正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Why does Warren Buffett avoid real estate even when it’s cheap? Because one asset class lets him move billions in minutes, the other can trap him in years of negotiations. Buffett’s take is brutally simple: Stocks = speed, scale, finality. Real estate = delays, complexity, endless humans + paperwork....

GaryStoneSWS's profile picture

Gary Stone

27,848 subscribers

390,393 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育财经
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Warren Buffett: "It is a different game that requires a different type of person to enjoy it." At 94 years old, Warren Buffett has a clear preference when it comes to investing, and it's not real estate. When asked about real estate versus stocks, Buffett argues the stock market wins on almost every practical dimension. "There is simply much more opportunity in the United States security market than in real estate." His reasoning comes down to three things: speed, simplicity, and certainty of completion. In stocks, you can execute billions of dollars worth of business anonymously in five minutes, and once the trade is done, it's done. The completion rate is essentially 100% once buyer and seller agree on price. Real estate is the opposite. You're dealing with a single owner or family that may have held a property for a long time, possibly borrowed too much against it, or is facing negative trends. Every transaction becomes an enormous, drawn-out decision. "In real estate, signing the deal is just the start of another phase where people negotiate more and more things." Buffett contrasts this with the stock market: "If someone needs to sell 20,000 shares of Berkshire and the price is right, it is done in five seconds and closes every time." His late partner Charlie Munger took a different view. Munger enjoyed real estate deals and continued doing them even in the last five years of his life. But Buffett says that if Munger had to choose exclusively between the two at age 21, even he would have chosen stocks. For Buffett, the conclusion is simple: "We find it much better when people are ready to pick up the phone and you can do hundreds of millions of dollars of business in a day. I have been spoiled by this efficiency, and I like being spoiled, so we will keep it that way." Real estate can produce great returns, but the friction involved in negotiations, multiple parties, and drawn-out timelines makes it a fundamentally different game. For most investors, the stock market offers far more opportunity with far less complexity.
5:35

Warren Buffett: "It is a different game that requires a different type of person to enjoy it." At 94 years old, Warren Buffett has a clear preference when it comes to investing, and it's not real estate. When asked about real estate versus stocks, Buffett argues the stock market wins on almost every practical dimension. "There is simply much more opportunity in the United States security market than in real estate." His reasoning comes down to three things: speed, simplicity, and certainty of completion. In stocks, you can execute billions of dollars worth of business anonymously in five minutes, and once the trade is done, it's done. The completion rate is essentially 100% once buyer and seller agree on price. Real estate is the opposite. You're dealing with a single owner or family that may have held a property for a long time, possibly borrowed too much against it, or is facing negative trends. Every transaction becomes an enormous, drawn-out decision. "In real estate, signing the deal is just the start of another phase where people negotiate more and more things." Buffett contrasts this with the stock market: "If someone needs to sell 20,000 shares of Berkshire and the price is right, it is done in five seconds and closes every time." His late partner Charlie Munger took a different view. Munger enjoyed real estate deals and continued doing them even in the last five years of his life. But Buffett says that if Munger had to choose exclusively between the two at age 21, even he would have chosen stocks. For Buffett, the conclusion is simple: "We find it much better when people are ready to pick up the phone and you can do hundreds of millions of dollars of business in a day. I have been spoiled by this efficiency, and I like being spoiled, so we will keep it that way." Real estate can produce great returns, but the friction involved in negotiations, multiple parties, and drawn-out timelines makes it a fundamentally different game. For most investors, the stock market offers far more opportunity with far less complexity.

Big Brain Investing

42,809 次观看 • 3 个月前

Warren Buffett: When Everyone Prefers Gambling, Value Is Harder to Find Berkshire Hathaway Chairman Warren Buffett Warren Buffett said in a July 15 CNBC interview that truly attractive investment opportunities do not come along often, and investors are very lucky to find even one good opportunity every few years. But because people love to gamble, the financial industry can make more money cultivating gamblers than genuine investors. Buffett said value opportunities naturally become harder to find when everyone prefers speculation. Rational investors should act only when rare opportunities arise and remain patient the rest of the time.
1:49

Warren Buffett: When Everyone Prefers Gambling, Value Is Harder to Find Berkshire Hathaway Chairman Warren Buffett Warren Buffett said in a July 15 CNBC interview that truly attractive investment opportunities do not come along often, and investors are very lucky to find even one good opportunity every few years. But because people love to gamble, the financial industry can make more money cultivating gamblers than genuine investors. Buffett said value opportunities naturally become harder to find when everyone prefers speculation. Rational investors should act only when rare opportunities arise and remain patient the rest of the time.

Wu Blockchain

28,868 次观看 • 29 天前

Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger didn't avoid real estate because they thought it was a bad asset class They stayed away because they believed they had no durable advantage in it. When asked why real estate had never become a significant part of Berkshire Hathaway's portfolio, Buffett pointed to two reasons: an unfavorable tax structure and the absence of a competitive edge. He explained that Berkshire, as a C corporation, faces an extra layer of corporate taxation on real estate income, putting it at a disadvantage against REITs, partnerships, and S corporations. As Buffett put it: "Real estate tends to be a very lousy investment for people who are taxed under subchapter C." Beyond taxes, Buffett argued that developed real estate is usually priced efficiently. Unlike public stocks, where Berkshire believes it can identify mispriced businesses, most commercial real estate transactions involve buyers and sellers who have access to similar information. According to Buffett, the best opportunities arise only when markets become highly inefficient — such as during the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) era in the early 1990s, when distressed assets, forced sellers, and scarce financing created widespread mispricing. Looking back, Buffett admitted Berkshire wasn't fully prepared to capitalize on those conditions and believed they missed an opportunity to earn substantial returns. He also recalled that one of the few major real estate deals Berkshire seriously pursued was the Irvine Company in the late 1970s, though the acquisition ultimately went to a group organized by Mobil Oil. Reflecting on his partnership with Charlie Munger, Buffett joked that Munger would often spend several minutes arguing against a deal—and the more passionate the objections, the more Buffett suspected Charlie actually liked it. Source: Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting (2003) Q&A
7:00

Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger didn't avoid real estate because they thought it was a bad asset class They stayed away because they believed they had no durable advantage in it. When asked why real estate had never become a significant part of Berkshire Hathaway's portfolio, Buffett pointed to two reasons: an unfavorable tax structure and the absence of a competitive edge. He explained that Berkshire, as a C corporation, faces an extra layer of corporate taxation on real estate income, putting it at a disadvantage against REITs, partnerships, and S corporations. As Buffett put it: "Real estate tends to be a very lousy investment for people who are taxed under subchapter C." Beyond taxes, Buffett argued that developed real estate is usually priced efficiently. Unlike public stocks, where Berkshire believes it can identify mispriced businesses, most commercial real estate transactions involve buyers and sellers who have access to similar information. According to Buffett, the best opportunities arise only when markets become highly inefficient — such as during the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) era in the early 1990s, when distressed assets, forced sellers, and scarce financing created widespread mispricing. Looking back, Buffett admitted Berkshire wasn't fully prepared to capitalize on those conditions and believed they missed an opportunity to earn substantial returns. He also recalled that one of the few major real estate deals Berkshire seriously pursued was the Irvine Company in the late 1970s, though the acquisition ultimately went to a group organized by Mobil Oil. Reflecting on his partnership with Charlie Munger, Buffett joked that Munger would often spend several minutes arguing against a deal—and the more passionate the objections, the more Buffett suspected Charlie actually liked it. Source: Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting (2003) Q&A

Black Edge

20,087 次观看 • 28 天前

Warren Buffett thoughtfully explains why investing in stocks/equities is better than real estate, during Berkshire's latest annual meeting: "In respect to real estate, it's so much harder than stocks in terms of negotiation of deals, time spent, the involvement of multiple parties in the ownership. Usually when real estate gets in trouble, you find out you're dealing with more than equity holder. But there have been times when large amounts of real estate... I've changed hands at bargain prices, but usually stocks were cheaper, but there were a lot easier to do. Charlie did more real estate. Charlie enjoyed real estate transactions, and he actually did a fair number of them in the last five years of his life. But he was playing a game that was an interesting game to him. But I think if you'd asked him to make a choice when he was 21, he'd either be in stocks exclusively the rest of his life or real estate the rest of his life. He would have chosen stocks in a second. There's just so much more opportunity, at least in the United States. There's so much more opportunity that presents itself in the security market than it does in real estate and in real estate. You're usually dealing with a single owner or a family that owns maybe a large property they've had a long time. Maybe they've borrowed too much money against them. Maybe the population trends are against them. But to them, it's an enormous... When you walk down to the New York Stock Exchange, you can do billions of dollars worth of business totally anonymous, and you can do it in five minutes. And the trades are complete when they're complete. In real estate, when you make a deal, a big deal with a distressed lender, when you sign the deal, then you go into another phase. Then people start negotiating more things and more things. It's a whole different game. And a different type of person, to some extent, enjoys the game. We did a few real estate deals that came our way in 2008 and 2009, but the amount of time that they would take us compared to doing something intelligent and probably better in securities, there was just no comparison. I mean, in a real estate deal, every sentence is important. In stocks, if somebody needs to sell 20,000 shares of Berkshire or something and they call us and the price is right, it's done in five seconds. And it closes all the time."
2:36

Warren Buffett thoughtfully explains why investing in stocks/equities is better than real estate, during Berkshire's latest annual meeting: "In respect to real estate, it's so much harder than stocks in terms of negotiation of deals, time spent, the involvement of multiple parties in the ownership. Usually when real estate gets in trouble, you find out you're dealing with more than equity holder. But there have been times when large amounts of real estate... I've changed hands at bargain prices, but usually stocks were cheaper, but there were a lot easier to do. Charlie did more real estate. Charlie enjoyed real estate transactions, and he actually did a fair number of them in the last five years of his life. But he was playing a game that was an interesting game to him. But I think if you'd asked him to make a choice when he was 21, he'd either be in stocks exclusively the rest of his life or real estate the rest of his life. He would have chosen stocks in a second. There's just so much more opportunity, at least in the United States. There's so much more opportunity that presents itself in the security market than it does in real estate and in real estate. You're usually dealing with a single owner or a family that owns maybe a large property they've had a long time. Maybe they've borrowed too much money against them. Maybe the population trends are against them. But to them, it's an enormous... When you walk down to the New York Stock Exchange, you can do billions of dollars worth of business totally anonymous, and you can do it in five minutes. And the trades are complete when they're complete. In real estate, when you make a deal, a big deal with a distressed lender, when you sign the deal, then you go into another phase. Then people start negotiating more things and more things. It's a whole different game. And a different type of person, to some extent, enjoys the game. We did a few real estate deals that came our way in 2008 and 2009, but the amount of time that they would take us compared to doing something intelligent and probably better in securities, there was just no comparison. I mean, in a real estate deal, every sentence is important. In stocks, if somebody needs to sell 20,000 shares of Berkshire or something and they call us and the price is right, it's done in five seconds. And it closes all the time."

Triple Net Investor

1,042,548 次观看 • 1 年前

Warren Buffett explains why he prefers productive assets over Bitcoin. He says he would gladly pay billions for a small share of U.S. farmland or apartments because they produce real value like food and housing. But even if he could buy all the Bitcoin in the world, he wouldn't take it, because it produces nothing and only has value if someone else pays more later. Buffett argues that Bitcoin is a speculative asset, not an investment, driven by hype, trading costs, and money changing hands rather than real wealth creation. In contrast, true assets must deliver something tangible over time. Bitcoin, he says, is speculation, not an investment: hype, fees, and money changing hands- without creating real wealth. True investments deliver tangible value over time.
1:42

Warren Buffett explains why he prefers productive assets over Bitcoin. He says he would gladly pay billions for a small share of U.S. farmland or apartments because they produce real value like food and housing. But even if he could buy all the Bitcoin in the world, he wouldn't take it, because it produces nothing and only has value if someone else pays more later. Buffett argues that Bitcoin is a speculative asset, not an investment, driven by hype, trading costs, and money changing hands rather than real wealth creation. In contrast, true assets must deliver something tangible over time. Bitcoin, he says, is speculation, not an investment: hype, fees, and money changing hands- without creating real wealth. True investments deliver tangible value over time.

Stocks World

27,526 次观看 • 6 个月前

Charlie Villanueva says he don’t like Dwyane Wade telling Patrick Beverley he can’t speak on the debate between him and James Harden: “I would disagree with him on the part where he said you can’t speak on that because you can’t fu*k with me or I’m way better then you This, that, and the third. That’s why I would disagree with him because I think Pat Bev is more equipped to speak on it because being in the NBA it’s exclusive. It’s like going to the fu*king playboy mansion, it’s an exclusive group. It’s only exclusive people in the party, so I’m in there I seen what’s going on, so I can speak on it. Because I’ve been there. So, what I’m saying is Pat Bev is in the league, he experienced D-Wade maybe he didn’t experience when D-Wade was fu*king D-Wade but he’s seen something. He knows something. So he can speak on it.” (Via ToTheBaha)
2:46

Charlie Villanueva says he don’t like Dwyane Wade telling Patrick Beverley he can’t speak on the debate between him and James Harden: “I would disagree with him on the part where he said you can’t speak on that because you can’t fu*k with me or I’m way better then you This, that, and the third. That’s why I would disagree with him because I think Pat Bev is more equipped to speak on it because being in the NBA it’s exclusive. It’s like going to the fu*king playboy mansion, it’s an exclusive group. It’s only exclusive people in the party, so I’m in there I seen what’s going on, so I can speak on it. Because I’ve been there. So, what I’m saying is Pat Bev is in the league, he experienced D-Wade maybe he didn’t experience when D-Wade was fu*king D-Wade but he’s seen something. He knows something. So he can speak on it.” (Via ToTheBaha)

NBA Courtside

62,632 次观看 • 4 个月前

Warren Buffett just broke his silence on Bill Gates and the Epstein connection. In a new CNBC interview, Buffett said he hasn’t spoken to Gates since the Epstein documents surfaced. When asked why, he replied: “I don’t want to be in a position where I know things. At some moment, I could get called as a witness.” He added that Epstein had an uncanny ability to figure out people’s weaknesses — “Men are going to like sex… and some of them are going to like not paying taxes… he figured out what their weakness was.” Buffett, who donated billions to the Gates Foundation over the years, made it clear he’s keeping his distance until things are “cleared up.” It’s a rare, candid moment from one of the world’s most respected billionaires that makes the whole Epstein saga feel even more uncomfortable. What do you make of Buffett’s decision to step back? Credit: NBC News (YouTube)
2:15

Warren Buffett just broke his silence on Bill Gates and the Epstein connection. In a new CNBC interview, Buffett said he hasn’t spoken to Gates since the Epstein documents surfaced. When asked why, he replied: “I don’t want to be in a position where I know things. At some moment, I could get called as a witness.” He added that Epstein had an uncanny ability to figure out people’s weaknesses — “Men are going to like sex… and some of them are going to like not paying taxes… he figured out what their weakness was.” Buffett, who donated billions to the Gates Foundation over the years, made it clear he’s keeping his distance until things are “cleared up.” It’s a rare, candid moment from one of the world’s most respected billionaires that makes the whole Epstein saga feel even more uncomfortable. What do you make of Buffett’s decision to step back? Credit: NBC News (YouTube)

Camus

36,524 次观看 • 4 个月前

One thing everyone should appreciate about Spencer Pratt is that when he’s asked a question, he doesn’t deflect. He just answers the question This is so different than basically everyone else in politics CNN asks him, why he’s a Republican He doesn’t dance around the real reason, even through many democrats likely wouldn’t like the answer It’s for the second amendment But then he explains exactly why. It makes perfect sense He explains his plan to protect schools from fun threats even thought he’s for the second amendment and having a gun to protect yourself He has a real, and clear plan One other thing I notice here is CNN asks the question and lets him answer. They don’t push back with propaganda, they just ask a few questions for more clarity This is what the media used to be, and should be. Good job Spencer and CNN for this exchange
1:38

One thing everyone should appreciate about Spencer Pratt is that when he’s asked a question, he doesn’t deflect. He just answers the question This is so different than basically everyone else in politics CNN asks him, why he’s a Republican He doesn’t dance around the real reason, even through many democrats likely wouldn’t like the answer It’s for the second amendment But then he explains exactly why. It makes perfect sense He explains his plan to protect schools from fun threats even thought he’s for the second amendment and having a gun to protect yourself He has a real, and clear plan One other thing I notice here is CNN asks the question and lets him answer. They don’t push back with propaganda, they just ask a few questions for more clarity This is what the media used to be, and should be. Good job Spencer and CNN for this exchange

Wall Street Apes

22,869 次观看 • 2 个月前

Gavin Newsom’s $101 million dollar Pacific Palisades low income housing projects EXPOSED The new housing complexes come with ‘covenants,’ after a certain amount of years they are no longer low income and convert to market rate James Li It’s a full blown land grab, “One of the largest industries that donated to him was real estate” “Let me tell you what Gavin Newsom is really up to with this hundred million dollar low income housing project in the Palisades. This ultimately is a real estate play in my opinion, because they want this building to go into nice affluent neighborhoods. Because the value of that building is going to be astronomically higher than versus building it in another area where it's underdeveloped or it's a new neighborhood, or it's more on the outskirts of la and ultimately all these affordable units that they have covenants on them. So in 15, 20, 25 years, depending on the, the exact building, all of those affordable housing units will convert to market rate. So that's why they want it in those areas. It's not because like, oh, we're helping the homeless people out. It's like, oh no, this, this is just like a giveaway to real estate developers, right? One of the largest industries that donated to him was real estate. So like this is just him placating to his donors, making sure that they're needs, quote unquote, are being met. This is a long term real estate play to say, okay, we're going to put this building here because in 25 years this building will be worth like 20x if we versus we put in another neighborhood.” It’s all about kickbacks for Gavin Newsom’s donors You know the new low income housing complexes will covenants because that’s what the other properties in LA and San Diego come with. It’s the Democrat scam
1:09

Gavin Newsom’s $101 million dollar Pacific Palisades low income housing projects EXPOSED The new housing complexes come with ‘covenants,’ after a certain amount of years they are no longer low income and convert to market rate James Li It’s a full blown land grab, “One of the largest industries that donated to him was real estate” “Let me tell you what Gavin Newsom is really up to with this hundred million dollar low income housing project in the Palisades. This ultimately is a real estate play in my opinion, because they want this building to go into nice affluent neighborhoods. Because the value of that building is going to be astronomically higher than versus building it in another area where it's underdeveloped or it's a new neighborhood, or it's more on the outskirts of la and ultimately all these affordable units that they have covenants on them. So in 15, 20, 25 years, depending on the, the exact building, all of those affordable housing units will convert to market rate. So that's why they want it in those areas. It's not because like, oh, we're helping the homeless people out. It's like, oh no, this, this is just like a giveaway to real estate developers, right? One of the largest industries that donated to him was real estate. So like this is just him placating to his donors, making sure that they're needs, quote unquote, are being met. This is a long term real estate play to say, okay, we're going to put this building here because in 25 years this building will be worth like 20x if we versus we put in another neighborhood.” It’s all about kickbacks for Gavin Newsom’s donors You know the new low income housing complexes will covenants because that’s what the other properties in LA and San Diego come with. It’s the Democrat scam

Wall Street Apes

47,016 次观看 • 1 年前

Warren Buffett was asked what he means when he says he doesn’t understand a business. His answer: “It’s not a question of understanding the product. It’s the predictability of the economics of the situation 10 years out — and that’s our problem.” ___ Buffett isn’t saying he can’t understand what a business does. He understands steel. He understands homebuilding. The product, the distribution, the customers — that’s the easy part. What he’s asking is something far more demanding: can I predict the economics of this business with reasonable confidence a decade from now? That’s an entirely different question and why most businesses fall under the “too-hard” pile for Buffett. Here’s an exercise worth trying the next time you’re reviewing a stock: Take a blank piece of paper. No spreadsheet. No model. Just write out your best estimates of what revenues, free cash flow, and earnings will look like over the next five years. Then calculate what you’re paying for the entire business today — and ask yourself honestly whether you’re being well compensated for that ownership. Your estimates will likely be off. That’s fine. That’s not the point. The point is to notice which businesses you can make confident assumptions about five years out — and which ones leave you staring at a “confused page”. That gap in confidence is exactly what Buffett is talking about. You can see an example of how to do this in Rose Celine Investments 🌹 post on $DLO ___ 🎙️ Berkshire 2000 Annual Meeting | CNBC Warren Buffett Archive (04/29/2000)
0:32

Warren Buffett was asked what he means when he says he doesn’t understand a business. His answer: “It’s not a question of understanding the product. It’s the predictability of the economics of the situation 10 years out — and that’s our problem.” ___ Buffett isn’t saying he can’t understand what a business does. He understands steel. He understands homebuilding. The product, the distribution, the customers — that’s the easy part. What he’s asking is something far more demanding: can I predict the economics of this business with reasonable confidence a decade from now? That’s an entirely different question and why most businesses fall under the “too-hard” pile for Buffett. Here’s an exercise worth trying the next time you’re reviewing a stock: Take a blank piece of paper. No spreadsheet. No model. Just write out your best estimates of what revenues, free cash flow, and earnings will look like over the next five years. Then calculate what you’re paying for the entire business today — and ask yourself honestly whether you’re being well compensated for that ownership. Your estimates will likely be off. That’s fine. That’s not the point. The point is to notice which businesses you can make confident assumptions about five years out — and which ones leave you staring at a “confused page”. That gap in confidence is exactly what Buffett is talking about. You can see an example of how to do this in Rose Celine Investments 🌹 post on $DLO ___ 🎙️ Berkshire 2000 Annual Meeting | CNBC Warren Buffett Archive (04/29/2000)

Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®

42,278 次观看 • 3 个月前

One of the main reasons why you can't afford to buy a house: The wealthy (people like Dave Ramsey) use residential real estate as a savings account. You are their cash flow. As they buy more houses than they need, the market price of real estate rises. Dave owns THOUSANDS of rental properties. He does it to collect rental income EVEN THOUGH HE HAS HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS. #Bitcoin takes attention away from real estate as an investment/savings vehicle. People like Dave want you to stay away from it so you keep working hard to buy real estate. You are his exit liquidity. You start focusing on Bitcoin = decreased demand for RE = prices go down = Dave's portfolio suffers Do you get it yet? In 10+ years when houses are selling for 0.0001 Bitcoin or less, Dave's entire portfolio will barely buy him 1 Bitcoin. He will be FORCED to sell all the homes he accumulated over the last 40 years, because real estate will no longer be profitable. This is the wealth transfer I'm looking forward to.
4:18

One of the main reasons why you can't afford to buy a house: The wealthy (people like Dave Ramsey) use residential real estate as a savings account. You are their cash flow. As they buy more houses than they need, the market price of real estate rises. Dave owns THOUSANDS of rental properties. He does it to collect rental income EVEN THOUGH HE HAS HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS. #Bitcoin takes attention away from real estate as an investment/savings vehicle. People like Dave want you to stay away from it so you keep working hard to buy real estate. You are his exit liquidity. You start focusing on Bitcoin = decreased demand for RE = prices go down = Dave's portfolio suffers Do you get it yet? In 10+ years when houses are selling for 0.0001 Bitcoin or less, Dave's entire portfolio will barely buy him 1 Bitcoin. He will be FORCED to sell all the homes he accumulated over the last 40 years, because real estate will no longer be profitable. This is the wealth transfer I'm looking forward to.

Rajat Soni, CFA

161,807 次观看 • 2 年前

This is Lev Leviev. He’s given away over $1 billion to Jewish education. People call him the King of Diamonds. But what impresses me far more than building a multibillion-dollar diamond and real estate empire is the legacy he’s built through giving. Lev has helped build more than 300 Jewish schools, along with countless synagogues and community institutions, helping revive Jewish life around the world. When I asked him the secret to his success, his answer was simple: “Do mitzvahs, and Hashem will pay you back.” He then shared how it all began. Forty-six years ago, the Lubavitcher Rebbe gave him a blessing: for every dollar he gives to support Torah, Hashem will repay him 500 times over. Lev told me he’s seen that blessing come true throughout his life. In fact, he said he experiences it every second of every minute, and that the blessing isn’t just for him. He encourages every Jew to take it upon themselves to support Torah and experience that blessing as well. A remarkable businessman. An even greater philanthropist.
1:20

This is Lev Leviev. He’s given away over $1 billion to Jewish education. People call him the King of Diamonds. But what impresses me far more than building a multibillion-dollar diamond and real estate empire is the legacy he’s built through giving. Lev has helped build more than 300 Jewish schools, along with countless synagogues and community institutions, helping revive Jewish life around the world. When I asked him the secret to his success, his answer was simple: “Do mitzvahs, and Hashem will pay you back.” He then shared how it all began. Forty-six years ago, the Lubavitcher Rebbe gave him a blessing: for every dollar he gives to support Torah, Hashem will repay him 500 times over. Lev told me he’s seen that blessing come true throughout his life. In fact, he said he experiences it every second of every minute, and that the blessing isn’t just for him. He encourages every Jew to take it upon themselves to support Torah and experience that blessing as well. A remarkable businessman. An even greater philanthropist.

Yossi Farro

18,248 次观看 • 14 天前

Paul Pierce says Evan Mobley either don’t like basketball, or he don’t like playing for Cleveland: “Because for the simple fact he’s an All-Star. He’s been an All-Star defensive player of the year. For me to look up and see he got 36 minutes. You’re not getting the ball. Go get it. You seven feet one rebound. That’s just no. Rebounding is an effort stat. Like it’s a will mindset stat. And if you don’t have the will or the mindset in the playoffs in 36 minutes to have any kind of will to get more than one rebound when you primarily play in the paint. It says so much without saying anything.” (Via No Fouls Given)
1:02

Paul Pierce says Evan Mobley either don’t like basketball, or he don’t like playing for Cleveland: “Because for the simple fact he’s an All-Star. He’s been an All-Star defensive player of the year. For me to look up and see he got 36 minutes. You’re not getting the ball. Go get it. You seven feet one rebound. That’s just no. Rebounding is an effort stat. Like it’s a will mindset stat. And if you don’t have the will or the mindset in the playoffs in 36 minutes to have any kind of will to get more than one rebound when you primarily play in the paint. It says so much without saying anything.” (Via No Fouls Given)

NBA Courtside

54,759 次观看 • 3 个月前

Putin said that plans are in place for the TurkStream and Blue Stream gas pipelines in the Black Sea to be destroyed by Ukraine. He says this because it terrifies him because it will cripple the last of Russian gas exports. He says this because he thinks that people give a fuck if we collapse the Russian economy. He also stated nuclear components are also being considered for use against Russia. He says this because he’s a fucking paranoid idiot and he’s also trying to use the nuclear narrative to scare the world about a nuclear apocalypse. No one talks about Nukes other than Russia because the treat of them is the only power they have left. The reason why he’s giving these speeches is because Ukraine has him on his fucking knees and he’s scrambling to not only stop losing the war which he has been doing for the past 4 years, but to also save Russia and his life, he knows when he loses this war his head in on a chopping block. Fuck Putin And Fuck Russia.
0:56

Putin said that plans are in place for the TurkStream and Blue Stream gas pipelines in the Black Sea to be destroyed by Ukraine. He says this because it terrifies him because it will cripple the last of Russian gas exports. He says this because he thinks that people give a fuck if we collapse the Russian economy. He also stated nuclear components are also being considered for use against Russia. He says this because he’s a fucking paranoid idiot and he’s also trying to use the nuclear narrative to scare the world about a nuclear apocalypse. No one talks about Nukes other than Russia because the treat of them is the only power they have left. The reason why he’s giving these speeches is because Ukraine has him on his fucking knees and he’s scrambling to not only stop losing the war which he has been doing for the past 4 years, but to also save Russia and his life, he knows when he loses this war his head in on a chopping block. Fuck Putin And Fuck Russia.

Bricktop_NAFO

476,913 次观看 • 5 个月前

NEW: Marc Andreessen praises Donald Trump as a world-class talent in real estate, communications, and systems thinking. "He's world-class at real estate and communications." "He's probably the first person in the world to be world-class in both things." "He very deeply understands business." "When Trump puts up one of these giant hotels, these are large-scale systems projects. There are many dimensions. A lot of things can go wrong. There's technology change. You've got to manage these hands-on because they can always go sideways." "He's world-class at thinking things through systematically." "There's this video of him talking about the water situation in California on Joe Rogan six months ago. It's one of those classic Trump things, where at the time, everybody's like, why is he going on and on about the water situation in California?" "And then, of course, LA is burning down in the last three days. And if you listen to what he talked about with the water situation in California. He is exactly 100% correct." "In the first term, when he diagnosed the German energy situation at the United Nations. He said you will become dependent on Russian energy, and that will be a disaster for you, and it has been. It was an extremely precise, accurate, and prescient five-minute analysis of this system's problem." "In my energy conversation with him, he's extremely sophisticated. The energy people that I know know that he's sophisticated. So, he wraps his head around these things very quickly and easily." Do you agree with Marc?
3:30

NEW: Marc Andreessen praises Donald Trump as a world-class talent in real estate, communications, and systems thinking. "He's world-class at real estate and communications." "He's probably the first person in the world to be world-class in both things." "He very deeply understands business." "When Trump puts up one of these giant hotels, these are large-scale systems projects. There are many dimensions. A lot of things can go wrong. There's technology change. You've got to manage these hands-on because they can always go sideways." "He's world-class at thinking things through systematically." "There's this video of him talking about the water situation in California on Joe Rogan six months ago. It's one of those classic Trump things, where at the time, everybody's like, why is he going on and on about the water situation in California?" "And then, of course, LA is burning down in the last three days. And if you listen to what he talked about with the water situation in California. He is exactly 100% correct." "In the first term, when he diagnosed the German energy situation at the United Nations. He said you will become dependent on Russian energy, and that will be a disaster for you, and it has been. It was an extremely precise, accurate, and prescient five-minute analysis of this system's problem." "In my energy conversation with him, he's extremely sophisticated. The energy people that I know know that he's sophisticated. So, he wraps his head around these things very quickly and easily." Do you agree with Marc?

KanekoaTheGreat

7,615,304 次观看 • 1 年前

Mark Carney didn’t take the job to run Canada. He took it for something far more sinister. He’s a banker who sank billions into carbon capture and the green energy scam through Brookfield. Now the whole climate grift is collapsing. Nobody believes it. Nobody wants to invest in it. So what’s he doing? He’s strip-mining Canadian assets to pay off his investors. That’s why he’s already been to Europe nine times. He’s not here to fix housing, fix the economy, or fix the mess the Liberals created. He’s here to loot what’s left so his billionaire buddies don’t take the hit. The Liberals didn’t bring him in to lead. They brought him in to finish the job — selling Canada out to global finance while pretending it’s “leadership.” This is what happens when you hand the country to a banker whose only loyalty is to his balance sheet. Carney isn’t the solution. He’s the final stage of the disease. #cdnpoli #Carney #LiberalFail #CanadaFirst #Brookfield
0:36

Mark Carney didn’t take the job to run Canada. He took it for something far more sinister. He’s a banker who sank billions into carbon capture and the green energy scam through Brookfield. Now the whole climate grift is collapsing. Nobody believes it. Nobody wants to invest in it. So what’s he doing? He’s strip-mining Canadian assets to pay off his investors. That’s why he’s already been to Europe nine times. He’s not here to fix housing, fix the economy, or fix the mess the Liberals created. He’s here to loot what’s left so his billionaire buddies don’t take the hit. The Liberals didn’t bring him in to lead. They brought him in to finish the job — selling Canada out to global finance while pretending it’s “leadership.” This is what happens when you hand the country to a banker whose only loyalty is to his balance sheet. Carney isn’t the solution. He’s the final stage of the disease. #cdnpoli #Carney #LiberalFail #CanadaFirst #Brookfield

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

74,786 次观看 • 1 个月前

I always found this #JamesBond interaction in Die another day curious. When Bond introduces himself Graves knows exactly who he is. But its only when Bond says his name that Frost realises who he is. Now i say curious because she is the one who betrayed him in North Korea, sending Zao his Photo I.D and MI6 details, so it would be safe to assume she is familiar with the man so why the shocked face only at the mention of his name an not when he approaches them?
0:46

I always found this #JamesBond interaction in Die another day curious. When Bond introduces himself Graves knows exactly who he is. But its only when Bond says his name that Frost realises who he is. Now i say curious because she is the one who betrayed him in North Korea, sending Zao his Photo I.D and MI6 details, so it would be safe to assume she is familiar with the man so why the shocked face only at the mention of his name an not when he approaches them?

Desolated Mr Bond

78,732 次观看 • 5 个月前

“After the Jake Paul fight, [Anthony Joshua] was on such a high. Last year was painful for him, coming off the defeat to Dubois... Just seeing him so happy after the Jake Paul fight, and then that happens — it’s devastating. He’s an inspiration. He really is. And that’s life. I always say, ‘This too shall pass.’ It’s one of the great sayings. People think that saying is only for when you’re having a bad time, but actually, it’s reflective on both sides of the fence. It almost feels like, being with him recently, boxing saved him — and it will probably save him again. I think he will fight on, and I think he’ll do it in their honor, but it’s not going to be easy.” Eddie Hearn gives us an update on Anthony Joshua.
2:25

“After the Jake Paul fight, [Anthony Joshua] was on such a high. Last year was painful for him, coming off the defeat to Dubois... Just seeing him so happy after the Jake Paul fight, and then that happens — it’s devastating. He’s an inspiration. He really is. And that’s life. I always say, ‘This too shall pass.’ It’s one of the great sayings. People think that saying is only for when you’re having a bad time, but actually, it’s reflective on both sides of the fence. It almost feels like, being with him recently, boxing saved him — and it will probably save him again. I think he will fight on, and I think he’ll do it in their honor, but it’s not going to be easy.” Eddie Hearn gives us an update on Anthony Joshua.

Ariel Helwani

263,661 次观看 • 6 个月前

People poked fun at Dax Harwood when he would do it but the reason why promos about fatherhood connect is because it’s a human thing that everyone can understand and relate to. It’s real. Sami told the story of his son asking him why he’s never one the world’s title last night and it was a great babyface promo. Every child assumes their big brother/older cousin/father is the best and coolest and most successful guy in their field and as the adult it creates an inherent pressure to live up to that and not disappoint them.
2:27

People poked fun at Dax Harwood when he would do it but the reason why promos about fatherhood connect is because it’s a human thing that everyone can understand and relate to. It’s real. Sami told the story of his son asking him why he’s never one the world’s title last night and it was a great babyface promo. Every child assumes their big brother/older cousin/father is the best and coolest and most successful guy in their field and as the adult it creates an inherent pressure to live up to that and not disappoint them.

Ibou, of Self Made

58,041 次观看 • 7 个月前