Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Why is native Bitcoin still difficult to use as collateral? Because Bitcoin is not programmable. As a result, using Bitcoin in on-chain finance has typically meant handing over your Bitcoin to a third party.

14,462 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Babylon
Babylonvor 2 Monaten

Furthermore, native Bitcoin collateral infrastructure is still maturing. That's where Babylon comes in. Babylon Trustless Bitcoin Vaults (TBV) let native Bitcoin be used as collateral on any chain and in any application, without wrapping, bridging, or intermediaries.

Profilbild von Bunny 🐰
Bunny 🐰vor 2 Monaten

That’s the key problem to solve. Billions in BTC sitting outside DeFi is an infrastructure issue, not a lack of demand. TBV is the game changer here.

Profilbild von Chris
Chrisvor 2 Monaten

Native BTC collateral should be secured by Bitcoin itself, not by trusting an intermediary.

Profilbild von Junryll Kiamqu
Junryll Kiamquvor 2 Monaten

The bigger unlock here is giving BTC a more active role in on-chain finance.🚀

Profilbild von Richard A. BTC
Richard A. BTCvor 2 Monaten

The more native BTC can interact with on-chain finance, the bigger the BTCFi opportunity becomes.

Profilbild von 牛佰腩🪎
牛佰腩🪎vor 2 Monaten

No bridge sounds good, but liquidation is the hard part. When the price suddenly wicks, can native BTC still be liquidated without relying on a third party? #Bitcoin

Profilbild von Katie
Katievor 2 Monaten

Trusted one

Profilbild von M̥ͦr̥ͦ.M̥ͦO̥ͦH̥ͦs̥ͦi̥ͦN̥ͦ
M̥ͦr̥ͦ.M̥ͦO̥ͦH̥ͦs̥ͦi̥ͦN̥ͦvor 2 Monaten

Good

Profilbild von BOYXNX2
BOYXNX2vor 2 Monaten

True, but isn't that the whole point of wrapped BTC? Trust trade-off. What's the non-custodial alternative you're building?

Profilbild von Rosendo Zlaten
Rosendo Zlatenvor 2 Monaten

The lack of programmability is exactly why wrapped assets gained traction in the first place.

Ähnliche Videos