Why a Reformed Baptist Cannot Believe in Baptismal Regeneration

Your position is illogical because Reformed Baptists usually affirm that the children of believers are part of the covenant community (like in Abrahamic typology), yet deny them the covenant sign—baptism—despite the Old Covenant applying that sign (circumcision) to infants. You can’t claim a more gracious covenant in Christ, then give fewer blessings to covenant children. In both covenants, the sign comes first, and faith matures within it. Should ancient Israel have imposed “believers circumcision?” The Church is the continuation, not the contradiction, of Israel.

I always respect a person that stands firm in their beliefs. But this why you also MUST reject the Nicene Creed. All the Christians of that time, including the authors, held to baptismal regeneration.

Reformed baptists are dumb

God's grace (Baptism) always comes before our faith. God is always the Baptizer and God is always present in that which He commands that we receive. In Matthew 28 Jesus commands us to go and make disciples. How? Baptize then teach them. God gives His Spirit in Baptism. When faith comes by hearing then Baptism is complete.

Edited 2024 prison documentary edited with baptism clips. This is highly informative. We need you to assist us in reaching them with Bible Love of Christ is the only message that draws Muslims to Jesus. @IvankaNews_ @elonmuskADO @elonmusk

He saved us through the washing and regeneration… This like many things is quite logical, and in being hyper-logical it errs from scripture. God is greater than our ideas of how he must function.

Because the Bible says Baptism Saves?

John Bunyan, in his book "Pilgrim's Progress," famously stated, "Believing is the consequence of the new birth,"

Reformed Baptist’s this is your moment to wake up and seek out Jesus Christ’s Catholic Church. He is here, eagerly waiting for you to join! Come board the ark of salvation!

Dumb

Unbiblical, Pope Keith.