Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Why does the turbine stop responding to stronger flow in the high-speed case when your natural instinct would expect it to keep speeding up? At that point, the blades are mostly interacting with the disturbed wake they created themselves. So, torque from different regions start cancelling and flipping in... show more

Mathelirium

34,536 subscribers

15,365 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

•042426• new interview of #zhanglinghe with Movie News for "The Answer is Earth" documentary 💬🌱 ZLH🚀: this is a small souvenir they gave me when I visited the wind turbine manufacturing plant. 👤: I know you really like these kinds of things. ZLH🚀: yes, this is the motor of the wind turbine, located at the highest point of the turbine shaft. these are the blades. they look small now, but in reality, when I went to the wind turbine manufacturing plant, it was about 80 meters long. really huge. and the proportions might not be accurate. when we stood below it, it was incredibly impressive. it works like this: the wind comes from this direction and drives the blades to rotate. then the motor converts that kinetic energy into electrical energy. there are cables below that can directly transmit the electricity to a substation, where it's stepped up or down in voltage, and then sent to places on land where the electricity is used. that's how a wind turbine works. 👤: it's a very meaningful souvenir. ZLH🚀: yes. 👤: where are you planning to put it? ZLH🚀: before I brought this with me, I usually keep it next to my computer.

•042426• new interview of #zhanglinghe with Movie News for "The Answer is Earth" documentary 💬🌱 ZLH🚀: this is a small souvenir they gave me when I visited the wind turbine manufacturing plant. 👤: I know you really like these kinds of things. ZLH🚀: yes, this is the motor of the wind turbine, located at the highest point of the turbine shaft. these are the blades. they look small now, but in reality, when I went to the wind turbine manufacturing plant, it was about 80 meters long. really huge. and the proportions might not be accurate. when we stood below it, it was incredibly impressive. it works like this: the wind comes from this direction and drives the blades to rotate. then the motor converts that kinetic energy into electrical energy. there are cables below that can directly transmit the electricity to a substation, where it's stepped up or down in voltage, and then sent to places on land where the electricity is used. that's how a wind turbine works. 👤: it's a very meaningful souvenir. ZLH🚀: yes. 👤: where are you planning to put it? ZLH🚀: before I brought this with me, I usually keep it next to my computer.

张凌赫的小核桃𖹭

14,289 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

CNN’s Abby Phillip: [The Department of Energy said today] that they're ending wind and solar subsidies, taking more energy out of the system, not putting it into the system. So, yes, I mean, I'm not sure there's any problem solving happening.” Ben Ferguson: "If you look at windmills and you look at them in Texas and other states, they have been a disaster compared to what they were supposed to produce. They're not producing. So why would you invest in a BAD INVESTMENT. By the way, they’re doing this in Europe as well, the data is now there. The solar and wind isn't gonna fix our grid, and then if you're saying any more solar panels or wind turbines, we're totally screwed. We will have to go to 78 degrees.” Abby Phillip: “Here's the thing. I think that there is an argument to be made for all of the above energy, right?” Ben Ferguson: “But if it's ineffective and it doesn't work, why do it?”

CNN’s Abby Phillip: [The Department of Energy said today] that they're ending wind and solar subsidies, taking more energy out of the system, not putting it into the system. So, yes, I mean, I'm not sure there's any problem solving happening.” Ben Ferguson: "If you look at windmills and you look at them in Texas and other states, they have been a disaster compared to what they were supposed to produce. They're not producing. So why would you invest in a BAD INVESTMENT. By the way, they’re doing this in Europe as well, the data is now there. The solar and wind isn't gonna fix our grid, and then if you're saying any more solar panels or wind turbines, we're totally screwed. We will have to go to 78 degrees.” Abby Phillip: “Here's the thing. I think that there is an argument to be made for all of the above energy, right?” Ben Ferguson: “But if it's ineffective and it doesn't work, why do it?”

RedWave Press

56,003 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Wind turbines are getting bigger, more efficient, and are delivering higher output. That sounds impressive, but it isn't compared to other sources. A single nuclear plant, for example, produces around 1,750 megawatts. To match that, you need roughly 150 large turbines. Wind uses over 100X more land than nuclear for the same output. And turbines, of course, only produce power when the wind is blowing. Nuclear is constant. Then there's the storage requirements. To make wind reliable, you need batteries. At grid scale, that becomes impossible with current technologies. Wind power remains an expensive pipe dream, lining the pockets of a few at the expense of the many.

Wind turbines are getting bigger, more efficient, and are delivering higher output. That sounds impressive, but it isn't compared to other sources. A single nuclear plant, for example, produces around 1,750 megawatts. To match that, you need roughly 150 large turbines. Wind uses over 100X more land than nuclear for the same output. And turbines, of course, only produce power when the wind is blowing. Nuclear is constant. Then there's the storage requirements. To make wind reliable, you need batteries. At grid scale, that becomes impossible with current technologies. Wind power remains an expensive pipe dream, lining the pockets of a few at the expense of the many.

Electroverse

21,611 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

#zhanglinghe at press conference of documentary "Exploring the Future: The Answer is Earth" in Beijing🌱 Q: have you heard of Betz's Law? zlh🚀: it refers to the limit of how much wind energy can be converted into electricity. there is something called the Betz limit, which means that when a wind turbine converts wind energy into electrical energy, there is a maximum efficiency. about 59% or more precisely around 59.3%. this is a physical limit. to actually reach this limit, the conditions must be very ideal. for example, factors like the static pressure before and after the rotor, and the number of blades, all need to be in an optimal state. in real life, wind turbines don't reach that ideal. an efficiency of about 70%–80% (of the theoretical limit) is already considered very good. and in our country, the wind farms I've visited are basically among the best in the world, their conversion efficiency is extremely high.

#zhanglinghe at press conference of documentary "Exploring the Future: The Answer is Earth" in Beijing🌱 Q: have you heard of Betz's Law? zlh🚀: it refers to the limit of how much wind energy can be converted into electricity. there is something called the Betz limit, which means that when a wind turbine converts wind energy into electrical energy, there is a maximum efficiency. about 59% or more precisely around 59.3%. this is a physical limit. to actually reach this limit, the conditions must be very ideal. for example, factors like the static pressure before and after the rotor, and the number of blades, all need to be in an optimal state. in real life, wind turbines don't reach that ideal. an efficiency of about 70%–80% (of the theoretical limit) is already considered very good. and in our country, the wind farms I've visited are basically among the best in the world, their conversion efficiency is extremely high.

张凌赫的小核桃𖹭

308,738 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

After CNN NewsNight's Abby Phillip defends unreliable wind and solar energy, Ben Ferguson drops a TRUTH BOMB and torches the climate cult: Phillip: DOE ended "wind and solar subsidies, taking more energy out of the system, not putting it into the system." Ferguson: "If you look at windmills and you look at them in Texas and other states, they have been a disaster compared to what they were supposed to produce. They're not producing. So doing this in Europe as well, the data is now there. The solar and wind isn't gonna fix our grid, and then if you're saying any more solar panels or wind turbines, we're totally screwed." After Phillip pushes a line about "all of the above" energy nonsense, Ferguson responds "But if it's ineffective and doesn't work, why do it? ... My tax dollars should no go to support or subsidize a Green New Deal that is a disaster for the grid." Later, Yemisi Egbewole comes in from the top rope: "Let's just admit that we're better than Europe because we have AC."

After CNN NewsNight's Abby Phillip defends unreliable wind and solar energy, Ben Ferguson drops a TRUTH BOMB and torches the climate cult: Phillip: DOE ended "wind and solar subsidies, taking more energy out of the system, not putting it into the system." Ferguson: "If you look at windmills and you look at them in Texas and other states, they have been a disaster compared to what they were supposed to produce. They're not producing. So doing this in Europe as well, the data is now there. The solar and wind isn't gonna fix our grid, and then if you're saying any more solar panels or wind turbines, we're totally screwed." After Phillip pushes a line about "all of the above" energy nonsense, Ferguson responds "But if it's ineffective and doesn't work, why do it? ... My tax dollars should no go to support or subsidize a Green New Deal that is a disaster for the grid." Later, Yemisi Egbewole comes in from the top rope: "Let's just admit that we're better than Europe because we have AC."

Steve Guest

58,139 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Solar and wind are sold as cheaper than coal, gas or nuclear using a number called LCOE (Levelized Cost of Energy). But LCOE is a junk metric. It pretends that one-megawatt-hour of intermittent power is the same as one-megawatt-hour of reliable power. It isn't. When the sun doesn't shine or the wind doesn't blow, you still need electricity. So backup plants (coal, gas or nuclear) must run in the background, ready to fire instantly. LCOE fails to count that cost. It also ignores the miles of transmission lines for remote wind farms, the giant storage systems to cover lulls, the stabilizers to keep frequency steady, and the massive overbuild needed just to survive bad weather weeks.These hidden costs explode as wind and solar take over more of the grid. On paper, LCOE makes these renewables look cheap. In reality, they drive up costs system-wide. That's why nations with the most wind and solar have the highest electricity prices. LCOE isn't just misleading, it's a lie.

Solar and wind are sold as cheaper than coal, gas or nuclear using a number called LCOE (Levelized Cost of Energy). But LCOE is a junk metric. It pretends that one-megawatt-hour of intermittent power is the same as one-megawatt-hour of reliable power. It isn't. When the sun doesn't shine or the wind doesn't blow, you still need electricity. So backup plants (coal, gas or nuclear) must run in the background, ready to fire instantly. LCOE fails to count that cost. It also ignores the miles of transmission lines for remote wind farms, the giant storage systems to cover lulls, the stabilizers to keep frequency steady, and the massive overbuild needed just to survive bad weather weeks.These hidden costs explode as wind and solar take over more of the grid. On paper, LCOE makes these renewables look cheap. In reality, they drive up costs system-wide. That's why nations with the most wind and solar have the highest electricity prices. LCOE isn't just misleading, it's a lie.

Electroverse

13,445 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

A new study shows offshore wind farms can alter ocean currents. By 2050, offshore wind capacity in the North Sea is set to increase more than tenfold. Researchers modelled the long-term impact. Turbines slow surface winds, foundations obstruct tidal flow, and those wake effects combine to slow surface currents by up to 20%, not just immediately around the wind farms, but across the North Sea. That changes sediment movement, water mixing, and marine ecosystems. This is not a local effect, it is a system-level change, and the full impacts are unknown.

A new study shows offshore wind farms can alter ocean currents. By 2050, offshore wind capacity in the North Sea is set to increase more than tenfold. Researchers modelled the long-term impact. Turbines slow surface winds, foundations obstruct tidal flow, and those wake effects combine to slow surface currents by up to 20%, not just immediately around the wind farms, but across the North Sea. That changes sediment movement, water mixing, and marine ecosystems. This is not a local effect, it is a system-level change, and the full impacts are unknown.

Electroverse

19,391 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Wind power is sold as clean, but the turbines need extensive raw materials. Taking just the blades, a single set of three blades uses as many as 40 mature balsa trees. Balsa wood is light, strong and flexible, which makes it useful inside giant turbine blades that need to bend with the wind. Demand has surged and legal supply cannot keep up, so wild balsa is cut from protected Amazon rainforest where it should not be touched. It is then mixed into the legal supply and passed off as plantation wood. By the time it reaches manufacturers, illegal rainforest timber looks clean on paper. More than 500,000 balsa trees are illegally logged each year to feed wind turbine demand. Protected forest cut down, indigenous land raided, biodiversity destroyed - sold to the West as "green" energy.

Wind power is sold as clean, but the turbines need extensive raw materials. Taking just the blades, a single set of three blades uses as many as 40 mature balsa trees. Balsa wood is light, strong and flexible, which makes it useful inside giant turbine blades that need to bend with the wind. Demand has surged and legal supply cannot keep up, so wild balsa is cut from protected Amazon rainforest where it should not be touched. It is then mixed into the legal supply and passed off as plantation wood. By the time it reaches manufacturers, illegal rainforest timber looks clean on paper. More than 500,000 balsa trees are illegally logged each year to feed wind turbine demand. Protected forest cut down, indigenous land raided, biodiversity destroyed - sold to the West as "green" energy.

Electroverse

27,352 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The vast majority of hunters would be better off if they taped their magnification at 8x-10x power. Period. Cranking it higher is one of the most common mistakes in the woods. More magnification doesn’t make you more accurate. It makes you more likely to blow a wind call. More likely to miscall whether you hit the animal. More likely to be incapable of getting a follow-up shot. And for a lot of guys, it cranks up the buck fever, because the wobble zone looks bigger and more erratic than it actually is.

The vast majority of hunters would be better off if they taped their magnification at 8x-10x power. Period. Cranking it higher is one of the most common mistakes in the woods. More magnification doesn’t make you more accurate. It makes you more likely to blow a wind call. More likely to miscall whether you hit the animal. More likely to be incapable of getting a follow-up shot. And for a lot of guys, it cranks up the buck fever, because the wobble zone looks bigger and more erratic than it actually is.

Cliff Gray

15,840 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Trump: Wind is a disaster. You can take 1,000 times more than energy out of a hole in the ground this big. It’s called oil and gas. This big that nobody would even see. You can take 1,000 times more power because the wind is intermittent, it doesn't work. We won’t allow it. Starmer: We believe in a mix. Oil and gas will be with us for a very long time. And that will be part of the mix but also wind, solar, increasingly nuclear as we go forward

Trump: Wind is a disaster. You can take 1,000 times more than energy out of a hole in the ground this big. It’s called oil and gas. This big that nobody would even see. You can take 1,000 times more power because the wind is intermittent, it doesn't work. We won’t allow it. Starmer: We believe in a mix. Oil and gas will be with us for a very long time. And that will be part of the mix but also wind, solar, increasingly nuclear as we go forward

Acyn

68,403 просмотров • 1 год назад

UK wind farms are being paid billions to switch off and not produce energy, with Britain's largest wind farm paid to sit idle 71% of the time. It's called "curtailment". Wind farms are built in places with no grid capacity to carry the power. Regulators then pay them for the electricity they 'would' have generated. Originally meant as a short-term fix, it's now a business model. Many companies make more money by not generating power than by selling it. And the insanity doesn't stop there. Often the same companies that own the idle wind farms also own the gas plants paid to fill the gap. So they win on both sides of the equation. This grotesque system drives up bills, wastes resources, and exposes just how broken the UK's green energy regulations really are.

UK wind farms are being paid billions to switch off and not produce energy, with Britain's largest wind farm paid to sit idle 71% of the time. It's called "curtailment". Wind farms are built in places with no grid capacity to carry the power. Regulators then pay them for the electricity they 'would' have generated. Originally meant as a short-term fix, it's now a business model. Many companies make more money by not generating power than by selling it. And the insanity doesn't stop there. Often the same companies that own the idle wind farms also own the gas plants paid to fill the gap. So they win on both sides of the equation. This grotesque system drives up bills, wastes resources, and exposes just how broken the UK's green energy regulations really are.

Electroverse

44,948 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The world has spent approximately $6–7 trillion cumulatively on wind turbines and solar panels. With that amount, we could have built up to 1,400 standard nuclear power plants (each with ~1–1.2 GW capacity, typical for modern large reactors). With proper maintenance, safety upgrades, and regulatory approvals, many nuclear plants last 60 years- 80 years or more. A typical wind or solar farm lasts about 20 years, meaning we would need to spend up to $21 trillion to produce the same energy as nuclear. With $21 trillion, the world could theoretically fund up to 4,000 nuclear power plants. Now lets talk about wind turbines. Without the Production Tax Credit (PTC), many wind farms were not economically viable from electricity sales alone, due to high upfront costs, intermittency (requiring backup power), and competition from cheaper sources like natural gas. The tax credits effectively offset a significant portion of costs—in some cases covering much or all of the investment for tax-liable entities—turning otherwise marginal or unprofitable projects into attractive ones. Are you seeing the scam? It's time to start building more nuclear and less of these green dream turbines and solar panels.

The world has spent approximately $6–7 trillion cumulatively on wind turbines and solar panels. With that amount, we could have built up to 1,400 standard nuclear power plants (each with ~1–1.2 GW capacity, typical for modern large reactors). With proper maintenance, safety upgrades, and regulatory approvals, many nuclear plants last 60 years- 80 years or more. A typical wind or solar farm lasts about 20 years, meaning we would need to spend up to $21 trillion to produce the same energy as nuclear. With $21 trillion, the world could theoretically fund up to 4,000 nuclear power plants. Now lets talk about wind turbines. Without the Production Tax Credit (PTC), many wind farms were not economically viable from electricity sales alone, due to high upfront costs, intermittency (requiring backup power), and competition from cheaper sources like natural gas. The tax credits effectively offset a significant portion of costs—in some cases covering much or all of the investment for tax-liable entities—turning otherwise marginal or unprofitable projects into attractive ones. Are you seeing the scam? It's time to start building more nuclear and less of these green dream turbines and solar panels.

John Lee Pettimore

120,600 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Britain has paid billions in subsidies to build thousands of turbines across its countryside. But when high pressure systems move in, wind collapses. During these calm spells, wind generation can fall to almost nothing, as low as 0.2% of the grid. When that happens, the grid scrambles. Coal is restarted, gas plants carry the bulk of the load and supply warnings are issued. This is the reality few in elected office seem to grasp. When the weather calms, which it regularly does, wind power disappears from the grid. Britain only stays online thanks to dispatchable energy systems picking up the slack. The country would be better off, both financially and in terms of energy security, if it simply ran off dispatchable power in the first place.

Britain has paid billions in subsidies to build thousands of turbines across its countryside. But when high pressure systems move in, wind collapses. During these calm spells, wind generation can fall to almost nothing, as low as 0.2% of the grid. When that happens, the grid scrambles. Coal is restarted, gas plants carry the bulk of the load and supply warnings are issued. This is the reality few in elected office seem to grasp. When the weather calms, which it regularly does, wind power disappears from the grid. Britain only stays online thanks to dispatchable energy systems picking up the slack. The country would be better off, both financially and in terms of energy security, if it simply ran off dispatchable power in the first place.

Electroverse

11,382 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

“Work has been suspended at a major wind farm project south west of Warwick after storms snapped a wind turbine blade. McIntrye Wind Farm recently connected some of its turbines to the grid, those works are on hold as it investigates the incident.” “The 458MW Coopers Gap wind farm in south west Queensland, the newest and biggest wind project built to date in Australia – is to undergo major repairs after faults were found in its commissioning process. AGL, which operates the $850 million project and is a joint owner through the Powering Australia Renewables Fund, said in a statement that the blades of one of the 123 turbines will have to be replaced entirely, while GE Catcon is also going to replace “generators” – referring to the equipment in the nacelle at the top of the wind tower – in a further 50 turbines.” •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Not only are wind farms unreliable in terms of wind dependent generation. They break easily as we saw last week on the Darling Downs. If the blades on a wind farm can’t survive a summer storm on the Darling Downs they will be useless. This is just another example of wind farms being unreliable. A few years ago wind farm had to replace 50 out of 123 turbines just after it was commissioned. Australia cannot not afford to be pursuing Net Zero policies being pushed by the two major parties. We should focus on using our coal, uranium and gas resources instead of imported materials. Quote from: #auspol

“Work has been suspended at a major wind farm project south west of Warwick after storms snapped a wind turbine blade. McIntrye Wind Farm recently connected some of its turbines to the grid, those works are on hold as it investigates the incident.” “The 458MW Coopers Gap wind farm in south west Queensland, the newest and biggest wind project built to date in Australia – is to undergo major repairs after faults were found in its commissioning process. AGL, which operates the $850 million project and is a joint owner through the Powering Australia Renewables Fund, said in a statement that the blades of one of the 123 turbines will have to be replaced entirely, while GE Catcon is also going to replace “generators” – referring to the equipment in the nacelle at the top of the wind tower – in a further 50 turbines.” •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Not only are wind farms unreliable in terms of wind dependent generation. They break easily as we saw last week on the Darling Downs. If the blades on a wind farm can’t survive a summer storm on the Darling Downs they will be useless. This is just another example of wind farms being unreliable. A few years ago wind farm had to replace 50 out of 123 turbines just after it was commissioned. Australia cannot not afford to be pursuing Net Zero policies being pushed by the two major parties. We should focus on using our coal, uranium and gas resources instead of imported materials. Quote from: #auspol

Gerard Rennick

35,158 просмотров • 1 год назад

A modern wind turbine looks deceptively simple from the outside. The largest onshore turbines now use blades stretching beyond 80 metres, sweeping more than 20,000 m² of air. Yet the entire structure rotates at only around 10-20 RPM. Actually, inside the nacelle is a precision gearbox that transforms this slow, high-torque rotation into the 1,000-1,800 RPM required by the generator. This gearbox is one of the most demanding mechanical systems in renewable energy. It continuously transmits megawatts of power, while surviving changing wind loads, vibration and billions of fatigue cycles over a 20-25 year lifespan. Inside are planetary gear stages, precision-ground alloy steel gears, advanced bearings, lubrication systems and cooling circuits. Some of the largest geared turbines contain close to 1000+ liters of specialised synthetic oil to manage lubrication and heat during continuous operation. A single large onshore turbine can cost around $4-5 million, with complete projects costing significantly more after foundations, roads, electrical systems and installation. The goal is for the machine to recover its capital cost within roughly 5-10 years, then continue producing electricity for decades. This is why reliability is the biggest challenge. Gearboxes, bearings, generators and electrical systems remain critical failure points, pushing engineers toward better materials, sensors and predictive maintenance. The scale of this industry is enormous. China has become the world’s largest wind turbine manufacturing and exporting hub, with several Chinese companies among the largest turbine suppliers globally. Building a wind turbine is not just about capturing wind in an efficient manner, It is about creating a machine that can convert wind energy into electricity for millions of hours with minimal human intervention and sustain millions of load cycles.

A modern wind turbine looks deceptively simple from the outside. The largest onshore turbines now use blades stretching beyond 80 metres, sweeping more than 20,000 m² of air. Yet the entire structure rotates at only around 10-20 RPM. Actually, inside the nacelle is a precision gearbox that transforms this slow, high-torque rotation into the 1,000-1,800 RPM required by the generator. This gearbox is one of the most demanding mechanical systems in renewable energy. It continuously transmits megawatts of power, while surviving changing wind loads, vibration and billions of fatigue cycles over a 20-25 year lifespan. Inside are planetary gear stages, precision-ground alloy steel gears, advanced bearings, lubrication systems and cooling circuits. Some of the largest geared turbines contain close to 1000+ liters of specialised synthetic oil to manage lubrication and heat during continuous operation. A single large onshore turbine can cost around $4-5 million, with complete projects costing significantly more after foundations, roads, electrical systems and installation. The goal is for the machine to recover its capital cost within roughly 5-10 years, then continue producing electricity for decades. This is why reliability is the biggest challenge. Gearboxes, bearings, generators and electrical systems remain critical failure points, pushing engineers toward better materials, sensors and predictive maintenance. The scale of this industry is enormous. China has become the world’s largest wind turbine manufacturing and exporting hub, with several Chinese companies among the largest turbine suppliers globally. Building a wind turbine is not just about capturing wind in an efficient manner, It is about creating a machine that can convert wind energy into electricity for millions of hours with minimal human intervention and sustain millions of load cycles.

Ammanichanda

64,508 просмотров • 26 дней назад

🇨🇳 China just tested a wind turbine floating 2,000 metres in the sky... and it worked. The S2000 is a helium-filled airship carrying turbines, tethered to the ground by cables that also transmit electricity. At 2,000 metres, winds are stronger and more consistent than at ground level. In recent tests over Sichuan, it generated 385 kWh which is enough to power around 1,500 homes for a day. Source: dw News

🇨🇳 China just tested a wind turbine floating 2,000 metres in the sky... and it worked. The S2000 is a helium-filled airship carrying turbines, tethered to the ground by cables that also transmit electricity. At 2,000 metres, winds are stronger and more consistent than at ground level. In recent tests over Sichuan, it generated 385 kWh which is enough to power around 1,500 homes for a day. Source: dw News

Mario Nawfal

216,103 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“The Coming Green Energy Bailout” Wind farms are pulling a mass bait and switch with price hikes of 48% to 64%. Reneging on those cheap promises of cheap energy. So they took your money to build it. Now they'll take more every month to keep it going. Meanwhile, Texas plunges into energy crisis once again. With electricity prices soaring 200-fold. Because the wind isn’t blowing. “Renewables” are a ten-trillion dollar scam. And they’re just getting started.

“The Coming Green Energy Bailout” Wind farms are pulling a mass bait and switch with price hikes of 48% to 64%. Reneging on those cheap promises of cheap energy. So they took your money to build it. Now they'll take more every month to keep it going. Meanwhile, Texas plunges into energy crisis once again. With electricity prices soaring 200-fold. Because the wind isn’t blowing. “Renewables” are a ten-trillion dollar scam. And they’re just getting started.

Peter St Onge, Ph.D.

1,093,103 просмотров • 3 лет назад