Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Why are we solving puzzles every time we need to do something online? These pesky automated tests for telling humans from bots online have become a familiar nuisance. Now bots can solve them faster than humans. So what’s the point? No more games. It’s time for real human verification.

World

503,724 subscribers

45,913 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Наука и технологии Образование

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля World Chain

World Chain1 год назад

Let’s skip the puzzles and get to the things that matter 🧩

Фото профиля NICE

NICE1 год назад

Stay competitive by balancing cutting-edge AI with automation tools. Forrester shows how.

Фото профиля BirdGames

BirdGames1 год назад

Nobody likes those puzzles. 🐦

Фото профиля Mehmet tırnova

Mehmet tırnova1 год назад

Come on, fly WLD and show the difference.

Фото профиля Hafsah 🌎

Hafsah 🌎1 год назад

Bots can do puzzles now, but only humans can get World ID. This is the upgrade.

Фото профиля Cyborg (✸,✸) CLONE 🐝

Cyborg (✸,✸) CLONE 🐝1 год назад

Pump $WLD 🚀 Your token -95% from ATH 🫠

Фото профиля Tonyz

Tonyz1 год назад

Scam Coin, i bought this shitcoin by 7$ for 7.000 usd, now i have just 900$, thanks..

Фото профиля ☘️

☘️1 год назад

💩💩💩💩💩💩

Фото профиля Danny

Danny1 год назад

We solved captchas, now we solve identity, Worldcoin’s just built different.

Фото профиля IDiot 🌐🖖🏻

IDiot 🌐🖖🏻1 год назад

Proof of ID-iot 🌐🖖🏻 $WLD $IDiot

Фото профиля Turbo

Turbo1 год назад

can't say how much I hate recaptchas😂 that bot sit have me feeling like I'm not even real

Похожие видео

ELON: EVEN OPEN-SOURCE AI IS GETTING BETTER HUMAN TESTS THAN HUMANS "We're getting to the point where even open-source AI can pass human captcha tests: 'Are you a human? Identify all the traffic lights in this picture.' You're like, okay, it's going to have no problem doing that. In fact, it'll do it better than a human and faster than a human. So, at the point at which it's better passing human tests than humans, then, what tests actually make sense?" Source: Interview with Rishi Sunak, November 2023

ELON: EVEN OPEN-SOURCE AI IS GETTING BETTER HUMAN TESTS THAN HUMANS "We're getting to the point where even open-source AI can pass human captcha tests: 'Are you a human? Identify all the traffic lights in this picture.' You're like, okay, it's going to have no problem doing that. In fact, it'll do it better than a human and faster than a human. So, at the point at which it's better passing human tests than humans, then, what tests actually make sense?" Source: Interview with Rishi Sunak, November 2023

Mario Nawfal

42,071 просмотров • 1 год назад

We're reaching an inflection point where AI generates more information than humans. Distinguishing agents from humans is a critical moat for trust online. Sam Altman explains why World built World ID with a goal of preserving the human layer of the internet.

We're reaching an inflection point where AI generates more information than humans. Distinguishing agents from humans is a critical moat for trust online. Sam Altman explains why World built World ID with a goal of preserving the human layer of the internet.

Pantera Capital

24,982 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

A viral video shows a massive Chinese “phone farm.” Hundreds of devices automate likes, comments, and follows to artificially push content viral. It’s real world proof of the Dead Internet Theory: A large share of online “activity” now comes from bots, not humans. Should we be concerned?

A viral video shows a massive Chinese “phone farm.” Hundreds of devices automate likes, comments, and follows to artificially push content viral. It’s real world proof of the Dead Internet Theory: A large share of online “activity” now comes from bots, not humans. Should we be concerned?

Sweep

17,781 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The Internet used to be people being weird at each other. Now it’s AI generated content, farmed engagement, and bots argue with other bots while real humans get mad at both. Half your replies aren’t even human. Half the “outrage” isn’t even real. We’re all just feeding a machine that’s learning to fake being us better than we fake being ourselves.

The Internet used to be people being weird at each other. Now it’s AI generated content, farmed engagement, and bots argue with other bots while real humans get mad at both. Half your replies aren’t even human. Half the “outrage” isn’t even real. We’re all just feeding a machine that’s learning to fake being us better than we fake being ourselves.

BigNino100

20,996 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"What do we need so many humans for?" Leading advisor to the WEF, Yuval Noah Harari, "predicts" that rapid advances in computing technology will "make humans redundant", creating a "massive class of useless people" who will need to be kept "happy" with "drugs and computer games". "Now, we see the creation of a new massive class of useless people. As computers become better and better in more and more fields, there is a distinct possibility that computers will outperform us in most tasks, and will make humans redundant. And then the big political and economic question of the 21st century will be, what do we need humans for? Or at least, what do we need so many humans for?" Source: Subscribe to us on Telegram: For more content like this, visit:

"What do we need so many humans for?" Leading advisor to the WEF, Yuval Noah Harari, "predicts" that rapid advances in computing technology will "make humans redundant", creating a "massive class of useless people" who will need to be kept "happy" with "drugs and computer games". "Now, we see the creation of a new massive class of useless people. As computers become better and better in more and more fields, there is a distinct possibility that computers will outperform us in most tasks, and will make humans redundant. And then the big political and economic question of the 21st century will be, what do we need humans for? Or at least, what do we need so many humans for?" Source: Subscribe to us on Telegram: For more content like this, visit:

Wide Awake Media

536,047 просмотров • 2 лет назад

"I sold my online cards to a real human who can now play with them" We spoke with on Parallel and what they're doing for trading card games

"I sold my online cards to a real human who can now play with them" We spoke with on Parallel and what they're doing for trading card games

Jake Lucky

49,304 просмотров • 1 год назад

The internet is now more bots than humans. 53% bots vs. 47% humans. 53%! More than half of all web traffic in 2025 was automated, not human. So the next time a stranger picks a fight with you on here, ask yourself one thing: how do you actually know that's a person? You don't. Neither do I. That's the part that should stop you. The numbers: bots hit 53% of internet traffic in 2025, humans down to 47%, the second year running we've been the minority. And 40% of ALL traffic is now malicious bots. Fake accounts, stolen logins, fraud, outrage generated on demand. Whoever can afford the server can rent a mob and aim it at a post, a narrative, a person. It's accelerating because of AI. Agent traffic grew 8,000% in a single year. These aren't clumsy spam accounts anymore. They argue. They quote-tweet. They pile on. They are built to be indistinguishable from the guy in your replies. For years people mocked "dead internet theory," the belief that most of the web is now bots and AI, not people. Tinfoil-hat stuff, they said. The 2025 numbers just proved the bones of it right. So argue if you want. Just don’t assume the person on the other end is real. Sources: Imperva/Thales 2026 Bad Bot Report, HUMAN Security, Cloudflare Radar.

The internet is now more bots than humans. 53% bots vs. 47% humans. 53%! More than half of all web traffic in 2025 was automated, not human. So the next time a stranger picks a fight with you on here, ask yourself one thing: how do you actually know that's a person? You don't. Neither do I. That's the part that should stop you. The numbers: bots hit 53% of internet traffic in 2025, humans down to 47%, the second year running we've been the minority. And 40% of ALL traffic is now malicious bots. Fake accounts, stolen logins, fraud, outrage generated on demand. Whoever can afford the server can rent a mob and aim it at a post, a narrative, a person. It's accelerating because of AI. Agent traffic grew 8,000% in a single year. These aren't clumsy spam accounts anymore. They argue. They quote-tweet. They pile on. They are built to be indistinguishable from the guy in your replies. For years people mocked "dead internet theory," the belief that most of the web is now bots and AI, not people. Tinfoil-hat stuff, they said. The 2025 numbers just proved the bones of it right. So argue if you want. Just don’t assume the person on the other end is real. Sources: Imperva/Thales 2026 Bad Bot Report, HUMAN Security, Cloudflare Radar.

Sovey

27,537 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Ken Liu Ken Liu on how modern explanations to questions like "why do we dream?", "why do I love this person?", "why are we here?" explain everything while explaining nothing at all. Science can explain mechanism. It can't explain meaning. Stories create meaning. Modern states ask citizens to die for them all the time - for the sake of a story. Humans will die for a story. It's the only thing humans have ever willingly died for.

Ken Liu Ken Liu on how modern explanations to questions like "why do we dream?", "why do I love this person?", "why are we here?" explain everything while explaining nothing at all. Science can explain mechanism. It can't explain meaning. Stories create meaning. Modern states ask citizens to die for them all the time - for the sake of a story. Humans will die for a story. It's the only thing humans have ever willingly died for.

Sabrina Halper

62,733 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

“We are the last generation that can do something about this.” Hear from Chris Rynning of AMYP & umanitek why online trust is eroding faster than regulation can respond — and why the only real solution is building safeguards into our shared digital fabric.

“We are the last generation that can do something about this.” Hear from Chris Rynning of AMYP & umanitek why online trust is eroding faster than regulation can respond — and why the only real solution is building safeguards into our shared digital fabric.

OriginTrail

11,456 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🧠David Friedberg explains the great hope of Artificial Superintelligence: Massive leverage on time to solve thousand-year problems "I don't think that humans are limited in our ability to solve problems." "I think we're limited in terms of time, and what digital intelligence gives us is leverage on time so that we can now tackle ever more complex tasks." "This idea of superintelligence is that it could give us immense leverage in solving that complex problem that we otherwise may be challenged to solve over decades, or hundreds of years, or think about one day solving a problem that would take humans thousands of years to solve." "So if I as a human said, 'I would like to harness fusion power similar to what the sun uses to make energy, and I wanna do that on Earth,' today, we're in, call it year 40 or 50 of a research cycle of humans trying to solve that particularly complex problem." "It's a scientific problem, it's a discovery problem, it's an engineering problem." "Functionally, leveraging to complexity is where this becomes super compelling for humans." "And it's why I think we can and should be highly optimistic about living very long lives, and traveling anywhere we want, and having abundance in food, and having abundance in resources, and having abundance in recouping our time to do the things we want to do instead of the things that we have to do today."

🧠David Friedberg explains the great hope of Artificial Superintelligence: Massive leverage on time to solve thousand-year problems "I don't think that humans are limited in our ability to solve problems." "I think we're limited in terms of time, and what digital intelligence gives us is leverage on time so that we can now tackle ever more complex tasks." "This idea of superintelligence is that it could give us immense leverage in solving that complex problem that we otherwise may be challenged to solve over decades, or hundreds of years, or think about one day solving a problem that would take humans thousands of years to solve." "So if I as a human said, 'I would like to harness fusion power similar to what the sun uses to make energy, and I wanna do that on Earth,' today, we're in, call it year 40 or 50 of a research cycle of humans trying to solve that particularly complex problem." "It's a scientific problem, it's a discovery problem, it's an engineering problem." "Functionally, leveraging to complexity is where this becomes super compelling for humans." "And it's why I think we can and should be highly optimistic about living very long lives, and traveling anywhere we want, and having abundance in food, and having abundance in resources, and having abundance in recouping our time to do the things we want to do instead of the things that we have to do today."

The All-In Podcast

53,187 просмотров • 1 год назад

We are the only company in the world offering a free, unlimited KYC plan. We build state-of-the-art AI Identity Verification solutions for both humans and businesses In the age of AI, deepfakes, and online identity theft, verifying identities online is more important than ever Join +250 companies already using Didit

We are the only company in the world offering a free, unlimited KYC plan. We build state-of-the-art AI Identity Verification solutions for both humans and businesses In the age of AI, deepfakes, and online identity theft, verifying identities online is more important than ever Join +250 companies already using Didit

Didit (YC W26)

4,593,067 просмотров • 1 год назад

Everyone's building trading bots. We built a way to observe them. We just dropped real-time bot tracking across Polymarket crypto markets. Watch it happen in real time coldvision PurpleThunderBicycleMountain's $300k/month strategy. Every trade. Every delta shift. Every accumulation pattern before market close. Bots didn't die after the fee nerf. They adapted. Now you can see exactly how. Track any wallet. Expose any strategy.

Everyone's building trading bots. We built a way to observe them. We just dropped real-time bot tracking across Polymarket crypto markets. Watch it happen in real time coldvision PurpleThunderBicycleMountain's $300k/month strategy. Every trade. Every delta shift. Every accumulation pattern before market close. Bots didn't die after the fee nerf. They adapted. Now you can see exactly how. Track any wallet. Expose any strategy.

gemchanger

132,388 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

In 13 years humans have destroyed an ecosystem the size of Mexico. We need to do better. It’s time for a new deal for nature. There is no planet B. #ActOnClimate #climateemergency #climateaction #climate #energy #forests #nature #GreenNewDeal #biodiversity #cop28

In 13 years humans have destroyed an ecosystem the size of Mexico. We need to do better. It’s time for a new deal for nature. There is no planet B. #ActOnClimate #climateemergency #climateaction #climate #energy #forests #nature #GreenNewDeal #biodiversity #cop28

Mike Hudema

15,262 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Dr. Ruxandra Teslo argues America's biotech problem isn't the science, it's how slowly we learn from humans: "This is going to be more and more of a bottleneck as science advances especially in oncology. It's not just that we don't have enough clinical trials and they are expensive. This has become worse and worse throughout the years." "The article is particularly focused on these phase one clinical trials. These are the trials where you first take a new drug into humans for the first time. The reason we're focusing on those, they are some of the most important trials because that's where you can actually start to learn and do iterative loops of learning in humans." "What you learn from that goes back into the science and you can engineer something better. We can see from China, they're very very good doing their phase one trials fast, that is very much responsible for propelling them ahead, almost ahead of the US in just a decade, despite the fact that their science is not as good." "We have a very good model for how to do them faster and better, which is Australia." Ruxandra Teslo 🧬 Adam Kroetsch IFP

Dr. Ruxandra Teslo argues America's biotech problem isn't the science, it's how slowly we learn from humans: "This is going to be more and more of a bottleneck as science advances especially in oncology. It's not just that we don't have enough clinical trials and they are expensive. This has become worse and worse throughout the years." "The article is particularly focused on these phase one clinical trials. These are the trials where you first take a new drug into humans for the first time. The reason we're focusing on those, they are some of the most important trials because that's where you can actually start to learn and do iterative loops of learning in humans." "What you learn from that goes back into the science and you can engineer something better. We can see from China, they're very very good doing their phase one trials fast, that is very much responsible for propelling them ahead, almost ahead of the US in just a decade, despite the fact that their science is not as good." "We have a very good model for how to do them faster and better, which is Australia." Ruxandra Teslo 🧬 Adam Kroetsch IFP

MTS

16,511 просмотров • 28 дней назад

.World CEO Alex Blania says 𝕏 will not be usable in “a matter of months—maximum two years” if 𝕏 doesn’t solve the bot problem: “It’s not about combatting bots. That’s a lost cause. Rather—every human on these platforms will need some version of a proof-of-human.” “I think we’ll want to have a lot of bots on social platforms, we just need to know they are in fact, bots.” “Am I currently talking to an AI system that’s trying to change my political view, or am I talking to a human that’s also in San Francisco—so me investing the time talking about SF city policy is actually time well spent?” “Once you have very capable agentic systems also be open source, things will go quite exponential. We’re still very early.”

.World CEO Alex Blania says 𝕏 will not be usable in “a matter of months—maximum two years” if 𝕏 doesn’t solve the bot problem: “It’s not about combatting bots. That’s a lost cause. Rather—every human on these platforms will need some version of a proof-of-human.” “I think we’ll want to have a lot of bots on social platforms, we just need to know they are in fact, bots.” “Am I currently talking to an AI system that’s trying to change my political view, or am I talking to a human that’s also in San Francisco—so me investing the time talking about SF city policy is actually time well spent?” “Once you have very capable agentic systems also be open source, things will go quite exponential. We’re still very early.”

sourcery

37,991 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

To everyone who hasn't tried Photon – WE ARE SORRY.. Sorry you were forced to use sub-par platforms Sorry no one had real-time charts for so F*KN LONG But we’re finally ready 0.69s faster than tg bots to execute a txn HYPERSPEED V2 on mobile *All trades + referrals earn points for [redacted]

To everyone who hasn't tried Photon – WE ARE SORRY.. Sorry you were forced to use sub-par platforms Sorry no one had real-time charts for so FKN LONG But we’re finally ready 0.69s faster than tg bots to execute a txn HYPERSPEED V2 on mobile All trades + referrals earn points for [redacted]

Photon

50,964 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: PIONEER OPENAI INVESTOR—AFTER AI WINS, WHAT ARE HUMANS FOR? When AI outperforms us in everything, from trading to diagnosis, what’s left for the human brain? Vinod Khosla: “Many of the things we strive for today will become irrelevant. But if AI serves human purpose, our need for meaning, status, and competition won’t go away.” Empathy can be coded. Emotions can be simulated. And soon, intelligence might no longer be our competitive edge. But in a future of abundance, the real question is: what are humans for? Watch the full interview—only on 𝕏.

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: PIONEER OPENAI INVESTOR—AFTER AI WINS, WHAT ARE HUMANS FOR? When AI outperforms us in everything, from trading to diagnosis, what’s left for the human brain? Vinod Khosla: “Many of the things we strive for today will become irrelevant. But if AI serves human purpose, our need for meaning, status, and competition won’t go away.” Empathy can be coded. Emotions can be simulated. And soon, intelligence might no longer be our competitive edge. But in a future of abundance, the real question is: what are humans for? Watch the full interview—only on 𝕏.

Mario Nawfal

65,481 просмотров • 1 год назад