正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

WuWa Fam here's the difference between DLSS 4.0 and 4.5 I've been using DLSS 4.5 for a while now and the experience is night and day! - Sharper Textures - No more blurriness - Character Models look better too If you got a 40 or 50 series GPU try... show more

WuWa Info

11,980 subscribers

32,826 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

#WutheringWaves

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

WuWa Fam have you tried playing with DLSS 4.5? It has been a game changer for me, the textures look 2x better. - No more blurring - Ground details are twice as sharp if you have a Rtx 4070 or 50series card it's 100% worth a shot! #WutheringWaves

WuWa Fam have you tried playing with DLSS 4.5? It has been a game changer for me, the textures look 2x better. - No more blurring - Ground details are twice as sharp if you have a Rtx 4070 or 50series card it's 100% worth a shot! #WutheringWaves

WuWa Info

73,073 次观看 • 2 个月前

Holy Crap! nVidia DLSS 4.5 and even Framegen might be GOOD now. LinusTechTips: "I hate that Fake Frames are good now": - DLSS 4.5 is MUCH SHARPER on upscaling than even the source material. Particles stand out, image quality better than source. - Fake Frames up to 6x, but not how you think. Think no more frame-drops as framegen is dynamic now. Only when you need them. Linus can't even tell when its on or off in most cases now. Watch video highlight below for details.

Holy Crap! nVidia DLSS 4.5 and even Framegen might be GOOD now. LinusTechTips: "I hate that Fake Frames are good now": - DLSS 4.5 is MUCH SHARPER on upscaling than even the source material. Particles stand out, image quality better than source. - Fake Frames up to 6x, but not how you think. Think no more frame-drops as framegen is dynamic now. Only when you need them. Linus can't even tell when its on or off in most cases now. Watch video highlight below for details.

Grummz

590,854 次观看 • 7 个月前

There are two things worth pointing out about upscaling in #AssassinCreed Black Flag Resynced. 1. Incorrect resolution scaling with Balanced and Performance modes: Using Balanced or Performance with any upscaler causes the game's Resolution Scale (output resolution) to drop, which also lowers the internal render resolution. As a result, these modes apply incorrect scaling and the image quality is noticeably worse than it should be. For now, the workaround is to set the Resolution Scale to 100% and manually adjust the Max Dynamic Resolution (internal resolution) to match the expected scaling for Balanced or Performance mode. 2. The game defaults to the older DLSS 3 CNN model: By default, the game uses the older DLSS 3 Preset E. While it's still a fine option, it doesn't match the image quality of the DLSS 4 Transformer model (Preset K) or the newer DLSS 4.5 (Preset L and M). So I highly recommend forcing at least Preset K through the NVIDIA App (or another tool). Even on RTX 20/30 series GPUs, with Preset K, you can maintain the same performance as before while getting better image quality by using a lower upscaling mode, like Balanced instead of Quality. Hopefully Ubisoft Support fixes the scaling issue and adds an in-game option to choose between DLSS 3, DLSS 4, and DLSS 4.5.

There are two things worth pointing out about upscaling in #AssassinCreed Black Flag Resynced. 1. Incorrect resolution scaling with Balanced and Performance modes: Using Balanced or Performance with any upscaler causes the game's Resolution Scale (output resolution) to drop, which also lowers the internal render resolution. As a result, these modes apply incorrect scaling and the image quality is noticeably worse than it should be. For now, the workaround is to set the Resolution Scale to 100% and manually adjust the Max Dynamic Resolution (internal resolution) to match the expected scaling for Balanced or Performance mode. 2. The game defaults to the older DLSS 3 CNN model: By default, the game uses the older DLSS 3 Preset E. While it's still a fine option, it doesn't match the image quality of the DLSS 4 Transformer model (Preset K) or the newer DLSS 4.5 (Preset L and M). So I highly recommend forcing at least Preset K through the NVIDIA App (or another tool). Even on RTX 20/30 series GPUs, with Preset K, you can maintain the same performance as before while getting better image quality by using a lower upscaling mode, like Balanced instead of Quality. Hopefully Ubisoft Support fixes the scaling issue and adds an in-game option to choose between DLSS 3, DLSS 4, and DLSS 4.5.

BenchmarKing

38,817 次观看 • 1 个月前

Here's a direct comparison between native TAA VS DLSS 4.5 VS FSR 4 Redstone in Cyberpunk 2077. For this comparison I've used the same in-game save file, game settings and the latest drivers on both machines. The first clip shows Cyberpunk 2077 running at 1080p using native TAA. The second clip shows the game rendered at 1080p then using DLSS 4.5 preset M to upscale it to 4k Third clip shows the game rendered at 1080p then using FSR 4 Redstone to upscale it to 4k

Here's a direct comparison between native TAA VS DLSS 4.5 VS FSR 4 Redstone in Cyberpunk 2077. For this comparison I've used the same in-game save file, game settings and the latest drivers on both machines. The first clip shows Cyberpunk 2077 running at 1080p using native TAA. The second clip shows the game rendered at 1080p then using DLSS 4.5 preset M to upscale it to 4k Third clip shows the game rendered at 1080p then using FSR 4 Redstone to upscale it to 4k

NikTek

111,325 次观看 • 7 个月前

🟢Nvidia’s new DLSS 4.5 Ray Reconstruction makes a noticeable difference in Resident Evil Requiem. DLSS Ray Reconstruction 4.5 was found in the files of the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 beta. The version included there can already be enabled in other supported games using NVIDIA Profile Inspector. In Requiem, it gives a sharper and more detailed image, especially in reflections, with no performance loss reported in testing. 📅Nvidia hasn’t officially released the new Ray Reconstruction model yet. The company will show and talk more about its newest gaming technologies today, August 25, during its special Gamescom 2026 presentation at 8 AM PT. 📽️via yt/MxBenchmarkPC

RENEWS

12,096 次观看 • 7 天前

It all started with fake frames, now its evolving onto fake graphics? Imagine if FSR, XeSS and PSSR started embracing this kind of upscaling. In the same game, you will have different looking outputs for every different upscaler because these AI models wont be trained on the same data. Grace in this case here, will look different on an Nvidia GPU using DLSS 5, she will look different using FSR, PSSR or XeSS. You get the point I don't why but I always felt that DLSS was always supposed to provide only one thing, give gamers a better framerate while retaining the same image quality as native resolution. I don't want a randomized output for a character's face that I won't recognize if I turn on DLSS 5 even if my framerate triples. Nvidia and all the game studios embracing this AI slop should take a step back in my opinion because this is not it, even if it is years away.

It all started with fake frames, now its evolving onto fake graphics? Imagine if FSR, XeSS and PSSR started embracing this kind of upscaling. In the same game, you will have different looking outputs for every different upscaler because these AI models wont be trained on the same data. Grace in this case here, will look different on an Nvidia GPU using DLSS 5, she will look different using FSR, PSSR or XeSS. You get the point I don't why but I always felt that DLSS was always supposed to provide only one thing, give gamers a better framerate while retaining the same image quality as native resolution. I don't want a randomized output for a character's face that I won't recognize if I turn on DLSS 5 even if my framerate triples. Nvidia and all the game studios embracing this AI slop should take a step back in my opinion because this is not it, even if it is years away.

NikTek

42,066 次观看 • 5 个月前

I tested this on the 4070 Super, and while there is a performance difference, it’s not huge. The GPU also pulls more power on the older driver. If you’re using Path Tracing and have a higher-power 40 series GPU, it’s still worth trying, you might see a bigger performance boost.

I tested this on the 4070 Super, and while there is a performance difference, it’s not huge. The GPU also pulls more power on the older driver. If you’re using Path Tracing and have a higher-power 40 series GPU, it’s still worth trying, you might see a bigger performance boost.

BenchmarKing

54,108 次观看 • 6 个月前

Ultimate Upgrade. Powers Unleashed. Get CONTROL Resonant with the purchase of qualifying CORSAIR Gaming PCs powered by GeForce RTX™ 50 Series through September 29. Experience a warped Manhattan brought to life with GeForce RTX™ 50 Series and NVIDIA DLSS 4.5. Take CONTROL with CORSAIR and RTX. #RTXOn Buy CORSAIR:

Ultimate Upgrade. Powers Unleashed. Get CONTROL Resonant with the purchase of qualifying CORSAIR Gaming PCs powered by GeForce RTX™ 50 Series through September 29. Experience a warped Manhattan brought to life with GeForce RTX™ 50 Series and NVIDIA DLSS 4.5. Take CONTROL with CORSAIR and RTX. #RTXOn Buy CORSAIR:

CORSAIR

34,337 次观看 • 6 天前

Its here ! Grok 4.5 is now the model being used for Expert and Heavy modes on Grok Web and Apps. Using Grok Heavy now shows 4 agents using Grok v9 aka Grok 4.5 where it previously used 16 agents with the older models. Now we can use SpaceXAI's latest 1.5T parameter model anywhere!

Its here ! Grok 4.5 is now the model being used for Expert and Heavy modes on Grok Web and Apps. Using Grok Heavy now shows 4 agents using Grok v9 aka Grok 4.5 where it previously used 16 agents with the older models. Now we can use SpaceXAI's latest 1.5T parameter model anywhere!

️

68,823 次观看 • 1 个月前

If you can get to the path of totality for the #solareclipse2024 you should. It is literally a night and day difference from 99% to 100% coverage. It is a life-changing experience. Here's a look at the path of 100% totality through the middle of the U.S.

If you can get to the path of totality for the #solareclipse2024 you should. It is literally a night and day difference from 99% to 100% coverage. It is a life-changing experience. Here's a look at the path of 100% totality through the middle of the U.S.

Brad Panovich

1,526,479 次观看 • 2 年前

FSR 4 Redstone VS DLSS 4.5 tested in Black Myth: Wukong at super-low resolutions In this comparison I've set the following settings: 720p output resolution and render scale at 50% (360p) for all the upscalers. I've also included other upscalers that the game offers like NXSR, TSR and FSR 3 so you can see how each one does its job at reconstructing the image. DLSS 4.5 definitely takes the cake here by showing the most pleasing image of them all, followed closely by FSR 4 Redstone. TSR also looks surprisingly good, however the edges around the character are much rougher.

FSR 4 Redstone VS DLSS 4.5 tested in Black Myth: Wukong at super-low resolutions In this comparison I've set the following settings: 720p output resolution and render scale at 50% (360p) for all the upscalers. I've also included other upscalers that the game offers like NXSR, TSR and FSR 3 so you can see how each one does its job at reconstructing the image. DLSS 4.5 definitely takes the cake here by showing the most pleasing image of them all, followed closely by FSR 4 Redstone. TSR also looks surprisingly good, however the edges around the character are much rougher.

NikTek

44,354 次观看 • 7 个月前

During DLSS 5 Hands-On Video, YouTube creator Hot Hardware asked Nvidia employees this question about the computational cost of DLSS 5 when you move around in the game and it really caught my eye on how they hesitated on showing any DLSS 5 footage during motion. Every time that he moved the character, he would turn off DLSS 5 first then move to a different in-game location and then turn it on, or if DLSS 5 was turned on the movement was very slow and controlled. I know this is still work in progress, but it really begs the question "why wouldn't they show any this?" or "why show DLSS 5 this early?" I tried freezing some shots when another character is in motion to check if there are any artifacts when DLSS 5 is turned on. As suspected, I did come across some artifacts with UI elements, character popping out of the UI element and ghosting/artifacts behind the character. Its still not the best way to judge these small details that you can clearly see if a footage is recorded in-game, but then again its not like Nvidia provided any of them during DLSS 5 marketing campaign. Whenever this is still going to be present by the time DLSS 5 launches remains to be seen, however as of right now it doesn't look like it will handle fast-paced motion quite well and I don't know how well this "controlled AI-generated" rendering will scale to weaker GPUs in the RTX 50 series

During DLSS 5 Hands-On Video, YouTube creator Hot Hardware asked Nvidia employees this question about the computational cost of DLSS 5 when you move around in the game and it really caught my eye on how they hesitated on showing any DLSS 5 footage during motion. Every time that he moved the character, he would turn off DLSS 5 first then move to a different in-game location and then turn it on, or if DLSS 5 was turned on the movement was very slow and controlled. I know this is still work in progress, but it really begs the question "why wouldn't they show any this?" or "why show DLSS 5 this early?" I tried freezing some shots when another character is in motion to check if there are any artifacts when DLSS 5 is turned on. As suspected, I did come across some artifacts with UI elements, character popping out of the UI element and ghosting/artifacts behind the character. Its still not the best way to judge these small details that you can clearly see if a footage is recorded in-game, but then again its not like Nvidia provided any of them during DLSS 5 marketing campaign. Whenever this is still going to be present by the time DLSS 5 launches remains to be seen, however as of right now it doesn't look like it will handle fast-paced motion quite well and I don't know how well this "controlled AI-generated" rendering will scale to weaker GPUs in the RTX 50 series

NikTek

210,606 次观看 • 5 个月前

o1-pro is probably the best model i've used for coding, hands down i gave it a pretty complicated codebase and asked it to refactor while referencing docs the difference between claude/gemini/o1 and o1 pro is night and day. first time in a while i've been this impressed. full comparison in the video + code.

o1-pro is probably the best model i've used for coding, hands down i gave it a pretty complicated codebase and asked it to refactor while referencing docs the difference between claude/gemini/o1 and o1 pro is night and day. first time in a while i've been this impressed. full comparison in the video + code.

Sully

255,372 次观看 • 1 年前

One of the biggest visual upgrades with DLSS 4.5 is how it handles disocclusion. The new presets, even when upscaling from a lower internal resolution, do a better job reconstructing newly exposed/previously occluded objects and fine details compared to Preset K.

One of the biggest visual upgrades with DLSS 4.5 is how it handles disocclusion. The new presets, even when upscaling from a lower internal resolution, do a better job reconstructing newly exposed/previously occluded objects and fine details compared to Preset K.

BenchmarKing

53,650 次观看 • 7 个月前

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

Om Patel

696,175 次观看 • 4 个月前

I've been messing around with the leaked DLSS 5 on the 4070 Super, and, tbh, I'm really impressed by some of the things it can do. The way it can enhance and refine the game's lighting is particularly impressive, it adds more depth to the GI and enhance the ambient shading while also altering materials properties (Roughness, specularity, ect). But I'm still not impressed by what it does to character faces. They may look great in screenshots but when they move or talk, most of the time they have that waxy, generated AI look which I personally don't like. That said, it's great that this leaked version of DLSS 5 comes with a lot of sliders to tweak the intensity and find a balance that looks more natural. I just hope the official version keeps the same level of tweaking, or at least comes with different presets and options. As for performance, this is obviously not something aimed at mid-range or low-end GPUs, at least for now. The performance cost is massive, and I don't think it's worth using unless you have a high-end GPU with a lot of performance to spare.

I've been messing around with the leaked DLSS 5 on the 4070 Super, and, tbh, I'm really impressed by some of the things it can do. The way it can enhance and refine the game's lighting is particularly impressive, it adds more depth to the GI and enhance the ambient shading while also altering materials properties (Roughness, specularity, ect). But I'm still not impressed by what it does to character faces. They may look great in screenshots but when they move or talk, most of the time they have that waxy, generated AI look which I personally don't like. That said, it's great that this leaked version of DLSS 5 comes with a lot of sliders to tweak the intensity and find a balance that looks more natural. I just hope the official version keeps the same level of tweaking, or at least comes with different presets and options. As for performance, this is obviously not something aimed at mid-range or low-end GPUs, at least for now. The performance cost is massive, and I don't think it's worth using unless you have a high-end GPU with a lot of performance to spare.

BenchmarKing

27,247 次观看 • 1 天前

🚨 CN PLAYERS ARE ALREADY EXPERIMENTING WITH DLSS 5 IN NTE. This is NOT the official NTE DLSS 5 release, so keep that in mind. Some CN players have been testing an unofficial pre-release DLSS 5 build on RTX 50 Series GPUs, and the results are honestly fascinating. 👀 The biggest difference isn't just sharper graphics. DLSS 5 can dramatically change how the game renders: ✅ Skin ✅ Hair ✅ Materials ✅ Lighting ✅ Shadows ✅ Fabric ✅ Character depth In some scenes NTE starts looking MUCH more realistic. But it definitely isn't perfect yet. Players are also reporting: ⚠️ Characters looking too realistic or "plastic" ⚠️ Stronger AI-reconstructed appearance in shadows ⚠️ Visual artifacts ⚠️ Occasional instability ⚠️ Extremely heavy GPU requirements And that's important because this experimental version has NOT been properly optimized or adapted for NTE yet. The finished version could look very different. What makes this especially interesting is that NTE is already OFFICIALLY confirmed to receive DLSS 5 later. So I'm not looking at these tests as "this is what NTE will look like." I'm looking at them as a very early glimpse of what this technology could potentially do once Hotta and NVIDIA properly integrate it. And THAT has me extremely curious. 🔥 Would you want NTE characters to become more realistic like this, or should Hotta preserve the current anime look as much as possible? #NTE #NevernessToEverness #NTEネバエバ #NTECreator

🚨 CN PLAYERS ARE ALREADY EXPERIMENTING WITH DLSS 5 IN NTE. This is NOT the official NTE DLSS 5 release, so keep that in mind. Some CN players have been testing an unofficial pre-release DLSS 5 build on RTX 50 Series GPUs, and the results are honestly fascinating. 👀 The biggest difference isn't just sharper graphics. DLSS 5 can dramatically change how the game renders: ✅ Skin ✅ Hair ✅ Materials ✅ Lighting ✅ Shadows ✅ Fabric ✅ Character depth In some scenes NTE starts looking MUCH more realistic. But it definitely isn't perfect yet. Players are also reporting: ⚠️ Characters looking too realistic or "plastic" ⚠️ Stronger AI-reconstructed appearance in shadows ⚠️ Visual artifacts ⚠️ Occasional instability ⚠️ Extremely heavy GPU requirements And that's important because this experimental version has NOT been properly optimized or adapted for NTE yet. The finished version could look very different. What makes this especially interesting is that NTE is already OFFICIALLY confirmed to receive DLSS 5 later. So I'm not looking at these tests as "this is what NTE will look like." I'm looking at them as a very early glimpse of what this technology could potentially do once Hotta and NVIDIA properly integrate it. And THAT has me extremely curious. 🔥 Would you want NTE characters to become more realistic like this, or should Hotta preserve the current anime look as much as possible? #NTE #NevernessToEverness #NTEネバエバ #NTECreator

FroGGy🐸

118,298 次观看 • 2 天前

Anthropic is secretly nerfing Opus 4.6 and hoping you won't notice. I have proof: Evidence is stacking up that 4.6 is getting brutally quantized to handle demand, while 4.5 stays pristine. Fresh benchmarks reveal a devastating gap: > Opus 4.6: Logic failures on repeat. > Opus 4.5: Nails it every single time. One dev now runs a "Quantization Canary" a diagnostic prompt fired at the start of every session. He just watched five 4.6 windows fail back-to-back. His verdict: "Switched to 4.5 and it felt like I finally got my brain back." If the model feels dumber lately, trust your gut. You're being throttled so they can save on compute. Switch to 4.5. The difference is night and day.

Anthropic is secretly nerfing Opus 4.6 and hoping you won't notice. I have proof: Evidence is stacking up that 4.6 is getting brutally quantized to handle demand, while 4.5 stays pristine. Fresh benchmarks reveal a devastating gap: > Opus 4.6: Logic failures on repeat. > Opus 4.5: Nails it every single time. One dev now runs a "Quantization Canary" a diagnostic prompt fired at the start of every session. He just watched five 4.6 windows fail back-to-back. His verdict: "Switched to 4.5 and it felt like I finally got my brain back." If the model feels dumber lately, trust your gut. You're being throttled so they can save on compute. Switch to 4.5. The difference is night and day.

Ziwen

130,869 次观看 • 4 个月前

introducing character consistency for videos. now you can upload the image of a character using Hailuo and preserve their identity in all your videos. try it now!

introducing character consistency for videos. now you can upload the image of a character using Hailuo and preserve their identity in all your videos. try it now!

Krea

132,283 次观看 • 1 年前

I've been trying to move from imperative prompting to declarative prompting. • Imperative prompting: I tell the agent how to do something. • Declarative prompting: I describe my goal to the agent. This was impossible before, but since Opus 4.5, I'm letting models fill in the blanks more and more. I recorded a video using Quest + Opus 4.5. This is a coding agent designed specifically for this purpose.

I've been trying to move from imperative prompting to declarative prompting. • Imperative prompting: I tell the agent how to do something. • Declarative prompting: I describe my goal to the agent. This was impossible before, but since Opus 4.5, I'm letting models fill in the blanks more and more. I recorded a video using Quest + Opus 4.5. This is a coding agent designed specifically for this purpose.

Santiago

96,507 次观看 • 7 个月前