正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨 WHY DID SOME PEOPLE QUESTION EVERYTHING — WHILE OTHERS QUESTIONED NOTHING? Several years after the pandemic, I asked Karen Kingston a question that still fascinates me. Why did some people immediately question what they were being told, while others — including extremely intelligent and highly educated people —...

14,740 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

35 条评论

John Olooney 的头像
John Olooney2 个月前

Clearly whatever psychological techniques or chemtrail poisons or mRNA gene therapy vaccines they are rolling out are literally mentally neutering people. It seems very effective as well

Susan F Langlois 的头像
Susan F Langlois2 个月前

I do not think it was amnesia. Some people are just more skeptical than the majority. You do not need to be well educated or intelligent to question things. I worked with many colleagues who were well educated and intelligent but would not challenge the mainstream. I spent my entire 45 year career as a regulatory professional in the biotech industry and was always skeptical and critical. Part of my duties was to challenge everything and my negative personality worked well in that environment. I am pessimistic by nature and overcome that character flaw by overcoming obstacles. When fast-tracking a new technology was announced by Trump and supported by Fauci in early 2020, I was extremely skeptical. Others believed that fast-tracking was possible without sacrificing safety. They also trusted the FDA and other regulatory agencies to protect the public. My regulatory background would not allow anyone to convince me that it was possible to fast-track the mRNA/spike protein "vaccines" and I immediately began to investigate their development history and failures. I knew that the LNPs were also new and untested. Unless well educated and intelligent individuals were skeptical and pessimistic, and did not posses my expertise and experience, they would not investigate to the depths that I did. In addition, mainstream and social media quickly attacked people like me and removed us from the discussion. Only the skeptics in society listened to "us experts" on platforms that were ignored by the majority.

Vaxtard 的头像
Vaxtard2 个月前

@jathorpmfm Vaxtards who stand for NOTHING will fall for anything

Durwin Lloyd, ND (ret) 的头像
Durwin Lloyd, ND (ret)2 个月前

The question is not IQ. Ferguson is right about that. Kingston calling it “amnesia” is close and still too kind. What you watched was people protecting a belonging. Two orientations. One starts with the neighbor — including the child, the worker, the body that does not belong to the state. That orientation flinches when a government says you may not work, may not worship, may not see a dying parent, and must take an untested product or lose the roof. The flinch is not a conspiracy theory. It is the conscience noticing that the person has been turned into an instrument. The other orientation starts with the system. The system is the tribe: party, profession, platform, the good people who “follow the science.” Once that is the source of self, a fact that condemns the tribe is not a fact. It is an attack. So the mind does what a liar does even when the mouth is sincere: it will not let the evidence land. That is the technical meaning you want. A lie is a refusal of what is there. Some refuse it knowing. More refuse it because admitting it would cost the room, the job, the marriage, the sense that they were the kind ones. Intelligence makes the refusal more elegant. It does not make it rarer. Jesus put the fork in one sentence: if you are not for me, you are against me. And the other: if the light in you is darkness, how great is that darkness. He was not talking about test scores. He was talking about a will that has already chosen its master. A captured will can recite papers and still not see a lab, a mandate, or a child. Why some saw it on day one. The pathogen-from-a-lab file was never “crazy.” The chimeric work, the Wuhan Institute, the DEFUSE-shaped coincidence, the private emails that treated a laboratory incident as live while the podium called it a conspiracy — that is a record. The totalitarian indicators were not subtle: speech boards, firing, closed churches, papers that would not publish the dissent. People whose first loyalty was the person in front of them smelled the use. People whose first loyalty was the official story smelled only “misinformation,” because that word had been issued as a shield. Why the rest could not be reached. You cannot argue a man out of a church he did not enter with an argument. You are asking him to orphan himself. During the Biden years, the American republic—constitution and all—administered that orphaning as policy: isolate the unclean, mark the job, mark the feed, call the neighbor a vector. That is not a disagreement about R-naught. That is a government teaching citizens to treat one another as contagion. Once a soul has practiced that, more evidence is just more threat. So it is spiritual, and it is also administrative. The system is not a neutral machine that sometimes errs. It rewards the person who uses the neighbor and punishes the person who does not. The ones who questioned nothing were not all stupid. Many were already employed by that reward. The ones who questioned everything were not all prophets. Many simply had not sold the part that still recognizes a human being when the state says “essential.” The darkness is great when the light you trust is the press release. The way out is not a better citation. It is refusing to use the person in front of you — and refusing the story that requires it.

Jim Ferguson 的头像
Jim Ferguson2 个月前

That's a very interesting way of framing it, Durwin. Perhaps the question was never primarily intelligence, but identity — what happens when accepting evidence carries a personal, professional or social cost. “Intelligence makes the refusal more elegant. It does not make it rarer.” That's a line worth thinking about.

Dave Sempire 的头像
Dave Sempire2 个月前

ALL I can say is that -> ALL of us that DID NOT TAKE the KILLER SHOTS; ARE STILL ALIVE and WELL!!! The Genocide PROMOTERS MUST BE MADE AN EXAMPLE!!!

Wu Tang is 4 the children 的头像
Wu Tang is 4 the children2 个月前

♥️.

Jim_Slip 的头像
Jim_Slip2 个月前

Maybe, Mother Nature sows a “Cynical gene” into a proportion of the population to ensure the whole of humanity doesn’t jump off a cliff, all at the same time. She must ensure some will dissent or question. Thats not to say, those that question will always be right, they might be wrong & all die. Mother Nature cares not. The preservation of the species is tantamount.

Chief Quesobutt 的头像
Chief Quesobutt2 个月前

I called it days before the lockdown. The elites are going after Trump's economy.

Rebel 的头像
Rebel2 个月前

If could ignore politics/tribalism and you had a basic understanding of immunology and science, alarms went off immediately. But you didn’t even need that basic understanding of science … it was amiss, people should have sensed it everywhere.

Lalaland888 的头像
Lalaland8882 个月前

If you have anything (and any truth like seeing through the covid lies), it is a gift from God. John 3:27 (KJV) “John answered and said, A man can receive nothing, except it be given him from heaven.”

David 的头像
David2 个月前

without getting philosophical (which the intelligent brigade would), it's sheer laziness of being

jannina 的头像
jannina2 个月前

I think people were conditioned through the flu shot and didn't question it and because they were terrified. Fear porn was big. They also trusted government. They also lack critical thinking and making decisions for themselves.

Carl Stauder 的头像
Carl Stauder2 个月前

lack of critical thinking skills intentionally life we live designed that wau by the powers to be.

AdamMK 的头像
AdamMK2 个月前

I call it fluoride in every step of the consumption process and people no longer have basic common sense 😔

Exposethedemons 的头像
Exposethedemons2 个月前

Fear of reprisal. Fear of being CAST OUT Rush Subdivisions

Tilly Barrington 的头像
Tilly Barrington2 个月前

Yes Why?!?! I never once considered it…I was aware of Event 201 and that actual Eugenicists (gates/fauci) were pushing it. Why was I aware and others were not? Surrounded by imbeciles…the highly educated are the worst.

Ted-2-Truth 的头像
Ted-2-Truth2 个月前

Being educated is not the same as being smart or understanding critical thinking and reality.This is also clearly visible with Ukraine — the same people who bought the (obvious to me) “safe and effective” lie also believe the “unprovoked” lie. Educated fools is a real thing.

Wu Tang is 4 the children 的头像
Wu Tang is 4 the children2 个月前

♥️.

Tilly Barrington 的头像
Tilly Barrington2 个月前

Those of us that can easily see patterns and question things did not fall for it.

Linny 的头像
Linny2 个月前

Courses in logic would help. I’m astounded by how many people cannot think logically. I was taught and it made a huge difference for me. It made me start to question everything.

jannina 的头像
jannina2 个月前

Yeah I find it interesting too. I know since I was young, I was just that way. Had my own opinion, did not go along with the crowd.

Anja🇷🇺🕊 的头像
Anja🇷🇺🕊2 个月前

And fear.

Anne777 的头像
Anne7772 个月前

End times. People are brain washed and many just cowards and stupid. That is my take on it. It was very clear how evil they turned.

Corpfascist1913 的头像
Corpfascist19132 个月前

I questioned everything about COVID and the gene therapy experimental shot, because of the corporate coup de tat and the "regulatory capture" of public agencies. There are no checks in place, most notably the Vaccine Act blanket immunity. Profit over people.

Ted-2-Truth 的头像
Ted-2-Truth2 个月前

What amazed me most was people lining up for the shot, watching others get carried out right after the injection — and still not leaving. They even brought their kids.

ChezSez 的头像
ChezSez2 个月前

It’s not amnesia. I believe it’s because most people are not open minded or even the slightest bit curious. In addition they believe the government, paid commentators and pharmaceuticals have their best interests at heart. Consult your doctor sounds ridiculous now days.

CovidConfusion2 的头像
CovidConfusion22 个月前

Reading science fiction--Frank Herbert. "Fear is the mind-killer." I recognized panic-mongering in 2020.

GunkyFadgets 的头像
GunkyFadgets2 个月前

because Milgram

L A Larson 的头像
L A Larson2 个月前

"Milgram Experiment", look it up, most people are wired to believe and follow authority figures, about 35% will question and say "no".

DDover61 的头像
DDover612 个月前

I believe most people sell out, justify, minimize, just to stay safe in their own lives. And they are good with that behavior. I think we saw that on steroids. I believe it's spiritual and mental illness.

Craig A. McDonald 的头像
Craig A. McDonald2 个月前

degrees mean shiit most people are just fckn retarded - good at one thing big deal - useless at the rest of life.

Giant-Herbs 的头像
Giant-Herbs2 个月前

It’s easy: when everything coming out through government & media is backwards to standard understandings of virology, it’s easy to smell the psyop. For example, it was concluded long before 2020 that lock downs were not effective. Another, research showed that after sars-cov-1

SarahElizabeth 的头像
SarahElizabeth2 个月前

The vax was mandated in order to maintain employment - not much of a choice.

Tanja Willems 的头像
Tanja Willems2 个月前

#CriticalThinking #Gutfeeling

相关视频

THE WOMAN WHO KEPT ASKING IF HE LOVED HER IS THE SAME ONE HE FINALLY TOLD YES. She stood in front of him and refused to let the conversation end. She told him to stop pretending he felt nothing. She brought up the new girlfriend she believed he had and asked why he kept pushing her away. He denied having a girlfriend and told her to stop. She pressed further. She reminded him she had been like a second mother to him. He answered that she was not his mother. She still asked the question again and again: Do you love me? Answer me. Say it. After repeated pressure, he said yes. He admitted he was in love with her. She did not accept his earlier attempts to shut the conversation down. She stayed on the question until he answered. He moved from denial and deflection to a direct admission once she refused to leave the topic. The admission came only after she kept demanding it out loud. WHEN HE FINALLY SAID YES, IT SHOWED THAT SOME PEOPLE ONLY ADMIT WHAT THEY FEEL AFTER BEING FORCED TO CONFRONT THE QUESTION DIRECTLY. People can push someone away, deny a relationship, and still hold feelings they have not named. She kept asking because his actions did not match his words. He only confirmed the feeling after she refused to accept the silence or the deflection. Many people avoid stating what they feel until the other person creates a moment where avoidance is no longer possible. The repeated question did not create the feeling. It only removed the space he had been using to avoid saying it. Before accepting a relationship that begins with denial, it is worth noticing whether the person can speak clearly without being cornered. An admission that only appears after sustained pressure may reveal the feeling, but it also reveals how reluctant the person was to own it on their own. I TURN EVERYDAY EXPERIENCES INTO REAL-LIFE LESSONS, UNCOVERING HIDDEN TRUTHS, HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, AND LIFE'S DEEPEST LESSONS THAT WE CAN ALL LEARN FROM.

DESY CFC

103,975 次观看 • 6 天前

One aspect of Karen Read’s interview on the Rotten Mango podcast that deserves real appreciation is how open, honest, and raw she is. And this isn’t new because in every interview she’s given, she has shown up the same way. She has nothing to hide... because she did not kill John O’Keefe. Stephanie asked Karen a deeply personal question: if there were objects she could choose to speak for her, what would they be? Karen’s answer was simple and heartbreaking: rosary beads, specifically ones made from yellow roses taken from John’s casket. Karen was denied the opportunity to properly grieve or attend John’s services after the Norfolk County DA’s Office and Massachusetts State Police charged her with his murder. A standard condition of that charge is a stay-away order from the victim’s family, which was imposed on her. Her ability to mourn the man she loved was taken from her at the very moment she needed it most. We hadn’t heard this detail before, and it’s quietly comforting to know that even though Karen couldn’t physically be there to say goodbye, she still carries a small, sacred piece of John with her. I also find it incredibly telling that, out of all the things she could have named, her mind immediately went to something rooted in spirituality and her connection to John. No matter what anyone from the “other side” claims, this answer speaks volumes. Karen cared deeply for John and she still does. And she won’t stop fighting until John gets justice. 💙

BoozeyBeauty

24,608 次观看 • 10 个月前