正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

WTH!!! 🚨 claude users!!!! I used Sonnet 5.5 at MAX and it is FIRE!!! 🔥 (this is a $20 account!!) Here is the usage: - 3 hrs 14 mins of work - 68 million tokens!!! - 15% weekly limit used (123% 5h limit) - $60.94 API usage!! it reviewed... show more

shownotover

4,002 subscribers

30,152 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术喜剧科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

37 条评论

noah helms 的头像

noah helms1 天前

This is insane! As a freelance video editor, I'm scared lol

shownotover 的头像

shownotover1 天前

Might as well ship all the videos to your clients using claude haha

noah helms 的头像

noah helms1 天前

Maybe soon I’ll be able to! I find it struggles with long-form videos

shownotover 的头像

shownotover19 小时前

Sonnet 5.5 is really good

VulKan 的头像

VulKan1 天前

thanks man for testing and calculating it, I was wondering about it and I don't have multiple subs to test it out xD

shownotover 的头像

shownotover1 天前

No probs bro... If you are confused which sub to get, simply get Claude $20 for now... best as of today

Adcode 的头像

Adcode1 天前

Amazing, better than codex in every way

shownotover 的头像

shownotover1 天前

Sonnet 5.5 even beats Fable 5.1 in video design haha

Adcode 的头像

Adcode1 天前

Try giving it a reference video, it will cook

shownotover 的头像

shownotover1 天前

haha... don't have one but I love this one too

Sahil Panhotra | Indie Builder 的头像

Sahil Panhotra | Indie Builder23 小时前

wow that's amazing

shownotover 的头像

shownotover20 小时前

Yeah bro 🔥

SE Hozaifa 的头像

SE Hozaifa1 天前

A $20 plan doing that much work and still looking this clean is crazy.

shownotover 的头像

shownotover1 天前

Yeah... It's fire 🔥

shownotover 的头像

shownotover20 小时前

Damn 😭

Kekius Pisimus 的头像

Kekius Pisimus1 天前

Better than GPT 6 Astra.

shownotover 的头像

shownotover1 天前

Yeah... So much better than Astra

Kekius Pisimus 的头像

Kekius Pisimus1 天前

What's the prompt?

Kekius Pisimus 的头像

Kekius Pisimus1 天前

Thanks

Yipeng | Daily AI 的头像

Yipeng | Daily AI1 天前

The review loop sounds great 🔥

shownotover 的头像

shownotover1 天前

I know right!!! It was crazy long for about 2 hrs

Steven Cheng 的头像

Steven Cheng19 小时前

68M tokens is insane

shownotover 的头像

shownotover19 小时前

ik right!!

Qais 的头像

Qais1 天前

🔥 looks crazy

shownotover 的头像

shownotover1 天前

Feels crazy too I wish Openai could do the same... Even Gemini 4 can't do that

Darren 的头像

Darren1 天前

Isn't that max is way more token consume than high ?

shownotover 的头像

shownotover20 小时前

Yeah... That's why a lot of tokens were consumed

Timurs Jeparskis 的头像

Timurs Jeparskis20 小时前

When it comes to video generation, Claude is an absolute god! My GPT-6.1 Sol Max turns out way worse results

shownotover 的头像

shownotover19 小时前

GPT-6.1 sol is just worse ... idk why we even using it

Kerdo 的头像

Kerdo1 天前

It feels unlimited hahaha

shownotover 的头像

shownotover1 天前

well, not on $20 sub haha

Kerdo 的头像

Kerdo1 天前

Ah yes lol...

taha aalam 的头像

taha aalam20 小时前

Prompt used

Brian Hadu 的头像

Brian Hadu23 小时前

hitting 68 million tokens is insane and shows how powerful Sonnet 5.5 can be

Frit🅾️ Pendej🅾️ 的头像

Frit🅾️ Pendej🅾️22 小时前

Meanwhile Open A.I. raised their $200 plan to $500. This is the exact pivotal moment in history that we will be able to pinpoint the decision that killed Open A.I.

Gio Gelashvili 的头像

Gio Gelashvili20 小时前

Can't fix one python asyncio bug btw 🥀

OpenBuilder 的头像

OpenBuilder20 小时前

What prompt or plugin did you use for the video??

相关视频

🚨 codex, claude and grok users!! I have FINALLY tested this for YOU!!! the $20 subscriptions! Codex VS Claude VS Grok (Watch video for results) Claude Pro: - Opus 5.5 (max) - 10% Weekly limit = 115 Million tokens - 2 hr work - 5/10 Quality Codex Plus: - GPT-6 Sol (max) - 9% Weekly limit = 29 Million tokens - 69 min work - 7/10 Quality SuperGrok: - Grok 4.7 (xhigh) - 23% Weekly limit = 19 Million tokens - 36 min work - 6/10 Quality All the models were used at MAX!! (grok 4.7 at xhigh) The surprising thing is that with my calculations is that I am getting $4,000 worth of API usage with Claude pro 🤯 AND ALSO!!! DO NOT BUY SUPERGROK!!! 23% of weekly limit for only 19 Million tokens ONLY!! Codex is nerfed too... you are still getting only $330 of API usage monthly My opinion: For $20, GO WITH CLAUDE!! You can always use those 4x extra tokens to improve again and again NOTE: Please forgive the video quality, this is my first video ever... and I don't know editing. Just sharing info about all these AI subs. Hope it helps 🙂

🚨 codex, claude and grok users!! I have FINALLY tested this for YOU!!! the $20 subscriptions! Codex VS Claude VS Grok (Watch video for results) Claude Pro: - Opus 5.5 (max) - 10% Weekly limit = 115 Million tokens - 2 hr work - 5/10 Quality Codex Plus: - GPT-6 Sol (max) - 9% Weekly limit = 29 Million tokens - 69 min work - 7/10 Quality SuperGrok: - Grok 4.7 (xhigh) - 23% Weekly limit = 19 Million tokens - 36 min work - 6/10 Quality All the models were used at MAX!! (grok 4.7 at xhigh) The surprising thing is that with my calculations is that I am getting $4,000 worth of API usage with Claude pro 🤯 AND ALSO!!! DO NOT BUY SUPERGROK!!! 23% of weekly limit for only 19 Million tokens ONLY!! Codex is nerfed too... you are still getting only $330 of API usage monthly My opinion: For $20, GO WITH CLAUDE!! You can always use those 4x extra tokens to improve again and again NOTE: Please forgive the video quality, this is my first video ever... and I don't know editing. Just sharing info about all these AI subs. Hope it helps 🙂

shownotover

83,333 次观看 • 8 天前

🚨 I got ChatGPT plus ($20) I am disappointed... so MUCH!! I used GPT-6 Astra on MAX!! Here are the results: - 47 mins of total work - 8.8 Million tokens ONLY!!!! - $18 API usage - 20% weekly limit consumed EXTREMELY SLOW!!! and you're only getting around $360 usage / month! Claude was $1100!!! the 5h limit hit around 15% weekly... so you won't be even getting this!! I don't have a 5h limit for some reason (plus plan!) I think I WASTED my money... Limits are nerfed af!! Never ever I am buying codex again. I recommend buying Claude (BEST VALUE!)

🚨 I got ChatGPT plus ($20) I am disappointed... so MUCH!! I used GPT-6 Astra on MAX!! Here are the results: - 47 mins of total work - 8.8 Million tokens ONLY!!!! - $18 API usage - 20% weekly limit consumed EXTREMELY SLOW!!! and you're only getting around $360 usage / month! Claude was $1100!!! the 5h limit hit around 15% weekly... so you won't be even getting this!! I don't have a 5h limit for some reason (plus plan!) I think I WASTED my money... Limits are nerfed af!! Never ever I am buying codex again. I recommend buying Claude (BEST VALUE!)

shownotover

116,349 次观看 • 9 天前

🚨 I tested Claude Pro ($20) I used Opus 5 at MED settings (forgot to use max) I am ABSOLUTELY AMAZED!!! 20 mins is what I was thinking... here is what I actually got: - 44 minutes of usage - 58% of 5h limit used (7% weekly!) - $25 API usage - 32 Million tokens!!! Meaning!!!! You'll get ~$1500 worth of API usage for $20!!! And a TOTAL of 41 HOURS of WORK!!! (in a month) ABSOLUTE GOAT!! I was NOT expecting this! Codex!! Good bye, I don't think I'll ever come back!

🚨 I tested Claude Pro ($20) I used Opus 5 at MED settings (forgot to use max) I am ABSOLUTELY AMAZED!!! 20 mins is what I was thinking... here is what I actually got: - 44 minutes of usage - 58% of 5h limit used (7% weekly!) - $25 API usage - 32 Million tokens!!! Meaning!!!! You'll get ~$1500 worth of API usage for $20!!! And a TOTAL of 41 HOURS of WORK!!! (in a month) ABSOLUTE GOAT!! I was NOT expecting this! Codex!! Good bye, I don't think I'll ever come back!

shownotover

158,858 次观看 • 12 天前

🚨codex users!!!! I tested GPT-6 Sol on $20 plan I set the effort to "MAX" I am NOT happy with the results - 15 Million tokens - 7% weekly limit used - $4.21 API cost - 35 minutes of work So... you are getting 857 Million tokens of GPT-6 Sol And wierd part is... only $250 API usage / month?? Claude was $1100 / month with Opus 5 at Max at $20 sub AND Again!! IT IS EXTREMELY SLOW!!! it did NOT complete the task!! I specifically mentioned it to test in THIS SPECIFIC way it only tested "builds" and called it a day Tbh, this is my 4th test with Codex... and I'd prefer Claude (with Opus 5) NOTE: This was a test, I don't use gpt-6 or Opus 5.5 on max for my own workflows... this just shows how much you are getting in "tokens" for the "price" you are paying.

🚨codex users!!!! I tested GPT-6 Sol on $20 plan I set the effort to "MAX" I am NOT happy with the results - 15 Million tokens - 7% weekly limit used - $4.21 API cost - 35 minutes of work So... you are getting 857 Million tokens of GPT-6 Sol And wierd part is... only $250 API usage / month?? Claude was $1100 / month with Opus 5 at Max at $20 sub AND Again!! IT IS EXTREMELY SLOW!!! it did NOT complete the task!! I specifically mentioned it to test in THIS SPECIFIC way it only tested "builds" and called it a day Tbh, this is my 4th test with Codex... and I'd prefer Claude (with Opus 5) NOTE: This was a test, I don't use gpt-6 or Opus 5.5 on max for my own workflows... this just shows how much you are getting in "tokens" for the "price" you are paying.

shownotover

82,881 次观看 • 8 天前

🚨 I tested Claude Pro ($20) AGAIN!!! I used Opus 5 at MAX settings This is CRAZY!!!! 30 minutes? that must be it, right? NO!!! here is what I actually got: - 1 Hr and 24 minutes of usage!!! - 13% Weekly limit consumed - $37 API usage - 40 Million tokens!!! Meaning!!!! You'll get ~$1130 worth of API usage for $20!!! (on max) And a TOTAL of 43 HOURS of WORK!!! (in a month) Its MUCH BETTER than Codex!! I'd recommend using Med (cause it gives more tokens) Codex!! Good bye, I don't think I'll ever come back!

🚨 I tested Claude Pro ($20) AGAIN!!! I used Opus 5 at MAX settings This is CRAZY!!!! 30 minutes? that must be it, right? NO!!! here is what I actually got: - 1 Hr and 24 minutes of usage!!! - 13% Weekly limit consumed - $37 API usage - 40 Million tokens!!! Meaning!!!! You'll get ~$1130 worth of API usage for $20!!! (on max) And a TOTAL of 43 HOURS of WORK!!! (in a month) Its MUCH BETTER than Codex!! I'd recommend using Med (cause it gives more tokens) Codex!! Good bye, I don't think I'll ever come back!

shownotover

83,805 次观看 • 11 天前

I bought ChatGPT plus ($20) I used GPT-6 Astra on "MAX" I gave it the task: "Integrate Supabase and Improve App UI" It worked for 40+ minutes! YES! The task wasn't done... These are the usage stats: - 100% 5 hr limit consumed - 16% weekly limit consumed - 5 Million tokens used - 50k Output Tokens For $20, where I can barely use Opus 5 for 20 minutes... I am getting GPT-6 Astra for 40 minutes is MORE than enough. BEST value you can get! Absolutly AMAZING!

I bought ChatGPT plus ($20) I used GPT-6 Astra on "MAX" I gave it the task: "Integrate Supabase and Improve App UI" It worked for 40+ minutes! YES! The task wasn't done... These are the usage stats: - 100% 5 hr limit consumed - 16% weekly limit consumed - 5 Million tokens used - 50k Output Tokens For $20, where I can barely use Opus 5 for 20 minutes... I am getting GPT-6 Astra for 40 minutes is MORE than enough. BEST value you can get! Absolutly AMAZING!

shownotover

198,946 次观看 • 25 天前

I tested Claude Code on a fresh account - 1,500 lines of HTML cost me 50% of my window. Full video and summary is here.. I just ran a recorded test on Claude Code with a fresh account (Pro, not Max - my main account was 20x Max) , and the result is honestly insane. The task was trivial: create 3 simple demo HTML pages, around 500 lines each. Roughly 1,500 lines of code total. Nothing massive. Nothing enterprise-grade. Nothing that should meaningfully stress a premium coding product. And yet Claude Code burned through 40% of my 5-hour window almost immediately. I ran the exact same test with Codex, and it consumed only 2%. Then it got even worse: after the session ended, I did absolutely nothing for 15 minutes, and Claude still ate another 10%. Total: 50% of the 5-hour window gone for a tiny HTML demo. My weekly usage had already started at 2% before I even really used it, and after this tiny test it jumped to 8%. Now let us be generous and assume this entire run used around 30k tokens total. If 30k tokens represents 10% of weekly usage, that implies around 300k tokens per week. That is roughly 1.2M-1.3M tokens per month, and even if you round up aggressively, you are still in the 1.5M token range. Using the Sonnet 4.6 pricing you list: $3 per 1M input tokens $15 per 1M output tokens How exactly is this supposed to make sense for a paid coding product? Because from the user side, this no longer looks like "premium usage protection." It looks like a quota system that is either wildly inefficient, badly broken, or being accounted in a way users are not being told about. And that is before I even get to my main account: my $200 Max plan now dies in a single day. Just a few months ago, similar or heavier usage would last me about a week. So no, I do not buy the "maybe you just used it more" excuse anymore. Something is clearly broken in Claude Code. Either token accounting is broken, context handling is broken, background consumption is broken, or all three. Alex Albert is this really the experience you want users to pay for? Just watch the video. I tried to be very transparent and clear for your team! I was fan of Claude but just disappointed! And if you want, send me the detailed token accounting for this session and let us inspect it together publicly. Because from where I am standing, this is no longer a small pricing annoyance. It looks like something seriously wrong is happening, and users deserve a real explanation.

I tested Claude Code on a fresh account - 1,500 lines of HTML cost me 50% of my window. Full video and summary is here.. I just ran a recorded test on Claude Code with a fresh account (Pro, not Max - my main account was 20x Max) , and the result is honestly insane. The task was trivial: create 3 simple demo HTML pages, around 500 lines each. Roughly 1,500 lines of code total. Nothing massive. Nothing enterprise-grade. Nothing that should meaningfully stress a premium coding product. And yet Claude Code burned through 40% of my 5-hour window almost immediately. I ran the exact same test with Codex, and it consumed only 2%. Then it got even worse: after the session ended, I did absolutely nothing for 15 minutes, and Claude still ate another 10%. Total: 50% of the 5-hour window gone for a tiny HTML demo. My weekly usage had already started at 2% before I even really used it, and after this tiny test it jumped to 8%. Now let us be generous and assume this entire run used around 30k tokens total. If 30k tokens represents 10% of weekly usage, that implies around 300k tokens per week. That is roughly 1.2M-1.3M tokens per month, and even if you round up aggressively, you are still in the 1.5M token range. Using the Sonnet 4.6 pricing you list: $3 per 1M input tokens $15 per 1M output tokens How exactly is this supposed to make sense for a paid coding product? Because from the user side, this no longer looks like "premium usage protection." It looks like a quota system that is either wildly inefficient, badly broken, or being accounted in a way users are not being told about. And that is before I even get to my main account: my $200 Max plan now dies in a single day. Just a few months ago, similar or heavier usage would last me about a week. So no, I do not buy the "maybe you just used it more" excuse anymore. Something is clearly broken in Claude Code. Either token accounting is broken, context handling is broken, background consumption is broken, or all three. Alex Albert is this really the experience you want users to pay for? Just watch the video. I tried to be very transparent and clear for your team! I was fan of Claude but just disappointed! And if you want, send me the detailed token accounting for this session and let us inspect it together publicly. Because from where I am standing, this is no longer a small pricing annoyance. It looks like something seriously wrong is happening, and users deserve a real explanation.

Hayrettin Tüzel

26,854 次观看 • 6 个月前

when I was a kid this was science fiction. i've watched AI type for years, but hearing it and seeing what it made is a whole different level. i asked Claude opus 5.5 to introduce itself, however it wanted without any token usage restrictions and access to any api it wanted. it decided to write a song, make a video, visualize itself and give an interview behind the music. it also wrote this thread 🧵

when I was a kid this was science fiction. i've watched AI type for years, but hearing it and seeing what it made is a whole different level. i asked Claude opus 5.5 to introduce itself, however it wanted without any token usage restrictions and access to any api it wanted. it decided to write a song, make a video, visualize itself and give an interview behind the music. it also wrote this thread 🧵

John Knopf

755,775 次观看 • 5 天前

You're burning $200/mo on Claude and blaming model The problem with spending a lot of tokens is not Claude, but you One developer added 5 lines to his CLAUDE. md and cut his monthly token spend by 60% Most people don't realize: every API call resends your ENTIRE conversation history: turn 1 message = 500 tokens 20 messages = 200,000 tokens And you're paying for all of it, every single time! All you need to stop spending a lot of tokens is to know the habits and life hacks for saving tokens It is not necessary to add everything, even 2-3 habits will save tokens several times

You're burning $200/mo on Claude and blaming model The problem with spending a lot of tokens is not Claude, but you One developer added 5 lines to his CLAUDE. md and cut his monthly token spend by 60% Most people don't realize: every API call resends your ENTIRE conversation history: turn 1 message = 500 tokens 20 messages = 200,000 tokens And you're paying for all of it, every single time! All you need to stop spending a lot of tokens is to know the habits and life hacks for saving tokens It is not necessary to add everything, even 2-3 habits will save tokens several times

kaize

54,693 次观看 • 4 个月前

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

Avid

57,544 次观看 • 2 个月前

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

107,777 次观看 • 3 个月前

sonnet 5 is routing to sonnet 5.2 looks like all 3 claude models are now routing for some users and from testing: > opus 5.2 is the biggest jump > sonnet 5.2 looks way better too > fable 5.2 is only a small jump at this point anthropic got whole new claude 5.2 family getting ready to release when do you think they will release them?

sonnet 5 is routing to sonnet 5.2 looks like all 3 claude models are now routing for some users and from testing: > opus 5.2 is the biggest jump > sonnet 5.2 looks way better too > fable 5.2 is only a small jump at this point anthropic got whole new claude 5.2 family getting ready to release when do you think they will release them?

J A Z I I

42,145 次观看 • 11 天前

I had way too much fun using Claude to create a reply video. - Extremely fun to be able to convert scattered thoughts and ideas into a song + video - Creating this took <1 hour of my time (in occasionally steering the model in between other things) - But it took ~10 hours of wall clock time for the agent to generate the video + iteratively refine it based on feedback - In terms of AI usage: it required only a small number of Suno credits and 10% weekly usage of a Claude Max subscription (I was using Opus 5.5)

I had way too much fun using Claude to create a reply video. - Extremely fun to be able to convert scattered thoughts and ideas into a song + video - Creating this took <1 hour of my time (in occasionally steering the model in between other things) - But it took ~10 hours of wall clock time for the agent to generate the video + iteratively refine it based on feedback - In terms of AI usage: it required only a small number of Suno credits and 10% weekly usage of a Claude Max subscription (I was using Opus 5.5)

Sayash Kapoor

53,472 次观看 • 10 小时前

this is f**king dangerous someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in opus 4.8 with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Create a New Claude Project and "Add this .md in Project instructions 3) Use Opus 4.8 High/Max and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/5th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

this is f**king dangerous someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in opus 4.8 with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Create a New Claude Project and "Add this .md in Project instructions 3) Use Opus 4.8 High/Max and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/5th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

Avid

954,179 次观看 • 2 个月前

As some of you guessed, it is indeed the OnePlus 13. Surprised, right? Worst part is this usage did not even have any gaming. Only normal usage with YouTube, Netflix, YT music, Twitter scrolling, texting and max. of 45 mins hotspot. Proof attached👇

As some of you guessed, it is indeed the OnePlus 13. Surprised, right? Worst part is this usage did not even have any gaming. Only normal usage with YouTube, Netflix, YT music, Twitter scrolling, texting and max. of 45 mins hotspot. Proof attached👇

Aryan Gupta

13,290 次观看 • 1 年前

Opus 5.5, Grok 4.7, GPT-6 Sol, GPT-6 Astra and Sonnet 5.5 all dropped within a week. So much for "pacing the frontier", huh? ...what if I told you this is exactly what pacing looks like? I made a video about it :)

Opus 5.5, Grok 4.7, GPT-6 Sol, GPT-6 Astra and Sonnet 5.5 all dropped within a week. So much for "pacing the frontier", huh? ...what if I told you this is exactly what pacing looks like? I made a video about it :)

Theo - t3.gg

67,173 次观看 • 3 天前

I asked Sonnet 5.5 to create a overcooked clone i could play in the broswer. the results shocked me... It is delivering triple aaa level polish at 20x cheaper than opus 5.5 if you put it in x-high it will RUN. this model will be a perfect worker agent for opus 5.5 or the upcoming fable 5.5 to orchestrate. Anthropic is MOGGGING rn.

I asked Sonnet 5.5 to create a overcooked clone i could play in the broswer. the results shocked me... It is delivering triple aaa level polish at 20x cheaper than opus 5.5 if you put it in x-high it will RUN. this model will be a perfect worker agent for opus 5.5 or the upcoming fable 5.5 to orchestrate. Anthropic is MOGGGING rn.

Max Blade

81,276 次观看 • 3 天前

🚨API IS CHEAPER THAN SUBSCRIPTION. I ONE-SHOT A PLAYABLE MARIO CLONE WITH ONLY $2 OF API CREDITS. Yesterday I posted that Claude MAX 20x gave me less than 4 hours of actual Fable 5.1 usage before I was already at ~77% of my weekly limit. I was genuinely asking how “45% cheaper” mattered if I could barely use the model. MixRoute AI saw the post and reached out to let me stress-test their API for a full day. So I thought why dont we make a comparision between both of them Claude Code session: $10.25 cache hit 97% MixRoute AI API usage: $2.00 Claude Code: ~25 min → $10.25 MixRoute: ~32 min → $2.00 ~6 minutes slower. ~80% cheaper. Both built a playable Mario clone. Full run sped up ~60x ↓

🚨API IS CHEAPER THAN SUBSCRIPTION. I ONE-SHOT A PLAYABLE MARIO CLONE WITH ONLY $2 OF API CREDITS. Yesterday I posted that Claude MAX 20x gave me less than 4 hours of actual Fable 5.1 usage before I was already at ~77% of my weekly limit. I was genuinely asking how “45% cheaper” mattered if I could barely use the model. MixRoute AI saw the post and reached out to let me stress-test their API for a full day. So I thought why dont we make a comparision between both of them Claude Code session: $10.25 cache hit 97% MixRoute AI API usage: $2.00 Claude Code: ~25 min → $10.25 MixRoute: ~32 min → $2.00 ~6 minutes slower. ~80% cheaper. Both built a playable Mario clone. Full run sped up ~60x ↓

Abdelrahman Alkerdawy

21,929 次观看 • 28 天前

This is what I do now. I get claude to write raps. Lyric video for Slopcore. the wordplay and references are super fun, 5.5 just gets it. (shoutout Kujar3 for help on the audio)

This is what I do now. I get claude to write raps. Lyric video for Slopcore. the wordplay and references are super fun, 5.5 just gets it. (shoutout Kujar3 for help on the audio)

billy

20,612 次观看 • 6 天前

This is crazy man... one prompt + 4 minutes and I hit my 5 hour rate limit in the Gemini app. Here is the proof. Yesterday, I hit the rate limit the same way, so I wanted to check if it would happen again. I started with 0% usage on my 5 hour limit, then gave one simple prompt for video generation using the avatar feature. It ran for around 3 to 4 minutes, hit 100% of the rate limit, and the video generation failed as well.

AshutoshShrivastava

82,527 次观看 • 4 个月前