Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

WOW‼️Scott Presler is an absolute legend for this. While cleaning up San Francisco, liberals started accosting him and he fired back with a question they can’t answer: “Why are illegal immigrants more important than Americans? Than homeless people sleeping on the streets? WHY?” Dead silence. That one question exposes... show more

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

732,690 subscribers

78,413 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

We all owe Scott Presler a HUGE THANK YOU for the work he did in Swing State Pennsylvania In honor of that work, I’m sharing my favorite ThePersistence clip “Why are illegal immigrants more important than Americans?”

We all owe Scott Presler a HUGE THANK YOU for the work he did in Swing State Pennsylvania In honor of that work, I’m sharing my favorite ThePersistence clip “Why are illegal immigrants more important than Americans?”

Wall Street Apes

1,858,084 views • 1 year ago

“Let me ask you Liberals a question. Why y’all think Trump is racist?” “Trump has done more for black people than our black leaders. Facts.” “Spreading fake news and a bunch of propaganda but none of you Liberals can answer that question.” SPOT ON!! 🔥👇🏼

“Let me ask you Liberals a question. Why y’all think Trump is racist?” “Trump has done more for black people than our black leaders. Facts.” “Spreading fake news and a bunch of propaganda but none of you Liberals can answer that question.” SPOT ON!! 🔥👇🏼

TONY™

54,587 views • 1 year ago

This is the video that changed my life. 4 years ago — while cleaning up trash on the streets of San Francisco — I questioned why democrats choose illegal aliens over American citizens. Thank you for making this go viral.

This is the video that changed my life. 4 years ago — while cleaning up trash on the streets of San Francisco — I questioned why democrats choose illegal aliens over American citizens. Thank you for making this go viral.

ThePersistence

2,515,663 views • 2 years ago

Can ANYBODY explain why akademiks can’t answer this question directly? Charalamagne asks him WHO is the name on all the lawsuits because THEY are the ones responsible, not Roc Nation. But for some odd reason, he refuses to answer the question.

Can ANYBODY explain why akademiks can’t answer this question directly? Charalamagne asks him WHO is the name on all the lawsuits because THEY are the ones responsible, not Roc Nation. But for some odd reason, he refuses to answer the question.

💎🍾

175,930 views • 1 month ago

🚨WOW: A young British girl just asked the question that should haunt every politician: “Why aren’t they protecting us the British people who are suffering from illegal immigrants who are hurting us?” This child’s words cut deeper than any knife. This is what the fight is really about: the safety of all our children.

🚨WOW: A young British girl just asked the question that should haunt every politician: “Why aren’t they protecting us the British people who are suffering from illegal immigrants who are hurting us?” This child’s words cut deeper than any knife. This is what the fight is really about: the safety of all our children.

The British Patriot

818,538 views • 8 months ago

Why won’t LA County release this year’s homeless count? Orange, San Francisco, and San Diego counties have all released their counts on time. The federal government and a federal judge have ruled that there is nothing prohibiting LAHSA from releasing the numbers. Are we dealing with a cover-up? Is it because it’s an election year? We need answers immediately when we are spending billions of dollars while vulnerable people continue sleeping and dying on our streets.

Why won’t LA County release this year’s homeless count? Orange, San Francisco, and San Diego counties have all released their counts on time. The federal government and a federal judge have ruled that there is nothing prohibiting LAHSA from releasing the numbers. Are we dealing with a cover-up? Is it because it’s an election year? We need answers immediately when we are spending billions of dollars while vulnerable people continue sleeping and dying on our streets.

Rick J. Caruso

15,447 views • 1 month ago

Democrats seem to hate President Trump so much more than they love America that they would root against their own country in the war with Iran... WHY?! We have data to answer this question: The majority of conservatives and Republicans are proud to be Americans. The majority of Democrats are not.

Democrats seem to hate President Trump so much more than they love America that they would root against their own country in the war with Iran... WHY?! We have data to answer this question: The majority of conservatives and Republicans are proud to be Americans. The majority of Democrats are not.

Scott Jennings

352,959 views • 3 months ago

#BREAKING: Psaki opener: “Today many Americans, maybe a lot of you watching right now, are understandably wondering why he did this [#Maduro capture], and you will not be shocked to learn that the Trump administration does NOT have a clear answer for that question, and you will also not be shocked to learn that they DON’T have a clear answer on the incredibly important question of what comes next…”🤦‍♀️

#BREAKING: Psaki opener: “Today many Americans, maybe a lot of you watching right now, are understandably wondering why he did this [#Maduro capture], and you will not be shocked to learn that the Trump administration does NOT have a clear answer for that question, and you will also not be shocked to learn that they DON’T have a clear answer on the incredibly important question of what comes next…”🤦‍♀️

Emoluments Clause

86,134 views • 7 months ago

Question: There is a section of the fanbase that will say the wrong guy was fired. And that would be more of an indictment on the roster than on the coaching. What would you say about the roster and the people who think the roster isn't good enough and that's why this team has fallen short? Brandon Beane:

Question: There is a section of the fanbase that will say the wrong guy was fired. And that would be more of an indictment on the roster than on the coaching. What would you say about the roster and the people who think the roster isn't good enough and that's why this team has fallen short? Brandon Beane:

Matthew Bové

144,781 views • 6 months ago

🚨 THEY DON'T WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE CAUSE. THEY WANT TO TALK ABOUT ELON MUSK. Taoiseach Micheál Martin says Elon Musk should "butt out" because his comments are "creating tensions." But many people are asking a different question: Why are politicians more concerned about what is being said on X than the public anger that is erupting on the streets? Attacking Elon Musk is easier than addressing the policies that have brought Ireland and Northern Ireland to this point. That's why the debate is becoming increasingly difficult for the establishment to control.

🚨 THEY DON'T WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE CAUSE. THEY WANT TO TALK ABOUT ELON MUSK. Taoiseach Micheál Martin says Elon Musk should "butt out" because his comments are "creating tensions." But many people are asking a different question: Why are politicians more concerned about what is being said on X than the public anger that is erupting on the streets? Attacking Elon Musk is easier than addressing the policies that have brought Ireland and Northern Ireland to this point. That's why the debate is becoming increasingly difficult for the establishment to control.

Jim Ferguson

11,015 views • 2 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: Dr Saeed Khatibzadeh, Iran's Dy Minister of Foreign Affairs, says, "My country is under attack based on flat lies that Iran was imposing a threat...Why the Americans and Israelis started aggression against Iran is an important question. If you pose this question to the American administration, based on the different markets and audience you will get different answers...Why they started this is due to power politics and delusion of a ‘Greater Israel..."

#WATCH | Delhi: Dr Saeed Khatibzadeh, Iran's Dy Minister of Foreign Affairs, says, "My country is under attack based on flat lies that Iran was imposing a threat...Why the Americans and Israelis started aggression against Iran is an important question. If you pose this question to the American administration, based on the different markets and audience you will get different answers...Why they started this is due to power politics and delusion of a ‘Greater Israel..."

ANI

121,696 views • 5 months ago

🚨SCOTT PRESLER DEMANDS SENATE FLOOR VOTE ON SAVE ACT. Grassroots activist Scott Presler is rallying millions of Americans to contact their Senators and force an immediate floor vote to mandate proof of U.S. citizenship for federal elections. "We are forcing them to lift that veil and tell the American people why they are against what 84% of us support." — Scott Presler NO MORE EXCUSES! PASS THE SAVE ACT NOW! 🇺🇸🔥📜 As of today, how much do you still trust and support Scott Presler?

🚨SCOTT PRESLER DEMANDS SENATE FLOOR VOTE ON SAVE ACT. Grassroots activist Scott Presler is rallying millions of Americans to contact their Senators and force an immediate floor vote to mandate proof of U.S. citizenship for federal elections. "We are forcing them to lift that veil and tell the American people why they are against what 84% of us support." — Scott Presler NO MORE EXCUSES! PASS THE SAVE ACT NOW! 🇺🇸🔥📜 As of today, how much do you still trust and support Scott Presler?

Red Eagle Updates 🦅🇺🇸

19,986 views • 19 days ago

One thing everyone should appreciate about Spencer Pratt is that when he’s asked a question, he doesn’t deflect. He just answers the question This is so different than basically everyone else in politics CNN asks him, why he’s a Republican He doesn’t dance around the real reason, even through many democrats likely wouldn’t like the answer It’s for the second amendment But then he explains exactly why. It makes perfect sense He explains his plan to protect schools from fun threats even thought he’s for the second amendment and having a gun to protect yourself He has a real, and clear plan One other thing I notice here is CNN asks the question and lets him answer. They don’t push back with propaganda, they just ask a few questions for more clarity This is what the media used to be, and should be. Good job Spencer and CNN for this exchange

One thing everyone should appreciate about Spencer Pratt is that when he’s asked a question, he doesn’t deflect. He just answers the question This is so different than basically everyone else in politics CNN asks him, why he’s a Republican He doesn’t dance around the real reason, even through many democrats likely wouldn’t like the answer It’s for the second amendment But then he explains exactly why. It makes perfect sense He explains his plan to protect schools from fun threats even thought he’s for the second amendment and having a gun to protect yourself He has a real, and clear plan One other thing I notice here is CNN asks the question and lets him answer. They don’t push back with propaganda, they just ask a few questions for more clarity This is what the media used to be, and should be. Good job Spencer and CNN for this exchange

Wall Street Apes

22,869 views • 2 months ago

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.

Simon Ateba

997,322 views • 2 years ago

While the US talks of peace they are building an entire Armada in the gulf. The United States has now deployed more than 50,000 troops across the Middle East, with numbers continuing to surge. Did anyone question why the ceasefire is only for two weeks? What happens after two weeks?

While the US talks of peace they are building an entire Armada in the gulf. The United States has now deployed more than 50,000 troops across the Middle East, with numbers continuing to surge. Did anyone question why the ceasefire is only for two weeks? What happens after two weeks?

Syrian Girl

65,974 views • 4 months ago

⚾️ Great question. While I can’t comment on why exactly he tripped in that spot and whether it had anything to do with the field or just following awkwardly, The area around each base is secured to the ground by Velcro rather than glue Here’s why:

⚾️ Great question. While I can’t comment on why exactly he tripped in that spot and whether it had anything to do with the field or just following awkwardly, The area around each base is secured to the ground by Velcro rather than glue Here’s why:

David Edelstein 🌐

39,162 views • 3 months ago

This is one of the most important Robert Greene clips you’ll watch all year. “We have a hunger for something larger than just our egos… than just making money… than just surviving.” He explains why modern society feels emptier than ever, why people are searching for meaning again, and why “data and algorithms” alone will never fulfill human beings. “If you can’t feel awe in front of this universe… you might as well be dead.” Must watch.

This is one of the most important Robert Greene clips you’ll watch all year. “We have a hunger for something larger than just our egos… than just making money… than just surviving.” He explains why modern society feels emptier than ever, why people are searching for meaning again, and why “data and algorithms” alone will never fulfill human beings. “If you can’t feel awe in front of this universe… you might as well be dead.” Must watch.

TRIGGERnometry

36,045 views • 3 months ago

PONDER THIS… Have you ever noticed that when shit goes down, people demand that minorities be held responsible for their entire ethnic group? White folks are exempt from that demand. When a Black person does something bad, the entire Black community must answer for it. Why is that? Why are we holding all Latinos responsible for Trump when they’re only 13% of the electorate, and less than 50% of that group voted for him? White people are 70% of the electorate and vote for Trump more than 50% of the time. (1 of 2)

PONDER THIS… Have you ever noticed that when shit goes down, people demand that minorities be held responsible for their entire ethnic group? White folks are exempt from that demand. When a Black person does something bad, the entire Black community must answer for it. Why is that? Why are we holding all Latinos responsible for Trump when they’re only 13% of the electorate, and less than 50% of that group voted for him? White people are 70% of the electorate and vote for Trump more than 50% of the time. (1 of 2)

Christopher Webb

92,570 views • 1 year ago

A BBC interviewer asked a Nobel physicist the simplest question in the world: why do two magnets push each other apart. He refused to answer it. What he did instead is the best seven minutes on thinking ever filmed. The man is Richard Feynman, at home in 1983, no blackboard, no notes, sitting in an armchair. He does not dodge because he cannot answer. He dodges because he wants you to see what the question is actually asking. So he takes an ordinary sentence, that a woman slipped on the ice and broke her hip, and starts asking why, and every answer opens another why, until the ground gives way. Then he turns it around on the interviewer with a question about ice that sounds trivial and is not. The point he arrives at is the uncomfortable one. Every explanation is only a translation into something you already accept without explanation. Magnets have no such translation. There is nothing more familiar than magnetism to reduce magnetism to, which is why every answer you were given at school was a picture, not a reason. It matters more now than it did in 1983. Any tool will hand you a fluent answer in a second. Knowing which questions actually have a bottom is the part that is still yours. One question. Seven minutes. It is in the video.

A BBC interviewer asked a Nobel physicist the simplest question in the world: why do two magnets push each other apart. He refused to answer it. What he did instead is the best seven minutes on thinking ever filmed. The man is Richard Feynman, at home in 1983, no blackboard, no notes, sitting in an armchair. He does not dodge because he cannot answer. He dodges because he wants you to see what the question is actually asking. So he takes an ordinary sentence, that a woman slipped on the ice and broke her hip, and starts asking why, and every answer opens another why, until the ground gives way. Then he turns it around on the interviewer with a question about ice that sounds trivial and is not. The point he arrives at is the uncomfortable one. Every explanation is only a translation into something you already accept without explanation. Magnets have no such translation. There is nothing more familiar than magnetism to reduce magnetism to, which is why every answer you were given at school was a picture, not a reason. It matters more now than it did in 1983. Any tool will hand you a fluent answer in a second. Knowing which questions actually have a bottom is the part that is still yours. One question. Seven minutes. It is in the video.

Stefan.

2,707,125 views • 17 days ago

The most painful moment of the night occurred when Kamala Harris crumbled for two minutes straight on a question about why Americans are unhappy with the direction the country is moving in. Kamala revealed that doesn't have one useful thing to say other than to belittle Donald Trump. This moment was an absolute train wreck because it made Kamala look like an NPC that could only provide pre-programmed answers.

The most painful moment of the night occurred when Kamala Harris crumbled for two minutes straight on a question about why Americans are unhappy with the direction the country is moving in. Kamala revealed that doesn't have one useful thing to say other than to belittle Donald Trump. This moment was an absolute train wreck because it made Kamala look like an NPC that could only provide pre-programmed answers.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

627,180 views • 1 year ago