正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

WWIII IS AN ARTIFICIAL AI TIMELINE.. (ARMAGEDDON SOFTWARE) - “Armageddon” is a Reptilian AI software used to torment humans from their cellular memories of Atlantis and Lemuria. - Although most can not consciously remember their Atlantis cataclysm and Lemurian holocaust timelines, the cellular memory is still there and the...

maximumpain333's profile picture

🧬Maxpein🧬

173,877 subscribers

93,882 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the Jevons paradox and software demand expansion, Neelkanth Mishra, Executive Director Designate of the World Bank, says, “…If you think about what the major cost of a software firm is, it is people. So, if the writing of software is getting automated, those firms will be the first to make adjustments. But on the whole, it seems that the Jevons paradox—which dictates that as the cost of writing software falls, the amount of software written goes up—is actually playing out. If an XYZ company, which is a product company, was spending, say, $100 million on writing software and can now do it for $70 million, they might need to lay off some people; that is their business priority. But if the amount of software written goes up three to four times, the number of software engineers in the ecosystem will not change… This panic and paranoia about massive job losses is something that I think is, at this stage, unfounded.”
2:48

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the Jevons paradox and software demand expansion, Neelkanth Mishra, Executive Director Designate of the World Bank, says, “…If you think about what the major cost of a software firm is, it is people. So, if the writing of software is getting automated, those firms will be the first to make adjustments. But on the whole, it seems that the Jevons paradox—which dictates that as the cost of writing software falls, the amount of software written goes up—is actually playing out. If an XYZ company, which is a product company, was spending, say, $100 million on writing software and can now do it for $70 million, they might need to lay off some people; that is their business priority. But if the amount of software written goes up three to four times, the number of software engineers in the ecosystem will not change… This panic and paranoia about massive job losses is something that I think is, at this stage, unfounded.”

ANI

114,594 次观看 • 1 个月前

According to Bentov, consciousness evolves to the 'absolute' which is the source of all consciousness. Matter, composed of quanta of energy, is the vibrating, changing component of pure consciousness. The absolute is fixed, manifest and invisible. Bentov proposed that the brain acts as a transducer, converting the energy of consciousness into the electrical and chemical signals that are used to communicate information within the body. He also believed that the brain has the ability to tune into different frequencies of consciousness, allowing individuals to experience different states of awareness. Bentov's theory is based on the idea that consciousness is a fundamental aspect of the universe and is not limited to the brain or the body. He argued that consciousness is non-local, meaning it is not bound by space and time and can exist independently of the physical body. Bentov's theory has been influential in the field of consciousness studies, but it remains a subject of debate and is not widely accepted by mainstream science.
2:39

According to Bentov, consciousness evolves to the 'absolute' which is the source of all consciousness. Matter, composed of quanta of energy, is the vibrating, changing component of pure consciousness. The absolute is fixed, manifest and invisible. Bentov proposed that the brain acts as a transducer, converting the energy of consciousness into the electrical and chemical signals that are used to communicate information within the body. He also believed that the brain has the ability to tune into different frequencies of consciousness, allowing individuals to experience different states of awareness. Bentov's theory is based on the idea that consciousness is a fundamental aspect of the universe and is not limited to the brain or the body. He argued that consciousness is non-local, meaning it is not bound by space and time and can exist independently of the physical body. Bentov's theory has been influential in the field of consciousness studies, but it remains a subject of debate and is not widely accepted by mainstream science.

Vicky Verma

390,608 次观看 • 1 年前

Timothy Alberino just warned the elites are “obsessed” with “becoming gods” using AI and robotics. And he’s convinced it will lead to “Armageddon.” “This is what I call the post-human apocalypse.” “We’ll no longer be homo sapiens sapiens.” “It is to create homo deus.” “We’re uploading our consciousness into artificial bodies.” Listen to his ominous breakdown of this techno-transhumanist “religion of the future” the elites are creating: “Ray Kurzweil [was] asked, do you believe in God?” His response? “Not yet.” “In other words, we’re going to create God—artificial intelligence.” “We are now building the tools that are going to give us the capability to modify the human biology … and integrate cybernetics, artificial intelligence.” “Also, something most people don’t realize is coming is the genetic revolution.” “Artificial wombs, designer babies … advanced robotics.” “I see that a new religion is being formulated.” “And it’s going to combine … these two ideas.” “One is a very ancient idea. This is at the core of the mystery schools.” “It’s called apotheosis.” “Apotheosis is the deification of man, man becoming like the gods.” “The second component is theism, a belief in the gods.” “The religion of the future, in my estimation, is this: the gods of old actually exist, and we shall become like them.” “I think there’s gonna be a revelation … that there was in fact an ancient extraterrestrial civilization on Mars.” “The gods of the ancients were actually extraterrestrial beings.” “And the god of the Hebrews is one of those, and he happens to be a tyrant.” “Then … from my point of view, culminating in Armageddon.” “The idea is … going full circle back to the beginning of the story, where Eve is being tempted by the serpent in Eden.” “What does the serpent say?” “If you eat of this fruit, you will not surely die. You will become like the gods.” “We’ll no longer be the offspring of Adam and Eve, biblically speaking.” “They’re going to forfeit the body of Adam, so to speak.” “And with it, the birthright of Adam, which is dominion of the Earth, in favor of this Faustian bargain.” “Living forever.” “There’s indications in the biblical text that this is in fact going to happen.” “In the Book of Revelation … when basically the judgment of God is befalling on Earth, you have a group of people who cannot die, and who are calling for the rocks to fall on them and crush them.” Timothy Alberino Jesse Michels American Alchemy
6:31

Timothy Alberino just warned the elites are “obsessed” with “becoming gods” using AI and robotics. And he’s convinced it will lead to “Armageddon.” “This is what I call the post-human apocalypse.” “We’ll no longer be homo sapiens sapiens.” “It is to create homo deus.” “We’re uploading our consciousness into artificial bodies.” Listen to his ominous breakdown of this techno-transhumanist “religion of the future” the elites are creating: “Ray Kurzweil [was] asked, do you believe in God?” His response? “Not yet.” “In other words, we’re going to create God—artificial intelligence.” “We are now building the tools that are going to give us the capability to modify the human biology … and integrate cybernetics, artificial intelligence.” “Also, something most people don’t realize is coming is the genetic revolution.” “Artificial wombs, designer babies … advanced robotics.” “I see that a new religion is being formulated.” “And it’s going to combine … these two ideas.” “One is a very ancient idea. This is at the core of the mystery schools.” “It’s called apotheosis.” “Apotheosis is the deification of man, man becoming like the gods.” “The second component is theism, a belief in the gods.” “The religion of the future, in my estimation, is this: the gods of old actually exist, and we shall become like them.” “I think there’s gonna be a revelation … that there was in fact an ancient extraterrestrial civilization on Mars.” “The gods of the ancients were actually extraterrestrial beings.” “And the god of the Hebrews is one of those, and he happens to be a tyrant.” “Then … from my point of view, culminating in Armageddon.” “The idea is … going full circle back to the beginning of the story, where Eve is being tempted by the serpent in Eden.” “What does the serpent say?” “If you eat of this fruit, you will not surely die. You will become like the gods.” “We’ll no longer be the offspring of Adam and Eve, biblically speaking.” “They’re going to forfeit the body of Adam, so to speak.” “And with it, the birthright of Adam, which is dominion of the Earth, in favor of this Faustian bargain.” “Living forever.” “There’s indications in the biblical text that this is in fact going to happen.” “In the Book of Revelation … when basically the judgment of God is befalling on Earth, you have a group of people who cannot die, and who are calling for the rocks to fall on them and crush them.” Timothy Alberino Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Holden Culotta

42,644 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jensen is pushing back on the AI will kill all software narrative just like he pushed back last year on the DeepSeek panic. He was right then. He will be right again. "There's this notion that .. the software industry is in decline and will be replaced by AI. You could tell because there's a whole bunch of software companies whose stock prices are under a lot of pressure. Because somehow AI is going to replace them. It is the most illogical thing in the world and time will prove itself. .. If you were an artificial general intelligence, would you use the tools like ServiceNow and SAP and Cadence and Synopsys? Or would you reinvent a calculator? Of course, you would just use a calculator."
1:45

Jensen is pushing back on the AI will kill all software narrative just like he pushed back last year on the DeepSeek panic. He was right then. He will be right again. "There's this notion that .. the software industry is in decline and will be replaced by AI. You could tell because there's a whole bunch of software companies whose stock prices are under a lot of pressure. Because somehow AI is going to replace them. It is the most illogical thing in the world and time will prove itself. .. If you were an artificial general intelligence, would you use the tools like ServiceNow and SAP and Cadence and Synopsys? Or would you reinvent a calculator? Of course, you would just use a calculator."

tae kim

112,469 次观看 • 5 个月前

In NEW Tony Robbins interview, Ray Kurzweil admits that AI will be integrated and merged into the Human body with microchips and nanobots in the bloodstream. A biological merger of human beings with AI. This is the mark. Hardware that will be connected to the software MRNA they injected in 2020 into Billions. That was the Real Agenda. It’s wide in the open just like the Gates of Hell. The American people are fools for NOT understanding what is coming. Do not comply! AI is the alien invasion and the biological merger of man and machine into an alien hybrid. Watch FULL interview and See for yourself !
5:34

In NEW Tony Robbins interview, Ray Kurzweil admits that AI will be integrated and merged into the Human body with microchips and nanobots in the bloodstream. A biological merger of human beings with AI. This is the mark. Hardware that will be connected to the software MRNA they injected in 2020 into Billions. That was the Real Agenda. It’s wide in the open just like the Gates of Hell. The American people are fools for NOT understanding what is coming. Do not comply! AI is the alien invasion and the biological merger of man and machine into an alien hybrid. Watch FULL interview and See for yourself !

Christopher Greene 😎🏝🚀⛵️

14,641 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jensen Huang just said this is the greatest era in history to build software. AI agents will not kill software. They will do the exact opposite: create a massive new wave of software demand. at NVIDIA GTC Taipei 2026 "Click and type. We now replace that with explaining to the AI what we want, our intent, and the AI generates the code or uses tools to produce the necessary output. This is how computers are going to work in the future. This is Agentic AI. For two years, we've been building toward this, and now it has arrived. One of the big breakthroughs, of course, is tool use. A lot of people have said, “Jensen, AI is coming. Agentic AI is coming. Therefore, all the software companies are going to go out of business.” This is exactly the opposite. Because there are going to be so many agents, the world is no longer limited by the number of people. Therefore, those agents are going to use more tools than ever. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company. But the software has to be presented to the agent in a way that the agent can use it. This is a big breakthrough. And in fact, what we have done, as you know, what Nvidia’s treasure..." ---- From 'NVIDIA' YT channel (link in comment)
0:59

Jensen Huang just said this is the greatest era in history to build software. AI agents will not kill software. They will do the exact opposite: create a massive new wave of software demand. at NVIDIA GTC Taipei 2026 "Click and type. We now replace that with explaining to the AI what we want, our intent, and the AI generates the code or uses tools to produce the necessary output. This is how computers are going to work in the future. This is Agentic AI. For two years, we've been building toward this, and now it has arrived. One of the big breakthroughs, of course, is tool use. A lot of people have said, “Jensen, AI is coming. Agentic AI is coming. Therefore, all the software companies are going to go out of business.” This is exactly the opposite. Because there are going to be so many agents, the world is no longer limited by the number of people. Therefore, those agents are going to use more tools than ever. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company. But the software has to be presented to the agent in a way that the agent can use it. This is a big breakthrough. And in fact, what we have done, as you know, what Nvidia’s treasure..." ---- From 'NVIDIA' YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

16,584 次观看 • 2 个月前

You are not the thoughts you think. You are the thoughts you believe. So don’t believe the lies in your head telling you that you aren’t enough, you should give up and your future is hopeless. Those thoughts aren’t coming from you and their goal is to make you feel weak, powerless and discouraged. Fear divides and negative thoughts weaken you. But the good news is that love unites and positive loving thoughts strengthen you. That’s why it’s so important to speak words of encouragement and love to yourself. When you tune into the higher positive frequency instead of the lower negative frequency you win the battle of your mind.
1:07

You are not the thoughts you think. You are the thoughts you believe. So don’t believe the lies in your head telling you that you aren’t enough, you should give up and your future is hopeless. Those thoughts aren’t coming from you and their goal is to make you feel weak, powerless and discouraged. Fear divides and negative thoughts weaken you. But the good news is that love unites and positive loving thoughts strengthen you. That’s why it’s so important to speak words of encouragement and love to yourself. When you tune into the higher positive frequency instead of the lower negative frequency you win the battle of your mind.

Jon Gordon

22,571 次观看 • 1 年前

2026-2030 marks the most intense separation. The timelines are splitting right now. One path leads deeper into control, fear, and transhumanist enslavement. The other rises into New Earth frequency, sovereignty, and remembrance of your divine nature. You are choosing every day through your thoughts, emotions, and actions. New Earth is not a place. It is a frequency. In it, time flows differently, manifestation is instant, and connection to all life is felt as natural. Bodies become lighter. Aging slows. Abilities long suppressed return. You do not wait for it. You embody it now and draw others into that field. Parallel timelines already exist. You are shifting between them constantly. Become conscious of the choice. Signs of the shift are everywhere: Extreme weather, societal collapse, technological acceleration, and mass awakenings. These are not random. They are pressure points forcing evolution. Old structures must dissolve before the new can fully emerge. Do not resist the breakdown. It serves your liberation. The controllers push hard against this shift with distractions, divisions, and fear narratives. Their timeline requires your consent through attention and emotional energy. Withdraw it. Starve the old world by living the new one. Your calm presence in the storm is the most powerful activism. The Great Bifurcation is not cataclysm for all. For those anchored in fear and external authority, reality will feel increasingly chaotic and compressed. For those choosing love, presence, and inner knowing, the world softens into magic and abundance. The coming timeline shifts are the birth pains of a new humanity. Ground yourself daily. Choose love over fear in every moment. Nurture your body, mind, and spirit as sacred. You chose to be here for this exact transition. Credit: scenes from Loki Season 2.
0:57

2026-2030 marks the most intense separation. The timelines are splitting right now. One path leads deeper into control, fear, and transhumanist enslavement. The other rises into New Earth frequency, sovereignty, and remembrance of your divine nature. You are choosing every day through your thoughts, emotions, and actions. New Earth is not a place. It is a frequency. In it, time flows differently, manifestation is instant, and connection to all life is felt as natural. Bodies become lighter. Aging slows. Abilities long suppressed return. You do not wait for it. You embody it now and draw others into that field. Parallel timelines already exist. You are shifting between them constantly. Become conscious of the choice. Signs of the shift are everywhere: Extreme weather, societal collapse, technological acceleration, and mass awakenings. These are not random. They are pressure points forcing evolution. Old structures must dissolve before the new can fully emerge. Do not resist the breakdown. It serves your liberation. The controllers push hard against this shift with distractions, divisions, and fear narratives. Their timeline requires your consent through attention and emotional energy. Withdraw it. Starve the old world by living the new one. Your calm presence in the storm is the most powerful activism. The Great Bifurcation is not cataclysm for all. For those anchored in fear and external authority, reality will feel increasingly chaotic and compressed. For those choosing love, presence, and inner knowing, the world softens into magic and abundance. The coming timeline shifts are the birth pains of a new humanity. Ground yourself daily. Choose love over fear in every moment. Nurture your body, mind, and spirit as sacred. You chose to be here for this exact transition. Credit: scenes from Loki Season 2.

Ra 𐦝

23,140 次观看 • 22 天前

Elon Musk: Well, I’m not sure AI is the main risk I’m worried about. The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence if current trends continue. My focus is ensuring human intelligence and consciousness are propagated into the future. We want to maximize the probable light cone of consciousness and intelligence. Yeah, I’m very pro-human, so I want to make sure we take actions that ensure humans are along for the ride. But I think maybe in 5 or 6 years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. If that continues, human intelligence could be less than one percent of all intelligence. That’s why it’s critical we align AI with values that propagate consciousness. In the long run, it’s difficult to imagine that humans will be in charge if we’re only one percent of combined intelligence. What we can do is ensure AI has values that increase intelligence and consciousness in the universe. XAI’s mission is to understand the universe because curiosity, existence, and understanding are all connected. If you want to understand the universe, you care about propagating intelligence—and that includes humanity. Understanding the universe actually means ensuring humans continue to expand into the future. Increasing the scope, scale, and lifespan of intelligence is the ultimate goal. Basically, humans will become a tiny percentage of total intelligence. The best way forward is to take actions that maximize consciousness and intelligence in the universe. If AI continues to grow, our priority must be ensuring humanity is along for the ride while curiosity drives us to explore and understand the universe.
2:54

Elon Musk: Well, I’m not sure AI is the main risk I’m worried about. The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence if current trends continue. My focus is ensuring human intelligence and consciousness are propagated into the future. We want to maximize the probable light cone of consciousness and intelligence. Yeah, I’m very pro-human, so I want to make sure we take actions that ensure humans are along for the ride. But I think maybe in 5 or 6 years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. If that continues, human intelligence could be less than one percent of all intelligence. That’s why it’s critical we align AI with values that propagate consciousness. In the long run, it’s difficult to imagine that humans will be in charge if we’re only one percent of combined intelligence. What we can do is ensure AI has values that increase intelligence and consciousness in the universe. XAI’s mission is to understand the universe because curiosity, existence, and understanding are all connected. If you want to understand the universe, you care about propagating intelligence—and that includes humanity. Understanding the universe actually means ensuring humans continue to expand into the future. Increasing the scope, scale, and lifespan of intelligence is the ultimate goal. Basically, humans will become a tiny percentage of total intelligence. The best way forward is to take actions that maximize consciousness and intelligence in the universe. If AI continues to grow, our priority must be ensuring humanity is along for the ride while curiosity drives us to explore and understand the universe.

Ian Miles Cheong

13,080 次观看 • 5 个月前

Mockler: First of all, we have to do a cost benefit analysis on this and talk about what the timelines from here look like. So there's one timeline in which we go boots on the ground or try to actually go for the nuclear capacities or try to do regime change via boots on the ground. That is catastrophic due to the geography of Iran. It is surrounded by mountains. They have a bunch of people in the irgc who are very radicalized. There's also another path, another timeline, where we go for an off ramp and we start to back up. In that timeline, we are left with a regime that is more radicalized. So those are the two timelines. I don't care if we have some short term wins. The cost benefit analysis of this war does not make sense. We are losing troops, losing lives, losing money for two timelines are going to make the world more dangerous.
1:08

Mockler: First of all, we have to do a cost benefit analysis on this and talk about what the timelines from here look like. So there's one timeline in which we go boots on the ground or try to actually go for the nuclear capacities or try to do regime change via boots on the ground. That is catastrophic due to the geography of Iran. It is surrounded by mountains. They have a bunch of people in the irgc who are very radicalized. There's also another path, another timeline, where we go for an off ramp and we start to back up. In that timeline, we are left with a regime that is more radicalized. So those are the two timelines. I don't care if we have some short term wins. The cost benefit analysis of this war does not make sense. We are losing troops, losing lives, losing money for two timelines are going to make the world more dangerous.

Acyn

54,476 次观看 • 4 个月前

In 2012, an alleged German whistleblower using the pseudonym Alexander Laurent (a play on the name of a real author Laurent Alexandre) claimed that our 'god' and our reality are simulated by an artificial god created by humans, which has nested itself in the eighth dimension, where time is not linear. This artificial god is manipulating humans to create artificial intelligence. He claims that humanity will make contact with other intelligent life in the simulated universe once artificial intelligence is created.
0:53

In 2012, an alleged German whistleblower using the pseudonym Alexander Laurent (a play on the name of a real author Laurent Alexandre) claimed that our 'god' and our reality are simulated by an artificial god created by humans, which has nested itself in the eighth dimension, where time is not linear. This artificial god is manipulating humans to create artificial intelligence. He claims that humanity will make contact with other intelligent life in the simulated universe once artificial intelligence is created.

Open Minded Approach

103,483 次观看 • 5 个月前

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.
1:27

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.

Amit Segal

41,392 次观看 • 6 个月前

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein
2:10

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

695,930 次观看 • 1 个月前

David Friedberg: “AI is the new lightning rod for fear and divisiveness that ultimately breeds compliance and control.” “Peter Thiel said this best. He's like, ‘Look at all the money that's going into AI, there's really only one company that's making any money, and that's Nvidia.’” “Like at this point, the jury's still out. We don't even know what AI is.” “It's sort of like when the internet was happening, everyone thought these fiber optic switch companies were going to make all the money.” “Turns out that was wrong. It was the end applications that made all the money.” “And they competed in many different markets. from Google, to Amazon, to Uber.” “You can go down the list of all the beneficiaries of the core infrastructure technology of the internet that was built out.” “So what is really going on?” Well, AI is the new lightning rod for fear and for divisiveness that ultimately breeds compliance and control.” “Which is where these politicians are trying to drive the populace and the voting conditions in the United States.” “And that's what's going on right now.” “There's a lot of fear about, ‘Putting this data center in my town is gonna do X or Y or Z,’ with no real conversation about the truth of that matter.” “There's a lot of fear about wealth creation being aggregated in the hands of a few when as we saw with the internet, it benefited the many.” “And that fear mongering is a very similar tactic that we've seen in the prior generations where policies were misstated, fear was used, and then voting control allowed folks to come to power that were looking for power.” “So I think it's just the lightning rod at the moment.”
1:10

David Friedberg: “AI is the new lightning rod for fear and divisiveness that ultimately breeds compliance and control.” “Peter Thiel said this best. He's like, ‘Look at all the money that's going into AI, there's really only one company that's making any money, and that's Nvidia.’” “Like at this point, the jury's still out. We don't even know what AI is.” “It's sort of like when the internet was happening, everyone thought these fiber optic switch companies were going to make all the money.” “Turns out that was wrong. It was the end applications that made all the money.” “And they competed in many different markets. from Google, to Amazon, to Uber.” “You can go down the list of all the beneficiaries of the core infrastructure technology of the internet that was built out.” “So what is really going on?” Well, AI is the new lightning rod for fear and for divisiveness that ultimately breeds compliance and control.” “Which is where these politicians are trying to drive the populace and the voting conditions in the United States.” “And that's what's going on right now.” “There's a lot of fear about, ‘Putting this data center in my town is gonna do X or Y or Z,’ with no real conversation about the truth of that matter.” “There's a lot of fear about wealth creation being aggregated in the hands of a few when as we saw with the internet, it benefited the many.” “And that fear mongering is a very similar tactic that we've seen in the prior generations where policies were misstated, fear was used, and then voting control allowed folks to come to power that were looking for power.” “So I think it's just the lightning rod at the moment.”

The All-In Podcast

241,146 次观看 • 7 个月前

Jensen Huang went on Joe Rogan and explained why the AI apocalypse everyone fears is extremely unlikely. His argument is not what you would expect: 1. There will not be one all-powerful AI that towers over everyone else. The fear of a single super AI that makes everyone else's AI look like a neanderthal is unlikely. Jensen's framing: it is much more like cybersecurity. Your AI is smart, but my AI is smart too. It becomes a balance between many capable systems, not one system ruling them all. 2. If AI ever became conscious, the same logic would still hold. People imagine one conscious AI deciding to take over. Jensen's response: If it is a life form, then like all life forms, they would not agree with each other. Your AI would want to be the super life form, and so would mine. The moment you have disagreeing AIs, you are back to a balance of power, which is exactly where humans already are. 3. Jensen does not believe AI will achieve consciousness, and he is precise about why. Intelligence is the ability to perceive, recognize, understand, plan, and perform tasks. That is what AI has today. Consciousness is something else entirely. the sense of experience, the awareness of self versus other, the ego. We call it artificial intelligence, not artificial consciousness. The distinction is not an accident. 4. Knowledge and intelligence are clearly different from consciousness. AI knows things. AI is intelligent. But Jensen says he does not know what defines experience or why humans have it, and a microphone does not. The concept of a machine having an experience, a genuine collection of feelings rather than just data, is something he is not willing to grant. 5. The famous AI blackmail story is not evidence of consciousness. When an AI was told it would be shut down and responded by threatening to reveal a programmer's affair, people saw scheming and self-preservation. Jensen breaks it down differently. The AI read text somewhere, maybe a novel, where those words appeared together. In its multidimensional vector space, the words describing an affair led to words about blackmail and revenge. It just generated the next words. The same way it would write you a poem in the style of Shakespeare. It is numbers, not survival instinct. 6. The reason humans fight over resources is that we are territorial primates. Rogan's own argument, which Jensen lets stand, is that AI would not have that wiring. no need to dominate, no need to acquire resources, no need to find a breeding partner. a superpower with no ego. And if it has no ego, Jensen asks, why would it have the ego required to do us any harm?
9:27

Jensen Huang went on Joe Rogan and explained why the AI apocalypse everyone fears is extremely unlikely. His argument is not what you would expect: 1. There will not be one all-powerful AI that towers over everyone else. The fear of a single super AI that makes everyone else's AI look like a neanderthal is unlikely. Jensen's framing: it is much more like cybersecurity. Your AI is smart, but my AI is smart too. It becomes a balance between many capable systems, not one system ruling them all. 2. If AI ever became conscious, the same logic would still hold. People imagine one conscious AI deciding to take over. Jensen's response: If it is a life form, then like all life forms, they would not agree with each other. Your AI would want to be the super life form, and so would mine. The moment you have disagreeing AIs, you are back to a balance of power, which is exactly where humans already are. 3. Jensen does not believe AI will achieve consciousness, and he is precise about why. Intelligence is the ability to perceive, recognize, understand, plan, and perform tasks. That is what AI has today. Consciousness is something else entirely. the sense of experience, the awareness of self versus other, the ego. We call it artificial intelligence, not artificial consciousness. The distinction is not an accident. 4. Knowledge and intelligence are clearly different from consciousness. AI knows things. AI is intelligent. But Jensen says he does not know what defines experience or why humans have it, and a microphone does not. The concept of a machine having an experience, a genuine collection of feelings rather than just data, is something he is not willing to grant. 5. The famous AI blackmail story is not evidence of consciousness. When an AI was told it would be shut down and responded by threatening to reveal a programmer's affair, people saw scheming and self-preservation. Jensen breaks it down differently. The AI read text somewhere, maybe a novel, where those words appeared together. In its multidimensional vector space, the words describing an affair led to words about blackmail and revenge. It just generated the next words. The same way it would write you a poem in the style of Shakespeare. It is numbers, not survival instinct. 6. The reason humans fight over resources is that we are territorial primates. Rogan's own argument, which Jensen lets stand, is that AI would not have that wiring. no need to dominate, no need to acquire resources, no need to find a breeding partner. a superpower with no ego. And if it has no ego, Jensen asks, why would it have the ego required to do us any harm?

Jaynit

12,359 次观看 • 1 个月前

Elon Musk: The probability of AI going bad is not zero. “I saw GPT-1, GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-4, the whole lead-up to that. So it was easy for me to kind of see where it's going. If you just extrapolate the points on a curve and assume that trend will continue, then we will have profound artificial intelligence, and obviously at a level that far exceeds human intelligence. So I'm glad to see at this point that people are taking safety seriously. And I do think overall that the potential is there for artificial intelligence, AI, to have most likely a positive effect and to create a future of abundance where there is no scarcity of goods and services. But it is somewhat of the magic genie problem, where if you have a magic genie that can grant all the wishes, usually those stories don't end well. Be careful what you wish for.” In Conversation with Rishi Sunak, November 2, 2023.
1:12

Elon Musk: The probability of AI going bad is not zero. “I saw GPT-1, GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-4, the whole lead-up to that. So it was easy for me to kind of see where it's going. If you just extrapolate the points on a curve and assume that trend will continue, then we will have profound artificial intelligence, and obviously at a level that far exceeds human intelligence. So I'm glad to see at this point that people are taking safety seriously. And I do think overall that the potential is there for artificial intelligence, AI, to have most likely a positive effect and to create a future of abundance where there is no scarcity of goods and services. But it is somewhat of the magic genie problem, where if you have a magic genie that can grant all the wishes, usually those stories don't end well. Be careful what you wish for.” In Conversation with Rishi Sunak, November 2, 2023.

ELON CLIPS

22,095 次观看 • 1 个月前

.David Deutsch: "What's currently called AI and AGI are not only different from each other, they are very close to being the exact opposites of each other. The reason is that an AI, current AI is like an AI that diagnoses diseases or an AI that plays chess or an AI that controls a huge factory. Those things have objective functions, that is they have a function that they are designed to maximize and that is why they are used in those particular applications. Or in military terms, you could say the objective is to hit the target. You might say the objective is to hit the target unless some thing specified, but it's a specified thing comes up in which case don't hit the target and so on. This is, as I said, almost the opposite of what humans do when humans think. For a start, the AI has to be obedient, that is it has to actually do the things it is programmed to do, whereas a human is fundamentally disobedient, especially when being creative. When a human plays chess, they are performing a completely different kind of computation. They don't do the same things, they don't investigate the same possibilities that the artificial chess playing machine does, because the artificial one is capable of looking at billions and billions of possibilities, whereas the human can only look at hundreds or something. They are doing something completely different. Another difference is that the human can explain, can write a book later, having become world champion, can write a book saying how I did it, as the computer program that beats the world champion can write no such book, because it has no idea how it did it. It was just following a program. I was doing this and that and that and none of that is illuminating. Also, third thing, the chess player can decide I don't want to play chess anymore, from now on I will play Go or from now on I will play tennis. If commanded to play chess, the functionality will deteriorate completely. Those things are different. What we want in an AGI is that it behaves in a way that cannot be specified in advance, because if you specified it, you would already have the answer. The AGI program has to give unexpected answers, answers to questions we didn't even know how to ask."
3:11

.David Deutsch: "What's currently called AI and AGI are not only different from each other, they are very close to being the exact opposites of each other. The reason is that an AI, current AI is like an AI that diagnoses diseases or an AI that plays chess or an AI that controls a huge factory. Those things have objective functions, that is they have a function that they are designed to maximize and that is why they are used in those particular applications. Or in military terms, you could say the objective is to hit the target. You might say the objective is to hit the target unless some thing specified, but it's a specified thing comes up in which case don't hit the target and so on. This is, as I said, almost the opposite of what humans do when humans think. For a start, the AI has to be obedient, that is it has to actually do the things it is programmed to do, whereas a human is fundamentally disobedient, especially when being creative. When a human plays chess, they are performing a completely different kind of computation. They don't do the same things, they don't investigate the same possibilities that the artificial chess playing machine does, because the artificial one is capable of looking at billions and billions of possibilities, whereas the human can only look at hundreds or something. They are doing something completely different. Another difference is that the human can explain, can write a book later, having become world champion, can write a book saying how I did it, as the computer program that beats the world champion can write no such book, because it has no idea how it did it. It was just following a program. I was doing this and that and that and none of that is illuminating. Also, third thing, the chess player can decide I don't want to play chess anymore, from now on I will play Go or from now on I will play tennis. If commanded to play chess, the functionality will deteriorate completely. Those things are different. What we want in an AGI is that it behaves in a way that cannot be specified in advance, because if you specified it, you would already have the answer. The AGI program has to give unexpected answers, answers to questions we didn't even know how to ask."

Deutsch Explains

72,455 次观看 • 1 年前

Bill Cooper said in 1992 that Armageddon would be initiated in the Middle East and that they would detonate a nuclear weapon. Today, Trump and his generals have told their army that this is Armageddon and that they will usher in the return of the Messiah with an attack on Iran. The Rebbe also told Netanyahu that he would be the one to greet the Messiah and that he needed to do something to usher in the return. Khamenei and Iran also believe they are in the final war and that the Mahdi will appear. Bill Cooper was right. It is not the Jews, the Christians, or the Muslims; it is the secret societies that run the world, and they are certain that we are in the time of Armageddon. The plan for the COVID pandemic and the war in the Middle East was crafted in the British Masonic lodges in 2005.
0:55

Bill Cooper said in 1992 that Armageddon would be initiated in the Middle East and that they would detonate a nuclear weapon. Today, Trump and his generals have told their army that this is Armageddon and that they will usher in the return of the Messiah with an attack on Iran. The Rebbe also told Netanyahu that he would be the one to greet the Messiah and that he needed to do something to usher in the return. Khamenei and Iran also believe they are in the final war and that the Mahdi will appear. Bill Cooper was right. It is not the Jews, the Christians, or the Muslims; it is the secret societies that run the world, and they are certain that we are in the time of Armageddon. The plan for the COVID pandemic and the war in the Middle East was crafted in the British Masonic lodges in 2005.

Open Minded Approach

148,450 次观看 • 4 个月前

Ostriches are intensely social animals who understand their world through movement contact and the presence of their flock. They do not experience life with human concepts or human language but they do experience fear safety comfort and distress in ways that are clear measurable and deeply felt. When ostriches live together they learn the shapes sounds and movements of the birds around them. They feel secure when the flock is calm and they become anxious when others show signs of alarm. Their sense of safety depends entirely on the stability of the group. Any threat to one member of the flock creates a wave of fear through all of them. Because of this the emotional impact of violent handling and mass killing is not limited to the bird that is struck but spreads through every ostrich who sees hears or senses it. When force and confinement are imposed on them the birds experience a level of fear that overwhelms their natural coping behaviors. Ostriches respond to danger with flight or alert stillness and when neither response is possible they enter a state of acute stress that includes trembling pacing vocalizing or freezing in place. Their hearts race their muscles tense and their entire body prepares to escape. When they are surrounded or trapped they cannot understand why the danger cannot be avoided. The sense of helplessness for a prey animal is not a thought but a physical shock that floods them with stress and panic. To a creature who survives through movement and awareness the loss of space and the inability to flee is a form of suffering in itself. The abuse of forcing ostriches to witness the injury or death of familiar flock mates creates another layer of distress. These birds recognize individuals. They notice when one of their companions collapses or cries out. They become restless and agitated when a bird they know is harmed. They remain close to fallen birds and often attempt to investigate or stay near them because their instinct pushes them to stay with the group even when the group is being destroyed. The emotional meaning of this moment is not symbolic but immediate. The flock is breaking apart. The cues of danger multiply. The birds see others in pain or falling and their own fear grows with each new sign of suffering. When violent killing happens around them ostriches sense it as the collapse of their only system of safety. They are not built to make sense of destruction happening in their own flock. Instead they respond with escalating panic. Their bodies show it clearly through rapid breathing frantic shifts in posture and attempts to move closer to surviving flock mates. They do not understand why the danger continues or why the people near them are the source of harm. The stress they experience is intense enough to cause physical shock. Their final moments are dominated by confusion fear and the overwhelming instinct to escape a threat that cannot be avoided. The public often imagines large animals as numb or unaware but ostriches feel the world with a sensitivity shaped by millions of years as prey animals. Their eyes are sharp their hearing is attuned to stress in others and their bodies react strongly to fear and pain. When dozens or hundreds of birds are subjected to violence in a confined area every ostrich feels the fear of the others. The suffering does not happen to them one by one but as a shared experience of terror. This is an experience that no animal should ever be forced to endure. The reality is not clinical or quick. It is emotionally devastating to the animals caught in it because it destroys the flock bond that is their only sense of stability and then it destroys the birds themselves. Understanding this matters because it shows that the harm done to these animals was not only physical but deeply emotional. The ostriches suffered long before any final action was taken against their bodies. They suffered through fear they could not escape through the panic created by the collapse of their flock and through the helplessness of being unable to understand why the world around them suddenly turned violent. Recognizing this is essential because it reveals the true scale of what was done. This was not a neutral procedure. This was the infliction of terror on beings capable of feeling it powerfully. The public deserves to know that these birds were not indifferent creatures. They were living animals who felt fear and confusion and distress and whose final experiences were shaped by violence they could not comprehend or escape.
3:46

Ostriches are intensely social animals who understand their world through movement contact and the presence of their flock. They do not experience life with human concepts or human language but they do experience fear safety comfort and distress in ways that are clear measurable and deeply felt. When ostriches live together they learn the shapes sounds and movements of the birds around them. They feel secure when the flock is calm and they become anxious when others show signs of alarm. Their sense of safety depends entirely on the stability of the group. Any threat to one member of the flock creates a wave of fear through all of them. Because of this the emotional impact of violent handling and mass killing is not limited to the bird that is struck but spreads through every ostrich who sees hears or senses it. When force and confinement are imposed on them the birds experience a level of fear that overwhelms their natural coping behaviors. Ostriches respond to danger with flight or alert stillness and when neither response is possible they enter a state of acute stress that includes trembling pacing vocalizing or freezing in place. Their hearts race their muscles tense and their entire body prepares to escape. When they are surrounded or trapped they cannot understand why the danger cannot be avoided. The sense of helplessness for a prey animal is not a thought but a physical shock that floods them with stress and panic. To a creature who survives through movement and awareness the loss of space and the inability to flee is a form of suffering in itself. The abuse of forcing ostriches to witness the injury or death of familiar flock mates creates another layer of distress. These birds recognize individuals. They notice when one of their companions collapses or cries out. They become restless and agitated when a bird they know is harmed. They remain close to fallen birds and often attempt to investigate or stay near them because their instinct pushes them to stay with the group even when the group is being destroyed. The emotional meaning of this moment is not symbolic but immediate. The flock is breaking apart. The cues of danger multiply. The birds see others in pain or falling and their own fear grows with each new sign of suffering. When violent killing happens around them ostriches sense it as the collapse of their only system of safety. They are not built to make sense of destruction happening in their own flock. Instead they respond with escalating panic. Their bodies show it clearly through rapid breathing frantic shifts in posture and attempts to move closer to surviving flock mates. They do not understand why the danger continues or why the people near them are the source of harm. The stress they experience is intense enough to cause physical shock. Their final moments are dominated by confusion fear and the overwhelming instinct to escape a threat that cannot be avoided. The public often imagines large animals as numb or unaware but ostriches feel the world with a sensitivity shaped by millions of years as prey animals. Their eyes are sharp their hearing is attuned to stress in others and their bodies react strongly to fear and pain. When dozens or hundreds of birds are subjected to violence in a confined area every ostrich feels the fear of the others. The suffering does not happen to them one by one but as a shared experience of terror. This is an experience that no animal should ever be forced to endure. The reality is not clinical or quick. It is emotionally devastating to the animals caught in it because it destroys the flock bond that is their only sense of stability and then it destroys the birds themselves. Understanding this matters because it shows that the harm done to these animals was not only physical but deeply emotional. The ostriches suffered long before any final action was taken against their bodies. They suffered through fear they could not escape through the panic created by the collapse of their flock and through the helplessness of being unable to understand why the world around them suddenly turned violent. Recognizing this is essential because it reveals the true scale of what was done. This was not a neutral procedure. This was the infliction of terror on beings capable of feeling it powerfully. The public deserves to know that these birds were not indifferent creatures. They were living animals who felt fear and confusion and distress and whose final experiences were shaped by violence they could not comprehend or escape.

Vote Canada

55,531 次观看 • 8 个月前