正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Why exercise order matters: – Do power and strength work first, before any cardio or accessory lifts – Never train to failure before these sets, fatigue makes you practice moving slower – These movements are the most neurologically demanding in your session – Coordination at max speed requires a...

78,084 次观看 • 24 天前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

John Panagopoulos, PhD 的头像
John Panagopoulos, PhD23 天前

@hubermanlab if you’re going to make claims on twitter like this, perhaps list the literature which backs this up - otherwise its just another dude’s opinion….be better

DBENWA 的头像
DBENWA24 天前

I prefer walking in the morning and weight training in the evening, then cardio on off days.

Always Learning 的头像
Always Learning24 天前

I don’t care what you say. Hard cardio first. I’m pumped and ready to go. Every other lift is easy in comparison. I don’t care what you say.

Marion S. Bitsch, Sc.D. 的头像
Marion S. Bitsch, Sc.D.24 天前

👍

Huberman Lab Clips 的头像
Huberman Lab Clips23 天前

Watch the full clip here:

sofi v, 的头像
sofi v,23 天前

Great point!

Hobbit 的头像
Hobbit24 天前

LOL matters for what

Ted Langdon 的头像
Ted Langdon24 天前

Good point. I’d add that breathing shouldn’t be reduced to “belly versus chest.” Efficient breathing involves coordinated diaphragm descent and three-dimensional expansion of the lower rib cage, including the sides and back, while avoiding unnecessary neck and shoulder tension. Like movement, breathing should also adapt to posture, activity and demand.

John Loschiavo 的头像
John Loschiavo23 天前

I’ve worried about this sort of detail before and then looked at the week and realised the bigger problem was getting both types of training done at all. If order matters for a specific goal, fine. Otherwise I’d put the thing I care about most first and move on.

Sofie l. 的头像
Sofie l.23 天前

Counterpoint: always training fresh means you never practice force production under fatigue, which is often where real-world strength matters. When do you intentionally train tired?

相关视频

Here’s EVERYTHING you need to know about warm up sets: Most people are doing warm up sets ALL wrong and they’re costing themselves from an efficiency/effectiveness standpoint as a result Warm ups are designed to A) guard against injury B) prepare you for your working sets Warm up sets should NEVER be taken in close proximity to failure…most should see you leaving 6, 7, 8+ reps in reserve (the lone exception to this = sets performed for 1-2 reps @ ~90+ of your intended working weight) This is in STARK CONTRAST to working sets which should all end around 0-2 RIR You probably need about ~2 warm up sets before your first exercise or two depending on the specifics of your programming Here is an example of a typical warm up protocol: - a 5-10 minute brisk walk on the treadmill (optional) - 50% of your working weight on your first exercise for ~12 reps (mandatory) - 75% of your working weight on your first exercise for ~6 reps (mandatory) - 90% of your working weight on your first exercise for ~2 reps (optional) After you complete the working sets for your first exercise, you may want to repeat the last 3 steps prior to performing your next exercise IF it is an antagonist exercise (Ex: Lat Pull-Down after Sternal Pecs Machine Press OR Seated Leg Curls after Hack Squats) After that, you probably don’t need any additional warm up sets unless you are just using them as “primers” (sets to make sure your movement pattern / the machine settings / etc. are on point) - If doing a PUSH workout, I’m probably using 2-3 warm up sets before my first exercise only (assuming it’s a multi joint movement) - If doing a PULL workout, I’m probably using 2-3 warm up sets before my first exercise only (assuming it’s a multi joint movement) - If doing an UPPER workout, I’m probably using 2-3 warm up sets before my first exercise and 1-2 warm up sets before my second exercise (assuming they’re antagonist multi joint movements) - If doing an LOWER workout, I’m probably using 2-3 warm up sets before my first exercise and 1-2 warm up sets before my second exercise (assuming they’re antagonist multi joint movements) - If doing a FULL BODY workout, I’m probably using 2-3 warm up sets before my first exercise, 1-2 warm up sets before my second exercise, and may even 1-2 warm up sets before my third and fourth exercises as well (assuming they’re all multi joint movements — antagonist push/pull movements for both upper & lower) (As you can see, the major downside of FULL BODY workouts is often the excess warm up time needed — this is why they work best for beginners much of the time) General rule of thumb: If your first set of an exercise is NOT your best set of that exercise in terms of performance (assuming we equate RIR), you are NOT warming up properly You should see a fall off in performance as sets transpire on a given exercise…this is a feature, not a bug of productive/effective resistance exercise WHEN WARMED UP PROPERLY

Dean Turner

49,107 次观看 • 1 个月前

Here’s EVERYTHING you need to know about warm up sets: Most people are doing warm up sets ALL wrong and they’re costing themselves from an efficiency/effectiveness standpoint as a result Warm ups are designed to A) guard against injury B) prepare you for your working sets Warm up sets should NEVER be taken in close proximity to failure…most should see you leaving 6, 7, 8+ reps in reserve (the lone exception to this = sets performed for 1-2 reps @ ~90+ of your intended working weight) This is in STARK CONTRAST to working sets which should all end around 0-2 RIR You probably need about ~2 warm up sets before your first exercise or two depending on the specifics of your programming Here is an example of a typical warm up protocol: - a 5-10 minute brisk walk on the treadmill (optional) - 50% of your working weight on your first exercise for ~12 reps (mandatory) - 75% of your working weight on your first exercise for ~6 reps (mandatory) - 90% of your working weight on your first exercise for ~2 reps (optional) After you complete the working sets for your first exercise, you may want to repeat the last 3 steps prior to performing your next exercise IF it is an antagonist exercise (Ex: Lat Pull-Down after Sternal Pecs Machine Press OR Seated Leg Curls after Hack Squats) After that, you probably don’t need any additional warm up sets unless you are just using them as “primers” (sets to make sure your movement pattern / the machine settings / etc. are on point) - If doing a PUSH workout, I’m probably using 2-3 warm up sets before my first exercise only (assuming it’s a multi joint movement) - If doing a PULL workout, I’m probably using 2-3 warm up sets before my first exercise only (assuming it’s a multi joint movement) - If doing an UPPER workout, I’m probably using 2-3 warm up sets before my first exercise and 1-2 warm up sets before my second exercise (assuming they’re antagonist multi joint movements) - If doing an LOWER workout, I’m probably using 2-3 warm up sets before my first exercise and 1-2 warm up sets before my second exercise (assuming they’re antagonist multi joint movements) - If doing a FULL BODY workout, I’m probably using 2-3 warm up sets before my first exercise, 1-2 warm up sets before my second exercise, and may even 1-2 warm up sets before my third and fourth exercises as well (assuming they’re all multi joint movements — antagonist push/pull movements for both upper & lower) (As you can see, the major downside of FULL BODY workouts is often the excess warm up time needed — this is why they work best for beginners much of the time) General rule of thumb: If your first set of an exercise is NOT your best set of that exercise in terms of performance (assuming we equate RIR), you are NOT warming up properly You should see a fall off in performance as sets transpire on a given exercise…this is a feature, not a bug of productive/effective resistance exercise WHEN WARMED UP PROPERLY

Dean Turner

53,653 次观看 • 6 个月前

Deadly Strength Sins Most lifters don’t need more information. They need fewer stupid detours. Here are the biggest mistakes keeping people weak, beat up, and stuck. MAJORING IN MINORS Chasing big lifts but treating skull crushers like the Super Bowl? Been there. Blew up my elbows years ago acting like assistance work was the main event. Assistance lifts support the foundation. They are not the foundation. The squat, bench, deadlift, carries, presses, rows: That’s the meat and potatoes. Cable kickbacks are seasoning. MOVEMENT INTENTION You are not sculpting delts during a 700-pound squat. Core lifts are about moving heavy weight from Point A to Point B: Fast. Clean. Violent. Efficient. Save the slow squeeze-and-feel bodybuilding mindset for curls, laterals, and cable crossovers. Heavy training requires aggressive intent. HIGH REPS FOR MAX STRENGTH Running marathons will not improve your 40-yard dash. Same idea with endless 20-rep sets building a huge 1RM. Technique changes under maximal strain. The bar path changes. The timing changes. Your body changes. A warm-up at 50% does not teach you how to survive 90%. If maximal strength is the goal: Lift heavy. 85%+. Low reps. Specific intent. Specificity beats sweat equity. WARM-UPS Want to get better at squatting? Warm up by squatting. Light weight. Perfect reps. Explosive intent. Groove the pattern. Wake up the nervous system. Build the fire before the heavy sets arrive. Specificity is king. EXERCISE ORDER Train your priority first. Period. You do not pre-fatigue your nervous system with fluff then expect greatness under a heavy bar. Fresh mind. Fresh body. Main lift first. FINAL THOUGHTS Getting strong is not complicated. The problem is lifters drown in noise. Fancy exercises. Circus tricks. Random workouts. Endless novelty. Meanwhile the strongest people in the world keep hammering the basics with intent, consistency, and progression. Lift with purpose. Prioritize core lifts. Do not let fancy fluff neuter your progress. Locked, loaded, and ready.

Josh Bryant

35,973 次观看 • 4 个月前

Do you need to train heavy to build muscle? 💪 For years the mantra was you need to go heavy to build muscle. Or you needed to go heavy to stimulate large type II fast twitch fibers but go light for more reps to stimulate smaller type I fibers. But new research has challenged that dogma. Several meta-analysis have shown similar muscle growth with low loads vs high loads when set number is matched & proximity to failure is similar (PMIDs: 28834797, 35015560, 33312275, & 33433148). While muscle hypertrophy was not different between high and low load training, strength increased significantly more with high load training in all these meta-analysis As far as targeting fiber types, it becomes kind of irrelevant when you take an exercise close to failure because fiber types tend to be recruited in order from smallest to largest. So with high load training, small & large fibers get recruited quickly but you don’t do many reps. With low load training, you initially recruit smaller fibers but as the muscle fatigues it is forced to recruit the larger fibers as the exercise is taken close to failure. The net effect is that taking sets close to failure with high or low loads produces a lot of muscle activation and similar hypetrophy The take home is, do what you enjoy if muscle growth is the goal. Just make sure you train HARD & go close to failure (within a few reps) & do enough total sets. But if strength is a priority you’ll need to train heavy & be careful going to failure as it can impair strength gains From my first conversation with Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.

Layne Norton, PhD

53,312 次观看 • 2 年前

What people don't appreciate is that what's maintained the international system and the US position in that system are the middle powers as principal stakeholders, and that's because they perceive the current system as the best one for them. If their perception of America's role and its intentions changes, then the U.S. no longer has a great argument for why these middle powers should support them on different issues. America then becomes just another powerful state; the most powerful state, but one that is both pursuing interests and is using its power more coercively, which you've seen at least in the last month. And so very quickly, we will begin to generate antibodies in the system and coalitions against us on different issues. And we will quickly discover that the reason why the system has endured, why unipolarity has endured and why America's position has endured, is not because we have so many carrier strike groups; it's not because of military power. It's because most countries, although they publicly don't like to admit it, are stakeholders in the system and they see it as the best system for them compared to a bipolar or a multipolar world order. That's the reality. Usually when they say multi polar world order, what they mean is one that's more multilateral with greater room, greater opportunities for smaller states and middle powers. And that's fair. But what they don't mean is that they're all staying up at night and saying, you know, we wish that Saudi Arabia, Russia, maybe Iran and Turkey had a lot more power than they do right now. Because if you ask who would be the powers in the multipolar world system, it's usually not the countries that people want. And so, this kind of will be my closing argument that I think some folks in the U. S. are very short sighted and misunderstand the genuine sources of U. S. power and our position and what keeps it in the international order and what maintains it. And if you pull that thread, you will quickly start unraveling something and you will have an epiphany afterwards on what the order is really based on. — Michael Kofman

Demetri Kofinas

16,844 次观看 • 1 年前

Comment "RIZZ,” or visit my profile to try the free daily challenge. First things first. Respect for making the approach. Most guys never even get to this point. But here's what went wrong and why she rejected him. Approaching from behind startled her. And the second someone feels startled their nervous system goes into defense mode. She's not thinking about whether she's attracted to you. She's thinking about whether she's safe. You lost her before you said a single word. Always approach from the front or the side. Give her the chance to see you coming. That alone changes the entire energy of the interaction. The second mistake was over validating her. Telling a woman she's beautiful before she's said a single word puts her on a pedestal. Now she knows you want her approval before she's done anything to earn your interest. That's not attractive. That's validation she didn't work for. Lead with genuine curiosity instead. Make her feel interesting not just pretty. The approach itself took courage. The execution just needed work. And that's exactly what practice is for. Not every approach is going to land. But every approach teaches you something if you're paying attention. That's why I built a tool that lets you practice these exact scenarios in real time and get scored on what's actually working and what's not. So when you approach for real you've already made the mistakes somewhere it doesn't count. Comment "RIZZ" and I'll send you the free daily challenge right now.

Wolfmancamm

24,531 次观看 • 4 个月前