Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Why Kaspa doesn't throw away competing blocks A normal chain picks one block per round and discards the rest as orphans, meaning every miner who lost the race did the work for nothing. Kaspa orders every block instead, including ones mined at the same moment, through GHOSTDAG consensus. That's... show more

BSCN

1,371,541 subscribers

17,425 views • 17 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 CRYPTO: BITCOIN NETWORK HITS RARE TWO-BLOCK REORGANIZATION Not an attack. Not a bug. Just Bitcoin doing what Bitcoin does. The network briefly split into two competing chains today at block height 941,880. AntPool mined one version of block 941,881, ViaBTC extended it to 941,882. Simultaneously, Foundry USA mined its own competing versions of both blocks. The tie was broken when Foundry kept winning. Seven consecutive blocks (941,879 to 941,885). AntPool and ViaBTC's blocks became orphans. Single-block reorgs happen periodically. Two-block reorgs are much rarer, meaning the tie persisted for an entire extra block cycle. Still well within normal consensus behavior. No $BTC or funds lost. No double spends. Just proof-of-work settling a race the way Satoshi designed it.

🚨 CRYPTO: BITCOIN NETWORK HITS RARE TWO-BLOCK REORGANIZATION Not an attack. Not a bug. Just Bitcoin doing what Bitcoin does. The network briefly split into two competing chains today at block height 941,880. AntPool mined one version of block 941,881, ViaBTC extended it to 941,882. Simultaneously, Foundry USA mined its own competing versions of both blocks. The tie was broken when Foundry kept winning. Seven consecutive blocks (941,879 to 941,885). AntPool and ViaBTC's blocks became orphans. Single-block reorgs happen periodically. Two-block reorgs are much rarer, meaning the tie persisted for an entire extra block cycle. Still well within normal consensus behavior. No $BTC or funds lost. No double spends. Just proof-of-work settling a race the way Satoshi designed it.

BSCN

16,507 views • 5 months ago

Kaspa nodes delete most of the chain's history by design Bitcoin nodes store and replay every block back to 2009. #Kaspa takes the opposite approach: nodes keep only recent blocks and discard everything older than a cutoff known as the pruning point. Since the Crescendo upgrade took block production from 1 to 10 per second, that window covers roughly 30 hours of history, down from 50 before, per the official Rusty Kaspa release notes. New nodes sync from the pruning point rather than from the chain's first block. Operators who want a longer archive can set a retention period of at least two days. Every node still keeps the full ledger of unspent coins, so kaspa:native balances stay verifiable without the deleted history.

Kaspa nodes delete most of the chain's history by design Bitcoin nodes store and replay every block back to 2009. #Kaspa takes the opposite approach: nodes keep only recent blocks and discard everything older than a cutoff known as the pruning point. Since the Crescendo upgrade took block production from 1 to 10 per second, that window covers roughly 30 hours of history, down from 50 before, per the official Rusty Kaspa release notes. New nodes sync from the pruning point rather than from the chain's first block. Operators who want a longer archive can set a retention period of at least two days. Every node still keeps the full ledger of unspent coins, so kaspa:native balances stay verifiable without the deleted history.

BSCN

23,459 views • 5 days ago

KASPA'S 2026 PIVOT: PAYMENTS RAIL TO PROGRAMMABLE L1 Kaspa is shifting categories this year. The proof-of-work BlockDAG that runs at 10 blocks per second now has a roadmap pushing it from a fast payments chain into a programmable base layer. Igra Network went live in March as a decentralized EVM execution layer on top of Kaspa, hitting 3,000 transactions per second with 15 protocols deployed at launch and a clean Sigma Prime audit. KAS wraps 1:1 to iKAS as the network's gas token. The Toccata hard fork follows in June. It bundles native KRC-20 tokens, covenants, and zero-knowledge verification opcodes into Layer 1 through a new scripting language called SilverScript. $KAS trades around $0.036 with a $985 million market cap, up 12% on the week. Roughly 95% of the 28.7 billion supply is already mined. DAGKnight consensus is queued for Q3.

KASPA'S 2026 PIVOT: PAYMENTS RAIL TO PROGRAMMABLE L1 Kaspa is shifting categories this year. The proof-of-work BlockDAG that runs at 10 blocks per second now has a roadmap pushing it from a fast payments chain into a programmable base layer. Igra Network went live in March as a decentralized EVM execution layer on top of Kaspa, hitting 3,000 transactions per second with 15 protocols deployed at launch and a clean Sigma Prime audit. KAS wraps 1:1 to iKAS as the network's gas token. The Toccata hard fork follows in June. It bundles native KRC-20 tokens, covenants, and zero-knowledge verification opcodes into Layer 1 through a new scripting language called SilverScript. $KAS trades around $0.036 with a $985 million market cap, up 12% on the week. Roughly 95% of the 28.7 billion supply is already mined. DAGKnight consensus is queued for Q3.

BSCN

13,564 views • 3 months ago

Here's a quick overview of what we can or could expect from #Kaspa in 2025. - At least 10 blocks per second with a PoW BlockDAG - Listings on major exchanges such as #Binance, #OKX or #Coinbase - A stablecoin on the $KAS BlockDAG - DAGKnight as a new consensus mechanism - Possibly smart contracts - And probably more partnerships in the energy sector and other interesting areas All in all, very bullish and, in my opinion, the most exciting year for Kaspa so far. Especially because a lot of people are mainly looking at the price, I am sure that these people will also be very happy soon. What have I forgotten and what do you think will have the biggest impact on KAS?

Here's a quick overview of what we can or could expect from #Kaspa in 2025. - At least 10 blocks per second with a PoW BlockDAG - Listings on major exchanges such as #Binance, #OKX or #Coinbase - A stablecoin on the $KAS BlockDAG - DAGKnight as a new consensus mechanism - Possibly smart contracts - And probably more partnerships in the energy sector and other interesting areas All in all, very bullish and, in my opinion, the most exciting year for Kaspa so far. Especially because a lot of people are mainly looking at the price, I am sure that these people will also be very happy soon. What have I forgotten and what do you think will have the biggest impact on KAS?

KASPA Enthusiast 𐤊

19,368 views • 1 year ago

Daily Boxy Run tournament is live Prizes for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place - every day, through Epoch One Boxy Run runs onchain. One transaction per second per game. The tournament is also a live network test Play at

Daily Boxy Run tournament is live Prizes for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place - every day, through Epoch One Boxy Run runs onchain. One transaction per second per game. The tournament is also a live network test Play at

Unicity

29,330 views • 3 months ago

KASPA HITS MAJOR MILESTONES IN 2026 AS TOCCATA HARD FORK NEARS AND SUPPLY EMISSION WINDS DOWN Kaspa has stacked a series of milestones over the past year as the network transitions from a payments-focused proof-of-work chain to a programmable Layer 1. The Crescendo hard fork pushed the network to 10 blocks per second, with peak loads exceeding 10,000 TPS. While cumulative on-chain transactions are approaching 2 billion. Founder Yonatan Sompolinsky (Yonatan Sompolinsky) took the Kaspa pitch to the Oxford Union in March, a notable mainstream-academic crossover for a fair-launched community project. The Toccata hard fork hit code freeze on April 15 with mainnet activation targeted between June 5 and June 20. Toccata brings native L1 covenant programming via the SilverScript compiler, ZK verification opcodes, KIP-21 partitioned sequencing, and KRC-20 tokens as a base-layer feature. The supply story compounds the upgrade story. Roughly 95.4% of $KAS is already in circulation, with new emission approaching zero by the end of 2026. $KAS trades near $0.0325 with a market cap of around $888 million, with a near-fully distributed supply heading into its biggest programmability upgrade.

KASPA HITS MAJOR MILESTONES IN 2026 AS TOCCATA HARD FORK NEARS AND SUPPLY EMISSION WINDS DOWN Kaspa has stacked a series of milestones over the past year as the network transitions from a payments-focused proof-of-work chain to a programmable Layer 1. The Crescendo hard fork pushed the network to 10 blocks per second, with peak loads exceeding 10,000 TPS. While cumulative on-chain transactions are approaching 2 billion. Founder Yonatan Sompolinsky (Yonatan Sompolinsky) took the Kaspa pitch to the Oxford Union in March, a notable mainstream-academic crossover for a fair-launched community project. The Toccata hard fork hit code freeze on April 15 with mainnet activation targeted between June 5 and June 20. Toccata brings native L1 covenant programming via the SilverScript compiler, ZK verification opcodes, KIP-21 partitioned sequencing, and KRC-20 tokens as a base-layer feature. The supply story compounds the upgrade story. Roughly 95.4% of $KAS is already in circulation, with new emission approaching zero by the end of 2026. $KAS trades near $0.0325 with a market cap of around $888 million, with a near-fully distributed supply heading into its biggest programmability upgrade.

BSCN

14,794 views • 4 months ago

Max Recorded TPS (1 Block) is now on Chainspect! 🚀 So far, we've measured Max Recorded TPS only for a period of 100 blocks. You take the total transactions over the time and divide them by cumulative block time to get at estimate of what TPS a blockchain can churn out consistently during peak workload periods. Now, we're adding the Max Recorded TPS per block. That's the highest-ever burst TPS a chain has handled on record — a measure of its peak performance under high stress. Check out how your fav chain has fared:

Max Recorded TPS (1 Block) is now on Chainspect! 🚀 So far, we've measured Max Recorded TPS only for a period of 100 blocks. You take the total transactions over the time and divide them by cumulative block time to get at estimate of what TPS a blockchain can churn out consistently during peak workload periods. Now, we're adding the Max Recorded TPS per block. That's the highest-ever burst TPS a chain has handled on record — a measure of its peak performance under high stress. Check out how your fav chain has fared:

Chainspect

49,252 views • 1 year ago

I’ve used Ethereum. Waited for gas to drop. Switched wallets. Checked bridges. Paid $30 to move $15. I’ve used Solana. Watched it fly. Then stall. Then restart. I’ve used Bitcoin. Waited. And waited. Trusted, but never instant. Then I found Kaspa. $KAS No one shilled it to me. No “airdrop soon.” No cult. No billion-dollar marketing. Just raw code. And something rare: consistency. I sent a transaction. It confirmed in under 2 seconds. It was final in less than 10. The fee? One ten-thousandth of a dollar. I thought: Wait — that’s it? No bridge. No L2. No delay. No drama. Just finality. Then I looked deeper. 10 blocks per second. A protocol called GhostDAG. A mathematical breakthrough: A network that scales by embracing parallelism — not suppressing it. It doesn’t skip decentralization. It doesn’t shortcut security. And yet it delivers faster-than-internet latency — on a permissionless, open network. I didn’t think Proof-of-Work could feel this smooth. But it does. Because it’s engineered, not marketed. Kaspa is what crypto would look like if it had been designed for people — not investors. Not louder. Just better. Try it once. Then tell me you don’t feel the difference. #Kaspa #BlockchainUX #Crypto #ProofOfWork #GhostDAG #Crescendo

I’ve used Ethereum. Waited for gas to drop. Switched wallets. Checked bridges. Paid $30 to move $15. I’ve used Solana. Watched it fly. Then stall. Then restart. I’ve used Bitcoin. Waited. And waited. Trusted, but never instant. Then I found Kaspa. $KAS No one shilled it to me. No “airdrop soon.” No cult. No billion-dollar marketing. Just raw code. And something rare: consistency. I sent a transaction. It confirmed in under 2 seconds. It was final in less than 10. The fee? One ten-thousandth of a dollar. I thought: Wait — that’s it? No bridge. No L2. No delay. No drama. Just finality. Then I looked deeper. 10 blocks per second. A protocol called GhostDAG. A mathematical breakthrough: A network that scales by embracing parallelism — not suppressing it. It doesn’t skip decentralization. It doesn’t shortcut security. And yet it delivers faster-than-internet latency — on a permissionless, open network. I didn’t think Proof-of-Work could feel this smooth. But it does. Because it’s engineered, not marketed. Kaspa is what crypto would look like if it had been designed for people — not investors. Not louder. Just better. Try it once. Then tell me you don’t feel the difference. #Kaspa #BlockchainUX #Crypto #ProofOfWork #GhostDAG #Crescendo

Kaspa𐤊Fox

80,836 views • 1 year ago

THE CLOUD BILL WAS $14,000 A MONTH. EVERY MONTH. JUST FOR GPU ACCESS. No ownership. No hardware. Just renting someone else's chips and watching the invoice grow. So this startup did the math and bought 1,000 Mac Mini M4s instead. $599 each. One-time. Total: ~$599,000 upfront. Sounds insane. Until you do the math the other way. $14K/mo in cloud GPUs is $168K a year. In 3.5 years you've burned through $599K and own nothing. The meter just keeps running. These guys own the hardware. Same output. Less power draw. And after year 4, every month of compute is basically free. The M4 was never built for data centers. But its performance per watt is so good that someone looked at a rack of a thousand of them and thought "why not." That's when it clicks. The AI infrastructure race isn't about who has the biggest GPU anymore. It's about who figured out they were overpaying for one. Would you make this switch?

THE CLOUD BILL WAS $14,000 A MONTH. EVERY MONTH. JUST FOR GPU ACCESS. No ownership. No hardware. Just renting someone else's chips and watching the invoice grow. So this startup did the math and bought 1,000 Mac Mini M4s instead. $599 each. One-time. Total: ~$599,000 upfront. Sounds insane. Until you do the math the other way. $14K/mo in cloud GPUs is $168K a year. In 3.5 years you've burned through $599K and own nothing. The meter just keeps running. These guys own the hardware. Same output. Less power draw. And after year 4, every month of compute is basically free. The M4 was never built for data centers. But its performance per watt is so good that someone looked at a rack of a thousand of them and thought "why not." That's when it clicks. The AI infrastructure race isn't about who has the biggest GPU anymore. It's about who figured out they were overpaying for one. Would you make this switch?

Framez

18,004 views • 22 days ago

What do $Kaspa and $Apple have in common? Apple wasn’t the first mover in the mobile phone business: Sony, Motorola, Nokia, and others were FAR ahead of them! Yet today, Apple is the market leader (> 20% market share) What makes Apple different? They think different! They built on the shoulders of giants and simplified things in a way their competitors couldn’t. You don’t have to be the first mover! You don’t have to reinvent the wheel. You just need to streamline the solution and customer behavior to the maximum, and you’ll win! The same principle that worked for Apple will now apply to Kaspa. Just as Apple took existing technology and made it more accessible, intuitive, and user-friendly, Kaspa is poised to do the same in its own field. By refining blockchain technology: focusing on speed, scalability and simplicity. Kaspa can take the groundwork laid by earlier cryptocurrencies and elevate it, meeting user needs more effectively than its predecessors. It’s not about being the first; it’s about being the BEST at delivering what people really want. 10bps countdown: ⏳ 34 days to go till 10bps GIGA Thread & Art from KASPArt_Qubicious_Analysis 💪 --> Check him out🫡 If you understand what you're investing in, short-term price fluctuations won't matter to you: • No insiders or VCs • Fair launch • Solves the blockchain trilemma • 2nd biggest Hash rate • Proof-of-Work • Worth $2B without Binance & Coinbase • T1 listings coming soon “Learn” comes before “earn” for a reason. The L stands for losses, and most people can’t stomach enough of them to EVER win. Don't be one of them! #kas #kasarmy #ghostdag #creszendo #kaspa #10bps #smartcontracts #btc

What do $Kaspa and $Apple have in common? Apple wasn’t the first mover in the mobile phone business: Sony, Motorola, Nokia, and others were FAR ahead of them! Yet today, Apple is the market leader (> 20% market share) What makes Apple different? They think different! They built on the shoulders of giants and simplified things in a way their competitors couldn’t. You don’t have to be the first mover! You don’t have to reinvent the wheel. You just need to streamline the solution and customer behavior to the maximum, and you’ll win! The same principle that worked for Apple will now apply to Kaspa. Just as Apple took existing technology and made it more accessible, intuitive, and user-friendly, Kaspa is poised to do the same in its own field. By refining blockchain technology: focusing on speed, scalability and simplicity. Kaspa can take the groundwork laid by earlier cryptocurrencies and elevate it, meeting user needs more effectively than its predecessors. It’s not about being the first; it’s about being the BEST at delivering what people really want. 10bps countdown: ⏳ 34 days to go till 10bps GIGA Thread & Art from KASPArt_Qubicious_Analysis 💪 --> Check him out🫡 If you understand what you're investing in, short-term price fluctuations won't matter to you: • No insiders or VCs • Fair launch • Solves the blockchain trilemma • 2nd biggest Hash rate • Proof-of-Work • Worth $2B without Binance & Coinbase • T1 listings coming soon “Learn” comes before “earn” for a reason. The L stands for losses, and most people can’t stomach enough of them to EVER win. Don't be one of them! #kas #kasarmy #ghostdag #creszendo #kaspa #10bps #smartcontracts #btc

Jens Illgner - Road To Glory Jil

33,835 views • 1 year ago

To finish the series: - Deterministic chain-seeded genetic computation. We ran a chain-seeded genetic optimiser for 32 generations and proved every single step in zero-knowledge, then folded all 32 proofs into one. The whole lineage verifies on Kaspa in a single transaction, post-quantum. You can open the tx and check it yourself. What it is: a tiny program, an evolutionary search over a 16-value genome , that mutates and selects for a lower-cost circuit design, seeded by the Kaspa chain. Over 32 generations it drove its target circuit's scored constraint count down (best target ~72 → ~50; trending down, though it's a sawtooth it rotates through three circuit types). The part that matters: every one of those 32 steps ran inside a zero-knowledge VM and was proven correct a step that didn't compute correctly simply won't verify. Then all 32 step-proofs were folded into ONE. That proof is 222 KB exactly the size of a single step, and it stays that size no matter how many generations you add. (The catch, stated plainly: folding more generations costs the prover more time; only the final proof size is constant.) Kaspa verified the entire 32-generation lineage in one transaction: 7504fa32f74aa028301290299276a707cf98ffc2766b1be0daed4c5c41883f15. Flip a single byte of the proof and the network rejects it, we tried; it's rejected. And the verification path is post-quantum: hash-based the whole way (FRI/Poseidon2 + SHA-256), no elliptic curves or pairings anywhere nothing Shor's algorithm targets.* What this is and isn't: It's a feasibility experiment on testnet. It's deterministic, chain-seeded genetic computation not AI, not intelligence. We drive each step and proved a fixed lineage we chose; it does not yet run itself on-chain (that's the next build). The core, though, is real and checkable: a program's entire computational lineage 32 generations proven correct, post-quantum, verified by Kaspa in a single shot. *STARK security rests on hash assumptions plus the Fiat-Shamir heuristic, not on any pre-quantum hardness.

To finish the series: - Deterministic chain-seeded genetic computation. We ran a chain-seeded genetic optimiser for 32 generations and proved every single step in zero-knowledge, then folded all 32 proofs into one. The whole lineage verifies on Kaspa in a single transaction, post-quantum. You can open the tx and check it yourself. What it is: a tiny program, an evolutionary search over a 16-value genome , that mutates and selects for a lower-cost circuit design, seeded by the Kaspa chain. Over 32 generations it drove its target circuit's scored constraint count down (best target ~72 → ~50; trending down, though it's a sawtooth it rotates through three circuit types). The part that matters: every one of those 32 steps ran inside a zero-knowledge VM and was proven correct a step that didn't compute correctly simply won't verify. Then all 32 step-proofs were folded into ONE. That proof is 222 KB exactly the size of a single step, and it stays that size no matter how many generations you add. (The catch, stated plainly: folding more generations costs the prover more time; only the final proof size is constant.) Kaspa verified the entire 32-generation lineage in one transaction: 7504fa32f74aa028301290299276a707cf98ffc2766b1be0daed4c5c41883f15. Flip a single byte of the proof and the network rejects it, we tried; it's rejected. And the verification path is post-quantum: hash-based the whole way (FRI/Poseidon2 + SHA-256), no elliptic curves or pairings anywhere nothing Shor's algorithm targets.* What this is and isn't: It's a feasibility experiment on testnet. It's deterministic, chain-seeded genetic computation not AI, not intelligence. We drive each step and proved a fixed lineage we chose; it does not yet run itself on-chain (that's the next build). The core, though, is real and checkable: a program's entire computational lineage 32 generations proven correct, post-quantum, verified by Kaspa in a single shot. *STARK security rests on hash assumptions plus the Fiat-Shamir heuristic, not on any pre-quantum hardness.

Kaspa Kii

20,730 views • 2 months ago

Kaspa's Toccata upgrade is seeing real use seven weeks after activation Seven weeks after Kaspa's Toccata hard fork, the upgrade's new machinery is in visible use. Kaspalytics counts 1,196 covenant-creating transactions in the past 24 hours, with over 2,700 covenant outputs created, programmable spending rules now running natively on kaspa:native L1. The ZK side is earlier-stage: just 9 ZK precompile transactions in the same window, split between Groth16 and R0Succinct proof verifications. The clearest adoption signal sits on layer 2. Igra, the EVM-compatible L2 anchored to Kaspa, logged around 54,000 transactions in 24 hours, dwarfing every other protocol on the network, with KRC inscriptions a distant second near 1,900. Miners have moved on cleanly too: 86% of recent blocks come from node version 2.0.1, the post-Toccata release, suggesting the consensus change has settled without a lingering split.

Kaspa's Toccata upgrade is seeing real use seven weeks after activation Seven weeks after Kaspa's Toccata hard fork, the upgrade's new machinery is in visible use. Kaspalytics counts 1,196 covenant-creating transactions in the past 24 hours, with over 2,700 covenant outputs created, programmable spending rules now running natively on kaspa:native L1. The ZK side is earlier-stage: just 9 ZK precompile transactions in the same window, split between Groth16 and R0Succinct proof verifications. The clearest adoption signal sits on layer 2. Igra, the EVM-compatible L2 anchored to Kaspa, logged around 54,000 transactions in 24 hours, dwarfing every other protocol on the network, with KRC inscriptions a distant second near 1,900. Miners have moved on cleanly too: 86% of recent blocks come from node version 2.0.1, the post-Toccata release, suggesting the consensus change has settled without a lingering split.

BSCN

18,168 views • 10 days ago

Anthropic didn't build his memory system. He built it himself, and what you're looking at is the proof. Same source, no gatekeeping. The Obsidian CEO published it, anyone can install it. That's not a screensaver on his second monitor. It's his vault. Every point of light is a note. Every cluster is a project his AI already understands without being told again. He doesn't even touch the keyboard to move through it. One hand up, and the whole cluster tilts and spins, like he's turning a globe that happens to be his own head. A year ago he opened a new AI tab every morning and explained himself from scratch. Who he is, what he's building, what he wants. 200+ hours a year, just re-introducing himself to a machine. Then he stopped writing prompts and started writing one file instead. It loaded before every session. His goals, his projects, his blind spots. Claude read it first, every time, without asking. Now the cluster on that screen keeps growing on its own. New notes link themselves. Nothing gets explained twice. He's not showing off code. He's showing off the machine that finally stopped forgetting him.

Anthropic didn't build his memory system. He built it himself, and what you're looking at is the proof. Same source, no gatekeeping. The Obsidian CEO published it, anyone can install it. That's not a screensaver on his second monitor. It's his vault. Every point of light is a note. Every cluster is a project his AI already understands without being told again. He doesn't even touch the keyboard to move through it. One hand up, and the whole cluster tilts and spins, like he's turning a globe that happens to be his own head. A year ago he opened a new AI tab every morning and explained himself from scratch. Who he is, what he's building, what he wants. 200+ hours a year, just re-introducing himself to a machine. Then he stopped writing prompts and started writing one file instead. It loaded before every session. His goals, his projects, his blind spots. Claude read it first, every time, without asking. Now the cluster on that screen keeps growing on its own. New notes link themselves. Nothing gets explained twice. He's not showing off code. He's showing off the machine that finally stopped forgetting him.

Superior

108,125 views • 1 month ago

i just open sourced the workflow behind $2M AI video productions... i built 7 skills that run the pipeline end to end, built for Seedance 2.5 and they work in Claude Code, Codex, Hermes or any harness (works best with 1080p using Higgsfield CLI) here's how to use them, in order: /setup writes which image and video models you run into your project, once, so every skill reads the same stack /studio-init scaffolds the whole studio as a file tree from one question, the project name /film-breakdown walks your script scene by scene and writes a 22-field card for every shot /reference-board locks your references into a visual bible, a caption on every image and a ban list for the rest /asset-passport writes the exhaustive descriptor every later prompt will quote word for word /stress-test combat-tests each asset and flips it to locked only at 10 out of 10 repeatability /shot-prompt refuses to run until everything in frame is locked, then writes the 15-block prompt and logs every attempt get access to the skills and full breakdown of the pipeline in the article below:

i just open sourced the workflow behind $2M AI video productions... i built 7 skills that run the pipeline end to end, built for Seedance 2.5 and they work in Claude Code, Codex, Hermes or any harness (works best with 1080p using Higgsfield CLI) here's how to use them, in order: /setup writes which image and video models you run into your project, once, so every skill reads the same stack /studio-init scaffolds the whole studio as a file tree from one question, the project name /film-breakdown walks your script scene by scene and writes a 22-field card for every shot /reference-board locks your references into a visual bible, a caption on every image and a ban list for the rest /asset-passport writes the exhaustive descriptor every later prompt will quote word for word /stress-test combat-tests each asset and flips it to locked only at 10 out of 10 repeatability /shot-prompt refuses to run until everything in frame is locked, then writes the 15-block prompt and logs every attempt get access to the skills and full breakdown of the pipeline in the article below:

Machina

59,905 views • 15 days ago

Category Labs is proud to introduce Cadence, our multiple-concurrent-proposers (MCP) consensus protocol that matches the optimal good-case latency of single-leader consensus while supporting arbitrarily short block intervals. When combined with BTX, our design for encrypted mempools, this represents a significant step towards solving the problem of MEV at the protocol level. In nearly every blockchain today, a single party ends up in control of each block: it decides which transactions get in, and can reorder them at will. MCP is the natural fix, but most recent designs pay for it with a separate aggregation phase, adding two extra communication rounds per block. Cadence makes the proposers part of consensus itself. Its fast path finalizes in an optimal three communication rounds, even when proposers are offline. Cadence also offers speculative finality, similar to MonadBFT, after just two rounds, revertible only if a proposer provably equivocated. In a simulation using estimated network delays between Monad mainnet's 200 globally distributed validators, finalization takes 219 ms on average, speculative finality 167 ms. Cadence pushes pipelining to the extreme: each block is proposed and finalized in its own independent consensus instance, without waiting on preceding blocks. The block interval then becomes a protocol parameter that can be arbitrarily small. At our initial target of 100 ms, a transaction waits on average just 50 ms to enter a proposal, and oracle prices, liquidations, and auctions can update every 100 ms. Cadence dynamically throttles the opening of new instances to bound the number of outstanding slots even during periods of network instability. When the network is healthy (under synchrony), a transaction included by an honest proposer can be neither dropped nor deferred (short-term censorship resistance), and no proposer can see the others' proposals in time to react (hiding). We prove both, together with safety and liveness under partial synchrony at the optimal 3f+1 fault bound. The Cadence protocol is modular: each module is simple on its own, and any of them can be swapped out without touching the rest. Cadence also builds on components already being deployed: proposals are disseminated as erasure-coded chunks over Deterministic RaptorCast, now rolling out on Monad, and validators vote on proposal digests, so voting does not wait for the full data to arrive. Start with the interactive tutorial: Full paper: Joint work by Kushal Babel, Fatima Elsheimy, Lioba Heimbach, Mohammad Mussadiq Jalalzai, Tobias Klenze, Jovan Komatovic, Jason Milionis, Mike Setrin, and Victor Shoup.

Category Labs is proud to introduce Cadence, our multiple-concurrent-proposers (MCP) consensus protocol that matches the optimal good-case latency of single-leader consensus while supporting arbitrarily short block intervals. When combined with BTX, our design for encrypted mempools, this represents a significant step towards solving the problem of MEV at the protocol level. In nearly every blockchain today, a single party ends up in control of each block: it decides which transactions get in, and can reorder them at will. MCP is the natural fix, but most recent designs pay for it with a separate aggregation phase, adding two extra communication rounds per block. Cadence makes the proposers part of consensus itself. Its fast path finalizes in an optimal three communication rounds, even when proposers are offline. Cadence also offers speculative finality, similar to MonadBFT, after just two rounds, revertible only if a proposer provably equivocated. In a simulation using estimated network delays between Monad mainnet's 200 globally distributed validators, finalization takes 219 ms on average, speculative finality 167 ms. Cadence pushes pipelining to the extreme: each block is proposed and finalized in its own independent consensus instance, without waiting on preceding blocks. The block interval then becomes a protocol parameter that can be arbitrarily small. At our initial target of 100 ms, a transaction waits on average just 50 ms to enter a proposal, and oracle prices, liquidations, and auctions can update every 100 ms. Cadence dynamically throttles the opening of new instances to bound the number of outstanding slots even during periods of network instability. When the network is healthy (under synchrony), a transaction included by an honest proposer can be neither dropped nor deferred (short-term censorship resistance), and no proposer can see the others' proposals in time to react (hiding). We prove both, together with safety and liveness under partial synchrony at the optimal 3f+1 fault bound. The Cadence protocol is modular: each module is simple on its own, and any of them can be swapped out without touching the rest. Cadence also builds on components already being deployed: proposals are disseminated as erasure-coded chunks over Deterministic RaptorCast, now rolling out on Monad, and validators vote on proposal digests, so voting does not wait for the full data to arrive. Start with the interactive tutorial: Full paper: Joint work by Kushal Babel, Fatima Elsheimy, Lioba Heimbach, Mohammad Mussadiq Jalalzai, Tobias Klenze, Jovan Komatovic, Jason Milionis, Mike Setrin, and Victor Shoup.

Category Labs

251,169 views • 1 month ago

Drop the high reps and endless volume for four to six heavy reps, with at least three rest days a week, and the first month feels like getting away with something. For years you buried yourself under a fatigue that never fully cleared. Every session started a little tired. Every set performed on a muscle still repairing the last beating. Your strongest fibres, the fast-twitch ones carrying nearly all the growth potential, are the first to switch off when you're run down, so you were barely reaching them at all. Take the volume away, give the body real time to recover, and that fatigue finally lifts. The fibres that were hiding come back online. The weights jump. You walk in fresh and walk out stronger, week after week, and assume it's a fluke that will surely end soon. It doesn't end. It feels like a honeymoon because it is one. You spent years married to the fatigue and mistook it for the work.

Drop the high reps and endless volume for four to six heavy reps, with at least three rest days a week, and the first month feels like getting away with something. For years you buried yourself under a fatigue that never fully cleared. Every session started a little tired. Every set performed on a muscle still repairing the last beating. Your strongest fibres, the fast-twitch ones carrying nearly all the growth potential, are the first to switch off when you're run down, so you were barely reaching them at all. Take the volume away, give the body real time to recover, and that fatigue finally lifts. The fibres that were hiding come back online. The weights jump. You walk in fresh and walk out stronger, week after week, and assume it's a fluke that will surely end soon. It doesn't end. It feels like a honeymoon because it is one. You spent years married to the fatigue and mistook it for the work.

Sama Hoole

39,557 views • 1 month ago

mHC from DeepSeek. I implemented it in Excel for my Frontier AI Seminar. What is mHC? mHC stands for Manifold-Constrained Hyper Connections, published just a few days ago. This paper has quickly become the "first paper to read in 2026" for many in the community. Here's the gist: Residual Network = Neural Network + Skip Connections Hyper Connections = 1 skip connection per block to N weighted skip connections per block Manifold-Constrained = Whatever weight values to weights constrained to sum of 1 I always appreciate the DeepSeek team for releasing their work openly and quickly. That said, this paper introduces significantly more terminology than their earlier papers, and I’m not entirely sure who the intended audience is. Just to name a few: - Residual stream - Sinkhorn–Knopp algorithm - Entropically projected matrices - Birkhoff polytope - Doubly stochastic matrices 🤯 It’s a good reminder that open source is not the same as open knowledge—which is why I’d like to unpack mHC by hand, in Excel, in the next Frontier AI Seminar.

mHC from DeepSeek. I implemented it in Excel for my Frontier AI Seminar. What is mHC? mHC stands for Manifold-Constrained Hyper Connections, published just a few days ago. This paper has quickly become the "first paper to read in 2026" for many in the community. Here's the gist: Residual Network = Neural Network + Skip Connections Hyper Connections = 1 skip connection per block to N weighted skip connections per block Manifold-Constrained = Whatever weight values to weights constrained to sum of 1 I always appreciate the DeepSeek team for releasing their work openly and quickly. That said, this paper introduces significantly more terminology than their earlier papers, and I’m not entirely sure who the intended audience is. Just to name a few: - Residual stream - Sinkhorn–Knopp algorithm - Entropically projected matrices - Birkhoff polytope - Doubly stochastic matrices 🤯 It’s a good reminder that open source is not the same as open knowledge—which is why I’d like to unpack mHC by hand, in Excel, in the next Frontier AI Seminar.

Tom Yeh

93,991 views • 7 months ago

When we started Igloo APAC, we had one goal. Capture every Pudgy Penguins moment in a way that does it justice. That’s why RIC | Little Unusual MY was one of our first hires. What he built with Little Unusual Malaysia said everything. Every aftermovie he made was something we were genuinely proud of. And no video comes alive without the right people in it. SYMPHONY 紫匀 and AloeVera brought so much heart to every frame. But I want to take a moment for the people who worked behind the scenes. Suenwins, now at YGG, one of the most dedicated people I have ever worked with. A true wonder woman. @magicross7, a genuine pillar of the Asian penguin community. The energy he brings is unmatched. Ian Lim 🐧, brand new to the team but gave more than anyone could have asked for. Shawn Benedict 🐧✳️, the most underrated one of all. The guy who showed up, did the hard work on the ground, and never once asked for the credit. The muscles behind every event. Most of them have moved on now. And honestly, that makes me proud. 🤍 These people didn’t just do their jobs. They cared. They showed up. They helped build something real from nothing. Paths change. Teams evolve. But the work we did together, and the people who made it happen, will always mean something to me. 🙏 They deserve every public shoutout. Not just one person alone. 👇🏻 full aftermovie at the comment

Aaron Teng 安伦 🐧

19,088 views • 5 months ago

Claude, Obsidian and n8n form a second brain that clears $5,200 months from brand UGC deals. Most creators still open a blank CapCut file and hope the brand brief sticks. That loop dies at $1,800. The stack replaces hope with a closed system. Obsidian holds every brand voice, every past script that hit 400k views, every rejection note. Claude reads the vault through a local project and rewrites the next five UGC packages in 3 minutes. n8n watches the inbox, creates the note, triggers Claude, formats the brief, and drops the finished package into the brand portal while the creator sleeps. No more research tabs. No more “what angle worked last time.” Month 1: build the vault and wire the three tools. Month 2: first automated batch ships. Two brands pay $1,100 total. Month 3: the same loop runs on four brands. Average deal $480. Twelve packages leave. Bank shows $5,200. The second brain does not store notes. It compounds every win into the next model. Script that scored 18% engagement gets tagged. Claude pulls only those tags next run. The model improves without extra prompt engineering. UGC brands pay for consistency, not inspiration. This system delivers the same quality every week at the same speed. Set the vault once. Let the three tools run the rest. If this was useful - follow.

Rugikk

10,318 views • 1 month ago

Thousands of CCTVs. Facial recognition on every corner. A surveillance network so dense it can track a jaywalker in seconds. Yet somehow… children still go missing. If a system this all-seeing still “fails,” what exactly is it seeing — and what is it choosing not to see? People who say “China is one of the safest countries in the world” are usually the ones who walk through society as guests, not locals — Western expats treated like a quiet upper caste. But safety is not measured by how the privileged feel. It’s measured by how anxious parents behave. And in China, look at the schools: crowds of parents and grandparents standing guard at the gates every single day. If the surveillance state is truly that safe, why does every school dismissal look like a mini-evacuation drill? When a country builds a panopticon yet ordinary families still don’t trust it… the question writes itself — is the danger outside, or inside the system?

Thousands of CCTVs. Facial recognition on every corner. A surveillance network so dense it can track a jaywalker in seconds. Yet somehow… children still go missing. If a system this all-seeing still “fails,” what exactly is it seeing — and what is it choosing not to see? People who say “China is one of the safest countries in the world” are usually the ones who walk through society as guests, not locals — Western expats treated like a quiet upper caste. But safety is not measured by how the privileged feel. It’s measured by how anxious parents behave. And in China, look at the schools: crowds of parents and grandparents standing guard at the gates every single day. If the surveillance state is truly that safe, why does every school dismissal look like a mini-evacuation drill? When a country builds a panopticon yet ordinary families still don’t trust it… the question writes itself — is the danger outside, or inside the system?

The Great Translation Movement 大翻译运动

41,497 views • 9 months ago