Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Why are vaccine makers shielded from the civil justice system? No liability = no accountability. The system should prioritize patient safety over corporate protection. If you agree, sign the petition. Let’s bring accountability back to medicine. Tucker Carlson

21,452 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Vaccine Makers Admitted Vaccines Are Inherently Unsafe—So the Reagan Administration Gave Them Legal Immunity (Bret Weinstein on Joe Rogan) In a revelatory conversation on The Joe Rogan Experience, Bret Weinstein laid out the stunning backstory: Vaccine manufacturers admitted to the Reagan administration that their products were too risky to produce without legal protection. Their solution? A sweeping deal in 1986 that granted them total immunity from lawsuits. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act didn’t just create VAERS and a special court for injury claims—it removed all accountability. Weinstein and Rogan connected the dots: With no fear of lawsuits, pharmaceutical companies could expand the childhood vaccine schedule aggressively, injecting infants with an unprecedented number of doses from birth. The public was sold a story of safety and necessity, but the fine print told a different story: If vaccines were truly safe, why did manufacturers demand legal immunity? The answer, they argued, is profit. Without liability, there’s no incentive to prioritize safety over scale. And when mRNA technology arrived, it was marketed as a breakthrough under the trusted “vaccine” label—even though many rely on adjuvants that hyperactivate the immune system, potentially causing lifelong sensitivities. Yet, none of this is part of the public conversation. This isn’t about rejecting vaccines. It’s about facing an uncomfortable truth: A system built on legal immunity is a system that prioritizes corporate interests over public health. The Reagan administration’s deal didn’t just protect pharma—it set the stage for decades of unchecked expansion, where dissent is silenced and history is erased. The question we should all be asking: If vaccines are as safe as we’re told, why did they need legal protection in the first place?

Camus

41,165 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

1986: The year that fundamentally changed the landscape of childhood vaccines in America. A deep dive into the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Under Ronald Reagan, vaccine manufacturers made an unprecedented move. They told Congress they would stop producing vaccines altogether unless they were granted immunity from all liability. Parents were beginning to sue over children injured by vaccines, and the industry demanded protection. What does this "liability shield" mean in practice? Imagine a faulty car seat causes harm to a child. The manufacturer can be sued for damages. But if a child is injured or killed by a vaccine, that same legal recourse is gone. The manufacturer is untouchable. So, what replaced it? A system funded by a $0.75 tax on every vial of vaccine. This fund is tied to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System). Parents must file a VAERS report (a system with known, drastic underreporting) and then plead their case in a special "vaccine court" for a limited settlement. The result? The only consumer product in the U.S. with zero liability for its makers. Here’s the critical twist: Once the liability vanished in 1986, the childhood vaccine schedule began to explode. It jumped from a handful of shots to the current schedule of up to 72 doses by age 18. Simultaneously, the requirement for comprehensive safety studies for this new, crowded schedule evaporated. There are no studies demonstrating the safety of administering so many vaccines in combination, often as multi-dose shots. The tetanus shot is rarely just a tetanus shot. It's a package deal. The 1986 deal removed accountability and opened the floodgates. The question remains: Who truly bears the risk when a product's makers are immune from lawsuit?

Camus

37,323 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce