Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Yeah, Denims is really providing transformative content. You would think receiving a lawsuit on copyright infringement would motivate you to further elaborate on your commentary or implement changes on your stream. However, Denims seems to believe no changes are needed.

78,298 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Twitch Streamer Denims briefly went over her recent reply to the motion on Judgement for the pleadings that was filed yesterday (5/8/26) in her lawsuit with Ethan Klein of H3H3 Productions. In the filing, Denims covers a quote of hers that is being used in the lawsuit by Ethan's attorney, specifically stating Denims is acting as a market replacement for the nuke, thus committing copyright infringement: " if you want to enjoy it (Ethan's content nuke on Hasan), you know, come and enjoy the watch party somewhere else." Denims states: " The full quote is if you want to enjoy it, come, you know, come and enjoy the watch party somewhere else, in reference to not spamming it in Hasan chat. Instead of watching it somewhere that isn't spamming it in Hasan's chat because Hasan is not going to watch it. Like, the levels of dishonesty are crazy. And the fact that people still just take everything Ethan says at face value is kind of embarrassing. At that point just desperately want to believe that this guy wouldn't lie to you. and so you are just going double triple quadruple down." Wasn't Hasan already stating that he wasn't going to watch the nuke prior to it releasing? If that's the case, what's the point of spamming in his chat if he was already stating that, and this provided context wouldn't justify the legal argument that Ethan's lawyer is giving, stating that Denims (and others) were acting as a market replacement for the nuke?

Leigha Sapienti

53,752 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce