正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Why Indians Ate Food in Silence | Ancient Indian Eating Science Explained #ancientindiaWhether it was a home or a gurukul, ancient Indians followed one strict rule while eating — silence. It wasn’t discipline. It wasn’t fear. It was body science. In this video, we uncover why our ancestors believed...

43,356 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Priyanka Chopra tested her knowledge of Indian culture and origins, scoring 10 out of 16 questions (62.5%), despite having lived in the United States for nearly two decades. Question: Chai tea latte. Priyanka Chopra: Chai is Indian, but "chai tea" is non-Indian because chai already means tea. Saying chai tea is like saying "tea tea." She jokes that she prefers espresso over chai. Question: Yoga pants. Priyanka Chopra: Yoga is Indian, but yoga pants are not. She jokes that they probably came from Lululemon in Los Angeles. Question: Chess. Priyanka Chopra: Chess is Indian. She explains it is called "shatranj" and admits she knows how to play but usually loses. Question: Snakes and Ladders. Priyanka Chopra: Correctly identifies it as Indian and talks about growing up playing it. She also shares her family's recent obsession with Ludo. Question: Chicken tikka masala. Priyanka Chopra: Says it is not originally Indian and recalls that it originated in Glasgow, Scotland, after British adaptations of Indian flavors. Question: Butter chicken. Priyanka Chopra: Defends it passionately, saying, "Don't take that from us." She explains it comes from North India and praises the famous Delhi restaurant Bukhara. Question: Samosa. Priyanka Chopra: Initially suspects a trick question and learns samosas were introduced to India from the Middle East in the 13th century. She jokes that after so many centuries, samosas are basically Indian. Question: Ghee. Priyanka Chopra: Strongly claims ghee as Indian and shares memories of her grandmother feeding her spoonfuls of it. She calls ghee rice with a little salt one of her favorite comfort foods. Question: Homeopathic medicine. Priyanka Chopra: Notes that homeopathy is widely used in India but correctly guesses it originated in Europe, later learning it came from Germany. Question: The decimal system. Priyanka Chopra: Immediately identifies it as Indian, mentioning that zero was invented in India and joking, "We've always been good at math." Question: Ayurveda. Priyanka Chopra: Explains that Ayurveda is an ancient Indian system of medicine based on natural remedies and says she has personally explored Ayurvedic practices and products.

Pie Rsquare 📊

269,118 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Truth About Eating: Why Three Meals a Day Is a Modern Lie Most people don’t realize it, but the idea of eating three meals a day was not born from nature or tradition. It was engineered—by the Rockefeller Foundation, as part of a broader system designed to reshape how we consume, think, and live. Our ancestors didn’t sit down to breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day. For many, eating three times a week was a luxury. The human body is built to thrive in a fasted state. When you sleep, your body heals—not because you’re resting, but because you’re fasting. Without food to digest, your energy is redirected toward repair, regeneration, and recovery. That’s why fasting isn’t just a trend; it’s a biological imperative. When you feel sick, the instinct is often to seek out a doctor in a white coat. But how much do they really know about the body’s innate healing mechanisms? Instead of rushing to a clinic, consider this: a 36-hour fast can activate your stem cells. These cells travel to areas of injury, targeting inflammation and promoting healing from within. The modern food system wants you dependent—on processed meals, on constant snacking, on the illusion that you need to eat all day to survive. Obesity isn’t natural; it’s installed. It’s the result of a system designed to keep you fat, lazy, and reliant on their products. Your body is not broken. It’s meant to fast. It’s meant to heal. And it’s time to reclaim that power.

Camus

79,580 次观看 • 8 个月前

Whenever we talk about traditional Indian knowledge system, there is an elephant in the room we often shy from addressing. Why does Vrikshayurveda - a corpus of plant science older than almost any living intellectual tradition - still have to justify its existence every time it enters a room? Why, after thirty centuries of farmers using neem, does India hold no position of leadership in neem research? Why, when a tribal community in Andhra Pradesh is using 420 species of medicinal plants with documented efficacy, does the nearest IIT estimate ten years and twenty lakhs INR (~21K USD) per plant per application to validate what farmers have already spent generations refining? In my podcast with AV Balasubramanian (AVB), we explored many of these gnarly questions. AV Balasubramanian is one of the leading pioneers of deploying the wisdom of Vrikshayurveda in Indian Agriculture. He is the co-founder of the Centre for Indian Knowledge Systems (CIKS) in Chennai, one, besides conserving 170+ traditional rice varieties, of the most serious institutional efforts to apply Vrikshayurveda -- the classical Indian science of plant health - to modern day challenges in sustainable agriculture. His background is unusual even by the standards of people who do unusual things. A biochemistry and biophysics training at premier Indian institutions, a PhD abandoned in the US in 1982 in favour of a deep interest in exploring Science rooted in the Indian tradition, a decade as a student and teacher of Yoga at Krishnamacharya Yoga Mandiram under the direct lineage of T. Krishnamacharya and T.K.V. Desikachar, and eventually a decades-long collaboration with the Patriotic and People-Oriented Science and Technology (PPST) group, the intellectual collective that, more than any other, attempted to recover the epistemological foundations of Indian science rather than merely its recipes. AVB could have made a career from positioning traditional knowledge as a cultural heritage to be preserved. He didn’t. He has made a career of asking whether it works, under what conditions, for which problems, and how to scale it. His field team used a principle from Vrikshayurveda -- that bitter taste is an indicator of pesticidal potential -- to crack a fruit-and-shoot borer problem on brinjal that neem had failed to solve. His experiments with Ayurvedic storage forms (arkas, thailas, arishtas) have demonstrated that shelf life -- the most commonly cited limitation of natural bioprotectants -- is a solvable problem, using technology the Ayurvedic drug industry has operated for over a century. It’s unalloyed joy to hear when AVB speaks. He speaks with scientific precision (while warning of the dangers of epistemic fascism) and carries his passion for Indian knowledge system with a scientist’s penchant for rigor. What made this conversation personal was not just the fact that he studied Yoga under the same lineage I have been studying since 2013. It was our shared love and passion for Indian Knowledge systems. In the first part of this wide-ranging chat, AVB and I engage in philosophical throat clearing, exploring the context of Vrikshayurveda, before engaging with the the content of Vrikshayurveda. I started off the dialogue with a fundamental question. Traditional Indian medical and philosophical frameworks seem to rest on categories like vata, pitta, kapha that have not changed in millennia. A modern scientist looking at that would say: if your categories never change, is it really science? In response, AVB shared a beautiful analogy he had read from Captain Srinivasa Murthy. Imagine you make a list of every group that has tried to invade or conquer India over thirty centuries. You can list them in chronological order -- Greeks, Turks, Arabs, Portuguese, British, and so on. Or you can classify them differently: those who came by land, those who came by sea, those who came by air. The second classification not only subsumes everything that happened in the past but is capable of accommodating anything in the future. An Ayurvedic physician examining a patient is doing exactly this. When he looks at a complex of symptoms and asks whether the primary doshic imbalance is vata, pitta, or kapha, he is using a classification scheme that exhausts the universe of discourse.

Venky Ramachandran

27,134 次观看 • 3 个月前