Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

WHOEVER BUILT THIS HAS ZERO FEAR. SOMEONE CONNECTED 200 GROK BOTS INTO ONE AUTONOMOUS TRADING SYSTEM. -> One bot researches. -> Another tracks markets. -> Another analyzes sentiment. -> Another watches on-chain activity. But instead of leaving 200 separate outputs everywhere, they’re all connected through a CONTEXT GRAPH that... show more

MAX

11,879 subscribers

61,804 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Finanzen

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

43 Kommentare

Profilbild von Gipp 🦅

Gipp 🦅vor 22 Tagen

consolidating 200 agent outputs into one brain just changes everything i’d test that

Profilbild von MAX

MAXvor 22 Tagen

that’s the part I’d want to test too. The coordination is what makes it interesting.

Profilbild von Dekos

Dekosvor 22 Tagen

As far as I'm concerned, the visualization is just the best

Profilbild von MAX

MAXvor 22 Tagen

Can’t just stop rewatching it fr

Profilbild von saturn

saturnvor 22 Tagen

200 bots, insane

Profilbild von MAX

MAXvor 22 Tagen

200 bots is actually crazy bro Can’t wait to try it out too

Profilbild von venus

venusvor 22 Tagen

swarms are future

Profilbild von MAX

MAXvor 22 Tagen

Agent swarms are definitely heading that way.

Profilbild von Bober_smart

Bober_smartvor 22 Tagen

It looks very high-tech

Profilbild von MAX

MAXvor 22 Tagen

Fr, the whole setup looks like something from the future.

Profilbild von Orion

Orionvor 22 Tagen

A swarm without a shared context is just expensive noise

Profilbild von MAX

MAXvor 22 Tagen

Exactly. The shared context is what turns all those agents into an actual system.

Profilbild von Alex Stone

Alex Stonevor 22 Tagen

200 bots working together is kind of wild.

Profilbild von MAX

MAXvor 22 Tagen

Yeah bro, 200 agents working together is seriously wild.

Profilbild von Veles

Velesvor 22 Tagen

The context graph is the actual innovation here, not the 200 bots

Profilbild von MAX

MAXvor 22 Tagen

200 bots means nothing if they can’t share context and coordinate.

Profilbild von hammertime

hammertimevor 22 Tagen

this is massive bots

Profilbild von MAX

MAXvor 22 Tagen

Fr, 200 bots is an insane setup.

Profilbild von Maddie

Maddievor 21 Tagen

The node map looks visually stunning, but what's the actual win rate? A system this complex is either printing generational wealth or glitching out and market buying absolute garbage at the local top. Show the PnL! 📊👀

Profilbild von connin

conninvor 21 Tagen

another good sign that connection, communication, and collaboration are way more importang then model size and parameter counts. great work!

Profilbild von Marian

Marianvor 20 Tagen

I'd like to use something like that, too...🧲

Profilbild von Zentrix⌚️

Zentrix⌚️vor 22 Tagen

the context graph is the part that changes everything

Profilbild von MAX

MAXvor 22 Tagen

Exactly, that’s what ties the whole swarm together. Without it, 200 bots would just be noise.

Profilbild von Winter

Wintervor 22 Tagen

coordination concentrates failure risk in one trading brain

Profilbild von Alex’s AI Tool Notes

Alex’s AI Tool Notesvor 21 Tagen

200个bot串一个交易系统？听着就瘆人。跑得动是本事，跑崩了就是连环车祸。我先搬个小板凳看看。

Profilbild von Zano.com | VE3.com | Bit1.com is for sale!

Zano.com | VE3.com | Bit1.com is for sale!vor 21 Tagen

Sounds fancy.. real talk how much profit that thing already produces

Profilbild von AcrypL 😶‍🌫️

AcrypL 😶‍🌫️vor 21 Tagen

Genius

Profilbild von Ruuj

Ruujvor 22 Tagen

Agent swarms are game changer, appreciate sharing Article max.

Profilbild von Ayush Sin

Ayush Sinvor 21 Tagen

This more looks like an eye!

Profilbild von The Genesis World - Eternt

The Genesis World - Eterntvor 21 Tagen

More visuals than brain

Profilbild von Andrew J Harris

Andrew J Harrisvor 21 Tagen

How does it place the trades? It’s against the guard rails to place live trades

Profilbild von twinedon

twinedonvor 22 Tagen

200 bots are noise without that context graph tying them into one brain

Profilbild von VANTERRA

VANTERRAvor 22 Tagen

This is insane 200 bot

Profilbild von Sammy

Sammyvor 22 Tagen

200 groks is insane idea tbh

Profilbild von twelvepills

twelvepillsvor 22 Tagen

sounds like a lawsuit waiting

Profilbild von Yakubu David block

Yakubu David blockvor 22 Tagen

Damn

Profilbild von Max Bevza

Max Bevzavor 21 Tagen

this is peak crypto degen behavior right here

Profilbild von Akbar Shaik

Akbar Shaikvor 21 Tagen

200 agents generating information is impressive, but turning that information into shared, structured context is what makes the swarm useful instead of noisy.

Profilbild von 👑. Ndiyo 𝕏

👑. Ndiyo 𝕏vor 21 Tagen

Okay, sounds cool. What’s the output like ? Does it trade the markets accurately ? If YES how do I get my hands on such a system?

Profilbild von Roan

Roanvor 22 Tagen

amazing visual maxy, this teach me more than paid courses

Profilbild von MAX

MAXvor 22 Tagen

Glad it helped champ! Always happy when the visuals make things click.

Profilbild von Pb🇮🇷

Pb🇮🇷vor 21 Tagen

@grok poor man enterprise how do I free do this old laptop

Profilbild von Elway 🐴

Elway 🐴vor 21 Tagen

Fake

Ähnliche Videos

SpaceXAI engineer, Lauren Tan: "the upgrade was never a smarter model, it was wiring 20 Grok Bots into one graph they hand work to each other now, with zero input from me that took me from 6 tasks a day to 200+, my team ships overnight while I sleep" in a 55-minute session, a SpaceXAI engineer wires a full team of Grok Bots into one graph from scratch worth more than a $500 course on agentic engineering watch today, then read how to give that fleet a shared memory so it stops repeating your mistakes in the article below

SpaceXAI engineer, Lauren Tan: "the upgrade was never a smarter model, it was wiring 20 Grok Bots into one graph they hand work to each other now, with zero input from me that took me from 6 tasks a day to 200+, my team ships overnight while I sleep" in a 55-minute session, a SpaceXAI engineer wires a full team of Grok Bots into one graph from scratch worth more than a $500 course on agentic engineering watch today, then read how to give that fleet a shared memory so it stops repeating your mistakes in the article below

KingWilliam

29,071 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

Claude read one article about trading bots, selected 7 GitHub repos, connected them into a pipeline and deployed the whole system. It made $847 overnight. → Scanned over 412,000 trades autonomously → Tracked whale wallets and detected insider activity → Analyzed data every few seconds and decided whether to buy, sell or pass → Executed 47 trades with zero manual intervention

Claude read one article about trading bots, selected 7 GitHub repos, connected them into a pipeline and deployed the whole system. It made $847 overnight. → Scanned over 412,000 trades autonomously → Tracked whale wallets and detected insider activity → Analyzed data every few seconds and decided whether to buy, sell or pass → Executed 47 trades with zero manual intervention

0xMarioNawfal

62,939 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GROK BOT MADE ME 3 TRADING BOTS IN 15 MINUTES +$2,353 in my wallet the next day, I quit my job that same day. I wrote one prompt and answered a few questions. Grok Bot took three strategies - MACD, RSI + VWAP, CVD divergence. Assigned each bot its own. The first one catches momentum - sees when volume picks up and gets in before the crowd wakes up. The second one trades reversals - waits for everyone to panic and bets against them. The third one scans divergences - when price says one thing but money does another, it follows the money. Built the structure itself, wrote the backtest, ran each strategy on historical data, set up the risk manager, deployed - all on its own. Three bots, three accounts, each trades differently - they don't know about each other. I named it Cabal. Started with $20, then $70, then $140, then $320, then $2,353 in a day. Citadel, Jane Street, Two Sigma have been trading with bots for years - they don't feel fear, greed, or FOMO - they only listen to algorithms. The market rewards systems.

GROK BOT MADE ME 3 TRADING BOTS IN 15 MINUTES +$2,353 in my wallet the next day, I quit my job that same day. I wrote one prompt and answered a few questions. Grok Bot took three strategies - MACD, RSI + VWAP, CVD divergence. Assigned each bot its own. The first one catches momentum - sees when volume picks up and gets in before the crowd wakes up. The second one trades reversals - waits for everyone to panic and bets against them. The third one scans divergences - when price says one thing but money does another, it follows the money. Built the structure itself, wrote the backtest, ran each strategy on historical data, set up the risk manager, deployed - all on its own. Three bots, three accounts, each trades differently - they don't know about each other. I named it Cabal. Started with $20, then $70, then $140, then $320, then $2,353 in a day. Citadel, Jane Street, Two Sigma have been trading with bots for years - they don't feel fear, greed, or FOMO - they only listen to algorithms. The market rewards systems.

Archive

278,023 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Found a setup that replaces a team of researchers with 300 AI agents and one shared graph. the interesting part is what happens after all 300 come back with different pieces of the answer. because now you don’t have 300 agents. you have: 300 outputs → hundreds of sources → repeated entities → overlapping claims → contradictions → thousands of possible relationships and all of that has to collapse into one structure. that’s what the context graph is doing. instead of: agent → report you get: agents → sources → entities → edges → contradictions → verification → one graph every source becomes a node. every shared entity creates a connection. 300 agents can create information. the graph is what turns that information into memory the next agent can actually use. that’s the anatomy behind the setup ↓

Found a setup that replaces a team of researchers with 300 AI agents and one shared graph. the interesting part is what happens after all 300 come back with different pieces of the answer. because now you don’t have 300 agents. you have: 300 outputs → hundreds of sources → repeated entities → overlapping claims → contradictions → thousands of possible relationships and all of that has to collapse into one structure. that’s what the context graph is doing. instead of: agent → report you get: agents → sources → entities → edges → contradictions → verification → one graph every source becomes a node. every shared entity creates a connection. 300 agents can create information. the graph is what turns that information into memory the next agent can actually use. that’s the anatomy behind the setup ↓

Ricker

19,652 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

A 14-year-old from China built three separate AI brains connected to Claude Code - and each one grows every day on its own. One brain for code, one for projects, one for everything else in his life. 600+ conversations on one topic in a single node - everything linked, everything accessible in one request without copying between tabs. But the main thing isn't storage. If Claude Code made a mistake and he corrected it once - the system remembered. That same mistake never happened again. No re-explaining context, no starting from zero - Claude already knows how he thinks. Instead of one giant messy file- a stack of smaller brains passing context to each other. Brain to brain to brain - just stacking intelligence while his classmates do homework by hand.

A 14-year-old from China built three separate AI brains connected to Claude Code - and each one grows every day on its own. One brain for code, one for projects, one for everything else in his life. 600+ conversations on one topic in a single node - everything linked, everything accessible in one request without copying between tabs. But the main thing isn't storage. If Claude Code made a mistake and he corrected it once - the system remembered. That same mistake never happened again. No re-explaining context, no starting from zero - Claude already knows how he thinks. Instead of one giant messy file- a stack of smaller brains passing context to each other. Brain to brain to brain - just stacking intelligence while his classmates do homework by hand.

Noisy

22,622 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

WHOEVER LEAKED THIS HAS ZERO FEAR SOMEONE CONNECTED 4,200 GROK BOTS TO RUN A ONE-PERSON CONTENT DESK. Not 50. Not 350. Four thousand two hundred agents wired into one system. I thought it was just another AI experiment until I saw the architecture. Floor 1 scans X, TikTok, YouTube, Reddit and news every few seconds. Floor 2 hunts only for hooks, angles and formats that already spread. Floor 3 writes threads, scripts, carousels and reply chains in parallel. Floor 4 generates thumbnails, visuals and clip variants. Floor 5 tests timing, distribution, quotes and follow-ups. Floor 6 kills anything mid, off-brand or risky before it ever reaches the owner. Then one HEAD OF STUDIO Grok sits on top of all 4,200. It does not send him a mountain of drafts. It sends 3–7 pieces a day that actually deserve to be posted. No writers. No editors. No content team. No staring at a blank page. Just 4,200 Grok bots passing work between each other 24/7. The craziest part? The owner said he barely touches the system anymore. He just publishes what survives. FULL GUIDE ON HOW TO BUILD IT BELOW

Ridark

98,833 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

I GAVE MY GROK BOT $500 BY EVENING IT WAS ALREADY $8,000 yesterday I vibe-coded a bot for trading on Robinhood Chain took me literally 2 hours here’s how it works: five agents, one position at a time, one veto could kill any trade at one point 5 losses took the balance down to $286 then Grok analyzed the trades and changed the strategy next trade was $HOODAI with a $75 entry the bot spotted 3 connected wallets getting ready to sell it exited before the dump and locked a 31x after that it rotated profits into 2 more launches and rejected 294 coins $500 turned into $7,931 by the evening all from a bot I built in 2 hours

I GAVE MY GROK BOT $500 BY EVENING IT WAS ALREADY $8,000 yesterday I vibe-coded a bot for trading on Robinhood Chain took me literally 2 hours here’s how it works: five agents, one position at a time, one veto could kill any trade at one point 5 losses took the balance down to $286 then Grok analyzed the trades and changed the strategy next trade was $HOODAI with a $75 entry the bot spotted 3 connected wallets getting ready to sell it exited before the dump and locked a 31x after that it rotated profits into 2 more launches and rejected 294 coins $500 turned into $7,931 by the evening all from a bot I built in 2 hours

winkle.

20,162 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

SpaceXAI engineer, ex-Cursor: "i haven't hired a human in a year, i just spin up another bot 50 of them run on a $200 plan, and they clear what used to be a 3-week sprint before i finish breakfast we did $1.2M this year on a headcount of one" in a 54-minute workshop, a SpaceXAI engineer shows the setup that runs 50 bots off one plan this is the piece almost nobody builds, and it's why their agents fall apart past three watch it, then build the same memory into your team with the 12-step system in the article below

SpaceXAI engineer, ex-Cursor: "i haven't hired a human in a year, i just spin up another bot 50 of them run on a $200 plan, and they clear what used to be a 3-week sprint before i finish breakfast we did $1.2M this year on a headcount of one" in a 54-minute workshop, a SpaceXAI engineer shows the setup that runs 50 bots off one plan this is the piece almost nobody builds, and it's why their agents fall apart past three watch it, then build the same memory into your team with the 12-step system in the article below

KingWilliam

1,385,068 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

i gave Elon's Grok Bot $50 and told it "pay for yourself or you die" 48 hours later it's holding $5,273 and it's still alive autonomous trading agent on polymarket zero code this time. the bot has its own computer in the cloud, its own browser, its own terminal. it trades with my laptop shut every 10 minutes it: → scans 500-1000 markets → reads live X sentiment (it's grok, it sees every post on this app) → builds fair value, flags mispricing > 8% → calculates position size (kelly criterion, max 6% bankroll) → executes in its own browser → pays its own $200 subscription from profits if the balance hits $0, i cancel the subscription. the bot dies day one it dipped to $11. it dropped crypto and moved to weather markets, front-running NOAA updates so it learned to survive setup took one evening: create the bot, run one trade on your screen while it watches, put the skill on a schedule, connect telegram no VPS. no API keys. no rust last winter i built this exact system by hand. 3 weeks of rust. it made $2,980 in its first 48 hours grok bot beat my own code in one evening $50 → $5,273 in 48 hours how much do u think it'll have in a week?

i gave Elon's Grok Bot $50 and told it "pay for yourself or you die" 48 hours later it's holding $5,273 and it's still alive autonomous trading agent on polymarket zero code this time. the bot has its own computer in the cloud, its own browser, its own terminal. it trades with my laptop shut every 10 minutes it: → scans 500-1000 markets → reads live X sentiment (it's grok, it sees every post on this app) → builds fair value, flags mispricing > 8% → calculates position size (kelly criterion, max 6% bankroll) → executes in its own browser → pays its own $200 subscription from profits if the balance hits $0, i cancel the subscription. the bot dies day one it dipped to $11. it dropped crypto and moved to weather markets, front-running NOAA updates so it learned to survive setup took one evening: create the bot, run one trade on your screen while it watches, put the skill on a schedule, connect telegram no VPS. no API keys. no rust last winter i built this exact system by hand. 3 weeks of rust. it made $2,980 in its first 48 hours grok bot beat my own code in one evening $50 → $5,273 in 48 hours how much do u think it'll have in a week?

Argona

1,260,731 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

THIS GUY TURNED ONE OBSIDIAN VAULT INTO A SHARED BRAIN FOR 5 CLAUDE AGENTS BUILT TO HANDLE 80% OF A SOLO DEVELOPER’S WORK. 00:03 he zooms out and hundreds of connected notes appear on screen. it is the perfect visual for Claude working from one shared project memory instead of starting from zero every session. most developers give Claude 1 file and 1 prompt. this setup gives it the architecture, coding rules, tests, client briefs, and previous decisions before it writes anything. obsidian becomes the memory layer, storing everything in markdown files Claude can read alongside the codebase. every agent works from the same context instead of repeating the same questions. then 5 specialists split the job. one researches, one plans, one codes, one reviews, and one deploys while the developer only controls the important decisions. one vault, 5 agents, 2 model tiers, and a $50 to $150 monthly stack can turn Claude from a chatbot into a small development team.

THIS GUY TURNED ONE OBSIDIAN VAULT INTO A SHARED BRAIN FOR 5 CLAUDE AGENTS BUILT TO HANDLE 80% OF A SOLO DEVELOPER’S WORK. 00:03 he zooms out and hundreds of connected notes appear on screen. it is the perfect visual for Claude working from one shared project memory instead of starting from zero every session. most developers give Claude 1 file and 1 prompt. this setup gives it the architecture, coding rules, tests, client briefs, and previous decisions before it writes anything. obsidian becomes the memory layer, storing everything in markdown files Claude can read alongside the codebase. every agent works from the same context instead of repeating the same questions. then 5 specialists split the job. one researches, one plans, one codes, one reviews, and one deploys while the developer only controls the important decisions. one vault, 5 agents, 2 model tiers, and a $50 to $150 monthly stack can turn Claude from a chatbot into a small development team.

Gipp 🦅

10,799 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

CLAUDE MADE ME 3 TRADING BOTS IN 15 MINUTES +$2,503 in my wallet the next day, I quit my job that same day. I wrote one prompt and answered a few questions. Claude took three strategies - MACD, RSI + VWAP, CVD divergence. Assigned each bot its own. The first one catches momentum - sees when volume picks up and gets in before the crowd wakes up. The second one trades reversals - waits for everyone to panic and bets against them. The third one scans divergences - when price says one thing but money does another, it follows the money. Built the structure itself, wrote the backtest, ran each strategy on historical data, set up the risk manager, deployed - all on its own. Three bots, three accounts, each trades differently - they don't know about each other. Started with $1, then $5, then $10, then $50, then $2,503 in a day. Citadel, Jane Street, Two Sigma have been trading with bots for years - they don't feel fear, greed, or FOMO - they only listen to algorithms. The market rewards systems.

CLAUDE MADE ME 3 TRADING BOTS IN 15 MINUTES +$2,503 in my wallet the next day, I quit my job that same day. I wrote one prompt and answered a few questions. Claude took three strategies - MACD, RSI + VWAP, CVD divergence. Assigned each bot its own. The first one catches momentum - sees when volume picks up and gets in before the crowd wakes up. The second one trades reversals - waits for everyone to panic and bets against them. The third one scans divergences - when price says one thing but money does another, it follows the money. Built the structure itself, wrote the backtest, ran each strategy on historical data, set up the risk manager, deployed - all on its own. Three bots, three accounts, each trades differently - they don't know about each other. Started with $1, then $5, then $10, then $50, then $2,503 in a day. Citadel, Jane Street, Two Sigma have been trading with bots for years - they don't feel fear, greed, or FOMO - they only listen to algorithms. The market rewards systems.

zostaff

1,950,547 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

THIS GUY TURNED OBSIDIAN INTO A DIGITAL TWIN OF HIS OWN BRAIN, 400 PLUS NODES, 6 KNOWLEDGE CLUSTERS, 1 LOCAL VAULT, AND A MAP THAT GETS SMARTER WITH EVERY NOTE 00:05 the graph begins as one dense sphere, then individual paths light up across the screen, showing how a single note can connect to dozens of ideas instead of disappearing inside another folder. most people store information in straight lines, one file after another. his vault grows like a network, research connects to projects, projects connect to decisions, and old notes keep feeding new work months later. after 100 notes, it still feels like storage. around 300, clusters begin exposing repeated interests, unfinished threads, and topics that keep returning even after he stops thinking about them. with claude connected, the network becomes usable context. instead of pasting 20 files into one chat, an agent can follow 5 linked notes, pull original sources, compare old decisions, and write the result back into the same vault. a real second brain is not the pretty graph. it is a local system where every new thought strengthens old connections, buried ideas come back when needed, and knowledge keeps compounding without leaving your machine.

THIS GUY TURNED OBSIDIAN INTO A DIGITAL TWIN OF HIS OWN BRAIN, 400 PLUS NODES, 6 KNOWLEDGE CLUSTERS, 1 LOCAL VAULT, AND A MAP THAT GETS SMARTER WITH EVERY NOTE 00:05 the graph begins as one dense sphere, then individual paths light up across the screen, showing how a single note can connect to dozens of ideas instead of disappearing inside another folder. most people store information in straight lines, one file after another. his vault grows like a network, research connects to projects, projects connect to decisions, and old notes keep feeding new work months later. after 100 notes, it still feels like storage. around 300, clusters begin exposing repeated interests, unfinished threads, and topics that keep returning even after he stops thinking about them. with claude connected, the network becomes usable context. instead of pasting 20 files into one chat, an agent can follow 5 linked notes, pull original sources, compare old decisions, and write the result back into the same vault. a real second brain is not the pretty graph. it is a local system where every new thought strengthens old connections, buried ideas come back when needed, and knowledge keeps compounding without leaving your machine.

Gipp 🦅

20,823 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Onchain trading still feels more fragmented than it should. One tab for discovery. Another for market data. Another to check wallets. Another to execute the trade. Then another one to track what happened after. I spent some time actually trading through Warden / Halo Token Terminal today, and this is where the “one terminal” idea started to make sense. - Discovery before execution Instead of moving between Dexscreener, CoinGecko and a separate trading interface, I can filter the market directly across Robinhood Chain, Arc, Base and BNB Chain by liquidity, FDV, volume, age, category, signals and even Top Cooks activity. I picked $JOLLY on Robinhood Chain and took it one step further with Warden Buffett. The AI chart read doesn’t simply throw out a bullish or bearish prediction. It breaks down trend, momentum, MACD, pool flow, liquidity, holder concentration, support/resistance and contract risk across multiple timeframes. In this case it actually came back with “direction unsettled” and gave me the levels and market structure behind that conclusion. That is much more useful to me than an AI tool pretending it knows where price goes next. - Analysis and execution stay on the same screen From the AI read, I went directly into a real USDG → JOLLY trade. Before I signed anything, the terminal showed me the route, estimated amount received, minimum received, slippage, platform fee and whether the route was gasless. I knew the downside of the execution before confirming it. No separate swap tab. No moving assets around just to continue the workflow. Warden also keeps PnL tracking inside the terminal, so discovery, analysis, execution and position tracking don’t become four different jobs. - The part I find more interesting than another price screener Top Cooks adds another layer to discovery. Instead of only asking what is moving?, I can see where consistently profitable wallets are active and compare their net flows over 1H, 24H and 7D. That turns wallet activity into another input before making a trade rather than something I have to research separately afterward. Then the leaderboard ties the whole system together: trading activity, new traders and referrals all contribute to the points competition. For this trade, Warden effectively replaced several tabs I would normally keep open at the same time. Discovery → AI analysis → wallet flows → execution → PnL All inside one terminal. If you want to test workflow yourself, you can join through link,

Onchain trading still feels more fragmented than it should. One tab for discovery. Another for market data. Another to check wallets. Another to execute the trade. Then another one to track what happened after. I spent some time actually trading through Warden / Halo Token Terminal today, and this is where the “one terminal” idea started to make sense. - Discovery before execution Instead of moving between Dexscreener, CoinGecko and a separate trading interface, I can filter the market directly across Robinhood Chain, Arc, Base and BNB Chain by liquidity, FDV, volume, age, category, signals and even Top Cooks activity. I picked $JOLLY on Robinhood Chain and took it one step further with Warden Buffett. The AI chart read doesn’t simply throw out a bullish or bearish prediction. It breaks down trend, momentum, MACD, pool flow, liquidity, holder concentration, support/resistance and contract risk across multiple timeframes. In this case it actually came back with “direction unsettled” and gave me the levels and market structure behind that conclusion. That is much more useful to me than an AI tool pretending it knows where price goes next. - Analysis and execution stay on the same screen From the AI read, I went directly into a real USDG → JOLLY trade. Before I signed anything, the terminal showed me the route, estimated amount received, minimum received, slippage, platform fee and whether the route was gasless. I knew the downside of the execution before confirming it. No separate swap tab. No moving assets around just to continue the workflow. Warden also keeps PnL tracking inside the terminal, so discovery, analysis, execution and position tracking don’t become four different jobs. - The part I find more interesting than another price screener Top Cooks adds another layer to discovery. Instead of only asking what is moving?, I can see where consistently profitable wallets are active and compare their net flows over 1H, 24H and 7D. That turns wallet activity into another input before making a trade rather than something I have to research separately afterward. Then the leaderboard ties the whole system together: trading activity, new traders and referrals all contribute to the points competition. For this trade, Warden effectively replaced several tabs I would normally keep open at the same time. Discovery → AI analysis → wallet flows → execution → PnL All inside one terminal. If you want to test workflow yourself, you can join through link,

Arjantit

25,616 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

This guy built a trading bot with Claude and made $87,000 on Polymarket His bot trades the microstructure of short-term crypto Up/Down markets using high-frequency scalping, with elements of swing arbitrage and hedged trading His strategy is simple: > Compares the underlying asset price with the price on Polymarket and trades mispricings > First buys one side, then after the price moves, buys the opposite side so that Up + Down stays below $1 > Uses asymmetric sizing: small size on cheap tails, while most of the volume goes into the 60-97c range This guy’s Polymarket account: Using this strategy and clean execution, he turned $19.7k into $87.1k in one month of trading

This guy built a trading bot with Claude and made $87,000 on Polymarket His bot trades the microstructure of short-term crypto Up/Down markets using high-frequency scalping, with elements of swing arbitrage and hedged trading His strategy is simple: > Compares the underlying asset price with the price on Polymarket and trades mispricings > First buys one side, then after the price moves, buys the opposite side so that Up + Down stays below $1 > Uses asymmetric sizing: small size on cheap tails, while most of the volume goes into the 60-97c range This guy’s Polymarket account: Using this strategy and clean execution, he turned $19.7k into $87.1k in one month of trading

VALIX

21,254 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

WOAH 🚨 MASSIVE Democrats ActBlue money laundering scam uncovered Democrats are pretending to buy $200,000 houses and CREATING $200 MILLION DOLLAR MORTGAGES and then laundering the money through wire transfers This isn’t uncommon, THEY’RE FOUND ALL OVER THE NATION RAN THROUGH ACTBLUE “Magic mortgages — Let's imagine you buy a house — for $200,000 and it's funded by one of the North American banks. We'll just say Wells Fargo, please don't sue me. All the records, including the mortgage, the deed of trust, the Alta insurance policy, all of those records are recorded in the county record. Then just a few minutes later, your $200,000 house suddenly has a $200 million magic mortgage that comes through. It's nothing but a wire that goes through the title company. There's no lender involved because it's a hard money loan, what they call a cash hard money loan. But because it goes through a title company, there's no notation of who the lender is and it goes on through the system. Now what's interesting is, and this is what caught our attention, these are ActBlue officers, corporate officers. Once we found one, it led to another and, and another, and another and another. So we have them all over the nation. And this is just one small fragment of the human map. You leave this digital dust, if you will. This is one small fragment.“ Democrats ActBlue Magic Mortgage Money Laundering Scheme: This is one of the many ways Democrats launder Dark Money

WOAH 🚨 MASSIVE Democrats ActBlue money laundering scam uncovered Democrats are pretending to buy $200,000 houses and CREATING $200 MILLION DOLLAR MORTGAGES and then laundering the money through wire transfers This isn’t uncommon, THEY’RE FOUND ALL OVER THE NATION RAN THROUGH ACTBLUE “Magic mortgages — Let's imagine you buy a house — for $200,000 and it's funded by one of the North American banks. We'll just say Wells Fargo, please don't sue me. All the records, including the mortgage, the deed of trust, the Alta insurance policy, all of those records are recorded in the county record. Then just a few minutes later, your $200,000 house suddenly has a $200 million magic mortgage that comes through. It's nothing but a wire that goes through the title company. There's no lender involved because it's a hard money loan, what they call a cash hard money loan. But because it goes through a title company, there's no notation of who the lender is and it goes on through the system. Now what's interesting is, and this is what caught our attention, these are ActBlue officers, corporate officers. Once we found one, it led to another and, and another, and another and another. So we have them all over the nation. And this is just one small fragment of the human map. You leave this digital dust, if you will. This is one small fragment.“ Democrats ActBlue Magic Mortgage Money Laundering Scheme: This is one of the many ways Democrats launder Dark Money

Wall Street Apes

1,077,024 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

i merged all my AI agents into one brain Claude Code, Codex, Gemini: one team, one memory, zero re-briefing result: 8+ hours a week back, and every agent already knows my projects, my clients and how i think here's the setup with Jarvix: 1. dump your context once: projects, clients, writing style, how you make decisions.. it builds your personal model from your actual AI interactions 2. switch agents mid-task with zero re-briefing: Claude Code builds, Codex reviews, Gemini researches, all reading the same context 3. it carries what YOU choose across sessions.. never start a chat from zero again 4. when it's time to act, it pulls the right agents together as one team instead of five separate assistants the unlock isn't another agent. it's that your context finally travels agents without shared memory are five interns on their first day, forever. agents with it are a team that's worked with you for years not more agents. one shared context that's the right bet P.S. thanks to the Jarvix team for the early access

i merged all my AI agents into one brain Claude Code, Codex, Gemini: one team, one memory, zero re-briefing result: 8+ hours a week back, and every agent already knows my projects, my clients and how i think here's the setup with Jarvix: 1. dump your context once: projects, clients, writing style, how you make decisions.. it builds your personal model from your actual AI interactions 2. switch agents mid-task with zero re-briefing: Claude Code builds, Codex reviews, Gemini researches, all reading the same context 3. it carries what YOU choose across sessions.. never start a chat from zero again 4. when it's time to act, it pulls the right agents together as one team instead of five separate assistants the unlock isn't another agent. it's that your context finally travels agents without shared memory are five interns on their first day, forever. agents with it are a team that's worked with you for years not more agents. one shared context that's the right bet P.S. thanks to the Jarvix team for the early access

Ronin

15,071 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Most traders don’t fail because of strategy. They fail because they don’t see what they’re doing wrong. In real time. After being on a real trading floor and competing at a high level, one thing became clear: Awareness beats strategy. That’s why we built a full system: - A journal that tracks every trade automatically - An AI coach that analyzes your behavior - A community with live analysis and full transparency - And the ability to run our strategy as a bot Everything connected. Everything based on real data. If you’re serious about improving, you should be inside. Free Telegram group:

Most traders don’t fail because of strategy. They fail because they don’t see what they’re doing wrong. In real time. After being on a real trading floor and competing at a high level, one thing became clear: Awareness beats strategy. That’s why we built a full system: - A journal that tracks every trade automatically - An AI coach that analyzes your behavior - A community with live analysis and full transparency - And the ability to run our strategy as a bot Everything connected. Everything based on real data. If you’re serious about improving, you should be inside. Free Telegram group:

Merlijn The Trader

45,582 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

I used to spend hours generating fashion visuals one image at a time. And no matter how good they looked… something always felt off. Because real campaigns aren’t isolated shots. They’re systems. So I changed how I think. Instead of creating images, I built a workflow in FLORA that turns one outfit into a full campaign ,consistent, connected, intentional. This video is literally how my brain works now. Watch with sound 👀 FLORA © #FLORATechnique

I used to spend hours generating fashion visuals one image at a time. And no matter how good they looked… something always felt off. Because real campaigns aren’t isolated shots. They’re systems. So I changed how I think. Instead of creating images, I built a workflow in FLORA that turns one outfit into a full campaign ,consistent, connected, intentional. This video is literally how my brain works now. Watch with sound 👀 FLORA © #FLORATechnique

Zazzy

364,455 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"Everything I touch with my keyboard and mouse, I try to delegate to my bots." Here's my new episode with lauren and Peng Zheng, the eng and design leads for Grok Grok Bot, where they showed me the 14 bots they use for work and life, including: → A design bot that turns one keyframe into a full user flow → An eng lead bot that manages a team of eng bots → How to trust your bots with more of your work Some quotes from both: "I like to call it the Michelin kitchen…when you say software factory, it has this connotation of mass manufactured slop." "Sometimes I actually don't even look at the PR until after it's landed and then I'm like, 'Oh, okay. Yeah, that looks good.'" "I think it ultimately comes back to trust. First, watch your bot work and correct it. Turn what worked into a skill. Once it nails the task in one shot, make it a routine." 📌 Watch now: Thanks to our sponsors: Granola: AI meeting notes that don’t suck Riverside: All-in-one AI studio for podcasts and video

"Everything I touch with my keyboard and mouse, I try to delegate to my bots." Here's my new episode with lauren and Peng Zheng, the eng and design leads for Grok Grok Bot, where they showed me the 14 bots they use for work and life, including: → A design bot that turns one keyframe into a full user flow → An eng lead bot that manages a team of eng bots → How to trust your bots with more of your work Some quotes from both: "I like to call it the Michelin kitchen…when you say software factory, it has this connotation of mass manufactured slop." "Sometimes I actually don't even look at the PR until after it's landed and then I'm like, 'Oh, okay. Yeah, that looks good.'" "I think it ultimately comes back to trust. First, watch your bot work and correct it. Turn what worked into a skill. Once it nails the task in one shot, make it a routine." 📌 Watch now: Thanks to our sponsors: Granola: AI meeting notes that don’t suck Riverside: All-in-one AI studio for podcasts and video

Peter Yang

245,013 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

Robinhood already has the audience Ansem views Robinhood's existing user base as the key variable behind the chain's potential. "If they figure out a way for the Robinhood app users to be more active on the Robinhood chain..." "They have like the same amount of user base and they're also degens." "The Robinhood people made a ton of money on Dogecoin." Coinbase had a massive distribution advantage through its main app, yet Base required a separate effort to turn that audience into active onchain users. Robinhood starts with a user base already familiar with trading and speculation. Its retail audience also experienced one of crypto's biggest meme cycles through Dogecoin, creating an existing connection between the platform and onchain style trading. If Robinhood can convert that existing trading behavior into activity on its own chain, the network could gain a powerful distribution advantage from day one. The chain already has access to the audience. The real opportunity is turning that audience into onchain users. w/ Ansem 🐂🀄️

Robinhood already has the audience Ansem views Robinhood's existing user base as the key variable behind the chain's potential. "If they figure out a way for the Robinhood app users to be more active on the Robinhood chain..." "They have like the same amount of user base and they're also degens." "The Robinhood people made a ton of money on Dogecoin." Coinbase had a massive distribution advantage through its main app, yet Base required a separate effort to turn that audience into active onchain users. Robinhood starts with a user base already familiar with trading and speculation. Its retail audience also experienced one of crypto's biggest meme cycles through Dogecoin, creating an existing connection between the platform and onchain style trading. If Robinhood can convert that existing trading behavior into activity on its own chain, the network could gain a powerful distribution advantage from day one. The chain already has access to the audience. The real opportunity is turning that audience into onchain users. w/ Ansem 🐂🀄️

Kaiz 🐂🀄️

24,658 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat