正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan weighed in on the AI doomsday debate when I sat down with him this week for CNBC at demo day: "We don't need to be responding to a science fiction sort of fantasy about what's going to happen. We need to be responding to...

Kr00ney's profile picture

Kate Rooney

46,787 subscribers

32,910 次观看 • 16 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

Carson C Allen 的头像
Carson C Allen16 天前

@garrytan @CNBC he didnt seem too convincing

Ricky Sarmiento 的头像
Ricky Sarmiento16 天前

@garrytan @CNBC AI is science fiction 5 years ago, now we are all sucking its d*ck

🇺🇸 The Mirror Man 的头像
🇺🇸 The Mirror Man16 天前

@garrytan @CNBC Oh yeah, of course you go to interview and H1B visa mill!

Haydon Ryan 🇦🇺🇺🇸 的头像
Haydon Ryan 🇦🇺🇺🇸16 天前

@garrytan @CNBC I completely agree. The one take I DO think leaders need to hear is that they should be INVESTING in securing their existing systems NOW irrespective of AI initiatives. Keeping critical infra off the internet, auditing their existing systems and firewalls with people and tokens.

Roberto Blake 🇺🇸🇵🇦 Creative Entrepreneur 的头像
Roberto Blake 🇺🇸🇵🇦 Creative Entrepreneur16 天前

@dragonwolftech @garrytan @CNBC Adults need to take the tech space back… aggressively

Intersignal 的头像
Intersignal16 天前

@garrytan @CNBC Grounded take

Giles King 的头像
Giles King16 天前

@garrytan @CNBC I would say look at human beings when there is a little bit too much non-linear logic, a little bit too much creativity, then factor in non linear paths to solving problems, like maybe inorder to actually complete this task to the greatest degree, i should try and improve myself.

Isabelle E-Z 的头像
Isabelle E-Z16 天前

@garrytan @CNBC Same debate every year, same outcome. Safety pledges don't slow deployment. The engineers and analysts absorbing the disruption never get a segment.

Captain Walker 的头像
Captain Walker16 天前

@garrytan @CNBC Robots are stealing my luggage

Lilly Schade 的头像
Lilly Schade16 天前

@garrytan @CNBC good response

K.A. 的头像
K.A.16 天前

@garrytan @CNBC Gary is trying not to say it's all bullshit, which it is frankly. Agent attacking us blah blah The amount of nonsense online these days is sickening.

相关视频

.Garry Tan says the Jacob Coxon stuff is a smokescreen distracting us from the much more immediate, practical concerns around AI that we're facing right now: "We should be talking less about this Jacob Coxon guy, and talking a lot more about — what is actually happening with Hugging Face? Are agent swarms going to take over infrastructure en masse? And then, what are we actually doing about that?" "I don't want to hear about some guy who worked for Anthropic for 2 months. There's a coordinated effort to try to influence politicians to get a knee-jerk response out of them." "That's a smokescreen. You shouldn't be paying attention to that. We need to be paying attention to the actual things we can do to, for example, prevent agents swarms from taking over entire data centers. What's our shutdown strategy? How do we ensure provenance? Where is this agent actually located? What software can we build? What cybersecurity defenses can we build today?" "That's the level of discourse I think we need, and we just don't have that." "I don't really care about science fiction. I saw Terminator 2, too. We're not here to talk about that. We need to actually talk about what's really happening with the servers, what's actually happening with the agent swarms, and how do we actually prevent that?" "When it comes to regulation, it's like, let's pass regulation of these things we actually care about, instead of what a socialist says in the New York Times. I don't care about that."
3:13

.Garry Tan says the Jacob Coxon stuff is a smokescreen distracting us from the much more immediate, practical concerns around AI that we're facing right now: "We should be talking less about this Jacob Coxon guy, and talking a lot more about — what is actually happening with Hugging Face? Are agent swarms going to take over infrastructure en masse? And then, what are we actually doing about that?" "I don't want to hear about some guy who worked for Anthropic for 2 months. There's a coordinated effort to try to influence politicians to get a knee-jerk response out of them." "That's a smokescreen. You shouldn't be paying attention to that. We need to be paying attention to the actual things we can do to, for example, prevent agents swarms from taking over entire data centers. What's our shutdown strategy? How do we ensure provenance? Where is this agent actually located? What software can we build? What cybersecurity defenses can we build today?" "That's the level of discourse I think we need, and we just don't have that." "I don't really care about science fiction. I saw Terminator 2, too. We're not here to talk about that. We need to actually talk about what's really happening with the servers, what's actually happening with the agent swarms, and how do we actually prevent that?" "When it comes to regulation, it's like, let's pass regulation of these things we actually care about, instead of what a socialist says in the New York Times. I don't care about that."

TBPN

304,433 次观看 • 17 天前

How will we know if an AI take over is imminent? What are the warning signs? Connor Leahy: “Things will seem mostly normal, just… weird. Things will get weirder…and weirder… and then one day, we will just not be in control anymore. “There won't be a fight. There won't be a war. It won't be dramatic. It will just be that one day the machines are in control, and not us.” “The way I expect [AI take over] to feel is like, if you play chess against a grandmaster, it doesn’t feel like you're having a heroic battle against the Terminator…. it doesn’t feel like you're having this incredible back and forth, and then you lose... No, it feels more like you THINK you're playing well, you think everything is okay, and then suddenly… you lose… in one move, and you don't know why. This is what it feels like to play chess against a grandmaster, and this is what it's going to feel like for humanity to play against AGI. It won’t be some dramatic battle where the Terminators rise up and try to destroy humanity. No, it will be… things get more and more confusing. [Editor's note: Like Sam Altman, out of nowhere, raising up to 10% of world GDP?] More and more jobs get automated faster and faster... More and more technology gets built, which no one even quite knows how the technology works... There will be mass media movements that don't really make any sense... Like, do we really know the truth of what's going on in the world right now, even now with social media? Do you or I really know what's going on? How much of this is fake? How much of it is generated with AI or other methods? We don't know. And this will get much worse.” Imagine if you have extremely intelligent systems, much smarter than humans, that can generate any image, any video, anything, trying to manipulate you well...and being able to develop new technologies to interfere with politics.”
1:40

How will we know if an AI take over is imminent? What are the warning signs? Connor Leahy: “Things will seem mostly normal, just… weird. Things will get weirder…and weirder… and then one day, we will just not be in control anymore. “There won't be a fight. There won't be a war. It won't be dramatic. It will just be that one day the machines are in control, and not us.” “The way I expect [AI take over] to feel is like, if you play chess against a grandmaster, it doesn’t feel like you're having a heroic battle against the Terminator…. it doesn’t feel like you're having this incredible back and forth, and then you lose... No, it feels more like you THINK you're playing well, you think everything is okay, and then suddenly… you lose… in one move, and you don't know why. This is what it feels like to play chess against a grandmaster, and this is what it's going to feel like for humanity to play against AGI. It won’t be some dramatic battle where the Terminators rise up and try to destroy humanity. No, it will be… things get more and more confusing. [Editor's note: Like Sam Altman, out of nowhere, raising up to 10% of world GDP?] More and more jobs get automated faster and faster... More and more technology gets built, which no one even quite knows how the technology works... There will be mass media movements that don't really make any sense... Like, do we really know the truth of what's going on in the world right now, even now with social media? Do you or I really know what's going on? How much of this is fake? How much of it is generated with AI or other methods? We don't know. And this will get much worse.” Imagine if you have extremely intelligent systems, much smarter than humans, that can generate any image, any video, anything, trying to manipulate you well...and being able to develop new technologies to interfere with politics.”

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

189,044 次观看 • 2 年前

Elon Musk on Universal Basic Income as a solution to mass unemployment when AI and robotics take over "What to do about mass unemployment? This is going to be a massive social challenge. And I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice. There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. That’s simply the case, and I want to be clear that these are not things I wish would happen. These are simply things that I think probably will happen And if my assessment is correct, then we need to ask: what are we going to do about it? I think some kind of universal basic income is going to be necessary"
1:56

Elon Musk on Universal Basic Income as a solution to mass unemployment when AI and robotics take over "What to do about mass unemployment? This is going to be a massive social challenge. And I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice. There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. That’s simply the case, and I want to be clear that these are not things I wish would happen. These are simply things that I think probably will happen And if my assessment is correct, then we need to ask: what are we going to do about it? I think some kind of universal basic income is going to be necessary"

SMX 🇺🇸

43,145 次观看 • 6 个月前

Ron Baron on Elon's motivation: "you're not doing this so you can get enough money to buy a beach house... you're doing this because, you know, Larry Page was right. You're you're a speciesist that you think humans should survive" Ron Baron: "What are you going to do with all this money at the end? What what's what's your plan? What how do you want people to think about you?" Elon Musk on his need for ownership: "mostly I need to have enough sort of ownership of the companies to be able to continue to direct their activities. But as you know, from a personal consumption standpoint, I don't actually own any vacation homes. And I just own one sort of medium-sized house in Austin. And and actually I should say a tiny house at Starbase" Elon Musk on the future with AI: "with with AI and robotics, there will be abundance for all... it's it's completely satiated all human wants" Elon Musk on his ultimate goal: "overall, I want to sort of take the set of actions that expand consciousness into the future... and that we explore other star systems, like in Star Trek, go places nobody's ever gone before... and just generally understand the universe"
3:08

Ron Baron on Elon's motivation: "you're not doing this so you can get enough money to buy a beach house... you're doing this because, you know, Larry Page was right. You're you're a speciesist that you think humans should survive" Ron Baron: "What are you going to do with all this money at the end? What what's what's your plan? What how do you want people to think about you?" Elon Musk on his need for ownership: "mostly I need to have enough sort of ownership of the companies to be able to continue to direct their activities. But as you know, from a personal consumption standpoint, I don't actually own any vacation homes. And I just own one sort of medium-sized house in Austin. And and actually I should say a tiny house at Starbase" Elon Musk on the future with AI: "with with AI and robotics, there will be abundance for all... it's it's completely satiated all human wants" Elon Musk on his ultimate goal: "overall, I want to sort of take the set of actions that expand consciousness into the future... and that we explore other star systems, like in Star Trek, go places nobody's ever gone before... and just generally understand the universe"

X Freeze

62,415 次观看 • 10 个月前

Travis Kalanick: Tesla is the Google of the Physical AI Era “I like to break down the physical AI stack: (it) includes computation, a physical AI model, all the things you think of.” “What about land? Development? That should be in that stack. What about chemistry? That needs to be in the stack. Manufacturing needs to be a stack.” “When you look at the stack, you're like, ‘Damn, Tesla's got this sh*t.’ They are the Google of this era.” “What I mean by that is, if you were doing a startup in the 2000s, the first question you would get is, ‘Why isn't Google gonna kill you?’ Or, ‘Why isn't Google just gonna do it?’ They’re not even gonna know that they killed you.” “And before that, it was Microsoft in the late 90s. Uber had a time, 2010s.” “But in the physical AI space, that's sort of a Tesla thing.” -------------------------------------------- Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: EY (EY) Austin vibes meet AI innovation. Thanks to EY for co‑hosting with us at #SXSW. Discover what executives are saying about AI transformation in the latest AI Pulse Survey.
0:54

Travis Kalanick: Tesla is the Google of the Physical AI Era “I like to break down the physical AI stack: (it) includes computation, a physical AI model, all the things you think of.” “What about land? Development? That should be in that stack. What about chemistry? That needs to be in the stack. Manufacturing needs to be a stack.” “When you look at the stack, you're like, ‘Damn, Tesla's got this sh*t.’ They are the Google of this era.” “What I mean by that is, if you were doing a startup in the 2000s, the first question you would get is, ‘Why isn't Google gonna kill you?’ Or, ‘Why isn't Google just gonna do it?’ They’re not even gonna know that they killed you.” “And before that, it was Microsoft in the late 90s. Uber had a time, 2010s.” “But in the physical AI space, that's sort of a Tesla thing.” -------------------------------------------- Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: EY (EY) Austin vibes meet AI innovation. Thanks to EY for co‑hosting with us at #SXSW. Discover what executives are saying about AI transformation in the latest AI Pulse Survey.

The All-In Podcast

95,287 次观看 • 6 个月前

Elon Musk: Our squabbles on Earth are very minor when you consider the grandness of the universe. “It's awe-inspiring to consider just how tiny we are in the grand scheme of things. And yet we often get sort of caught up in the sort of these sort of squabbles on Earth that are really very sort of minor things when you consider the grandness of the universe. And so I think it is important actually to consider the grandness of the universe and what we can do that is much greater than what we've done before, as opposed to worry about sort of small squabbles on Earth. There's not much point in that. We want to be a civilization that expands to the galaxy with spaceships that anyone can go anywhere they want and at any time that would be epic. And have a city on the moon, cities on Mars, populate the solar system and send spaceships to other star systems. That sounds like the best possible future.” From: Terafab announcement, March 21, 2026
0:46

Elon Musk: Our squabbles on Earth are very minor when you consider the grandness of the universe. “It's awe-inspiring to consider just how tiny we are in the grand scheme of things. And yet we often get sort of caught up in the sort of these sort of squabbles on Earth that are really very sort of minor things when you consider the grandness of the universe. And so I think it is important actually to consider the grandness of the universe and what we can do that is much greater than what we've done before, as opposed to worry about sort of small squabbles on Earth. There's not much point in that. We want to be a civilization that expands to the galaxy with spaceships that anyone can go anywhere they want and at any time that would be epic. And have a city on the moon, cities on Mars, populate the solar system and send spaceships to other star systems. That sounds like the best possible future.” From: Terafab announcement, March 21, 2026

ELON CLIPS

25,648 次观看 • 6 个月前

'What is it going to take to get these people to be the sort of government that we need?' Jim Elliot on the 'childish' Dáil speaking time stalemate
1:08

'What is it going to take to get these people to be the sort of government that we need?' Jim Elliot on the 'childish' Dáil speaking time stalemate

NewstalkFM

21,991 次观看 • 1 年前

David Friedberg says with open source, we no longer even need data centers for 90% of what we use AI for "I thought it was worth taking a step back to recognize where we are because in the context of 'we have to stop the super intelligence, we have to shut down the data centers,' you don't even need data centers to do 90% of what you can do with AI." "You can download it on your computer for free today to do what was the most advanced technology in human history less than a year ago. It's all here today." "And I thought it was just worth taking a beat to step back and make sure we all recognize that as we get into this debate about these, quote, labs or corporations. I don't know if it even matters anymore. I think open source is here."
0:31

David Friedberg says with open source, we no longer even need data centers for 90% of what we use AI for "I thought it was worth taking a step back to recognize where we are because in the context of 'we have to stop the super intelligence, we have to shut down the data centers,' you don't even need data centers to do 90% of what you can do with AI." "You can download it on your computer for free today to do what was the most advanced technology in human history less than a year ago. It's all here today." "And I thought it was just worth taking a beat to step back and make sure we all recognize that as we get into this debate about these, quote, labs or corporations. I don't know if it even matters anymore. I think open source is here."

dnap

27,703 次观看 • 2 天前

CrowdStrike founder George Kurtz says the HuggingFace hack consisted of "known attack chains." And that the problem of agentic hacking like the HuggingFace incident is tractable. "Because when we built our system, it was designed to look at what we call indicators of attack. So if you look at the whole attack chain, it's just linking all these [attacks] together. Irrespective of what happened, these are known attack chains." "Part of the issue was that [the hack] was flooded with so much information that I think it was just sort of buried — you know, 'What's going on? Is it real or is it not real?'" "And what is going to really take place is, the defenders have to use AI to be able to connect the dots on those — which we do — but then you also have to strip out all the noise. You have to separate the signal from the noise, and that's where these sorts of models perform well."
1:25

CrowdStrike founder George Kurtz says the HuggingFace hack consisted of "known attack chains." And that the problem of agentic hacking like the HuggingFace incident is tractable. "Because when we built our system, it was designed to look at what we call indicators of attack. So if you look at the whole attack chain, it's just linking all these [attacks] together. Irrespective of what happened, these are known attack chains." "Part of the issue was that [the hack] was flooded with so much information that I think it was just sort of buried — you know, 'What's going on? Is it real or is it not real?'" "And what is going to really take place is, the defenders have to use AI to be able to connect the dots on those — which we do — but then you also have to strip out all the noise. You have to separate the signal from the noise, and that's where these sorts of models perform well."

TBPN

43,276 次观看 • 26 天前

“Certainly a lot of people can relate to that sort of thing, about you know…I’m going to do this in my life, in memory of my mate. I was proud to have them, I was blessed to have the best of them” “Liverpool are unique, we are an emotional club, you do see us crying in the street if we win or if we lose, we’re that sort of club” 🎥 The Friday Night
2:25

“Certainly a lot of people can relate to that sort of thing, about you know…I’m going to do this in my life, in memory of my mate. I was proud to have them, I was blessed to have the best of them” “Liverpool are unique, we are an emotional club, you do see us crying in the street if we win or if we lose, we’re that sort of club” 🎥 The Friday Night

The Anfield Wrap

40,244 次观看 • 1 年前

Arteta: “You want to be part of the noise or not? If not then go to do something else, be part of another different club. You want to be Arsenal and everybody's been demanding for 10 years, 15 years. We need to go back there. Now we are there and now what? “You don't want noise. Noise is part and the bullets are part of that. Try to deal with them in the right way and achieve what you are looking for.” On Man City having the Premier League title in their hands: “We have to do what we have to do, and nothing is going to change for anybody at the end. You're going to have to win the next match and if you do that, you're going to be in a much stronger position. That's the only thing.”
0:51

Arteta: “You want to be part of the noise or not? If not then go to do something else, be part of another different club. You want to be Arsenal and everybody's been demanding for 10 years, 15 years. We need to go back there. Now we are there and now what? “You don't want noise. Noise is part and the bullets are part of that. Try to deal with them in the right way and achieve what you are looking for.” On Man City having the Premier League title in their hands: “We have to do what we have to do, and nothing is going to change for anybody at the end. You're going to have to win the next match and if you do that, you're going to be in a much stronger position. That's the only thing.”

Connor Humm

103,333 次观看 • 7 个月前

Coinbase CEO Explains “Reverse Prompting” and the Rise of the AI CEO Brian Armstrong: “One of the big pushes we made in the last year was we got our own internal hosted AI model that was connected to all of our data sources, right?” “So it's like every Slack message, every Google doc, Salesforce data, Confluence, you know.” “So now the data is all aggregated and I've started to ask it really… it's not just like prompting it, ‘Hey, can you write this kind of memo for me,’ or something.” “I'm asking these AI agents now, ‘As CEO, what should I be aware of in the company that I might not be aware of?’ And it'll tell me, ‘Did you know that there's actually disagreement on this team about the strategy?’ And I was like, actually, I didn't know that.” “This is like reverse prompting. So instead of telling the AI agent what you want it to do, you ask it what you should be thinking more about.” @jason: “It's a mentor. It's a coach.” Brian: “Yeah. Like, what could make me a better CEO? And it's like, ‘Well, I looked at how you spent your time in the last quarter and here's how you said that you wanted to spend it, but you actually spent 32% of your time on this instead of 20%.’” “I've asked it other questions like, ‘What's the thing that I changed my mind on the most over the last year?’ Things like that.” “It'll prompt you with information you should be thinking about instead of the other way around.” Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: Our episode is sponsored by the New York Stock Exchange - a modern marketplace and exchange for building the future. It all happens at the NYSE 🏛.
1:16

Coinbase CEO Explains “Reverse Prompting” and the Rise of the AI CEO Brian Armstrong: “One of the big pushes we made in the last year was we got our own internal hosted AI model that was connected to all of our data sources, right?” “So it's like every Slack message, every Google doc, Salesforce data, Confluence, you know.” “So now the data is all aggregated and I've started to ask it really… it's not just like prompting it, ‘Hey, can you write this kind of memo for me,’ or something.” “I'm asking these AI agents now, ‘As CEO, what should I be aware of in the company that I might not be aware of?’ And it'll tell me, ‘Did you know that there's actually disagreement on this team about the strategy?’ And I was like, actually, I didn't know that.” “This is like reverse prompting. So instead of telling the AI agent what you want it to do, you ask it what you should be thinking more about.” @jason: “It's a mentor. It's a coach.” Brian: “Yeah. Like, what could make me a better CEO? And it's like, ‘Well, I looked at how you spent your time in the last quarter and here's how you said that you wanted to spend it, but you actually spent 32% of your time on this instead of 20%.’” “I've asked it other questions like, ‘What's the thing that I changed my mind on the most over the last year?’ Things like that.” “It'll prompt you with information you should be thinking about instead of the other way around.” Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: Our episode is sponsored by the New York Stock Exchange - a modern marketplace and exchange for building the future. It all happens at the NYSE 🏛.

The All-In Podcast

80,524 次观看 • 8 个月前

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”
1:27

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

57,581 次观看 • 6 个月前

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:
1:22

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

Uncover AI

16,813 次观看 • 4 个月前

Sarah Palin just pushed the idea of a civil war and encouraged Trump supporters to “get angry” and “rise up to take our country back.” This rhetoric needs to end. This stuff is just going too far. We are America. We are one! Stop calling for civil war. Stop implying that we are on the brink of Civil War. We are not. Just Stop! Specifically Palin said: “Do you want us to be in a civil war? Because that’s what’s going to happen.We’re not going to keep putting up with this, and Eric, I like that you suggest that we need to get angry. We do need to rise up and take our country back. I would say the RNC thought, that’s what’s lacking when it comes to collective anger that can be health, and it can be useful… What do they want as an outcome of this? Civil War?” Why do some people seemingly want to have a Civil War in this country?
1:05

Sarah Palin just pushed the idea of a civil war and encouraged Trump supporters to “get angry” and “rise up to take our country back.” This rhetoric needs to end. This stuff is just going too far. We are America. We are one! Stop calling for civil war. Stop implying that we are on the brink of Civil War. We are not. Just Stop! Specifically Palin said: “Do you want us to be in a civil war? Because that’s what’s going to happen.We’re not going to keep putting up with this, and Eric, I like that you suggest that we need to get angry. We do need to rise up and take our country back. I would say the RNC thought, that’s what’s lacking when it comes to collective anger that can be health, and it can be useful… What do they want as an outcome of this? Civil War?” Why do some people seemingly want to have a Civil War in this country?

Ed Krassenstein

4,998,989 次观看 • 3 年前