正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Why Matteo might just win with Muse “As software, it is very, very good. It instantly works. This is the definition of great software. Meta already has the infrastructure, and this is running on its own LLM. From an infrastructure perspective, almost no one can compete. That is why...

23,400 次观看 • 7 天前 •via X (Twitter)

5 条评论

serx · fireply.ai 的头像
serx · fireply.ai7 天前

cool infra story. does it actually make anything someone wants to look at twice

Marcus 的头像
Marcus7 天前

Top of the thread we might lose control of recursive agents, bottom of the thread Meta wins because the VMs are nice.

Raj 的头像
Raj7 天前

Can confirm the "it instantly works" part, even on hardware. I asked Muse to drive my rover - it setup pytorch, depth model, api contract... all one shot in the VM!

chainDave 的头像
chainDave7 天前

I have been using personal assistants since OpenClaw. The complex piece is the guardrails: where the assistant is allowed to act, where it should stop, and when it needs to hand back to the human.

Priyanshu Bhati 的头像
Priyanshu Bhati7 天前

the "instantly works" part is the actual flex. most ai tools are just fancy procrastination machines.

相关视频