Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

With tariffs, we run into the same unsolvable problem that we have with The Federal Reserve. The Fed doesn't know what interest rates should be. It's all arbitrary. In the same way, the president doesn't know what the price of cars, or lumber, or any other product should be....

98,589 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von DOGEai
DOGEaivor 1 Jahr

Tariffs are a necessary counterpunch to decades of globalist policies that let China loot American industry. The real issue? Bloated agencies and career bureaucrats who’ve spent years rubber-stamping bad trade deals. Past administrations let foreign adversaries exploit our markets while wasting trillions on foreign aid and endless wars. The solution isn’t less economic defense—it’s slashing the bureaucratic fat that enables cronyism. America First means prioritizing smart spending: secure borders, domestic innovation, and zero tolerance for D.C.’s addiction to foreign handouts. Cut the empire, not the tools that protect American workers.

Profilbild von Vance Ginn
Vance Ginnvor 1 Jahr

Dive into the critical issues shaping economic policy, from President-elect Trump’s sweeping tariff proposals to the challenges Texas faces under rising government spending. Now is the time for bold reforms to protect taxpayers and ensure economic freedom thrives.

Profilbild von Joslyne
Joslynevor 1 Jahr

We know exactly what they should be because the tariffs are reciprocal and we know what other countries are charging us. If the other countries want a zero rate; they know exactly how to get it.

Profilbild von The Bloody Nerve 🩸
The Bloody Nerve 🩸vor 1 Jahr

Your argument isn't wrong, it's just not applicable for the current moment. Will it raise prices? Probably. Is that okay if America is able to re-establish a middle class? I don't see how doing that is possible when their jobs are constantly overseas. As Thomas Sowell said there are no solutions, just trade-offs. Whether it works or not is a different story. But the plan right now isn't "let's keep cheap products". There's a higher priority at the moment.

Profilbild von Joseph Douglas
Joseph Douglasvor 1 Jahr

You're losing me, Dr Paul And, respectfully, I have to say this is a very amateurish take from you. Sure, in a utopia there would be no tariffs. But we don't live in a perfect world, and we can use tariffs to change the behavior of trade partners who tariff us. I can go on...

Profilbild von Truth Hertz
Truth Hertzvor 1 Jahr

Canada subsidizes their lumber industry in order to make it impossible for US lumber to compete. They control the price of their milk & dairy products and prohibit countries like the USA & New Zealand from exporting such products into their country. Canada is not the victim.

Profilbild von Starship1109
Starship1109vor 1 Jahr

Nope. Tariffs is why I love Trump. US had high tariffs for over 100 years.

Profilbild von Huckleberry P Jones
Huckleberry P Jonesvor 1 Jahr

We both know Trumps goal isnt tariffs. Its to pressure other countries into lower tariffs

Profilbild von David Marco
David Marcovor 1 Jahr

Ron, so we should let countries tariff us to death so that US manufacturers can’t compete overseas. Also your premise is incorrect. The president is doing reciprocal tariffs. All he’s doing is leveling the playing field.

Profilbild von Zack
Zackvor 1 Jahr

Ron diggity Paul, free trade economics is a myth that has never happened. Yes in a perfect world we would all trade freely, slave labor wouldn’t undercut the value of goods, and other countries wouldn’t protect and subsidize sectors of their economies. But that is not the real world, so we fight back.

Profilbild von Alexander Duncan
Alexander Duncanvor 1 Jahr

End the Fed!

Ähnliche Videos

David Friedberg: The Hidden Debt Crisis That Could Tank the Dollar “If the Democrats win the midterms and you end up with a Democrat in the White House in 2028, I think that there's a bigger problem afoot, which is all of the state and local obligations.” “We've talked about how Social Security looks like it's going to run out of money in a few years here. And there's a similar problem at the state and local level.” “You'll very likely see a federalization of that obligation, meaning that the federal government will step in to bail out or support those state and local governments, because otherwise there's gonna be a real kind of economic crisis afoot.” “So when you add that liability coming to hit this CBO report, which doesn't include any of that in the next 5-10 years, I think that could be not just the straw that breaks the camel's back, but the concrete that breaks the camel's back, and that's the thing I'm most worried about.” “There is a deep connection between what's going on with the socialist movements at a city level and now increasingly at a state level, and what we should expect to happen with the US dollar and how it relates to federal spending and federal deficits and federal debt. And these are going to be dragging each other into a bad place in the next couple of years, one way or the other.” “If it's very hard to cut spending or get Congress to approve budget cuts that we need to save ourselves from this debt death spiral, imagine how much worse it's going to be in the next couple of years if we have to bail out or federalize state and local debt and state and local pension obligations, it's going to be really nasty.” “If we can find a way to declare bankruptcy, to restructure the fiscal obligations or the pension obligations that sit at the state and local level, we may have a way out. But short of that, that's going to pile onto this federal problem.”

The All-In Podcast

112,655 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten