正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Why is Brad Gerstner calling Cursor the thing getting the least attention as SpaceX goes public? Because if Grok 4.3 reaches the coding frontier, SpaceX will combine: - The largest proprietary coding dataset (more than the public internet) - The largest available compute cluster - The fastest-growing agentic coding... show more

Podcast Alpha

15,233 subscribers

37,478 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The most overlooked part of the SpaceX IPO thesis is the model and most people are completely missing it (Save this) Everyone has been focused on the Anthropic compute deal and the Colossus revenue because those are numbers you can put in a spreadsheet. Six months ago, xAI was competing reasonably well on model performance but was not clearly on the frontier. Then SpaceX exercised its option to acquire Cursor for $60 billion, the largest startup acquisition in history just days after completing the largest IPO in history at $75 billion. Cursor is a team of 700 to 800 people, was on track to exit 2026 at up to $10 billion in revenue, had millions of professional developers using it daily, and had already built a team with the genuine potential to compete at the frontier, the one thing holding them back was compute. SpaceX just gave them the largest GPU cluster in the world to work with. Grok 4.3, a 1.5 trillion parameter model, is currently training with Cursor's proprietary coding data being injected directly into pre-training, not just fine tuning which is a fundamentally more powerful integration than anything the market is currently modeling. The prior version, Grok 4, was already on the Pareto frontier as of 10 to 12 days ago, the most intelligent 500 billion parameter model in the world, sitting alongside Google Gemini, Anthropic, and OpenAI as one of only four systems at the true frontier. Composer 2.5, the previous Cursor model was Pareto dominant in coding tasks just before the acquisition closed, meaning SpaceX inherited a model that was already best-in-class in the highest-value AI use case in the market. The AWS parallel is the one everyone keeps missing. Bezos built data center capacity for Black Friday, sat on idle infrastructure the rest of the year, and monetized it into what was at the time the most profitable technology business in history and investors hated it in 2009 and 2010 because he was burning free cash flow on capacity that had no obvious revenue yet. SpaceX is in exactly that position, it built Colossus for xAI's own training needs, is monetizing excess capacity to Anthropic at $1.25 billion per month across 220,000 Nvidia GPUs, and has reportedly secured up to 20% of Nvidia's early Vera Rubin allocation, giving it the most powerful and scarcest GPU infrastructure in the world during the critical window when those chips are hardest to get. The $60 billion Cursor acquisition closed at a moment when SpaceX had essentially unlimited compute, a team already at the frontier, and a product with deep enterprise distribution, three things no other model lab had simultaneously when it was at this stage. The market is pricing the compute business conservatively and ignoring the model call option entirely, and coding is the fastest path to AGI, once you are on the Pareto frontier with that compute, revenue scales fast. Anthropic went from negligible revenue to $30 billion annualized in under 18 months and that is the existence proof. Bullish on SpaceXAI and Elon Musk

The most overlooked part of the SpaceX IPO thesis is the model and most people are completely missing it (Save this) Everyone has been focused on the Anthropic compute deal and the Colossus revenue because those are numbers you can put in a spreadsheet. Six months ago, xAI was competing reasonably well on model performance but was not clearly on the frontier. Then SpaceX exercised its option to acquire Cursor for $60 billion, the largest startup acquisition in history just days after completing the largest IPO in history at $75 billion. Cursor is a team of 700 to 800 people, was on track to exit 2026 at up to $10 billion in revenue, had millions of professional developers using it daily, and had already built a team with the genuine potential to compete at the frontier, the one thing holding them back was compute. SpaceX just gave them the largest GPU cluster in the world to work with. Grok 4.3, a 1.5 trillion parameter model, is currently training with Cursor's proprietary coding data being injected directly into pre-training, not just fine tuning which is a fundamentally more powerful integration than anything the market is currently modeling. The prior version, Grok 4, was already on the Pareto frontier as of 10 to 12 days ago, the most intelligent 500 billion parameter model in the world, sitting alongside Google Gemini, Anthropic, and OpenAI as one of only four systems at the true frontier. Composer 2.5, the previous Cursor model was Pareto dominant in coding tasks just before the acquisition closed, meaning SpaceX inherited a model that was already best-in-class in the highest-value AI use case in the market. The AWS parallel is the one everyone keeps missing. Bezos built data center capacity for Black Friday, sat on idle infrastructure the rest of the year, and monetized it into what was at the time the most profitable technology business in history and investors hated it in 2009 and 2010 because he was burning free cash flow on capacity that had no obvious revenue yet. SpaceX is in exactly that position, it built Colossus for xAI's own training needs, is monetizing excess capacity to Anthropic at $1.25 billion per month across 220,000 Nvidia GPUs, and has reportedly secured up to 20% of Nvidia's early Vera Rubin allocation, giving it the most powerful and scarcest GPU infrastructure in the world during the critical window when those chips are hardest to get. The $60 billion Cursor acquisition closed at a moment when SpaceX had essentially unlimited compute, a team already at the frontier, and a product with deep enterprise distribution, three things no other model lab had simultaneously when it was at this stage. The market is pricing the compute business conservatively and ignoring the model call option entirely, and coding is the fastest path to AGI, once you are on the Pareto frontier with that compute, revenue scales fast. Anthropic went from negligible revenue to $30 billion annualized in under 18 months and that is the existence proof. Bullish on SpaceXAI and Elon Musk

Milk Road AI

69,620 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 POD UP! Fifth Bestie Brad Gerstner is BACK! Brad Gerstner fills in for david friedberg: -- OpenAI vs Anthropic IPOs -- The Open Source Decision in July 2026 -- Meta's New Model, Zuck's Price War -- China to Crack Down on Open Source? -- Trump Accounts Launch (0:00) Bestie intros: Brad Gerstner fills in for Friedberg! (2:58) OpenAI vs Anthropic IPOs: Why it matters who goes first, what they learned from SpaceX, unlimited TAM of intelligence (27:39) The open source decision, Meta's new model, Zuck's price war, AI duopoly (54:29) CCP considering putting export controls on Chinese models, is open source ending in China? (1:03:09) Trump Accounts launch, getting young Americans bought back into capitalism

🚨 POD UP! Fifth Bestie Brad Gerstner is BACK! Brad Gerstner fills in for david friedberg: -- OpenAI vs Anthropic IPOs -- The Open Source Decision in July 2026 -- Meta's New Model, Zuck's Price War -- China to Crack Down on Open Source? -- Trump Accounts Launch (0:00) Bestie intros: Brad Gerstner fills in for Friedberg! (2:58) OpenAI vs Anthropic IPOs: Why it matters who goes first, what they learned from SpaceX, unlimited TAM of intelligence (27:39) The open source decision, Meta's new model, Zuck's price war, AI duopoly (54:29) CCP considering putting export controls on Chinese models, is open source ending in China? (1:03:09) Trump Accounts launch, getting young Americans bought back into capitalism

The All-In Podcast

255,309 次观看 • 24 天前

🤖 Microsoft’s approach to headcount in the AI era: "I will say we will grow a headcount, but the way I look at it is that headcount we grow will grow with a lot more leverage than the headcount we had pre ai. And that's the adjustment. I think structurally you are seeing first, right? Which is one you called it 'getting fit.' — Satya Nadella on Bg2 Pod with Brad Gerstner and Sam Altman w/ Brad Gerstner adding: "I think we're on the verge of incredible economic productivity growth."

🤖 Microsoft’s approach to headcount in the AI era: "I will say we will grow a headcount, but the way I look at it is that headcount we grow will grow with a lot more leverage than the headcount we had pre ai. And that's the adjustment. I think structurally you are seeing first, right? Which is one you called it 'getting fit.' — Satya Nadella on Bg2 Pod with Brad Gerstner and Sam Altman w/ Brad Gerstner adding: "I think we're on the verge of incredible economic productivity growth."

bg2clips

18,368 次观看 • 8 个月前

If you're thinking about buying SpaceX at IPO, Brad Gerstner's answer to that exact question: 30%. Brad Gerstner on The All-In Podcast: not 100%, not 50%. Deploy 30% of fresh capital at these levels. The reasoning: 14 levered ETFs are queued for SpaceX IPO day at a $1.75 trillion implied valuation. That's the kind of product launch that only happens when retail enthusiasm peaks. Gavin Baker's framing: current conditions are 2021, not 1999. The froth is real but not extreme. A 10-20% correction in public semis would still mean 30-40% drawdowns in high-beta SpaceX-adjacent names. If you're new to the position, that's a real duration test. The structural bull case - Gavin's mutual fund demand wall - is real. But it materializes at IPO, not in secondaries today. The 6% premium you pay now is not the same as the institutional bid that comes later. Full position-sizing framework from the panel: Source: All-In Podcast -

If you're thinking about buying SpaceX at IPO, Brad Gerstner's answer to that exact question: 30%. Brad Gerstner on The All-In Podcast: not 100%, not 50%. Deploy 30% of fresh capital at these levels. The reasoning: 14 levered ETFs are queued for SpaceX IPO day at a $1.75 trillion implied valuation. That's the kind of product launch that only happens when retail enthusiasm peaks. Gavin Baker's framing: current conditions are 2021, not 1999. The froth is real but not extreme. A 10-20% correction in public semis would still mean 30-40% drawdowns in high-beta SpaceX-adjacent names. If you're new to the position, that's a real duration test. The structural bull case - Gavin's mutual fund demand wall - is real. But it materializes at IPO, not in secondaries today. The 6% premium you pay now is not the same as the institutional bid that comes later. Full position-sizing framework from the panel: Source: All-In Podcast -

Podcast Alpha

52,743 次观看 • 1 个月前

Elon Musk just made one if the biggest moves in taking over the programming industry “SpaceX just bought Cursor for $60 billion. Do you realize how big this is? SpaceX went public — the biggest IPO in history. $75 billion raised, almost a $2 trillion valuation and the first thing to do with that money? Buy the most popular AI coding tool on the planet. Here's why that changes everything. Elon now owns 3 layers: the compute, Colossus data centers, the models, Grok through xAI, and now the tool that developers actually use every day. It's the full stack. And here's what makes Cursor different from Claude Code or Codex. Cursor is model agnostic. You can run Claude in it, GPT, Gemini, whatever model you want. It's not locked to any one company, and now it has SpaceX's resources behind it. Cursor said they were bottlenecked by compute. Well, that bottleneck has just been removed. $4 billion in annual revenue, over half the Fortune 500 already uses it, and now it's backed by a $2 trillion company. OpenAI has Codex, Anthropic has Claude Code, and now Elon has Cursor.” Let me break this down in simple terms Elon Musk now controls more of the full AI picture: - Massive computers, power (data centers like Colossus) - Smart AI models (Grok from xAI) - The actual tool millions of developers use every day (Cursor) For every day users this means Faster and smarter apps and websites in the future. More developers using powerful AI tools means new apps, games, websites, and features get built quicker and cheaper. This means better video games, smoother streaming, smarter phone apps and better programs For Developers they can describe what they want in plain English (“make a feature that does X”) and the AI handles more of the heavy lifting

Elon Musk just made one if the biggest moves in taking over the programming industry “SpaceX just bought Cursor for $60 billion. Do you realize how big this is? SpaceX went public — the biggest IPO in history. $75 billion raised, almost a $2 trillion valuation and the first thing to do with that money? Buy the most popular AI coding tool on the planet. Here's why that changes everything. Elon now owns 3 layers: the compute, Colossus data centers, the models, Grok through xAI, and now the tool that developers actually use every day. It's the full stack. And here's what makes Cursor different from Claude Code or Codex. Cursor is model agnostic. You can run Claude in it, GPT, Gemini, whatever model you want. It's not locked to any one company, and now it has SpaceX's resources behind it. Cursor said they were bottlenecked by compute. Well, that bottleneck has just been removed. $4 billion in annual revenue, over half the Fortune 500 already uses it, and now it's backed by a $2 trillion company. OpenAI has Codex, Anthropic has Claude Code, and now Elon has Cursor.” Let me break this down in simple terms Elon Musk now controls more of the full AI picture: - Massive computers, power (data centers like Colossus) - Smart AI models (Grok from xAI) - The actual tool millions of developers use every day (Cursor) For every day users this means Faster and smarter apps and websites in the future. More developers using powerful AI tools means new apps, games, websites, and features get built quicker and cheaper. This means better video games, smoother streaming, smarter phone apps and better programs For Developers they can describe what they want in plain English (“make a feature that does X”) and the AI handles more of the heavy lifting

Wall Street Apes

213,426 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸 DAVID SACKS: ELON IS SCALING AI TRAINING CLUSTERS FASTER THAN ANYONE, GROK 5 GETTING "LARGEST CLUSTER OF BLACKWELLS" All In podcast co-host David Sacks assessed the AI competitive landscape, declaring that xAI's Grok has carved out dominance in current events while Elon is outpacing rivals in data center scaling for the next generation model: "xAI is the best at current events because of the integration with X. Elon seems to be able to scale his data center, his training cluster the fastest. He had Clusters One, now he's got Clusters Two, and that portends good things for Grok 5. He's gonna be trained on the largest cluster of Blackwells." While OpenAI and Google fight over consumer chatbots, Elon's quietly building the biggest training infrastructure in the industry. Real-time X integration plus the largest Blackwell GPU cluster will make Grok 5 a serious game changer. Source: David Sacks

🇺🇸 DAVID SACKS: ELON IS SCALING AI TRAINING CLUSTERS FASTER THAN ANYONE, GROK 5 GETTING "LARGEST CLUSTER OF BLACKWELLS" All In podcast co-host David Sacks assessed the AI competitive landscape, declaring that xAI's Grok has carved out dominance in current events while Elon is outpacing rivals in data center scaling for the next generation model: "xAI is the best at current events because of the integration with X. Elon seems to be able to scale his data center, his training cluster the fastest. He had Clusters One, now he's got Clusters Two, and that portends good things for Grok 5. He's gonna be trained on the largest cluster of Blackwells." While OpenAI and Google fight over consumer chatbots, Elon's quietly building the biggest training infrastructure in the industry. Real-time X integration plus the largest Blackwell GPU cluster will make Grok 5 a serious game changer. Source: David Sacks

Mario Nawfal

147,565 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 SPACEX IS ABOUT TO REPEAT TESLA 2010 And nobody is ready for what will happen 2010: Tesla goes public $1.13 → $2.03 Everyone said the same thing: “This is the future” “Elon is changing the world” Then came the part nobody talks about: Tesla collapsed 60% $2.03 → $0.9 In days Now look at today: 2026: – SpaceX just went public – +30% from the IPO price at launch – Biggest IPO in market history – Everyone is calling it “the next Tesla” But there’s one thing… Tesla 2010: - Small valuation - Post-crash market - Low expectations - No trillion-dollar exit SpaceX 2026: - $1.75T IPO - Retail access opened at the last second - The stock market is at the most overvalued level in history That is not the same opportunity Most people think Tesla 2010 means straight up forever: Yes, Tesla pumped first Then it destroyed everyone who chased it That is the part they leave out Now SpaceX has the same Elon premium The same future narrative. But much worse timing So now you have two choices: Chase the most expensive IPO in history after a +30% launch pump Or understand what Tesla 2010 already showed you Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000 The next call will be even more important When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later

🚨 SPACEX IS ABOUT TO REPEAT TESLA 2010 And nobody is ready for what will happen 2010: Tesla goes public $1.13 → $2.03 Everyone said the same thing: “This is the future” “Elon is changing the world” Then came the part nobody talks about: Tesla collapsed 60% $2.03 → $0.9 In days Now look at today: 2026: – SpaceX just went public – +30% from the IPO price at launch – Biggest IPO in market history – Everyone is calling it “the next Tesla” But there’s one thing… Tesla 2010: - Small valuation - Post-crash market - Low expectations - No trillion-dollar exit SpaceX 2026: - $1.75T IPO - Retail access opened at the last second - The stock market is at the most overvalued level in history That is not the same opportunity Most people think Tesla 2010 means straight up forever: Yes, Tesla pumped first Then it destroyed everyone who chased it That is the part they leave out Now SpaceX has the same Elon premium The same future narrative. But much worse timing So now you have two choices: Chase the most expensive IPO in history after a +30% launch pump Or understand what Tesla 2010 already showed you Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000 The next call will be even more important When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later

Hopper

35,138 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 SPACEX IS ABOUT TO REPEAT TESLA 2010 And nobody is ready for what will happen. 2010: Tesla goes public. $1.13 → $2.03 Everyone said the same thing: “This is the future.” “Elon is changing the world.” Then came the part nobody talks about: Tesla collapsed 50%. $2.03 → $1.00 In days. Now look at today: 2026: – SpaceX just went public – +30% from the IPO price at launch – Biggest IPO in market history – Everyone is calling it “the next Tesla” But there’s one thing… Tesla 2010: - Small valuation - Post-crash market - Low expectations - No trillion-dollar exit SpaceX 2026: - $1.75T IPO - Retail access opened at the last second - The stock market is at the most overvalued level in history That is not the same opportunity. Most people think Tesla 2010 means straight up forever: Yes, Tesla pumped first. Then it destroyed everyone who chased it. That is the part they leave out. Now SpaceX has the same Elon premium. The same future narrative. But much worse timing. So now you have two choices: Chase the most expensive IPO in history after a +30% launch pump… Or understand what Tesla 2010 already showed you. Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. The next call will be even more important. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

🚨 SPACEX IS ABOUT TO REPEAT TESLA 2010 And nobody is ready for what will happen. 2010: Tesla goes public. $1.13 → $2.03 Everyone said the same thing: “This is the future.” “Elon is changing the world.” Then came the part nobody talks about: Tesla collapsed 50%. $2.03 → $1.00 In days. Now look at today: 2026: – SpaceX just went public – +30% from the IPO price at launch – Biggest IPO in market history – Everyone is calling it “the next Tesla” But there’s one thing… Tesla 2010: - Small valuation - Post-crash market - Low expectations - No trillion-dollar exit SpaceX 2026: - $1.75T IPO - Retail access opened at the last second - The stock market is at the most overvalued level in history That is not the same opportunity. Most people think Tesla 2010 means straight up forever: Yes, Tesla pumped first. Then it destroyed everyone who chased it. That is the part they leave out. Now SpaceX has the same Elon premium. The same future narrative. But much worse timing. So now you have two choices: Chase the most expensive IPO in history after a +30% launch pump… Or understand what Tesla 2010 already showed you. Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. The next call will be even more important. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

Alex Mason 👁△

2,422,847 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 $SPCX IPO IS THE BIGGEST LIQUIDITY TRAP IN MODERN HISTORY Everyone thinks SpaceX IPO is free money People said the exact same thing about Meta in 2012 However, after Meta went public, the stock dumped over 50% in the first 100 days Retail bought the hype, insiders got their exit Now the same scenario is repeating again SpaceX goes public June 12 at $135/share - $1.75 to $2 TRILLION valuation That would make it one of the 7 largest companies in the entire US market overnight But here's the problem: This is not an IPO but a $75 BILLION liquidity event 555 million shares × $135 = $75B that needs to be absorbed by someone Insiders own 95% of SpaceX right now, public float is 5% That means insiders are sitting on over $1.6 TRILLION in paper wealth After June 12, they will start converting it into real cash Lockup expires September–December 2026 That's when the real dumping begins Michael Burry already warned about this He said SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic could raise more capital than 300 dot-com IPOs in 2000 - COMBINED And this isn't just words: $912M in $PLTR puts + $186M in $NVDA puts extended into 2027 Connect the dots This could be the largest coordinated insider cashout in market history I've studied macro for 10 years and nailed the October BTC $126k ATH while everyone were screaming about supercycle Follow + notifs on, I will keep you updated

🚨 $SPCX IPO IS THE BIGGEST LIQUIDITY TRAP IN MODERN HISTORY Everyone thinks SpaceX IPO is free money People said the exact same thing about Meta in 2012 However, after Meta went public, the stock dumped over 50% in the first 100 days Retail bought the hype, insiders got their exit Now the same scenario is repeating again SpaceX goes public June 12 at $135/share - $1.75 to $2 TRILLION valuation That would make it one of the 7 largest companies in the entire US market overnight But here's the problem: This is not an IPO but a $75 BILLION liquidity event 555 million shares × $135 = $75B that needs to be absorbed by someone Insiders own 95% of SpaceX right now, public float is 5% That means insiders are sitting on over $1.6 TRILLION in paper wealth After June 12, they will start converting it into real cash Lockup expires September–December 2026 That's when the real dumping begins Michael Burry already warned about this He said SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic could raise more capital than 300 dot-com IPOs in 2000 - COMBINED And this isn't just words: $912M in $PLTR puts + $186M in $NVDA puts extended into 2027 Connect the dots This could be the largest coordinated insider cashout in market history I've studied macro for 10 years and nailed the October BTC $126k ATH while everyone were screaming about supercycle Follow + notifs on, I will keep you updated

Pepesso

1,045,684 次观看 • 2 个月前

TOM LEE: THIS IS CASH RAISING, NOT THE TOP Tom Lee Thomas (Tom) Lee (not drummer) FundstratDirect.com says the market is getting hit because institutions are raising cash ahead of the $75B SpaceX IPO. They may need cash for the IPO, then more cash to build a full market weight position in the aftermarket. That means selling recent winners. But Tom says the charts are not broken, this dip gets bought, and because so many people think SpaceX marks the top, it probably is not the top.

TOM LEE: THIS IS CASH RAISING, NOT THE TOP Tom Lee Thomas (Tom) Lee (not drummer) FundstratDirect.com says the market is getting hit because institutions are raising cash ahead of the $75B SpaceX IPO. They may need cash for the IPO, then more cash to build a full market weight position in the aftermarket. That means selling recent winners. But Tom says the charts are not broken, this dip gets bought, and because so many people think SpaceX marks the top, it probably is not the top.

BMNR Bullz

436,008 次观看 • 1 个月前

i got a better breakdown of the SpaceX/Cursor deal than any single article i've read. cost me $0.01 and 90 seconds. the web was built to keep bots out. paywalls, CAPTCHAs, OAuth. so when your agent tries to research something, it hits walls everywhere. browsed agentic(.)market this morning, found Exa on the services leaderboard. neural web search, pay per query, no account needed. pointed my agent at it in Claude Code. one query. $0.01. 10 full articles from Reuters, CNBC, Bloomberg, TechCrunch, NYT. what it found: SpaceX didn't acquire Cursor. they secured a $60B call option, exercisable by year-end, with a $10B breakup fee. the real motivation per Bloomberg: xAI lags in coding and Musk wants to catch up to Claude Code and Codex. this is an xAI play wearing SpaceX's jersey for the IPO. full walkthrough in the video (which is longer than the e2e research exercise!)

i got a better breakdown of the SpaceX/Cursor deal than any single article i've read. cost me $0.01 and 90 seconds. the web was built to keep bots out. paywalls, CAPTCHAs, OAuth. so when your agent tries to research something, it hits walls everywhere. browsed agentic(.)market this morning, found Exa on the services leaderboard. neural web search, pay per query, no account needed. pointed my agent at it in Claude Code. one query. $0.01. 10 full articles from Reuters, CNBC, Bloomberg, TechCrunch, NYT. what it found: SpaceX didn't acquire Cursor. they secured a $60B call option, exercisable by year-end, with a $10B breakup fee. the real motivation per Bloomberg: xAI lags in coding and Musk wants to catch up to Claude Code and Codex. this is an xAI play wearing SpaceX's jersey for the IPO. full walkthrough in the video (which is longer than the e2e research exercise!)

Nick Prince🛡

81,298 次观看 • 3 个月前

⚡ Gavin Baker on why Elon's data center strategy is printing money — and Brad Gerstner on why nobody saw it coming: "If you can borrow money at 6, 7, 8% and invest in something with a 55% ARR, I'm not the most sophisticated thinker, but that math maths... We do know from Jensen that Elon Musk brings data centers up faster than anyone, 122 days. Speed is literally cost." "This whole category of taking all of this compute, which he's uniquely good at standing up, and then reselling it in a way that's highly profitable was not in a lot of people's forecasts — now it's a major component of the forecast." — Gavin Baker & Brad Gerstner on Bg2 Pod / BGGB Pod As Jensen Huang said, “Elon is an N of 1.”

⚡ Gavin Baker on why Elon's data center strategy is printing money — and Brad Gerstner on why nobody saw it coming: "If you can borrow money at 6, 7, 8% and invest in something with a 55% ARR, I'm not the most sophisticated thinker, but that math maths... We do know from Jensen that Elon Musk brings data centers up faster than anyone, 122 days. Speed is literally cost." "This whole category of taking all of this compute, which he's uniquely good at standing up, and then reselling it in a way that's highly profitable was not in a lot of people's forecasts — now it's a major component of the forecast." — Gavin Baker & Brad Gerstner on Bg2 Pod / BGGB Pod As Jensen Huang said, “Elon is an N of 1.”

bg2clips

15,672 次观看 • 1 个月前

Not NVIDIA. Not OpenAI. Eli Lilly. Jordi Visser (Jordi Visser) says a 150-year-old pharma company in Indianapolis has the best shot at becoming the world's largest company within five years. The case: ~1,000 NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs in a private data center, a co-innovation lab with Jensen Huang, an AlphaFold partnership via Isomorphic Labs, Toon Lab in Silicon Valley, and 150 years of proprietary metabolic disease data no general model can replicate. That last moat is the one that matters. You cannot train your way to that dataset. Eli Lilly has it. The investor gap: the stock is filed under healthcare. The thesis is AI application. That category mismatch is where the repricing happens. The full breakdown on why $LLY is the AI trade the market hasn't priced: Source: Anthony Pompliano Podcast -

Not NVIDIA. Not OpenAI. Eli Lilly. Jordi Visser (Jordi Visser) says a 150-year-old pharma company in Indianapolis has the best shot at becoming the world's largest company within five years. The case: ~1,000 NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs in a private data center, a co-innovation lab with Jensen Huang, an AlphaFold partnership via Isomorphic Labs, Toon Lab in Silicon Valley, and 150 years of proprietary metabolic disease data no general model can replicate. That last moat is the one that matters. You cannot train your way to that dataset. Eli Lilly has it. The investor gap: the stock is filed under healthcare. The thesis is AI application. That category mismatch is where the repricing happens. The full breakdown on why $LLY is the AI trade the market hasn't priced: Source: Anthony Pompliano Podcast -

Podcast Alpha

63,599 次观看 • 1 个月前

AI Mega-Rounds Offer Better Value Than Series A "If ARR multiples are the metric, the best value is buying companies at 18x ARR growing 10x year on year. You can invest in something already massive that will clearly go public at a better multiple. That’s why smart capital allocators are moving into these mega-rounds." Rory O'Driscoll Love to hear your thoughts on this Shaun Maguire Brad Gerstner mmurph Byron Deeter Yasmin Razavi

AI Mega-Rounds Offer Better Value Than Series A "If ARR multiples are the metric, the best value is buying companies at 18x ARR growing 10x year on year. You can invest in something already massive that will clearly go public at a better multiple. That’s why smart capital allocators are moving into these mega-rounds." Rory O'Driscoll Love to hear your thoughts on this Shaun Maguire Brad Gerstner mmurph Byron Deeter Yasmin Razavi

Harry Stebbings

21,530 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨BIG EPISODE BESTIES! Sacks is back, Fifth Bestie Brad Gerstner fills in for david friedberg -- Anthropic withholds Mythos: serious concern or another marketing stunt? -- OpenClaw vs everybody: Are frontier model makers trying to kill the open source agent platform? -- Anthropic's $30B run rate: fastest ever, do they already have market dominance in AI code? -- The AI vibe shift: OpenAI reels as Anthropic rips -- Iran War: ceasefire and Israel's influence on US foreign policy (0:00) Bestie intros: Brad Gerstner joins the show! (4:22) Anthropic blocks Mythos release for security concerns: serious or marketing stunt? (24:07) Are OpenAI and Anthropic trying to kill OpenClaw? Does Anthropic already have market dominance in AI coding? (42:20) Anthropic $30B run rate, fastest revenue ramp ever, the TAM for intelligence (58:01) Major vibe shift: Anthropic ripping, OpenAI reeling (1:10:12) Iran War: Ceasefire, Israel's influence, market impact

🚨BIG EPISODE BESTIES! Sacks is back, Fifth Bestie Brad Gerstner fills in for david friedberg -- Anthropic withholds Mythos: serious concern or another marketing stunt? -- OpenClaw vs everybody: Are frontier model makers trying to kill the open source agent platform? -- Anthropic's $30B run rate: fastest ever, do they already have market dominance in AI code? -- The AI vibe shift: OpenAI reels as Anthropic rips -- Iran War: ceasefire and Israel's influence on US foreign policy (0:00) Bestie intros: Brad Gerstner joins the show! (4:22) Anthropic blocks Mythos release for security concerns: serious or marketing stunt? (24:07) Are OpenAI and Anthropic trying to kill OpenClaw? Does Anthropic already have market dominance in AI coding? (42:20) Anthropic $30B run rate, fastest revenue ramp ever, the TAM for intelligence (58:01) Major vibe shift: Anthropic ripping, OpenAI reeling (1:10:12) Iran War: Ceasefire, Israel's influence, market impact

The All-In Podcast

338,810 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 WARNING: SPACEX IPO IS A REAL BIG STORM FOR MARKETS!! Everyone thinks $SPCX IPO will be free money. But people thought the same about Meta in 2012. After Meta went public, the stock dumped more than 70% in the first 100 days. Retail bought the hype. Then insiders and early investors got liquidity. Now the same setup is coming again. SpaceX is expected to go public on June 12 at a $1.75 TRILLION to $2 TRILLION valuation. That would instantly make it one of the biggest companies in the US market. But here’s the problem. This is not just an IPO. This is a massive liquidity event. SpaceX $SPCX is now expected to IPO at $135 per share, with 555,555,555 shares available. That means almost $75 BILLION in shares could hit the market. Read that again. $75 BILLION of liquidity could be absorbed on day one. And everyone still thinks this is bullish. Insiders reportedly own around 95% of SpaceX shares. The public float is only around 5%. That means insiders are sitting on more than $1.6 TRILLION of paper wealth. And after the IPO, that paper wealth starts becoming real exit liquidity. Michael Burry already warned about this. He said SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic could raise more money than the 300 biggest IPOs in 2000. And he is not just talking. He is already betting against the AI bubble with a massive short position in $PLTR and $NVDA. So now connect the dots. Meta IPO dumped after the hype. AI stocks are already crowded. SpaceX IPO could pull $75 BILLION of liquidity from the market. Stocks. Crypto. High beta tech. Everything retail is already holding. Most people will see the Elon hype. I see the liquidity drain. This could become one of the biggest insider cashout events in modern market history. I have studied macro for 10 years and called almost every major market top including the October BTC ATH. Follow and turn notifications on. I will post the warning before it hits the headlines.

🚨 WARNING: SPACEX IPO IS A REAL BIG STORM FOR MARKETS!! Everyone thinks $SPCX IPO will be free money. But people thought the same about Meta in 2012. After Meta went public, the stock dumped more than 70% in the first 100 days. Retail bought the hype. Then insiders and early investors got liquidity. Now the same setup is coming again. SpaceX is expected to go public on June 12 at a $1.75 TRILLION to $2 TRILLION valuation. That would instantly make it one of the biggest companies in the US market. But here’s the problem. This is not just an IPO. This is a massive liquidity event. SpaceX $SPCX is now expected to IPO at $135 per share, with 555,555,555 shares available. That means almost $75 BILLION in shares could hit the market. Read that again. $75 BILLION of liquidity could be absorbed on day one. And everyone still thinks this is bullish. Insiders reportedly own around 95% of SpaceX shares. The public float is only around 5%. That means insiders are sitting on more than $1.6 TRILLION of paper wealth. And after the IPO, that paper wealth starts becoming real exit liquidity. Michael Burry already warned about this. He said SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic could raise more money than the 300 biggest IPOs in 2000. And he is not just talking. He is already betting against the AI bubble with a massive short position in $PLTR and $NVDA. So now connect the dots. Meta IPO dumped after the hype. AI stocks are already crowded. SpaceX IPO could pull $75 BILLION of liquidity from the market. Stocks. Crypto. High beta tech. Everything retail is already holding. Most people will see the Elon hype. I see the liquidity drain. This could become one of the biggest insider cashout events in modern market history. I have studied macro for 10 years and called almost every major market top including the October BTC ATH. Follow and turn notifications on. I will post the warning before it hits the headlines.

DANNY

973,666 次观看 • 2 个月前

Ed, on today's show: "Do not buy this stock. SpaceX is going public at a $1.77 trillion valuation, which makes it the largest IPO of all time. My final message before the stock starts trading publicly: do not buy this IPO. The company is dramatically overvalued, and not only that, this is a rigged game, and the game is not rigged in your favor. Here's my prediction for what will happen as soon as it hits the market"...👇

Ed, on today's show: "Do not buy this stock. SpaceX is going public at a $1.77 trillion valuation, which makes it the largest IPO of all time. My final message before the stock starts trading publicly: do not buy this IPO. The company is dramatically overvalued, and not only that, this is a rigged game, and the game is not rigged in your favor. Here's my prediction for what will happen as soon as it hits the market"...👇

Prof G Markets

25,010 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 WARNING: SPACEX IPO IS A REAL BIG STORM FOR MARKETS!! Everyone thinks $SPCX IPO will be free money. But people thought the same about Meta in 2012. After Meta went public, the stock dumped more than 70% in the first 100 days. Retail bought the hype. Then insiders and early investors got liquidity. Now the same setup is coming again. SpaceX is expected to go public on June 12 at a $1.75 TRILLION to $2 TRILLION valuation. That would instantly make it one of the biggest companies in the US market. But here’s the problem. This is not just an IPO. This is a massive liquidity event. SpaceX $SPCX is now expected to IPO at $135 per share, with 555,555,555 shares available. That means almost $75 BILLION in shares could hit the market. Read that again. $75 BILLION of liquidity could be absorbed on day one. And everyone still thinks this is bullish. Insiders reportedly own around 95% of SpaceX shares. The public float is only around 5%. That means insiders are sitting on more than $1.6 TRILLION of paper wealth. And after the IPO, that paper wealth starts becoming real exit liquidity. Michael Burry already warned about this. He said SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic could raise more money than the 300 biggest IPOs in 2000. And he is not just talking. He is already betting against the AI bubble with a massive short position in $PLTR and $NVDA. So now connect the dots. Meta IPO dumped after the hype. AI stocks are already crowded. SpaceX IPO could pull $75 BILLION of liquidity from the market. Stocks. Crypto. High beta tech. Everything retail is already holding. Most people will see the Elon hype. I see the liquidity drain. This could become one of the biggest insider cashout events in modern market history. Follow and turn notifications on. I will post the warning before it hits the headlines.

🚨 WARNING: SPACEX IPO IS A REAL BIG STORM FOR MARKETS!! Everyone thinks $SPCX IPO will be free money. But people thought the same about Meta in 2012. After Meta went public, the stock dumped more than 70% in the first 100 days. Retail bought the hype. Then insiders and early investors got liquidity. Now the same setup is coming again. SpaceX is expected to go public on June 12 at a $1.75 TRILLION to $2 TRILLION valuation. That would instantly make it one of the biggest companies in the US market. But here’s the problem. This is not just an IPO. This is a massive liquidity event. SpaceX $SPCX is now expected to IPO at $135 per share, with 555,555,555 shares available. That means almost $75 BILLION in shares could hit the market. Read that again. $75 BILLION of liquidity could be absorbed on day one. And everyone still thinks this is bullish. Insiders reportedly own around 95% of SpaceX shares. The public float is only around 5%. That means insiders are sitting on more than $1.6 TRILLION of paper wealth. And after the IPO, that paper wealth starts becoming real exit liquidity. Michael Burry already warned about this. He said SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic could raise more money than the 300 biggest IPOs in 2000. And he is not just talking. He is already betting against the AI bubble with a massive short position in $PLTR and $NVDA. So now connect the dots. Meta IPO dumped after the hype. AI stocks are already crowded. SpaceX IPO could pull $75 BILLION of liquidity from the market. Stocks. Crypto. High beta tech. Everything retail is already holding. Most people will see the Elon hype. I see the liquidity drain. This could become one of the biggest insider cashout events in modern market history. Follow and turn notifications on. I will post the warning before it hits the headlines.

WhaleTwits

148,383 次观看 • 1 个月前

SpaceX just filed to go public at $2 trillion. Because it owns the lowest-cost path to orbit and the fastest-growing global internet network on Earth. Starship drops the price per kilogram by 30–300×. That changes everything that touches space, energy, compute, and logistics. The real story is what comes next: the convergence with Tesla and xAI into a single vertically integrated machine. *** thanks to David Carbutt and team for the edit

SpaceX just filed to go public at $2 trillion. Because it owns the lowest-cost path to orbit and the fastest-growing global internet network on Earth. Starship drops the price per kilogram by 30–300×. That changes everything that touches space, energy, compute, and logistics. The real story is what comes next: the convergence with Tesla and xAI into a single vertically integrated machine. *** thanks to David Carbutt and team for the edit

Farzad 🇺🇸 🇮🇷

92,331 次观看 • 3 个月前

We talked with Alex Jacobson (Co-Founder & Managing Partner) about the evolving private markets. "SpaceX gives employees equity and runs tenders regularly so that equity becomes liquidity. Although the liquidity price is lower than public market value, employees know their equity will grow because SpaceX keeps expanding. "The strategy is to give employees certainty that the equity they've been issued will be worth a lot more in the future. That is harder to do in the public markets because everything is perfectly priced. In private markets, if you run your process properly, you can have this very deterministic outcome for your employees."

We talked with Alex Jacobson (Co-Founder & Managing Partner) about the evolving private markets. "SpaceX gives employees equity and runs tenders regularly so that equity becomes liquidity. Although the liquidity price is lower than public market value, employees know their equity will grow because SpaceX keeps expanding. "The strategy is to give employees certainty that the equity they've been issued will be worth a lot more in the future. That is harder to do in the public markets because everything is perfectly priced. In private markets, if you run your process properly, you can have this very deterministic outcome for your employees."

TBPN

11,490 次观看 • 1 年前