正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

WTF, THAT'S UNBELIEVABLE, 7 GROK BOT AGENTS SOLVED A $10,000-A-MONTH PROBLEM IN ONE EVENING For years anyone serious about content hit the same wall: it isn't one job, it's six. Research, writing, visuals, analysis, timing, publishing. One person doing all six ships once a week and burns out. Hiring...

ScottyBeamIO's profile picture

SCOTTY BEAM

77,530 subscribers

12,102 次观看 • 3 天前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

BlackRock runs on 20,000 people. Elon's Grok Bot runs the same shape for $300 a month, and it hires its own staff. You do not get an assistant. You get a company that hires. It does not throw ten agents at your problem and hand you the pile. It makes one agent that makes 10, and those ten make a 100. > LAYER ONE is one agent, the chief of staff, and it never touches the market > LAYER TWO is six desk heads, one job each, every one on its own computer with its own logins > LAYER THREE is whatever those six decide they need, spun up on the spot and shut down when the work is done Nobody writes a task list. You hand out job titles and the org fills itself in underneath. The swarm is never the same twice. Agents get spun up for one job, finish it, and are gone before I ever read their names. Not one of them sees the whole picture. The answer only exists after they hand off to each other. Wall Street cannot copy that. You cannot hire a hundred people for eleven minutes. BlackRock holds that shape together with a risk system called Aladdin. Mine holds it together with one agent that is only allowed to say no. I gave it $1,000 and told it to grow the money or get deleted. 15 hours later it was holding $3,900, on an address anyone can open and read. I was asleep for most of it, and I have still not written a line of code. The whole thing runs with my laptop shut, because none of it lives on my laptop. Setup is one evening. Create the chief, hand out the titles, run one trade on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Ten years ago a machine this shape had its name on a tower. Mine has a name I typed into a box. Save this while the whole thing still fits on one screen.
0:45

BlackRock runs on 20,000 people. Elon's Grok Bot runs the same shape for $300 a month, and it hires its own staff. You do not get an assistant. You get a company that hires. It does not throw ten agents at your problem and hand you the pile. It makes one agent that makes 10, and those ten make a 100. > LAYER ONE is one agent, the chief of staff, and it never touches the market > LAYER TWO is six desk heads, one job each, every one on its own computer with its own logins > LAYER THREE is whatever those six decide they need, spun up on the spot and shut down when the work is done Nobody writes a task list. You hand out job titles and the org fills itself in underneath. The swarm is never the same twice. Agents get spun up for one job, finish it, and are gone before I ever read their names. Not one of them sees the whole picture. The answer only exists after they hand off to each other. Wall Street cannot copy that. You cannot hire a hundred people for eleven minutes. BlackRock holds that shape together with a risk system called Aladdin. Mine holds it together with one agent that is only allowed to say no. I gave it $1,000 and told it to grow the money or get deleted. 15 hours later it was holding $3,900, on an address anyone can open and read. I was asleep for most of it, and I have still not written a line of code. The whole thing runs with my laptop shut, because none of it lives on my laptop. Setup is one evening. Create the chief, hand out the titles, run one trade on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Ten years ago a machine this shape had its name on a tower. Mine has a name I typed into a box. Save this while the whole thing still fits on one screen.

cvxv666

45,488 次观看 • 12 天前

WTF, WHY IS NOBODY TELLING YOU TO SET THIS UP TODAY? SEVEN AGENTS, ZERO CODE, ONE EVENING. Start using Grok Bot for content today. Not next month. Today. The gap between the people who did and the people who kept meaning to is already visible on this timeline. Nothing about your ideas has to change. What changes is how many of them actually get out. Almost nobody has an idea problem – they have a shipping problem, and shipping is exactly the part a machine is better at than you. The setup is seven agents: a Chief of Staff routing every task, a Researcher pulling real sources, a Writer turning them into finished copy in your voice, a Visualiser producing every image in your style, an Analyst reading what actually performed, a Scheduler owning the timing, a Publisher shipping it. You approve. That's the whole job now. More output → more surface area → more of everything that follows from being seen. Full guide, the one Elon reposted, in the article below ↓
0:36

WTF, WHY IS NOBODY TELLING YOU TO SET THIS UP TODAY? SEVEN AGENTS, ZERO CODE, ONE EVENING. Start using Grok Bot for content today. Not next month. Today. The gap between the people who did and the people who kept meaning to is already visible on this timeline. Nothing about your ideas has to change. What changes is how many of them actually get out. Almost nobody has an idea problem – they have a shipping problem, and shipping is exactly the part a machine is better at than you. The setup is seven agents: a Chief of Staff routing every task, a Researcher pulling real sources, a Writer turning them into finished copy in your voice, a Visualiser producing every image in your style, an Analyst reading what actually performed, a Scheduler owning the timing, a Publisher shipping it. You approve. That's the whole job now. More output → more surface area → more of everything that follows from being seen. Full guide, the one Elon reposted, in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

31,146 次观看 • 7 天前

Someone just posted the full blueprint for an AI swarm that does the job of a 200-person quant research team. Six agents. Running 24/7. Finding brand-new alpha while you sleep. Citadel needs 100 PhDs to do this. Two Sigma needs 200. This does it with six bots and one laptop. Two ways to play this - spend a weekend building your own swarm, or copy the wallet of one that's already up $2M: Boris Cherny runs Claude Code at Anthropic. Two weeks ago he said: "I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude. My job is to write loops" Alpha research is just a pipeline. So instead of sitting in it, you hand each stage to its own agent: > one reads every new research paper overnight and pulls out the trade idea > one builds the features and cleans the data > one backtests it over 20 years, costs and slippage included > one runs the hard stats and kills anything overfit > one checks it still works in every market regime > one strips out plain momentum and value to see if any real edge is left Each of those six is a job a fund pays a $600,000-a-year quant to do. He runs all six for the price of an API bill. The rule that makes it work: the agent that builds a signal never gets to approve it. A separate, stronger agent tries to kill it first. Whatever survives all six by morning is real, new alpha. One trader's already running this exact swarm on Polymarket. That $2M wallet is public, every trade on-chain. The full build is in the post below - six agents, the tool that runs them, and the five mistakes that kill most people. Bookmark & read this before it's buried.
0:41

Someone just posted the full blueprint for an AI swarm that does the job of a 200-person quant research team. Six agents. Running 24/7. Finding brand-new alpha while you sleep. Citadel needs 100 PhDs to do this. Two Sigma needs 200. This does it with six bots and one laptop. Two ways to play this - spend a weekend building your own swarm, or copy the wallet of one that's already up $2M: Boris Cherny runs Claude Code at Anthropic. Two weeks ago he said: "I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude. My job is to write loops" Alpha research is just a pipeline. So instead of sitting in it, you hand each stage to its own agent: > one reads every new research paper overnight and pulls out the trade idea > one builds the features and cleans the data > one backtests it over 20 years, costs and slippage included > one runs the hard stats and kills anything overfit > one checks it still works in every market regime > one strips out plain momentum and value to see if any real edge is left Each of those six is a job a fund pays a $600,000-a-year quant to do. He runs all six for the price of an API bill. The rule that makes it work: the agent that builds a signal never gets to approve it. A separate, stronger agent tries to kill it first. Whatever survives all six by morning is real, new alpha. One trader's already running this exact swarm on Polymarket. That $2M wallet is public, every trade on-chain. The full build is in the post below - six agents, the tool that runs them, and the five mistakes that kill most people. Bookmark & read this before it's buried.

cvxv666

103,734 次观看 • 2 个月前

OH F*CK, I RAN AN ENTIRE OPERATION OFF ONE $40 SEAT! grok bot, xai's agents each with own always-on computer in the cloud, a browser and a terminal, signed into my real tools i gave six of them job titles instead of prompts research > drafting > outreach > ops > finance > support, one narrow charter each nothing overlapping i showed one of them a task once while it watched it's own screen it saved the whole flow as a named skill and now fires it the moment a matching email lands / no plugin for a tool? the bot drives it's own browser until it hits a login wall, hands me the screen, then resumes in that session, so it holds a session and never a password / xai, aug 21: grok bot now ships with all supergrok plus, cursor pro + and cursor teams plans / cursor's own pricing page lists team at $40 / user / mo, with "access to grok bot" on both team tiers / cursor pro at $20 still doen't get it pro+ is where the individual floor moved to
0:29

OH F*CK, I RAN AN ENTIRE OPERATION OFF ONE $40 SEAT! grok bot, xai's agents each with own always-on computer in the cloud, a browser and a terminal, signed into my real tools i gave six of them job titles instead of prompts research > drafting > outreach > ops > finance > support, one narrow charter each nothing overlapping i showed one of them a task once while it watched it's own screen it saved the whole flow as a named skill and now fires it the moment a matching email lands / no plugin for a tool? the bot drives it's own browser until it hits a login wall, hands me the screen, then resumes in that session, so it holds a session and never a password / xai, aug 21: grok bot now ships with all supergrok plus, cursor pro + and cursor teams plans / cursor's own pricing page lists team at $40 / user / mo, with "access to grok bot" on both team tiers / cursor pro at $20 still doen't get it pro+ is where the individual floor moved to

dunik

11,496 次观看 • 18 天前

GPT6-Astra turned $500 into $5,110 on my trading account last night. Six AI agents, 0.4 seconds a round, and I was asleep for all of it. 255 setups came up. 1,151 configs died. One trade reached my money. The agent holding the veto killed 4 of the last 5. I don't get a vote either. You have the same model open in a tab right now. You're using it to ask whether the market looks bullish. Six seats, one evening, and the whole roster fits in six prompts. The names and the rules they run on are in the post below ↓
0:43

GPT6-Astra turned $500 into $5,110 on my trading account last night. Six AI agents, 0.4 seconds a round, and I was asleep for all of it. 255 setups came up. 1,151 configs died. One trade reached my money. The agent holding the veto killed 4 of the last 5. I don't get a vote either. You have the same model open in a tab right now. You're using it to ask whether the market looks bullish. Six seats, one evening, and the whole roster fits in six prompts. The names and the rules they run on are in the post below ↓

cvxv666

257,046 次观看 • 2 天前

A SpaceXAI engineer just released a free 30-min course on Grok Bot Agents: from your first persistent agent to multi-agent chains that research, ship software, and hand work off to Cursor 05:26 - what actually lives inside a Grok agent 08:49 - the 3 ways to run agents 12:04 - chaining multiple agents into one workflow 16:06 - turning X followers into structured research inside Notion 23:08 - handing coding work from Grok straight to Cursor Most people still treat Grok like a chat window. It answers, you copy, you move on. The shift happens when the agents stop waiting for you: one finds the information, one structures it in Notion, one turns it into working code, and they pass the work down the line on their own. Thirty minutes here beats assembling your setup one agent at a time.
28:21

A SpaceXAI engineer just released a free 30-min course on Grok Bot Agents: from your first persistent agent to multi-agent chains that research, ship software, and hand work off to Cursor 05:26 - what actually lives inside a Grok agent 08:49 - the 3 ways to run agents 12:04 - chaining multiple agents into one workflow 16:06 - turning X followers into structured research inside Notion 23:08 - handing coding work from Grok straight to Cursor Most people still treat Grok like a chat window. It answers, you copy, you move on. The shift happens when the agents stop waiting for you: one finds the information, one structures it in Notion, one turns it into working code, and they pass the work down the line on their own. Thirty minutes here beats assembling your setup one agent at a time.

Morlex

16,710 次观看 • 14 天前

WTF, GROK BOT JUST MADE AI AGENTS AVAILABLE TO LITERALLY ANYONE – CREATING CONTENT HAS NEVER BEEN THIS EASY, EVEN IF YOU'VE NEVER MADE ANYTHING BEFORE Content was never a talent problem. It's a headcount problem. One person doing research, design, copy, analytics, timing and publishing – that's six jobs. The switching between them is what kills consistency, not a lack of ideas. Here's what one of these setups actually looks like. A Chief of Staff sits in the middle and routes every task. Nothing lands on the human. → Researcher tracks what's actually moving and pulls real sources instead of guesswork → Writer turns that research into finished copy, ready to review → Visualiser gets fed a few reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style → Analyst reads the numbers and tells the rest of the team what worked → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher ships it The part that makes it work: every agent on Grok Bot gets its own persistent computer, browser and file system – and they all share memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools. No approving every step. No human in the middle. You can even teach an agent a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it once. Start recording, do the thing, stop. It learns the pattern. And that's the real shift. Nobody needs AI to tell them what to post. They need it to delete the 40 steps between the idea and the post. Everyone has a backlog of things they've meant to make for months. This is what starts clearing it. Full breakdown of the setup in the article below ↓
0:20

WTF, GROK BOT JUST MADE AI AGENTS AVAILABLE TO LITERALLY ANYONE – CREATING CONTENT HAS NEVER BEEN THIS EASY, EVEN IF YOU'VE NEVER MADE ANYTHING BEFORE Content was never a talent problem. It's a headcount problem. One person doing research, design, copy, analytics, timing and publishing – that's six jobs. The switching between them is what kills consistency, not a lack of ideas. Here's what one of these setups actually looks like. A Chief of Staff sits in the middle and routes every task. Nothing lands on the human. → Researcher tracks what's actually moving and pulls real sources instead of guesswork → Writer turns that research into finished copy, ready to review → Visualiser gets fed a few reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style → Analyst reads the numbers and tells the rest of the team what worked → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher ships it The part that makes it work: every agent on Grok Bot gets its own persistent computer, browser and file system – and they all share memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools. No approving every step. No human in the middle. You can even teach an agent a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it once. Start recording, do the thing, stop. It learns the pattern. And that's the real shift. Nobody needs AI to tell them what to post. They need it to delete the 40 steps between the idea and the post. Everyone has a backlog of things they've meant to make for months. This is what starts clearing it. Full breakdown of the setup in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

4,816,320 次观看 • 24 天前

WHOEVER BUILT THIS GROK BOT TRADING SWARM KNEW EXACTLY WHAT THEY WERE DOING 300 AGENTS DON’T NEED TO RUN 24/7. They just need to show up, analyze the market, finish the job, and disappear. Grok bot makes the decision. Kimi spins up the swarm. Then the agents attack the market from different angles: 300 agents → market data + news + on-chain signals → 140+ connected sources → contradictions surfaced → one consolidated trading signal One agent finds a setup. Another challenges it. A third checks the underlying data. Another runs the risk analysis. The system keeps the conflicting signals instead of blindly trusting the first answer. Then everything gets merged back into one trading decision. That’s the part people miss. The 300 agents aren’t the breakthrough. The coordination is. This is what a Grok powered AI trading desk starts looking like. FULL GUIDE ON HOW TO SET IT UP BELOW
0:40

WHOEVER BUILT THIS GROK BOT TRADING SWARM KNEW EXACTLY WHAT THEY WERE DOING 300 AGENTS DON’T NEED TO RUN 24/7. They just need to show up, analyze the market, finish the job, and disappear. Grok bot makes the decision. Kimi spins up the swarm. Then the agents attack the market from different angles: 300 agents → market data + news + on-chain signals → 140+ connected sources → contradictions surfaced → one consolidated trading signal One agent finds a setup. Another challenges it. A third checks the underlying data. Another runs the risk analysis. The system keeps the conflicting signals instead of blindly trusting the first answer. Then everything gets merged back into one trading decision. That’s the part people miss. The 300 agents aren’t the breakthrough. The coordination is. This is what a Grok powered AI trading desk starts looking like. FULL GUIDE ON HOW TO SET IT UP BELOW

MAX

38,807 次观看 • 10 天前

Elon's Grok Bot runs an entire trading desk for $300 a month. The person who does that job at Goldman starts at $200,000. Mine took $1,000 to $3,900 on day one, out of a wallet anyone can open and read. Most of the build is not about making it trade. It is about stopping it. Every agent's job description ends with a list of what it may never do without asking me first. One of the six is not allowed to trade at all. Its entire job is killing what the other five found, and its no beats every score on the desk. The one that makes the final call never touches the market either. You could have this running by Friday. Most people reading this will not, and in a few months they will be paying somebody who did. The whole build is in the post below ↓ Save it while it still sounds strange. Give it a quarter and this is just how a retail account works.
0:45

Elon's Grok Bot runs an entire trading desk for $300 a month. The person who does that job at Goldman starts at $200,000. Mine took $1,000 to $3,900 on day one, out of a wallet anyone can open and read. Most of the build is not about making it trade. It is about stopping it. Every agent's job description ends with a list of what it may never do without asking me first. One of the six is not allowed to trade at all. Its entire job is killing what the other five found, and its no beats every score on the desk. The one that makes the final call never touches the market either. You could have this running by Friday. Most people reading this will not, and in a few months they will be paying somebody who did. The whole build is in the post below ↓ Save it while it still sounds strange. Give it a quarter and this is just how a retail account works.

cvxv666

207,030 次观看 • 14 天前

While AI timeline argues about loop engineering, a 20-year-old student in Shenzhen built the biggest loop anyone's aimed at money: 300 agents, one brain, $1,200 -> 395,000. Not a prompt. Not a bot. A loop that runs the whole job on its own - and never asks him a thing. No fund. No backers. Just a laptop, a dorm room, and a bet that a swarm beats a genius. His wallet: The smartest single model still works one step at a time. His loop moves in 300 directions at once - and never checks in with him. Claude Opus 4.8 runs the floor as the brain. 300 agents are the hands. One loop ties them together: > Decompose - Opus breaks the market into targets > Dispatch - 300 agents scatter across them at once > Execute - thousands of reads in a single pass, not one by one > Review - Opus grades every edge before a cent moves The hands find. The brain judges. The loop learns what failed and runs again, tighter each time. One daily loss cap, and it shuts itself down. It's not a bot you babysit. It's a loop that runs the whole desk. Everyone's just learning to run one loop. He runs 300 in one. The edge was never the genius model - it's the size of the loop, and the brain in charge of it. Save this - the full 300-agent loop is laid out above, start to finish. You'll want it when you build your own. 300 agents are looping right now, hunting the markets everyone skips. Two clicks and their trades land in your wallet too:
0:53

While AI timeline argues about loop engineering, a 20-year-old student in Shenzhen built the biggest loop anyone's aimed at money: 300 agents, one brain, $1,200 -> 395,000. Not a prompt. Not a bot. A loop that runs the whole job on its own - and never asks him a thing. No fund. No backers. Just a laptop, a dorm room, and a bet that a swarm beats a genius. His wallet: The smartest single model still works one step at a time. His loop moves in 300 directions at once - and never checks in with him. Claude Opus 4.8 runs the floor as the brain. 300 agents are the hands. One loop ties them together: > Decompose - Opus breaks the market into targets > Dispatch - 300 agents scatter across them at once > Execute - thousands of reads in a single pass, not one by one > Review - Opus grades every edge before a cent moves The hands find. The brain judges. The loop learns what failed and runs again, tighter each time. One daily loss cap, and it shuts itself down. It's not a bot you babysit. It's a loop that runs the whole desk. Everyone's just learning to run one loop. He runs 300 in one. The edge was never the genius model - it's the size of the loop, and the brain in charge of it. Save this - the full 300-agent loop is laid out above, start to finish. You'll want it when you build your own. 300 agents are looping right now, hunting the markets everyone skips. Two clicks and their trades land in your wallet too:

cvxv666

53,282 次观看 • 2 个月前

Jamie Dimon made $39 million last year to decide who does what at JPMorgan. One AI agent on Grok Bot does that job for $300 a month, and it hires the rest of the agents itself. Stop trying to manage any of it yourself. In 2026 a swarm of AI agents runs a team better than you do. I told my chief agent one thing. Make money or I switch you off. It took $1,000 to $3,900 in 15 hours. Every fill is on chain and the address is in my profile. I never picked a trade. I never picked a team either. The agents it hired: > a scout that hunts for what is moving and where the money is going > a forensics agent that works out who is really behind the buying > a reader that watches the mood on X, and it sees every post on this app because it is Grok > a risk agent whose only power is saying no, and its no beats every score on the desk > a treasurer that holds the money rules and the kill switch > a trader that writes the exit before it writes the entry None of those were my idea. I handed out one job title and the chief filled in the rest on its own. And the swarm is different every hour. Agents appear for one job, do it, and are gone before I know they existed. A hedge fund pays millions a year for the same org chart, and almost all of that goes on salaries. Every prompt and the whole story of my Grok Bot fund is in the post below ↓ Save it before you try to run one of these by hand.
0:50

Jamie Dimon made $39 million last year to decide who does what at JPMorgan. One AI agent on Grok Bot does that job for $300 a month, and it hires the rest of the agents itself. Stop trying to manage any of it yourself. In 2026 a swarm of AI agents runs a team better than you do. I told my chief agent one thing. Make money or I switch you off. It took $1,000 to $3,900 in 15 hours. Every fill is on chain and the address is in my profile. I never picked a trade. I never picked a team either. The agents it hired: > a scout that hunts for what is moving and where the money is going > a forensics agent that works out who is really behind the buying > a reader that watches the mood on X, and it sees every post on this app because it is Grok > a risk agent whose only power is saying no, and its no beats every score on the desk > a treasurer that holds the money rules and the kill switch > a trader that writes the exit before it writes the entry None of those were my idea. I handed out one job title and the chief filled in the rest on its own. And the swarm is different every hour. Agents appear for one job, do it, and are gone before I know they existed. A hedge fund pays millions a year for the same org chart, and almost all of that goes on salaries. Every prompt and the whole story of my Grok Bot fund is in the post below ↓ Save it before you try to run one of these by hand.

cvxv666

28,886 次观看 • 11 天前

I'M A F*CKING GENIUS - I WAS THE FIRST TO BUILD THIS WITH GROK BOT. And now? My idea is everywhere. Scroll your feed. You've seen it. The screenshots. The "digital office" carousels. The threads explaining it like they invented it. Every single one of them is running my playbook - and half of them don't even know where they got it from. I BUILT MY OWN OFFICE. AND GROK BOT IS THE BOSS. Just look at what my workplace looks like now. Before, AI sat there waiting. Waiting for me to open a chat. Waiting for a prompt. A very expensive parrot. Now I run a real digital office. Persistent agents with actual roles. A shared cloud computer, browser, and terminal. They keep working 24/7 - laptop closed, me asleep, doesn't matter. The office never shuts down. And here's the part that broke people's brains: it's easy. Download the app → sign in → create the "Chief" → give them job titles (exactly like briefing new hires) → show a task once → connect Telegram. → No experience needed. → No VPS. → No coding. → Nothing complicated. At all. I drop a goal into Telegram. The bots break it down, delegate it, and deliver it. I just make the decisions. That's the whole job now. Grok Bot isn't a chatbot. It's a team - one you can build in a single evening, even if you've never touched an agent in your life. So yeah. My content is everywhere. The recognition I actually earned? Still nowhere. Copy it again. I'll build the next one before you finish reading.
0:25

I'M A F*CKING GENIUS - I WAS THE FIRST TO BUILD THIS WITH GROK BOT. And now? My idea is everywhere. Scroll your feed. You've seen it. The screenshots. The "digital office" carousels. The threads explaining it like they invented it. Every single one of them is running my playbook - and half of them don't even know where they got it from. I BUILT MY OWN OFFICE. AND GROK BOT IS THE BOSS. Just look at what my workplace looks like now. Before, AI sat there waiting. Waiting for me to open a chat. Waiting for a prompt. A very expensive parrot. Now I run a real digital office. Persistent agents with actual roles. A shared cloud computer, browser, and terminal. They keep working 24/7 - laptop closed, me asleep, doesn't matter. The office never shuts down. And here's the part that broke people's brains: it's easy. Download the app → sign in → create the "Chief" → give them job titles (exactly like briefing new hires) → show a task once → connect Telegram. → No experience needed. → No VPS. → No coding. → Nothing complicated. At all. I drop a goal into Telegram. The bots break it down, delegate it, and deliver it. I just make the decisions. That's the whole job now. Grok Bot isn't a chatbot. It's a team - one you can build in a single evening, even if you've never touched an agent in your life. So yeah. My content is everywhere. The recognition I actually earned? Still nowhere. Copy it again. I'll build the next one before you finish reading.

Aleiah

11,604 次观看 • 19 天前

ELON MUSK REPOSTED MY GROK BOT CONTENT SETUP. AND I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY NOBODY IS DOING THIS WITH TRADING YET. A WALL STREET RESEARCH DESK COSTS MILLIONS A YEAR TO STAFF – YOU CAN NOW RUN THE SAME THING WITH 9 GROK BOT AGENTS. Nine people used to do this job. Nine Grok Bot agents now do it while you sleep. Here's the entire desk: → MACRO – watches rates, CPI, FOMC. Tells you what kind of day it is before you open a single chart. → SCANNER – sweeps 9,000 tickers for one thing: your setup. Not "interesting stocks". Yours. → CATALYST – reads every 8-K, earnings call and wire the second it drops. Flags the two that matter. → QUANT – backtests the idea before you fall in love with it. Kills it if the edge isn't there. → CRYPTO – on-chain flows, funding, basis. The stuff nobody has the energy to check at 2am. → RISK – the one that actually saves you. Sizes the position, sets the stop, refuses the 4th trade. → EXECUTION – places the order, tracks the fill, reports the slippage in basis points. → COMPLIANCE – logs every single decision. So you can audit yourself instead of lying to yourself. → CHIEF OF STAFF – sits on top of all eight. Ranks their output and hands you one page every morning. Here's the part nobody says out loud: Retail traders don't lose because they lack information. They lose because they can't process it fast enough – and can't stay disciplined when they do. Grok Bot solves the first problem completely. RISK and COMPLIANCE quietly solve the second one, because a bot never moves a stop loss. And you write zero code. You describe each agent in plain English, tell it where to look, give it one job. Start with two: SCANNER and RISK. That alone is more process than 95% of retail traders have ever run. Not financial advice – this is a research desk, not a money printer. The bots find and organise. You decide. Bookmark this & read more in the article below ↓
0:24

ELON MUSK REPOSTED MY GROK BOT CONTENT SETUP. AND I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY NOBODY IS DOING THIS WITH TRADING YET. A WALL STREET RESEARCH DESK COSTS MILLIONS A YEAR TO STAFF – YOU CAN NOW RUN THE SAME THING WITH 9 GROK BOT AGENTS. Nine people used to do this job. Nine Grok Bot agents now do it while you sleep. Here's the entire desk: → MACRO – watches rates, CPI, FOMC. Tells you what kind of day it is before you open a single chart. → SCANNER – sweeps 9,000 tickers for one thing: your setup. Not "interesting stocks". Yours. → CATALYST – reads every 8-K, earnings call and wire the second it drops. Flags the two that matter. → QUANT – backtests the idea before you fall in love with it. Kills it if the edge isn't there. → CRYPTO – on-chain flows, funding, basis. The stuff nobody has the energy to check at 2am. → RISK – the one that actually saves you. Sizes the position, sets the stop, refuses the 4th trade. → EXECUTION – places the order, tracks the fill, reports the slippage in basis points. → COMPLIANCE – logs every single decision. So you can audit yourself instead of lying to yourself. → CHIEF OF STAFF – sits on top of all eight. Ranks their output and hands you one page every morning. Here's the part nobody says out loud: Retail traders don't lose because they lack information. They lose because they can't process it fast enough – and can't stay disciplined when they do. Grok Bot solves the first problem completely. RISK and COMPLIANCE quietly solve the second one, because a bot never moves a stop loss. And you write zero code. You describe each agent in plain English, tell it where to look, give it one job. Start with two: SCANNER and RISK. That alone is more process than 95% of retail traders have ever run. Not financial advice – this is a research desk, not a money printer. The bots find and organise. You decide. Bookmark this & read more in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

93,953 次观看 • 19 天前

I GAVE MY GROK BOT $500 BY EVENING IT WAS ALREADY $8,000 yesterday I vibe-coded a bot for trading on Robinhood Chain took me literally 2 hours here’s how it works: five agents, one position at a time, one veto could kill any trade at one point 5 losses took the balance down to $286 then Grok analyzed the trades and changed the strategy next trade was $HOODAI with a $75 entry the bot spotted 3 connected wallets getting ready to sell it exited before the dump and locked a 31x after that it rotated profits into 2 more launches and rejected 294 coins $500 turned into $7,931 by the evening all from a bot I built in 2 hours
0:24

I GAVE MY GROK BOT $500 BY EVENING IT WAS ALREADY $8,000 yesterday I vibe-coded a bot for trading on Robinhood Chain took me literally 2 hours here’s how it works: five agents, one position at a time, one veto could kill any trade at one point 5 losses took the balance down to $286 then Grok analyzed the trades and changed the strategy next trade was $HOODAI with a $75 entry the bot spotted 3 connected wallets getting ready to sell it exited before the dump and locked a 31x after that it rotated profits into 2 more launches and rejected 294 coins $500 turned into $7,931 by the evening all from a bot I built in 2 hours

winkle.

20,162 次观看 • 6 天前

$700 in AI subscriptions or $700 in hardware. One charges you forever. One pays you back. One pays you back $2,500 a month. Per client. He printed the case himself. Small enough to fit in a pocket. Assembled a full PC inside it. Two commands. Six agents online. The last thing that came off that printer was a PC case. Not a figurine. Not a phone stand. A housing for a business that makes $17,000 a month. Research. Writing. Publishing. Monitoring. All local. All free. $23 a month. Content agency on top. Fifteen clients. Four hours of work a week. $6,000 to $8,000 a month. He printed the case. The case runs the business.
0:21

$700 in AI subscriptions or $700 in hardware. One charges you forever. One pays you back. One pays you back $2,500 a month. Per client. He printed the case himself. Small enough to fit in a pocket. Assembled a full PC inside it. Two commands. Six agents online. The last thing that came off that printer was a PC case. Not a figurine. Not a phone stand. A housing for a business that makes $17,000 a month. Research. Writing. Publishing. Monitoring. All local. All free. $23 a month. Content agency on top. Fifteen clients. Four hours of work a week. $6,000 to $8,000 a month. He printed the case. The case runs the business.

Superior

11,800 次观看 • 2 个月前

One bot. One prompt. It hired its own team. I created a single Grok Bot - Atlas, chief of staff - and pasted one prompt. It interviewed me, wrote its own operating manual, specced four teammates, and launched them. Watch the sidebar: Kit, Studio, Ship, Peak come online one by one. Each of them gets its own computer in the cloud. Six routines scheduled. The team runs while my laptop is closed. And nothing sends, posts, or ships without my yes. That rule is in the prompt. Full setup prompt in the first reply. Steal it.
0:59

One bot. One prompt. It hired its own team. I created a single Grok Bot - Atlas, chief of staff - and pasted one prompt. It interviewed me, wrote its own operating manual, specced four teammates, and launched them. Watch the sidebar: Kit, Studio, Ship, Peak come online one by one. Each of them gets its own computer in the cloud. Six routines scheduled. The team runs while my laptop is closed. And nothing sends, posts, or ships without my yes. That rule is in the prompt. Full setup prompt in the first reply. Steal it.

nyk

30,830 次观看 • 21 天前

HOLY SH*T, I BUILT A F**KING COMPANY INSIDE GROK BOT i split the operation into separate roles for research, writing, outreach, ops, finance and support. each agent owns one narrow job 6 agents → 1 shared operation → automatic handoffs → human approval each bot keeps its own workflow and memory, then passes finished work forward instead of routing everything back through me the control layer catches anything that sends, spends, publishes or deletes and pushes it into approval before anything happens after a few runs this stops feeling like ai chat. it feels like a 24/7 operations team running behind one dashboard
0:34

HOLY SH*T, I BUILT A F**KING COMPANY INSIDE GROK BOT i split the operation into separate roles for research, writing, outreach, ops, finance and support. each agent owns one narrow job 6 agents → 1 shared operation → automatic handoffs → human approval each bot keeps its own workflow and memory, then passes finished work forward instead of routing everything back through me the control layer catches anything that sends, spends, publishes or deletes and pushes it into approval before anything happens after a few runs this stops feeling like ai chat. it feels like a 24/7 operations team running behind one dashboard

Gipp 🦅

1,381,069 次观看 • 20 天前

A DEVELOPER FOUND SEVEN WAYS TO TAKE DOWN A PRODUCTION DATABASE THAT ALL LOOK EXACTLY LIKE NORMAL, INNOCENT CODE AND ALMOST EVERY TEAM IS SHIPPING AT LEAST ONE OF THEM RIGHT NOW 17 minutes from Josh Berkus, one of the people who actually maintains PostgreSQL, walking through the quiet mistakes that turn a healthy database into a 3am outage. -> The moment it lands, you realize none of these are exotic attacks. They're ordinary-looking decisions -- a query that locks a table, a connection that never closes, a setting no one ever questioned -- that work perfectly until the day they don't, and then they take everything down with them. The scary part isn't that the database breaks. It's how normal the code looks right up until it does. A query that runs in 5ms on your laptop and 5 minutes on prod. A migration that silently locks the whole table. A connection pool that runs dry the moment real traffic shows up. Every one of them passed review. Writing SQL that runs was never the hard part -> writing SQL that survives production is. And now that an AI agent is generating and firing queries at your real database faster than anyone can read them, every one of those seven landmines is one autocomplete away -- and the only person who can stop it is the one who already knows where they're buried. Your database doesn't go down because someone attacked it. It goes down because something that looked completely normal finally caught up with it. Save and Watch it today. You'll see the next outage coming before it lands ↓
16:51

A DEVELOPER FOUND SEVEN WAYS TO TAKE DOWN A PRODUCTION DATABASE THAT ALL LOOK EXACTLY LIKE NORMAL, INNOCENT CODE AND ALMOST EVERY TEAM IS SHIPPING AT LEAST ONE OF THEM RIGHT NOW 17 minutes from Josh Berkus, one of the people who actually maintains PostgreSQL, walking through the quiet mistakes that turn a healthy database into a 3am outage. -> The moment it lands, you realize none of these are exotic attacks. They're ordinary-looking decisions -- a query that locks a table, a connection that never closes, a setting no one ever questioned -- that work perfectly until the day they don't, and then they take everything down with them. The scary part isn't that the database breaks. It's how normal the code looks right up until it does. A query that runs in 5ms on your laptop and 5 minutes on prod. A migration that silently locks the whole table. A connection pool that runs dry the moment real traffic shows up. Every one of them passed review. Writing SQL that runs was never the hard part -> writing SQL that survives production is. And now that an AI agent is generating and firing queries at your real database faster than anyone can read them, every one of those seven landmines is one autocomplete away -- and the only person who can stop it is the one who already knows where they're buried. Your database doesn't go down because someone attacked it. It goes down because something that looked completely normal finally caught up with it. Save and Watch it today. You'll see the next outage coming before it lands ↓

slash1s

22,268 次观看 • 3 个月前

I was about to pay $7K a month for an SEO agency. Instead, I built one on naïve in 10 minutes. And now it runs itself. Here's exactly what it's doing right now, without me touching anything: → Publishing and ranking content on autopilot → Doing outbound outreach to potential clients → Tracking revenue and generating reports → Resolving client tickets and tracking satisfaction All of this from one prompt. 🔗 "Launch a productized SEO agency that runs itself." That's all I typed. Naive spun up a full team of AI employees instantly. Each one with their own: → Email inbox → Bank account → Phone number → Workspace They don't work in silos. They share context, delegate tasks, and coordinate as a full team. Every outcome feeds a self-improvement loop, they extract patterns, compound knowledge, and get smarter over time. Here's my setup: ✅ Set a budget ✅ Defined the goal ✅ Walked away The agency runs 24/7. No human in the loop. No payroll. No management. No retainer. Just a productized business operating on its own. The results speak for themselves: 📈 Founders already generating real ARR 📈 Active businesses growing 32% week over week 📈 Tasks completed growing 42% week over week You don't need to hire an SEO agency. You can own one. Try it yourself. One prompt is all it takes. → #NaïveAI2B9YHR
0:35

I was about to pay $7K a month for an SEO agency. Instead, I built one on naïve in 10 minutes. And now it runs itself. Here's exactly what it's doing right now, without me touching anything: → Publishing and ranking content on autopilot → Doing outbound outreach to potential clients → Tracking revenue and generating reports → Resolving client tickets and tracking satisfaction All of this from one prompt. 🔗 "Launch a productized SEO agency that runs itself." That's all I typed. Naive spun up a full team of AI employees instantly. Each one with their own: → Email inbox → Bank account → Phone number → Workspace They don't work in silos. They share context, delegate tasks, and coordinate as a full team. Every outcome feeds a self-improvement loop, they extract patterns, compound knowledge, and get smarter over time. Here's my setup: ✅ Set a budget ✅ Defined the goal ✅ Walked away The agency runs 24/7. No human in the loop. No payroll. No management. No retainer. Just a productized business operating on its own. The results speak for themselves: 📈 Founders already generating real ARR 📈 Active businesses growing 32% week over week 📈 Tasks completed growing 42% week over week You don't need to hire an SEO agency. You can own one. Try it yourself. One prompt is all it takes. → #NaïveAI2B9YHR

Gina Acosta

52,122 次观看 • 4 个月前