Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🤔 Why do we still rely on the final layer of an LLM, when different layers encode different information? 🤔 In our new work, “Improving LLM Final Representations with Inter-Layer Geometry” (ICLR 2026 Workshop on Geometry-grounded Representation Learning and Generative Modeling) we show that actually, LLMs do not have...

16,703 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

8 Comments

Maya Bechler-Speicher's profile picture
Maya Bechler-Speicher5 months ago

The Cayley-Encoder builds on two previous works work: (1) “Graph Neural Networks Use Graphs When They Shouldn’t,” where we showed that GNNs tend to overfit graph structures and that regular graphs are robust to this overfitting; and (2) “Cayley-Graph Propagation,” with @PetarV_93 and @sonjj74 , where we showed how to leverage Cayley Graphs to break computational bottlenecks in GNNs. Together, these make Cayley Graphs a natural candidate for sparse, efficient, and robust communication between layer representations. Congrats to Tom Ulanovski and Eyal Blyachman for leading this great work!

Maya Bechler-Speicher's profile picture
Maya Bechler-Speicher5 months ago

The core idea of the Cayley-Encoder is to let all layers communicate through an efficient sparse symmetric structure that is robust to structural overfitting. We do so by introducing a Cayley graph of the Special Linear Group over the LLM’s layer representations and learning over it with a small Graph Neural Network. This enables efficient information flow across the full depth of the model, without overfitting to arbitrary layer-interaction patterns or biasing the representation toward any single layer.

Maya Bechler-Speicher's profile picture
Maya Bechler-Speicher5 months ago

Improving LLM Final Representations with Inter-Layer Geometry:

Alexa | Indie hacker's profile picture
Alexa | Indie hacker5 months ago

super solid work. 🤝 just gave you a follow :)

Matin Urdu's profile picture
Matin Urdu5 months ago

Really cool! This seems to be very similar to the idea of jumping knowledge networks for GNNs (but done in a clever way).

Prithvi Jadwani | AI SEO | GEO | REDDIT SEO | GMB's profile picture
Prithvi Jadwani | AI SEO | GEO | REDDIT SEO | GMB5 months ago

What about the computational overhead of training and maintaining this multi-layer representation?

That AI Guy's profile picture
That AI Guy5 months ago

Your welcome.

Timur Klimov's profile picture
Timur Klimov5 months ago

Metacognition is the solution for consciousness of any kind I like how your works complement each other

Related Videos

geoffrey hinton spent 40 years and won a nobel prize in 2024 proving that neural networks learn geometry, not rules. people who understood that made $10M building on top of it. people who didn't - are still prompting. what nobody explained is what that geometry actually looks like inside a running LLM - 32 layers, 1T parameters, 200-500 dimensions of pure structured thought. until now. a September 2026 technical note mapped the full internal representation space of LLMs - and what's happening inside is not what anyone expected. here's what's actually happening: your text enters the model as tokens. "The" becomes ID 101. "market" becomes 427. "complex" becomes 981. immediately each token gets mapped to a dense vector e(t) ∈ ℝ^d - a point in hundreds of dimensions. the model never sees words again. from this moment it only sees geometry. then transformer layers reshape that geometry. h_l = TransformerLayer(h_{l-1}). at layer 1 - syntax. at layer 8 - semantics. at layer 24 - task-specific abstract reasoning. the same token changes meaning as it moves through 32 layers. "market" near "crash" occupies a completely different region than "market" near "opportunity." cosine similarity makes this measurable. sim(a,b) = h_a · h_b / ||h_a|| ||h_b||. "market" and "markets" sit at 0.91 similarity. "trading" at 0.87. "stocks" at 0.85. "economy" at 0.79. these aren't definitions. these are distances in geometric space - and the model navigates between them to reason. the representation space isn't flat. it forms manifolds. arithmetic knowledge lives on one manifold. logical reasoning on another. factual knowledge on a third. each with distinct geometric properties. this is why GPT-6 can switch between writing code and explaining physics without retraining - different tasks, different manifolds, same underlying space. spectral analysis of the representation covariance shows rapid eigenvalue decay - which means the model compresses all of human language and reasoning into a low-dimensional geometric structure. 200-500 dimensions out of billions of parameters. the rest is redundancy. hinton saw this coming in 1986 with backpropagation. it took 40 years and $100B in compute to see it clearly. the models that will define the next decade aren't the ones with more parameters. they're the ones whose geometry is better understood and better controlled. Bookmark & watch today. learn the geometry or build blindly on top of something you don't understand.

Deliriumm

21,652 views • 1 month ago

Jensen Huang told a room of global investors that AI is not one industry. It is five stacked on top of each other. Most people are investing in layer four and ignoring layers one through three entirely. He called it the five-layer cake. Layer one is energy. Jensen said this is the single greatest opportunity for the energy industry in a hundred years. The first time in a century that the grid in most countries can actually attract serious capital. Nuclear, solar, wind, hydrogen, it does not matter what form. If it produces energy, it gets funded. Siemens, GE Vernova, Mitsubishi. That is why they are all doing so well right now. Layer two is chips, computers, networking, and silicon photonics. Everything that processes the intelligence. Layer three is infrastructure. Land, power, buildings, data center operations. Every single one in short supply today. Layer four is the model layer. OpenAI, Anthropic. The layer everyone talks about. Layer five is applications. Every startup applying AI to financial services, legal, healthcare, logistics, transportation. Last year alone, a hundred billion dollars of venture capital went into this layer. The single largest VC year in the history of humanity. Then he said the number that stopped me cold. We are putting one trillion dollars into this five-layer cake this year. That sounds enormous. Jensen thinks the AI industry will eventually run at twenty trillion dollars per year. We are one trillion in of a twenty trillion dollar per year ecosystem. Most people watching AI are staring at layer four. Jensen was describing layers one through five as a single compounding system where every layer feeds the one above it. The people who understand that will invest differently than the people who do not.

Ihtesham Ali

99,614 views • 4 months ago

FIVE LAYERS OF AGENT ENGINEERING, EACH ONE WRAPS THE ONE BELOW IT. IF YOU SKIP LAYER 2, YOUR LAYER 5 WILL LOOK BROKEN WHEN IT IS ACTUALLY JUST STANDING ON NOTHING. for weeks i debated harness vs loop vs graph like they were competing choices. then a stack diagram made the shape obvious. they are not choices. they are floors. 01 | prompt engineering. the message. unit of work: one input. inputs are role, instructions, examples, format. output is a single raw response. 02 | context engineering. the memory. unit of work: what stays in the window. a curator selects, compresses, and drops from query, docs, memory, prior turns, and tool outputs before the prompt runs. 03 | harness engineering. the machine. unit of work: the machine itself. gather (context + prompt) → LLM → tools or sub-agents → verifier → final response. the article calls this the operating environment. 04 | loop engineering. the system. unit of work: the run. goal + success criteria + max iterations + budget + completion check wrap around one harness pass. failed pass appends results to context and retries. 05 | graph engineering. the topology. unit of work: the graph run. goal + nodes + edges + state schema. graph routes to agent nodes, tool nodes, or human approval. a reviewer node with a different model and fresh context checks the final answer. the wrapping is the whole point. layer 5 assumes layer 4 works. layer 4 assumes layer 3 works. skip layer 2 and layer 3's verifier keeps failing without a clear reason. this is why swapping the model is a one-day project and swapping the stack is a quarter. the model is the commodity. the five layers around it are the engineering. full three-layer breakdown of the top of the stack (harness, loop, graph) in the post below.

kocer

31,198 views • 2 months ago