked in a specific-national-program capacity on such projects of exotic, or technologies of unknown origin." (It's well known that Puthoff was involved, via his company, EarthTech, as a subcontractor in the UFO program, AAWSAP. He was the Senior Science Advisor. He was also involved with the follow-up effort (not an official program) known as AATIP. And yes, much of what they worked on was classified, and as far as we know, that's still the case today. So, Puthoff just can't share all that he knows or learned from that, or he could go to jail. In theory. Was Puthoff read into some other UFO-related program or SAP that he's just not telling us about? It seems like that's what Gerb was insinuating. My opinion? I don't think so. And Puthoff explained where his knowledge comes from in this interview from January of 2025. Did Gerb not see this?) Dr. Hal Puthoff: "Well, a program like that, crash retrievals, and so on, and deep analysis. I mean, this is something that, if it's occurring, you know, is still behind the scenes and highly classified." (IF it's occurring.) Puthoff: "However, I've interacted with the various intelligence officers who've been given the job, officially - actual official jobs - to dig out what's true about the so-called Legacy programs and crash retrievals and so on." (He's saying that his knowledge of any UFO-related Legacy programs (including anything on crash retrievals) is based on what other people have told him.) Puthoff: "People like David Grusch, who appeared before Congress, under oath, and he made the statement that, in fact, there is a Legacy program, we do have access to crash-retrieved craft, even crash-retrieved biologics. Knowing him and where he came from...he was at the National Reconnaissance Office, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, at the highest level of clearances." (Grusch is one person Puthoff references as a source for details on the alleged crash retrieval program. And as Grusch has said, most of what he (Grusch) learned was from talking to others who claimed they were firsthand folks who worked IN the Legacy program. Grusch sent some of those folks to the Inspector General so they could share what they know. So, with this specific information (minus whatever photos or reports Grusch saw), Grusch is a second hand witness and Puthoff is a third hand "witness." Puthoff: "[Grusch] interviewed, as he claimed in his statement before Congress, over 40 individuals over a four-year period, and all this data was collected together, and it seems like there is that crash retrieval program." (Even Hal uses the word "claimed" with Grusch, and he also uses words that tell us (unless you're going to accuse him of lying) that he has NOT been read into any of those programs. "Seems like there is that crash retrieval program." SEEMS.) Puthoff: "So although I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program..." (Pretty important sentence right there. He has heard things from folks (like the late Jim Ryder of Lockheed?) who claimed to have worked in that program, but he hasn't officially been read in or had to sign any NDAs, so he can speak about some of it. See my post from yesterday where Grusch says he's lucky he never signed an NDA or he would have had to keep his mouth shut.) Puthoff: "...I've interacted with people like Grusch and many others whose...I just simply can't say I'm not hearing the truth. So, I would put my stamp on the idea that there is such a program." (He's making a judgment on what he has been told. Obviously, I can't 100% rule out that Puthoff hasn't had SOME access to some of this information, and maybe he's seen the same photos that Grusch and Davis have referenced, and Bigelow has hinted at in one of his interviews with George Knapp. But I don't believe Puthoff is on the very inside and just pretending that he's not. We still have yet to hear from someone who worked in those programs, hands on. And yes, I know Puthoff seemed confused when Gerb asked him about the Legacy program being shut down and the timing related to that. I hope The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford asks Eric Davis about that today. Play the clip of it for Eric. And I also know that sometimes, based on Puthoff's words, it seems like he may be a firsthand witness, but I think that's him just being casual with his words. This interview from 2025 makes it pretty clear how he learned all of this information, or alleged information. My Opinion: Dr. Hal Puthoff has never been on the inside of any UFO-related Legacy program and he is NOT a gatekeeper.)

⾨ 🛸👽 Is Dr. Hal Puthoff a True Insider and Gatekeeper? 👽🛸 ⾨ "It SEEMS like there is that crash retrieval program." ~HP "I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program." ~HP ~ Gerb on Fresh Freedom Podcast: "At the UAPDF → Disclosure Foundation event, you (Puthoff) stated, if you revealed everything you knew about the subject, you would go to jail. So, I'm gonna take that as assuming you may have worked in a specific-national-program capacity on such projects of exotic, or technologies of unknown origin." (It's well known that Puthoff was involved, via his company, EarthTech, as a subcontractor in the UFO program, AAWSAP. He was the Senior Science Advisor. He was also involved with the follow-up effort (not an official program) known as AATIP. And yes, much of what they worked on was classified, and as far as we know, that's still the case today. So, Puthoff just can't share all that he knows or learned from that, or he could go to jail. In theory. Was Puthoff read into some other UFO-related program or SAP that he's just not telling us about? It seems like that's what Gerb was insinuating. My opinion? I don't think so. And Puthoff explained where his knowledge comes from in this interview from January of 2025. Did Gerb not see this?) Dr. Hal Puthoff: "Well, a program like that, crash retrievals, and so on, and deep analysis. I mean, this is something that, if it's occurring, you know, is still behind the scenes and highly classified." (IF it's occurring.) Puthoff: "However, I've interacted with the various intelligence officers who've been given the job, officially - actual official jobs - to dig out what's true about the so-called Legacy programs and crash retrievals and so on." (He's saying that his knowledge of any UFO-related Legacy programs (including anything on crash retrievals) is based on what other people have told him.) Puthoff: "People like David Grusch, who appeared before Congress, under oath, and he made the statement that, in fact, there is a Legacy program, we do have access to crash-retrieved craft, even crash-retrieved biologics. Knowing him and where he came from...he was at the National Reconnaissance Office, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, at the highest level of clearances." (Grusch is one person Puthoff references as a source for details on the alleged crash retrieval program. And as Grusch has said, most of what he (Grusch) learned was from talking to others who claimed they were firsthand folks who worked IN the Legacy program. Grusch sent some of those folks to the Inspector General so they could share what they know. So, with this specific information (minus whatever photos or reports Grusch saw), Grusch is a second hand witness and Puthoff is a third hand "witness." Puthoff: "[Grusch] interviewed, as he claimed in his statement before Congress, over 40 individuals over a four-year period, and all this data was collected together, and it seems like there is that crash retrieval program." (Even Hal uses the word "claimed" with Grusch, and he also uses words that tell us (unless you're going to accuse him of lying) that he has NOT been read into any of those programs. "Seems like there is that crash retrieval program." SEEMS.) Puthoff: "So although I can't say that I personally have been absolutely briefed on the crash retrieval program..." (Pretty important sentence right there. He has heard things from folks (like the late Jim Ryder of Lockheed?) who claimed to have worked in that program, but he hasn't officially been read in or had to sign any NDAs, so he can speak about some of it. See my post from yesterday where Grusch says he's lucky he never signed an NDA or he would have had to keep his mouth shut.) Puthoff: "...I've interacted with people like Grusch and many others whose...I just simply can't say I'm not hearing the truth. So, I would put my stamp on the idea that there is such a program." (He's making a judgment on what he has been told. Obviously, I can't 100% rule out that Puthoff hasn't had SOME access to some of this information, and maybe he's seen the same photos that Grusch and Davis have referenced, and Bigelow has hinted at in one of his interviews with George Knapp. But I don't believe Puthoff is on the very inside and just pretending that he's not. We still have yet to hear from someone who worked in those programs, hands on. And yes, I know Puthoff seemed confused when Gerb asked him about the Legacy program being shut down and the timing related to that. I hope The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford asks Eric Davis about that today. Play the clip of it for Eric. And I also know that sometimes, based on Puthoff's words, it seems like he may be a firsthand witness, but I think that's him just being casual with his words. This interview from 2025 makes it pretty clear how he learned all of this information, or alleged information. My Opinion: Dr. Hal Puthoff has never been on the inside of any UFO-related Legacy program and he is NOT a gatekeeper.)

Joe Murgia

19,680 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: Two of the most technically qualified scientists to ever engage with the UFO mystery sat down together for the first time: Dr. Eric Davis, astrophysics PhD who formally investigated the crash retrieval program through classified government channels and Dr. Eric Weinstein (), Harvard math PhD and founder of physics theory, Geometric Unity. Davis confirms that he personally interviewed 5 direct crash retrieval program employees at two legacy aerospace companies (one being TRW, acquired by Northrop) and that the United States holds between 10 and 40 UFOs in its direct possession. He also describes discussing UFOs with George H.W. Bush directly and Jimmy Carter getting briefed on the subject. Finally, Davis says the program only consists of Aerospace engineers. Weinstein's response: if these craft of non-human origin defy the laws of physics, you need top theoretical physicists on the program. Weinstein says either the people running it are criminally incompetent or there are no craft. Sparks flew.🚨 This is the conversation I have been trying to make happen for years. Eric Davis is one of the most credentialed investigator of the UFO crash retrieval program alive with an eidetic memory. Astrophysics PhD from the University of Arizona, 30 years in the field, security clearances through AAWSAP, formally deputized by the DIA under program manager James Lacatski (who himself claims he has stepped inside a UFO and breached the hull). Eric Weinstein is one of the most technically gifted minds outside the classified world, someone Davis himself identified as one of only three people technical and heterodox enough to engage with this material. I put them in a room and let them go at it. This conversation was nothing short of historic. Bombshell Details: Davis Says Roswell Was Real and He Confirmed It Officially: Davis traces his investigation to 1996 at Robert Bigelow's NIDS. Astronaut Ed Mitchell told him Admiral Thomas Wilson, then J2 on the Joint Chiefs, independently verified the 1947 Corona crash was a real non-human craft. Davis later used his DIA credentials through AAWSAP to reach the programmatic level of the operation. His conviction: 100%. Weinstein says he has talked to too many credible people to dismiss it, but has never seen one piece of incontrovertible proof. Davis Interviewed Program Workers. None Were Physicists: Davis met five people from one legacy aerospace company on the program. A material scientist who spent two decades on it. A TRW source who ran the SCIF at Wright-Patterson with access to intact craft in a secured hangar. Not one of Grusch's 40 firsthand witnesses is a theoretical physicist. Davis confirms none of his contacts were either. Weinstein compares this to performing Beethoven's Fifth with accountants and boxers. Eight Decades of Reverse Engineering. Zero Results: Davis's senior VP source confirmed no functional progress after eight decades. They could see how craft were constructed at the nanoscale. Could not reproduce any of it. Davis asked: where are your physicists? Answer: we never had any. Weinstein calls this a two-line proof. If it defies the laws of physics and you have no physicists, you are either the dumbest operation in history or there is nothing to reverse engineer. Weinstein Tells Davis His Physics Won't Work: Davis has published on warp drives and traversable wormholes within general relativity. Weinstein tells him directly: none of it will work. Davis accepts this. Weinstein says if craft break known physics, the answer is not squeezing exotic scenarios out of Einstein. The answer is Einstein is incomplete. Davis agrees. The debate becomes a collaboration. The Golden Age of Gravity Research Vanished in the 1970s: Weinstein identifies a 1971 Australian intelligence document naming physicists like Arnowitt, Desser, Dyson, and Oppenheimer in what reads like a Manhattan Project for Gravity and exotic propulsion. Two apparent cutouts funded work through Bryce DeWitt at UNC and Lewis Witten at a facility called RIAS inside the Martin Company. Sheldon Glashow and Solomon Lefschitz worked there. Then the trail goes cold. Davis noticed the same disappearance in graduate school. No one had an answer. String Theory as a Weapon Against Frontier Physics: After a Princeton junior designed a working atomic weapon from public sources, theoretical physics became too dangerous to leave in the open. String theory consumed the field. 42 years, zero experimental predictions. The Biden White House told Andreessen and Horowitz directly that entire areas of physics were classified in the nuclear era. Davis says he always thought string theory's dominance and the absence of physicists on the crash retrieval program were connected. Weinstein agrees. Weinstein Finds Gravity Hidden in the Strong Nuclear Force: Lazar's "gravity wave A" claim sounds like garbage. Weinstein treats it as garbled proximity information. He identifies a formal possibility: the theta term from QCD, based on the Pontriagin class, transgresses to a Chern-Simons functional: the closest known Lagrangian to Einstein-Hilbert, which governs gravity. Davis calls it remarkable. Weinstein believes this is the first time the connection has been stated publicly. Renaissance Technologies as the Possible Physics Brain Trust: If a secret physics program exists, track where frontier physicists cluster. Renaissance Technologies hires differential geometers and topologists. Sits next to Brookhaven National Lab. Draws from SUNY Stony Brook, where C.N. Yang was based. Returns resemble state-sponsored performance. Weinstein told Jim Simons before his death that Chern-Simons theory is the closest Lagrangian to Einstein-Hilbert. Simons invited him to Stony Brook for a year, then asked where he would find the funding. He was worth over $20 billion. The Wilson-Davis Notes Are Confirmed Authentic: Davis confirms the typewritten notes are real, legitimate, and 100% accurate. They describe former J2 Admiral Wilson being denied access to a crash retrieval program inside a private aerospace company funded from his own DIA budget. He was told he lacked need-to-know and met with Davis out of frustration. Davis wants blanket immunity to say everything about this meeting but confirms the notes are real. Why This Matters: These two arrive from opposite directions and land on the same problem. Davis has total certainty non-human craft exist in American possession. Weinstein cannot construct a single theory that explains the full landscape of claims and missing evidence. Both say the absence of theoretical physicists is indefensible. Davis wants access to the hardware. Weinstein wants the right minds inserted. The question Davis asks: let us in. The question Weinstein asks is sharper: if you will not let physicists in, what exactly are you protecting? Full conversation covers all of this and much more. Special thanks to Missileman for co-hosting! One of the most important episodes we have ever done live now 👇

🚨 BREAKING: Two of the most technically qualified scientists to ever engage with the UFO mystery sat down together for the first time: Dr. Eric Davis, astrophysics PhD who formally investigated the crash retrieval program through classified government channels and Dr. Eric Weinstein (), Harvard math PhD and founder of physics theory, Geometric Unity. Davis confirms that he personally interviewed 5 direct crash retrieval program employees at two legacy aerospace companies (one being TRW, acquired by Northrop) and that the United States holds between 10 and 40 UFOs in its direct possession. He also describes discussing UFOs with George H.W. Bush directly and Jimmy Carter getting briefed on the subject. Finally, Davis says the program only consists of Aerospace engineers. Weinstein's response: if these craft of non-human origin defy the laws of physics, you need top theoretical physicists on the program. Weinstein says either the people running it are criminally incompetent or there are no craft. Sparks flew.🚨 This is the conversation I have been trying to make happen for years. Eric Davis is one of the most credentialed investigator of the UFO crash retrieval program alive with an eidetic memory. Astrophysics PhD from the University of Arizona, 30 years in the field, security clearances through AAWSAP, formally deputized by the DIA under program manager James Lacatski (who himself claims he has stepped inside a UFO and breached the hull). Eric Weinstein is one of the most technically gifted minds outside the classified world, someone Davis himself identified as one of only three people technical and heterodox enough to engage with this material. I put them in a room and let them go at it. This conversation was nothing short of historic. Bombshell Details: Davis Says Roswell Was Real and He Confirmed It Officially: Davis traces his investigation to 1996 at Robert Bigelow's NIDS. Astronaut Ed Mitchell told him Admiral Thomas Wilson, then J2 on the Joint Chiefs, independently verified the 1947 Corona crash was a real non-human craft. Davis later used his DIA credentials through AAWSAP to reach the programmatic level of the operation. His conviction: 100%. Weinstein says he has talked to too many credible people to dismiss it, but has never seen one piece of incontrovertible proof. Davis Interviewed Program Workers. None Were Physicists: Davis met five people from one legacy aerospace company on the program. A material scientist who spent two decades on it. A TRW source who ran the SCIF at Wright-Patterson with access to intact craft in a secured hangar. Not one of Grusch's 40 firsthand witnesses is a theoretical physicist. Davis confirms none of his contacts were either. Weinstein compares this to performing Beethoven's Fifth with accountants and boxers. Eight Decades of Reverse Engineering. Zero Results: Davis's senior VP source confirmed no functional progress after eight decades. They could see how craft were constructed at the nanoscale. Could not reproduce any of it. Davis asked: where are your physicists? Answer: we never had any. Weinstein calls this a two-line proof. If it defies the laws of physics and you have no physicists, you are either the dumbest operation in history or there is nothing to reverse engineer. Weinstein Tells Davis His Physics Won't Work: Davis has published on warp drives and traversable wormholes within general relativity. Weinstein tells him directly: none of it will work. Davis accepts this. Weinstein says if craft break known physics, the answer is not squeezing exotic scenarios out of Einstein. The answer is Einstein is incomplete. Davis agrees. The debate becomes a collaboration. The Golden Age of Gravity Research Vanished in the 1970s: Weinstein identifies a 1971 Australian intelligence document naming physicists like Arnowitt, Desser, Dyson, and Oppenheimer in what reads like a Manhattan Project for Gravity and exotic propulsion. Two apparent cutouts funded work through Bryce DeWitt at UNC and Lewis Witten at a facility called RIAS inside the Martin Company. Sheldon Glashow and Solomon Lefschitz worked there. Then the trail goes cold. Davis noticed the same disappearance in graduate school. No one had an answer. String Theory as a Weapon Against Frontier Physics: After a Princeton junior designed a working atomic weapon from public sources, theoretical physics became too dangerous to leave in the open. String theory consumed the field. 42 years, zero experimental predictions. The Biden White House told Andreessen and Horowitz directly that entire areas of physics were classified in the nuclear era. Davis says he always thought string theory's dominance and the absence of physicists on the crash retrieval program were connected. Weinstein agrees. Weinstein Finds Gravity Hidden in the Strong Nuclear Force: Lazar's "gravity wave A" claim sounds like garbage. Weinstein treats it as garbled proximity information. He identifies a formal possibility: the theta term from QCD, based on the Pontriagin class, transgresses to a Chern-Simons functional: the closest known Lagrangian to Einstein-Hilbert, which governs gravity. Davis calls it remarkable. Weinstein believes this is the first time the connection has been stated publicly. Renaissance Technologies as the Possible Physics Brain Trust: If a secret physics program exists, track where frontier physicists cluster. Renaissance Technologies hires differential geometers and topologists. Sits next to Brookhaven National Lab. Draws from SUNY Stony Brook, where C.N. Yang was based. Returns resemble state-sponsored performance. Weinstein told Jim Simons before his death that Chern-Simons theory is the closest Lagrangian to Einstein-Hilbert. Simons invited him to Stony Brook for a year, then asked where he would find the funding. He was worth over $20 billion. The Wilson-Davis Notes Are Confirmed Authentic: Davis confirms the typewritten notes are real, legitimate, and 100% accurate. They describe former J2 Admiral Wilson being denied access to a crash retrieval program inside a private aerospace company funded from his own DIA budget. He was told he lacked need-to-know and met with Davis out of frustration. Davis wants blanket immunity to say everything about this meeting but confirms the notes are real. Why This Matters: These two arrive from opposite directions and land on the same problem. Davis has total certainty non-human craft exist in American possession. Weinstein cannot construct a single theory that explains the full landscape of claims and missing evidence. Both say the absence of theoretical physicists is indefensible. Davis wants access to the hardware. Weinstein wants the right minds inserted. The question Davis asks: let us in. The question Weinstein asks is sharper: if you will not let physicists in, what exactly are you protecting? Full conversation covers all of this and much more. Special thanks to Missileman for co-hosting! One of the most important episodes we have ever done live now 👇

Jesse Michels

309,699 次观看 • 6 个月前

One Again, Eric Davis Confirms He Interviewed Admiral Wilson "Jay [Stratton] put Dave [Grusch], and Dave's boss and I together, and I briefed them for 2.5 days [on UAP programs and crash retrievals]." ~Dr. Eric Davis (Here's Eric Davis telling you he interviewed Admiral Wilson without actually saying it. He also referenced General Jack Sheehan, who allegedly touched a craft. Sound isn't great so my transcript isn't perfect.) Davis: "One four-star General (Jack Sheehan, I believe. ~Joe) and one three-star Admiral (Tom Wilson) were able to locate these programs...and they uncovered them. One (Wilson) got a lot of resistance and a hostile reception and was told that he found who he was looking for, they were who they suspected of being. Yes, they were a UFO/UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program." (Those last two sentences are pretty much from the Wilson/Davis notes that Eric penned after his interview with Wilson in 2002) Davis: "The other one (Jack Sheehan) had a lot more political power behind him because of his stature as a four-star General. He was able to get into the program (and allegedly touch a craft) and use his authority and his access., I think they call that a Super User, who has access to all access programs. So he had the capability to look into that whole thing. "I was fortunate to meet Dave Grusch at the behest of Jay Stratton. Dave was an aero-liaison officer to the UAP Task Force. And Dave was working for his boss at the NRO. Jay put Dave, and Dave's boss and I together, and I briefed them for 2.5 days, just a week before COVID struck. And Dave took all of my classified and proprietary information of all the investigations I did at NIDS, AFRO and working for Hal Puthoff at EarthTech, and he took that data and ran with it. And what you now know the aftermath of that was his classified whistleblower complaint to the IG of the IC. So, there is a there there."

One Again, Eric Davis Confirms He Interviewed Admiral Wilson "Jay [Stratton] put Dave [Grusch], and Dave's boss and I together, and I briefed them for 2.5 days [on UAP programs and crash retrievals]." ~Dr. Eric Davis (Here's Eric Davis telling you he interviewed Admiral Wilson without actually saying it. He also referenced General Jack Sheehan, who allegedly touched a craft. Sound isn't great so my transcript isn't perfect.) Davis: "One four-star General (Jack Sheehan, I believe. ~Joe) and one three-star Admiral (Tom Wilson) were able to locate these programs...and they uncovered them. One (Wilson) got a lot of resistance and a hostile reception and was told that he found who he was looking for, they were who they suspected of being. Yes, they were a UFO/UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program." (Those last two sentences are pretty much from the Wilson/Davis notes that Eric penned after his interview with Wilson in 2002) Davis: "The other one (Jack Sheehan) had a lot more political power behind him because of his stature as a four-star General. He was able to get into the program (and allegedly touch a craft) and use his authority and his access., I think they call that a Super User, who has access to all access programs. So he had the capability to look into that whole thing. "I was fortunate to meet Dave Grusch at the behest of Jay Stratton. Dave was an aero-liaison officer to the UAP Task Force. And Dave was working for his boss at the NRO. Jay put Dave, and Dave's boss and I together, and I briefed them for 2.5 days, just a week before COVID struck. And Dave took all of my classified and proprietary information of all the investigations I did at NIDS, AFRO and working for Hal Puthoff at EarthTech, and he took that data and ran with it. And what you now know the aftermath of that was his classified whistleblower complaint to the IG of the IC. So, there is a there there."

Joe Murgia

48,388 次观看 • 1 年前

🔥🛸 "The startling thing is, is he's [the late Jim Ryder at Lockheed] revealing that he was one of the engineers that worked on the crash retrieval program with four other individuals." ~Eric Davis 🛸🔥 During AAWSAP, a senior VP at Lockheed (this is the late Jim Ryder) briefed Hal Puthoff, Colm Kelleher and Robert Bigelow, in a SCIF, about the crash retrieval program and that he (Ryder) had worked on for 20 years with four other people. In later interactions, he told Davis the same thing. They were all briefed up to the TS-SCI level but when they had more detailed questions, Ryder couldn't answer them because, "that's now rising up to the level of what's called the Waived Unacknowledged Special Access Program, which is the security cover that was provided for ALL of the crash retrieval programs that were going on since...probably that Italian crash of 1933 that had gotten recovered by the U.S. Army during its invasion of Italy in 1944, and transferred back to Wright Army Airfield that year. "This was kind of startling because now it's like, okay we're actually talking to somebody (Ryder) who's at a senior executive level in a major aerospace defense corporation that's pretty huge, and it's actually the largest in the world. And, of course, this is all in classified settings, so we know this is all legitimate. The only problem is we couldn't get further because we needed to get Waived Unacknowledged SAP clearances, and, unfortunately, I don't know what was going on in the background with that. I do know that Harry Reid and Jim Lacatksi attempted to get that kind of security clearances for all of us and Harry Reid failed because the Deputy Secretary of Defense during that period...William Lynn in the Obama administration. So [Lynn] turned down Harry Reid's request."

🔥🛸 "The startling thing is, is he's [the late Jim Ryder at Lockheed] revealing that he was one of the engineers that worked on the crash retrieval program with four other individuals." ~Eric Davis 🛸🔥 During AAWSAP, a senior VP at Lockheed (this is the late Jim Ryder) briefed Hal Puthoff, Colm Kelleher and Robert Bigelow, in a SCIF, about the crash retrieval program and that he (Ryder) had worked on for 20 years with four other people. In later interactions, he told Davis the same thing. They were all briefed up to the TS-SCI level but when they had more detailed questions, Ryder couldn't answer them because, "that's now rising up to the level of what's called the Waived Unacknowledged Special Access Program, which is the security cover that was provided for ALL of the crash retrieval programs that were going on since...probably that Italian crash of 1933 that had gotten recovered by the U.S. Army during its invasion of Italy in 1944, and transferred back to Wright Army Airfield that year. "This was kind of startling because now it's like, okay we're actually talking to somebody (Ryder) who's at a senior executive level in a major aerospace defense corporation that's pretty huge, and it's actually the largest in the world. And, of course, this is all in classified settings, so we know this is all legitimate. The only problem is we couldn't get further because we needed to get Waived Unacknowledged SAP clearances, and, unfortunately, I don't know what was going on in the background with that. I do know that Harry Reid and Jim Lacatksi attempted to get that kind of security clearances for all of us and Harry Reid failed because the Deputy Secretary of Defense during that period...William Lynn in the Obama administration. So [Lynn] turned down Harry Reid's request."

Joe Murgia

27,183 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨Eric Davis just put one of the most explosive claims back on the record. Speaking to Peter Skafish on the Sol Foundation, physicist Eric Davis reaffirmed that the U.S. government has operated crash retrieval and reverse engineering programs and that at least one former U.S. president was directly exposed to evidence tied to them. According to Davis, he held multiple phone conversations in 2003-2004 with George H. W. Bush after Bush's retirement. Those calls, Davis says, stemmed from introductions made through senior intelligence circles associated with AFIO and former Pentagon and intelligence officials. During those conversations, Bush allegedly confirmed that while being read in as CIA Director in the Ford administration, a DoD liaison officer mistakenly assumed Bush already had access to UAP related programs and began briefing him on them. That briefing, Davis claims, included details of a 1964 landing at Holloman Air Force Base, where a non human craft allegedly landed, a humanoid entity exited, and met with senior U.S. Air Force officers and CIA personnel. The encounter was reportedly filmed by a military helicopter crew responding to air traffic control orders. Bush, according to Davis, requested access to the files and footage and was denied. He was told the program sat outside his clearance unless a specific presidential authority was triggered. If this is accurate, this places direct U.S. executive leadership face to face with evidence of non human intelligence, while simultaneously exposing the existence of programs operating beyond normal presidential oversight. Source:

🚨Eric Davis just put one of the most explosive claims back on the record. Speaking to Peter Skafish on the Sol Foundation, physicist Eric Davis reaffirmed that the U.S. government has operated crash retrieval and reverse engineering programs and that at least one former U.S. president was directly exposed to evidence tied to them. According to Davis, he held multiple phone conversations in 2003-2004 with George H. W. Bush after Bush's retirement. Those calls, Davis says, stemmed from introductions made through senior intelligence circles associated with AFIO and former Pentagon and intelligence officials. During those conversations, Bush allegedly confirmed that while being read in as CIA Director in the Ford administration, a DoD liaison officer mistakenly assumed Bush already had access to UAP related programs and began briefing him on them. That briefing, Davis claims, included details of a 1964 landing at Holloman Air Force Base, where a non human craft allegedly landed, a humanoid entity exited, and met with senior U.S. Air Force officers and CIA personnel. The encounter was reportedly filmed by a military helicopter crew responding to air traffic control orders. Bush, according to Davis, requested access to the files and footage and was denied. He was told the program sat outside his clearance unless a specific presidential authority was triggered. If this is accurate, this places direct U.S. executive leadership face to face with evidence of non human intelligence, while simultaneously exposing the existence of programs operating beyond normal presidential oversight. Source:

Skywatch Signal

40,331 次观看 • 7 个月前

Hal Puthoff tells Eric Burlison that Jay Stratton is who he needs to talk to about the legacy UFO program because he found it during AAWSAP but never got access Hal -“the AAWSAP program was started by Senator Harry Reid Reid and a couple of other senators at the time— Kind of looked from the outside into the legacy program, but then when you got— Well, to look outside in into the phenomena. So at the beginning, I don't think they recognized that there was a legacy program. It was only that in the process of carrying out the requirements of the AAWSAP program, began to realize, oh my God, there's more behind the scenes that we didn't even know about when we set up this program. And that's why I would suggest talking to Jay Stratton, part of the UAP Task Force because he was the one that began to collect data from here, there, and everywhere, and then identify gatekeepers and find out that there was a legacy program. And we never got access. I mean, the gatekeepers of the legacy program, even though we were, you know, even going for Kona Blue, we're supposed to be an SAP program, we still couldn't get access to the legacy programs. The security personnel involved in the Kona Blue thing found the gatekeepers, and the gatekeepers said, "We're not going to talk to you until you have an SAP." But we didn't get the SAP, so that never went anywhere. So those are really two completely separate enterprises.”

Hal Puthoff tells Eric Burlison that Jay Stratton is who he needs to talk to about the legacy UFO program because he found it during AAWSAP but never got access Hal -“the AAWSAP program was started by Senator Harry Reid Reid and a couple of other senators at the time— Kind of looked from the outside into the legacy program, but then when you got— Well, to look outside in into the phenomena. So at the beginning, I don't think they recognized that there was a legacy program. It was only that in the process of carrying out the requirements of the AAWSAP program, began to realize, oh my God, there's more behind the scenes that we didn't even know about when we set up this program. And that's why I would suggest talking to Jay Stratton, part of the UAP Task Force because he was the one that began to collect data from here, there, and everywhere, and then identify gatekeepers and find out that there was a legacy program. And we never got access. I mean, the gatekeepers of the legacy program, even though we were, you know, even going for Kona Blue, we're supposed to be an SAP program, we still couldn't get access to the legacy programs. The security personnel involved in the Kona Blue thing found the gatekeepers, and the gatekeepers said, "We're not going to talk to you until you have an SAP." But we didn't get the SAP, so that never went anywhere. So those are really two completely separate enterprises.”

neandrewthal

30,968 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨Why UAP Secrecy Lasts Decades: Eric Davis Explains the Mechanism What Eric W. Davis describes is a system that works exactly as intended. Most people with eligibility and need to know access just don't talk, and not because they're constantly threatened, but because silence becomes routine. Careers end, lives move on, and the information simply never reenters public space again. In many cases, the only time anything emerges is late in life, sometimes via affidavits meant to be recorded after death. In the case of the Corona crash, Davis points to a specific and verifiable inflection point during the Clinton administration. When John Podesta was tasked with probing UAP related secrecy, the Secretary of the Air Force issued a formal order permanently lifting NDAs for 509th Bombardment Group personnel from 1947. Criminal penalties and financial punishment were removed. Only after that did people begin to speak openly. Davis is also careful to correct the record where it's been exaggerated. There was one craft at Corona, not two. That detail doesn't weaken the case at all, in fact it strengthens it. What really underpins his confidence is provenance. He isn't relying on anonymous tips or secondhand retellings. He references direct interactions with figures like Edgar Mitchell, and extended, recorded interviews with senior military officers who had firsthand access to command staff involved in recovery and transfer. Seven hours of transcribed testimony isn't just trust me bro. There's also a timing detail that can easily be overlooked. Much of this unfolded before the modern Air Force even existed, before the National Security Act of 1947 formalized today's security architecture. Procedures were improvised and oversight was minimal. That early window made it far easier for material and documentation to disappear into permanent compartmentalization. You don't have to accept every conclusion Davis draws to understand the point he's making. Dismissing this outright requires ignoring how secrecy actually functions, how NDAs shape behavior, and how information only surfaces once those constraints are deliberately removed. Source:

🚨Why UAP Secrecy Lasts Decades: Eric Davis Explains the Mechanism What Eric W. Davis describes is a system that works exactly as intended. Most people with eligibility and need to know access just don't talk, and not because they're constantly threatened, but because silence becomes routine. Careers end, lives move on, and the information simply never reenters public space again. In many cases, the only time anything emerges is late in life, sometimes via affidavits meant to be recorded after death. In the case of the Corona crash, Davis points to a specific and verifiable inflection point during the Clinton administration. When John Podesta was tasked with probing UAP related secrecy, the Secretary of the Air Force issued a formal order permanently lifting NDAs for 509th Bombardment Group personnel from 1947. Criminal penalties and financial punishment were removed. Only after that did people begin to speak openly. Davis is also careful to correct the record where it's been exaggerated. There was one craft at Corona, not two. That detail doesn't weaken the case at all, in fact it strengthens it. What really underpins his confidence is provenance. He isn't relying on anonymous tips or secondhand retellings. He references direct interactions with figures like Edgar Mitchell, and extended, recorded interviews with senior military officers who had firsthand access to command staff involved in recovery and transfer. Seven hours of transcribed testimony isn't just trust me bro. There's also a timing detail that can easily be overlooked. Much of this unfolded before the modern Air Force even existed, before the National Security Act of 1947 formalized today's security architecture. Procedures were improvised and oversight was minimal. That early window made it far easier for material and documentation to disappear into permanent compartmentalization. You don't have to accept every conclusion Davis draws to understand the point he's making. Dismissing this outright requires ignoring how secrecy actually functions, how NDAs shape behavior, and how information only surfaces once those constraints are deliberately removed. Source:

Skywatch Signal

10,345 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: Eric Davis says Roswell a was 100% REAL UFO Crash! 🛸👽 "I used my security clearances, need-to-know access, and a letter deputizing me as a DIA rep under Jim Lacatski to get into the UFO crash retrieval program," Davis reveals. He names key players but omits some after warnings: "If he kept speaking about a couple of individuals, they would have no problem in killing him." And the shocker: "The craft that had been recovered are not of this Earth." Plus, "We have crash retrievals... our tech wasn't advanced enough to make heads or tails of what they had." Eric Davis was speaking on the Jesse Michels Podcast American Alchemy What do you think—is this the disclosure we've been waiting for? Have you encountered anything unexplained? Share below! #UFO #UAP

🚨 BREAKING: Eric Davis says Roswell a was 100% REAL UFO Crash! 🛸👽 "I used my security clearances, need-to-know access, and a letter deputizing me as a DIA rep under Jim Lacatski to get into the UFO crash retrieval program," Davis reveals. He names key players but omits some after warnings: "If he kept speaking about a couple of individuals, they would have no problem in killing him." And the shocker: "The craft that had been recovered are not of this Earth." Plus, "We have crash retrievals... our tech wasn't advanced enough to make heads or tails of what they had." Eric Davis was speaking on the Jesse Michels Podcast American Alchemy What do you think—is this the disclosure we've been waiting for? Have you encountered anything unexplained? Share below! #UFO #UAP

Interstellar

15,062 次观看 • 6 个月前

A few days ago, 161 classified UAP files were released to the public that include more than 400 incidents of previously unseen videos showing ‘unclassified objects’ around the world and the truth is, I still don’t know what to believe… Which is exactly why I wanted to have today’s discussion. Dan Farah and Dr Harold Puthoff join me on The Diary Of A CEO to understand why this subject has suddenly become impossible to ignore. Dan has spent years interviewing senior military officials, intelligence figures and government insiders for his documentary The Age of Disclosure. Harold has spent decades working with organisations including the NSA, CIA and Department of Defense studying advanced aerospace science and physics. One of the things I’ve always struggled with conspiracies like this is that I don’t know why that information would necessarily fall into the hands of government officials. If there was something out there, we would have seen a very clear image of this thing by now. What I’m trying to do is interrogate this from all angles. Could it have been something else??

A few days ago, 161 classified UAP files were released to the public that include more than 400 incidents of previously unseen videos showing ‘unclassified objects’ around the world and the truth is, I still don’t know what to believe… Which is exactly why I wanted to have today’s discussion. Dan Farah and Dr Harold Puthoff join me on The Diary Of A CEO to understand why this subject has suddenly become impossible to ignore. Dan has spent years interviewing senior military officials, intelligence figures and government insiders for his documentary The Age of Disclosure. Harold has spent decades working with organisations including the NSA, CIA and Department of Defense studying advanced aerospace science and physics. One of the things I’ve always struggled with conspiracies like this is that I don’t know why that information would necessarily fall into the hands of government officials. If there was something out there, we would have seen a very clear image of this thing by now. What I’m trying to do is interrogate this from all angles. Could it have been something else??

Steven Bartlett

42,207 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 Ross Coulthart BOMBSHELL: "Lue Elizondo was part of the Legacy UFO Crash Retrieval Program" 👽🛸🇺🇸 Lue Elizondo had a role within the legacy UFO crash retrieval program and led James Clapper effort to conceal it and control the UAP Disclosure narrative. He states that Lue needs to be more forthcoming about his past roles. There are people that bitterly resent that Lue be appointed to a position of power in UAP transparency because they think that he was part of a previous agenda that was to try to control the narrative to restrict what the public is entitled to know about UAP Disclosure. Coulthart believes a lot of this was an intention by James Clapper to try and impose a narrative on the public domain using Lue as a highly urbane articulate and likable frontman to try to restrict what the public was told about crash retrievals. Speaking directly to Elizondo he says he has spoken to people in the legacy program who knew Lue. Lue I know a lot of people and they know you. I know you cannot speak about the role that you have held within the legacy program but you did. We have got to stop this nonsense because it is becoming distractive. There are factions and bitternesses beginning to develop within the UAP world and it is in danger of blowing the whole thing apart. The remarks point to real tensions inside the disclosure community that could slow progress. How can those seeking truth come together to focus on facts rather than division?

🚨 Ross Coulthart BOMBSHELL: "Lue Elizondo was part of the Legacy UFO Crash Retrieval Program" 👽🛸🇺🇸 Lue Elizondo had a role within the legacy UFO crash retrieval program and led James Clapper effort to conceal it and control the UAP Disclosure narrative. He states that Lue needs to be more forthcoming about his past roles. There are people that bitterly resent that Lue be appointed to a position of power in UAP transparency because they think that he was part of a previous agenda that was to try to control the narrative to restrict what the public is entitled to know about UAP Disclosure. Coulthart believes a lot of this was an intention by James Clapper to try and impose a narrative on the public domain using Lue as a highly urbane articulate and likable frontman to try to restrict what the public was told about crash retrievals. Speaking directly to Elizondo he says he has spoken to people in the legacy program who knew Lue. Lue I know a lot of people and they know you. I know you cannot speak about the role that you have held within the legacy program but you did. We have got to stop this nonsense because it is becoming distractive. There are factions and bitternesses beginning to develop within the UAP world and it is in danger of blowing the whole thing apart. The remarks point to real tensions inside the disclosure community that could slow progress. How can those seeking truth come together to focus on facts rather than division?

Interstellar

46,895 次观看 • 3 个月前

🛸 "He accidentally activated [the craft] and it levitated. And he couldn't figure out how to turn it off." ~Davis 🛸 (This is what Davis says he was told by Mary Elizabeth Elliot. Bring her in and have her tell the WORLD her story. You saw this craft levitating with your own eyes? Were you inside of it? How do you think it operated? Telepathy/psi?) Dr. Eric Davis: "I just know that one aerospace company (TRW) that ran their program at Wright Patterson, circa the 1990s, from not long after the birth of this company to the end of the 80s...they had an intact craft. They didn't know how to activate it. They could get inside, they didn't know how to activate it. "But one scientist, one of their engineers or scientists working on it...so I think he was inside the craft. So it's not manual, human-style control systems, it's a completely different type of control system. Definitely not anthropocentric, anthropomorphic, or anything. "He was, desperately, touching things to try to get something to work, and he accidentally activated it and it levitated. And he couldn't figure out how to turn it off (laughs). So, my source at TRW for that (Mary Elizabeth Elliot) said that that craft was just left levitating in the hangar - in a secured, classified hangar - and that's how they had to leave it because nobody could figure out how to reverse the controls to shut it down (laughs)." (Note: Davis has never said her name but if you've followed the Wilson/Davis-notes story, you know who he's talking about. And if you think he's full of it, fine. Bring her in and let's hear it from her mouth and see if anybody else who worked in that alleged UFO program (the scientist?) is willing to come forward, too. If they're Trump voters/supporters, that might help.) ~~~More on MEE from the Davis interview with The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford ~~~ (OmniTalk Radio and I obsessed over MEE for years so it's nice to see some details finally coming out. I REALLY hope we get to hear from her so we can judge her credibility. She has the potential to blow this whole thing wide open. So did Jim Ryder, the now-deceased vice president of Lockheed who, according to Davis, said he worked on the C/R program right out of graduate school, along with a friend of his (Ryder's). His loss was a horrible set-back but that can be overcome if we get to hear from MEE and others who say they worked in/on the program.) ~ Davis to Matt: "I was given leaked classified information by someone (This is Mary Elizabeth Elliot) who was an executive administrative assistant and field security officer for one of the Legacy aerospace companies (TRW ~Joe) that no longer exists. It got absorbed by one of the other Legacy aerospace companies after 2000 or about that period of time." (TRW was acquired by Northrop Grumman in December of 2002.) Davis: "And that individual (MEE) revealed that Wright Patterson Air Force Base, where they had a facility at - her company that employed her - and they had intact craft there that they were trying to reverse engineer." "And so, that I knew about, that was illegal information she shouldn't have told me, but I didn't have security clearances with the need-to-know to get that. That was leaked, and that was kept very quiet until the leak of the Wilson notes, in which elements of her story, of that woman (MEE) - that's a woman - that individual's story were included as context to provide context to the Wilson notes. It was just kind of glommed on to the Wilson transcript to provide context to the crash retrieval's absurd security measures to keep it hidden." I included the MEE parts of the Wilson notes, here:

🛸 "He accidentally activated [the craft] and it levitated. And he couldn't figure out how to turn it off." ~Davis 🛸 (This is what Davis says he was told by Mary Elizabeth Elliot. Bring her in and have her tell the WORLD her story. You saw this craft levitating with your own eyes? Were you inside of it? How do you think it operated? Telepathy/psi?) Dr. Eric Davis: "I just know that one aerospace company (TRW) that ran their program at Wright Patterson, circa the 1990s, from not long after the birth of this company to the end of the 80s...they had an intact craft. They didn't know how to activate it. They could get inside, they didn't know how to activate it. "But one scientist, one of their engineers or scientists working on it...so I think he was inside the craft. So it's not manual, human-style control systems, it's a completely different type of control system. Definitely not anthropocentric, anthropomorphic, or anything. "He was, desperately, touching things to try to get something to work, and he accidentally activated it and it levitated. And he couldn't figure out how to turn it off (laughs). So, my source at TRW for that (Mary Elizabeth Elliot) said that that craft was just left levitating in the hangar - in a secured, classified hangar - and that's how they had to leave it because nobody could figure out how to reverse the controls to shut it down (laughs)." (Note: Davis has never said her name but if you've followed the Wilson/Davis-notes story, you know who he's talking about. And if you think he's full of it, fine. Bring her in and let's hear it from her mouth and see if anybody else who worked in that alleged UFO program (the scientist?) is willing to come forward, too. If they're Trump voters/supporters, that might help.) ~More on MEE from the Davis interview with The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford ~ (OmniTalk Radio and I obsessed over MEE for years so it's nice to see some details finally coming out. I REALLY hope we get to hear from her so we can judge her credibility. She has the potential to blow this whole thing wide open. So did Jim Ryder, the now-deceased vice president of Lockheed who, according to Davis, said he worked on the C/R program right out of graduate school, along with a friend of his (Ryder's). His loss was a horrible set-back but that can be overcome if we get to hear from MEE and others who say they worked in/on the program.) ~ Davis to Matt: "I was given leaked classified information by someone (This is Mary Elizabeth Elliot) who was an executive administrative assistant and field security officer for one of the Legacy aerospace companies (TRW ~Joe) that no longer exists. It got absorbed by one of the other Legacy aerospace companies after 2000 or about that period of time." (TRW was acquired by Northrop Grumman in December of 2002.) Davis: "And that individual (MEE) revealed that Wright Patterson Air Force Base, where they had a facility at - her company that employed her - and they had intact craft there that they were trying to reverse engineer." "And so, that I knew about, that was illegal information she shouldn't have told me, but I didn't have security clearances with the need-to-know to get that. That was leaked, and that was kept very quiet until the leak of the Wilson notes, in which elements of her story, of that woman (MEE) - that's a woman - that individual's story were included as context to provide context to the Wilson notes. It was just kind of glommed on to the Wilson transcript to provide context to the crash retrieval's absurd security measures to keep it hidden." I included the MEE parts of the Wilson notes, here:

Joe Murgia

47,957 次观看 • 2 个月前

▲ Davis: Lacatski Never Told Us We Had Made Progress with Reverse Engineering! ▲ (This may be kind of a big deal. I've posted several times about Lacatski's claim that we've reverse engineered craft, but not to their full extent. Say what? I've always been surprised that Lacatski said that. If it's true, it's HUGE. Today, Davis addressed it, and his answer seems to put to bed the claim that he's (Davis) been trying to hide any progress we may have made on that front, as others have suggested. Hell, I thought he might be downplaying any progress we've made on that because these guys (Eric, Lue, Stratton, etc.) don't want our adversaries to know certain things, and I thought that was one of those things. Yes, Davis has always downplayed (and pretty much rejected) the claim that we've made progress on the reverse-engineering front, but it now appears he was saying that only because that's what he had learned through his investigations and research and not because he was trying to protect that specific secret.) Dr. Eric Davis: "So the military was seeing triangles, and so, we were...so the AAASAP was trying to figure out the physics of how to do that type of propulsion. And [Lacatksi] was asked by Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell, "Do you think it's already been achieved by the U.S. government, or it hasn't, and that's why AAASAP had a lot of value?' And Jim Lacatski replied, 'It hasn't been achieved to its full extent (laughs).'" (As you've seen me ask more than a few times: If not to the full extent, how much? 50% 75? If we've really had success, that's an important question. Glad to see Davis and I are on the same page with that. And was Lacatski JUST referring to triangular craft, or all craft in our possession?) Davis: "So how much did they achieve it? 25% 50% 75% I don't know because he never told us! So, Hal Puthoff and I have talked about these things, and we're looking at each other like, 'Huh?' So, uhh...no, this isn't disinformation." (I've wondered on here if it was a disinformation attempt by Lacatski to trick our adversaries into thinking we may have made more progress than we actually have. But Davis appears to think otherwise.) Davis: "This is the DOPSR telling Jim what he can say publicly in his books versus what he can't say in his books. And they cleared him to say what he said, and obviously they cleared him to say what he said to Corbell and George Knapp." (Either that, or he slipped up during the interview with "Weaponized." But Lacatski seems to measure his words and he doesn't appear to be a guy who slips up like that. He's VERY hesitant to share too much because he's said that our adversaries are listening to every word he says or writes.) Davis: "I haven't read his second and third books yet, so I don't know if that thing about the triangles is even in there. I haven't gone all the way through the first book yet, either. So, it's real. Lacatski would have the eligibility for access." ~~~ The original exchange between Corbell and Lacatski... Jeremy Corbell: "We hear about all these people on military bases seeing triangles, and you're doing this study, AAWSAP to try to figure out the physics of how to do that. Do you think it's already been achieved by the U.S. government, or it hasn't, and that's why AAWSAP had a lot of value?" Lacatski: "It hasn't been achieved to its full extent."

▲ Davis: Lacatski Never Told Us We Had Made Progress with Reverse Engineering! ▲ (This may be kind of a big deal. I've posted several times about Lacatski's claim that we've reverse engineered craft, but not to their full extent. Say what? I've always been surprised that Lacatski said that. If it's true, it's HUGE. Today, Davis addressed it, and his answer seems to put to bed the claim that he's (Davis) been trying to hide any progress we may have made on that front, as others have suggested. Hell, I thought he might be downplaying any progress we've made on that because these guys (Eric, Lue, Stratton, etc.) don't want our adversaries to know certain things, and I thought that was one of those things. Yes, Davis has always downplayed (and pretty much rejected) the claim that we've made progress on the reverse-engineering front, but it now appears he was saying that only because that's what he had learned through his investigations and research and not because he was trying to protect that specific secret.) Dr. Eric Davis: "So the military was seeing triangles, and so, we were...so the AAASAP was trying to figure out the physics of how to do that type of propulsion. And [Lacatksi] was asked by Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell, "Do you think it's already been achieved by the U.S. government, or it hasn't, and that's why AAASAP had a lot of value?' And Jim Lacatski replied, 'It hasn't been achieved to its full extent (laughs).'" (As you've seen me ask more than a few times: If not to the full extent, how much? 50% 75? If we've really had success, that's an important question. Glad to see Davis and I are on the same page with that. And was Lacatski JUST referring to triangular craft, or all craft in our possession?) Davis: "So how much did they achieve it? 25% 50% 75% I don't know because he never told us! So, Hal Puthoff and I have talked about these things, and we're looking at each other like, 'Huh?' So, uhh...no, this isn't disinformation." (I've wondered on here if it was a disinformation attempt by Lacatski to trick our adversaries into thinking we may have made more progress than we actually have. But Davis appears to think otherwise.) Davis: "This is the DOPSR telling Jim what he can say publicly in his books versus what he can't say in his books. And they cleared him to say what he said, and obviously they cleared him to say what he said to Corbell and George Knapp." (Either that, or he slipped up during the interview with "Weaponized." But Lacatski seems to measure his words and he doesn't appear to be a guy who slips up like that. He's VERY hesitant to share too much because he's said that our adversaries are listening to every word he says or writes.) Davis: "I haven't read his second and third books yet, so I don't know if that thing about the triangles is even in there. I haven't gone all the way through the first book yet, either. So, it's real. Lacatski would have the eligibility for access." ~~~ The original exchange between Corbell and Lacatski... Jeremy Corbell: "We hear about all these people on military bases seeing triangles, and you're doing this study, AAWSAP to try to figure out the physics of how to do that. Do you think it's already been achieved by the U.S. government, or it hasn't, and that's why AAWSAP had a lot of value?" Lacatski: "It hasn't been achieved to its full extent."

Joe Murgia

13,125 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨David Grusch vs. James Clapper: The Disclosure Line Just Broke Why Grusch's Megyn Kelly Interview May Be the Most Explosive Admission in Modern UAP History Grusch crossed a line that hadn't been crossed before. Ross Coulthart reacted to David Grusch's interview with Megyn Kelly, where Grusch, a former intelligence officer directly named a former Director of National Intelligence as someone who managed a UAP crash retrieval program. As Ross points out, in "The Age of Disclosure", James Clapper appeared to acknowledge awareness of a program that tracked UAPs. At the time, that felt significant but vague. What Grusch has now done is remove the ambiguity. According to him, Clapper wasn't just aware of crash retrievals, he actually managed them. While serving as DNI, he placed people into critical roles to control how the issue was handled, both publicly and through channels that were not public at all. If Clapper managed a crash retrieval program, then the idea that senior intelligence figures "didn’t really know" falls apart. Silence all of s sudden looks less like uncertainty and more like policy. It also forces a harder question about just how many other officials who now speak publicly about UAPs once had operational roles inside the same legacy program? Grusch didn't stop with Clapper. He also referenced Stephanie O'Sullivan and others who were present in rooms where this issue was discussed and managed. This reveals a structured program, overseen, and staffed at the highest levels. Personally I think at this point, the debate has changed. We are no longer arguing about whether programs existed or parsing blurry footage. We're dealing with named individuals and specific roles. That's a different phase of disclosure entirely. For the first time ever, accountability has been placed squarely in view. This wasn't a slip of the tongue or careless phrasing by Grusch. It was deliberate, measured, and put on the public record for a reason. Now its up to us to put the pressure on. Source:

🚨David Grusch vs. James Clapper: The Disclosure Line Just Broke Why Grusch's Megyn Kelly Interview May Be the Most Explosive Admission in Modern UAP History Grusch crossed a line that hadn't been crossed before. Ross Coulthart reacted to David Grusch's interview with Megyn Kelly, where Grusch, a former intelligence officer directly named a former Director of National Intelligence as someone who managed a UAP crash retrieval program. As Ross points out, in "The Age of Disclosure", James Clapper appeared to acknowledge awareness of a program that tracked UAPs. At the time, that felt significant but vague. What Grusch has now done is remove the ambiguity. According to him, Clapper wasn't just aware of crash retrievals, he actually managed them. While serving as DNI, he placed people into critical roles to control how the issue was handled, both publicly and through channels that were not public at all. If Clapper managed a crash retrieval program, then the idea that senior intelligence figures "didn’t really know" falls apart. Silence all of s sudden looks less like uncertainty and more like policy. It also forces a harder question about just how many other officials who now speak publicly about UAPs once had operational roles inside the same legacy program? Grusch didn't stop with Clapper. He also referenced Stephanie O'Sullivan and others who were present in rooms where this issue was discussed and managed. This reveals a structured program, overseen, and staffed at the highest levels. Personally I think at this point, the debate has changed. We are no longer arguing about whether programs existed or parsing blurry footage. We're dealing with named individuals and specific roles. That's a different phase of disclosure entirely. For the first time ever, accountability has been placed squarely in view. This wasn't a slip of the tongue or careless phrasing by Grusch. It was deliberate, measured, and put on the public record for a reason. Now its up to us to put the pressure on. Source:

Skywatch Signal

49,653 次观看 • 8 个月前

"There was some pretty intense stuff about lifeforms, what they were doing." ~TB 💥 If Trump Waives Eric Davis' NDAs, Is This Some of What We Can Expect to Hear? 💥 (I may not be first with these clips but I try to include info. that you won't get anywhere else.) If that information about lifeforms, and what they were doing, was accurate, it's the type of information the world deserves to know. Was it Dr. Eric Davis who briefed him/them on that? I have a sneaking suspicion that it was, and I have NOT asked Davis about this.) "All these rumors that you hear...just the wild, crazy stuff, some of that stuff now I'm being briefed on and people are telling me...actually has occurred." ~TB ~ Sean Hannity 🇺🇸: "If I knew what you knew, I would not be able to sleep at night." Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office (TB): "Yeah, I was briefed in a situation, and they got into some pretty intense stuff." Hannity: "Can I ask who briefed you?" Burchett: "You can ask but I can't tell." (Again: My Guess: Dr. Eric Davis. I could be wrong, but it makes a lot of sense to me. Here's why... This is a message from Davis to me, from January... Why Won't Davis Share What He Know with Congress? Davis: "I already shared my information in a Pentagon SCIF with the SASC staff in Oct. 2019 and in a controlled access conference room in a Senate office building with the SSCI staff in Oct. 2019 and at a defense company’s controlled access room in June 2021. "Then I shared it with Rep. Anna Paulina Luna's committee in a House of Representatives office building SCIF last May. (Burchett is part of that committee, and that's one reason why I feel like Davis is the one Burchett is referring to when he says someone briefed him on some intense stuff.) Davis: "So the 'Why won’t he?' has already been answered." Murgia: "So what changes if a President waives your NDAs?" Davis: "If the POTUS were to waive my NDAs, I could share everything I know with the public." (PUBLIC!) ~~~ Hannity: "Have you ever told Donald Trump about all the obstacles they're throwing in your face?" Burchett: "No, I haven't. As a matter of fact, I had a discussion with somebody last week. They said, you need to have lunch with [Trump]. It's very difficult to get, you know, he's, right now, of course, things going on all over the world." Hannity: "But you're also saying, on the other hand, on a need-to-know basis. And that means the President's not on a need-to-know basis? Our duly-elected president, information is being withheld from him?" Burchett: "I believe so. I was told that, even. Yeah, in the SCIF, this one time, where they asked me, where you're quoting, I mean, there was some pretty intense stuff about lifeforms, what they were doing. And different..." Hannity: "Lifeforms alive here? Lifeforms dead here?" Burchett: "Possibly. Both. Both." Hennity: "And vehicles that have been recovered here?" Burchett: "Yeah, and some that have possibly come here, and not in a crash-type setting (laughs). We had an individual that gave..." (Again, this feels like Davis was the guy briefing them. He has spoken about crashed AND landed craft, including the alleged Holloman AFB landing-and-meeting event.) Burchett: "And this was interesting about the whole thing was because, there's all the folks in there, and there's different groups of people, and Rep. Eric Burlison's a dear friend of mine. Because in the beginning, he was a big skeptic (According to Burlison, he still IS a skeptic. ~Joe), you know? And I asked him to join us in some of this stuff because I needed somebody that just wasn't like me, that just had been..." Hannity: "Skepticism's healthy." Burlison: "It's very healthy. I mean, you know...but a lot of people that were skeptics. But we were in this one meeting in a secure environment, and a member came in who is not really friendly to the cause. And really was a disrupter and started asking questions. And the person who was briefing us named names, dates, times, places, events, people." (That sounds exactly like the meticulous, and detail-orientated, Dr. Eric Davis. 😎 ) Burchett: "Because I'd asked a question about Jimmy Carter. There was talk, I just threw it out there, that Carter... I didn't like his politics, but I don't question his faith." (Sad that Burchett even feels the need to mention Carter's politics.) Burchett: "And they said that [Carter] was briefed at one time and became physically upset with the information that he was given." Hannity: "Of course he did." (This seemed like snide remark from Hannity, as in, Carter wasn't a real man and he couldn't handle information like that without getting upset. Cheap shot, but that's Hannity.) Burchett: "Yeah, but he had actually seen a UFO, it's a documented thing. And this person that was briefing us gave the date of that meeting and he gave the receipts. He said, 'You can go to the Carter library,' and he gave the date. and said... And there was, I think four people in the meeting (with Carter), and they listed three of them, and one of them, they weren't sure who it was. So it was probably, you know, CIA or something. And it ended up upsetting [Carter] so much that they pretty much had to clear his calendar for a while. But what is that?" (Again, that sounds like a Davis briefing.) Burchett: "And the thing is, everything that I've...all these rumors that you hear in the movies, in the books and the magazines that I read growing up, just the wild, crazy stuff, some of that stuff now I'm being briefed on and people are telling me that this is actually has occurred. And that, to me, is, I wonder, is this stuff being planted? Is it being pushed out, so that we gradually get a hold of it?" (Hopefully, we get to hear what Burchett and the others heard so we can judge the veracity of it and see if we can somehow confirm any of it.)

"There was some pretty intense stuff about lifeforms, what they were doing." ~TB 💥 If Trump Waives Eric Davis' NDAs, Is This Some of What We Can Expect to Hear? 💥 (I may not be first with these clips but I try to include info. that you won't get anywhere else.) If that information about lifeforms, and what they were doing, was accurate, it's the type of information the world deserves to know. Was it Dr. Eric Davis who briefed him/them on that? I have a sneaking suspicion that it was, and I have NOT asked Davis about this.) "All these rumors that you hear...just the wild, crazy stuff, some of that stuff now I'm being briefed on and people are telling me...actually has occurred." ~TB ~ Sean Hannity 🇺🇸: "If I knew what you knew, I would not be able to sleep at night." Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office (TB): "Yeah, I was briefed in a situation, and they got into some pretty intense stuff." Hannity: "Can I ask who briefed you?" Burchett: "You can ask but I can't tell." (Again: My Guess: Dr. Eric Davis. I could be wrong, but it makes a lot of sense to me. Here's why... This is a message from Davis to me, from January... Why Won't Davis Share What He Know with Congress? Davis: "I already shared my information in a Pentagon SCIF with the SASC staff in Oct. 2019 and in a controlled access conference room in a Senate office building with the SSCI staff in Oct. 2019 and at a defense company’s controlled access room in June 2021. "Then I shared it with Rep. Anna Paulina Luna's committee in a House of Representatives office building SCIF last May. (Burchett is part of that committee, and that's one reason why I feel like Davis is the one Burchett is referring to when he says someone briefed him on some intense stuff.) Davis: "So the 'Why won’t he?' has already been answered." Murgia: "So what changes if a President waives your NDAs?" Davis: "If the POTUS were to waive my NDAs, I could share everything I know with the public." (PUBLIC!) ~~~ Hannity: "Have you ever told Donald Trump about all the obstacles they're throwing in your face?" Burchett: "No, I haven't. As a matter of fact, I had a discussion with somebody last week. They said, you need to have lunch with [Trump]. It's very difficult to get, you know, he's, right now, of course, things going on all over the world." Hannity: "But you're also saying, on the other hand, on a need-to-know basis. And that means the President's not on a need-to-know basis? Our duly-elected president, information is being withheld from him?" Burchett: "I believe so. I was told that, even. Yeah, in the SCIF, this one time, where they asked me, where you're quoting, I mean, there was some pretty intense stuff about lifeforms, what they were doing. And different..." Hannity: "Lifeforms alive here? Lifeforms dead here?" Burchett: "Possibly. Both. Both." Hennity: "And vehicles that have been recovered here?" Burchett: "Yeah, and some that have possibly come here, and not in a crash-type setting (laughs). We had an individual that gave..." (Again, this feels like Davis was the guy briefing them. He has spoken about crashed AND landed craft, including the alleged Holloman AFB landing-and-meeting event.) Burchett: "And this was interesting about the whole thing was because, there's all the folks in there, and there's different groups of people, and Rep. Eric Burlison's a dear friend of mine. Because in the beginning, he was a big skeptic (According to Burlison, he still IS a skeptic. ~Joe), you know? And I asked him to join us in some of this stuff because I needed somebody that just wasn't like me, that just had been..." Hannity: "Skepticism's healthy." Burlison: "It's very healthy. I mean, you know...but a lot of people that were skeptics. But we were in this one meeting in a secure environment, and a member came in who is not really friendly to the cause. And really was a disrupter and started asking questions. And the person who was briefing us named names, dates, times, places, events, people." (That sounds exactly like the meticulous, and detail-orientated, Dr. Eric Davis. 😎 ) Burchett: "Because I'd asked a question about Jimmy Carter. There was talk, I just threw it out there, that Carter... I didn't like his politics, but I don't question his faith." (Sad that Burchett even feels the need to mention Carter's politics.) Burchett: "And they said that [Carter] was briefed at one time and became physically upset with the information that he was given." Hannity: "Of course he did." (This seemed like snide remark from Hannity, as in, Carter wasn't a real man and he couldn't handle information like that without getting upset. Cheap shot, but that's Hannity.) Burchett: "Yeah, but he had actually seen a UFO, it's a documented thing. And this person that was briefing us gave the date of that meeting and he gave the receipts. He said, 'You can go to the Carter library,' and he gave the date. and said... And there was, I think four people in the meeting (with Carter), and they listed three of them, and one of them, they weren't sure who it was. So it was probably, you know, CIA or something. And it ended up upsetting [Carter] so much that they pretty much had to clear his calendar for a while. But what is that?" (Again, that sounds like a Davis briefing.) Burchett: "And the thing is, everything that I've...all these rumors that you hear in the movies, in the books and the magazines that I read growing up, just the wild, crazy stuff, some of that stuff now I'm being briefed on and people are telling me that this is actually has occurred. And that, to me, is, I wonder, is this stuff being planted? Is it being pushed out, so that we gradually get a hold of it?" (Hopefully, we get to hear what Burchett and the others heard so we can judge the veracity of it and see if we can somehow confirm any of it.)

Joe Murgia

30,335 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨AUDIT OPPOSITION: As CNN’s Dana Bash hyperventilates about Elon and DOGE access to personal data — — DHS Sec Noem methodically schools her on the AUTHORITY given to DOGE for AUDITS to be carried out: "Elon Musk is part of the administration that is helping us identify where we can find savings and what we can do, and he has gone through the processes to make sure that he has the authority president has appointed him." "The work that he is doing by identifying waste, fraud and abuse — And this information that he has is looking at programs, not focusing on personal data and information, not focusing on it. But he has access to it. You know, we'll be continuing to talk to him about what all he has access to. But this this audit needs to happen to make sure that we are going through a process that adds integrity back into these programs." Legacy media hates the idea of auditing the corrupt bureaucracy, and everyone knows exactly why.

🚨AUDIT OPPOSITION: As CNN’s Dana Bash hyperventilates about Elon and DOGE access to personal data — — DHS Sec Noem methodically schools her on the AUTHORITY given to DOGE for AUDITS to be carried out: "Elon Musk is part of the administration that is helping us identify where we can find savings and what we can do, and he has gone through the processes to make sure that he has the authority president has appointed him." "The work that he is doing by identifying waste, fraud and abuse — And this information that he has is looking at programs, not focusing on personal data and information, not focusing on it. But he has access to it. You know, we'll be continuing to talk to him about what all he has access to. But this this audit needs to happen to make sure that we are going through a process that adds integrity back into these programs." Legacy media hates the idea of auditing the corrupt bureaucracy, and everyone knows exactly why.

Western Lensman

1,296,477 次观看 • 1 年前

🦎 "So there's these species that would resemble insectoids or an insect. And then there's the Reptilians." ~Dr. Eric Davis 🦎 🔥 The Reptilians get PrimeTime coverage 🔥 Katie Pavlich (KP): "Tonight we're diving into one of the largest calls for government transparency in modern history: the calls for UFO and UAP disclosure. Dr. Eric Davis is an astrophysicist who has investigated Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon - UAPs - for 30 years. He says he's seen things that the American public and the world also have a right to see. He says he's personally seeing classified photos of recovered craft and non-human bodies. "The thing is, though, he can't speak out - at least not yet. But he wants to, and he has a message for President Trump. Take a look." Dr. Eric Davis: "Mr. President, with your signature, you could waive the SF-312 NDA to protect UAP whistleblowers like myself. I respectfully request that you take swift and decisive action, as the nature of UAP should not be kept deeply classified." KP: "Dr. Eric Davis joins us now. Great to have you, Doctor. Thanks so much for being here. So you, of course, are requesting presidential immunity before going on the record about exactly what you've seen and producing the proof of the documents. So, what would you need from the President in order for this to happen?" Dr. Eric Davis (ED): "Well, I would need the standard form 312, intelligence NDA to be waived. That way, I could talk about Top Secret SCI information about UAP evidence that I have seen in person, which are records, photographs, reports, and so forth. And those are still classified, and they are not subject to the Freedom of Information Act because it'll probably be...they're probably classified for a 50 to 70-year period, 75-year period, I believe." KP: "Okay, so we're showing some footage from the Department of War on the screen, which is what they've produced so far. They have produced a lot of documents, but clearly, based on what you're telling me, there's a lot more that you think that we should be seeing. So, are you dissatisfied with the amount of information that they produce so far?" ED: "Yeah, I'm not that satisfied. They're going at...I'm not on the inside with the Department of of War or the intelligence agencies, and I'm not working for AARO or PURSUE. I do know that they're working at a pace that they can...at the pace that's set by their ability to hunt down documents and videos and still images and be able to evaluate them for their efficacy as relevant to UAP phenomena or not. And then determine whether they could be declassified without harming the national security. "So there could be more to be revealed, and it would not be...it would not contain harmful information. It would not contain information that would harm the national security. What would do so would be the methods by which the information was acquired from foreign adversaries or foreign friendly nations or wherever the recoveries were done. (I love how he jumped from the meh evidence AARO has released thus far, to crash retrievals, without being asked. 🙂) ~ ED: "So you have to be careful because we want to protect our intelligence methods and sources and just reveal the top level information that verifies and validates the existence of UAP technology that's been recovered by the United States government, as well as the recovery of a small number of NHI (non-human intelligence) bodies that were found dead in some of those cases." KP: "So let's talk about what you say that you know of. You say that you know of four types of aliens. One of those are quote 'Grays,' and you've claimed that, as you just did, we've recovered deceased bodies. Can you describe what they look like?" ED: "There's a minimum of four that we know of, and they...I've seen the evidence and I've seen the records. They variously are described as the Grays, like what everybody saw in 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' at the end of that movie in the final scene. "And then there's the Nordics, which are very tall statured Caucasian looking individuals. And then there's the beings that resemble or look like insects, like a praying-mantis type insect, but they're not an insect. Or they could be, but we don't know. But they...it's just that people, when they're not familiar with something that that presents an ontological shock to them, they'll try to overlay what their imagination helps them understand what it is they're seeing that's so strange and otherworldly. Or outworldly, I should say. "So there's these species that would resemble insectoids or an insect. And then there's the Reptilians for the same case in that their morphology, body structure looks like a reptilian. And they may not be reptilian." KP: "So, if the government has these bodies, where are they keeping them?" ED: "I don't know now. That's a nut that I could not crack when I worked for the Advanced Aerospace Weapon Systems Application Program (AAWSAP), and that was the code name for the DIA's UAP investigation and research project back in 2008 through 2012. "And so, I tried to find that. I've had colleagues that looked for that as well, and we did have a hint of where those bodies went to when they were recovered, but the organization no longer exists." KP: "Wait, so it was given to a private organization rather than to the government?" ED: "No, it was given to a military institute, a medical institute, and it's classified. And that institute has been in existence since 18...since, well, since the Civil War. I don't know the exact year, I'm thinking 1865. And that institute got split up into two or three components and relocated into different military medical institutes by the first Obama administration." KP: "So, if these alien forms are alive, do they eat the same kind of food that humans do or animals do? Or do they breathe regular air? I mean, what kind of beings are they?" ED: "I have no idea because I've never been able to access that type of information, so I don't know what they eat. Most of them that I am aware of were found dead, although I've heard that David Grusch had mentioned that there was one that he knew of that had been captured alive. But I don't know anything else. That's something he and I have not had that conversation to discuss." KP: "All right. Well, Dr. Eric Davis, thank you for joining us, and we'll see if you're able to reveal more. Thank you very much." ED: "Thank you for inviting me, I was happy to be here." KP: "Absolutely, thank you." ED: "Goodnight."

🦎 "So there's these species that would resemble insectoids or an insect. And then there's the Reptilians." ~Dr. Eric Davis 🦎 🔥 The Reptilians get PrimeTime coverage 🔥 Katie Pavlich (KP): "Tonight we're diving into one of the largest calls for government transparency in modern history: the calls for UFO and UAP disclosure. Dr. Eric Davis is an astrophysicist who has investigated Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon - UAPs - for 30 years. He says he's seen things that the American public and the world also have a right to see. He says he's personally seeing classified photos of recovered craft and non-human bodies. "The thing is, though, he can't speak out - at least not yet. But he wants to, and he has a message for President Trump. Take a look." Dr. Eric Davis: "Mr. President, with your signature, you could waive the SF-312 NDA to protect UAP whistleblowers like myself. I respectfully request that you take swift and decisive action, as the nature of UAP should not be kept deeply classified." KP: "Dr. Eric Davis joins us now. Great to have you, Doctor. Thanks so much for being here. So you, of course, are requesting presidential immunity before going on the record about exactly what you've seen and producing the proof of the documents. So, what would you need from the President in order for this to happen?" Dr. Eric Davis (ED): "Well, I would need the standard form 312, intelligence NDA to be waived. That way, I could talk about Top Secret SCI information about UAP evidence that I have seen in person, which are records, photographs, reports, and so forth. And those are still classified, and they are not subject to the Freedom of Information Act because it'll probably be...they're probably classified for a 50 to 70-year period, 75-year period, I believe." KP: "Okay, so we're showing some footage from the Department of War on the screen, which is what they've produced so far. They have produced a lot of documents, but clearly, based on what you're telling me, there's a lot more that you think that we should be seeing. So, are you dissatisfied with the amount of information that they produce so far?" ED: "Yeah, I'm not that satisfied. They're going at...I'm not on the inside with the Department of of War or the intelligence agencies, and I'm not working for AARO or PURSUE. I do know that they're working at a pace that they can...at the pace that's set by their ability to hunt down documents and videos and still images and be able to evaluate them for their efficacy as relevant to UAP phenomena or not. And then determine whether they could be declassified without harming the national security. "So there could be more to be revealed, and it would not be...it would not contain harmful information. It would not contain information that would harm the national security. What would do so would be the methods by which the information was acquired from foreign adversaries or foreign friendly nations or wherever the recoveries were done. (I love how he jumped from the meh evidence AARO has released thus far, to crash retrievals, without being asked. 🙂) ~ ED: "So you have to be careful because we want to protect our intelligence methods and sources and just reveal the top level information that verifies and validates the existence of UAP technology that's been recovered by the United States government, as well as the recovery of a small number of NHI (non-human intelligence) bodies that were found dead in some of those cases." KP: "So let's talk about what you say that you know of. You say that you know of four types of aliens. One of those are quote 'Grays,' and you've claimed that, as you just did, we've recovered deceased bodies. Can you describe what they look like?" ED: "There's a minimum of four that we know of, and they...I've seen the evidence and I've seen the records. They variously are described as the Grays, like what everybody saw in 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' at the end of that movie in the final scene. "And then there's the Nordics, which are very tall statured Caucasian looking individuals. And then there's the beings that resemble or look like insects, like a praying-mantis type insect, but they're not an insect. Or they could be, but we don't know. But they...it's just that people, when they're not familiar with something that that presents an ontological shock to them, they'll try to overlay what their imagination helps them understand what it is they're seeing that's so strange and otherworldly. Or outworldly, I should say. "So there's these species that would resemble insectoids or an insect. And then there's the Reptilians for the same case in that their morphology, body structure looks like a reptilian. And they may not be reptilian." KP: "So, if the government has these bodies, where are they keeping them?" ED: "I don't know now. That's a nut that I could not crack when I worked for the Advanced Aerospace Weapon Systems Application Program (AAWSAP), and that was the code name for the DIA's UAP investigation and research project back in 2008 through 2012. "And so, I tried to find that. I've had colleagues that looked for that as well, and we did have a hint of where those bodies went to when they were recovered, but the organization no longer exists." KP: "Wait, so it was given to a private organization rather than to the government?" ED: "No, it was given to a military institute, a medical institute, and it's classified. And that institute has been in existence since 18...since, well, since the Civil War. I don't know the exact year, I'm thinking 1865. And that institute got split up into two or three components and relocated into different military medical institutes by the first Obama administration." KP: "So, if these alien forms are alive, do they eat the same kind of food that humans do or animals do? Or do they breathe regular air? I mean, what kind of beings are they?" ED: "I have no idea because I've never been able to access that type of information, so I don't know what they eat. Most of them that I am aware of were found dead, although I've heard that David Grusch had mentioned that there was one that he knew of that had been captured alive. But I don't know anything else. That's something he and I have not had that conversation to discuss." KP: "All right. Well, Dr. Eric Davis, thank you for joining us, and we'll see if you're able to reveal more. Thank you very much." ED: "Thank you for inviting me, I was happy to be here." KP: "Absolutely, thank you." ED: "Goodnight."

Joe Murgia

11,414 次观看 • 1 个月前

"It's not a congressional program. Only the president can say anything about this." ~Semivan Semivan: Congress Doesn't Have the Right or Need-To-Know About a Crash Retrieval Program Thoughts? Grusch decided Congress had a need-to-know, and Congress hadn't been told. "Which I don't think was true." ~Semivan ~~~ Semivan: "Some of the congressmen now that are being briefed (laughs) on it are not very happy because they think they have a right to know this. And I like to point out, I spoke to a couple of the committees and I told them, 'Look, it's not a congressional program. It's an executive program, and it's run by the president and only the president can say anything about this. I can't say anything about it, the president has to come out.'" (Note: Semivan was careful to cover his azz and say these were answers about a, hypothetical, crash retrieval program. Although, from his past comments, I'm pretty sure he knows (or at least believes) it exists. See here: Semivan Blockbuster I know where the legacy programs are located. You should take [Grusch] and everything he says to the bank. It's our inalienable right to know about this. ) ~ Semivan: "It's what Dave Grusch said. Dave Grusch...worked for AARO (He meant the UAPTF) and he went to various intelligence agencies and questioned the people that were actually working on these programs. And they all told them the same thing, the same story. So he takes this back, and he decides Congress has a need-to-know, and Congress hasn't been told. Which I don't think was true. He didn't know that, but he thought the public also had a right to know. And I'm perfectly fine... He did the exact right thing you're supposed to do if you're a government employee if you think there's something going on that's not legal. And he did it the right way. So, I give him a load of credit for that. And then he explains what it was, and then he's briefing some of the congressmen on this. Now the congressmen are upset, saying, 'Well, wait a minute, we're in charge of spending for the government and what have you. We should have the ability to know this.' But what Congress doesn't realize is these programs, you know, they exist at a very, very high classified level. They're Special Access Programs, and I would say, maybe the Gang of Eight, if them, have the clearances to basically know of these programs. And even if they were to be told of the programs, they could never discuss it, nor could they ever debate it, publicly. It's not theirs to do. They would be told, officially, but just, you know, as a professional courtesy that these things are going on. "Don't forget, the CIA works directly for the President of the United States, all right? So if the CIA would be running this program (AFAIK, they are. ~Joe), they just, basically, talk to the president and the president talks to them. And those conversations are not subject to congressional notification, approval or anything else. And when CIA goes to the oversight committees and briefs their programs, the committees can't tell them, 'We don't like what you're doing.' Well, they can say that. But the only thing they can do, they can't stop the programs. All they can do is stop the funding. "So, you know, the intelligence agencies that work directly for the president answer to him and him only, really. They do tell Congress, because Congress does give them money and there is...that's been going on since 1975 now, and it's a great thing to do. And they've been very, very open and honest with Congress, and Congress, I think, has been wonderful about it. As a matter of fact, you know, Congress has, basically, said in some of these programs, 'Holy cow, this is great! Give a round of applause, you need more money, because what you guys are doing [is] great.' The relationship has always been very good. I thought, you know, between them." (But the folks in the intelligence agencies who are aware of the alleged Legacy UAP-related programs, do NOT tell Congress about them. Except, as Semivan said, MAYBE some members of the Gang of Eight. Certainly NOT members of Congress like Rep. Anna Paulina Luna or Rep. Eric Burlison. I think they have zero chance of being read in right now.) Semivan: "But that doesn't mean if the president, like Truman or Eisenhower, issued a presidential executive-action document or something along those lines, where he said, 'This is an extraordinary circumstance. I'm creating this super-secret thing that nobody gets to know about, not even Congress.' That's, basically, his...he can do that. That's in the power, that's in the Constitution. He has that right to do that without acknowledging." (THAT is how these alleged Legacy UAP programs are protected.) Semivan: "Now, has he (a president) done that without telling somebody? Probably there's one or two people in Congress that know about it at any given time. Maybe one or two people in the National Security Council know about it. Most presidents probably got a very generalized briefing on it, you know, saying, 'Yeah, this is real. If you wanna know more, we can tell you more. But, if you know more then you don't have plausible deniability anymore. And/or, you can't do anything about it anyway, because we don't understand it. But if something happens [and] we discover something that's groundbreaking or earth shattering, we'll come back and tell ya.' "So, imagine if you're a President of the United States. Do you really want to know this? Do you really want to have that hanging on your shoulders? I think not. Particularly when you have somebody else doing the job for you."

"It's not a congressional program. Only the president can say anything about this." ~Semivan Semivan: Congress Doesn't Have the Right or Need-To-Know About a Crash Retrieval Program Thoughts? Grusch decided Congress had a need-to-know, and Congress hadn't been told. "Which I don't think was true." ~Semivan ~~~ Semivan: "Some of the congressmen now that are being briefed (laughs) on it are not very happy because they think they have a right to know this. And I like to point out, I spoke to a couple of the committees and I told them, 'Look, it's not a congressional program. It's an executive program, and it's run by the president and only the president can say anything about this. I can't say anything about it, the president has to come out.'" (Note: Semivan was careful to cover his azz and say these were answers about a, hypothetical, crash retrieval program. Although, from his past comments, I'm pretty sure he knows (or at least believes) it exists. See here: Semivan Blockbuster I know where the legacy programs are located. You should take [Grusch] and everything he says to the bank. It's our inalienable right to know about this. ) ~ Semivan: "It's what Dave Grusch said. Dave Grusch...worked for AARO (He meant the UAPTF) and he went to various intelligence agencies and questioned the people that were actually working on these programs. And they all told them the same thing, the same story. So he takes this back, and he decides Congress has a need-to-know, and Congress hasn't been told. Which I don't think was true. He didn't know that, but he thought the public also had a right to know. And I'm perfectly fine... He did the exact right thing you're supposed to do if you're a government employee if you think there's something going on that's not legal. And he did it the right way. So, I give him a load of credit for that. And then he explains what it was, and then he's briefing some of the congressmen on this. Now the congressmen are upset, saying, 'Well, wait a minute, we're in charge of spending for the government and what have you. We should have the ability to know this.' But what Congress doesn't realize is these programs, you know, they exist at a very, very high classified level. They're Special Access Programs, and I would say, maybe the Gang of Eight, if them, have the clearances to basically know of these programs. And even if they were to be told of the programs, they could never discuss it, nor could they ever debate it, publicly. It's not theirs to do. They would be told, officially, but just, you know, as a professional courtesy that these things are going on. "Don't forget, the CIA works directly for the President of the United States, all right? So if the CIA would be running this program (AFAIK, they are. ~Joe), they just, basically, talk to the president and the president talks to them. And those conversations are not subject to congressional notification, approval or anything else. And when CIA goes to the oversight committees and briefs their programs, the committees can't tell them, 'We don't like what you're doing.' Well, they can say that. But the only thing they can do, they can't stop the programs. All they can do is stop the funding. "So, you know, the intelligence agencies that work directly for the president answer to him and him only, really. They do tell Congress, because Congress does give them money and there is...that's been going on since 1975 now, and it's a great thing to do. And they've been very, very open and honest with Congress, and Congress, I think, has been wonderful about it. As a matter of fact, you know, Congress has, basically, said in some of these programs, 'Holy cow, this is great! Give a round of applause, you need more money, because what you guys are doing [is] great.' The relationship has always been very good. I thought, you know, between them." (But the folks in the intelligence agencies who are aware of the alleged Legacy UAP-related programs, do NOT tell Congress about them. Except, as Semivan said, MAYBE some members of the Gang of Eight. Certainly NOT members of Congress like Rep. Anna Paulina Luna or Rep. Eric Burlison. I think they have zero chance of being read in right now.) Semivan: "But that doesn't mean if the president, like Truman or Eisenhower, issued a presidential executive-action document or something along those lines, where he said, 'This is an extraordinary circumstance. I'm creating this super-secret thing that nobody gets to know about, not even Congress.' That's, basically, his...he can do that. That's in the power, that's in the Constitution. He has that right to do that without acknowledging." (THAT is how these alleged Legacy UAP programs are protected.) Semivan: "Now, has he (a president) done that without telling somebody? Probably there's one or two people in Congress that know about it at any given time. Maybe one or two people in the National Security Council know about it. Most presidents probably got a very generalized briefing on it, you know, saying, 'Yeah, this is real. If you wanna know more, we can tell you more. But, if you know more then you don't have plausible deniability anymore. And/or, you can't do anything about it anyway, because we don't understand it. But if something happens [and] we discover something that's groundbreaking or earth shattering, we'll come back and tell ya.' "So, imagine if you're a President of the United States. Do you really want to know this? Do you really want to have that hanging on your shoulders? I think not. Particularly when you have somebody else doing the job for you."

Joe Murgia

56,992 次观看 • 1 年前

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.

Randall Carlson

11,737 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨Ross Coulthart Says a Pentagon Faction Is Trying to Put UFO Disclosure Back in the Box Ross Coulthart has made one of his most direct claims yet about the battle taking place behind the scenes over UFO disclosure. He says he believes a that a control group inside the Pentagon is attempting to restrict the narrative, slow the momentum toward disclosure and prevent the public conversation from reaching the issue of alleged crash retrieval and reverse engineering programs. Coulthart argues that the creation of new governance and scientific advisory structures may be part of that struggle. He stressed that many of the people appointed to those bodies could have entirely good intentions, but warned that others may be attempting to place institutional roadblocks in the path of further transparency. He also described the original 2016 / 2017 launch of To The Stars Academy as a form of controlled disclosure driven by a faction within the national security establishment that believed it was time to reveal something to the public. In Coulthart's view though that process may have been designed to limit the discussion to military encounters and unexplained objects while keeping the alleged retrieval programs outside the accepted narrative. That all changed when David Grusch publicly alleged the existence of a long running crash retrieval and reverse engineering program. Coulthart believes that Grusch's testimony disrupted the planned disclosure process by forcing the central allegation into the open. The debate could no longer remain confined to whether unusual objects were being observed. It had moved directly into claims that material and potentially non human technology had in fact already been recovered. Coulthart then turned his attention toward Lue Elizondo, confirming that Elizondo was the person he had previously suggested could be considered for a major UAP transparency position. He said he respects Elizondo and believes he is in a difficult situation because of the ongoing restrictions imposed by his security obligations. At the same time, Coulthart said Elizondo needs to be more forthcoming about his previous roles, while making the extraordinary allegation that Elizondo had held a role within the legacy program. That assertion has not been publicly established through documentary evidence, but Coulthart presented it as something that is well known among people familiar with the program. He also claimed that some figures oppose Elizondo being placed in a position of authority because they believe he was previously involved in an effort to control how much the public was told. Coulthart suggested that former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper may have supported a carefully managed narrative, with Elizondo acting as a credible and publicly acceptable spokesman. Coulthart didn't actually accuse Elizondo or others involved in that effort of acting maliciously. He described them as patriots who believed they were serving their country, even if the intended disclosure was narrower than what the public was entitled to know. His larger warning was aimed at the bitter factionalism now spreading through the UFO community. Coulthart believes internal feuds, private attacks and disputes over personalities are creating exactly the division that opponents of disclosure need. Divide the movement, discredit its leading voices and the entire issue can be placed back inside the classified system for another generation. Coulthart also said there is no doubt in his mind that a non human intelligence is engaging with this planet, adding that people on Capitol Hill and inside the Pentagon had privately confirmed that conclusion to him during the same week. #RossCoulthart #UAPDisclosure #LueElizondo #DavidGrusch #Pentagon #UAP #UFO #CrashRetrievals #DisclosureNow Source:

🚨Ross Coulthart Says a Pentagon Faction Is Trying to Put UFO Disclosure Back in the Box Ross Coulthart has made one of his most direct claims yet about the battle taking place behind the scenes over UFO disclosure. He says he believes a that a control group inside the Pentagon is attempting to restrict the narrative, slow the momentum toward disclosure and prevent the public conversation from reaching the issue of alleged crash retrieval and reverse engineering programs. Coulthart argues that the creation of new governance and scientific advisory structures may be part of that struggle. He stressed that many of the people appointed to those bodies could have entirely good intentions, but warned that others may be attempting to place institutional roadblocks in the path of further transparency. He also described the original 2016 / 2017 launch of To The Stars Academy as a form of controlled disclosure driven by a faction within the national security establishment that believed it was time to reveal something to the public. In Coulthart's view though that process may have been designed to limit the discussion to military encounters and unexplained objects while keeping the alleged retrieval programs outside the accepted narrative. That all changed when David Grusch publicly alleged the existence of a long running crash retrieval and reverse engineering program. Coulthart believes that Grusch's testimony disrupted the planned disclosure process by forcing the central allegation into the open. The debate could no longer remain confined to whether unusual objects were being observed. It had moved directly into claims that material and potentially non human technology had in fact already been recovered. Coulthart then turned his attention toward Lue Elizondo, confirming that Elizondo was the person he had previously suggested could be considered for a major UAP transparency position. He said he respects Elizondo and believes he is in a difficult situation because of the ongoing restrictions imposed by his security obligations. At the same time, Coulthart said Elizondo needs to be more forthcoming about his previous roles, while making the extraordinary allegation that Elizondo had held a role within the legacy program. That assertion has not been publicly established through documentary evidence, but Coulthart presented it as something that is well known among people familiar with the program. He also claimed that some figures oppose Elizondo being placed in a position of authority because they believe he was previously involved in an effort to control how much the public was told. Coulthart suggested that former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper may have supported a carefully managed narrative, with Elizondo acting as a credible and publicly acceptable spokesman. Coulthart didn't actually accuse Elizondo or others involved in that effort of acting maliciously. He described them as patriots who believed they were serving their country, even if the intended disclosure was narrower than what the public was entitled to know. His larger warning was aimed at the bitter factionalism now spreading through the UFO community. Coulthart believes internal feuds, private attacks and disputes over personalities are creating exactly the division that opponents of disclosure need. Divide the movement, discredit its leading voices and the entire issue can be placed back inside the classified system for another generation. Coulthart also said there is no doubt in his mind that a non human intelligence is engaging with this planet, adding that people on Capitol Hill and inside the Pentagon had privately confirmed that conclusion to him during the same week. #RossCoulthart #UAPDisclosure #LueElizondo #DavidGrusch #Pentagon #UAP #UFO #CrashRetrievals #DisclosureNow Source:

Skywatch Signal

17,574 次观看 • 3 个月前