Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Why does PBD just automatically believe Candace about not only the alleged French assassination plot but also about Candace formally reaching out to the White House? There are multiple claims being made that Candace has presented zero evidence of—that there was a French government hit put out on her... and also that she passed it along to the proper channels in the White House and also that she never heard back. One or all or none of these things could be true. We have no idea. But see, what Candace wanted was for the White House to put out a statement, and because they didn’t do that, she’s telling all of us that she never heard back from them. We don’t know she didn’t. We also don’t know that she passed along any of this the proper way or even at all (initially she said she just reached out to someone over text). We also don’t know that anyone from the French government ever even reached out to her. We also don’t know that evidence of an assassination plot even exists. I’m genuinely confused why PBD both now and during the debate just believes Candace because “trust me, bro.” Literally zero evidence of anything was ever submitted to the public. So who are you get upset at Tulsi of all people?show more

Natalie Jean Beisner

120,039 subscribers

12,905 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

“I made that statement, and the White House hasn’t disputed it!” “The silence on things that are just so easy to respond to. Like if someone messaged me and said, ‘hey Candace, we heard that back when you were working in New York City that you had keys to a white house and you were ushering in models,’ I’d be like, ‘I have no idea what you’re talking about. This is not true.’ Erika’s not doing that!” One thing Candace hates more than anything else—even more than people laughing at or making jokes about her—is when big-name people ignore her. She CANNOT STAND that Erika is currently ignoring her and won’t respond to questions any longer, just like she has never been able to stand that the White House didn’t make a statement on her allegations that the Macrons took a hit out on her life as well as the fact that Trump hasn’t said anything about the Macrons suing her She can’t stand it. She tries to paint their silence as evidence of their guilt (because that’s just how dishonest and manipulative she is), but you can tell it’s eating her up inside by the way she references it over and over and over again for weeks and months now.

“I made that statement, and the White House hasn’t disputed it!” “The silence on things that are just so easy to respond to. Like if someone messaged me and said, ‘hey Candace, we heard that back when you were working in New York City that you had keys to a white house and you were ushering in models,’ I’d be like, ‘I have no idea what you’re talking about. This is not true.’ Erika’s not doing that!” One thing Candace hates more than anything else—even more than people laughing at or making jokes about her—is when big-name people ignore her. She CANNOT STAND that Erika is currently ignoring her and won’t respond to questions any longer, just like she has never been able to stand that the White House didn’t make a statement on her allegations that the Macrons took a hit out on her life as well as the fact that Trump hasn’t said anything about the Macrons suing her She can’t stand it. She tries to paint their silence as evidence of their guilt (because that’s just how dishonest and manipulative she is), but you can tell it’s eating her up inside by the way she references it over and over and over again for weeks and months now.

Natalie Jean Beisner

29,746 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Candace Owens claims French Paratroopers that she calls “The Maroon Shirt Boys” killed Charlie Kirk and tried to assassinate her. Her proof? Some random photo from Google of French soldiers wearing maroon berets. She also claims she sent info about this to the White House and the FBI. But I guess she forgot that on a past episode she already admitted she never actually did that she just sent someone (maybe Joe Kent?) a text message that was left on read.

Candace Owens claims French Paratroopers that she calls “The Maroon Shirt Boys” killed Charlie Kirk and tried to assassinate her. Her proof? Some random photo from Google of French soldiers wearing maroon berets. She also claims she sent info about this to the White House and the FBI. But I guess she forgot that on a past episode she already admitted she never actually did that she just sent someone (maybe Joe Kent?) a text message that was left on read.

Cinema Shogun

75,563 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Candace Owens broke her golden rule. “If you’re going to be a liar you better have a good memory.” It appears that Candace and her pea brained cult already forgot about this. Back in January Candace talked to TPUSA donors that confirmed Charlie said he would want Erika to take over. Candace said the story checked out. She even said the donor was a very good person and she understood why they wouldn’t want to be identified. So what happened???? This was around the time of her Fort Huachuca conspiracy. So Candace already had plenty of content and fake conspiracies to keep her fans occupied for a while. But now… Her content has dried up. Her fake conspiracies have all been debunked. So she’s resorted to trying to spin a conspiracy out of this despite the fact that she already debunked herself months ago. She has zero respect for her fans and she views them as gullible idiots just like we do. So she’s doesn’t think twice about contradicting herself or etc. because her fans don’t know any better.

Candace Owens broke her golden rule. “If you’re going to be a liar you better have a good memory.” It appears that Candace and her pea brained cult already forgot about this. Back in January Candace talked to TPUSA donors that confirmed Charlie said he would want Erika to take over. Candace said the story checked out. She even said the donor was a very good person and she understood why they wouldn’t want to be identified. So what happened???? This was around the time of her Fort Huachuca conspiracy. So Candace already had plenty of content and fake conspiracies to keep her fans occupied for a while. But now… Her content has dried up. Her fake conspiracies have all been debunked. So she’s resorted to trying to spin a conspiracy out of this despite the fact that she already debunked herself months ago. She has zero respect for her fans and she views them as gullible idiots just like we do. So she’s doesn’t think twice about contradicting herself or etc. because her fans don’t know any better.

Cinema Shogun

75,774 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Watch Candace contradict herself from one month to the next. 👇👇👇 In January, Candace confirmed that a TPUSA donor who’s a “very good person” and was at the Aspen retreat said that Charlie did actually say he’d want Erika to take over in the event of something happening. Candace said the story “checked out” and that she had her answer. Now, she’s telling us that another donor has said actually no Charlie said nothing of the sort. Obviously two separate donors can say two separate things; it happens. The problem is that Candace is pretending she never said what she said in January. She seems to have forgotten all about this very good person donor from January who’s story checked out. She doesn’t seem at all concerned that this donor apparently lied to her, and she doesn’t explain to her audience—an audience she claims to be working with to “crowdsource” an “investigation”—why she believes one donor over the other. Both (or all) donors remain unnamed, so we can’t check for ourselves why we’re getting conflicting stories from them and from Candace. Another problem? Candace is now saying that Charlie saying this in Aspen never passed the sniff test for her—but if that’s the case, why did she hide that from us in January? Why didn’t she clue her audience into that? The audience she again claims to be working alongside? Why did she lead us to believe the story checked out if it “didn’t pass the sniff test”? Candace is making it up as she goes along. Her story shifts from month to month—not in the typical way for a fluid investigation but rather in ways wherein she all-out contradicts herself from one month to the next and never actually explains why. It’s as if previous months are simply forgotten by her—and she’s hoping you’ll forget too.

Watch Candace contradict herself from one month to the next. 👇👇👇 In January, Candace confirmed that a TPUSA donor who’s a “very good person” and was at the Aspen retreat said that Charlie did actually say he’d want Erika to take over in the event of something happening. Candace said the story “checked out” and that she had her answer. Now, she’s telling us that another donor has said actually no Charlie said nothing of the sort. Obviously two separate donors can say two separate things; it happens. The problem is that Candace is pretending she never said what she said in January. She seems to have forgotten all about this very good person donor from January who’s story checked out. She doesn’t seem at all concerned that this donor apparently lied to her, and she doesn’t explain to her audience—an audience she claims to be working with to “crowdsource” an “investigation”—why she believes one donor over the other. Both (or all) donors remain unnamed, so we can’t check for ourselves why we’re getting conflicting stories from them and from Candace. Another problem? Candace is now saying that Charlie saying this in Aspen never passed the sniff test for her—but if that’s the case, why did she hide that from us in January? Why didn’t she clue her audience into that? The audience she again claims to be working alongside? Why did she lead us to believe the story checked out if it “didn’t pass the sniff test”? Candace is making it up as she goes along. Her story shifts from month to month—not in the typical way for a fluid investigation but rather in ways wherein she all-out contradicts herself from one month to the next and never actually explains why. It’s as if previous months are simply forgotten by her—and she’s hoping you’ll forget too.

Natalie Jean Beisner

81,992 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

“We publicly challenged the ‘Candace is making everything up’ crowd to prove it—press the White House for a response…A week later, this is the official White House response—crickets.” A few things here: Again, it’s on Candace to prove her claims are correct—not on any of us to disprove them. She didn’t even provide any proof of the alleged assassination plot; no, instead, as is her usual M.O., she merely said, ‘I have the proof’ and invited the White House to ask for it if they wanted it. So how exactly is the “Candace is making everything up” crowd supposed to disprove a claim that she herself hasn’t proven or even provided any evidence for? Pressing the White House for a response does nothing to “disprove” Candace’s (unproven) claim, because the White House could come out today and say, “we investigated and found no credible threats on Candace’s life from the French government,” and that wouldn’t “disprove” her. It would just be more fodder for her and her low-IQ crowd to say, “see, we told you this administration was corrupted”—just like they’re currently doing with the administration’s heretofore silence on this matter. In reality, this woman is just salty that everyone who matters ignored her. She’ll continue to spin it as, “look see, it means we’re onto something, and they were in on it,” but that’s the reality.

“We publicly challenged the ‘Candace is making everything up’ crowd to prove it—press the White House for a response…A week later, this is the official White House response—crickets.” A few things here: Again, it’s on Candace to prove her claims are correct—not on any of us to disprove them. She didn’t even provide any proof of the alleged assassination plot; no, instead, as is her usual M.O., she merely said, ‘I have the proof’ and invited the White House to ask for it if they wanted it. So how exactly is the “Candace is making everything up” crowd supposed to disprove a claim that she herself hasn’t proven or even provided any evidence for? Pressing the White House for a response does nothing to “disprove” Candace’s (unproven) claim, because the White House could come out today and say, “we investigated and found no credible threats on Candace’s life from the French government,” and that wouldn’t “disprove” her. It would just be more fodder for her and her low-IQ crowd to say, “see, we told you this administration was corrupted”—just like they’re currently doing with the administration’s heretofore silence on this matter. In reality, this woman is just salty that everyone who matters ignored her. She’ll continue to spin it as, “look see, it means we’re onto something, and they were in on it,” but that’s the reality.

Natalie Jean Beisner

56,239 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Brandon Tatum (after saying Candace has "convinced" him, multiple times, that there was an assassination threat on her and that the "proof" warranted the US government needed to look into after talking with Candace Owens) says that he hasn't seen the evidence directly, but believes Candace. He told Candace to send him the evidence on an encrypted communications app. Basically, he said he believes her, believes that she has credible evidence, said there is "proof," said that the US government needs to investigate, but wants to clarify he didn't say he saw the evidence, even though Candace convinced him it's all true. Hope this helps.

Brandon Tatum (after saying Candace has "convinced" him, multiple times, that there was an assassination threat on her and that the "proof" warranted the US government needed to look into after talking with Candace Owens) says that he hasn't seen the evidence directly, but believes Candace. He told Candace to send him the evidence on an encrypted communications app. Basically, he said he believes her, believes that she has credible evidence, said there is "proof," said that the US government needs to investigate, but wants to clarify he didn't say he saw the evidence, even though Candace convinced him it's all true. Hope this helps.

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

35,553 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

I have to share this clip. I found it so funny. Her real colors came out. I think this maybe one of the reasons why Charlie didn’t want Candace at campus tours anymore. She didn’t like the students. 😂 She says why would he be excited to go back to UVU because it’s just - “A bunch of teenagers mostly over coddled by their parents, shouting at you” “She wouldn’t be on the edge of her seat, itching to go back to UVU”. She literally hates anyone that’s not Catholic, Orthodox, or Russian at this point. Does she talk nicely about anyone? Candace maybe he was excited and it was going to be the best because you weren’t going to be there. I just found that she seems to have not liked the students at these events interesting. Backs up the woman in the posts that is all over X saying Candace was rude and wouldn’t talk to them if she didn’t have to.

I have to share this clip. I found it so funny. Her real colors came out. I think this maybe one of the reasons why Charlie didn’t want Candace at campus tours anymore. She didn’t like the students. 😂 She says why would he be excited to go back to UVU because it’s just - “A bunch of teenagers mostly over coddled by their parents, shouting at you” “She wouldn’t be on the edge of her seat, itching to go back to UVU”. She literally hates anyone that’s not Catholic, Orthodox, or Russian at this point. Does she talk nicely about anyone? Candace maybe he was excited and it was going to be the best because you weren’t going to be there. I just found that she seems to have not liked the students at these events interesting. Backs up the woman in the posts that is all over X saying Candace was rude and wouldn’t talk to them if she didn’t have to.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

29,520 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨Watch Candace Owens connect dots that don’t actually connect in order to force a non-existent link between Erika Kirk and the Rothschilds. Candace claims it’s “plausible” that Erika Kirk was introduced to real estate because she was close to a family with the last name Rothstein ➜ She then claims that if this Rothstein family is related to Arnold Rothstein, who fixed the White Sox game in 1919, that Rothstein was connected to the European banking dynasty, the Rothschilds ➜ This claim appears to rest on the fact that Arnold Rothstein’s mother had the surname Rothschild - a common Ashkenazi Jewish name - but there appears to be no evidence that it refers to the same Rothschild family. She then finishes by saying: “I don’t know if that’s true. But it sure would be interesting to find that out.” She also asserts that she’s not saying the Rothsteins Erika Kirk knows did anything wrong. It’s incredible that we have Tucker Carlson asserting that Israel is evil because of “Amalek” or blood guilt, while Candace Owens is suggesting Erika Kirk is suspicious simply because she was close to a Jewish family with the same surname as people Candace claims - without evidence - were related to the Rothschilds. Meanwhile, there is still no evidence that anyone has actually done anything wrong; the implication rests entirely on the possibility that they might be related to someone. It’s also incredible that anyone considers Candace Owens throwing completely random things at the wall and hoping something sticks for her audience to be journalism.

🚨Watch Candace Owens connect dots that don’t actually connect in order to force a non-existent link between Erika Kirk and the Rothschilds. Candace claims it’s “plausible” that Erika Kirk was introduced to real estate because she was close to a family with the last name Rothstein ➜ She then claims that if this Rothstein family is related to Arnold Rothstein, who fixed the White Sox game in 1919, that Rothstein was connected to the European banking dynasty, the Rothschilds ➜ This claim appears to rest on the fact that Arnold Rothstein’s mother had the surname Rothschild - a common Ashkenazi Jewish name - but there appears to be no evidence that it refers to the same Rothschild family. She then finishes by saying: “I don’t know if that’s true. But it sure would be interesting to find that out.” She also asserts that she’s not saying the Rothsteins Erika Kirk knows did anything wrong. It’s incredible that we have Tucker Carlson asserting that Israel is evil because of “Amalek” or blood guilt, while Candace Owens is suggesting Erika Kirk is suspicious simply because she was close to a Jewish family with the same surname as people Candace claims - without evidence - were related to the Rothschilds. Meanwhile, there is still no evidence that anyone has actually done anything wrong; the implication rests entirely on the possibility that they might be related to someone. It’s also incredible that anyone considers Candace Owens throwing completely random things at the wall and hoping something sticks for her audience to be journalism.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

23,852 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Watch Candace Owens lies to her audience and rewrites history... In December, during her sit-down with Erika Kirk, Candace said they didn’t have access to additional evidence - and that authorities “could very well” have more evidence they simply couldn’t share with the victim’s friends and family. Today, she told her audience: “When I sat down with Erika, I explained to you that her lawyer told me that right now we don’t have any evidence. Right now (Dec 2025), the state is going to go out there and find the evidence.” Not only does she gaslight her audience about what she previously said, she also expects them to believe Tyler Robinson was arrested and charged with no evidence - which is completely implausible and idiotic.

Watch Candace Owens lies to her audience and rewrites history... In December, during her sit-down with Erika Kirk, Candace said they didn’t have access to additional evidence - and that authorities “could very well” have more evidence they simply couldn’t share with the victim’s friends and family. Today, she told her audience: “When I sat down with Erika, I explained to you that her lawyer told me that right now we don’t have any evidence. Right now (Dec 2025), the state is going to go out there and find the evidence.” Not only does she gaslight her audience about what she previously said, she also expects them to believe Tyler Robinson was arrested and charged with no evidence - which is completely implausible and idiotic.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

44,495 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Oh damn she named donors. I don’t think that’s going to fly well. That is a lawsuit. First it’s not public information and second you can’t give out personal information on people like this. Oh and she is insinuating a lawsuit on TPUsa but there’s nothing she can sue them for. They don’t have to give her information. This is all a show on her part. It was discussed at a dinner break out session for the big donors. Now she’s telling her followers to not attack the donors. Oh Candace you know what you just did. You just put them in a cross hairs of your Candace crazies. They will be hounded and slandered from all sides now. Now she’s back to the DC FOIA and states the video is fake. The Dept of War hasn’t answered her. Dept of War says they aren’t answering it. They said it was too much of a burden to look for it. They are just messing with her now. It’s pissing her off. Now she’s going off on TPUsa not standing behind Massie. And not standing up over the Iran war. Charlie wasn’t assassinated by the left. She insisting it was the US government. It’s deep state. And it’s over Israel. Let’s all keep in mind that Candace has no evidence of any of this. She’s just rambling her same old stuff. Erika isn’t acting like a grieving widow. She’s in on her husbands death. She is evil. Erika really needs to sue her and take Candace for all she has. Erika is just being used to cover it all up. This is stupid. Now we are going into celebrity gossip. She really has nothing to talk about anymore. But the video. So now we are going to gossip. Her viewers aren’t happy about it. Many are saying they are watching her for celebrity gossip. She’s upset Ivanka bought an island and is making fun of her about it. I think Candace is so jealous. You can see it on her face. Look at her face. It’s so funny. So now she’s blaming Ivanka for Gaza now. And now saying Ivanka is friends with the Rothschilds and has too much money. And hurt kids. And blah blah blah. I remember when Candace said Ivanka was the most beautiful woman she met and so sweet too. I’ll have to find that article. And her husband genocided and the Palestines were killed for a vacation project. Russia good. I don’t know why but hey we had to throw it in there. Russia is really nice guys. We need to visit. PR crisis mode for US weekly. And Erika is putting in ad to slander Candace. I thought about this today. This is epic. Want to know why. Because 99.9% of the US doesn’t watch Candace. So Candace can’t fight it on her podcast because these people don’t watch her. Candace says she doesn’t call anyone. If you want to talk to her you have to call her assistant. She doesn’t answer calls. Ok noted don’t call Candace. You can tell it’s irritating her a lot. Ok we are back to celebrity gossip. Adriana Grande is using Ethan Slader and took him away from his wife and baby. I didn’t even know about this but I don’t follow any of this. For some reason these seems personal for Candace. Candace is your husband stepping out on you? Not only is he gay, an alcoholic but he’s cheating on you? You seem personally invested. Again her audience is complaining they don’t want to hear about it. And that’s all we got. She never talks nice about anyone. Ever notice that? Her audience seemed to tonight. A few called it out. She’s losing her audience.

Oh damn she named donors. I don’t think that’s going to fly well. That is a lawsuit. First it’s not public information and second you can’t give out personal information on people like this. Oh and she is insinuating a lawsuit on TPUsa but there’s nothing she can sue them for. They don’t have to give her information. This is all a show on her part. It was discussed at a dinner break out session for the big donors. Now she’s telling her followers to not attack the donors. Oh Candace you know what you just did. You just put them in a cross hairs of your Candace crazies. They will be hounded and slandered from all sides now. Now she’s back to the DC FOIA and states the video is fake. The Dept of War hasn’t answered her. Dept of War says they aren’t answering it. They said it was too much of a burden to look for it. They are just messing with her now. It’s pissing her off. Now she’s going off on TPUsa not standing behind Massie. And not standing up over the Iran war. Charlie wasn’t assassinated by the left. She insisting it was the US government. It’s deep state. And it’s over Israel. Let’s all keep in mind that Candace has no evidence of any of this. She’s just rambling her same old stuff. Erika isn’t acting like a grieving widow. She’s in on her husbands death. She is evil. Erika really needs to sue her and take Candace for all she has. Erika is just being used to cover it all up. This is stupid. Now we are going into celebrity gossip. She really has nothing to talk about anymore. But the video. So now we are going to gossip. Her viewers aren’t happy about it. Many are saying they are watching her for celebrity gossip. She’s upset Ivanka bought an island and is making fun of her about it. I think Candace is so jealous. You can see it on her face. Look at her face. It’s so funny. So now she’s blaming Ivanka for Gaza now. And now saying Ivanka is friends with the Rothschilds and has too much money. And hurt kids. And blah blah blah. I remember when Candace said Ivanka was the most beautiful woman she met and so sweet too. I’ll have to find that article. And her husband genocided and the Palestines were killed for a vacation project. Russia good. I don’t know why but hey we had to throw it in there. Russia is really nice guys. We need to visit. PR crisis mode for US weekly. And Erika is putting in ad to slander Candace. I thought about this today. This is epic. Want to know why. Because 99.9% of the US doesn’t watch Candace. So Candace can’t fight it on her podcast because these people don’t watch her. Candace says she doesn’t call anyone. If you want to talk to her you have to call her assistant. She doesn’t answer calls. Ok noted don’t call Candace. You can tell it’s irritating her a lot. Ok we are back to celebrity gossip. Adriana Grande is using Ethan Slader and took him away from his wife and baby. I didn’t even know about this but I don’t follow any of this. For some reason these seems personal for Candace. Candace is your husband stepping out on you? Not only is he gay, an alcoholic but he’s cheating on you? You seem personally invested. Again her audience is complaining they don’t want to hear about it. And that’s all we got. She never talks nice about anyone. Ever notice that? Her audience seemed to tonight. A few called it out. She’s losing her audience.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

20,845 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

WOW 🤦‍♂️ Candace Owens ADMITS Erika Kirk sent her EVIDENCE to show she wasn’t at Fort Huachuca. But it wasn’t GOOD ENOUGH for Candace. Nothing is ever GOOD ENOUGH for Candace because she doesn’t want the TRUTH she just wants to keep her FAKE little stories going. Now she’s claiming she NEVER ASKED for alibis while saying that the alibis provided weren’t GOOD ENOUGH for her. And even COMPLAINS about alibis being sent to other people and not her. She does make a very INTERESTING POINT here though. She says her fans will TRUST what she says without her having to show any evidence. THAT’S SO TRUE !!! And it lets us know that Candace is VERY AWARE of the power she has over her cult. She knows she can tell them ANYTHING and they’ll believe it. So now instead of moving on from her COMPLETELY DEBUNKED Fort Huachuca story she’s telling her cult that there’s still something there. She’s still HARASSING Erika despite her providing proof she wasn’t at Fort Huachuca. And as per usual her REASONING for all of this is absolutely ridiculous. She doesn’t know know but she knows.

WOW 🤦‍♂️ Candace Owens ADMITS Erika Kirk sent her EVIDENCE to show she wasn’t at Fort Huachuca. But it wasn’t GOOD ENOUGH for Candace. Nothing is ever GOOD ENOUGH for Candace because she doesn’t want the TRUTH she just wants to keep her FAKE little stories going. Now she’s claiming she NEVER ASKED for alibis while saying that the alibis provided weren’t GOOD ENOUGH for her. And even COMPLAINS about alibis being sent to other people and not her. She does make a very INTERESTING POINT here though. She says her fans will TRUST what she says without her having to show any evidence. THAT’S SO TRUE !!! And it lets us know that Candace is VERY AWARE of the power she has over her cult. She knows she can tell them ANYTHING and they’ll believe it. So now instead of moving on from her COMPLETELY DEBUNKED Fort Huachuca story she’s telling her cult that there’s still something there. She’s still HARASSING Erika despite her providing proof she wasn’t at Fort Huachuca. And as per usual her REASONING for all of this is absolutely ridiculous. She doesn’t know know but she knows.

Cinema Shogun

14,362 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Candace Owens bases many of her fake conspiracies on “suspicious” behavior. But if you ever take a closer look and actually examine that “suspicious” behavior you will quickly learn that the “suspicious” behavior in question is really just people not wanting to deal with Candace because they don’t like her and know she’s untrustworthy and has her own agendas. IT’S ACTUALLY HILARIOUS ONCE YOU NOTICE. 😂🤣😂🤣😂 Her latest conspiracy about Terryl Farnsworth is a perfect example of that. No there’s no grand conspiracy behind the SD card. No there’s no grand conspiracy behind why Terryl didn’t want to give her the footage. Terryl made excuses because he most likely knows that she would use it for clout or for other agendas. He knows she likes to stir up bullsh*t and didn’t want any parts of it. It’s really that simple. His only mistake is not being more straight forward about it. It’s also important to note that Candace isn’t entitled to any of this no matter how much she pretends she is. And the real reason Candace is mad is because Terryl sent the footage to actual investigators before her. And it’s funny that she’s bragging about her intuition and vibes here. Because I’m sure Candace caught on to the vibe that these people don’t want to deal with her and her nonsense a very long time ago. So she knows she’s not going to get exactly what she wants or is looking for when she reaches out to them. But she still does so purposely so she can use the responses or lack there of to back her stupid theories.

Candace Owens bases many of her fake conspiracies on “suspicious” behavior. But if you ever take a closer look and actually examine that “suspicious” behavior you will quickly learn that the “suspicious” behavior in question is really just people not wanting to deal with Candace because they don’t like her and know she’s untrustworthy and has her own agendas. IT’S ACTUALLY HILARIOUS ONCE YOU NOTICE. 😂🤣😂🤣😂 Her latest conspiracy about Terryl Farnsworth is a perfect example of that. No there’s no grand conspiracy behind the SD card. No there’s no grand conspiracy behind why Terryl didn’t want to give her the footage. Terryl made excuses because he most likely knows that she would use it for clout or for other agendas. He knows she likes to stir up bullsh*t and didn’t want any parts of it. It’s really that simple. His only mistake is not being more straight forward about it. It’s also important to note that Candace isn’t entitled to any of this no matter how much she pretends she is. And the real reason Candace is mad is because Terryl sent the footage to actual investigators before her. And it’s funny that she’s bragging about her intuition and vibes here. Because I’m sure Candace caught on to the vibe that these people don’t want to deal with her and her nonsense a very long time ago. So she knows she’s not going to get exactly what she wants or is looking for when she reaches out to them. But she still does so purposely so she can use the responses or lack there of to back her stupid theories.

Cinema Shogun

27,272 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

🔥👀 WOW. “Do you have any evidence that Erika Kirk or TPUSA participated in the murder of Charlie Kirk?” - Andrew Wilson “I never said that” - Candace Owens “So you don’t believe they did” - Wilson “I’ve never said that statement … so I’m not gonna get you to ask me personal question about things I never said” - Candace A video is then played where Candace says France & Israel are involved. Candace is getting upset that Andrew Wilson is asking for positive evidence of her claims on PBD Podcast during the debate.

🔥👀 WOW. “Do you have any evidence that Erika Kirk or TPUSA participated in the murder of Charlie Kirk?” - Andrew Wilson “I never said that” - Candace Owens “So you don’t believe they did” - Wilson “I’ve never said that statement … so I’m not gonna get you to ask me personal question about things I never said” - Candace A video is then played where Candace says France & Israel are involved. Candace is getting upset that Andrew Wilson is asking for positive evidence of her claims on PBD Podcast during the debate.

Johnny St.Pete

21,032 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

Candace Owens claims she felt an intense sense of DANGER before Charlie was killed. She says the feeling was so overwhelming that she pulled her kids out of school. Candace’s kids aren’t even old enough to be in school. She also pretends that she homeschools them. So that’s a lie. She also claimed that she hired extra security before Charlie was killed because of this sense of danger. That’s also a lie. She cried that Tim Pool was trying to get her killed when he exposed that her security was just one fat guy. After Charlie was killed she made up a fake French assassination plot claimed they were out to get her and she set up a donation fund on her website for her fans to pay for “extra security” to protect her from make believe assassins. AND TO ADD THE CHERRY 🍒 ON TOP… She also claimed that this sense of danger caused her to take her podcast off air before Charlie was killed. YOU GUESSED IT !!! That’s another lie. She literally posted an episode ranting about Brigitte Macron and MK Ultra the day before Charlie was killed. It’s all still up on her YouTube channel and anyone can see for themselves. So there’s three easily debunked lies from Candace Owens in under 27 seconds.

Candace Owens claims she felt an intense sense of DANGER before Charlie was killed. She says the feeling was so overwhelming that she pulled her kids out of school. Candace’s kids aren’t even old enough to be in school. She also pretends that she homeschools them. So that’s a lie. She also claimed that she hired extra security before Charlie was killed because of this sense of danger. That’s also a lie. She cried that Tim Pool was trying to get her killed when he exposed that her security was just one fat guy. After Charlie was killed she made up a fake French assassination plot claimed they were out to get her and she set up a donation fund on her website for her fans to pay for “extra security” to protect her from make believe assassins. AND TO ADD THE CHERRY 🍒 ON TOP… She also claimed that this sense of danger caused her to take her podcast off air before Charlie was killed. YOU GUESSED IT !!! That’s another lie. She literally posted an episode ranting about Brigitte Macron and MK Ultra the day before Charlie was killed. It’s all still up on her YouTube channel and anyone can see for themselves. So there’s three easily debunked lies from Candace Owens in under 27 seconds.

Cinema Shogun

70,254 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Andrew went to TPUSA and asked for evidence to dispute all the BS Candace and the other minions have been saying for months. He said they were happy to give it to him. He also says he will give everyone evidence that on Friday all this will be dropped. - Erika was not at Ft H. He says the entire Ft H conspiracy will be blown out of the water. Mitch and Stew Peters are screwed. But also if the evidence shows this the Harpole case is a in a great position. - Where Erika was when Charlie died - Charlie wanted Erika to take over - The text - That Candace was after TPUSA almost as soon as Charlie died. I bet it’s texts and emails from Candace wanting to go back to TPUSA and being told no but I could be wrong. And more….. That what he shows will shut down all the conspiracies. This is what Candace is so mad about. She knew when that text was read that Andrew had more than just that. We shall see. I hope it’s iron clad.

Andrew went to TPUSA and asked for evidence to dispute all the BS Candace and the other minions have been saying for months. He said they were happy to give it to him. He also says he will give everyone evidence that on Friday all this will be dropped. - Erika was not at Ft H. He says the entire Ft H conspiracy will be blown out of the water. Mitch and Stew Peters are screwed. But also if the evidence shows this the Harpole case is a in a great position. - Where Erika was when Charlie died - Charlie wanted Erika to take over - The text - That Candace was after TPUSA almost as soon as Charlie died. I bet it’s texts and emails from Candace wanting to go back to TPUSA and being told no but I could be wrong. And more….. That what he shows will shut down all the conspiracies. This is what Candace is so mad about. She knew when that text was read that Andrew had more than just that. We shall see. I hope it’s iron clad.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

36,934 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

LIAR 🤥 Alert 🚨 Candace Owens continues to EXPOSE her own lies for us‼️ I seem to vividly remember Candace Owens telling her fans that she knew FOR A FACT that Charlie Kirk had a secret Catholic funeral and was buried in a Catholic cemetery. That was her conspiracy of the week months ago. BUT NOW WE KNOW SHE TOTALLY LIED ABOUT THAT. How do we know? Because Candace herself is now questioning if/saying Charlie was cremated. Which lets us know that she was full of 💩 when she said she knew Charlie was secretly buried in a Catholic cemetery. When one of Candace’s conspiracies goes stale she just replaces it with another. Candace literally has no shame in her game at all and has no problem blatantly lying and changing up her stories even if they directly contradict her past claims. Because she knows her fans will clap along like seals and won’t question a thing. It’s never been about the truth it’s always been about dragging this on for as long as possible to get maximum monetization out of Charlie’s death.

LIAR 🤥 Alert 🚨 Candace Owens continues to EXPOSE her own lies for us‼️ I seem to vividly remember Candace Owens telling her fans that she knew FOR A FACT that Charlie Kirk had a secret Catholic funeral and was buried in a Catholic cemetery. That was her conspiracy of the week months ago. BUT NOW WE KNOW SHE TOTALLY LIED ABOUT THAT. How do we know? Because Candace herself is now questioning if/saying Charlie was cremated. Which lets us know that she was full of 💩 when she said she knew Charlie was secretly buried in a Catholic cemetery. When one of Candace’s conspiracies goes stale she just replaces it with another. Candace literally has no shame in her game at all and has no problem blatantly lying and changing up her stories even if they directly contradict her past claims. Because she knows her fans will clap along like seals and won’t question a thing. It’s never been about the truth it’s always been about dragging this on for as long as possible to get maximum monetization out of Charlie’s death.

Cinema Shogun

26,281 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Candace Owens little fan club is all over the internet claiming that Candace never spoke out against cameras being allowed in the courtroom for the Tyler Robinson trial. This is a common tactic of theirs. Deny Deny Deny. Even if she’s on video saying it. Candace also always tries to speak in a way where she heavily implies things or says things indirectly so she can outright deny directly saying things when she gets called out for it in the future. But to put the argument to rest… Here’s Candace saying the media a.k.a the people with cameras shouldn’t be allowed in the courtroom because all they do is lie. And because people will make excuses for that. Here’s Candace on camera laying out a case for why there should be a delay and there shouldn’t be cameras because she claims they just want a “show trial” and not real justice.

Candace Owens little fan club is all over the internet claiming that Candace never spoke out against cameras being allowed in the courtroom for the Tyler Robinson trial. This is a common tactic of theirs. Deny Deny Deny. Even if she’s on video saying it. Candace also always tries to speak in a way where she heavily implies things or says things indirectly so she can outright deny directly saying things when she gets called out for it in the future. But to put the argument to rest… Here’s Candace saying the media a.k.a the people with cameras shouldn’t be allowed in the courtroom because all they do is lie. And because people will make excuses for that. Here’s Candace on camera laying out a case for why there should be a delay and there shouldn’t be cameras because she claims they just want a “show trial” and not real justice.

Cinema Shogun

24,076 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This entire exchange is essentially thus: Andrew: “What’s your evidence for the exploding mic theory?” Candace: “Rob O’Neill says, and he’s cooler than you.” The funny thing about this is that Candace started jumping onboard the exploding train before Rob did. She also repeatedly claims that her critics are comparable to the people saying “trust the experts” during Covid, but here and over and over again she appeals to authority as if that’s evidence of her outrageous claims. We don’t need the expert class, Candace. We have eyes and ears and grey matter. Just like Candace says that for every person in the audience who turned and look backward that day in the direction of the shot, there’s one who didn’t (not true, by the way), for every “expert” like Rob, there’s an expert who says the exploding mic theory is ludicrous.

This entire exchange is essentially thus: Andrew: “What’s your evidence for the exploding mic theory?” Candace: “Rob O’Neill says, and he’s cooler than you.” The funny thing about this is that Candace started jumping onboard the exploding train before Rob did. She also repeatedly claims that her critics are comparable to the people saying “trust the experts” during Covid, but here and over and over again she appeals to authority as if that’s evidence of her outrageous claims. We don’t need the expert class, Candace. We have eyes and ears and grey matter. Just like Candace says that for every person in the audience who turned and look backward that day in the direction of the shot, there’s one who didn’t (not true, by the way), for every “expert” like Rob, there’s an expert who says the exploding mic theory is ludicrous.

Natalie Jean Beisner

93,999 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

“I can’t speak on whether he was close to converting…I do think from what I’ve been told that he was planning on signing up and starting that process [of becoming Catholic]. But I did not personally have that conversation with him…” A few things: Candace says she can’t speak on whether Charlie was close to converting to Catholicism—and then immediately goes on to speak about how she thinks he was close to converting. 🙄 Additionally, the first time she ever spoke about this (September 15th, see the 2nd clip below) she suggested he was close to converting. Because it’s Candace, she didn’t come right out and say, but she said he “was on the verge of changing some of his beliefs” and then went on to speak about how he was praying the rosary and attending mass. She also referenced him “taking that last step.” All of those things paired together imply (again without outright saying) he was close to converting. She also said in the same episode he was “too smart to be Protestant.” Mind you, this was FIVE DAYS after Charlie had been murdered. Charlie’s parents are Protestant. His wife was raised Catholic but is now Protestant. And whether you think he was close to converting or not, Charlie died Protestant. Her saying that FIVE DAYS after his murder was callous and tone deaf. This is how Candace makes things always and all about herself. This was in fact the first thing that clued me in that something was seriously wrong, after previously being her fan. Today, she doubled down on her implications that Charlie was close to converting (even though again she’d just said she couldn’t speak on that). She said she and Charlie were having conversations about it, but the only evidence she’s ever presented is a single vague text allegedly from him and dated February 2024. The problem is that Charlie went on to reiterate he was evangelical and all of his issues with the Catholic faith this year, in the months leading up to his death. Indeed, one of the final things he said on this earth the day he died was that he was evangelical. So even if he sent that text to Candace in February of 2024, it’s clear he wasn’t that convicted and that she read more into it than was actually meant. Because again, this year, in 2025, he was reaffirming his evangelical faith. Lastly, Candace admitted today that she heard from someone else that Charlie was becoming Catholic (likely Bishop Joseph Brennan). But if she and Charlie were already having conversations about the possibility of him converting (as she claims they were), why wouldn’t he tell Candace directly? Especially when again they allegedly were already having conversations about it? Please listen to what this woman actually says from one month, one week, one day to the next. And parse it out. Hear what she’s saying and also what she’s not saying. Determine what she’s implying. Compare herself to herself. And see if she makes sense to you, if she provides clarity to you, if she provides evidence. Not just on the subject of Charlie converting but on all subjects pertaining to this “investigation.” Finally, this has NOTHING to do with who murdered Charlie and why. I’m tired of talking about it, but she keeps being dishonest about what she actually said, again a mere five days after his murder.

“I can’t speak on whether he was close to converting…I do think from what I’ve been told that he was planning on signing up and starting that process [of becoming Catholic]. But I did not personally have that conversation with him…” A few things: Candace says she can’t speak on whether Charlie was close to converting to Catholicism—and then immediately goes on to speak about how she thinks he was close to converting. 🙄 Additionally, the first time she ever spoke about this (September 15th, see the 2nd clip below) she suggested he was close to converting. Because it’s Candace, she didn’t come right out and say, but she said he “was on the verge of changing some of his beliefs” and then went on to speak about how he was praying the rosary and attending mass. She also referenced him “taking that last step.” All of those things paired together imply (again without outright saying) he was close to converting. She also said in the same episode he was “too smart to be Protestant.” Mind you, this was FIVE DAYS after Charlie had been murdered. Charlie’s parents are Protestant. His wife was raised Catholic but is now Protestant. And whether you think he was close to converting or not, Charlie died Protestant. Her saying that FIVE DAYS after his murder was callous and tone deaf. This is how Candace makes things always and all about herself. This was in fact the first thing that clued me in that something was seriously wrong, after previously being her fan. Today, she doubled down on her implications that Charlie was close to converting (even though again she’d just said she couldn’t speak on that). She said she and Charlie were having conversations about it, but the only evidence she’s ever presented is a single vague text allegedly from him and dated February 2024. The problem is that Charlie went on to reiterate he was evangelical and all of his issues with the Catholic faith this year, in the months leading up to his death. Indeed, one of the final things he said on this earth the day he died was that he was evangelical. So even if he sent that text to Candace in February of 2024, it’s clear he wasn’t that convicted and that she read more into it than was actually meant. Because again, this year, in 2025, he was reaffirming his evangelical faith. Lastly, Candace admitted today that she heard from someone else that Charlie was becoming Catholic (likely Bishop Joseph Brennan). But if she and Charlie were already having conversations about the possibility of him converting (as she claims they were), why wouldn’t he tell Candace directly? Especially when again they allegedly were already having conversations about it? Please listen to what this woman actually says from one month, one week, one day to the next. And parse it out. Hear what she’s saying and also what she’s not saying. Determine what she’s implying. Compare herself to herself. And see if she makes sense to you, if she provides clarity to you, if she provides evidence. Not just on the subject of Charlie converting but on all subjects pertaining to this “investigation.” Finally, this has NOTHING to do with who murdered Charlie and why. I’m tired of talking about it, but she keeps being dishonest about what she actually said, again a mere five days after his murder.

Natalie Jean Beisner

42,513 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Candace Owens has dehumanized Erika Kirk for months now. She’s literally told people repeatedly that Erika isn’t even human. She has some of her psycho fans convinced that Erika is a robot hybrid android controlled by Israel. No I’m not over exaggerating she has literally said these things to an audience of millions of unstable people. So sadly it’s no surprise that Candace and others have inspired lunatics online to try and kill Erika. Candace has even dedicated entire episodes to claiming that Erika is lying about the threats being made against her. Now we have one sicko behind bars for threatening to blow up TPUSA events. But there are many more of these sick freaks out there and Candace is inspiring more and more of them with every episode she puts out.

Candace Owens has dehumanized Erika Kirk for months now. She’s literally told people repeatedly that Erika isn’t even human. She has some of her psycho fans convinced that Erika is a robot hybrid android controlled by Israel. No I’m not over exaggerating she has literally said these things to an audience of millions of unstable people. So sadly it’s no surprise that Candace and others have inspired lunatics online to try and kill Erika. Candace has even dedicated entire episodes to claiming that Erika is lying about the threats being made against her. Now we have one sicko behind bars for threatening to blow up TPUSA events. But there are many more of these sick freaks out there and Candace is inspiring more and more of them with every episode she puts out.

Cinema Shogun

52,168 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce