正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Joe Rogan asked David Sinclair: If one meal a day is so effective, why not just eat smaller meals multiple times instead? Sinclair’s answer cuts deep: Our bodies evolved over millions of years in environments full of adversity — hunger, scarcity, survival. We’ve removed that stress because it feels...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

462,370 subscribers

484,467 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生教育科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

David Sinclair explained why one meal a day might beat constant snacking. Our bodies evolved for periods of hunger in the wild. Constant eating tells your system “everything’s fine, no need to fight aging.” But going longer without food flips on longevity genes that repair and protect you. It’s one of those simple ideas that feels counterintuitive at first but makes a lot of sense when you think about human history. In a world of endless food availability, strategically building in hunger could be one of the most powerful tools we have for long-term health and resilience. What’s your experience with one meal a day or extended fasting?
2:14

David Sinclair explained why one meal a day might beat constant snacking. Our bodies evolved for periods of hunger in the wild. Constant eating tells your system “everything’s fine, no need to fight aging.” But going longer without food flips on longevity genes that repair and protect you. It’s one of those simple ideas that feels counterintuitive at first but makes a lot of sense when you think about human history. In a world of endless food availability, strategically building in hunger could be one of the most powerful tools we have for long-term health and resilience. What’s your experience with one meal a day or extended fasting?

Camus

81,497 次观看 • 2 个月前

David Sinclair’s #1 anti-aging hack: Skip a meal or two every day. He’s on one-meal-a-day and says he got his 20-year-old body back, feels sharper, sleeps better, and has steady energy. Fasting flips on the same longevity genes (like sirtuins) our ancestors used to survive hard times. His tip: Don’t go cold turkey. Give it at least two weeks, your body adapts and the hunger fades. Multiple studies (including human trials) show time-restricted eating and intermittent fasting improve metabolic health, insulin sensitivity, reduce inflammation, and activate cellular repair (autophagy). Animal studies link it to longer lifespan, while human data supports better markers of biological age. What’s your take, could skipping one meal a day be one of the highest-leverage things you can do for longevity?
2:55

David Sinclair’s #1 anti-aging hack: Skip a meal or two every day. He’s on one-meal-a-day and says he got his 20-year-old body back, feels sharper, sleeps better, and has steady energy. Fasting flips on the same longevity genes (like sirtuins) our ancestors used to survive hard times. His tip: Don’t go cold turkey. Give it at least two weeks, your body adapts and the hunger fades. Multiple studies (including human trials) show time-restricted eating and intermittent fasting improve metabolic health, insulin sensitivity, reduce inflammation, and activate cellular repair (autophagy). Animal studies link it to longer lifespan, while human data supports better markers of biological age. What’s your take, could skipping one meal a day be one of the highest-leverage things you can do for longevity?

Camus

42,824 次观看 • 2 个月前

Your comfort is aging you. And your biology can prove it. Dr. David Sinclair put it plainly: "People who exercise and eat less have a slower-ticking clock. It's a fact." The longevity genes in your body only activate when your cells perceive adversity. Hunger. Exertion. Cold. The moment your cells sense abundance, they stand down. Defenses off. The clock runs faster. Modern life engineered away every signal the body evolved to receive. Always fed. Always warm. Always sitting. The body was never designed to be comfortable. It was designed to be resilient. And resilience requires pressure to stay active. Skip a meal. Push the muscle. Let the cold in. Every one of those signals tells your cells to tighten up, repair, defend. Without them, the machinery idles. And idle machinery rusts. The uncomfortable truth is that the things most people optimize their lives to avoid are the exact inputs their biology is waiting for. Follow Goku for more on the science of living longer, explained plainly.
3:20

Your comfort is aging you. And your biology can prove it. Dr. David Sinclair put it plainly: "People who exercise and eat less have a slower-ticking clock. It's a fact." The longevity genes in your body only activate when your cells perceive adversity. Hunger. Exertion. Cold. The moment your cells sense abundance, they stand down. Defenses off. The clock runs faster. Modern life engineered away every signal the body evolved to receive. Always fed. Always warm. Always sitting. The body was never designed to be comfortable. It was designed to be resilient. And resilience requires pressure to stay active. Skip a meal. Push the muscle. Let the cold in. Every one of those signals tells your cells to tighten up, repair, defend. Without them, the machinery idles. And idle machinery rusts. The uncomfortable truth is that the things most people optimize their lives to avoid are the exact inputs their biology is waiting for. Follow Goku for more on the science of living longer, explained plainly.

Goku

54,219 次观看 • 4 个月前

Fasting is Not Healthy But you’ve heard it cures everything right? Well there are many reasons why fasting might not be the best move for you trying to restore your health Telling the old grandma who cannot make it up the stairs to “just fast for the autophagy and repair” is asinine Well how do you repair? With nutrients, from eating. The issue here is that most people are eating trash and if they are eating animal foods they’re cooking or pasteurizing it - negating a lot of the nutrients inside. If your body can’t get what it needs to fulfil the constant repair and healing process, it’ll begin to break itself down. A constant flow diet of raw animal foods is the best thing you can do for healing, especially when done from a place of depletion. As always, there are exceptions like spiritual reasons or to challenge oneself - but in general in our society of poor health I think the focus should be on eating more better foods, not eating nothing.
1:52

Fasting is Not Healthy But you’ve heard it cures everything right? Well there are many reasons why fasting might not be the best move for you trying to restore your health Telling the old grandma who cannot make it up the stairs to “just fast for the autophagy and repair” is asinine Well how do you repair? With nutrients, from eating. The issue here is that most people are eating trash and if they are eating animal foods they’re cooking or pasteurizing it - negating a lot of the nutrients inside. If your body can’t get what it needs to fulfil the constant repair and healing process, it’ll begin to break itself down. A constant flow diet of raw animal foods is the best thing you can do for healing, especially when done from a place of depletion. As always, there are exceptions like spiritual reasons or to challenge oneself - but in general in our society of poor health I think the focus should be on eating more better foods, not eating nothing.

⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬

217,481 次观看 • 1 年前

A Harvard professor who's studied aging for 30 years says one of the most powerful longevity tools on Earth is free. Fasting. David Sinclair explained what happens at the cellular level when you stop eating food for long periods of time: Your body has proteins called sirtuins. They're the conductors of your cellular orchestra - telling each gene when to turn on and off, keeping every cell's identity intact. But sirtuins need fuel called NAD to function. By age 50, your NAD levels drop by HALF. Your conductors are running on empty. Your cells start losing their identity. Fasting raises NAD back up. It reactivates the sirtuins and preserves the epigenome. Sinclair mentions it's only useful if you're already meeting nutrient and micronutrient intake as well. He himself skips breakfast daily and tries to go until late afternoon before eating. Once a month, he fasts for 3 full days because deep cellular recycling - called chaperone-mediated autophagy - only kicks in after about 2 and a half to 3 days. He called three meals a day "craziness" and said the idea that breakfast is the most important meal of the day was "marketing from the early 20th century" by cereal companies. Fasting is just one of the strategies he uses for optimal health. — David Sinclair
1:36

A Harvard professor who's studied aging for 30 years says one of the most powerful longevity tools on Earth is free. Fasting. David Sinclair explained what happens at the cellular level when you stop eating food for long periods of time: Your body has proteins called sirtuins. They're the conductors of your cellular orchestra - telling each gene when to turn on and off, keeping every cell's identity intact. But sirtuins need fuel called NAD to function. By age 50, your NAD levels drop by HALF. Your conductors are running on empty. Your cells start losing their identity. Fasting raises NAD back up. It reactivates the sirtuins and preserves the epigenome. Sinclair mentions it's only useful if you're already meeting nutrient and micronutrient intake as well. He himself skips breakfast daily and tries to go until late afternoon before eating. Once a month, he fasts for 3 full days because deep cellular recycling - called chaperone-mediated autophagy - only kicks in after about 2 and a half to 3 days. He called three meals a day "craziness" and said the idea that breakfast is the most important meal of the day was "marketing from the early 20th century" by cereal companies. Fasting is just one of the strategies he uses for optimal health. — David Sinclair

John Cumbers

231,590 次观看 • 4 个月前

The Truth About Eating: Why Three Meals a Day Is a Modern Lie Most people don’t realize it, but the idea of eating three meals a day was not born from nature or tradition. It was engineered—by the Rockefeller Foundation, as part of a broader system designed to reshape how we consume, think, and live. Our ancestors didn’t sit down to breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day. For many, eating three times a week was a luxury. The human body is built to thrive in a fasted state. When you sleep, your body heals—not because you’re resting, but because you’re fasting. Without food to digest, your energy is redirected toward repair, regeneration, and recovery. That’s why fasting isn’t just a trend; it’s a biological imperative. When you feel sick, the instinct is often to seek out a doctor in a white coat. But how much do they really know about the body’s innate healing mechanisms? Instead of rushing to a clinic, consider this: a 36-hour fast can activate your stem cells. These cells travel to areas of injury, targeting inflammation and promoting healing from within. The modern food system wants you dependent—on processed meals, on constant snacking, on the illusion that you need to eat all day to survive. Obesity isn’t natural; it’s installed. It’s the result of a system designed to keep you fat, lazy, and reliant on their products. Your body is not broken. It’s meant to fast. It’s meant to heal. And it’s time to reclaim that power.
1:00

The Truth About Eating: Why Three Meals a Day Is a Modern Lie Most people don’t realize it, but the idea of eating three meals a day was not born from nature or tradition. It was engineered—by the Rockefeller Foundation, as part of a broader system designed to reshape how we consume, think, and live. Our ancestors didn’t sit down to breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day. For many, eating three times a week was a luxury. The human body is built to thrive in a fasted state. When you sleep, your body heals—not because you’re resting, but because you’re fasting. Without food to digest, your energy is redirected toward repair, regeneration, and recovery. That’s why fasting isn’t just a trend; it’s a biological imperative. When you feel sick, the instinct is often to seek out a doctor in a white coat. But how much do they really know about the body’s innate healing mechanisms? Instead of rushing to a clinic, consider this: a 36-hour fast can activate your stem cells. These cells travel to areas of injury, targeting inflammation and promoting healing from within. The modern food system wants you dependent—on processed meals, on constant snacking, on the illusion that you need to eat all day to survive. Obesity isn’t natural; it’s installed. It’s the result of a system designed to keep you fat, lazy, and reliant on their products. Your body is not broken. It’s meant to fast. It’s meant to heal. And it’s time to reclaim that power.

Camus

79,580 次观看 • 9 个月前

When Andrew Huberman asked about the root cause of aging, Dr. David Sinclair gave a surprisingly simple answer: "Aging is a loss of information in the same way you try to copy a cassette tape, or even if you send information across the internet, some of it will get lost." There are two types of information our bodies carry: "There is the genetic information, which is digital — A, T, C, G, the chemical letters of DNA. But there's this other part of the information in the body that's just as important, it's essential, in fact, and that's the systems that control which genes are switched on and off." And when it comes to which one matters more for how long and how well you live, the answer isn't even close: — David Sinclair
2:35

When Andrew Huberman asked about the root cause of aging, Dr. David Sinclair gave a surprisingly simple answer: "Aging is a loss of information in the same way you try to copy a cassette tape, or even if you send information across the internet, some of it will get lost." There are two types of information our bodies carry: "There is the genetic information, which is digital — A, T, C, G, the chemical letters of DNA. But there's this other part of the information in the body that's just as important, it's essential, in fact, and that's the systems that control which genes are switched on and off." And when it comes to which one matters more for how long and how well you live, the answer isn't even close: — David Sinclair

John Cumbers

305,874 次观看 • 5 个月前

Dr. Pradip Jamnadas gave the simplest, most powerful longevity hack most people ignore: “If you just want to be healthy, stay disease-free, avoid diabetes and modern illnesses—eat once a day, or at most twice a day in a 6–8 hour window.” That’s it. No complicated diets. No endless calorie counting. Practical example he gave: Lunch at 1 PM → dinner at 6–7 PM → nothing else. Zero snacking in between. Why? Every snack spikes insulin, breaks the fast, stops ketogenesis, and keeps your body in constant storage mode instead of repair mode. Time-restricted eating (once or twice a day) = general maintenance + fat loss + metabolic reset. If you tried eating only once or twice a day in a tight window… how many days did you last—and how did you feel?
0:50

Dr. Pradip Jamnadas gave the simplest, most powerful longevity hack most people ignore: “If you just want to be healthy, stay disease-free, avoid diabetes and modern illnesses—eat once a day, or at most twice a day in a 6–8 hour window.” That’s it. No complicated diets. No endless calorie counting. Practical example he gave: Lunch at 1 PM → dinner at 6–7 PM → nothing else. Zero snacking in between. Why? Every snack spikes insulin, breaks the fast, stops ketogenesis, and keeps your body in constant storage mode instead of repair mode. Time-restricted eating (once or twice a day) = general maintenance + fat loss + metabolic reset. If you tried eating only once or twice a day in a tight window… how many days did you last—and how did you feel?

Camus

48,162 次观看 • 6 个月前

Joe Rogan is stunned by a theory that could completely rewrite human history: an advanced civilization may have existed LONG before recorded history. ROGAN: “There was a very advanced civilization that existed on Earth tens of thousands of years ago.” ROGAN: “We were probably wiped out by a comet impact, and what we have today is a rebuild of civilization.” ROGAN: “There’s not a linear progression from caveman to us.” ROGAN: “When you look at the Sumerian kings list, it gets very weird because there’s kings that reign for thousands of years.” ROGAN: “And then you have the flood. After the flood, the age of these people drops pretty dramatically.” ROGAN: “Is this just myth? Poor recordkeeping? Or had they achieved something we don’t understand?” ROGAN: “They had achieved incredibly complex structures like the pyramids.” ROGAN: “How did they move these 500-ton stones from hundreds of miles away? We don’t really know.” ROGAN: “Had they also gotten involved in genetic engineering?” ROGAN: “Had they figured out a way to extend lifespan?” Then Sinclair takes the idea even further. SINCLAIR: “Imagine if you had 500 years to do research, not just 57 years.” SINCLAIR: “Imagine if you could continue learning and growing.” SINCLAIR: “You would get so much done.” SINCLAIR: “The exponential increase in technological innovation that we would have in this society would be absolutely mind-blowing.” SINCLAIR: “If we do have extension of human lifespan… how will you think about your life if being 100 is still your prime?” SINCLAIR: “You might have multiple lifetimes, multiple marriages, multiple families.” SINCLAIR: “That will happen. It’s not really a question of if anymore.”
5:13

Joe Rogan is stunned by a theory that could completely rewrite human history: an advanced civilization may have existed LONG before recorded history. ROGAN: “There was a very advanced civilization that existed on Earth tens of thousands of years ago.” ROGAN: “We were probably wiped out by a comet impact, and what we have today is a rebuild of civilization.” ROGAN: “There’s not a linear progression from caveman to us.” ROGAN: “When you look at the Sumerian kings list, it gets very weird because there’s kings that reign for thousands of years.” ROGAN: “And then you have the flood. After the flood, the age of these people drops pretty dramatically.” ROGAN: “Is this just myth? Poor recordkeeping? Or had they achieved something we don’t understand?” ROGAN: “They had achieved incredibly complex structures like the pyramids.” ROGAN: “How did they move these 500-ton stones from hundreds of miles away? We don’t really know.” ROGAN: “Had they also gotten involved in genetic engineering?” ROGAN: “Had they figured out a way to extend lifespan?” Then Sinclair takes the idea even further. SINCLAIR: “Imagine if you had 500 years to do research, not just 57 years.” SINCLAIR: “Imagine if you could continue learning and growing.” SINCLAIR: “You would get so much done.” SINCLAIR: “The exponential increase in technological innovation that we would have in this society would be absolutely mind-blowing.” SINCLAIR: “If we do have extension of human lifespan… how will you think about your life if being 100 is still your prime?” SINCLAIR: “You might have multiple lifetimes, multiple marriages, multiple families.” SINCLAIR: “That will happen. It’s not really a question of if anymore.”

gomi

121,550 次观看 • 16 天前

Longevity expert says it's not bad parenting to let kids stay hungry WILLIAMSON: "What common health advice today do you think people will laugh at in 50 years time?" SINCLAIR: "Yeah, I think that eating three meals and snacking—you go to the supermarket and there's health bars down the whole aisle that you're supposed to never be hungry. That's going to be seen as extremely toxic. Your body needs to feel hungry sometimes. Have a break from food." "So this trend of you're a bad parent if your child feels hunger is going to be looked at like, 'Oh, what were we doing to our kids?'"
0:40

Longevity expert says it's not bad parenting to let kids stay hungry WILLIAMSON: "What common health advice today do you think people will laugh at in 50 years time?" SINCLAIR: "Yeah, I think that eating three meals and snacking—you go to the supermarket and there's health bars down the whole aisle that you're supposed to never be hungry. That's going to be seen as extremely toxic. Your body needs to feel hungry sometimes. Have a break from food." "So this trend of you're a bad parent if your child feels hunger is going to be looked at like, 'Oh, what were we doing to our kids?'"

Tony Jacob | FindaClip.com

332,908 次观看 • 2 天前

Dr. David Sinclair said something to Prof Andrew Huberman that left me thinking... "Your cells are forgetting who they are." That is not a metaphor. That is the biological mechanism behind aging itself. Dr. David Sinclair then explained how it works... Every cell in your body carries the same DNA. A nerve cell and a skin cell are genetically identical. What makes them different is which genes are switched on and which are kept silent. That system of switches is called the epigenome. Think of DNA as a music library. The epigenome is the playlist. Each cell plays a specific set of songs. As long as every cell plays the right playlist, the body works perfectly. Aging is what happens when the playlists get corrupted. Genes that should stay silent start activating in the wrong cells. The cell loses its identity. It forgets what it was built to do. And according to Dr. David Sinclair, that single process is the root cause of heart disease, Alzheimer's, and most cancers. Not separate problems. The same problem, showing up in different places. The part that stopped me cold was what comes after that. If aging is information loss, it can be reversed by restoring the information. Dr. David Sinclair's lab has already done this in animals. When they restored the epigenetic signals, the cells remembered what they were. The aging reversed. Huberman asked whether the diseases go away too. Dr. David Sinclair did not hedge. " If you turn the clock back in tissues, those diseases go away." Every generation inherits assumptions about what the body can and cannot do. This one just changed. Follow @YourDocGoku for the science rewriting what we thought was permanent. David Sinclair
2:59

Dr. David Sinclair said something to Prof Andrew Huberman that left me thinking... "Your cells are forgetting who they are." That is not a metaphor. That is the biological mechanism behind aging itself. Dr. David Sinclair then explained how it works... Every cell in your body carries the same DNA. A nerve cell and a skin cell are genetically identical. What makes them different is which genes are switched on and which are kept silent. That system of switches is called the epigenome. Think of DNA as a music library. The epigenome is the playlist. Each cell plays a specific set of songs. As long as every cell plays the right playlist, the body works perfectly. Aging is what happens when the playlists get corrupted. Genes that should stay silent start activating in the wrong cells. The cell loses its identity. It forgets what it was built to do. And according to Dr. David Sinclair, that single process is the root cause of heart disease, Alzheimer's, and most cancers. Not separate problems. The same problem, showing up in different places. The part that stopped me cold was what comes after that. If aging is information loss, it can be reversed by restoring the information. Dr. David Sinclair's lab has already done this in animals. When they restored the epigenetic signals, the cells remembered what they were. The aging reversed. Huberman asked whether the diseases go away too. Dr. David Sinclair did not hedge. " If you turn the clock back in tissues, those diseases go away." Every generation inherits assumptions about what the body can and cannot do. This one just changed. Follow @YourDocGoku for the science rewriting what we thought was permanent. David Sinclair

Goku

32,589 次观看 • 5 个月前

I’ve lost 138 pounds. Reversed my insulin resistance, high blood pressure, sleep apnea, depression, and anxiety. Perimenopause symptoms, gone. PMS, gone. Cramps, gone. Gut issues, almost fully healed. SIBO, gone. The only thing I still work on is my gallbladder and some irregular bile dumping, but that’s expected when you have stones and sludge. I’m actively working on it. Now. Something I hear a lot in my comments is “Isn’t that boring? Don’t you get bored eating that? I could never.” No. I really don’t. There are so many combinations of animal products you can eat. The most nutrient dense is red meat, specifically ruminant animals like beef and lamb that ferment their food through rumination. That’s the gold standard. But you can also eat chicken, fish, pork, and plenty of other options. It does not have to be boring. If you tolerate dairy, you can add it in on occasion. I wouldn’t recommend eating a ton of it though, especially hard cheeses or cottage cheese, because they can slow weight loss and stop you up. Yes, I’ve had that experience. It’s not fun. I have to really watch my cheese intake. LMAO. But here’s the real answer to the “boring” question. When you heal your relationship with food and you’re no longer eating to be entertained, no longer eating for comfort, no longer chasing flavor just for the sake of it, and you start eating because your body is genuinely hungry and genuinely needs those nutrients, everything changes. This is something I’ve experienced firsthand. When you sit down and you’re truly hungry, you’re going to eat what’s in front of you. Period. You’re not going to let yourself starve. The truth is, most of the time we eat it’s not even real hunger. It’s “oh it’s been five hours, I should probably eat something.” Or it’s “I had a bad day and I need comfort.” When you stop approaching food that way and your relationship with it shifts to the point where you see it as medicine, as something that heals and nourishes your body in the best way possible, something wild happens. You start to actually crave those foods. I crave steak. I crave cheeseburgers. I crave fat. Never in my life did I think I’d say that. And here I am. Craving fat. So no, to answer your question, I don’t get bored. Because food is not my focus anymore. And honestly, that’s the real problem out there. Food has become everyone’s focus. Not a means for survival but a means for entertainment and pleasure. We’ve got to break that cycle. So eat the meat. Eat the eggs. Eat the kielbasa if that’s what you can afford. Eat the bacon. Eat the ground beef. If you can afford rib eyes every day, go for it. If you can’t, don’t feel bad about it. Not even for a second. I don’t gatekeep information. This is not rocket science, y’all. I don’t even crave those old foods anymore. Not the pasta. Not the garlic bread. Not the ice cream. Not the sandwiches. I do crave soup, but I can kind of have that on carnivore so we’re good. LOL. My point is this. Heal your relationship with food and you won’t be asking that question anymore. Is it boring? No. It was never about the food.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​👑
0:42

I’ve lost 138 pounds. Reversed my insulin resistance, high blood pressure, sleep apnea, depression, and anxiety. Perimenopause symptoms, gone. PMS, gone. Cramps, gone. Gut issues, almost fully healed. SIBO, gone. The only thing I still work on is my gallbladder and some irregular bile dumping, but that’s expected when you have stones and sludge. I’m actively working on it. Now. Something I hear a lot in my comments is “Isn’t that boring? Don’t you get bored eating that? I could never.” No. I really don’t. There are so many combinations of animal products you can eat. The most nutrient dense is red meat, specifically ruminant animals like beef and lamb that ferment their food through rumination. That’s the gold standard. But you can also eat chicken, fish, pork, and plenty of other options. It does not have to be boring. If you tolerate dairy, you can add it in on occasion. I wouldn’t recommend eating a ton of it though, especially hard cheeses or cottage cheese, because they can slow weight loss and stop you up. Yes, I’ve had that experience. It’s not fun. I have to really watch my cheese intake. LMAO. But here’s the real answer to the “boring” question. When you heal your relationship with food and you’re no longer eating to be entertained, no longer eating for comfort, no longer chasing flavor just for the sake of it, and you start eating because your body is genuinely hungry and genuinely needs those nutrients, everything changes. This is something I’ve experienced firsthand. When you sit down and you’re truly hungry, you’re going to eat what’s in front of you. Period. You’re not going to let yourself starve. The truth is, most of the time we eat it’s not even real hunger. It’s “oh it’s been five hours, I should probably eat something.” Or it’s “I had a bad day and I need comfort.” When you stop approaching food that way and your relationship with it shifts to the point where you see it as medicine, as something that heals and nourishes your body in the best way possible, something wild happens. You start to actually crave those foods. I crave steak. I crave cheeseburgers. I crave fat. Never in my life did I think I’d say that. And here I am. Craving fat. So no, to answer your question, I don’t get bored. Because food is not my focus anymore. And honestly, that’s the real problem out there. Food has become everyone’s focus. Not a means for survival but a means for entertainment and pleasure. We’ve got to break that cycle. So eat the meat. Eat the eggs. Eat the kielbasa if that’s what you can afford. Eat the bacon. Eat the ground beef. If you can afford rib eyes every day, go for it. If you can’t, don’t feel bad about it. Not even for a second. I don’t gatekeep information. This is not rocket science, y’all. I don’t even crave those old foods anymore. Not the pasta. Not the garlic bread. Not the ice cream. Not the sandwiches. I do crave soup, but I can kind of have that on carnivore so we’re good. LOL. My point is this. Heal your relationship with food and you won’t be asking that question anymore. Is it boring? No. It was never about the food.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​👑

Queen of Carni

19,369 次观看 • 6 个月前

A foreign government attempted to invest over $100 million into one of David Sinclair's age-reversal companies. The US government BLOCKED it. The reason? They classified the technology as too dangerous to fall into foreign hands. Sinclair sits on the board of the company. He confirmed the investment was killed because the US government believed a foreign power would gain too much access to age-reversal research. When asked if it was China, his response: "I won't say more. It's sensitive." But here's what he DID say: Governments around the world are watching this technology closely. Not just for healthcare. The US government has identified what Sinclair calls "so-called super soldier potential" in age-reversal tech. He also said the winner of this race won't just gain economic advantage. There will be "potential for radical change in the pharmaceutical industry, in healthcare" and dramatic social change. Sinclair believes the technology is very powerful and that society should start preparing now. Because as he put it: "It's not an if. It's a when." David Sinclair is at SynBioBeta this year - discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. Link for tickets below. — David Sinclair
1:45

A foreign government attempted to invest over $100 million into one of David Sinclair's age-reversal companies. The US government BLOCKED it. The reason? They classified the technology as too dangerous to fall into foreign hands. Sinclair sits on the board of the company. He confirmed the investment was killed because the US government believed a foreign power would gain too much access to age-reversal research. When asked if it was China, his response: "I won't say more. It's sensitive." But here's what he DID say: Governments around the world are watching this technology closely. Not just for healthcare. The US government has identified what Sinclair calls "so-called super soldier potential" in age-reversal tech. He also said the winner of this race won't just gain economic advantage. There will be "potential for radical change in the pharmaceutical industry, in healthcare" and dramatic social change. Sinclair believes the technology is very powerful and that society should start preparing now. Because as he put it: "It's not an if. It's a when." David Sinclair is at SynBioBeta this year - discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. Link for tickets below. — David Sinclair

John Cumbers

203,250 次观看 • 5 个月前

How LOVE is MEDICINE 🔈⬆️ Love is so powerful, that it can literally change your gene expression. Science tells us that our social connections, whether with loved ones or through a strong sense of community, can directly influence our gene expression—a field known as sociogenomics. 🧬 When we’re in loving, heart-centered relationships, or part of supportive communities, we activate genes that reduce inflammation, promote repair, and slow aging. On the other hand, conflict and loneliness can switch on genes tied to chronic disease and accelerated aging. One doctor I spoke with told me how love helped him recover from illness—not just emotionally, but physically. It gave him meaning, purpose, and a reason to thrive. The simple act of cuddling, or being surrounded by love and belonging, can literally reprogram your epigenome to heal and repair. Are you spending time with loved ones this week? It will truly benefit your health and longevity. ♥️
1:03

How LOVE is MEDICINE 🔈⬆️ Love is so powerful, that it can literally change your gene expression. Science tells us that our social connections, whether with loved ones or through a strong sense of community, can directly influence our gene expression—a field known as sociogenomics. 🧬 When we’re in loving, heart-centered relationships, or part of supportive communities, we activate genes that reduce inflammation, promote repair, and slow aging. On the other hand, conflict and loneliness can switch on genes tied to chronic disease and accelerated aging. One doctor I spoke with told me how love helped him recover from illness—not just emotionally, but physically. It gave him meaning, purpose, and a reason to thrive. The simple act of cuddling, or being surrounded by love and belonging, can literally reprogram your epigenome to heal and repair. Are you spending time with loved ones this week? It will truly benefit your health and longevity. ♥️

Mark Hyman, M.D.

11,485 次观看 • 4 个月前

Dr. David Sinclair was one of the most well-known advocates for drinking red wine. His reason was because red wine contains resveratrol, a molecule linked in longevity. He drank red wine because of it every day. Then he read data that changed his mind. Studies show that people who drink even one glass of alcohol a day tend to have smaller brain size. And the more you drink, the smaller your brain gets. The trend line was clear. Now he just takes resveratrol as a pure supplement. (about a gram mixed with olive oil or yogurt so his body can absorb it) He says since quitting he has mental clarity he has not felt since his 20s. PS. David Sinclair (David Sinclair) is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. You won't want to miss it. Tickets available now:
1:08

Dr. David Sinclair was one of the most well-known advocates for drinking red wine. His reason was because red wine contains resveratrol, a molecule linked in longevity. He drank red wine because of it every day. Then he read data that changed his mind. Studies show that people who drink even one glass of alcohol a day tend to have smaller brain size. And the more you drink, the smaller your brain gets. The trend line was clear. Now he just takes resveratrol as a pure supplement. (about a gram mixed with olive oil or yogurt so his body can absorb it) He says since quitting he has mental clarity he has not felt since his 20s. PS. David Sinclair (David Sinclair) is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. You won't want to miss it. Tickets available now:

John Cumbers

71,922 次观看 • 4 个月前

Why the 1970s Way of Eating Hit Different – And Why I Can’t Stop Thinking About It I ran across this TikTok video the other day and it genuinely stopped me in my tracks. It was all about how Americans in the 1970s stayed naturally thinner—not because of better genetics or iron willpower, but because the whole food environment was completely different. Meals had real boundaries. You ate breakfast, lunch, and dinner at set times, and that was pretty much it. Snacking wasn’t the constant background noise it is today. As someone who actually grew up in that era, it rang so true. We didn’t have endless cabinets full of brightly packaged snacks calling our names. You ate when it was mealtime, portions were reasonable (a hamburger was hamburger-sized, fries came in actual small bags), and the kitchen pretty much closed after dinner cleanup. No grazing all day long, no supersized everything, no ultra-processed options lurking everywhere. Meals were smaller, more proportionate, and made from basic ingredients—fresh or simply prepared. It made me reflect: maybe we really do need to borrow a page from the 70s playbook. Go back to eating at specific times instead of all-day snacking. Choose normal, human-sized portions instead of the inflated ones we’ve gotten used to. Cut way back on the junk and focus on real food again. It felt healthier, more balanced, and honestly more sustainable than the constant diet culture we live in now. That video stuck with me because it wasn’t about shaming anyone—it was about remembering a simpler, more natural way of relating to food. I’m inspired to try bringing more of that 70s rhythm into my own life. Clear meal times, smaller plates, fewer processed snacks. It might just be the reset a lot of us need. Who else remembers eating this way and feels like it’s time to bring it back?
3:14

Why the 1970s Way of Eating Hit Different – And Why I Can’t Stop Thinking About It I ran across this TikTok video the other day and it genuinely stopped me in my tracks. It was all about how Americans in the 1970s stayed naturally thinner—not because of better genetics or iron willpower, but because the whole food environment was completely different. Meals had real boundaries. You ate breakfast, lunch, and dinner at set times, and that was pretty much it. Snacking wasn’t the constant background noise it is today. As someone who actually grew up in that era, it rang so true. We didn’t have endless cabinets full of brightly packaged snacks calling our names. You ate when it was mealtime, portions were reasonable (a hamburger was hamburger-sized, fries came in actual small bags), and the kitchen pretty much closed after dinner cleanup. No grazing all day long, no supersized everything, no ultra-processed options lurking everywhere. Meals were smaller, more proportionate, and made from basic ingredients—fresh or simply prepared. It made me reflect: maybe we really do need to borrow a page from the 70s playbook. Go back to eating at specific times instead of all-day snacking. Choose normal, human-sized portions instead of the inflated ones we’ve gotten used to. Cut way back on the junk and focus on real food again. It felt healthier, more balanced, and honestly more sustainable than the constant diet culture we live in now. That video stuck with me because it wasn’t about shaming anyone—it was about remembering a simpler, more natural way of relating to food. I’m inspired to try bringing more of that 70s rhythm into my own life. Clear meal times, smaller plates, fewer processed snacks. It might just be the reset a lot of us need. Who else remembers eating this way and feels like it’s time to bring it back?

NancyH

113,568 次观看 • 3 个月前

"What I was not told and what my parents were not told is that these [psychiatric] drugs are approved by the FDA on the basis of very short term trials - six to eight weeks on average. There is zero evidence base for polypharmacy. So, these drugs…their safety and efficacy has never been studied in combination with each other. And every single psychiatric drug across all the different drug classes is dependence-forming, meaning, as I said earlier, if you take this drug for any length of time, your body may well completely alter itself to accommodate the presence of the drug, so that if you want to come off of it one day, you might have a really hard time doing that. And you might need years of tapering. And I think, especially for girls and women who are teenagers or entering into their young adult childbearing years, it should be a legal requirement that doctors tell us before we start these drugs that if you want to have a child one day, you need to build in a long-term exit strategy here so that you don't find yourself in a situation where you need to stop this drug abruptly and potentially cause significant harm to yourself." - Laura Delano
9:43

"What I was not told and what my parents were not told is that these [psychiatric] drugs are approved by the FDA on the basis of very short term trials - six to eight weeks on average. There is zero evidence base for polypharmacy. So, these drugs…their safety and efficacy has never been studied in combination with each other. And every single psychiatric drug across all the different drug classes is dependence-forming, meaning, as I said earlier, if you take this drug for any length of time, your body may well completely alter itself to accommodate the presence of the drug, so that if you want to come off of it one day, you might have a really hard time doing that. And you might need years of tapering. And I think, especially for girls and women who are teenagers or entering into their young adult childbearing years, it should be a legal requirement that doctors tell us before we start these drugs that if you want to have a child one day, you need to build in a long-term exit strategy here so that you don't find yourself in a situation where you need to stop this drug abruptly and potentially cause significant harm to yourself." - Laura Delano

Jan Jekielek

20,592 次观看 • 1 年前

"Every team wants to win a championship, but not every team wants to do the things required for a championship. And here's the thing: it's easy to be an average team. It doesn't require a lot. It's less adversity to be average in the world. The consequences of being average aren't easy. We end up wearing them. There's strain and struggle that comes with that too. The standard is just lower to be an average team. To be a championship team, to be champion, to be a championship team member here . . . I'm not gonna lie to you . . . I'm going to tell you the truth. It is harder. It is. The question is: Is it worth it? Some people say, "Oh it's not harder work." Yes it is. It's harder work. You can pursue comfort or you can pursue excellence. If we pursue comfort, we gotta give up some excellence. But if we pursue excellence, then we're just going to face more adversity. Everyone who's ever accomplished something excellence has had to overcome it. We are here today for a reason. Two reasons actually. Reason #1 is let's make sure that we identify and realize the opportunities that are in front of us. Reason #2 is let's make sure that we are preparing for the adversity that those opportunities require. And just understand: every single time you lever up your opportunities and you identify, "Oh there's something more I can do, more I can achieve. I can get better. I can earn more. I can do this." It's going to be matched with the adversity that comes with it. I want to make sure we are prepared for both of those, so that we're not chasing big opportunities and then getting mad when things start getting harder along the way. Is that fair? Does that make sense?"
1:44

"Every team wants to win a championship, but not every team wants to do the things required for a championship. And here's the thing: it's easy to be an average team. It doesn't require a lot. It's less adversity to be average in the world. The consequences of being average aren't easy. We end up wearing them. There's strain and struggle that comes with that too. The standard is just lower to be an average team. To be a championship team, to be champion, to be a championship team member here . . . I'm not gonna lie to you . . . I'm going to tell you the truth. It is harder. It is. The question is: Is it worth it? Some people say, "Oh it's not harder work." Yes it is. It's harder work. You can pursue comfort or you can pursue excellence. If we pursue comfort, we gotta give up some excellence. But if we pursue excellence, then we're just going to face more adversity. Everyone who's ever accomplished something excellence has had to overcome it. We are here today for a reason. Two reasons actually. Reason #1 is let's make sure that we identify and realize the opportunities that are in front of us. Reason #2 is let's make sure that we are preparing for the adversity that those opportunities require. And just understand: every single time you lever up your opportunities and you identify, "Oh there's something more I can do, more I can achieve. I can get better. I can earn more. I can do this." It's going to be matched with the adversity that comes with it. I want to make sure we are prepared for both of those, so that we're not chasing big opportunities and then getting mad when things start getting harder along the way. Is that fair? Does that make sense?"

Brian Kight

125,742 次观看 • 2 年前

50% of people are walking around with dangerously low vitamin K — even if they supplement. Rhonda Patrick dropped this on Mayim Bialik’s podcast and it genuinely unsettled me. Vitamin K isn’t just “nice to have.” It’s the nutrient that keeps calcium out of your arteries and puts it where it belongs — in your bones. When you’re chronically low, calcium starts building up in your blood vessels instead, silently accelerating atherosclerosis year after year. You won’t feel it. No bleeding gums, no obvious warning signs. Just quiet, insidious damage that the standard RDAs were never designed to prevent. Dr. Bruce Ames called these “longevity vitamins” because they protect against the hidden damage that shows up decades later as heart disease and weakened bones. The craziest part? Most of this comes down to simply not eating enough greens. Have you ever realized a nutrient you thought was “fine” was actually quietly harming you over the long term — and did it change how seriously you take your diet?
3:15

50% of people are walking around with dangerously low vitamin K — even if they supplement. Rhonda Patrick dropped this on Mayim Bialik’s podcast and it genuinely unsettled me. Vitamin K isn’t just “nice to have.” It’s the nutrient that keeps calcium out of your arteries and puts it where it belongs — in your bones. When you’re chronically low, calcium starts building up in your blood vessels instead, silently accelerating atherosclerosis year after year. You won’t feel it. No bleeding gums, no obvious warning signs. Just quiet, insidious damage that the standard RDAs were never designed to prevent. Dr. Bruce Ames called these “longevity vitamins” because they protect against the hidden damage that shows up decades later as heart disease and weakened bones. The craziest part? Most of this comes down to simply not eating enough greens. Have you ever realized a nutrient you thought was “fine” was actually quietly harming you over the long term — and did it change how seriously you take your diet?

Camus

37,783 次观看 • 4 个月前