Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Xíng Hài | 刑亥 | Thunderbolt Fantasy AMV

22,774 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Yesterday, during a Space hosted by .SITREP, .Azi I listened to .Malcolm Nance , describing how Iran could dominate U.S. armed forces in the Gulf. As someone who greatly respects him as an expert on these matters, I still found the analysis unconvincing from my layman's perspective. I forwarded the recording (below) to two far more knowledgeable people. One responded with a strategic-level critique (with a touch of humor), while the other dove into the tactical details. I'd welcome any comments here - and especially a response from Malcolm Nance himself. 1. Clausewitz, your narrative reads like a thriller novel, not a realistic assessment of Iran’s capabilities. The idea that the IRGC can seamlessly coordinate massed missile salvos, drone swarms, suicide boats, underwater vehicles, and mines simultaneously is pure fantasy. Recent events show Iran struggles even with modest synchronized operations - drones fail frequently, get intercepted easily, and ballistic missiles show inconsistent accuracy and reliability, far from the precise, perfectly timed strikes you describe. Quietly moving dozens of anti-ship missiles hundreds of kilometers for a synchronized national salvo ignores Iran’s chronic C2 problems, logistical bottlenecks, and constant U.S. ISR coverage of the terrain. Strategic surprise isn’t their strength. The U.S. isn’t fixated on the Strait of Hormuz as you assume. American strategy focuses on keeping Iran off balance, shaping the battlespace, and hitting Tehran’s weak points - often far from Hormuz. The U.S. enjoys overwhelming spectrum dominance, persistent ISR, and unmatched rapid-strike options. Your dramatic mountain-to-desert epic doesn’t match operational reality. Iran’s systems look impressive on paper, but large-scale, multi-domain coordination remains limited. The U.S. would dictate the tempo - not Tehran, and certainly not as you’ve imagined. 2. Malcolm, your assessment is outdated and fails to reflect 2026 operational realities in the ongoing conflict with Iran. The notion that the U.S. Navy is helpless against Iranian Fast Inshore Attack Craft (FIAC) due to carrier standoff distances is obsolete. The U.S. has deployed low-altitude, persistent platforms to counter these threats: - A-10 Thunderbolt II ("Warthog"): aircraft, operating from regional airbases, are actively hunting and destroying FIACs in the Strait of Hormuz. Armed with AGM-65 Mavericks, APKWS rockets, and the GAU-8/A Avenger cannon, they excel at loitering, visually acquiring, and engaging fast boats in cluttered littoral zones. Recent operations confirm A-10s "hunting and killing" Iranian fast-attack watercraft. - AH-64 Apache helicopters engage one-way attack drones and small naval targets with precision munitions alongside A-10s and allies. CENTCOM reports over 120 Iranian vessels destroyed-including swarm boats and mine layers-with operations ongoing to secure the Strait of Hormuz. Iran's shore-based anti-ship missiles remain a threat, but the claim of firing 50 simultaneously is unrealistic. U.S. and Israeli air dominance enables strikes on storage sites and launchers at the moment of attempted launch. Iran's capabilities are minimal and eroding daily through sustained attacks. While they may score a few ship hits-as in the 1980s or 2019 - these will not constitute victory. Within weeks, Iran's naval threat will be reduced to a minor obstacle, and safe navigation through the Strait of Hormuz will be fully restored. This isn't the 1980s: Carrier standoff is strategic; deep-strike assets neutralize missile threats while A-10s and Apaches dominate the littoral. FIACs can't "zoom out and vanish"- they're hunted in real time. U.S./Israeli forces execute large-scale coordinated attacks deep into Iran, with 89–92% of Iranian missiles/drones failing to reach targets.

Eyal Ofer אייל עופר

22,059 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

有志者、事竟成,破釜沉舟,百二秦关终属楚 苦心人、天不负,卧薪尝胆,三千越甲可吞吴 2025年4月12日晚,乌云压境,细雨纷纷,中国民主党党员们来到纽约时代广场进行致敬新公民运动领导人许志永和丁家喜的活动。 许志永是新公民运动的创始人,他在近二十年的时间里以和平的方式倡导中国的人权、民主和法治。2023年,许志永在一次闭门审判中以“颠覆国家政权罪”被判处14年监禁。 丁家喜曾经通过新公民运动支持当地独立候选人,呼吁官员公开财务状况,并倡导中国的财产权。2023年,中国共产党以“颠覆国家政权罪”判处他12年监禁。 下面摘录丁家喜在法庭上的陈述: 从辛亥革命算起,时间过去了一百多年,经历了几辈人的牺牲,中国人民依然生活在政治上受压迫,经济上受控制,思想上受奴役的状态。独裁者及其特权利益集团,不断用高技术手段强化他们的专制统治。但是文明正以强大的力量推动着历史的进程,一场民主与专制的战役正在展开,他们的终身独裁和长期一党专政的妄想正在走向末日,中国的社会转型正在日益临近。 避免转型时期的社会动荡和人民的痛苦,一直是我们的真诚愿望,我们确信和平理性非暴力是中国转型的最为稳定的模式。面对很多质疑,遇到很多困难,遭受很多挫折,以及个人被酷刑折磨,都不会改变我坚守的理念。 所有关心民族前途的中国人,都需要担起我们这一代人的历史责任,这个责任就是根除专制,建设美好中国。这需要我们克服心中的恐惧,大声地发出正义的呐喊,坚决地反对独裁者,坚决地反对特权利益集团,拒绝他们的专制统治。只要我们一起努力,自由之光、民主之光和法治之光一定会照亮神州大地! 中国的巨变迫在眉睫,即使身在高墙之内,我也能清晰地感觉到。文明的脚步如同惊蛰的雷声!我们看到了这样一副景象:中国人民将从极度奴役中清醒过来,看透他们用道德谎言编织的各种公义,看清事实真相,只要人民不再信任和服从他们的专制统治,独裁者及其特权利益集团的特权就会崩溃。我一直认为他们非常卖力的反向学习了人类文明进步的历史经验,堵死了专制政权垮台的1000种可能,但专制政权依然会以第1001种方式垮台,这是历史的规律,让我们开始倒计时:五四三二一……

Serena

12,477 просмотров • 1 год назад